Description
Protein detection is a powerful technique used broadly in research, however the successful use of antibodies has its practical limitations presented by the lack of knowledge about the protein in question, poor accessibility of the target sites, specificity barrier and cross-reactivity with other proteins (Fritze and Anderson, 2000). In these cases the insertion of a known short amino acid sequence into the desired locus can be considered. This sequence allows the protein in question to be traceable and detectable by a pre-existing commercial well-characterized antibody. Since the first ever tag was developed in 1943 (Rawson, 1943) there have been many scientific and technological advances which allowed the development of the clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology which we use here to insert an HA tag (YPYDVPDYA) into the 3’ end of the Xenopus laevisgata2.Lgene (NM_001090574.1).
Four single guide RNAs were designed to anneal to a particular sequence in the genome (Xenopus laevisJ strain 9.1), guiding Cas9 to make the double-stranded cut 3 bp away from the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) site (Mojica et al., 2009)close to the stop codon of the Xenopus laevis gata2.Lgene (Fig1A). The sgRNA sequence that anneals to the target sequence is 20 nucleotides long with the T7 polymerase promoter sequence at the 5’ and a 15 nucleotide sequence at the 3’ end that anneals to a standard oligonucleotide (Nakayama et al., 2013)(Fig1B), which in turn forms a secondary structure that binds the Cas9 protein. In this study, CRISPRscan (Moreno-Mateos et al., 2015),an online predictive sgRNA-scoring algorithm, was used to identify potential sgRNAs and the highest scoring sgRNA were used.
The sgRNAs were synthesised as previously described (Nakayama et al., 2013). In summary, the synthetic sgRNA encoding sequences were annealed to a universal single-stranded oligonucleotide and filled in using Taq polymerase to make a double-stranded DNA. The resulting amplicons were visualized by gel electrophoresis and RNA synthesized using Megashortscript™ T7 Transcription Kit (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions; the RNA product was then visualised on a 1.5 % agarose gel.
To test which was the most efficient sgRNA, three amounts of each sgRNA were tested, 50 pg, 100 pg and 250 pg; a 4 µl mix was prepared containing 4 µM Cas9 protein, the chosen sgRNA amount and dH2O. Embryos were injected at the 1-cell stage with 4 nl of the mix and allowed to develop to stage 16. The embryos injected with 250 pg of the sgRNA failed to gastrulate and survivors were deformed. All the following injections were thus made using 100 pg of sgRNA. Genomic DNA was extracted from 20 individual embryos and the target region amplified by PCR. To test if the cas9/sgRNA injections successfully altered the target gene the amplicons were denatured and allowed to reanneal. Once annealed, T7 endonuclease was introduced into the mix and further incubated. The reaction products were then visualised via gel electrophoresis; homoduplexes are not cut by the enzyme and heteroduplexes are, a difference readily detected by gel electrophoresis. The stronger the lower (digested) band the more efficient the sgRNA is. Three of the sgRNAs produced very weak lower bands, one cut more than half of the amplicon. This sgRNA was used for all further experiments.
To assess the efficiency and specificity of the mutagenesis, the target PCR products were sub-cloned into pGemTeasy and sequenced. Eighty-one percent of the sequences obtained showed deletions around the desired cut site. It also showed some random insertions in 6 % of the sequenced clones (Fig1C; Fig1D).
Embryos were co-injected at the one-cell stage with sgRNA, Cas9 Nuclease NLS (S. pyogenes, NEB) and ssOligonucleotide (Fig1A), and allowed to grow. Cas9 protein was injected on its own as a negative control. The majority of embryos did not develop after gastrulation and were mostly deformed with most of the deaths between stages 8 and 12, correlating with the onset of expression of gata2.Lin the embryo. Tadpoles were tested by PCR of the extracted genomic DNA and positive PCR amplicons were cloned into pGemTeasy for sequencing. From each cloning reaction, 5 colonies were prepped and sequenced. The sequences showed a variety of in-frame and out-of-frame insertions. From over 6000 injected embryos, 168 (2.8 %) grew to tail-bud stage from which 27 of the F0s tested positive for the in-frame insertion (0.45 %).
Fifteen frogs developed to adulthood, 8 (0.13 % of the original 6000) of these produce offspring containing the in-frame HA tag. Screening of F1 embryos is ongoing, with the aim of detecting the Gata2.L-HA protein by western blot and immunohistochemistry.
The extremely low insertion rate can be attributed to non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) background and probably the competition between homology directed recombination (HDR) and replication which is very rapid in the early embryo, generating highly mosaic embryos. One route that can overcome these issues, and thus increase the insertion rate and lower the embryo mosaicism is to modify the oocyte before fertilization. Aslan et al (2017) have shown that by injecting the CRISPR components into oocytes followed by host transfer that they increase the rates of HDR over NHEJ, producing non-mosaic embryos.
Reagents
Cas9 Nuclease NLS, S. pyogenes (NEB)
pGEM®-T Easy Vector Systems (Promega)
E. coli DH5α (homemade)
GoTaq® G2 Hot Start Master Mixes (Promega)
Megashortscript™ T7 Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher)
Acknowledgments
Funding
This work was funded by the BBSRC (BB/K0199881).
References
- Fritze CE, Anderson TR. Epitope tagging: general method for tracking recombinant proteins. Methods Enzymol. 2000;327:3–16. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)27263-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rawson, R. A. The binding of t-1824 and structurally related diazo dyes by the plasma proteins. Am. J. Physiol. Content 138, 708–717 (1943).
- Mojica FJM, Díez-Villaseñor C, García-Martínez J, Almendros C. Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology. 2009 Mar 01;155(Pt 3):733–740. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.023960-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakayama T, Fish MB, Fisher M, Oomen-Hajagos J, Thomsen GH, Grainger RM. Simple and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Xenopus tropicalis. Genesis. 2013 Dec 01;51(12):835–843. doi: 10.1002/dvg.22720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreno-Mateos MA, Vejnar CE, Beaudoin JD, Fernandez JP, Mis EK, Khokha MK, Giraldez AJ. CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 targeting in vivo. Nat Methods. 2015 Aug 31;12(10):982–988. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aslan Y, Tadjuidje E, Zorn AM, Cha SW. High-efficiency non-mosaic CRISPR-mediated knock-in and indel mutation in F0 Xenopus. Development. 2017 Jul 10;144(15):2852–2858. doi: 10.1242/dev.152967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]