Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233794

Sequencing B cell receptors from ferrets (Mustela putorius furo)

Julius Wong 1, Celeste M Tai 2, Aeron C Hurt 2, Hyon-Xhi Tan 1, Stephen J Kent 1,3,4,*, Adam K Wheatley 1,4,*
Editor: Stephen Mark Tompkins5
PMCID: PMC7259655  PMID: 32470013

Abstract

The domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo) provides a critical animal model to study human respiratory diseases. However immunological insights are restricted due to a lack of ferret-specific reagents and limited genetic information about ferret B and T cell receptors. Here, variable, diversity and joining genes within the ferret kappa, lambda and heavy chain immunoglobulin loci were annotated using available genomic information. A multiplex PCR approach was derived that facilitated the recovery of paired heavy and light chain immunoglobulin sequences from single sorted ferret B cells, allowing validation of predicted germline gene sequences and the identification of putative novel germlines. Eukaryotic expression vectors were developed that enabled the generation of recombinant ferret monoclonal antibodies. This work advances the ferret as an informative immunological model for viral diseases by allowing the in-depth interrogation of antibody-based immunity.

Introduction

Effective humoral immunity is contingent upon the phenomenal diversity of antibodies. In mammals, this is derived via genetic recombination of numerous variable (V), diversity (D) and joining (J) gene segments localised to heavy, kappa and lambda immunoglobulin loci. In recent years, the capacity to clone and express antibodies from single B cells has proved a powerful tool to study antibody repertoires in a variety of infectious disease settings in humans [14], and important animal models such as mice [5, 6] and non-human primates [7, 8]. These approaches have subsequently been extended using next-generation sequencing platforms (reviewed in [9, 10]), allowing unprecedented depth in the characterisation of anti-pathogen antibody responses.

The domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo) is a critical mammalian model to study pathogenesis and evaluate vaccines against a variety of human respiratory pathogens (reviewed in [11]), most critically influenza. However, the majority of influenza research using ferrets is focused upon viral transmission and/or pathogenesis, with in-depth immunological studies limited by a limited understanding of the ferret immune system (reviewed in [12]). A key knowledge gap surrounds the immunogenetics of ferret immunoglobulins. While the ferret genome was recently sequenced [13] accurate annotation of germline immunoglobulin genes is currently incomplete. This has hindered the ability to sequence ferret B cell receptors and/or allow the recovery of ferret monoclonal antibodies, limiting detailed interrogation of ferret serological responses that informs current influenza vaccine strain selection efforts.

Here we sought to increase the utility of ferrets for studying humoral immunity. Ferret heavy, kappa and lambda immunoglobulin loci were annotated using available genomic sequences, allowing the design of a novel set of multiplex PCR primers flanking recombined ferret immunoglobulin genes. Recombined B cell receptor sequences were recovered from single sorted ferret B cells, partially confirming our initial gene segment annotation and allowing identification of potential novel germlines. Ferret immunoglobulin constant gene sequences were confirmed using de-novo assembly of RNA-seq transcripts, allowing the design of expression plasmids and the recombinant production of ferret IgG monoclonal antibodies. In summary, we present a single-cell, RT-PCR based approach for recovery of B cell receptor immunoglobulins from ferret B cells and the recombinant production of ferret monoclonal antibodies in vitro, analogous to methodologies in widespread use in rodents and primates.

Materials and methods

Annotation of ferret immunoglobulin loci

Ferret genomic contigs containing potential immunoglobulin genes were retrieved from e!Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org). (Immunoglobulin heavy loci—GL897360.1, GL897427.1, GL897453.1, GL897498.1, GL897556.1, GL897558.1, GL897564.1, GL897795.1, GL898421.1; kappa loci—GL896905.1; lambda loci—GL897406.1, AEYP01111698.1, GL896906.1, AEYP011112098.1, GL897285.1, GL897406.1, GL897344.1, GL897565.1, GL897418.1, AEYP01110728.1, AEYP01108526.1, GL897638.1 GL897285.1, GL897484.1, GL897019.1, GL897400.1). Iterative BLAST searches using human, and then ferret immunoglobulin gene segments were used to identify and annotate putative germline genes. Ferret immunoglobulin gene sequences were analysed with reference to human, mouse or canine databases using IMGT/V-Quest [14] and assigned to mammalian clans based upon phylogenetic analyses. Sequences with nonsense mutations and/or non-functional regulatory elements were considered pseudogenes. Phylogenetic relationships of functional V genes were determined based on the Jukes-Cantor model. Consensus phylogenetic trees were built using the Neighbour-Joining method with no outgroups and resampled by bootstrapping using Geneious tree builder (10.1.3). Ferret V, D, J and constant gene sequences have been uploaded to Genbank.

Flow cytometric sorting of single ferret B-lymphocytes

Ferret studies and related experimental procedures were approved and conducted in accordance to the University of Melbourne Animal Care and Use Standards by the relevant ethics committee (#CT-FER-17-05). Single cell suspensions were prepared from the spleen of immunologically naïve ferrets. PBMCs were purified using 95% Ficoll-Paque Plus and cryopreserved in heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS) containing 10% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). Cryopreserved ferret PBMCs were thawed, stained with Live/Dead Fixable Aqua (Thermo Fisher), surface stains anti-CD11b-BV510 (Biolegend: clone M1/70), anti-CD8-BV450 (Thermo Fisher: clone OKT8) and anti-ferret IgA/IgM/IgG-FITC (Rockland Immunochemicals cat.618-102-130). Stained cells were resuspended in OptiMEM (Thermo Fisher) before single, live, surface Immunoglobulin positive B cells were sorted into 96-well PCR plates and stored at -20°C.

For the recovery of antigen-specific ferret B cells, a single ferret was infected with 1000 TCID50 of H1N1 A/California/04/2009 and a single cell suspension of parapharyngeal lymph node cells (pLN) was prepared at 28 days post-infection and cryopreserved in heat-inactivated FCS containing 10% DMSO. Cells were subsequently thawed and stained with Live/Dead Fixable Aqua (Thermo Fisher), surface stains anti-CD11b-BV510 (Biolegend: clone M1/70), anti-ferret IgA/IgM/IgG-FITC (Rockland Immunochemicals cat.618-102-130), anti-CD8 eFluor450 (eBioscience Clone OKT8) and a prototype IgD Mab conjugated to APC-Cy7,. Biotinylated recombinant full length A/California/04/2009 hemagglutinin (HA) probes [15] conjugated to streptavidin-PE or streptavidin-APC (Invitrogen) were used to sort single HA-specific B cells into 96-well plates and stored at -20°C.

Ferret B cell receptor (BCR) sequencing

A B cell receptor (BCR) sequencing protocol was developed based upon the multiplex nested RT-PCR approaches previous described for humans [1] and mice [5]. Reverse transcription of total cellular RNA from single sorted ferret B cells was performed in 25μL reaction volumes in the sort plate using 450 ng random hexamers (Bioline), 50 U Superscript III (Thermo Fisher), 1X First Strand buffer (Thermo Fisher), 8 U RNAsin (Promega), 0.125pmol Dithiothreitol (DTT) (Thermo Fisher), 0.8% v/v IGEPAL CA-630 (Sigma Aldrich) and 0.8mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) (Bioline). Cycling conditions for cDNA synthesis were: 42°C for 10 min, 25°C for 10mins, 50°C for 60 mins and 94°C for 5min. 3μL of cDNA was used as template in multiplex nested PCR reactions to amplify paired recombined ferret heavy and light chain (IgK, IgL) sequences. Primary reactions were carried out in 50μL volumes using Hotstart Taq plus polymerase (Qiagen), 1X reaction buffer, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 0.1mM dNTP (Bioline) and 5 nmol each of primary forward and reverse primer pools (S1 Table). 4μL of primary PCR product was used as template in a secondary, nested PCR (50 μL volume) containing 1 X reaction buffer, 1.5mM MgCl2, 1 x solution Q and 5 nmol secondary forward and reverse primer pools (S1 Table). For recovery of antigen-specific B cells from an infected ferret, the protocol was amended by substituting primary and secondary heavy chain reverse primer pools with 5 nmol reverse primer binding in the heavy chain joining gene (IGHJ) (S1 Table). Cycling conditions for both heavy and light chain amplification are as follows: Primary PCR: 95°C for 5 mins, 50 cycles of 95°C for 30s, 55°C for 30s and 72°C for 55s. Final extension for 7 mins at 72°C. Secondary PCR: 95°C for 5 mins, 50 cycles of 95°C for 30s, 50°C for 30s and 72°C for 60s. Final extension for 7 mins at 72°C. PCR products were visualised by agarose gel electrophoresis prior to standard purification and standard sanger sequencing using the reverse constant chain primer (IgM, IgK, IgL) from the secondary amplification steps or the IGHJ reverse primer.

Immunoglobulin gene sequence analysis

Full length VH, Vκ and Vλ sequences recovered from single sorted ferret B-cells were analysed using IMGT/High V-Quest. As well-validated germline ferret immunoglobulin sequences are not yet available, sequences were compared against dog (Canis lupus familiaris) germline immunoglobulin sequences to identify V(D)J segments with the highest identity. CDR-H3 sequences were determined by counting amino acid residues immediately after framework region 3 starting from the conserved cysteine (C) residue and ending with a conserved tryptophan (W) or phenylalanine (F).

De-novo transcriptome assembly by RNA-Seq

RNA was extracted from five million cryopreserved PBMCs derived from a single ferret spleen using RNeasy Plus micro Kit (Qiagen). mRNA libraries were prepared using Illumina Truseq Stranded mRNA kit and 100bp single end reads were obtained using an Illumina HiSeq 3000. Analysis was performed using Galaxy (https://usegalaxy.org) [16]. Sequences were filtered (Q>30) and trimmed (Trim) to remove illumina adapter sequences. Contigs were assembled de-novo with > 40 bp minimum read overlap for path extension using Trinity [17]. Contigs were aligned to ferret genomic sequences or alternatively, canine immunoglobulin constant region homologues, using MAGIC-BLAST [18] to identify putative constant genes. Ferret constant region gene sequences were then aligned to human and canine homologues using Geneious 10.1.3.

Cloning and expression of chimeric human/ferret and fully ferret monoclonal antibodies

Validated ferret IgG, and kappa and lambda constant domain sequences were synthesized (Geneart) and cloned into established human IgG1 and light chain eukaryotic expression vectors [1] using SalI/BamHI (IgG1), XhoI/BamHI (Lambda) or BsiWI/BamHI (Kappa) restriction digests, agarose gel purification and T4 DNA ligation (NEB:New England Biolabs).

Recombined heavy chain (VDJ) and lambda chain (VJ) sequences of the human anti-HA antibody CR9114 [19] or of recovered HA-specific ferret antibodies were synthesized (Geneart) and cloned into ferret IgG1 and lambda chain expression vectors using flanking AgeI/SalI (IgG) and AgeI/XhoI (lambda) restriction enzymes (NEB). Plasmid DNA was prepared using standard MIDI or MEGA kits (Qiagen).

For recombinant expression, heavy and lamdba chain expression plasmids were co-transfected into Expi293F cells using Expifectamine (Thermo Fisher). Briefly Expi293F cells were grown to a density of 2.5 x 106 cells/mL and transfected with 100 μg each of heavy and light chain expression plasmids complexed with 270 μL of Expifectamine. After addition of transfection enhancers 16 hours post-transfection, culture supernatants were harvested 5 days post-transfection, clarified by high speed centrifugation (5000 g, 4°C, 15 min) and filtration (0.22μm). Antibodies were purified using Pierce Protein A agarose (Thermo Fisher). Briefly, supernatants were equilibrated with Protein A IgG binding buffer and loaded into purification columns packed with 0.2mL of equilibrated Protein A agarose. Bound antibody was washed using Protein A IgG binding buffer (Thermo Fisher), and eluted with 15mL IgG elution buffer (Thermo Fisher) and neutralised with 1.5mL 1M TE buffer pH8.0 (Merck). Antibodies were concentrated via centrifugation (100 kDa Amicon; Merck Millipore at 3000g, 4°C, 15 min), resuspended in PBS and analysed using SDS-PAGE. Samples were denatured in 1x SDS loading buffer containing 5% v/v β-mercaptoethanol at 95°C for 15 min, resolved using 16.5% precast polyacrylamide gel (Biorad) in 1 x SDS buffer (Biorad), fixed (40% Ethanol; 10% acetic acid) and stained with colloidal Coomassie blue (Biorad).

Influenza hemagglutinin (HA) ELISA

96-well ELISA plates were coated with 400ng per well of full length recombinant CA09 HA at 4°C overnight. Wells were then blocked with 2.5% BSA/PBS for 1h at room temperature and washed with PBS-Tween (0.05%) five times. Four-fold serial dilutions of recombinant monoclonal antibodies (starting at 100 μg/mL), or ferret serum samples (starting at 1 in 100 dilution) added at room temperature for 1h. Detection was performed by sequential staining with donkey anti-ferret IgG (Rockland cat. 618-101-012) and goat anti-donkey-HRP (Abcam cat. Ab6988) at 1:2000 and 1:1000 dilutions respectively for 30 min each. OD450 readings were obtained after addition of Sureblue TMB peroxidase substrate (Seracare) and TMB BlueSTOP Solution (Seracare).

Viral escape asssay

The generation of viral escape mutants was based upon previously described protocols [20]. Briefly, 24-well plates were seeded with 2.5 x 105 Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells per well to form confluent monolayers. The next day, serial dilutions of recombinant ferret mAbs were incubated with A/California/04/2009 virus for one hour at 37°C in Flu-media (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) with 0.8% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 0.1% L-1-Tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin), before adding the virus-antibody mixture to MDCK cells. After 2 to 3 days culture media supernatants from wells with visible cytopathic effect were collected and used to infect a fresh monolayer of MDCK cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of mAb. After serial passaging, culture supernatants were harvested, viral RNA was extracted and the HA gene sequenced. Putative mutant viruses were identified based upon sequence comparison to similarly passaged media-only controls.

Results

Annotation of ferret germline variable, diversity and joining genes

The initial publication of the ferret genome was reported in 2014 [13]. However, the assembly and annotation of immunoglobulin loci is currently incomplete. We therefore identified and annotated genomic contigs containing potential heavy chain variable (IGHV) genes using iterative rounds of BLAST. A total of 27 unique IGHV-like genes were initially identified, including potential pseudogenes and/or non-functional segments. 20 IGHV genes retaining an open reading frame (ORF), downstream recombination signal sequence (RSS; heptamer and nonomer) and critical amino acid residues (eg. Cys 74) were considered potentially functional, although 4 of these lacked identifiable functional leader exons. Based on DNA sequence homology, three groupings of immunoglobulin genes, corresponding to the three vertebrate “clans” [21] could be delineated (Fig 1A): clan I (3 genes), clan II (1 gene) and clan III (16 genes). In line with reports from other Carnivora such as dogs [22] and cats [23], the majority of IGHV gene diversity in ferrets lies within Clan III (human IGHV3-21 or 3–69 homology), with sequence variance concentrated within the CDR-H1 and CDR-H2 regions (Fig 1B). Based upon the conserved arrangement of RSS sequences, we identified 7 putative D gene segments (numbered IGHD1-7) (Fig 1C), of which 3 appear orthologous to canine, murine and/or human variants. Similarly, 5 putative germline J gene segments (IGHJ1-5) were identified (Fig 1D) including 2 conserved orthologues.

Fig 1. Analysis of ferret immunoglobulin heavy chain gene segments.

Fig 1

(A) Non-rooted phylogenetic tree of putative ferret heavy chain variable gene segments. Branch lengths are proportional to genetic distance as indicated. (B) Leader and coding amino acid sequences of putative heavy variable gene (IGHV) segments. For clan III genes, amino acid residues highlighted in red are variable compared to the consensus. (C) Coding and RSS sequences of ferret heavy chain diversity gene (IGHD) segments. (D) Coding and RSS sequences of ferret heavy junction gene (IGHJ) segments.

The 0.7Mb kappa chain locus is contained within a single contig (contig GL896905.1) allowing identification of 48 potentially functional germline IGKV genes (Fig 2A) using similar criteria as IGHV genes, in good agreement to previous computational approaches [24]. Based upon sequence homology with human and mouse genes, these could be divided among three clans; II (44 genes), I (2 genes) and III (2 genes) (Fig 2B).

Fig 2. Annotation of the ferret immunoglobulin light chain gene segments.

Fig 2

(A) Schematic of the kappa locus (contig GL896905.1) detailing the orientation of putative functional IGKV segments relative to the joining and constant genes (B) Non-rooted phylogenetic tree of kappa variable gene segments detailing the three potential clans identified. (C) Non-rooted phylogenetic tree of lambda variable gene segments detailing the four potential clans identified. Contig numbers are indicated in parentheses. Branch lengths are proportional to genetic distance as indicated.

Partial contigs bridging the lambda chain locus were extracted and analysed for lambda variable gene segments (Fig 2C). 32 potentially functional IGLV gene segments were identified, spanning four probable clans; I (2 genes), II (22 genes), IV (2 genes) and V (6 genes). Five potential kappa joining gene segments (IGKJ) and four lambda joining gene segments (IGLJ) were identified based on sequence homology to canine variants. Functionality was inferred based upon the presence of canonical junction F/W-G-X-G motifs, RSS elements and 5’ donor splice sites (GTRAGT) in the adjacent intronic sequences. All putative heavy, kappa and lambda gene segments are provided in S1 Table.

Single cell RT-PCR for recovery of ferret immunoglobulin heavy chain sequences

To investigate the expressed repertoire of germline immunoglobulin gene segments, we used the above sequence information to design multiplex PCR primers (S2 Table) targeting conserved leader and constant regions of recombined heavy, kappa and lambda mRNA transcripts. Using an approach analogous to other mammals [1, 5], single ferret B cells were sorted from cryopreserved splenocyte preparations by flow cytometry using a simple antibody panel and gating scheme (Fig 3A). cDNA was generated from each cell and immunoglobulin sequences recovered by nested multiplex PCR. A total of 121 functional recombined heavy chain sequences (all using a mu constant chain) were recovered from 480 sorted ferret B cells from three genetically outbred ferrets (~25% recovery). In line with the frequency of germline gene segments, the majority of immunoglobulins were derived from III clan genes, with only two sequences recovered from clan II and a single example of a sequence from clan I (Fig 3B).

Fig 3. Genetic features of recovered ferret heavy chain immunoglobulin sequences.

Fig 3

(A) Gating scheme for sorting single ferret Bcells for PCR recovery of recombined immunoglobulin genes. (B) Distribution of variable germline genes recovered from productive, recombined heavy chain immunoglobulin is shown as pie charts. The width of each segment is proportional to the number of recovered sequences. Sequences corresponding to predicted germlines are shown in solid (less than 1% variable), while sequences with poor alignment to predicted germlines are hatched. Novel potential germlines are indicated in red. (C) Distribution of CDR-H3 lengths among recovered immunoglobulin sequences.

An accurate assessment of germline IGHV gene utilisation is difficult due to (a) the current inability to segregate naïve versus B cells that are somatically mutated (memory) during the sort and (b) the limited genomic information surrounding the ferret IGHV locus and (c) a poor understanding of any allotypic variation within these outbred animals. Nevertheless, we recovered clusters of IGHV gene sequences that were highly conserved (>99% homology) to predicted germlines including examples from two of the three clans (II-HV1, III-HV7, III-HV8, III-HV9, III-HV12, III-HV16). A single clan I sequence was recovered, albeit with more limited homology to the putative germline gene (97.6%). The 18–20 IGHV genes we found within genomic contigs is less than observed in felines (24 genes) and canines (38 genes) [24], suggesting additional variable germlines may remain undiscovered. Supporting this, we repeatedly recovered multiple heavy chain immunoglobulin sequences that shared identical IGHV gene sequences, but recombined with different D and J genes, strongly suggestive of a common germline progenitor (III-HV17, III-HV18, III-HV19 and III-HV20, III-HV21). The existence and identity of these additional putative germlines (listed in S1 Table) will be clarified as genomic sequencing of ferrets continues. Utilisation of all five predicted IGHJ gene segments and 6 of 7 IGHD gene segments (not IGHD6) was evident within recombined BCR sequences. CDR-H3 regions, often a critical determinant for antigen recognition, ranged from 5 to 25 amino acids (mean 13.2) in length (Fig 3C); broadly comparable to canines [25] and potentially shorter on average than observed in humans [26].

Recovery of ferret immunoglobulin light chain sequences

For ferret immunoglobulin light chains, 99/480 (20.6%) functional and recombined kappa sequences were recovered, all of which were derived from variable gene segments belonging to clan II and recombined with 4 of 5 predicted IGKJ gene segments (not IGKJ2) (Fig 4A). Germlines II-KV13, II-KV18, II-KV19 II-KV20, II-KV21, II-KV22. II-KV23, II-KV29, II-KV36, II-KV40, II-KV41, II-KV42 and II-KV43 were matched to the sequences (>99% identity) found in silico. Four additional novel germlines were evident within recovered sequences (II-KV45-48) (S1 Table). Given the kappa locus is fully annotated, these additional germlines most likely represent allelic variants of clan II germlines that differ between the outbred ferrets used for genomic sequencing versus B cell sorting.

Fig 4. Genetic features of recovered ferret light chain immunoglobulin sequences.

Fig 4

(A) Distribution of variable germline genes recovered from productive, recombined kappa and lambda light chain immunoglobulins are shown as pie charts. The width of each segment is proportional to the number of recovered sequences. Sequences corresponding to predicted germlines are shown in solid (less than 1% variable), while sequences with poor alignment to predicted germlines are hatched. Novel potential germlines are indicated in red. (B) Distribution of CDR-L3 lengths among recovered immunoglobulin sequences.

For lambda chain immunoglobulins, 144/384 (37.5%) productive and recombined sequences were recovered, most homology to annotated clan II and clan I sequences (II-LVI1, II-LV2, II-LV4, II-LV5, II-LV6, II-LV7, II-LV8, II-LV11, II-LV12, II-LV14, II-LV15, II-LV16, II-LV17, II-LV18, II-LV20, I-LV1; Fig 4A). Additional potential germline genes were also recovered (II-LV22, II-LV23) (S1 Table) as were sequences putatively derived from clan V but with limited homology to the annotated genes.

The lengths of the CDR-L3 ranged from 5 to 11 for the kappa locus and 8–13 for the lambda (Fig 4B), both comparable to that of humans and other mammals. Overall, this initial pilot allowed about 12.5% (60/480) recovery efficiency of functional heavy and light chain pairs from single sorted ferret B cells, with 31/60 pairs utilizing Kappa and 29/60 pairs utilizing Lambda chains. Further improvements in the flow cytometric panel for ferret B-cells and annotation of immunoglobulin genes will enhance the recovery of antibody sequences in the future.

Sequence validation of ferret constant gene segments

Using a next-generation sequencing approach analogous to previous reports [27], we recovered cDNA sequences of ferret constant regions and investigated potential immunoglobulin subclasses. RNA was extracted from ferret splenocytes and subject to RNA-Seq. Putative mRNA transcripts were assembled de novo and 5 heavy chain isotypes (IgM, IgG, IgE, IgD and IgA) and two light chain (IgK and IgL) constant genes identified (sequences in S1 Table). Overall homology to both human and canine sequences was high, with the exception of IgD where the CH1 and hinge domain shows high sequence divergence, consistent with past reports [28]. Minimal variation was observed to artificially spliced genomic sequences, with the exception of some single amino-acid substitutions which could indicate allelic variation within outbred ferrets. Notably, we were unable to identify any IgG subclass variants using this approach, which with four distinct subclasses identified in other carnivores [29], might reflect low transcript abundance within our samples precluding sufficient subclass cDNA recovery.

Recombinant expression of a chimeric human/ferret monoclonal antibody

We next developed the capacity to recombinantly express and purify ferret IgG. Constant genes for ferret IgG, kappa and lambda chains were synthesised and cloned into mammalian expression vectors. Recombined human VDJ (heavy) and VJ (lambda) genes from influenza-specific human antibody CR9114 [19] were joined to ferret constant regions to create chimeric IgG. Transfection of heavy and lambda chain plasmids into a mammalian expression system enabled the purification of chimeric ferret/human IgG using standard protein-A purification (Fig 5A), with the resultant antibody retaining HA-specificity (Fig 5B).

Fig 5. Recombinant expression of chimeric human/ferret monoclonal antibody (mAb) expressing the CR9114 variable domain.

Fig 5

(A) Reducing SDS-PAGE gel of chimeric CR9114 mAb. Heavy (50kDa) and light chains (25kDa) are indicated. (B) Binding of chimeric CR9114 antibody to full length recombinant A/California/09/2009 HA protein. Ferret-Human CR9114 mAb was serially diluted in PBS to detect A/California/04/2009 HA binding. 1x PBS was included as a negative control (no ab control).

Recovery of hemagglutinin-specific monoclonal antibodies from an influenza-infected ferret

We next sought to recover monoclonal antibodies from influenza immune ferrets. From a single ferret infected with H1N1 A/California/04/2009, we obtained cells from parapharyngeal lymph nodes 28 days post-infection, stained with a panel of ferret B cell surface markers and sorted single cells that bound to recombinant HA probes [15] labelled in two alternate fluorophores (PE and APC) (Fig 6A). Due to an inability to identify ferret IgG subclasses, we designed additional primers (S2 Table) targeting IGHJ-gene segments for multiplex PCR amplification of ferret immunoglobulin genes. From 960 sorted HA specific B-cells, we recovered 263 productive, recombined heavy chain immunoglobulin sequences including significant clonal expansions (Fig 6B). Representative examples from various antibody lineages were cloned into ferret expression vectors, expressed in mammalian cell culture and screened by ELISA. Two antibodies (3B03 and 4A06), derived from a common lineage, were found to both bind to full length A/California/04/2009 HA by ELISA (Fig 6C). Both antibodies (sequences in Fig 6D) mediated potent hemagglutinin inhibition activity against A/California/04/2009 (data not shown) and similarly when tested using an in vitro neutralization assay, both 3B03 and 4A06 were able to prevent A/California/04/2009 infection of MDCK cells down to an effective concentration of 0.4mg/ml and 0.08mg/ml respectively. In order to better understand the epitope on HA recognised by 3B03 and 4A06, we generated escape viruses by serial passaging of A/California/04/2009 in the presence of ferret mAbs followed by sequencing of the full-length HA gene using standard techniques [20]. Neutralisation resistant virus displayed a single K163E mutation (Fig 7) localised within the canonical Sa epitope [30] and previously associated in human populations with escape from pandemic H1N1 serum neutralising activity [31, 32].

Fig 6. Recovery and expression of ferret immunoglobulins from HA-specific B cells.

Fig 6

(A) Gating scheme for flow cytometric sorting of single B cells from lymph node suspensions from ferrets infected with A/California/04/2009. Cells binding recombinant HA probes (red) were sorted into 96-well plates for multiplex PCR amplification of heavy and light chain immunoglobulin sequences. (B) Clonal distribution of recovered productive, recombined heavy chain immunoglobulins is shown as a pie chart, with each segment representing a distinct clonal family, the width of each segment proportional to the number of recovered sequences and the total number of sequences recovered is indicated. (C) Binding of fully-ferret monoclonal antibodies to A/California/09/2009 HA protein was measured by ELISA. Ferret monoclonal antibodies 4A06 and 3B03 or serum samples from immunologically naïve ferrets (naïve serum) or ferrets infected with 1000 TCID50 A/California/04/2009 (immune serum) (28 d.p.i) were serially diluted in PBS to detect A/California/04/2009 HA binding. 1x PBS was included as a negative control (no ab control). (D) Recombined heavy (VDJ) and lambda (VJ) chain immunoglobulin sequences from recovered HA-specific ferret mAbs. Inferred somatic mutations from germline indicated in red.

Fig 7. K163E escape mutation elicited by ferret mAb 4A06 mapped onto A/California/04/20009 (PDB:3LZG).

Fig 7

Discussion

We sought to improve the utility of ferrets as an immunological model by deriving techniques for the analysis of B cell immunity. Annotation of genomic immunoglobulin gene segments enabled the design of a multiplex PCR approach to recover ferret BCR sequences. A broad cross-section of predicted germline segments from both heavy and light chain loci were amplified, including several potentially novel germline genes currently absent from available genomic contigs. We noted highly biased V gene utilisation for both heavy and light chain naïve repertoires, with a majority of recovered sequences derived from the most numerous V gene clans (which we termed HV-III, KV-II and LV-II respectively). This observation mirrors the gene distribution in other carnivores, where majority of recovered heavy chain sequences are similarly biased [22, 23, 33, 34]. Light chain bias has been reported for mice (kappa) [35] and both dogs and cats (lambda) [36]. However, humans display more balanced usage of both the kappa and lambda chains [34, 37], as did ferrets in the current study. The distribution of ferret CDR-H3 (mode 13–14 AA) and lambda and kappa CDR-L3 lengths (mode 11 AA and 8–9 AA respectively) were broadly similar to reports from cats [23], dogs [33] and humans [38].

Using the new information on ferret Ig sequences, we were able to generate a chimeric ferret/human mAb that retained specificity for influenza HA, and also two novel fully ferret mAbs that exhibited potent binding and neutralisation against A/California/04/2009. These reagents and similar mAbs could be used in repeated immunotherapy studies in ferrets with less concern about the generation of ferret-anti-human responses to human mAbs. We note that while we were successful in the recombinant expression of chimeric human/ferret or fully ferret lambda chain utilising antibodies, further work is needed to generate analogous kappa chain utilising mAbs.

The utility of BCR repertoire analysis to study antigen specific B-cell responses in ferrets will increase as key knowledge gaps are bridged. Firstly, novel ferret-specific flow cytometry reagents are required to enable the resolution of different ferret B-cell populations, in particular, validated pan-B cell lineage surface markers (such as CD19 or CD20) and markers such CD27 and IgD to accurately distinguish memory versus naïve B cell populations. Further development of reagents to identify ferret memory B cells will enhance the resolution of antigen-specific B cell staining and improve recovery of HA-specific ferret mAbs.

Secondly, increased genomic information, particularly, the confirmation of ferret immunoglobulin germline genes and allelic variation among outbred ferrets will allow the development of comprehensive gene databases such as those maintained by International ImMunogeneTics (IMGT) [14]. While we employed a multiplex PCR approach to amplify immunoglobulin genes, the use of template switching based methods such as 5’RACE has been applied to other species such as dogs [39] and may reduce the potential for primer bias driving preferentially recovery of specific immunoglobulin gene segzments. Alternatively, next generation high throughput approaches and tools for the analysis of large RNA-seq data sets such as VDJPuzzle [40], BraCer [41], BALDR [42] and BASIC [43] have been deployed for analysis of antibody repertoires from cats [44] and rhesus macaques [45]. While the entire ferret kappa loci is assembled in the current copy of the ferret genome, the lambda and heavy chain loci were distributed across a number of contigs and the gene arrangement of these two loci remains unclear. Recent advances in long-read NGS approaches such as Oxford Nanopore [46] technologies could enable high resolution mapping of these loci in ferrets, as recently demonstrated by the assembly of reference gene loci in rhesus macaques [45] which facilitates the in depth analysis of antigen-specific immunoglobulin gene repertoires and the characterisation of antigenic epitopes [47]. Additional germline inference methods such as IgDiscover [48] and TIgER [49] could also be deployed in ferrets to more accurately assess and categorise allelic variation within these outbred animals.

Further work clarifying the range of ferret IgG subtypes and the engagement with cellular Fc-receptors (FcR) is required. While we failed to identify IgG subclasses in the current study, the presence of three or four different isotypes in closely related species such as minks [50], cats [51] and dogs [29] suggests these may still exist in ferrets. Recent studies have proposed a critical role for antibody effector functions for protection against viral pathogens such as influenza [52, 53]. As such, further characterisation of ferret IgG, FcR and capacity to mediate ADCC and other Fc-dependent antibody responses is needed.

The HA reactivity of immune ferret sera is a critically important issue since it guides the selection of human influenza strains for inclusion in seasonal influenza vaccines each year [54]. We identified two ferret mAbs, derived from a single clonally expanded family, which displayed anti-HA reactivity and mediated virus neutralisation in vitro. Interestingly, a single mutation (K163E) was able to mediate complete escape from neutralising activity, and similar mutations have been described in both circulating viruses in human populations [55] and from viral escape mutants selected under pressure from human serum [31, 32] or mAbs [56]. Futher cataloguing differential recognition of HA at the mAb level would complement serological studies, since serum samples from humans, guinea pigs, mice and ferrets have been shown to exhibit differential immunodominance hierarchies within polyclonal responses targeting the canonical epitopes of HA [57] and drive different patterns of viral escape [58]. The tools reported in the current study may also be informative for other emerging human respiratory viruses, most notably the current SARS-CoV2 pandemic. Ferrets can be productively infected with SARS-CoV2 [59, 60] and will serve as a critical model for testing therapeutic options and vaccines against the virus. The capacity to characterise immune repertoires and recover ferret mAbs from SARS-CoV2 infected or immunised ferrets might further support global efforts to develop effective countermeasures against COVID-19.

In summary, we report a methodology to sequence antigen specific B-cells in ferrets, allowing expression of chimeric ferret/human IgG monoclonal antibodies. Further in-depth studies of ferret B-cell repertoires will significantly advance the utility of ferrets as immunological models for critical human diseases such as influenza and SARS-CoV2.

Supporting information

S1 Table

(XLSX)

S2 Table

(XLSX)

S1 Raw images. Uncropped gel image.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The Melbourne WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza is supported by the Australian Government Department of Health. JW is supported by a Melbourne International Research Scholarship and Melbourne International Fee Remission Scholarship.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The Melbourne WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza is supported by the Australian Government Department of Health. This work was supported by NHMRC programme grant #1052979 (SJK) and NHMRC project grant #1129099 (AKW). JW is supported by a Melbourne International Research Scholarship and Melbourne International Fee Remission Scholarship.

References

  • 1.Tiller T, Meffre E, Yurasov S, Tsuiji M, Nussenzweig MC, Wardemann H. Efficient generation of monoclonal antibodies from single human B cells by single cell RT-PCR and expression vector cloning. Journal of Immunological Methods. 2008;329(1–2):112–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tiller T, Tsuiji M, Yurasov S, Velinzon K, Nussenzweig MC, Wardemann H. Autoreactivity in human IgG+ memory B cells. Immunity. 2007;26(2):205–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wardemann H, Busse CE. Expression Cloning of Antibodies from Single Human B Cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1956:105–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liao HX, Levesque MC, Nagel A, Dixon A, Zhang R, Walter E, et al. High-throughput isolation of immunoglobulin genes from single human B cells and expression as monoclonal antibodies. J Virol Methods. 2009;158(1–2):171–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tiller T, Busse CE, Wardemann H. Cloning and expression of murine Ig genes from single B cells. J Immunol Methods. 2009;350(1–2):183–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Starkie DO, Compson JE, Rapecki S, Lightwood DJ. Generation of Recombinant Monoclonal Antibodies from Immunised Mice and Rabbits via Flow Cytometry and Sorting of Antigen-Specific IgG+ Memory B Cells. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sundling C, Zhang Z, Phad GE, Sheng Z, Wang Y, Mascola JR, et al. Single-cell and deep sequencing of IgG-switched macaque B cells reveal a diverse Ig repertoire following immunization. J Immunol. 2014;192(8):3637–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mason RD, Welles HC, Adams C, Chakrabarti BK, Gorman J, Zhou T, et al. Targeted Isolation of Antibodies Directed against Major Sites of SIV Env Vulnerability. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(4):e1005537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chaudhary N, Wesemann DR. Analyzing Immunoglobulin Repertoires. Front Immunol. 2018;9:462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Boyd SD, Crowe JE Jr. Deep sequencing and human antibody repertoire analysis. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016;40:103–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Enkirch T, von Messling V. Ferret models of viral pathogenesis. Virology. 2015;479–480:259–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wong J, Layton D, Wheatley AK, Kent SJ. Improving immunological insights into the ferret model of human viral infectious disease. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses. 2019;13(6):535–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Peng X, Alfoldi J, Gori K, Eisfeld AJ, Tyler SR, Tisoncik-Go J, et al. The draft genome sequence of the ferret (Mustela putorius furo) facilitates study of human respiratory disease. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(12):1250–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lefranc MP, Giudicelli V, Duroux P, Jabado-Michaloud J, Folch G, Aouinti S, et al. IMGT(R), the international ImMunoGeneTics information system(R) 25 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D413–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Whittle JR, Wheatley AK, Wu L, Lingwood D, Kanekiyo M, Ma SS, et al. Flow cytometry reveals that H5N1 vaccination elicits cross-reactive stem-directed antibodies from multiple Ig heavy-chain lineages. J Virol. 2014;88(8):4047–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, van den Beek M, Bouvier D, Čech M, et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Research. 2018;46(W1):W537–W44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boratyn GM, Thierry-Mieg J, Thierry-Mieg D, Busby B, Madden TL. Magic-BLAST, an accurate RNA-seq aligner for long and short reads. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019;20(1):405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dreyfus C, Laursen NS, Kwaks T, Zuijdgeest D, Khayat R, Ekiert DC, et al. Highly conserved protective epitopes on influenza B viruses. Science. 2012;337(6100):1343–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leon PE, Wohlbold TJ, He W, Bailey MJ, Henry CJ, Wilson PC, et al. Generation of Escape Variants of Neutralizing Influenza Virus Monoclonal Antibodies. J Vis Exp. 2017(126). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kirkham PM, Mortari F, Newton JA, Schroeder HW Jr. Immunoglobulin VH clan and family identity predicts variable domain structure and may influence antigen binding. EMBO J. 1992;11(2):603–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bao Y, Guo Y, Xiao S, Zhao Z. Molecular characterization of the VH repertoire in Canis familiaris. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2010;137(1–2):64–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Steiniger SC, Glanville J, Harris DW, Wilson TL, Ippolito GC, Dunham SA. Comparative analysis of the feline immunoglobulin repertoire. Biologicals. 2017;46:81–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Olivieri DN, von Haeften B, Sánchez-Espinel C, Gambón-Deza F. The immunologic V-gene repertoire in mammals. bioRxiv. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wu TT, Johnson G, Kabat EA. Length distribution of CDRH3 in antibodies. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics. 1993;16(1):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shi B, Ma L, He X, Wang X, Wang P, Zhou L, et al. Comparative analysis of human and mouse immunoglobulin variable heavy regions from IMGT/LIGM-DB with IMGT/HighV-QUEST. Theor Biol Med Model. 2014;11:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Leon AJ, Banner D, Xu L, Ran L, Peng Z, Yi K, et al. Sequencing, Annotation, and Characterization of the Influenza Ferret Infectome. Journal of Virology. 2012;87(4):1957–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rogers KA, Richardson JP, Scinicariello F, Attanasio R. Molecular characterization of immunoglobulin D in mammals: immunoglobulin heavy constant delta genes in dogs, chimpanzees and four old world monkey species. Immunology. 2006;118(1):88–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bergeron LM, McCandless EE, Dunham S, Dunkle B, Zhu Y, Shelly J, et al. Comparative functional characterization of canine IgG subclasses. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2014;157(1–2):31–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Caton AJ, Brownlee GG, Yewdell JW, Gerhard W. The antigenic structure of the influenza virus A/PR/8/34 hemagglutinin (H1 subtype). Cell. 1982;31(2 Pt 1):417–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Davis AKF, McCormick K, Gumina ME, Petrie JG, Martin ET, Xue KS, et al. Sera from Individuals with Narrowly Focused Influenza Virus Antibodies Rapidly Select Viral Escape Mutations In Ovo. J Virol. 2018;92(19). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li C, Hatta M, Burke DF, Ping J, Zhang Y, Ozawa M, et al. Selection of antigenically advanced variants of seasonal influenza viruses. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(6):16058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Steiniger SCJ, Dunkle WE, Bammert GF, Wilson TL, Krishnan A, Dunham SA, et al. Fundamental characteristics of the expressed immunoglobulin VH and VL repertoire in different canine breeds in comparison with those of humans and mice. Molecular Immunology. 2014;59(1):71–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Andris JS, Abraham SR, Pascual V, Pistillo MP, Mantero S, Ferrara GB, et al. The human antibody repertoire: heavy and light chain variable region gene usage in six alloantibodies specific for human HLA class I and class II alloantigens. Mol Immunol. 1995;32(14–15):1105–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Larijani M, Chen S, Cunningham LA, Volpe JM, Cowell LG, Lewis SM, et al. The recombination difference between mouse kappa and lambda segments is mediated by a pair-wise regulation mechanism. Mol Immunol. 2006;43(7):870–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Arun SS, Breuer W, Hermanns W. Immunohistochemical examination of light-chain expression (lambda/kappa ratio) in canine, feline, equine, bovine and porcine plasma cells. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1996;43(9):573–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mole CM, Bene MC, Montagne PM, Seilles E, Faure GC. Light chains of immunoglobulins in human secretions. Clin Chim Acta. 1994;224(2):191–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kügler J, Wilke S, Meier D, Tomszak F, Frenzel A, Schirrmann T, et al. Generation and analysis of the improved human HAL9/10 antibody phage display libraries. BMC Biotechnology. 2015;15(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bao Y, Guo Y, Xiao S, Zhao Z. Molecular characterization of the VH repertoire in Canis familiaris. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2010;137(1–2):64–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rizzetto S, Koppstein DNP, Samir J, Singh M, Reed JH, Cai CH, et al. B-cell receptor reconstruction from single-cell RNA-seq with VDJPuzzle. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(16):2846–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lindeman I, Emerton G, Mamanova L, Snir O, Polanski K, Qiao SW, et al. BraCeR: B-cell-receptor reconstruction and clonality inference from single-cell RNA-seq. Nat Methods. 2018;15(8):563–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Upadhyay AA, Kauffman RC, Wolabaugh AN, Cho A, Patel NB, Reiss SM, et al. BALDR: a computational pipeline for paired heavy and light chain immunoglobulin reconstruction in single-cell RNA-seq data. Genome Med. 2018;10(1):20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Canzar S, Neu KE, Tang Q, Wilson PC, Khan AA. BASIC: BCR assembly from single cells. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(3):425–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Steiniger SCJ, Glanville J, Harris DW, Wilson TL, Ippolito GC, Dunham SA. Comparative analysis of the feline immunoglobulin repertoire. Biologicals. 2017;46:81–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ramesh A, Darko S, Hua A, Overman G, Ransier A, Francica JR, et al. Structure and Diversity of the Rhesus Macaque Immunoglobulin Loci through Multiple De Novo Genome Assemblies. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017;8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jain M, Koren S, Miga KH, Quick J, Rand AC, Sasani TA, et al. Nanopore sequencing and assembly of a human genome with ultra-long reads. Nature Biotechnology. 2018;36(4):338–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cirelli KM, Carnathan DG, Nogal B, Martin JT, Rodriguez OL, Upadhyay AA, et al. Slow Delivery Immunization Enhances HIV Neutralizing Antibody and Germinal Center Responses via Modulation of Immunodominance. Cell. 2019;177(5):1153-71.e28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Corcoran MM, Phad GE, Bernat NV, Stahl-Hennig C, Sumida N, Persson MAA, et al. Production of individualized V gene databases reveals high levels of immunoglobulin genetic diversity. Nature Communications. 2016;7(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Buhler J, Ralph DK, Matsen FA. Per-sample immunoglobulin germline inference from B cell receptor deep sequencing data. PLOS Computational Biology. 2019;15(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tabel H, Ingram DG. Immunoglobulins of mink. Evidence for five immunoglobulin classes of 7S type. Immunology. 1972;22(6):933–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schultz RD, Scott FW, Duncan JR, Gillespie JH. Feline immunoglobulins. Infect Immun. 1974;9(2):391–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jegaskanda S, Weinfurter JT, Friedrich TC, Kent SJ. Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity Is Associated with Control of Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Virus Infection of Macaques. Journal of Virology. 2013;87(10):5512–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jegaskanda S, Reading PC, Kent SJ. Influenza-specific antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity: toward a universal influenza vaccine. J Immunol. 2014;193(2):469–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Monto AS, Petrie JG. Improving Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness: Ways to Begin Solving the Problem. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yasuhara A, Yamayoshi S, Soni P, Takenaga T, Kawakami C, Takashita E, et al. Diversity of antigenic mutants of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus escaped from human monoclonal antibodies. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Huang KY, Rijal P, Schimanski L, Powell TJ, Lin TY, McCauley JW, et al. Focused antibody response to influenza linked to antigenic drift. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(7):2631–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liu STH, Behzadi MA, Sun W, Freyn AW, Liu WC, Broecker F, et al. Antigenic sites in influenza H1 hemagglutinin display species-specific immunodominance. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(11):4992–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lee JM, Eguia R, Zost SJ, Choudhary S, Wilson PC, Bedford T, et al. Mapping person-to-person variation in viral mutations that escape polyclonal serum targeting influenza hemagglutinin. Elife. 2019;8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kim YI, Kim SG, Kim SM, Kim EH, Park SJ, Yu KM, et al. Infection and Rapid Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Ferrets. Cell Host Microbe. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shi J, Wen Z, Zhong G, Yang H, Wang C, Huang B, et al. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS-coronavirus 2. Science. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Stephen Mark Tompkins

6 Apr 2020

PONE-D-20-05643

Sequencing B cell receptors from ferrets (Mustela putorius furo)

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr Wheatley,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please consider the points raised by reviewers one and two. While minor, they are important to address. Please provide details on the frequencies of immunoglobulin chains and discuss the coverage as noted by reviewer one. Similarly Reviewer two asks for additional information on the sequences as a figure or table. Also, the constant gene segments are missing from Sup Table 1. And the recommended discussion of other approaches is important to include. A brief discussion on applications to the current pandemic would be interesting to consider. Perhaps utilize this opportunity to better justify figure 5 as reviewer one notes it is somewhat tangential. Finally, while reviewer one recommends publication, please keep in mind that the reviewers do not make decisions on acceptance of manuscripts.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by May 21 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Stephen Mark Tompkins

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, please provide methods of sacrifice in the Methods section of your manuscript.

3. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript “Sequencing B cell receptors from ferrets (Mustela putorius furo)” describes the development of a multiplex PCR approach to single cell-sequence ferret IgG antibodies. This study builds the framework for more in-depth immunological studies in an extremely important animal model for respiratory infectious diseases. The manuscript is scientifically soloid, well planned, written and relatively easy to follow by anyone in the field. The authors efforts to assemble the ferret immunoglobulin germline repertoire has been long needed, particularly in the Influenza research world, and will certainly pioneer similar studies in other respiratory infectious diseases.

Overall this manuscript is of extreme value for the scientific community and I strongly recommend its publication in PLOSone. Nonetheless I do have some small concerns:

1. The authors report the recovery of IgGH, IgGV� and IgGV� as 121/480, 99/480 and 144/384. Furthermore, it is then stated that 60/480 heavy/light chain pairs were recovered, but it would be important to know if these are equally distributed between � and � light chains. Plate based single cell sorting for BCR amplification is known to be considerably inefficient mostly due to low RNA input or inefficient diversity coverage during amplification. The ratio of successful heavy and light chain pairs to the number of individual heavy or light chain sequences recovered might be a good indicator good diversity coverage.

2. In figure 5 the authors report the expression and purification of a Ferret/human chimeric antibody. In spite of the technological ingenuity of such experiment, it would be much more interesting to actually express and purify a full ferret monoclonal antibody. If using influenza infected animals, it would be easy to prove the specificity of this antibody by ELISA. Standing alone this experiment adds very little to the manuscript and actually distracts the reader from its main message.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript describes the development of multiplex PCR for obtaining ferret Ig genes and generating recombinant monoclonal antibodies. This is an extremely important development to gain a better understanding of immune responses in ferrets, which have been a valuable model for the study of human respiratory infections. The manuscript is clearly written with well-designed experiments.

Some minor comments are:

Using bulk RNA-Seq to obtain constant region genes with multiple sub-classes can be problematic. It is mentioned that the sequences from RNA-Seq showed minimal variation compared to the genomic sequences. It will be helpful if this information is made available in some Figure or Table.

Sequences of Constant gene segments are not provided in the Supplementary Table 1

Line 117 – Should it be supplementary table 2 instead of 1?

The sequence data should be deposited in Genbank

This is a very good start but significant more work is required to obtain a complete repertoire of germline Ig genes. Some discussion on how previous studies using template-switching methods such as BASIC, BALDR, BraCeR and VDJPuzle2 may be implemented for ferrets will be useful. In addition, long read sequencing has helped significantly improve our understanding of Ig loci in rhesus macaques (Ramesh et al, Front. Immunol. 2017 and Cirelli et al, Cell 2019). Discussion on using long-read sequencing and germline inference methods such as IgDiscover, partis and Tigger will also be helpful with respect to future directions in this field. Lastly, this work is extremely relevant with respect to the current pandemic. Discussing how ferrets maybe useful for studying viral infections such as COVID-19 will highlight the importance of this work.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Rodrigo Abreu

Reviewer #2: Yes: Steven Bosinger & Amity Upadhyay

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233794.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Apr 2020

Response to Reviewers

We thank the reviewers for their positive comments and suggestions which have significantly strengthened the manuscript. We address each reviewers’ comments below in point-by-point form.

Reviewer #1: The manuscript “Sequencing B cell receptors from ferrets (Mustela putorius furo)” describes the development of a multiplex PCR approach to single cell-sequence ferret IgG antibodies. This study builds the framework for more in-depth immunological studies in an extremely important animal model for respiratory infectious diseases. The manuscript is scientifically soloid, well planned, written and relatively easy to follow by anyone in the field. The authors efforts to assemble the ferret immunoglobulin germline repertoire has been long needed, particularly in the Influenza research world, and will certainly pioneer similar studies in other respiratory infectious diseases.

Overall this manuscript is of extreme value for the scientific community and I strongly recommend its publication in PLOSone. Nonetheless I do have some small concerns:

1. The authors report the recovery of IgGH, IgGV� and IgGV� as 121/480, 99/480 and 144/384. Furthermore, it is then stated that 60/480 heavy/light chain pairs were recovered, but it would be important to know if these are equally distributed between � and � light chains. Plate based single cell sorting for BCR amplification is known to be considerably inefficient mostly due to low RNA input or inefficient diversity coverage during amplification. The ratio of successful heavy and light chain pairs to the number of individual heavy or light chain sequences recovered might be a good indicator good diversity coverage.

We have updated the manuscript (Lines 296-297) to reflect the relative proportions of kappa versus lambda light chain pairs recovered. This now reads:

“Overall, this initial pilot allowed about 12.5% (60/480) recovery efficiency of functional heavy and light chain pairs from single sorted ferret B cells, with 31/60 pairs utilizing Kappa and 29/60 pairs utilizing Lambda chains.”

2. In figure 5 the authors report the expression and purification of a Ferret/human chimeric antibody. In spite of the technological ingenuity of such experiment, it would be much more interesting to actually express and purify a full ferret monoclonal antibody. If using influenza infected animals, it would be easy to prove the specificity of this antibody by ELISA. Standing alone this experiment adds very little to the manuscript and actually distracts the reader from its main message.

We agree and have undertaken the recovery of a fully-ferret monoclonal antibody and included both ELISA and viral escape data in the revised manuscript. We have updated the Methods with the following:

“For the recovery of antigen-specific ferret B cells, a single ferret was infected with 1000 TCID50 of H1N1 A/California/04/2009 and a single cell suspension of parapharyngeal lymph node cells (pLN) was prepared at 28 days post-infection and cryopreserved in heat-inactivated FCS containing 10% DMSO. Cells were subsequently thawed and stained with Live/Dead Fixable Aqua (Thermo Fisher), surface stains anti-CD11b-BV510 (Biolegend: clone M1/70), anti-ferret IgA/IgM/IgG-FITC (Rockland Immunochemicals cat.618-102-130), anti-CD8 eFluor450 (eBioscience Clone OKT8), anti-ferret CD4 (Layton et al., 2017) conjugated to APC-Cy-7. Biotinylated recombinant full length A/California/04/2009 hemagglutinin (HA) probes (Whittle et al., 2014) conjugated to streptavidin-PE or streptavidin-APC (Invitrogen) were used to sort single HA-specific B cells into 96-well plates and stored at -20oC.”

And:

“Viral Escape Asssay

The generation of viral escape mutants was based upon previously described protocols (Leon et al. 2017). Briefly, 24-well plates were seeded with 2.5 x 105 Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells per well to form confluent monolayers. The next day, serial dilutions of recombinant ferret mAbs were incubated with A/California/04/20090 virus for one hour at 37oC in Flu-media (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) with 0.8% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 0.1% L-1-Tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin), before adding the virus-antibody mixture to MDCK cells. After 2 to 3 days culture media supernatants from wells with visible cytopathic effect were collected and used to infect a fresh monolayer of MDCK cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of mAb. After serial passaging, culture supernatants were harvested, viral RNA was extracted and the HA gene sequenced. Putative mutant viruses were identified based upon sequence comparison to similarly passaged media-only controls.“

We have updated the Results with the following:

“Recovery of hemagglutinin-specific monoclonal antibodies from an influenza-infected ferret

We next sought to recover monoclonal antibodies from influenza immune ferrets. From a single ferret infected with H1N1 A/California/04/2009, we cells from parapharyngeal lymph nodes 28 days post-infection, stained with a panel of ferret B cell surface markers and sorted single cells that bound to recombinant HA probes (Whittle et al., 2014) labelled in two alternate fluorophores (PE and APC) (Figure 6A). Due to an inability to identify ferret IgG subclasses, we designed additional primers (Supplementary table 2) targeting IGHJ-gene segments for multiplex PCR amplification of ferret immunoglobulin genes. From 376 sorted HA specific B-cells, we recovered 263 productive, recombined heavy chain immunoglobulin sequences including significant clonal expansions (Figure 6B). Representative examples from various antibody lineages were cloned into ferret expression vectors, expressed in mammalian cell culture and screened by ELISA. Two antibodies (3B03 and 4A06), derived from a common lineage, were found to both bind to full length A/California/04/2009 HA by ELISA (Figure 6C). Both antibodies (sequences in Figure 6D) mediated potent hemagglutinin inhibition activity against A/California/04/2009 (data not shown) and similarly when tested using an in vitro neutralization assay, both 3B03 and 4A06 were able to prevent A/California/04/2009 infection of MDCK cells down to an effective concentration of 0.4mg/ml and 0.08mg/ml respectively. In order to better understand the epitope on HA recognised by 3B03 and 4A06, we generated escape viruses by serial passaging of A/California/04/2009 in the presence of ferret mAbs followed by sequencing of the full-length HA gene using standard techniques (Leon et al 2017). Neutralisation resistant virus displayed a single K163E mutation (Figure 7) localised within the canonical Sa epitope (Caton et al. 1982) and previously associated in human populations with escape from pandemic H1N1 serum neutralising activity (Chengjun et al. 2016; Davis et al. 2018).”

And we have included a new Figures 6 and 7:

And additional text has been incorporated throughout the discussion.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript describes the development of multiplex PCR for obtaining ferret Ig genes and generating recombinant monoclonal antibodies. This is an extremely important development to gain a better understanding of immune responses in ferrets, which have been a valuable model for the study of human respiratory infections. The manuscript is clearly written with well-designed experiments.

Some minor comments are:

Using bulk RNA-Seq to obtain constant region genes with multiple sub-classes can be problematic. It is mentioned that the sequences from RNA-Seq showed minimal variation compared to the genomic sequences. It will be helpful if this information is made available in some Figure or Table.

Sequences of Constant gene segments are not provided in the Supplementary Table 1

Line 117 – Should it be supplementary table 2 instead of 1?

Sequences for the ferret constant gene segments have been included within Supplementary Table 1 (Tab – “constant”)

The sequence data should be deposited in Genbank

Relevant sequence data have been deposited to Genbank (submission ID:2331742)

This is a very good start but significant more work is required to obtain a complete repertoire of germline Ig genes. Some discussion on how previous studies using template-switching methods such as BASIC, BALDR, BraCeR and VDJPuzle2 may be implemented for ferrets will be useful. In addition, long read sequencing has helped significantly improve our understanding of Ig loci in rhesus macaques (Ramesh et al, Front. Immunol. 2017 and Cirelli et al, Cell 2019). Discussion on using long-read sequencing and germline inference methods such as IgDiscover, partis and Tigger will also be helpful with respect to future directions in this field.

We have expanded the discussion to cover these important sequencing technologies. It now includes the following section:

“While we employed a multiplex PCR approach to amplify immunoglobulin genes, the use of template switching based methods such as 5’RACE has been applied to other species such as dogs (39) and may reduce the potential for primer bias driving preferentially recovery of specific immunoglobulin gene segzments. Alternatively, next generation high throughput approaches and tools for the analysis of large RNA-seq data sets such as VDJPuzzle(40), BraCer(41), BALDR(42) and BASIC(43) have been deployed for analysis of antibody repertoires from cats (44) and rhesus macaques (45). While the entire ferret kappa loci is assembled in the current copy of the ferret genome, the lambda and heavy chain loci were distributed across a number of contigs and the gene arrangement of these two loci remains unclear. Recent advances in long-read NGS approaches such as Oxford Nanopore (46) technologies could enable high resolution mapping of these loci in ferrets, as recently demonstrated by the assembly of reference gene loci in rhesus macaques (45) which facilitates the in depth analysis of antigen-specific immunoglobulin gene repertoires and the characterisation of antigenic epitopes (47). Additional germline inference methods such as IgDiscover (48) and TIgER (49) could also be deployed in ferrets to more accurately assess and categorise allelic variation within these outbred animals.”

Lastly, this work is extremely relevant with respect to the current pandemic. Discussing how ferrets maybe useful for studying viral infections such as COVID-19 will highlight the importance of this work.

We have expanded the discussion to cover the importance of ferrets for coronavirus research. It now includes the following section:

“The tools reported in the current study may also be informative for other emerging human respiratory viruses, most notably the current SARS-CoV2 pandemic. Ferrets can be productively infected with SARS-CoV2 (59, 60) and will serve as a critical model for testing therapeutic options and vaccines against the virus. The capacity to characterise immune repertoires and recover ferret mAbs from SARS-CoV2 infected or immunised ferrets might further support global efforts to develop effective countermeasures against COVID-19.”

Attachment

Submitted filename: PLOS_rebuttal_Final.docx

Decision Letter 1

Stephen Mark Tompkins

13 May 2020

Sequencing B cell receptors from ferrets (Mustela putorius furo)

PONE-D-20-05643R1

Dear Dr. Wheatley,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Stephen Mark Tompkins

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Stephen Mark Tompkins

18 May 2020

PONE-D-20-05643R1

Sequencing B cell receptors from ferrets (Mustela putorius furo)

Dear Dr. Wheatley:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Stephen Mark Tompkins

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table

    (XLSX)

    S1 Raw images. Uncropped gel image.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOS_rebuttal_Final.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES