Skip to main content
ESC Heart Failure logoLink to ESC Heart Failure
. 2020 Mar 25;7(3):1109–1117. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12641

Changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity

Yuri Ichikawa 1,2, Tomoko Maeda 3, Tetsuya Takahashi 4, Kohei Ashikaga 5, Shiori Tanaka 6, Yuki Sumi 2, Haruki Itoh 6,
PMCID: PMC7261565  PMID: 32212319

Abstract

Aims

The kinetics of recovery‐period oxygen uptake (VO2) are affected by the O2 deficit generated during exercise. However, studies using ramp tests (RTs) and constant work rate tests (CT) have differently characterized VO2 responses to increased exercise intensity differently. We used these two types of loading patterns to investigate the effects of lowintensity, mediumintensity, and highintensity exercises on the half time (T1/2) of recovery‐period VO2 and the mechanism.

Methods and results

Ten healthy men aged 21.2 ± 0.9 years underwent symptom‐limited cardiopulmonary exercise tests with the ramp protocol to determine their anaerobic threshold. All subjects subsequently underwent three submaximal RT and CT at low, moderate, and high intensities. In all RTs, subjects began exercise by warming up (20 W). In CT, T1/2 was significantly lengthened as exercise intensity increased (CT‐low: 34.0 ± 3.9 s, CT‐moderate: 39.5 ± 3.5 s, CT‐high:44.6 ± 4.2 s; P < 0.01, ANOVA), whereas no significant change was observed in RT, which began with the same work rate (RT‐low: 46.0 ± 5.7 s, RT‐moderate: 45.7 ± 4.8 s, RT‐high: 44.6 ± 3.5 s, RT‐max: 44.8 ± 3.2 s; P = 0.868, ANOVA). Only high‐intensity exercise resulted in two components (the fast and slow components) of VO2 decay, reflecting the increased O2 deficit by anaerobic metabolism.

Conclusions

The exercise intensity at the beginning of an exercise affects early recovery‐period VO2, which is a fast component. The T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 occurs during the fast component, and an increase in O2 deficit affects both the fast and slow components, lengthening the T1/2. The T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 in CT at moderate or high intensities, even if not symptom limited, can be used to evaluate exercise intolerance and early occurrence of anaerobic metabolism. Submaximal exercise tests may be considered as convenient methods for evaluating exercise tolerance in patients with cardiac failure.

Keywords: Oxygen uptake, O2 deficit, Recovery‐period, Half time, Exercise intensity

Introduction

In recent years, it has been acknowledged that the kinetics of post‐exercise recovery‐period oxygen uptake (VO2) can be used to evaluate the severity of cardiac failure.1 The kinetics of recovery‐period VO2 consist of two components: the fast component, which attenuates rapidly after the cessation of exercise, and the slow component, which attenuates gradually thereafter.2 The time constant determined by exponentially regressing VO2 is one index that can be used to evaluate recovery‐period VO2 kinetics.3, 4 The half time (T1/2) of VO2 has also garnered attention as an index of recovery‐period VO2 kinetics,1 and the meaning of these two indices is deemed to be essentially equivalent. It is thought that the kinetics of recovery‐period VO2 reflect the O2 deficit generated during exercise,5, 6, 7 but the changes observed in these indices as the exercise intensity increases differ; reports using constant work rate tests (CT) do not match with those using ramp tests (RTs). Shimizu et al.8 reported that in CT, the time constant lengthens as the exercise intensity increases. However, Cohen‐Solal et al.1 report that in RT, the exercise intensity at the end of the exercise period does not significantly affect T1/2. There is no existing research comparing how increases in work rate via these two loading patterns (i.e. CT vs. RT) affect recovery‐period VO2 kinetics.

Thus, in this study, we have used two types of loading patterns—CT and RT—to investigate the effect of low‐intensity, medium‐intensity, and high‐intensity exercises, as indicated by intensity at the end of exercise, on the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 and to determine the mechanism by which these effects are brought about.

Methods

Subjects

The research subjects consisted of healthy men with no history of smoking or cardiovascular disease. Twelve‐lead electrocardiograms revealed no cardiac abnormalities in these subjects (Table 1).

Table 1.

Gas analysis data, heart rate, and work rate at rest and at end of each exercise

Ramp test
Rest Low intensity Moderate intensity High intensity Maximal intensity
VO2 (mL/min) 293.1 ± 36.4 1062.2 ± 167.5 1373.1 ± 231.7 1766.4 ± 333.0 2383.1 ± 465.3
VCO2 (mL/min) 254.2 ± 31.2 891.9 ± 135.0 1243.2 ± 178.4 1788.4 ± 302.9 2860.3 ± 501.5
RER 0.87 ± 0.01 0.84 ± 0.06 0.9 ± 0.04 1.02 ± 0.08 1.21 ± 0.08
VE (L/min) 8.5 ± 1.2 21.9 ± 3.0 28.4 ± 4.7 38.0 ± 5.9 64.0 ± 10.5
HR (b.p.m.) 74.8 ± 8.3 105.0 ± 10.5 119.8 ± 11.5 132.7 ± 13.5 164.6 ± 13.1
Work rate (W) 68.7 ± 25.4 99.5 ± 22.9 136.5 ± 20.1 199.4 ± 27.6
Submaximal constant work test
Rest Low intensity Moderate intensity High intensity
VO2 (mL/min) 303.9 ± 47.4 980.2 ± 165.1 1330 ± 188.4 1746.7 ± 302.4
VCO2 (mL/min) 258.4 ± 41.9 913.6 ± 149.8 1316.4 ± 189.0 1823.9 ± 289.8
RER 0.85 ± 0.02 0.96 ± 0.05 0.99 ± 0.10 1.05 ± 0.10
VE (L/min) 8.5 ± 1.7 23.4 ± 3.2 31.2 ± 4.2 42.6 ± 6.4
HR (b.p.m) 76.4 ± 8.8 103.7 ± 11.9 121.8 ± 12.9 140.1 ± 17.9
Work rate (W) 47.7 ± 13.3 73.9 ± 14.0 106.3 ± 20.0

Rest values are the average of all the tests at rest with different protocols for each loading pattern. HR, heart rate; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; VCO2, carbon dioxide output; VE, minute ventilation; VO2, oxygen uptake.

Cardiopulmonary exercise test

Expired gas was analysed using a Cpex‐1 (Inter Reha Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and VO2 (mL/min) were measured on a breath by breath basis.

All exercise tests were performed using an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer (IP‐ES50P, Ergoline Co. Ltd., Bitz, Germany). During the test, a 12‐lead electrocardiogram was monitored (1200 W, NORAV Medical Co. Ltd., Yoqneam, Israel), and blood pressure was measured every minute using an automatic sphygmomanometer (Tango M2, Suntech Co. Ltd., NC, USA). The expired gas data were converted from breath by breath values to 3 s values and expressed using an 8‐point moving average.

The T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 was defined as the time taken (s) to reach 50% of the difference between exercise‐final VO2 and rest VO2.9

Symptom‐limited maximal ramp test

First, all subjects underwent a symptom‐limited maximal RT (RT‐max) (Figure 1 A). After 6 min of rest on the ergometer, subjects started 20 Watt warming‐up for 4 min followed by 30 W/min ramping until their exhaustion. The pedalling speed was set to 60 rpm. After the exercise, the subjects sat on the ergometer without pedalling for 10 min. The anaerobic threshold (AT; VO2, mL/min) was determined by following criteria1: an increase in respiratory exchange ratio as exercise intensity increased,2 nonlinear increase in VCO2 vs. VO2,3 an increase in VE/VO2 without a corresponding increase in VE/VCO2,4 and an increase in end‐tidal O2 fraction (FETO2) without a corresponding increase in end‐tidal CO2 fraction (FETCO2).10

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Determining work rates for submaximal ramp tests and submaximal constant work rate tests. VO2, oxygen uptake; AT, anaerobic threshold; W‐up, warming up.

Submaximal ramp test

The protocol for the submaximal RT was carried out similarly to the RT‐max, but exercise was terminated when the exercise intensity (VO2) reached 75% (low intensity of RT: RT‐low), 100% (moderate intensity, RT‐moderate), and 125% (high intensity, RT‐high) of the VO2 at each subject's predetermined AT (Figure 1 B 1 D).

Submaximal constant work rate test

After resting for 6 min, the subjects exercised at one of the three constant work rates for 6 min (low intensity, CT‐low; moderate intensity, CT‐moderate; high intensity, CT‐high). After each bout, they were observed at rest for 10 min.

The work rates used in each CT were 30 W less than the final work rates of each corresponding RT. In order to ensure that exercise‐final VO2 was similar in the submaximal RT and CT, we took into account that the time lag between the increase in work rate and increase in VO2 (e–g, Figure 1 ). Subjects performed each test randomly with an adequate interval of time in between each test.

Inflection point of two exponential regression curves

Because the inflection points were clear in all cases, we visually determined the inflection point, which divided the fast and slow components on the graphs of recovery‐period VO2 kinetics and measured the time (s) from the end of the exercise to the inflection point (Figure 2 ).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Inflection point of VO2 decay in recovery phase after exercise. Dotted line a: exponential regression curve of fast component. Dotted line b: exponential regression curve of slow component.

Measurement of O2 deficit at the beginning of exercise and O2 debt after exercise

We measured the O2 deficit at the beginning of exercise and the area under the curve (AUC) during the recovery‐period VO2 (O2 debt) (Figure 3 ).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

O2 deficit at the beginning of exercise and O2 debt after exercise. VO2, oxygen uptake; W‐up, warming up. (a) and (e): O2 deficit at the beginning of exercise. (b): total warming up VO2. (f): total exercise VO2. (d) and (g): O2 debt after exercise. (c): O2 deficit presumed to occur during incremental load in RT. (c) was not actually measured as it is not measurable. Dotted line: theoretically speculated ATP requirement for the exercise.

As shown in Figure 3 A, the O2 deficit at the beginning of the RT (a) was calculated by subtracting the AUC of the VO2 curve over the 4 min warming‐up period (b) from the area of the rectangle whose height was the difference between rest VO2 and VO2 at the end of the 4 min warming‐up period and whose width was 4 min (a + b). We actually measured only A and D because the O2 deficit, which was speculated to be generate during the incremental loading of RT, was not measurable (c).

The O2 deficit during the submaximal CT (e), as shown in Figure 3 B, was calculated by subtracting the AUC of the VO2 curve over the 6 min testing period (f) from the area of the rectangle whose height was the difference between rest VO2 and VO2 at the end of exercise and whose width was 6 min (e + f).

Post‐exercise O2 debts (d and g in Figure 3 A and 3 B, respectively) were calculated by taking the exercise‐final VO2 as the peak of the curve and integrating VO2 from there until it decayed to the rest value. VO2 at measurement was calculated without the use of moving averages. Finally, we calculated the ratio of O2 debt to O2 deficit (O2 debt/O2 deficit) for each exercise intensity. We calculated the percentage of the O2 deficit [e/(e + f)] and that of the O2 debt [g/(e + f)] in O2 consumption during exercise in CT.

Statistical analyses

Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis used paired t‐test and ANOVA where applicable. A P‐value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were carried out using the JMP computer software (Ver. 11.2.0, SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA).

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Tokyo University of Technology Ethics Committee (no. E17HS‐002) and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent was obtained from the subjects after they were thoroughly informed of what study participation entailed.

Results

Thirteen subjects underwent the RT‐max. Of these subjects, three were excluded because of a vagal reflex after exercise. As such, the data from 10 subjects were included in the study and analysed (age: 21.2 ± 0.9 years, height: 170.6 ± 5.9 cm, weight: 58.6 ± 7.0 kg, AT: 1311 ± 234 mL/min, work rate at AT: 104.9 ± 17.2 W, peak VO2: 2383 ± 465 mL/min, work rate at peak: 199.4 ± 27.6 W). Each subject performed a total of seven exercise tests: the RT‐max, three submaximal RT, and three submaximal CT (Figure 1 ). There were no significant differences in exercise‐final VO2 between the submaximal RT and CT at any of the three intensities (VO2: mL/min, RT‐low: 1062 ± 167 vs. CT‐low: 980 ± 165; RT‐moderate: 1373 ± 231 vs. CT‐moderate: 1330 ± 188; RT‐high: 1766 ± 323 vs. CT‐high: 1746 ± 302).

T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2

We found no significant differences in the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 between the four RT intensities (RT‐low: 46.0 ± 5.7 s, RT‐moderate: 45.7 ± 4.8 s, RT‐high: 44.6 ± 3.5 s, and RT‐max: 44.8 ± 3.2 s; P = 0.868) (Figure 4 ). The T1/2 for RT‐high and RT‐max appeared lower than the corresponding values for the RT‐low and RT‐moderate; however, these differences were not statistically significant. On the other hand, in the submaximal CT, the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 significantly lengthened as work rate increased (CT‐low: 34.0 ± 3.9 s, CT‐moderate: 39.5 ± 3.5 s, CT‐high:44.6 ± 4.2 s; P < 0.01).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Half time of VO2 in different exercise intensity of ramp tests and constant work rate tests. Half time: T1/2. (A) In the ramp test, there was no significant difference in T1/2 between the exercise intensities. (B) In the constant work rate test, as the work rate increased, the T1/2 was extended. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01. N.S., not significant.

T1/2 and the inflection point

In each test, as the T1/2 occurred before the inflection point, we considered it to be located in the fast component (time to fast component, s: RT‐high: 84.0 ± 3.0, RT‐max: 100.6 ± 11.9, CT‐high: 82.5 ± 10.2). In the low and moderate intensities of the RT and the submaximal CT, no inflection point occurred; as such, we judged there to be no slow component in these cases.

O2 deficit and O2 debt

In the RT, there was no significant difference in O2 deficit as the final‐exercise work rate increased, while O2 debt increased along with final‐exercise work rate. In the CT, both of O2 deficit and O2 debt increased along with work rate (Table 2).

Table 2.

O2 deficit during exercise and O2 debt after exercise

Ramp test
Low Moderate High Maximal P‐value
O2 deficit (L) 0.67 ± 0.07 0.66 ± 0.05 0.65 ± 0.09 0.69 ± 0.10 0.743
O2 debt (L) 1.72 ± 0.03 2.49 ± 0.41 3.37 ± 0.49 7.06 ± 1.55 <0.001
O2 debt/O2 deficit 2.75 ± 0.47 3.78 ± 0.43 5.19 ± 0.92 10.18 ± 1.80 <0.001
Constant work rate test
Low Moderate High P‐value
O2 deficit (L) 1.38 ± 0.28 2.00 ± 0.41 3.64 ± 0.71 <0.001
O2 debt (L) 1.33 ± 0.28 1.98 ± 0.39 3.35 ± 0.64 <0.001
O2 debt/O2 deficit 0.96 ± 0.03 0.99 ± 0.02 0.92 ± 0.05 0.002
O2 deficit/total O2 consumption (%) 10.9 ± 1.4 10.7 ± 1.4 14.0 ± 2.0 <0.001
O2 debt/total O2 consumption (%) 10.5 ± 1.2 10.6 ± 1.3 12.9 ± 2.1 0.006

P‐values were calculated by ANOVA. Total O2 consumption is the sum of the VO2 and O2 deficit during exercise in CT cases.

Discussion

T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 in different loading patterns

First, in the RT, even when exercise‐final work rates increased, no significant changes were noted in T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2. This observation largely corresponds with finding reported by Cohen‐Solal et al.1 who were using exercise intensities above the AT.

Next, in the submaximal CT, the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 significantly lengthened as the work rate increased. We believe that this result corresponds with that of Shimizu et al.8 who reported the increase in the recovery‐period time constant.

Consequently, as the work rate increased, we observed differences in the change in the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 between the two different loading patterns (RT vs. CT).

Differences in work rate at the beginning of exercise

We speculated that differences in the change in the T1/2 along with the work rate between the two loading patterns were caused by differences in the work rate at the beginning of exercise. In the RT, the subjects always began exercising at the same work rate. In the CT, the higher the initial exercise work rate, the longer the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 became. Gore and Withers11 reported that O2 deficit was affected by both exercise intensity and duration, of which intensity was the major determinant of excess post‐exercise oxygen consumption.

Fast and slow components of VO2 after exercise

At the beginning of exercise, the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) stored inside the skeletal muscles, and the ATP regenerated by creatine phosphate (PCr) are used as energy for the exercise (alactic), after that aerobic metabolism ensues and ATP needed was satisfied. The O2 deficit generated here is reflected in the fast component at post‐exercise. However, if the exercise intensity at the beginning of exercise is above one's AT, the energy stored in the muscles as ATP and PCr is metabolized first, and ATP deficiencies that cannot be covered by aerobic metabolism are compensated by anaerobic metabolism (lactic). The sum of these three metabolic systems increases O2 deficit and prolongs the decay of post‐exercise VO2 (i.e. slow component).7

In other words, at exercise intensities below AT, the O2 deficit caused by energetic metabolism of ATP and PCr stored in the skeletal muscles is reflected only in the fast component post‐exercise, whereas at exercise intensities above AT, the kinetics of recovery‐period VO2 is composed of two exponential functions: the fast component and the slow component. If one considers the fact that the time point at which after exercise VO2 has decayed by half of the difference between it and rest VO2 (the measurement point of T1/2) occurs within the fast‐component period, we believed that it was possible for exercise‐initial O2 deficit to affect recovery‐period T1/2.

Additionally, we surmised that if exercise intensity is below AT, an inflection point will not be observed (i.e. no slow component will exist). In the recovery‐period VO2 kinetics at exercise intensity above AT, after the O2 deficit from the beginning of exercise to AT compensated, the slow component, which reflects the remaining O2 deficit caused by anaerobic metabolism, becomes prominent. The border between this component and the fast component appears as an inflection point (Figure 5 C and 5 D ).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Schematic diagram of O2 deficit and O2 debt of ramp tests and constant work rate tests. (A) and (B) The during‐exercise O2 deficit corresponds to the post‐exercise O2 debt (grey area). (C) and (D) Adding the O2 deficit (grey area) generated at an exercise intensity below AT (inside dashed line) to the additional O2 deficit (area with slanted lines) generated at an exercise intensity above AT results in the creation of the fast component (solid line). After the O2 deficit generated below AT (dashed line, area E, F) is compensated, the O2 deficit generated above AT (area with slanted lines) remains, and an inflection point occurs (slow component). VO2, oxygen uptake; AT, anaerobic threshold; W‐up, warming up.

T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 in the ramp test

The O2 debt increased along with exercise intensity at the end of exercise (Table 2). However, there was no significant difference in the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 regardless of the increase in exercise intensity. We speculated this to be so because as exercise‐final VO2 increased, and the VO2 decay curve became steeper (and T1/2 shortened). The T1/2 for R‐max was not smaller than that of R‐high. We surmise that this is so because the primary difference between R‐high and R‐max was an increase in anaerobic metabolism, causing an increase in during‐exercise O2 deficit, which was then added after exercise to the fast component.

In the RT in which the exercise‐final intensity was below AT, during‐exercise O2 deficit (alactic) was reflected in the fast component. However, at exercise intensities above AT, while further anaerobic metabolism causes an increase in O2 deficit (lactic), in practice, the O2 debt of anaerobic metabolism is added immediately post‐exercise, thereby increasing the AUC of the fast component of VO2. For this reason, we thought that the VO2 decay steeping by increased in exercise‐final VO2 cancelled the prolongation of T1/2 (Figure 5 D).

Cohen‐Solal et al.1 reported no significant differences in the T1/2 of after exercise VO2 in RT. We presumed that this was because the exercise endpoint in their RT were at an exercise intensity above AT, and according to the previously mentioned reasoning, the increase in O2 deficit caused by during‐exercise anaerobic metabolism was cancelled out by the shortening of T1/2 caused by a higher peak VO2.

Reports suggest that there is an unmeasurable O2 deficit during exercise in RT.12 In this study, we could not measure the O2 deficit either directly or during exercise in RT. However, we conceive that the O2 deficit during the incremental loading should represent the difference of O2 deficit at the beginning of exercise (warming up, 20 W) and O2 debt after exercise, that is, d − a = c (Figure 3 ).

Although we speculated that O2 debt is mainly increased by lactic acid, the elevated temperature and secreted catecholamine may increase the O2 debt even in RT‐low and moderate cases. Therefore, the O2 debt always exceeds the O2 deficit at the beginning of warming up in RTs, and the difference increases with the peak work rate. This phenomenon was also seen below AT.

There may be several reasons for this as follows1: when the subjects are young and healthy as in this study, they may not use up the stored PCr during warming up and may use it for producing ATP during incremental loading.2 Small amounts of lactic acid may be produced during exercise although the exercise intensity is below AT.3 There are effects of increased body temperature, and catecholamine are observed during exercise.7 Additionally, we thought that an increased lactic acid accumulation markedly enhances the O2 debt above AT.

T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 in the submaximal constant work rate test

In the submaximal CT, the T1/2 lengthened as work rate and O2 debt increased (Table 2). We believe this to be because as work rate increases, the ATP necessary to perform work increases, as did the O2 deficit, causing the lengthening of T1/2.

Isaacs et al.13 reported that the O2 deficit from the beginning of exercise to the steady state phase affects to the fast component, whereas the O2 deficit engendered above AT affects the slow component. Similarly, in this study, we observed that at sub‐AT exercise intensities, VO2 reaches a steady state phase, and during‐exercise O2 deficit and post‐exercise O2 debt become essentially equivalent (Table 2). For this reason, we thought that O2 deficit (alactic) corresponds to the post‐exercise fast component (Figure 5 A and 5 B). In the CT‐high condition, we believe that as the anaerobic metabolism becomes a larger proportion, the slow component increases, leading to an extended T1/2 (Figure 5 C). As shown in Table 2, the ratio of the O2 deficit and O2 debt increased from CT‐moderate to CT‐high but not from CT‐low to CT‐moderate. The extension of T1/2 from CT‐low to CT‐moderate simply represents the effect of an increase in O2 deficit at the beginning of exercise. However, the increase in O2 debt from CT‐moderate to CT‐high was believed to be due to the addition of the O2 deficit caused by anaerobic metabolism; a slow component appeared, and the T1/2 was further extended at CT‐high.

Limitations

This study had a limited number of subjects. However, data variance was small, and as far as the physiological interpretation of the data is concerned, our results were meaningful. We measured only VO2 for energy metabolism and did not measure body temperature, blood catecholamine concentration, or blood lactic acid concentration. Thus, our results regarding the realities of energy metabolism are primarily educated guesses.

Clinical implications

In cardiac failure patients, the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 is lengthened,1 and recovery‐period VO2 kinetics are useful in determining the severity of cardiac failure.14, 15 In other words, anaerobic metabolism occurs earlier in those patients,16, 17 causing an enlargement of the slow component, prolonging recovery‐period VO2 kinetics when exercise‐final VO2 is not higher than healthy individuals, and ultimately resulting in a lengthened T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 in comparison to healthy individuals. In RT, even if intensity does not reach maximal levels, if it is high enough, no effect is seen on the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2. Consequently, we can say that as long as it is conducted above AT, the T1/2 of a RT can be useful in the evaluation of cardiac failure in comparison to healthy individuals even if it does not reach symptom limits.

The T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 in CT at moderate or higher intensities, even if they are not symptom limits, can be used to evaluate exercise intolerance and the early occurrence of anaerobic metabolism. As such, submaximal exercise tests may be considered a convenient method for evaluating exercise tolerance in cardiac failure patients.

Conclusions

The intensity at the beginning of exercise affected recovery‐period VO2. If the intensity at the end of exercise was below AT, recovery‐period VO2 kinetics was characterized only by the fast component, whereas if it was above AT, the addition of anaerobic metabolism gave rise to a slow component, and the border these curves were characterized by an inflection point. While the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 occurred within the fast component, the enlargement of the slow component affected the fast component and lengthened T1/2.

In RT, where the work rate at the end of exercise was always the same, a lengthening in the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 was cancelled out by an increase in the intensity at the end of exercise. Thus, even though the exercise intensity increased, T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 did not change. On the other hand, in CT, the T1/2 of recovery‐period VO2 lengthened as exercise intensity increased.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Authors' contributions

Y. I., T. M., T. T., and H. I. contributed to the conception or design of the work. Y. I., T. M., and H. I. contributed to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work. All authors drafted the manuscript. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professors Satomi Kusaka and Toshiki Kutsuna of the Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tokyo University of Technology, and Dr Haruka Itoh of the Keyakizakaue Medical and Dental Clinic for helping with this study.

Ichikawa, Y. , Maeda, T. , Takahashi, T. , Ashikaga, K. , Tanaka, S. , Sumi, Y. , and Itoh, H. (2020) Changes in oxygen uptake kinetics after exercise caused by differences in loading pattern and exercise intensity. ESC Heart Failure, 7: 1109–1117. 10.1002/ehf2.12641.

References

  • 1. Cohen‐Solal A, Laperche T, Morvan D, Geneves M, Caviezel B, Gourgon R. Prolonged kinetics of recovery of oxygen consumption after maximal graded exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 1995; 91: 2924–2932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hagberg JM, Mullin JP, Nagle FJ. Effect of work intensity and duration on recovery O2 . J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1980; 48: 540–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ozyener F, Rossiter HB, Ward SA, Whipp BJ. Influence of exercise intensity on the on‐ and off‐transient kinetics of pulmonary oxygen uptake in humans. J Physiol (Lond) 2001; 533: 891–902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Scheuermann BW, Hoelting BD, Noble ML, Barstow TJ. The slow component of O2 uptake is not accompanied by changes in muscle EMG during repeated bouts of heavy exercise in human. J Physiol (Lond) 2001; 531: 245–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mohler JG, Armstrong BW. The oxygen deficit and debt for normal and non‐athletic men. Respir Physiol 1973; 17: 248–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. McMiken DF. Oxygen deficit and repayment in submaximal exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 1976; 35: 127–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gaesser GA, Brooks GA. Metabolic bases of excess post‐exercise oxygen consumption: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1984; 16: 29–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Shimizu N, Koike A, Koyama Y, Kobayashi K, Marumo F, Hiroe M. Kinetics of pulmonary gas exchange during and while recovering from exercise in patients after anterior myocardial infarction. Jpn Circ J 1999; 63: 459–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Tajima A, Itoh H, Osada N, Omiya K, Maeda T, Ohkoshi N, Kawara T, Aizawa T, Wasserman K. Oxygen uptake kinetics during and after exercise are useful markers of coronary artery disease in patients with exercise electrocardiography suggesting myocardial ischemia. Circ J 2009; 73: 1864–1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wasserman K, Whipp BJ, Koyl SN, Beaver WL. Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1973; 35: 236–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gore CJ, Withers RT. The effect of exercise intensity and duration on the oxygen deficit and excess post‐exercise oxygen consumption. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1990; 60: 169–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Levy WC, Maichel BA, Steele NP, Leclerc KM, Stratton JR. Biomechanical efficiency is decreased in heart failure during low‐level steady state and maximal ramp exercise. Eur J Heart Fail 2004; 6: 917–926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Isaacs K, Glen G, Mccurdy T, Smith L. Modeling energy expenditure and oxygen consumption in human exposure models: accounting for fatigue and EPOC. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2008; 18: 289–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Riley M, Stanford CF, Nicholls DP. Ventilatory and heart rate responses after exercise in chronic cardiac failure. Clin Sci (Lond) 1994; 87: 231–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hayashida W, Kumada T, Kohno F, Noda M, Ishikawa N, Kambayashi M, Kawai C. Post‐exercise oxygen uptake kinetics in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Int J Cardiol 1993; 38: 63–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Dhakal BP, Malhotra R, Murphy RM, Pappagianopoulos PP, Baggish AL, Weiner RB, Houstis NE, Eisman AS, Hough SS, Lewis GD. Mechanisms of exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the role of abnormal peripheral oxygen extraction. Circ Heart Fail 2015; 8: 286–294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Malhotra R, Bakken K, D'Elia E, Lewis GD. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2016; 4: 607–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ESC Heart Failure are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES