Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) logoLink to Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
. 2020 May 19;35(5):1159–1167. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa049

Thyroid function in neonates conceived after hysterosalpingography with iodinated contrast

N van Welie 1,✉, I Roest 1,2, M Portela 1, J van Rijswijk 1, C Koks 2, C B Lambalk 1, K Dreyer 1, B W J Mol 3, M J J Finken 4, V Mijatovic 1; the H2Oil Study Group2
PMCID: PMC7259368  PMID: 32427280

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Does exposure to preconceptional hysterosalpingography (HSG) with iodinated oil-based contrast affect neonatal thyroid function as compared to iodinated water-based contrast?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Preconceptional HSG with iodinated contrast did not influence the neonatal thyroid function.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

HSG is a commonly applied tubal patency test during fertility work-up in which either oil- or water-based contrast is used. Oil-based contrast contains more iodine compared to water-based contrast. A previous study in an East Asian population found an increased risk of congenital hypothyroidism (CH) in neonates whose mothers were exposed to high amounts of oil-based contrast during HSG.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a retrospective data analysis of the H2Oil study, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing HSG with the use of oil- versus water-based contrast during fertility work-up. After an HSG with oil-based contrast, 214 women had an ongoing pregnancy within 6 months leading to a live birth compared to 155 women after HSG with water-based contrast.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Of the 369 women who had a live born infant, 208 consented to be approached for future research and 138 provided informed consent to collect data on the thyroid function tests of their offspring (n = 140). Thyroid function tests of these children were retrieved from the Dutch neonatal screening program, which includes the assessment of total thyroxine (T4) in all newborns, followed by thyroid-stimulating hormone only in those with a T4 level of ≤ −0.8 SD score. Furthermore, amount of contrast medium used and time between HSG and conception were compared between the two study groups.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Data were collected from 140 neonates conceived after HSG with oil-based (n = 76) or water-based (n = 64) contrast. The median T4 concentration was 87.0 nmol/l [76.0–96.0] in the oil group and 90.0 nmol/l [78.0–106.0] in the water group (P = 0.13). None of the neonates had a positive screening result for CH.

The median amount of contrast medium used was 9.0 ml [interquartile range (IQR), 6.0–11.8] in the oil-group and 10.0 ml [IQR, 7.5–14.0] in the water group (P = 0.43). No influence of the amount of contrast on the effect of contrast group on T4 concentrations was found (P-value for interaction, 0.37).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

A relatively small sample size and possible attrition at follow-up are limitations of this study. Although our results suggest that the use of iodinated contrast media for HSG is safe for the offspring, the impact of a decrease in maternal thyroid function on offspring neurodevelopment could not be excluded, as data on maternal thyroid function after HSG and during conception were lacking.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

As HSG with oil-based contrast does not affect thyroid function of the offspring, there is no reason to withhold this contrast to infertile women undergoing HSG. Future studies should investigate whether HSG with iodinated contrast influences the periconceptional maternal thyroid function and, consequently, offspring neurodevelopment.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study received no funding. The original H2Oil RCT was an investigator-initiated study that was funded by the two academic institutions (Academic Medical Center and VU University Medical Center) of the Amsterdam UMC. The funders had no role in study design, collection, analysis and intrepretation of the data. I.R. reports receiving travel fee from Guerbet. C.B.L. reports speakers fee from Ferring in the past and research grants from Ferring, Merck and Guerbet. K.D. reports receiving travel fee and speakers fee from Guerbet. B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548). B.W.M. reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck KGaA and Guerbet and travel and research grants from Merck KGaA and Guerbet. V.M. reports receiving travel fee and speakers fee as well as research grants from Guerbet. The other authors do not report conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Netherlands Trial Register NTR 7526 (Neonates born after the H2Oil study), NTR 3270 (original H2Oil study), www.trialregister.nl

Keywords: neonatal screening, hypothyroidism, neonatal health, hysterosalpingography, iodine, oil-based contrast medium, water-based contrast medium

Introduction

Hysterosalpingography (HSG), to assess tubal patency, is a standard test during female fertility work-up. Although it was introduced as a diagnostic tubal patency test, it recently became clear that HSG increases ongoing pregnancy rates, especially after the use of oil-based contrast (Fang et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019). All contrast media used for HSG are rich in iodine, with oil-based contrast containing more iodine (480 mg Iodine/ml) than water-based contrast (ranging from 240 to 300 mg Iodine/ml, depending on the manufacturer). In addition, the clearance of oil-based contrast in the abdomen is slower than that of water-based contrast (Brown et al., 1949; Miyamoto et al., 1995).

Previous studies found that HSG resulted in a long-lasting suppression of thyroid hormone synthesis in euthyroid women and, even more profoundly, in women with subclinical hypothyroidism (Mekaru et al., 2008; Kaneshige et al., 2015; So et al., 2017). Subclinical hypothyroidism has been associated with an increased risk of pregnancy complications, including pre-eclampsia, perinatal mortality and (recurrent) miscarriage (van den Boogaard et al., 2011; Korevaar et al., 2019). Up until now two subsequent systematic reviews showed no increased risk of miscarriage or stillbirth in women exposed to oil-based contrast at HSG, which is reassuring (Fang et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019).

There is some evidence showing that maternal iodine excess due to high dietary iodine intake or iodine-containing antiseptics may put offspring at risk of congenital hypothyroidism (CH) (l'Allemand et al., 1983; Nishiyama et al., 2004; Connelly et al., 2012; Hamby et al., 2018). To date, surprisingly few studies have focused on the impact of oil-based contrast during HSG on the neonatal thyroid function; all of them were conducted in Asian populations, who are known to consume diets rich in iodine. One study from Japan reported a high risk of CH (of 2.4%, as compared to 0.7% in the norm population) in neonates whose mothers were exposed to high amounts of oil-based contrast medium during HSG (Satoh et al., 2015). The other studies described associations between HSG and the presence of fetal goiter or transient thyroid dysfunction at birth, but not with permanent thyroid dysfunction (Omoto et al., 2013; Sasaki et al., 2017). Indeed, neonates born to mothers exposed to HSG had a higher urinary excretion of iodine (Li et al., 2018).

We recently published the results of a large randomized controlled trial (RCT; under the acronym H2Oil study) investigating the effects of oil- versus water-based contrast in women undergoing HSG as part of fertility work-up on live birth rates, indicating that the first was superior (Dreyer et al., 2017). The present study investigated the thyroid function in their offspring at birth.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective data analysis of neonatal screening results for CH in the offspring of mothers participating in the H2Oil study who conceived within 6 months after HSG (NTR 3270). For this purpose, neonatal screening results were retrieved from the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment (in Dutch: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu). This specific study (NTR 7526) was approved by the institutional review board of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre—VU University Medical Centre, the Netherlands (reference 2018.463, dated 7 September 2018).

Participants

The H2Oil study is a multicenter RCT comparing oil-based contrast (Lipiodol® Ultra Fluid, Guerbet France, containing 480 mg Iodine/ml) with water-based contrast (Telebrix Hystero®, Guerbet France, containing 250 mg Iodine/ml) in women undergoing HSG during fertility work-up. Details of the H2Oil study have been published elsewhere (Dreyer et al., 2017). Here, we only briefly describe the trial essentials. Infertile women between 18 and 39 years of age with spontaneous menstrual cycles were included in the H2Oil study. Known endocrine disorders (e.g. hyperthyroidism) were among the exclusion criteria. No routine screening of the thyroid function was performed.

A total of 1119 women were randomized to receive HSG with oil-based contrast (n = 557) or water-based contrast (n = 562) (Supplementary Figure S1). After HSG with oil-based contrast, within 6 months 214 women had an ongoing pregnancy leading to a live birth compared to 155 women after HSG water-based contrast (Dreyer et al., 2017). Of these women, 208 (56%) had given permission to be approached for future research.

Parents were approached by postal mail, containing information on this study. For the retrieval of the neonatal screening results, both parents or legal guardians had to give written informed consent. Additionally, they were also asked to provide additional information of the medical history of their child, including previous or current thyroid hormone supplementation. Parents who did not respond within 2 weeks were sent a reminder.

Study outcomes

The main outcome was the neonatal total thyroxine (T4) concentration (nmol/l). Other outcomes were, if available, concentrations of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) (mU/l) and thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG) (nmol/l).

Statistical analysis

Demographic characteristics of the study population were compared between the two study groups using the appropriate descriptive statistics. Categorical data were reported as absolute numbers with percentages (%)and continuous variables as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs). Dichotomous outcomes were compared using the χ2 test and continuous outcomes using the independent t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test as appropriate. We tested whether amount of contrast or time between HSG and conception modified the effect of contrast medium on neonatal T4 concentration. Effect modification by amount of contrast was tested using a linear regression model with T4 concentration as the dependent variable and amount of contrast, type of contrast (oil versus water) and their two-way interaction as independent variables. Effect modification by time between HSG and conception was tested using ANOVA with T4 concentrations as the dependent variable and time between HSG and conception, type of contrast (oil versus water) and their two-way interaction as independent variables. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Boxplot and scatterplot were used to visualize the investigated associations. The IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26.0 was used for all statistical analyses (IBM Corp., USA).

Neonatal CH screening

The Dutch neonatal screening for CH is primarily based on T4 measurement in filter paper blood spots obtained during the heel prick at 4 to 7 days after birth. Details of the Dutch CH screening program have been described by (Kempers et al., 2006). In summary, T4 concentrations are expressed as standard deviation score (SDS) from the daily mean. This is the standard screening procedure for CH in the Netherlands (Verkerk et al., 2014). The daily means are used instead of population reference means, to account for fluctuation in laboratory measurements. If the T4 level is −0.8 SDS or less, the TSH concentration is measured as well. This is accompanied by TBG concentration when T4 is −1.6 SDS or less. Newborns with abnormal screening results are immediately referred to a pediatrician. In case of a dubious result, a second heel prick is performed, after which the child is referred if the result is dubious again or abnormal.

Results

In the oil group, 75 (65.2%) of the 115 parents gave informed consent to collect data on the thyroid function tests of their children (n = 76). In the water group, 63 (67.7%) of the 93 parents gave informed consent to collect these data (n = 64; Fig. 1). The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups (Supplementary Table SI). Non-responders were not different from responders in baseline characteristics.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Flowchart of the study.

None of the neonates conceived after HSG with oil- or water-based contrast had a positive screening result for CH. Their data are presented in Table I. T4 concentrations and T4 SDSs were comparable between the two groups. None of the children were currently on thyroid hormone supplementation.

Table I.

Clinical data of neonates conceived after hysterosalpingography (HSG) with the use of oil- or water-based contrast.

Neonates born after HSG with
Oil contrast (n = 76) Water contrast (n = 64) P-value
 Gestational age (weeks) 39.7 [39.0–40.9] 39.6 [38.6–40.7] 0.27
 Birthweighta (grams) 3470 [3115–3855] 3460 [3065–3721] 0.67
 Sex
  Male 38 (50) 30 (47) 0.71
  Female 38 (50) 34 (53) -
 Current use of thyroid hormones 0 (0) 0 (0) -
 Neonatal screeningb
  T4 (nmol/l) 87.0 [76.0–96.0] 90.0 [78.0–106.0] 0.13
  T4 SDSc −0.05 [−0.5–0.5] 0.2 [−0.3–0.9] 0.12
 Amount of contrast (milliliter)d 9.0 [6.0–11.8] 10.0 [7.5–14.0] 0.43
 Iodine dose (grams)e 4.3 [2.9–5.7] 2.5 [1.9–3.5] 0.001
 Duration between HSG and conception (months) 2.3 [1.1–4.3] 2.1 [1.1–4.0] 0.83
 Duration between HSG and delivery (months) 11.1 [9.6–13.0] 10.7 [9.8–12.9] 0.73
Open in a new tab

Data presented as median [quartiles] or number of women (%).

aBirth weight was missing in one neonate in the water group.

bNeonatal screening result was missing in one neonate in the water group, due to neonatal screening abroad.

cThe concentration of T4 is expressed as standard deviation score (SDS) and is compared with the daily mean.

dAmount of contrast was missing in 32 in the oil group versus 39 women in the water group.

eThe calculated iodine dose is strictly correlated to the amount of contrast medium used (Lipiodol® 480 mg Iodine/ml and Telebrix Hystero® 250 mg Iodine/ml).

The amount of contrast used for HSG was reported in 44 women in the oil group versus 25 women in the water group. The median amount of contrast was 9.0 ml [IQR, 6.0–11.8] in the oil group and 10.0 ml [IQR, 7.5–14.0] in the water group (P = 0.43). Linear regression showed no influence of the amount of contrast on the effect of the contrast group on T4 concentrations (P-value for interaction 0.37). Figure 2a and b depict the association of neonatal T4 concentrations with the amounts of oil-based or water-based contrast used during HSG.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Association of neonatal T4 level with the amount of contrast used for (A) oil-based contrast and (B) water-based contrast. The scatterplots show the association of neonatal T4 concentrations with the amount of (A) oil-based contrast versus (B) water-based contrast used during HSG. Both scatterplots show the linear regression lines (solid lines) with their uncertainty (dotted lines).

There was a significant difference in iodine dose between the two contrast media used (4.3 grams [IQR, 2.9–5.7] versus 2.5 [IQR, 1.9–3.5]; P = 0.001).

Time between HSG and conception was comparable between the oil and water groups (2.3 months [IQR, 1.1–4.3] and 2.1 months [IQR, 1.1–4.0]; P = 0.83). ANOVA showed no influence of time between HSG and conception on the effect of the contrast group on T4 concentrations (P-value for interaction 0.47).

Consequently, time between HSG and delivery did not differ between the two groups (11.1 months [IQR, 9.6–13.0] in the oil group versus 10.7 months [IQR, 9.8–12.9] in the water group; P-value 0.73).

However, in 13 neonates in the oil group and 7 neonates in the water group, T4 SDSs were ≤ −0.8 and, therefore, TSH was measured (relative risk (RR), 1.5; 95% CI, 0.7–3.6; P = 0.32). TSH concentrations were within normal limits for all 20 neonates with T4 SDSs ≤ −0.8. In one neonate in the oil group, TBG was additionally measured. Both TBG and T4/TBG ratio were within normal limits. Table II shows no differences in the oil group in amount of contrast or duration between HSG and conception among neonates with normal screening results and those with T4 values ≤ −0.8 SD, low enough to trigger TSH testing. We found comparable results for the water group (Table II).

Table II.

Clinical data of neonates with normal T4 or T4 ⩽ −0.8 SD in the oil (n = 76) and water (n = 64) group.

Neonates in the oil group Neonates in the water group
Normal T4
> − 0.8 SD
(n = 63) 		T4
≤ − 0.8 SD
(n = 13) 		P-value Normal T4
> − 0.8 SD
(n = 56) 		T4
≤ − 0.8 SD
(n = 7) 		P-value
 Neonatal screening
  T4 (nmol/l) 88.0 [81.0–102.0] 61.0 [54.5–70.5] - 92.0 [84.0–106.0] 68.0 [63.0–71.0] -
  T4 SDSf 0.2 [−0.2–0.7] −1.1 [−1.4−−0.9] - 0.3 [−0.2–1.0] -0.9 [−1.1– −0.8] -
  TSHg(mU/l) - 2.0 [1.0–2.5] - - 1.0 [1.0–2.0] -
 Amount of contrast (ml)h 9.0 [6.0–11.0] 10.0 [6.3–20.0] 0.53 10.0 [7.0–14.0] 8.0 [8.0–11.5] 1.00
 Iodine dose (grams)i 4.3 [2.9–5.3] 4.8 [3.0–9.6] 0.53 2.5 [1.7–3.5] 2.0 [2.0–2.9] 1.00
 Duration between HSG and conception (months) 2.4 [1.1–4.5] 1.9 [0.7–3.5] 0.36 2.2 [1.1–4.1] 1.9 [1.2–2.9] 0.58
 Duration between HSG and delivery (months) 11.2 [9.6–13.3] 10.8 [9.1–12.1] 0.16 10.9 [9.8–13.0] 10.6 [9.7–11.6] 0.56
Open in a new tab

Data presented as median [quartiles].

fThe concentration of T4 is expressed as SDS and is compared with the daily mean.

gT4 values ≤ − 0.8 SD, low enough to trigger TSH testing.

hAmount of contrast was missing in 26 versus 6 women in the oil-group and 35 versus 4 women in the water-group.

iThe calculated iodine dose is strictly correlated to the amount of contrast medium used (Lipiodol® 480 mg Iodine/ml and Telebrix Hystero® 250 mg Iodine/ml).

Furthermore, no differences were seen in amount of contrast or duration between HSG and conception within the neonates with T4 ≤ −0.8 SDS in the oil group versus the water group.

Discussion

In this study, we found that preconceptional exposure to an HSG with oil-based or water-based contrast did not result in decreased thyroid function in the offspring. In addition, we did not find an impact of the amount of contrast used or the duration between HSG and conception on neonatal T4 concentration between the treatment arms. Our results are not in line with previous studies in East Asian populations.

A Japanese study found a higher frequency of thyroid dysfunction in newborns conceived after HSG compared to normative data (2.4% versus 0.7%; Satoh et al., 2015). In this study, mothers giving birth to offspring with thyroid dysfunction had been exposed to a higher amount of contrast during HSG (median of 20 ml versus 8 ml), although used amount was only available for 112 out of 212 neonates with normal thyroid function and for 3 out of 5 neonates with thyroid dysfunction (Satoh et al., 2015). To the best of our knowledge, only two Japanese cases with fetal goiter after maternal HSG were reported (Omoto et al., 2013; Sasaki et al., 2017), although according to Omoto et al. (2013) ‘at least 17 cases of transient hypothyroidism in a fetus after HSG have been reported in Japanese literature since 1990’. In one of these fetuses, the goiter resolved during pregnancy and the thyroid function tests were normal at birth (Sasaki et al., 2017). In the other the fetal goiter persisted and overt hypothyroidism was noted at birth. This was followed by a spontaneous resolution of the goiter by 4 weeks post-partum along with normalization of thyroid function tests in the preceding weeks (Omoto et al., 2013). None of the children in our sample were diagnosed with goiter as newborns.

As stated earlier, all studies conducted thus far were limited to East Asian populations. There is a striking difference in background risk for CH between Japan and the Netherlands, i.e. 0.7% in Japan versus 0.05% in the Netherlands (Tokyo Health Service Association, 2010; Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment, 2014). Among the possible explanations for this difference is the high consumption of iodine-rich foods (i.e. seaweed) in Japan. It has been estimated that the iodine intake of pregnant women in Japan is approximately 3–4 times as high as the World health Organization recommendation (World Health Organization, 2007; Fuse et al., 2013).

Strengths and limitations

The current study has several strengths and limitations. The major strengths are that this study was based on a large multicenter RCT and had included a large majority of Caucasian women. Additionally, in contrast to other countries, which generally have TSH-based screening programs, the Dutch neonatal screening program for CH is T4-TSH-TBG based, being able to detect CH of both central and thyroidal origin. The amount of contrast used during HSG was reported, instead of the calculated iodine dose, as the amount of contrast is relevant for clinicians in daily practice and iodine dose is strictly correlated to the amount of contrast used.

Limitations of our study are the relatively small sample size and attrition at follow-up. This might obscure a possible relation between the type of contrast medium and the presence of CH if women with excessive iodine exposure selectively declined to participate. However, a non-response analysis showed that responders and non-responders did not differ in a number of the baseline characteristics, implicating that non-response bias is unlikely to have materially influenced our observations, although the amount of contrast used was not known from all participants. The H2Oil RCT was not powered to study the safety in neonates of the different types of iodinated contrast media during HSG. Nonetheless, data regarding the neonatal thyroid function are reliable even though they were collected retrospectively.

Furthermore, only offspring conceived within 6 months after HSG were included (Dreyer et al., 2017). Offspring conceived between 6 months and 5 years after HSG, who also took part in the H2Oil follow-up study, were not contacted for this specific study (van Rijswijk et al., 2018). It is unlikely that iodinated contrast could still affect the offspring’s thyroid function when more time than 6 months has elapsed between HSG and conception (Kaneshige et al., 2015; So et al., 2017).

Our study did not include an assessment of the maternal thyroid function after HSG or during conception. Consequently, it was impossible to study the impact of a decrease in the maternal thyroid function on offspring neurodevelopment. Studies in East Asian populations demonstrated that HSG could result in a long-lasting suppression in thyroid hormone synthesis in euthyroid women and, even more profoundly, in women with subclinical hypothyroidism (Mekaru et al., 2008; Kaneshige et al., 2015; So et al., 2017). Furthermore, the use of iodine-rich products preconceptionally during pregnancy or after delivery was not registered, which could potentially influence our findings.

Implications

Overexposure to iodine may result in a sudden cessation of thyroid hormone synthesis, a phenomenon called the Wolff–Chaikoff effect (Eng et al., 1999). This protective mechanism works for a couple of days, after which thyroid hormone synthesis is resumed. However, during prolonged exposure to excess iodine, the thyroid gland is unable to escape from the Wolff–Chaikoff effect, resulting in a long-lasting suppression of thyroid hormone synthesis (Wolff et al., 1949; Markou et al., 2001; Leung and Braverman, 2012).

From the second trimester of pregnancy the fetal thyroid gland starts to produce thyroid hormones. Therefore, during early embryonic development the fetal brain depends entirely on the supply of maternal thyroid hormones (Contempre et al., 1993; Burrow et al., 1994). Consequently, overexposure to iodine may not only disrupt fetal brain development through inhibition of fetal thyroid hormone synthesis but also through its effects on the maternal thyroid gland. This is suggested by an increasing body of evidence demonstrating that children born to mothers with decreased thyroid function during the first half of pregnancy had reductions in the achievement of developmental milestones, IQ score, reaction time, scholastic performance and attention, although the evidence was not unequivocal (Haddow et al., 1999; Pop et al., 1999; Smit et al., 2000; Pop et al., 2003; Oken et al., 2009; Henrichs et al., 2010; Li et al., 2010; Craig et al., 2012; Noten et al., 2015; Oostenbroek et al., 2017; Thompson et al., 2018). Therefore, monitoring of the maternal thyroid function after HSG might seem warranted, but at this point no definite conclusion can be drawn.

Conclusion

In contrast to previous research in East Asian populations, we found that preconceptional HSG with iodinated contrast did not influence neonatal thyroid function. Although this suggests that iodinated contrast media are safe for the offspring, indirect effects on neurodevelopment (through inhibition of maternal thyroid hormone synthesis) could not be excluded and warrant further investigation. Meanwhile, there is no reason to withhold HSG with oil-based contrast to infertile women. We recommend keeping the amount of contrast used as low as possible.

Supplementary Material

fig1_deaa049
Click here for additional data file. (472.5KB, pdf)
table1_deaa049
Click here for additional data file. (71.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank all participating parents and their children, the hospitals and their staff, the research nurses and the staff of the nationwide consortium for women’s health research (NVOG Consortium; www.zorgevaluatienederland.nl) for logistic support. Furthermore, the employees of the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment (in Dutch: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu) are gratefully acknowledged for all the efforts made to send us the data of all included neonates. We thank H2Oil study group collaborators N. van Geloven, J.W.R. Twisk, P.G.A. Hompes and P.M. van de Ven for their contributions to this study.

A. Appendix

A.1. H2Oil Study Group members

P. Bourdrez, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL, Venlo, the Netherlands; J.P. de Bruin, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat 1, 5223 GZ, ‘s Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands; A.J.C.M. van Dongen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP, Ede, the Netherlands; A.E.J. Duijn, Vrouwenkliniek Zuidoost, Bijlmerdreef 998–1000, 1103 JT Amsterdam, the Netherlands; A.P. Gijsen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elkerliek Hospital, Wesselmanlaan 25, 5707 HA, Helmond, the Netherlands; M. Goddijn, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; R.J.T. van Golde, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht UMC, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands; C.F. van Heteren, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; A. Hoek, Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, the Netherlands; M.H.A. van Hooff, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Franciscus Hospital, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; A.B. Hooker, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zaans Medical Centre, Koningin Julianaplein 58, 1502 DV, Zaandam, the Netherlands; M. Kaplan, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Röpcke-Zweers Hospital, Jan Weitkamplaan 4A, 7772 SE, Hardenberg, the Netherlands; C.H. de Koning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tergooi Hospital, Rijksstraatweg 1, 1261 AN, Blaricum, the Netherlands; M.J. Lambers, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dijklander Hospital, Maelsonstraat 3, 1624 NP, Hoorn, the Netherlands; A. Mozes, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amstelland Hospital, Laan van de Helende Meesters 8, 1186 AM, Amstelveen, the Netherlands; A.W. Nap, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD Arnhem, the Netherlands; M.J. Pelinck, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Scheper Hospital, Boermarkeweg 60, 7824AA, Emmen, the Netherlands; H.G.M. Rijnsaardt-Lukassen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT, Dordrecht, the Netherlands; I.A.J. van Rooij, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC Tilburg, the Netherlands; A.V. Sluijmer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Hospital, Europaweg-Zuid 1, 9401 RK, Assen, the Netherlands; J.M.J. Smeenk, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC Tilburg, the Netherlands; C.C.M. Timmerman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bravis Hospital, Boerhaavelaan 25, 4708 AE, Roosendaal, the Netherlands; M.A.F. Traas, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334 DZ, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands; R. Tros, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; G.A. van Unnik, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alrijne Hospital, Houtlaan 55, 2334 CK, Leiden, the Netherlands; H.R. Verhoeve, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, OLVG, Oosterpark 9, 1091 AC Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Authors’ roles

N.W., K.D., V.M., M.J.J.F., C.B.L. and B.W.J.M. designed this study. N.W. and M.P. collected the data. N.W. performed the analysis and wrote the first draft. N.W., I.R., C.K., C.B.L., B.W.J.M., K.D., M.J.J.F. and V.M. interpreted the data and critically discussed and structured the manuscript. N.W. is the first author of this manuscript. B.W.J.M. was the principle investigator of the original H2Oil study. K.D. and J.R. coordinated the original H2Oil study and collected data regarding the women in the original H2Oil study. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript. All authors have approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received no funding. The original H2Oil RCT was an investigator-initiated study that was funded by the two academic institutions (Academic Medical Center and VU University Medical Center) of the Amsterdam UMC. The funders had no role in study design, collection, analysis and intrepretation of the data.

Conflict of interest

I.R. reports receiving travel fee from Guerbet. C.B.L. reports speakers fee from Ferring in the past and research grants from Ferring, Merck and Guerbet. K.D. reports receiving travel fee and speakers fee from Guerbet. B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548). B.W.M. reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck KGaA and Guerbet and travel and research grants from Merck KGaA and Guerbet. V.M. reports receiving travel fee and speakers fee as well as research grants from Guerbet. The other authors do not report conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Brown WE, Jennings AF, Bradbury JT. The absorption of radiopaque substances used in hysterosalpingography; a comparative study of various aqueous and oily media. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1949;58:1041–1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burrow GN, Fisher DA, Larsen PR. Maternal and fetal thyroid function. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1072–1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Connelly KJ, Boston BA, Pearce EN, Sesser D, Snyder D, Braverman LE, Pino S, LaFranchi SH. Congenital hypothyroidism caused by excess prenatal maternal iodine ingestion. J Pediatr 2012;161:760–762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Contempre B, Jauniaux E, Calvo R, Jurkovic D, Campbell S, de Escobar GM. Detection of thyroid hormones in human embryonic cavities during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;77:1719–1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Craig WY, Allan WC, Kloza EM, Pulkkinen AJ, Waisbren S, Spratt DI, Palomaki GE, Neveux LM, Haddow JE. Mid-gestational maternal free thyroxine concentration and offspring neurocognitive development at age two years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:E22–E28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dreyer K, van Rijswijk J, Mijatovic V, Goddijn M, Verhoeve HR, van Rooij IAJ, Hoek A, Bourdrez P, Nap AW, Rijnsaardt-Lukassen HGM et al. Oil-based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women. N Engl J Med 2017;376:2043–2052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment Congenital hypothyroidism (CH): information regarding neonatal heel prick screening program (in Dutch: Congenitale hypothyroidie (CH): informatie in het kader van de neonatale hielprikscreening). 2014.
  8. Eng PH, Cardona GR, Fang SL, Previti M, Alex S, Carrasco N, Chin WW, Braverman LE. Escape from the acute Wolff-Chaikoff effect is associated with a decrease in thyroid sodium/iodide symporter messenger ribonucleic acid and protein. Endocrinology 1999;140:3404–3410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fang F, Bai Y, Zhang Y, Faramand A. Oil-based versus water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 2018;110:153–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fuse Y, Shishiba Y, Irie M. Gestational changes of thyroid function and urinary iodine in thyroid antibody-negative Japanese women. Endocr J 2013;60:1095–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Allan WC, Williams JR, Knight GJ, Gagnon J, O'Heir CE, Mitchell ML, Hermos RJ, Waisbren SE et al. Maternal thyroid deficiency during pregnancy and subsequent neuropsychological development of the child. N Engl J Med 1999;341:549–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamby T, Kunnel N, Dallas JS, Wilson DP. Maternal iodine excess: an uncommon cause of acquired neonatal hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2018;31:1061–1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henrichs J, Bongers-Schokking JJ, Schenk JJ, Ghassabian A, Schmidt HG, Visser TJ, Hooijkaas H, Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM, Hofman A, Jaddoe VV et al. Maternal thyroid function during early pregnancy and cognitive functioning in early childhood: the generation R study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:4227–4234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaneshige T, Arata N, Harada S, Ohashi T, Sato S, Umehara N, Saito T, Saito H, Murashima A, Sago H. Changes in serum iodine concentration, urinary iodine excretion and thyroid function after hysterosalpingography using an oil-soluble iodinated contrast medium (lipiodol). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:E469–E472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kempers MJ, Lanting CI, van Heijst AF, van Trotsenburg AS, Wiedijk BM, de Vijlder JJ, Vulsma T. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism based on thyroxine, thyrotropin, and thyroxine-binding globulin measurement: potentials and pitfalls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:3370–3376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Korevaar TIM, Derakhshan A, Taylor PN, Meima M, Chen L, Bliddal S, Carty DM, Meems M, Vaidya B, Shields B et al. Association of thyroid function test abnormalities and thyroid autoimmunity with preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2019;322:632–641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. l'Allemand D, Gruters A, Heidemann P, Schurnbrand P. Iodine-induced alterations of thyroid function in newborn infants after prenatal and perinatal exposure to povidone iodine. J Pediatr 1983;102:935–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Leung AM, Braverman LE. Iodine-induced thyroid dysfunction. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2012;19:414–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li R, Liu Y, Ma L, Qiu L, Han J. Excessive exposure to iodine in pregnancy merits attention: a pilot follow-up study. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018;143:175–176. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li Y, Shan Z, Teng W, Yu X, Li Y, Fan C, Teng X, Guo R, Wang H, Li J et al. Abnormalities of maternal thyroid function during pregnancy affect neuropsychological development of their children at 25-30 months. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2010;72:825–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Markou K, Georgopoulos N, Kyriazopoulou V, Vagenakis AG. Iodine-induced hypothyroidism. Thyroid 2001;11:501–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mekaru K, Kamiyama S, Masamoto H, Sakumoto K, Aoki Y. Thyroid function after hysterosalpingography using an oil-soluble iodinated contrast medium. Gynecol Endocrinol 2008;24:498–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miyamoto Y, Tsujimoto T, Iwai K, Ishida K, Uchimoto R, Miyazawa T, Azuma H. Safety and pharmacokinetics of iotrolan in hysterosalpingography. Retention and irritability compared with Lipiodol. Invest Radiol 1995;30:538–543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nishiyama S, Mikeda T, Okada T, Nakamura K, Kotani T, Hishinuma A. Transient hypothyroidism or persistent hyperthyrotropinemia in neonates born to mothers with excessive iodine intake. Thyroid 2004;14:1077–1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Noten AM, Loomans EM, Vrijkotte TG, Ven PM, Trotsenburg AS, Rotteveel J, Eijsden M, Finken MJ. Maternal hypothyroxinaemia in early pregnancy and school performance in 5-year-old offspring. Eur J Endocrinol 2015;173:563–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oken E, Braverman LE, Platek D, Mitchell ML, Lee SL, Pearce EN. Neonatal thyroxine, maternal thyroid function, and child cognition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:497–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Omoto A, Kurimoto C, Minagawa M, Shozu M. A case of fetal goiter that resolved spontaneously after birth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:3910–3911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Oostenbroek MHW, Kersten RHJ, Tros B, Kunst AE, Vrijkotte TGM, Finken MJJ. Maternal hypothyroxinaemia in early pregnancy and problem behavior in 5-year-old offspring. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2017;81:29–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pop VJ, Brouwers EP, Vader HL, Vulsma T, Baar AL, Vijlder JJ. Maternal hypothyroxinaemia during early pregnancy and subsequent child development: a 3-year follow-up study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2003;59:282–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pop VJ, Kuijpens JL, Baar AL, Verkerk G, Son MM, Vijlder JJ, Vulsma T, Wiersinga WM, Drexhage HA, Vader HL. Low maternal free thyroxine concentrations during early pregnancy are associated with impaired psychomotor development in infancy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1999;50:149–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasaki Y, Kikuchi A, Murai M, Kanasugi T, Isurugi C, Oyama R, Sugiyama T. Fetal goiter associated with preconception hysterosalpingography using an oil-soluble iodinated contrast medium. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;49:275–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Satoh M, Aso K, Katagiri Y. Thyroid dysfunction in neonates born to mothers who have undergone hysterosalpingography involving an oil-soluble iodinated contrast medium. Horm Res Paediatr 2015;84:370–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smit BJ, Kok JH, Vulsma T, Briet JM, Boer K, Wiersinga WM. Neurologic development of the newborn and young child in relation to maternal thyroid function. Acta Paediatr 2000;89:291–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. So S, Yamaguchi W, Tajima H, Nakayama T, Tamura N, Kanayama N, Tawara F. The effect of oil and water-soluble contrast medium in hysterosalpingography on thyroid function. Gynecol Endocrinol 2017;33:682–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thompson W, Russell G, Baragwanath G, Matthews J, Vaidya B, Thompson-Coon J. Maternal thyroid hormone insufficiency during pregnancy and risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2018;88:575–584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tokyo-Health-Service-Association Activity report Tokyo health service association. 2010;39:133. [Google Scholar]
  37. van den Boogaard E, Vissenberg R, Land JA, Wely M, Post JA, Goddijn M, Bisschop PH. Significance of (sub)clinical thyroid dysfunction and thyroid autoimmunity before conception and in early pregnancy: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:605–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. van Rijswijk J, van Welie N, Dreyer K, Verhoeve H, Hoek A, De Bruin JP, Nap A, Van Hooff M, Goddijn M, Hooker A et al. Tubal flushing with oil-or water-based contrast medium at hysterosalpingography for infertility: 3-year outcome of a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 2018;33:i53. [Google Scholar]
  39. Verkerk PH, van Trotsenburg AS, Hoorweg-Nijman JJ, Oostdijk W, van Tijn DA, Kempers MJ, van den Akker EL, Loeber JG, Elvers LH, Vulsma T. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism: more than 30 years of experience in the Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2014;158:A6564. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang R, van Welie N, van Rijswijk J, Johnson NP, Norman RJ, Dreyer K, Mijatovic V, Mol BW. Effectiveness on fertility outcome of tubal flushing with different contrast media: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:172–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wolff J, Chaikoff IL et al. The temporary nature of the inhibitory action of excess iodine on organic iodine synthesis in the normal thyroid. Endocrinology, 513 1949;45:504.illust. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. World Health Organization UNCsFICftCoIDD Assessment of Iodine Deficiency Disorders and Monitoring their Elimination, 3rd edn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

fig1_deaa049
Click here for additional data file. (472.5KB, pdf)
table1_deaa049
Click here for additional data file. (71.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES