Skip to main content
JACC Case Reports logoLink to JACC Case Reports
. 2020 May 22;2(9):1291–1296. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.05.024

A Case Series of Stent Thrombosis During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Alicia Prieto-Lobato 1, Raquel Ramos-Martínez 1, Nuria Vallejo-Calcerrada 1, Miguel Corbí-Pascual 1, Juan G Córdoba-Soriano 1,
PMCID: PMC7255188  PMID: 32835270

Abstract

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) triggers a hypercoagulable state with a high incidence of thrombotic complications. We have noted a higher than expected incidence of stent thrombosis in these patients. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Key Words: coronary artery, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, stent thrombosis

Abbreviations and Acronyms: ASA, acetyl salicylic acid; COVID-19, coronavirus disease-2019; DES, drug-eluting stent; LAD, left anterior descending; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg


Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) triggers a hypercoagulable state with a high incidence of thrombotic complications. We have noted a higher than…

Introduction

Advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques, improvement in coronary stent designs, and more effective antithrombotic therapies have made coronary stent thrombosis a rare complication. The incidence at 30 days is <1%, whereas rates of late and very late stent thrombosis are 0.5% to 1% and 0.2% to 2% per year, respectively (1). Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has modified the usual presentation of many diseases as we know them. This disease promotes a sustained prothrombotic state, triggered by interactions among proinflammatory cytokines, procoagulant factors, and platelets. We have recently observed an increase in stent thrombosis during the COVID-19 pandemic peak in our center, the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete in Albacete, Spain.

Learning Objectives

  • COVID-19 increases both arterial and venous thrombogenicity.

  • The SARS-CoV-2 hypercoagulable state may lead to a stent thrombosis trigger in the presence of other mechanical and biological risk factors.

  • Recommendations on antithrombotic treatment and PCI for acute coronary syndromes should be maintained during COVID-19 treatment.

Case Reports

Case 1

A 49-year-old man underwent primary angioplasty for a lateral ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) 6 h after the onset of symptoms (Figures 1A to 1F). Balloon angioplasty in a small ramus intermedius was performed. To decrease hospital length of stay, ad hoc PCI was performed in the circumflex artery with 2 overlapped drug-eluting stents (DES) (Videos 1 and 2). Thirty minutes later, there was new onset of more intense chest pain with marked ST-segment depression in the precordial leads. Acute circumflex artery stent thrombosis was confirmed by repeat angiography (Video 3). Optical coherence tomography demonstrated in-stent mixed thrombus with mild proximal stent underexpansion and a nonsignificant dissection of the distal stent edge. Intracoronary tirofiban was effective in reducing thrombus burden, and proximal overexpansion of the stent was performed (Videos 4 and 5). The patient received acetyl salicylic acid (ASA), ticagrelor, and a 24-h continuous infusion of tirofiban after the procedure. He had dry cough with a chest radiograph compatible with COVID-19 infection, but no tests were performed because we were at the early stage of the pandemic and the threshold of suspicion was high. The patient was discharged at 4 days. Serological testing 23 days later confirmed that immunoglobulin G was positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Case 1: Acute Stent Thrombosis

(A) Electrocardiogram at admission showing lateral ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. (B) Electrocardiogram 30 min after circumflex percutaneous coronary intervention showing posterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. (C) Ramus occlusion (+) and 2 critical lesions (asterisks) in the proximal circumflex artery and first marginal branch. (D) Final result after percutaneous coronary intervention of ramus (arrowhead) and circumflex arteries (dotted line indicates the position of 2 overlapped drug-eluting stents). (E) Stent thrombosis, with haziness at the (a) proximal and (d) distal edge, as well as (c) at the bifurcation. (F) Final result after stent thrombosis treatment, with complete flow restored. (a to d),optical coherence tomography imaging showing (a) no compromise of the proximal edge, (b) mild proximal underexpansion of stent with mixed thrombus, which can also be observed (c) in the origin of the second marginal branch and (d) near the distal edge, which has (e) mild dissection.

Online Video 1.

Download video file (2MB, mp4)

Case 1: Midocclusion of the Ramus Artery

The ramus artery occlusion was the index lesion. Critical stenoses in circumflex artery is also present.

Online Video 2.

Download video file (1.6MB, mp4)

Case 1: Final Result After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of the Circumflex and Ramus Arteries

Online Video 3.

Download video file (1.4MB, mp4)

Case 1: Angiogram of the Stent Thrombosis

No occlusive thrombosis was present, but haziness is seen proximal to the edges of the stent. Haziness is also seen at the bifurcation with the second marginal branch, with distal occlusion of this branch.

Online Video 4.

Download video file (7.2MB, mp4)

Case 1: Optical Coherence Tomography of the Stent Thrombosis

Mixed thrombus is seen mainly at the proximal segment, with mild underexpansion. Thrombus at the origin of the bifurcation with second marginal branch, mild dissection (<60º and < 2 mm length) at distal edge.

Online Video 5.

Download video file (1.1MB, mp4)

Case 1: Angiogram Showing Final Result After Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa Inhibitor Use and Overexpansion of the Proximal Segment of the Stent

Case 2

A 71-year-old man was admitted in 2007 for an inferior STEMI that was treated with right coronary artery DES. He presented with a high-risk non-STEMI resulting from very late right coronary artery stent thrombosis. Thrombectomy, tirofiban, and 2 DESs restored flow. The patient reported fever and cough some days before admission; blood testing and chest radiograph showed COVID-19–compatible findings. The patient remained asymptomatic, and no confirmatory tests were performed for the same reason as in the first patient.

Case 3

An 86-year-old man with history of non-STEMI in 2018 that was treated with left anterior descending (LAD) artery DES underwent primary angioplasty for 6 h of chest pain and an anterior STEMI. Very late LAD artery stent thrombosis was found, and a new DES was implanted. The patient was asymptomatic, but because the COVID-19 pandemic had reached its peak, a pre-admission polymerase chain reaction test was performed, with a positive result. The patient had a favorable course and was discharged 5 days later.

Case 4

An 85-year old man underwent PCI with ostial LAD artery DES implantation in 2005. He presented at the pandemic peak with chest pain, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30%, and anterior ST-segment elevation with prior Q waves (Figures 2A to 2D). The result of immunoglobulin M serological testing was positive despite the absence of respiratory symptoms. Angiography demonstrated very late LAD artery stent thrombosis (Video 6), which was treated with balloon angioplasty, thrombectomy, and tirofiban (Video 7). Intravascular ultrasound was performed and showed in-stent thrombus, appropriate stent expansion, and nonsignificant neoatherosclerosis (Video 8). The patient was treated with combined lopinavir and ritonavir, and despite his age, received ASA and prasugrel as antiplatelet therapy. Ten days later, prasugrel was replaced by clopidogrel (after antiviral treatment was completed), and the patient was discharged.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Case 4: Very Late Stent Thrombosis

(A) Baseline electrocardiogram showing anterior Q waves with negative T waves in the precordial leads. (B) Electrocardiogram on admission, with ST-segment elevation in the precordial leads and reciprocal changes in the inferior leads. (C) Complete ostial left anterior descending artery stent thrombosis; (a to d) indicate the level of the images obtained with intravascular ultrasound. (D) Left anterior descending artery flow restored after percutaneous coronary intervention. Intravascular ultrasound images: (a), left main coronary artery immediately proximal to stent; (b) and (c), correct expansion without malapposition or neoatherosclerosis and with thrombus adhered to the stent; (d), distal edge of the stent, without complications.

Online Video 6.

Download video file (1.4MB, mp4)

Case 4: Angiogram Showing Occlusive Ostial Left Anterior Descending Artery Stent Thrombosis

Online Video 7.

Download video file (1MB, mp4)

Case 4: Angiogram Showing Final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction III Flow Result After Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa Inhibitor Use, Thrombectomy, and Balloon Angioplasty of the Left Anterior Descending Artery Thrombosis

Online Video 8.

Download video file (36.1MB, mp4)

Case 4: Intravascular ultrasound Showing In-stent Fresh Thrombus With Correct Expansion and No or Mild Neoatherosclerosis

Proximal and distal edges are not damaged.

Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly decreased worldwide interventional cardiology activity. In Spain, cardiac catheterization procedures have been reduced by 48%, with a reduction of 40% for primary angioplasty (2). Similar data have been reported in the United States (3). Compared with the immediate period before the pandemic peak (February 1 to 23, 2020), we experienced a 38% decrease in PCIs at our center between March 15, 2020 and April 5, 2020 (31 vs. 50). Moreover, we had an increase in the incidence of stent thrombosis (4 vs. 0; 13% of PCIs performed during this period). In 2019, we performed 899 PCIs, with 11 (1.2%) cases of stent thrombosis. Given the perception of a high rate of stent thrombosis among COVID-19 cases in other centers in Spain, a prospective registry is being conducted.

A greater thrombogenic predisposition, both arterial and venous, during COVID-19 has been established. Pathophysiologically, the cytokine storm that occurs 5 to 7 days after the onset of symptoms promotes the coagulation cascade, as well as platelet activation mediated by interleukin-6 and tissue factor. The latter induces an increase in thrombin and fibrin synthesis, as well as platelet production. Thrombocytosis can occur, as can high levels of D-dimer and fibrinogen, with intravascular disseminated coagulation criteria often fulfilled (4,5). Additionally, endothelial damage, which could be caused by the virus binding to the angiotensin-converting enzyme receptor and the stasis promoted by the permanent inflammation, would complete the Virchow triad criteria (6).

We present 1 case of acute stent thrombosis and 3 very late stent thrombosis cases (Table 1). Despite no initial COVID-19 testing in 2 cases, symptoms and subsequent testing (Figures 3A to 3D) supported that the patients were infected at the time of stent thrombosis (Table 2).

Table 1.

Summary of Cases of Stent Thrombosis Presented During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4
Age, yrs 49 71 86 85
Sex Male Male Male Male
COVID-19 status IgG + Suspicion PCR + IgM +
COVID-19 presentation Cough, bilateral ground-glass infiltrates Cough, fever, bilateral ground-glass infiltrates Asymptomatic, bilateral ground-glass infiltrates Asymptomatic, bilateral ground-glass infiltrates.
COVID19 treatment No No Hydroxychloroquine
Acetylcysteine
Hydroxychloroquine
Azithromycin
Lopinavir-ritonavir
Ceftriaxone
Presentation STEMI NSTEMI STEMI STEMI
Physical examination Rales up to ½ lung fields Normal Normal Peripheral edema
 Heart rate (beats/min) 110 53 75 80
 Blood pressure (mm Hg) 150/86 150/85 160/80 110/60
 So2 (%) 90 96 95 95
 Temperature (ºC) 36.5 37.5 36 35.6
Vessel responsible Proximal circumflex – OM (90% stenosis) Mid-RCA (occluded) Proximal LAD (occluded) Proximal LAD (occluded)
Stent thrombosed DES ×2 (Ultimaster 3 × 15 mm) BMS (Driver 3.5 × 18 mm) DES (Cypher 3 × 18 mm) DES (Synergy 3.5 × 32 mm)
Timing Acute (30 min) Very late (13 yrs) Very late (2 yrs) Very late (4 yrs)
APT before admission None ASA ASA ASA
APT during PCI ASA + clopidogrel ASA+ clopidogrel ASA + clopidogrel ASA+ prasugrel
Anticoagulation during PCI UFH 8,000 IU UFH 5,000 IU UFH 8,000 IU UFH 7,000 IU
Vascular approach Right radial Left radial Left radial Left radial
PCI technique GPI
BA
OCT guidance
Thrombectomy
DES (Synergy 4 × 28 mm)
GPI
DES (Ultimaster 3 × 15 mm) Thrombectomy
BA
IVUS guidance
APT discharge ASA + ticagrelor ASA+ ticagrelor ASA + clopidogrel ASA + clopidogrel
LVEF (%) at discharge 45% 55% 45% 30%
Risk factors for stent thrombosis
 Patient DM
LVD
ACS
CKD
ACS
Age
DM
LVD
CKD
ACS
PAD
Age
LVD
ACS
 Lesion Bifurcation No No Ostial lesion
 Procedural Primary PCI
Multivessel PCI
Malapposition
Underexpansion
Dissection
No First-generation DES
Overlapped stents
Long stent

ACS = acute coronary syndrome; APT = antiplatelet therapy; ASA = acetyl salicylic acid; BA = balloon angioplasty; BMS = bare metal stent; CKD = chronic kidney disease; COVID-19 = coronavirus disease-2019; DES = drug-eluting stent; DM = diabetes mellitus; GPI = glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitor; IU = international units; IVUS = intravascular ultrasound; NSTEMI = non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; OCT = optical coherence tomography; OM = obtuse marginal branch; RCA = right coronary artery; LAD = left anterior descending; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVD = left ventricular dysfunction; PAD = peripheral artery disease; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; So2 = oxygen saturation; STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; UFH = unfractionated heparin.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Chest Radiographs of Patients

(A) Case 1, peripheral interstitial infiltrates, mainly affecting the left base and subpleural regions. (B) Case 2, both central and peripheral alveolointerstitial infiltrates, probably from mixed heart failure. (C) (Case 3) and (D) (Case 4), mild infiltrates, mainly central and resulting from mild heart failure. D = right; PA = posteroanterior.

Table 2.

Summary of Laboratory Testing

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4
COVID-19 tests IgM−/IgG + Not performed PCR + IgM+/IgG−
D-dimer (45–500 μg/l) 630 539 662 1,251
Fibrinogen (150–450 mg/dl) 443 271 263 263
Partial thromboplastin time (25–39 seg) 32.7 28.3 29.4 31.1
Prothrombin time (70%–120%) 67 93 93 55
Platelets (140–400 × 103/μl) 175 127 167 165
C-reactive protein (0–5 mg/l) 12 24 9.6 40.5
Ferritin (30–400 ng/ml) 1,233 1,010 72 2,411
Lymphocyte count (1–4 × 103/μl) 1,590 930 2,240 790
High-sensitivity T troponin peak (0–14 pg/ml) 2,404 3,324 2,406 7,782
Creatine kinase peak (38–174 U/l) 874 634 523 1,276
GFRe (ml/min) 110 56 68 44

COVID-19 = coronavirus disease-2019; GFRe = estimated glomerular filtration rate; IgG = immunoglobulin G; IgM = immunoglobulin M; PCR = polymerase chain reaction; seg = segmented.

Very late stent thrombosis with a first-generation DES occurs in the presence of a sustained inflammatory response. Other factors such as delayed endothelialization, late malapposition, or neoatherosclerosis plaque rupture can sometimes be implicated (7). Two of our patients had chronic kidney disease, which can induce a permanent inflammatory response, and 1 patient had a first-generation DES. The patient with acute stent thrombosis had mild proximal stent underexpansion detected by optical coherence tomography. All patients were receiving appropriate antiplatelet therapy at the time of stent thrombosis; the patient with acute thrombosis was following an ASA-clopidogrel regimen, whereas the 3 patients with very late stent thrombosis were taking ASA therapy. We think that SARS-CoV-2 infection triggered stent thrombosis in these patients.

Finally, the latest official statements for COVID-19 patients recommend following current PCI guidelines (8). Expert recommendations have been published on antithrombotic therapy management, with special consideration given to possible interactions with the drugs used for COVID-19 (9). This is especially important with drugs metabolized through CYP3A4, such as clopidogrel or ticagrelor, which could interact with antiviral agents such as lopinavir combined with ritonavir or darunavir combined with cobicistat. Therefore, prasugrel could be the drug of choice in patients without contraindications (prior stroke) but who are >75 years of age or have a weight <60 kg if antiviral agents are considered indispensable. Because of the low evidence on the effectiveness of these antiviral agents against SARS-CoV-2, antiplatelet therapy should be prioritized for COVID-19 patients in the setting of acute coronary syndromes.

Footnotes

The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

The authors attest they are in compliance with human studies committees and animal welfare regulations of the authors’ institutions and Food and Drug Administration guidelines, including patient consent where appropriate. For more information, visit the JACC: Case Reportsauthor instructions page.

Appendix

For supplemental videos, please see the online version of this paper.

References

  • 1.Gori T., Polimeni A., Indolfi C. Predictors of stent thrombosis and their implications for clinical practice. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16:243–256. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0118-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rodríguez-Leor O., Cid-Álvarez B., Ojeda S. Impacto de la pandemia de COVID-19 sobre la actividad asistencial en cardiología intervencionista en España. REC Interv Cardiol. 2020;2:82–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Garcia S., Albaghdadi M.S., Meraj P.M. Reduction in ST-segment elevation cardiac catheterization laboratory activations in the United States during COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2871–2872. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ranucci M., Ballotta A., Di Dedda U. The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Apr 17 doi: 10.1111/jth.14854. [E-pub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Atri D., Siddiqi H.K., Lang J. COVID-19 for the cardiologist: a current review of the virology, clinical epidemiology, cardiac and other clinical manifestations and potential therapeutic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol Basic Transl Sci. 2020;5:518–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vivas D., Roldán V., Esteve-Pastor M.A. Recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento antitrombótico durante la pandemia COVID-19. Posicionamiento del Grupo de Trabajo de Trombosis Cardiovascular de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2020 Apr 22 doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2020.04.006. [E-pub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Torrado J., Buckley L., Durán A. Restenosis, stent thrombosis, and bleeding complications: navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:1676–1695. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hendren N.S., Drazner M.H., Bozkurt B. Description and proposed management of the acute COVID-19 cardiovascular syndrome. Circulation. 2020;141:1903–1914. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bikdeli B., Madhavan M.V., Jimenez D. COVID-19 and thrombotic or thromboembolic disease: implications for prevention, antithrombotic therapy, and follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2950–2973. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JACC Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES