Skip to main content
Current Developments in Nutrition logoLink to Current Developments in Nutrition
. 2020 May 29;4(Suppl 2):1449. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa061_077

Demographic and Behavioral Correlates of Energy Drink Consumption

Andre Markon 1, Jorge E Chavarro 2, Ming Ding 2, Beverly Wolpert 1
PMCID: PMC7259303

Abstract

Objectives

This study assessed energy drink consumption and high-risk behaviors, including alcohol and drug use, cross-sectionally among participants in three cohort studies—the Nurses’ Health Study 3 (NHS 3), the Growing Up Today Study (GUTS) and GUTS2.

Methods

Questionnaires, including validated food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs), collected participant demographics, risky behavior, and energy drink consumption data. [The specific question used for energy drink intake read as follows: “Do you drink energy drinks, e.g., Red Bull, Rock Star, Monster (8 oz. can)?” for NHS3, 2010–2019; GUTS, 2011; and GUTS2, 2011.] Following descriptive analysis, multivariable-adjusted logistic regression estimated associations between energy drink consumption and odds of risky behaviors, including pooled odds-ratios (pORs) across all cohorts.

Results

Of the 46,390 participants this study assessed, ∼13% reported energy drink consumption at least monthly. Risky behaviors associated with energy drink consumption included smoking [pOR: 1.88 (95% CI 1.55–2.29)], having higher body mass index [pORs: 1.31 (95% CI 1.11–1.53) for overweight (25–30 kg/m2) and 1.67 (95% CI 1.34–2.08) for obesity (≥30 kg/m2) compared to <25 kg/m2, respectively], insufficient sleep [pOR: 1.29 (95% CI 1.11–1.50) for <7 hours compared to 7–9 hours], tanning bed use [pOR: 2.31 (95% CI 1.96–2.72)], binge drinking [pOR: 2.53 (95% CI 2.09–3.07)], marijuana use [pOR: 1.49 (95% CI 1.28–1.73)], and use of any illegal drugs (other than marijuana) [pOR: 1.45 (95% CI 1.16–1.81)]. Demographic factors associated with consumption of energy drinks included higher education, which was associated with lower odds of energy drink consumption [pORs: 0.71 (95% CI 0.56–0.91) for bachelor's degree and 0.55 (95% CI 0.40–0.74) for master's degree, compared to no bachelor's degree, respectively], and race/ethnicity [pOR: 4.43 (95% CI: 2.41–8.15) comparing African Americans to non-Hispanic white].

Conclusions

Both within and across the cohorts, risky behaviors were associated with higher odds of energy drink consumption.

Funding Sources

This study was funded via FDA contracts and NIH grants.


Articles from Current Developments in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES