Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Free Radic Biol Med. 2020 Apr 21;153:103–111. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.04.008

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation as an underlying mechanism of inorganic phosphate (Pi)-induced mineralization of osteogenic cells

Sana Khalid 1, Hajime Yamazaki 1, Mairobys Socorro 1, Daisy Monier 1, Elia Beniash 1,2, Dobrawa Napierala 1,2
PMCID: PMC7262875  NIHMSID: NIHMS1589023  PMID: 32330587

Abstract

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are a natural byproduct of oxygen metabolism. At physiological levels, ROS regulate multiple cellular processes like proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Increased levels of ROS are associated with pathological conditions, such as inflammation and vascular calcification, where they elicit cytotoxic effects. These contrasting outcomes of ROS have also been reported in osteogenic precursor cells. However, the role of ROS in committed osteogenic cells has not been investigated. Cytotoxic and physiologic effects have also been demonstrated for extracellular phosphate (Pi). Specifically, in committed osteogenic cells Pi stimulates their major function (mineralization), however in osteogenic precursors and endothelial cells Pi cytotoxicity has been reported. Interestingly, Pi cytotoxic effects have been associated with ROS production in the pathological vascular mineralization. In this study, we investigated a molecular mechanistic link between elevated Pi and ROS production in the context of the mineralization function of committed osteogenic cells. Using committed osteogenic cells, 17IIA11 odontoblast-like cell and MLO-A5 osteoblast cell lines, we have unveil that Pi enhances intracellular ROS production. Furthermore, using a combination of mineralization assays and gene expression analyses, we determined that Pi-induced intracellular ROS supports the physiological mineralization process. In contrast, the exogenous ROS, provided in a form of H2O2, was detrimental for osteogenic cells. By comparing molecular signaling cascades induced by extracellular ROS and Pi, we identified differences in signaling routes that determine physiologic versus toxic effect of ROS on osteogenic cells. Specifically, while both extracellular and Pi-induced intracellular ROS utilize Erk1/2 signaling mediator, only extracellular ROS induces stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinases P38 and JNK that are associated with cell death. In summary, our results uncovered a physiological role of ROS in the Pi-induced mineralization through the molecular pathway that is distinct from ROS-induced cytotoxic effects.

Keywords: Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), Inorganic phosphate (Pi), Mineralization, Signaling, Osteogenic cells, Mitogen Activated Protein Kinases (MAPKs)

Graphical Abstract:

graphic file with name nihms-1589023-f0001.jpg

The proposed mechanism underlying differential osteogenic cells responses to Pi-induced intracellular ROS and exogenous ROS: Pi-induced ROS (green) increase mineralization by activating Erk1/2 MAPKs and increasing osteogenic gene expression without inducing osteogenic cell death. Exogenous ROS (red) activates Erk1/2 MAPKs as well stress-associated MAPKs (P38 and JNK1/2), which may drive cytotoxic effect of the extracellular ROS.

Introduction

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) production is a physiological consequence of incomplete reduction of molecular oxygen, which results in generation of superoxide anions (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (OH°) and hydroxide ions (OH) [1]. At physiological levels, ROS regulate multiple cellular processes like proliferation, migration, and differentiation [1]. However, increased levels of ROS may evoke cytotoxic effect and are associated with pathological conditions, such as cancers, neurodegeneration, aging, and vascular calcification [25]. ROS are also produced in osteogenic cells. However, in vitro studies using osteogenic cells have shown increased differentiation as well as induction of cell death by ROS [69]. Thus, the reported outcomes of ROS activation in osteogenic cells are not only inconsistent, but often contradictory as well. These conflicting results may be due to different experimental models used, as effects of ROS depend on the type, concentration, and duration of a stimulus as well as the type of cells subjected to ROS. For example, H2O2 has been reported to inhibit differentiation of osteoblast precursor cells MC3T3-E1 and bone marrow stromal cell line M2–10B4, and enhance pathologic osteogenic differentiation of bovine aortic smooth muscles cells, revealing cell type-specific effects of ROS [4]. In contrast to these results, Naokatu et al. identified ROS as major contributor in MC3T3-E1 osteogenic differentiation [9]. Another study demonstrated that lower concentrations of H2O2 induce differentiation of odontoblasts but not MC3T3-E1 cells, while higher concentrations induced cell death in both cell types [10]. The importance of a stimulus and cell type-specificity of a response was shown in a study of deferoxamine (iron chelator). This study has demonstrated that deferoxamine enhances ROS production, which increases odontoblast differentiation but reduces osteoclast differentiation [7, 11]. In summary, there are multiple studies of ROS in osteogenic precursor cells (both osteoblast and odontoblast precursors), in which the role of ROS in differentiation has been assessed, however, the role of ROS in the function of differentiated osteogenic cells has not been studied.

Several extracellular stimuli, such as hormones, pro-inflammatory cytokines, glucocorticoids, and inorganic ions, influence ROS levels in osteogenic cells [1217]. In particular, inorganic phosphate ion (PO43−, abbreviated here as Pi) is critical for development and homeostasis of all mineralizing tissues by acting as a signaling molecule affecting differentiation and function of cells in skeletal and dental tissues [18, 19]. However, the molecular mechanism underlying Pi-induced mineralization is not well understood. We have previously shown that Pi stimulates the mineralization function of committed osteogenic cells by increasing activity of extracellular signal-related kinases Erk1/2 and expression of genes involved in mineralization, i.e. Dmp1 and Spp1/Opn [20]. The potential role of ROS in Pi signaling has been suggested by a study on mitochondria isolated from rat tissues, where extracellular Pi has been shown to increase mitochondrial H2O2 production [21]. Furthermore, studies of endothelial cells and osteoblast precursor cells MC3T3-E1 have demonstrated that Pi-enhanced ROS production leads to cell death and decreased differentiation, respectively [13, 22]. This role of extracellular Pi and ROS production in cell differentiation and death, provide a rationale to analyze outcomes of Pi and ROS in committed osteogenic cells.

In this study, we use an in vitro approach to investigate the mechanistic link between Pi and ROS production specifically in the context of committed osteogenic cells and their primary function of mineralization of extracellular matrix (ECM). We focused on deciphering the molecular pathways that determine physiological versus cytotoxic effects of ROS during the initiation of the mineralization process. We hypothesize that Pi enhances ROS production in osteogenic cells that plays a role in Pi-induced mineralization.

Material and Methods

Cell lines and cell culture condition

We used mouse 17IIA11 odontoblast-like [20, 2325] and MLO-A5 osteoblast (EKC003, Kerafast) [26] cell lines for this study. Cell lines were maintained as described before [20, 26]. Briefly, 17IIA11 cells were maintained in standard Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Logan, UT) supplemented with 5% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Logan, UT), 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Cellgro, Manassas, VA) at 37°C and 5% CO2. MLO-A5 cells were maintained in alpha Modified Eagle Medium (aMEM, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Logan, UT) supplemented with 5% FBS, 5% FCS, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 1x L-Glutamine at 37°C and 5% CO2 [26]. For analyzing Pi signaling, 1.5 × 106 cells/well were seeded on a 30 mm dish. When cells reached confluence, the growth medium was replaced with low-serum (0.5% FBS) medium for 16–18 h, followed by treatment with 5 mM Pi (in a form of Na-Pi buffer, pH=7.4) for 15 min [20]. For experiments with N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), NAC was added to the medium, 45 min before Pi application. For analyses of gene expression, confluent cells were stimulated with 5 mM Pi for 24 h with or without NAC.

ROS measurements

ROS were assayed as described before [27]. In brief, 6×105 cells per well were seeded in 8-well Lab-Tek chamber slides (Nalge Nunc, Rochester, NY, USA). After reaching confluence, cells were serum starved for 16–18 h and then stimulated with 5 mM Pi or 1 mM H2O2 (positive control), or 20 □l water (negative control) for 15 min followed by staining with 100 nM MitoTracker Red CM-H2XROS (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA) for 30 min at 37°C. Then, medium was replaced with normal growth medium. Images were taken using Nikon Eclipse 90i microscope. For MitoTracker Red, CM-H2XROS 568 nm-filter was used with 1 sec light exposure. For the quantification of signal, grey values were measured using ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij). For each experimental condition, grey values from 100 cells were averaged.

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

RNA was extracted using GenElute Mammalian Total RNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Total RNA (1 μg), after DNase I treatment (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA), was converted to cDNA with SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase kit (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). Gene expression analyses were performed using AB Biosystems 7500 Fast RealTime PCR System and Fast SYBR Green reaction mix (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Primer sequences are: Gapdh F: GCAAGAGAGGCCCTATCCCAA R: CTCCCTAGGCCCCTCCTGTTATT; Opn F: ATGAGGCTGCAGTTCTCCTGG R: AAAGCTTCTTCTCCTCTGAGCTGCC; Dmp1 F: TCTTTGCTGTCGCTGGGGGTATCTTG R: AACATCTCTGTGCAAGCGA.

Western blot analysis

Whole protein extracts from cells were prepared using RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris Cl pH=7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with phosphatase and protease inhibitors (1 mM NaF, 2 mM Na2VO4, 2 mM leupeptin, 2 mM pepstatin, 2 mM PMSF, and 10 μM MG132) or with cOmplete™, EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma). Protein concentration was determined by a Lowry protein assay (Bio-Rad). Protein (10 μg) was subjected to electrophoresis on 4–12% Bis Tris gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Fisher). The specific proteins were detected by using primary antibodies against pErk1/2 (4370), Erk1/2 (4695), Casp-3 (9662), PARP (9542), pSAPK-JNK (4668), pP38 (4511), from Cell Signaling and tubulin (t5168) from Sigma. The blots were developed with the Pierce™ ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Fisher, 32106). The intensity of the bands was measured by ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij) and normalized by tubulin.

Mineralization Assay

The confluent cells on 6-well plate were cultivated in either growth medium or osteogenic medium (50 □g/ml ascorbic acid and 5 mM Pi). Media were changed every other day for 8 days. Mineralization was assessed using alizarin red (for calcium deposits) and von Kossa staining (for phosphate deposits). Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained either with 40 mM alizarin red-S (Sigma) for 10 min or with 5% silver nitrate according to standard protocols. Stained cells were imaged using Nikon TS100 microscope in a bright field.

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis

17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells were cultured in osteogenic or growth media for 9 days. Then cells were washed with saline, collected and lyophilized overnight. Five mg of each lyophilized cell culture sample were ground and mixed with 135 mg of dry potassium bromide (KBr) powder and pressed into a pellet. FTIR spectra from three biological replicates per experimental group were collected at room temperature in the transmission mode with 64 scans per spectrum and the resolution of 4 cm−1, using Bruker Vertex 70 FTIR spectrometer operated by OPUS software (Bruker Optics, Bellerica, MA). The spectra were further processed using Spectrum 10.02 software package (PerkinElmer) in the exactly the same way. Specifically, the automated baseline correction, 5 point running average smoothing and normalization using Amide I peak maximum as 1 were carried out. The crystallinity and mineral to organic ratio analyses were performed using Spectrum software package and Origin Pro 2016 (Origin Lab) according to published procedures [28, 29]. The details of the analyses are described in supplementary materials.

Statistical Analysis

Statistically significant differences were determined using the Student’s t-test except for data where multiple groups were compared with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Experiments were repeated at least 3 times. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism software.

Results

Extracellular Pi stimulates intracellular ROS production in osteogenic cells

To study molecular mechanisms regulating the initiation of the mineralization process we selected 17IIA11 pre-odontoblast and MLO-A5 osteoblast cell lines that have characteristics of committed osteogenic cells, determined by high expression of key osteogenic transcription factors and enzymes required for mineralization. This molecular makeup allows for rapid deposition of mineral in ECM under osteogenic conditions (in the presence of ascorbic acid and elevated Pi; Suppl. Fig. 1A) [2326]. Additional advantage of using these cell lines is the opportunity to determine the conservation of studied interactions and molecular mechanisms in osteogenic cells of different embryonic origin (17IIA11 - cranial neural crest, MLO-A5 - lateral plate mesoderm). First, we verified that 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells respond to Pi by activating Erk1/2 kinases (Suppl. Fig. 1B) and increasing expression of classic Pi-responsive genes Dmp1, Opn (Suppl. Fig. 1C) [18, 3033]. After validating that 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells demonstrate the classic response to Pi, we analyzed Pi-induced ROS production in these cell lines.

Previous studies have shown that Pi enhances ROS production and Oliveira et al. showed that Pi increase mitochondrial ROS production [13, 21, 22]. Therefore, we first compared levels of mitochondrial ROS in 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells maintained in standard growth conditions and upon exposure to elevated extracellular Pi (5 mM) for 15 min. We used this concentration and time point on the basis of previously published work from our lab demonstrating that 5 mM Pi activates Erk1/2 within 15 min in 17IIA11 cells [20] and the results of MLO-A5 characterization experiments detecting the same trend in this cellular model of mineralization (Suppl. Fig. 1B). To detect ROS, we used cell permeable reduced MitoTracker Red CM-H2XROS dye that fluoresces upon oxidation. To mimic the oxidative stress, 1 mM H2O2 was used as a positive control and, as expected, it showed a significant increase in the intensity of fluorescence. Stimulation of both 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 with 5 mM Pi for 15 min resulted in a significant increase in fluorescence intensity indicating increased oxidation of MitoTracker Red by ROS (Fig. 1). Taken together these results demonstrate that Pi increases mitochondrial ROS production in committed osteogenic cells.

Fig. 1. Pi increases intracellular ROS production in osteogenic cells.

Fig. 1.

Summary graphs of quantification of MitoTracker Red CM-H2XRos fluorescence intensities per cell volume for 17IIA11 (A) and MLO-A5 (B) cells revealing increase in ROS-induced fluorescence intensity in the cells stimulated with 5 mM Pi or 1 mM H2O2 for 15 min in comparison with cells receiving water (ctrl). Values are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

Depletion of intracellular ROS reduces Pi-stimulated mineralization

In cell culture system, mineralization is typically induced by supplementing growth medium with ascorbic acid and phosphate (osteogenic medium). Commonly, β-glycerophosphate (βGP) is used as a source of phosphate, which requires alkaline phosphatase production by the cells in order to utilize phosphate provided in this form [25, 34]. Considering previous studies in limb bud mesenchymal cell cultures showing differences in formed mineral depending on the source of phosphate (organic μGP and inorganic Na-Pi), we first tested if using osteogenic medium with μGP versus Pi results in any difference in the quality or quantity of mineral deposited by 17IIA11 cells. FTIR analyses demonstrated that 17IIA11 cells deposit hydroxyapatite when grown in either osteogenic medium as evident from overlapping peaks of pure HA crystal and mineral deposits from 17IIA11 cells (Suppl. Fig. 2A and B). Most importantly, there is no difference in the amount and crystallinity of deposited mineral between the groups exposed to these two sources of phosphate (Suppl. Fig. 2C and D).

After validating our experimental approach, we addressed the biological significance of Pi-induced ROS in mineralization. For this, we depleted ROS from the system using NAC that quenches ROS and is commonly used to identify and test ROS inducers [35]. We compared the extent of mineralization in cells grown in osteogenic medium and in cells treated with NAC prior to exposure to osteogenic medium. As expected, robust mineralization, assessed by quantity of calcium (alizarin red staining, Fig. 2A and B) and phosphate deposits (von Kossa staining, Fig. 2C and D), was detected in both analyzed mineralizing cell models grown in the osteogenic medium for 9 days. However, addition of 10 mM NAC significantly reduced Pi-induced mineralization as demonstrated by decreased alizarin red and von Kossa staining (Fig. 2AD). We further confirmed by FTIR (Fig. 2E and F) that NAC significantly reduced the ratio of mineral to organic components in both 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cell cultures (Fig. 2G and H). Due to the low mineral content it was impossible to measure crystallinity in these samples. Collectively, these results revealed that Pi-induced ROS contributes to mineralization as depleting ROS significantly reduces Pi-induced mineral deposition by osteogenic cells.

Fig. 2. Depletion of ROS by NAC reduces Pi-induced mineralization of osteogenic cells.

Fig. 2.

Representative images of alizarin red (A, B) and von Kossa staining (C, D) of 17IIA11 (left side) and MLO-A5 cells (right side) maintained in growth medium (Ctrl) or osteogenic media (OM) (50 ug/ml ascorbic acid and 5 mM Pi) with or without 10 mM NAC for 9 days. Representative FTIR spectra (E, F) and quantification of mineralization (G, H) for 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells. Values are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; *p<0.05. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Pi-induced ROS is not detrimental for osteogenic cells

In an in vitro model of vascular pathology caused by hyperphosphatemia, high extracellular Pi has been shown to cause endothelial cell death through ROS-dependent mechanisms [22]. Considering this and other studies showing that ROS as well as Pi may have cytotoxic effects [36, 37], our next step was to determine whether the uncovered involvement of ROS in Pi-induced mineralization is a physiological response of osteogenic cells or if it reflects cytotoxicity of elevated Pi. First, we compared levels of cleaved forms of caspase-3 and PARP (molecular markers of apoptotic cell death) in 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells incubated in osteogenic medium for 24 h and in cells maintained in growth medium. Along with this, we employed H2O2 as an exogenous source of ROS to determine its effect on 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells. Protein analysis using Western blot revealed no significant difference in cleaved PARP or caspase-3 between cells in osteogenic medium and standard growth medium (Fig. 3A), while H2O2 treated cells have increased cleaved PARP and caspase-3 levels indicative of apoptosis. We further evaluated 17IIA11 cell viability upon Pi treatment by MTT assay. Our results demonstrate that 24 h Pi exposure significantly increased metabolic activity/proliferation of 17IIA11 cells. In contrast, 1 mM H2O2 treatment for the same duration significantly reduced cellular survival when compared to cells treated with 5 mM Pi and untreated cells (Suppl. Fig. 3A). These results demonstrate that Pi does not induce death of 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells. Hence, unlike the extracellular ROS (provided in the form of H2O2), Pi-induced endogenous ROS is not detrimental for osteogenic cells.

Fig. 3. Pi-induced ROS is not detrimental for osteogenic cells.

Fig. 3.

Representative Western blots showing cleaved PARP and Caspase-3 in 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells after 24 h (A) and 9 days (B) in either growth medium (Ctrl) or OM (50 ug/ml ascorbic acid and Pi 5 mM) with and without 10 mM NAC. α-tubulin was used as a control for protein loading. (n = 3 independent experiments).

Next, to evaluate whether reduced mineralization observed in osteogenic cells treated with ROS scavenger NAC (Fig. 2AD) is due to deleterious effects of NAC on osteogenic cells, we also analyzed levels of cleaved PARP and caspase-3 in cells incubated in Pi-containing osteogenic medium supplemented with 10 mM NAC. During the short-term 24 h incubation, we observed no difference in cleaved PARP and caspase-3 levels between the cells incubated with either growth medium, Pi-containing osteogenic medium or Pi-containing osteogenic medium supplemented with 10 mM NAC (Fig. 3A). Microscopic analyses of 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells and nuclei morphology (Suppl. Fig. 3B) further corroborated our conclusion that neither Pi nor NAC treatment exert toxic effects on cells. We also assessed potential increase of cell death of 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells exposed to elevated Pi with or without NAC for 9 days, when mineralization reaches the plateau. Western blot analyses of cleaved PARP and caspase-3 detected no increase in apoptosis markers during long-term exposure of cells to these external stimuli (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that the cell death is not a predominant osteogenic cells response to elevated extracellular Pi neither to NAC at those experimental conditions.

In summary, these results demonstrate that NAC-mediated inhibition of Pi-induced mineralization is due to depletion of ROS rather than osteogenic cell death.

Extracellular ROS and Pi increase Erk1/2 activity in osteogenic cells

Although little is known about Pi signaling, it has been shown that in osteogenic cells, Pi activates Erk1/2 kinase and expression of osteogenic markers osteopontin (Opn) and Dentin Matrix Protein 1 (Dmp1) [20, 25, 32, 38]. Therefore, to identify a molecular link between Pi and ROS production in the mineralization process, we first compared H2O2-stimulated Erk1/2 activation with Pi-stimulated Erk1/2 activation. As expected, protein analyses by Western blot detected a significant increase in Erk1/2 phosphorylation in cells exposed to 5 mM Pi (Fig. 4A and C). Importantly, these analyses also revealed a dose-dependent increase in Erk1/2 phosphorylation after 15 min of H2O2 treatment in both 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells (Fig. 4A and C). Next, we analyzed whether extracellular ROS, in a form of H2O2, affects expression of osteogenic genes Dmp1 and Opn, which are targets of Pi signaling. Considering that 1mM H2O2 has a toxic effect on cells exposed to such high concentration of this form of ROS for 24h (Fig. 3), we used lower concentrations of H2O2 to test the hypothesis that ROS at lower levels stimulate osteogenic response but at higher concentration are detrimental. qRT-PCR analysis of RNA from 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells treated with H2O2 for 18 h revealed that 0.03 and 0.06 mM H2O2 is sufficient to significantly increase Dmp1 and Opn expression in 17IIA11 cells. In MLO-A5 cells a significant increase in Dmp1 and Opn expression was detected at 0.12 and 0.25 mM H2O2 (Fig. 4B and D). Together, these results show that extracellular ROS elicit a similar molecular response as Pi does in osteogenic cells, which suggests an existence of a cross-talk between their molecular pathways.

Fig. 4. Exogenous ROS (H2O2) increase Erk1/2 activity and osteogenic gene expression in osteogenic cells.

Fig. 4.

Representative Western blots and graphs (showing densitometry-based quantification of the Western blot results by ImageJ) of activated Erk1/2 in 17IIA11 cells 15 min after stimulation with H2O2 and 5 mM Pi (A). α-tubulin was used as the protein loading control. qRT-PCR showing Dmp1 and Opn expression in 17IIA11 cells 18 h after stimulation with H2O2 (B). Representative Western blots and graphs (showing densitometry-based quantification of the Western blot results by ImageJ) of activated Erk1/2 in MLO-A5 cells 15 min after stimulation with H2O2 and 5 mM Pi (C). α-tubulin was used as the protein loading control. qRT-PCR showing Dmp1 and Opn expression in MLO-A5 cells 18 h after stimulation with H2O2 (D). Values are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***P≤0.001.

Extracellular ROS but not Pi activate stress activated protein kinases (SAPK)

After determining that either H2O2 or Pi increase Erk1/2 (MAPK) activity and Dmp1 and Opn expression (Fig. 4), but only high (1mM) concentration of H2O2 for 24 h induces cell death (Fig. 3A and Suppl. Fig. 3A), our next step was to identify the molecular mechanism underlying the observed difference in the cell survival outcome. Previous studies have shown that activation of stress-activated protein kinases JNK and P38 (MAPKs) by ROS induce cell death in various cellular models [36, 3942]. Therefore, we first analyzed activation of P38 and JNK upon H2O2 application. Western blot analyses revealed that 1 mM H2O2 exerts statistically significant increases in both P38 and JNK kinases activity within 15 min of application in 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells (Fig. 5A). Next, we compared the effect of H2O2 and Pi on P38 and JNK activity. Our results reveal that stimulation of cells with 5 mM Pi had no effect on stress-associated kinases activity, as opposed to 1 mM H2O2, which significantly increases P38 and JNK activity (Fig. 5B). As a positive control of activated cellular response to Pi, we used pErk1/2 detection by Western blot, which confirmed activation of Pi signaling in this experiment. These results reveal a difference in osteogenic cell responses to extracellular ROS and Pi, which may explain different outcomes of osteogenic cells exposure to these stimuli, i.e. increased mineralization in response to Pi and increased cell death in response to high extracellular ROS.

Fig. 5. Exogenous ROS but not Pi activate stress-activated MAPKs.

Fig. 5.

Representative Western blots and graphs (showing densitometry-based quantification of the Western blot results by ImageJ) showing increased levels of activated P38 and JNK1/2 in 17IIA11 cells stimulated with indicated concentration of H2O2 for 15 min (A). Western blots and quantification graphs showing increased levels of activated P38 and JNK in 17IIA11 cells 15 min after stimulation with 1 mM H2O2 but not by 5 mM Pi (B). Values are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01.

Depletion of ROS impairs Pi-induced Erk1/2 activity and osteogenic gene expression

To understand the role of Pi-induced ROS in regulation of early molecular events supporting osteogenic cell function, we analyzed the consequences of ROS depletion on Pi-induced Erk1/2 activity and gene expression. For that, ROS scavenger NAC was used 45 min before the stimulation of 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells with 5 mM Pi. Quantitative Western blot analyses revealed that 10 mM NAC completely abolished activation of Erk1/2 in response to Pi (Fig. 6A and B). The dampen cellular response to Pi upon ROS depletion was further demonstrated at the gene expression level, where qRT-PCR data revealed that activation of Opn expression by Pi is significantly reduced by NAC (Fig. 6C, F). These results demonstrate that ROS plays an important role in activation of cellular response to Pi.

Fig. 6. Depletion of ROS impairs activation of Erk1/2 and osteogenic gene expression in response to Pi.

Fig. 6.

Representative Western blots and quantification graphs of Erk1/2 activity in 17IIA11 (A, B) and MLO-A5 cells (D, E) after 15 min of stimulation with Pi. NAC 10 mM was applied 45 min before Pi. qRT-PCR analysis of Pi-induced expression of Opn in 17IIA11 (C) and MLO-A5 (F) after 24 h of stimulation with Pi ±10 mM NAC. Values are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001, ****p≤0.0001 (ANOVA).

Discussion

In the majority of cell types, elevated extracellular Pi, similarly to high extracellular ROS, causes cell stress that may lead to cell death [4, 10, 13, 22]. However, in osteogenic cells, Pi stimulates their physiologic function, namely formation of mineralized ECM, raising a question about the involvement of Pi-induced ROS in mineralization. In this study, we have used committed osteogenic cells to investigate the role of ROS in determining the outcomes of the exposure of osteogenic cells to elevated Pi. We have uncovered that Pi enhances intracellular ROS production in osteogenic cells. Furthermore, our results revealed that, unlike extracellular ROS, which is detrimental for osteogenic cells, Pi-induced intracellular ROS plays a critical role in the physiological mineralization process. By comparing molecular signaling induced by extracellular ROS and Pi, we identified differences in signaling routes that determine physiologic versus toxic effects of ROS on the osteogenic cells. Specifically, while both extracellular and Pi- induced intracellular ROS utilize Erk1/2 signaling mediator, only extracellular ROS induces stress-activated MAPKs P38 and JNK that are associated with cell death. In summary, our results demonstrated a novel physiological role of ROS in the Pi-induced mineralization through the molecular pathway that is distinct from ROS-induced cytotoxic effects.

Bone is a mineralized connective tissue that is continuously remodeled through the specialized actions of bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Many systemic and local factors contribute to bone homeostasis by regulating bone cells function, survival, and death. ROS have been implicated in bone homeostasis by regulating fundamental processes including proliferation, differentiation, and cell death [17, 4345]. Stimuli like glucocorticoids, Ca2+, PTH, cytokines have been shown to produce ROS in osteogenic cells in various experimental settings with different functional outcomes [1418]. The role of ROS in attenuating osteogenic differentiation has been demonstrated in rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and OB-6 osteoblastic cell line [46, 47]. However, the cellular effects of ROS may differ depending on cell differentiation stage, due to different molecular makeup of progenitor versus mature cells. Therefore it is important to distinguish functions of ROS in progenitor cells from those in mature cells as some defects of mineralized tissues, like osteomalacia [4850], are due to disturbed function of differentiated osteoblasts. However, the role of ROS in the physiology and function of mature osteogenic cells has not been evaluated yet. The major function of mature osteogenic cells is secretion and mineralization of ECM. In this study, we showed that extracellular Pi, which is a major stimulus initiating and supporting the mineralization process, increases levels of intracellular ROS (Fig. 1). Furthermore, by depleting ROS in Pi-stimulated osteogenic cells, we determined that Pi-generated ROS are a functional protagonist in the mineralization process (Fig. 2).

ROS have long been considered as a potential detrimental byproduct of the aerobic metabolism that has a negative effect on cell functions and survival (oxidative stress). It is now recognized that ROS generated at sub-toxic levels by different intracellular systems act as signaling molecules and mediate important physiological functions (redox biology). This dual constructive/destructive effect has also been suggested for Pi-induced ROS. For example, in an in vitro model of osteogenic differentiation (MC3T3-E1 cell line), Pi-induced ROS suppressed differentiation by inhibiting expression of osteogenic markers: alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and Runx2, suggesting the negative effect of Pi-induced ROS in physiological osteogenic differentiation [13]. However, Pi-induced ROS has been also shown to enhance transdifferentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells into osteoblastic cells, which is one of the suggested pathomechanisms underlying medial vascular calcification [51]. In addition, Pi-generated ROS has been shown to induce apoptosis in endothelial cells, adding to the diversity of effects of Pi-induced ROS in various cell types [22]. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first one that addressed the role of ROS in the function of differentiated osteogenic cells. Our results revealed that Pi-induced intracellular ROS support physiologic mineralization, as demonstrated by FTIR analyses (Fig. 2), without inducing cell death (Fig. 3). These results suggest that Pi, as a stimulus of physiological mineralization, generates levels of ROS that are in physiological range and support the physiological function of mature osteogenic cells.

The effects evoked by ROS differ not only depending on the cell type, but also on the site of ROS production (intracellular versus extracellular). This means that the same cell type may respond to the extracellular ROS differently than to the ROS produced intracellularly in response to extracellular stimuli. However, this has not been well-studied in osteogenic cells [17, 46]. In this study we have compared the effect of extracellular ROS (in the form of H2O2) and Pi-induced intracellular ROS in osteogenic cells. We found that both sources of ROS activate Erk1/2 kinase (Fig. 4 and 6). Extracellular ROS also increased the expression of classic Pi-responsive genes Dmp1 and Opn, although the magnitude of this activation was far lower than activation of these genes by Pi (Fig. 4 and 6C, F, and published data [25, 52]). However, unlike Pi, extracellular ROS is also detrimental for osteogenic cells as demonstrated by activation of apoptotic markers (cleaved PARP and caspase-3) and decreased metabolic activity of cells (Fig. 3, Suppl. Fig. 3). These results reveal that osteogenic cells respond differently to ROS depending whether ROS are provided as an extracellular stimulus or generated inside cells in response to Pi.

Contrasting outcomes of extracellular and Pi-induced intracellular ROS in osteogenic cells prompted us to investigate a potential overlap and differences in molecular pathways activated by these two types of extracellular stimuli. Although Pi signaling cascade is largely unknown, it has been established that Pi activates Erk1/2 in osteogenic cells [18, 20, 53, 54]. While Erk1/2 kinases can be activated by various stimuli, hence are considered “non-specific”, our previous studies demonstrated a specific role of Pi-activated Erk1/2 in release of matrix vesicles (MVs), which support the initiation of mineralization [20]. In this study, we found that in mature osteogenic cells both Pi and extracellular ROS activate Erk1/2 (Fig. 4). Importantly, we demonstrated that activation of Erk1/2 in response to Pi is diminished by ROS scavenger NAC (Fig. 6), placing ROS in the Pi signaling cascade in mature osteogenic cells.

Erk1/2 is one of three members of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK). The other two, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and the P38 kinase, also called stress activated kinases, can induce pathological cell death [39, 40, 42, 55]. Studies in MC3T3-E1 osteogenic precursor cells have demonstrated that Pi does not alter P38 and JNK activity [56]. Our data from 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells demonstrate that this is also true in mature osteogenic cells (Fig. 5). In contrast to Pi, stress-activated kinases JNK and P38 are induced by H2O2 (Fig. 5). These results reveal that mature osteogenic cells do not perceive elevated extracellular Pi as a stress factor, but as a physiological cue that supports their major function. Thus, these results increase our understanding of both the Pi signaling and ROS signaling pathways in mature osteogenic cells.

In this study, we implicated ROS in Pi-initiated molecular events leading to mineralization, by demonstrating that exogenous Pi stimulates ROS production in cells committed to formation of mineralized ECM. However, it is important to note that cellular ROS homeostasis is balanced by ROS production and detoxification of ROS by the antioxidant system. This system includes enzymatic ROS scavengers such as, Superoxide dismutases (SOD), Glutathione Peroxidase (GPxs), Thioredoxin (Trx), as well as nonenzymatic/exogenous antioxidants (for example: ascorbic acid, vitamin E and carotenoids) [57, 58]. In the in vitro cellular models of mineralization, ascorbic acid is used together with Pi to stimulate osteogenic differentiation and formation of mineralized ECM. Therefore, it is likely that the role of ascorbic acid in osteogenic differentiation and mineralization is not limited to stimulation of collagen production [5961], but extends to maintaining ROS homeostasis. In this study our focus was placed on early signaling events initiated by Pi. Our follow up study will address the regulatory role of the antioxidant system in Pi-induced mineralization to investigate whether this arm of intracellular ROS regulation can be targeted in mineralization-associated pathologies.

A clear understanding of the role of ROS in various signaling pathways regulating cell differentiation and function, as well as in pathological processes will allow us to develop therapeutic strategies enhancing positive effects of ROS and minimizing the negative ones. Recent clinical trials targeting redox status of cancer cells demonstrate a significant benefit of redox-based therapies [58, 62, 63]. We have shown that intracellular ROS is involved in Pi-induced mineralization function of committed osteogenic cells, which provides a novel physiological function of ROS. Based on our data, we anticipate that by modulating Pi-induced ROS production it is possible to modulate the mineralization process. Such approaches could be used to stimulate mineralized tissue repair or to prevent vascular calcification in hyperphosphatemic conditions.

Supplementary Material

MMC1

Supplementary Fig. 1. Verification of cellular models of Pi-induced mineralization. Alizarin red staining showing calcium deposits (mineralization) in 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells grown in osteogenic medium (50 ug/ml ascorbic acid and 5 mM Pi) for 6 and 8 days (A). Representative Western blots revealing dose-dependent increase of pErk1/2 after 15 min of 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells stimulation with 2, 5 and 10 mM Pi. α-tubulin was used as a protein loading control (B). qRT-PCR analysis revealing increased expression of Dmp1 and Opn (fold change) in 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells after 24 h of stimulation with 5 mM Pi. (C). Values are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

Supplementary Fig. 2. Replacing βGP with inorganic Pi in osteogenic medium did not affect mineral quality and quantity. Representative FTIR spectra of 17IIA11-produced ECM: (A) full range spectrum encompassing inorganic and organic material analyses (0–4000 cm-1) and (B) higher resolution of the spectrum in the range for mineral analysis (400–800 cm-1) obtained by FTIR. The values obtained from FTIR analyses with respect to average Cap/Amide I ratio (C) and crystallinity (amorphous CaP to crystal ratios) (D). Values are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; *p<0.05.

Supplementary Fig. 3. Pi-induced ROS is not detrimental for osteogenic cells. (A) MTT assay results for 17IIA11 cells cultured in the growth medium containing either 5 mM Pi or 1 mM H2O2 for 24 h. Values are mean ± S.D. of three technical repeats; ***p ≤ 0.001). (B) Microscopic images of DAPI fluorescent staining and bright field images of 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells. Cells were maintained in growth medium (Ctrl), OM or OM+NAC medium. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Highlights.

  • Inorganic phosphate (Pi) generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) in committed osteogenic cells.

  • Both exogenous ROS and Pi-induced intracellular ROS utilize Erk1/2 signaling mediator, however only exogenous ROS induces stress activated kinases P38 and JNK.

  • In contrast to exogenous ROS, Pi-induced endogenous ROS is not detrimental to osteogenic cells.

  • ROS generated in response to Pi contributes to physiological function of osteogenic cells.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Drs. Odile Kellermann and Anne Poliard for providing the 17IIA11 cell line. Research reported in this publication was supported by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, and National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under awards number DE023083 and AR074981, respectively (to D.N.), and by the Center for Craniofacial Regeneration, School of Dental Medicine University of Pittsburgh. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • [1].Droge W, Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function, Physiological reviews 82(1) (2002) 47–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Floyd RA, Role of oxygen free radicals in carcinogenesis and brain ischemia, The FASEB journal 4(9) (1990) 2587–2597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Shigenaga MK, Hagen TM, Ames BN, Oxidative damage and mitochondrial decay in aging, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91(23) (1994) 10771–10778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Mody N, Parhami F, Sarafian TA, Demer LL, Oxidative stress modulates osteoblastic differentiation of vascular and bone cells, Free Radical Biology Medicine 31(4) (2001) 509–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Jenner P, Oxidative damage in neurodegenerative disease, The Lancet 344(8925) (1994) 796–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Domazetovic V, Marcucci G, Iantomasi T, Brandi ML, Vincenzini MT, Oxidative stress in bone remodeling: role of antioxidants, Clinical Cases in Mineral Bone Metabolism 14(2) (2017) 209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Wang X, Wu TT, Jiang L, Rong D, Zhu YQJCP, Biochemistry, Deferoxamine-induced migration and odontoblast differentiation via ROS-dependent autophagy in dental pulp stem cells, Cellular Physiology Biochemistry 43(6) (2017) 2535–2547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Atashi F, Modarressi A, Pepper MS, The role of reactive oxygen species in mesenchymal stem cell adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation: a review, Stem cells development 24(10) (2015) 1150–1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Arakaki N, Yamashita A, Niimi S, Yamazaki T, Involvement of reactive oxygen species in osteoblastic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells accompanied by mitochondrial morphological dynamics, Biomedical Research 34(3) (2013) 161–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Lee D, Lim B-S, Lee Y-K, Yang H-C, Effects of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2) on alkaline phosphatase activity and matrix mineralization of odontoblast and osteoblast cell lines, Cell biology toxicology 22(1) (2006) 39–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Zhang J, Hu W, Ding C, Yao G, Zhao H, Wu S, Deferoxamine inhibits iron-uptake stimulated osteoclast differentiation by suppressing electron transport chain and MAPKs signaling, Toxicology letters (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Terruzzi I, Montesano A, Senesi P, Villa I, Ferraretto A, Bottani M, Vacante F, Spinello A, Bolamperti S, Luzi L, L-Carnitine Reduces Oxidative Stress and Promotes Cells Differentiation and Bone Matrix Proteins Expression in Human Osteoblast-Like Cells, BioMed research international 2019 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Okamoto T, Taguchi M, Osaki T, Fukumoto S, Fujita T, Phosphate enhances reactive oxygen species production and suppresses osteoblastic differentiation, Journal of bone mineral metabolism 32(4) (2014) 393–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Li X, Garcia J, Lu J, Iriana S, Kalajzic I, Rowe D, Demer LL, Tintut Y, Roles of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Receptor and Reactive Oxygen Species in Hyperlipidemia-Induced PTH Resistance in Preosteoblasts, Journal of cellular biochemistry 115(1) (2014) 179–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Jallali N, Ridha H, Thrasivoulou C, Butler P, Cowen T, Modulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species level in chondrocytes by IGF-1, FGF, and TGF-β1, Connective tissue research 48(3) (2007) 149–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Qiu X, Wang X, Qiu J, Zhu Y, Liang T, Gao B, Wu Z, Lian C, Peng Y, Liang A, Melatonin Rescued Reactive Oxygen Species-Impaired Osteogenesis of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Presence of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha, Stem cells international 2019 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Almeida M, Han L, Martin-Millan M, Plotkin LI, Stewart SA, Roberson PK, Kousteni S, O’Brien CA, Bellido T, Parfitt AM, Skeletal involution by age-associated oxidative stress and its acceleration by loss of sex steroids, Journal of Biological Chemistry 282(37) (2007) 27285–27297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Khoshniat S, Bourgine A, Julien M, Petit M, Pilet P, Rouillon T, Masson M, Gatius M, Weiss P, Guicheux J, Phosphate-dependent stimulation of MGP and OPN expression in osteoblasts via the ERK1/2 pathway is modulated by calcium, Bone 48(4) (2011) 894–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Beck GR Jr, Moran E, Knecht N, Inorganic phosphate regulates multiple genes during osteoblast differentiation, including Nrf2, Experimental cell research 288(2) (2003) 288–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Chaudhary SC, Kuzynski M, Bottini M, Beniash E, Dokland T, Mobley CG, Yadav MC, Poliard A, Kellermann O, Millán JL, Phosphate induces formation of matrix vesicles during odontoblast-initiated mineralization in vitro, Matrix Biology 52 (2016) 284–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Oliveira GA, Kowaltowski AJ, Phosphate increases mitochondrial reactive oxygen species release, Free radical research 38(10) (2004) 1113–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Di Marco GS, Hausberg M, Hillebrand U, Rustemeyer P, Wittkowski W, Lang D, Pavenstadt H, Increased inorganic phosphate induces human endothelial cell apoptosis in vitro, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology 294(6) (2008) F1381–F1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Priam F, Ronco V, Locker M, Bourd K, Bonnefoix M, Duchêne T, Bitard J, Wurtz T, Kellermann O, Goldberg M, New cellular models for tracking the odontoblast phenotype, Archives of oral biology 50(2) (2005) 271–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Lacerda-Pinheiro S, Dimitrova-Nakov S, Harichane Y, Souyri M, Petit-Cocault L, Legrès L, Marchadier A, Baudry A, Ribes S, Goldberg M, Concomitant multipotent and unipotent dental pulp progenitors and their respective contribution to mineralised tissue formation, Eur Cell Mater 23 (2012) 371–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Kuzynski M, Goss M, Bottini M, Yadav MC, Mobley C, Winters T, Poliard A, Kellermann O, Lee B, Millan JL, Dual role of the Trps1 transcription factor in dentin mineralization, Journal of Biological Chemistry 289(40) (2014) 27481–27493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Kato Y, Boskey A, Spevak L, Dallas M, Hori M, Bonewald L, Establishment of an osteoid preosteocyte-like cell MLO-A5 that spontaneously mineralizes in culture, Journal of Bone Mineral Research 16(9) (2001) 1622–1633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Khalid S, Drasche A, Thurner M, Hermann M, Ashraf MI, Fresser F, Baier G, Kremser L, Lindner H, Troppmair J, cJun N-terminal kinase (JNK) phosphorylation of serine 36 is critical for p66Shc activation, Scientific reports 6 (2016) 20930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Gadaleta S, Camacho N, Mendelsohn R, Boskey A, Fourier transform infrared microscopy of calcified turkey leg tendon, Calcified Tissue International 58(1) (1996) 17–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Garimella R, Bi X, Anderson HC, Camacho NP, Nature of phosphate substrate as a major determinant of mineral type formed in matrix vesicle-mediated in vitro mineralization: an FTIR imaging study, Bone 38(6) (2006) 811–817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Lundquist P, Murer H, Biber J, Type II Na+-Pi cotransporters in osteoblast mineral formation: regulation by inorganic phosphate, Cellular Physiology biochemistry 19(1–4) (2007) 43–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Shalhoub V, Shatzen E, Ward S, Young JI, Boedigheimer M, Twehues L, McNinch J, Scully S, Twomey B, Baker D, Chondro/osteoblastic and cardiovascular gene modulation in human artery smooth muscle cells that calcify in the presence of phosphate and calcitriol or paricalcitol, Journal of cellular biochemistry 111(4) (2010) 911–921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Camalier CE, Yi M, Yu LR, Hood BL, Conrads KA, Lee YJ, Lin Y, Garneys LM, Bouloux GF, Young MR, An integrated understanding of the physiological response to elevated extracellular phosphate, Journal of cellular physiology 228(7) (2013) 1536–1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Rendenbach C, Yorgan T, Heckt T, Otto B, Baldauf C, Jeschke A, Streichert T, David J, Amling M, Schinke T, Effects of extracellular phosphate on gene expression in murine osteoblasts, Calcified Tissue International 94(5) (2014) 474–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Kyllönen L, Haimi S, Mannerström B, Huhtala H, Rajala KM, Skottman H, Sándor GK, Miettinen S, Effects of different serum conditions on osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells in vitro, Stem cell research therapy 4(1) (2013) 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Halasi M, Wang M, Chavan TS, Gaponenko V, Hay N, Gartel AL, ROS inhibitor N-acetyl-L-cysteine antagonizes the activity of proteasome inhibitors, Biochemical Journal 454(2) (2013) 201–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Redza-Dutordoir M, Averill-Bates DA, Activation of apoptosis signalling pathways by reactive oxygen species, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta -Molecular Cell Research 1863(12) (2016) 2977–2992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Meleti Z, Shapiro I, Adams CS, Inorganic phosphate induces apoptosis of osteoblast-like cells in culture, Bone 27(3) (2000) 359–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Franceschi RT, Ge C, Xiao G, Roca H, Jiang D, Transcriptional regulation of osteoblasts, Cells Tissues Organs 189(1–4) (2009) 144–152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Park GB, Choi Y, Kim YS, Lee H-K, Kim D, Hur DY, ROS-mediated JNK/p38-MAPK activation regulates Bax translocation in Sorafenib-induced apoptosis of EBV-transformed B cells, International journal of oncology 44(3) (2014) 977–985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Park GB, Kim YS, Lee H-K, Song H, Cho D-H, Lee WJ, Hur DY, Endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis of EBV-transformed B cells by cross-linking of CD70 is dependent upon generation of reactive oxygen species and activation of p38 MAPK and JNK pathway, The Journal of Immunology 185(12) (2010) 7274–7284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Zhang J, Wang X, Vikash V, Ye Q, Wu D, Liu Y, Dong W, ROS and ROS-mediated cellular signaling, Oxidative medicine cellular longevity 2016 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].McCubrey JA, LaHair MM, Franklin RA, Reactive oxygen species-induced activation of the MAP kinase signaling pathways, Antioxidants redox signaling 8(9–10) (2006) 1775–1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Shi C, Wu J, Yan Q, Wang R, Miao D, Bone marrow ablation demonstrates that estrogen plays an important role in osteogenesis and bone turnover via an antioxidative mechanism, Bone 79 (2015) 94–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Kim HS, Nam ST, Mun SH, Lee S-K, Kim HW, Park YH, Kim B, Won K-J, Kim H-R, Park Y-M, DJ-1 controls bone homeostasis through the regulation of osteoclast differentiation, Nature communications 8(1) (2017) 1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Rached M-T, Kode A, Xu L, Yoshikawa Y, Paik J-H, DePinho RA, Kousteni S, FoxO1 is a positive regulator of bone formation by favoring protein synthesis and resistance to oxidative stress in osteoblasts, Cell metabolism 11(2) (2010) 147–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Almeida M, Han L, Martin-Millan M, O’Brien CA, Manolagas SC, Oxidative stress antagonizes Wnt signaling in osteoblast precursors by diverting β-catenin from T cell factor-to forkhead box O-mediated transcription, Journal of Biological Chemistry 282(37) (2007) 27298–27305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Liu Z, Li T, Deng S.n., Fu S, Zhou X, He Y, Radiation Induces Apoptosis and Osteogenic Impairment through miR-22-Mediated Intracellular Oxidative Stress in Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Stem cells international 2018 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].White KE, Evans WE, O’Riordan JL, Speer MC, Econs MJ, Lorenz-Depiereux B, Grabowski M, Meitinger T, Strom TM, Autosomal dominant hypophosphataemic rickets is associated with mutations in FGF23, Nature genetics 26(3) (2000) 345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Shimada T, Kakitani M, Yamazaki Y, Hasegawa H, Takeuchi Y, Fujita T, Fukumoto S, Tomizuka K, Yamashita T, Targeted ablation of Fgf23 demonstrates an essential physiological role of FGF23 in phosphate and vitamin D metabolism, The Journal of clinical investigation 113(4) (2004) 561–568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Francis F, Hennig S, Korn B, Reinhardt R, De Jong P, Poustka A, Lehrach H, Rowe P, Goulding J, Summerfield T, A gene (PEX) with homologies to endopeptidases is mutated in patients with X–linked hypophosphatemic rickets, Nature genetics 11(2) (1995) 130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Byon CH, Javed A, Dai Q, Kappes JC, Clemens TL, Darley-Usmar VM, McDonald JM, Chen Y, Oxidative stress induces vascular calcification through modulation of the osteogenic transcription factor Runx2 by AKT signaling, Journal of Biological Chemistry 283(22) (2008) 15319–15327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Fatherazi S, Matsa-Dunn D, Foster B, Rutherford R, Somerman M, Presland R, Phosphate regulates osteopontin gene transcription, Journal of dental research 88(1) (2009) 39–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Chaudhary SC, Khalid S, Smethurst V, Monier D, Mobley J, Huet A, Conway JF, Napierala D, Proteomic profiling of extracellular vesicles released from vascular smooth muscle cells during initiation of phosphate-induced mineralization, Connective tissue research 59(sup1) (2018) 55–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Tada H, Nemoto E, Foster BL, Somerman MJ, Shimauchi H, Phosphate increases bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression through cAMP-dependent protein kinase and ERK1/2 pathways in human dental pulp cells, Bone 48(6) (2011) 1409–1416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Kallunki T, JNK Subfamily, Encyclopedia of Cancer (2011) 1927–1928. [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Beck GR, Knecht N, Osteopontin regulation by inorganic phosphate is ERK1/2-, protein kinase C-, and proteasome-dependent, Journal of Biological Chemistry 278(43) (2003) 41921–41929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Bouayed J, Bohn T, Exogenous antioxidants—double-edged swords in cellular redox state: health beneficial effects at physiologic doses versus deleterious effects at high doses, Oxidative medicine cellular longevity 3(4) (2010) 228–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Trachootham D, Alexandre J, Huang P, Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: a radical therapeutic approach?, Nature reviews Drug discovery 8(7) (2009) 579–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Murad S, Grove D, Lindberg K, Reynolds G, Sivarajah A, Pinnell S, Regulation of collagen synthesis by ascorbic acid, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 78(5) (1981) 2879–2882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Tajima S, Pinnell SR, Regulation of collagen synthesis by ascorbic acid. Ascorbic acid increases type I procollagen mRNA, Biochemical biophysical research communications 106(2) (1982) 632–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Harada SI, Matsumoto T, Ogata E, Role of ascorbic acid in the regulation of proliferation in osteoblast-like MC3T3-El cells, Journal of Bone Mineral Research 6(9) (1991) 903–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Bahlis NJ, McCafferty-Grad J, Jordan-McMurry I, Neil J, Reis I, Kharfan-Dabaja M, Eckman J, Goodman M, Fernandez HF, Boise LH, Feasibility and correlates of arsenic trioxide combined with ascorbic acid-mediated depletion of intracellular glutathione for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, Clinical cancer research 8(12) (2002) 3658–3668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Chaiswing L, St. Clair WH, St. Clair DK, Redox Paradox: A novel approach to therapeutics-resistant cancer, Antioxidants redox signaling 29(13) (2018) 1237–1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

MMC1

Supplementary Fig. 1. Verification of cellular models of Pi-induced mineralization. Alizarin red staining showing calcium deposits (mineralization) in 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells grown in osteogenic medium (50 ug/ml ascorbic acid and 5 mM Pi) for 6 and 8 days (A). Representative Western blots revealing dose-dependent increase of pErk1/2 after 15 min of 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells stimulation with 2, 5 and 10 mM Pi. α-tubulin was used as a protein loading control (B). qRT-PCR analysis revealing increased expression of Dmp1 and Opn (fold change) in 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells after 24 h of stimulation with 5 mM Pi. (C). Values are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; *p<0.05, **p<0.01.

Supplementary Fig. 2. Replacing βGP with inorganic Pi in osteogenic medium did not affect mineral quality and quantity. Representative FTIR spectra of 17IIA11-produced ECM: (A) full range spectrum encompassing inorganic and organic material analyses (0–4000 cm-1) and (B) higher resolution of the spectrum in the range for mineral analysis (400–800 cm-1) obtained by FTIR. The values obtained from FTIR analyses with respect to average Cap/Amide I ratio (C) and crystallinity (amorphous CaP to crystal ratios) (D). Values are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; *p<0.05.

Supplementary Fig. 3. Pi-induced ROS is not detrimental for osteogenic cells. (A) MTT assay results for 17IIA11 cells cultured in the growth medium containing either 5 mM Pi or 1 mM H2O2 for 24 h. Values are mean ± S.D. of three technical repeats; ***p ≤ 0.001). (B) Microscopic images of DAPI fluorescent staining and bright field images of 17IIA11 and MLO-A5 cells. Cells were maintained in growth medium (Ctrl), OM or OM+NAC medium. Scale bar = 100 μm.

RESOURCES