Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jun 1;10:8858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65649-y

Anesthetic propofol epigenetically regulates breast cancer trastuzumab resistance through IL-6/miR-149-5p axis

Dan Tian 1, Miao Tian 2, Zhi-ming Ma 3, Lei-lei Zhang 1, Yun-feng Cui 1, Jin-long Li 3,✉
PMCID: PMC7264192  PMID: 32483313

Abstract

Propofol, a common intravenous anesthetic, has been found to exert anti-cancer effects with inhibition of cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion. We tested its possible action against HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells that developed resistance against trastuzumab. Cell viability assay, ELISA for cytokines, mammosphere formation, quantitative RT-PCR for EMT/IL-6-targeting miRNAs and the in vivo experimental pulmonary metastasis model were performed to understand the epigenetic action of propofol. Propofol sensitized HER2 overexpressing cells to trastuzumab but such action was even more pronounced in resistant cells. Increased cytokines IL-6 as well as IL-8 were released by resistant cells, along with increased mammospheres and induction of EMT, all of which was inhibited by propofol. IL-6 targeting tumor suppressor miR-149-5p was found to be the novel miRNA that was up-regulated by propofol, resulting in the observed effects on cell viability, IL-6 production, mammospheres generation as well as EMT induction. Further, antagonizing miR-149-5p attenuated the propofol effects confirming the epigenetic activity of propofol through miR-149-5p regulation. Finally, in vivo validation in an experimental metastasis model conformed an inhibitory action of propofol against experimental lung metastasis and the essential mechanistic role of miR-149-5p/IL-6 loop. These results present a novel role of general anesthetic propofol against resistant breast cancer cells and the underlying epigenetic regulation of a tumor suppressor miRNA.

Subject terms: Breast cancer, Cancer microenvironment

Introduction

Propofol is a commonly used general anesthetic1. It is used for induction as well as maintenance of anesthesia. It is short acting and slows down the activity of nervous system and brain. Lately, there has been an interest in the anticancer potential of propofol2. Retrospectively, it has been suggested that the choice of anesthetic during oncological surgery can influence patient outcome3. Even though the clinical studies have provided contrary conclusions, with some supporting benefit while others finding no survival benefit associated with the use of propofol as the anesthetic of choice during cancer surgeries4–7, the in vitro data supporting a role of propofol against proliferation, invasion etc. of cancer cells is overwhelming to ignore8,9. Against breast cancer cells, propofol is particularly effective with demonstrated role in preventing proliferation10, inducing apoptosis11 and reducing metastasis12.

While there is data on anti-cancer properties of propofol in general, there is not much information on the role of propofol against the acquired resistance against therapy. Therefore, we planned this study to evaluate the ability of propofol to reverse the acquired trastuzumab resistance (Tr-R) in HER2-overexpressing cells. HER2 overexpression is known to associate with increased proliferation13 and metastases14 and given the reports on propofol against proliferation and metastasis, we thought this was an interesting topic to investigate. For our model system, we chose the HER2 overexpressing SKBR3 breast cancer cells, exposed them to trastuzumab for prolonged time to generate Tr-R SKBR3 cells and then studied the action of propofol against these cells, along with mechanistic insights. Our results showed increased production of IL-6 by Tr-R cells, which was inhibited effectively by propofol. We focused on the epigenetic mechanism of propofol action because of the recent reports highlighting such activity of propofol15. In addition to cell line-based studies, we also confirmed the mechanism in vivo in an experimental pulmonary metastasis model.

Materials and Methods

Herceptin was obtained from our hospital’s pharmacy and diluted in bacteriostatic water containing 1.1% benzyl alcohol. Propofol was purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (China) and diluted in DMSO (vehicle) as needed. MiRNA hairpin inhibitor-miR-149-5p, or the non-specific scrambled controls were purchased from Thermo Scientific (China) and transfected using siPORT™ NeoFX™ Transfection Agent (Thermo Scientific, China).

Cell culture

SKBR3 and HTB-20 cells, purchased from ATCC, are HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells used in current study. These cells were cultured in DMEM media (ThermoFisher, China), supplemented with 10% FBS, in a 5% CO2 controlled atmosphere, at 37 °C. Cells were passaged twice a week once they reached 60–80% confluency.

Cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) assay

Cell viability was studied by using cell counting kit-8 reagent, as per the provided instructions. 5000 cells were seeded overnight in a 96-well plate and treated with trastuzumab as indicated for 96 hrs (4 days). At the end of incubation period, CCK8 solution was added and incubated at 37 °C, followed by O.D. reading at 450 nm on a Shimadzu spectrophotometer.

ELISA assay

IL-6 and IL-8 were measured in cell culture supernatants by ELISA, using the kits purchased from R&D Systems (China). The 4.5 h solid phase ELISA assay was performed exactly as described by the manufacturer. 100 μl supernatant was taken and added to 100 μl of assay mixture, followed by incubation for 2 h at room temperature. After 4 washes, 200 μl of conjugate was added to each sample and incubated further for 2 h at room temperature. After 4 further washes, 200 μl of substrate solution was added followed by addition of 50 μl of stop solution. Readings were taken at 450 nm on a Shimadzu instrument and wavelength correction was set to 570 nm.

RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR

Total cellular RNA was extracted from and cells, using TRI reagent (Sigma Chemical Company, China). RNA was reverse-transcribed using the cDNA Synthesis Kit (ThermoFisher, China). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with an ABI StepOnePlus™ real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, China) using the SYBR Green mix (ThermoFisher, China). The relative gene expression was calculated using the 2−△△Ct method.

Mammospheres culture

Cells were plated in single cell suspensions on ultra-low attachment plates (Corning, China) at a density of 1000 viable cells/ml. They were cultured in mammosphere culture medium, consisting of serum-free DMEM-F12 (ThermoFisher, China), supplemented with B27 (1:50, ThermoFisher, China), 10 ng/mL EGF (BD Biosciences, China), 20 ng/mL bFGF (Sigma, China), 0.4% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, China), 4 mg/mL insulin (Sigma, China) and heparin (Sigma, China). Cultures were allowed to proceed for 3 weeks and mammospheres calculated using a bright field microscope.

In vivo mice study

We used female athymic mice (4–5 weeks old) for our study. Mice were housed under pathogen free conditions with a 12 h light/12 h dark schedule, fed autoclaved standard chow and water ad libitum. The study protocol was approved by the Jilin University Bioethical and Experimental Animal Care Committee, and all research was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines/regulations. 5 × 105 cells were injected intravenously via the tail vein and mice were euthanized exactly after 10 weeks. Lungs were examined for metastatic nodules and metastatic nodules were removed, weighed and equal amounts (by weight, 50 mg each) were digested into single cell suspensions in SKBR3 cells’ normal culture medium. The supernatant was collected and IL-6 measured by ELISA, as described above.

Statistical analysis

We used SPSS19.0 software for statistical analyses. Two-tailed Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate statistical difference between groups. p values <  0.05 were considered to be significant.

Results

Propofol affects trastuzumab sensitivity

With the goal to check the effect of propofol on trastuzumab resistance of HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells, we subjected the HER2 overexpressing SKBR3 cells to increasing doses of trastuzumab in the presence and absence of propofol. We observed that propofol increased the sensitivity of cells to trastuzumab as more cells were killed by trastuzumab in the presence of propofol (Fig. 1A). We selected the dose of propofol to be 5 μg/ml based on the published literature as well as our preliminary experiments with normal breast epithelial cells wherein this dose was non-toxic for as many as 120 hours (results not shown). Whereas the IC-50 of trastuzumab against control SKBR3 cells was 8.7 ± 0.6 μg/ml, it was decreased by propofol to be 4.6 ± 0.4 μg/ml (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Propofol affects response to trastuzumab. Parental (A) or Trastuzumab-resistant (Tr-R) (B) SKBR3 cells were treated with increasing doses of trastuzumab as indicated on X-axis in the presence of either DMSO vehicle or 5 μg/ml propofol for 96 h. Cell viability was calculated by CCK8 assay. The number of viable cells in 0 μg/ml trastuzumab treated vehicle group were regarded as 100% and the ‘relative’ percentage in other groups was calculated. #p < 0.01, compared to vehicle.

Table 1.

Trastuzumab IC-50 values of Parental and Trastuzumab-resistant SKBR3 cells in the presence and absence of Propofol.

Condition IC-50
Parental SKBR3 8.7 ± 0.6
Parental SKBR3 + Propofol 4.6 ± 0.4
Tr-R SKBR3 >20
Tr-R SKBR3 + Propofol 5.1 ± 0.4
Open in a new tab

Experiment described in Fig. 1 was used to calculate all the IC-50 values. Treatment was for a total of 96 hours. Propofol concentration was 5 μg/ml. Control cells (without propofol) were treated with equal volume of DMSO vehicle. All IC-50 values are in the units of μg/ml. Tr-R SKBR3: Trastuzumab resistant SKBR3 cells. >20: IC-50 could not be achieved at the highest concentration of 20 μg/ml Trastuzumab tested.

We then treated SKBR3 cells with escalating doses of trastuzumab for 3 months to generate trastuzumab-resistant (Tr-R) cells and repeated the same experiment as above. First, we noted increased resistance of these cells to trastuzumab (Fig. 1B). Moreover, we found that these cells were also sensitized by propofol to trastuzumab. The IC-50 values provided in Table 1 further support the observations. Whereas IC-50 was not achieved in Tr-R cells at the highest dose tested (20 μg/ml), propofol significantly brought it down to 5.1 ± 0.4 μg/ml.

Propofol reduces trastuzumab resistance-associated increase in cytokine

Since propofol inhibits the release of cytokines IL-6 and IL-816 and these cytokines play a role in resistance to trastuzumab17, we checked for the release of these cytokines by HER2 overexpressing cells. As seen in Fig. 2, both of these cytokines were released in significantly large quantities by Tr-R cells, as compared to the parental HER2 overexpressing SKBR3 cells. Further, propofol significantly (p < 0.05) decreased their release in parental cells, but even more (p < 0.01) in the Tr-R cells. To rule-out any potential cell line-specific effects, we tested another cell line (HTB-20) as well. Similar to SKBR3 cells, HTB-20 cells were also treated with escalating doses of trastuzumab for 3 months to generate trastuzumab-resistant (Tr-R) cells. We observed similar trends as SKBR3 cells as propofol significantly inhibited the release of cytokines even though the basal levels were lower compared to SKBR3 cells. In HTB-20 cells as well, propofol inhibited cytokine release from resistant cells more than the parental cells (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Propofol affects cytokine production. Parental or Trastuzumab-resistant (Tr-R) SKBR3 cells or HTB-20 cells were treated with either DMSO vehicle or 5 μg/ml propofol for 96 h. Cell culture supernatant was collected and ELISA was performed to quantitate levels of IL-6 or IL-8. *p < 0.05 and #p < 0.01, compared to vehicle.

Mechanism of propofol action

In view of the significant release of IL-6 by Tr-R cells as shown in preceding results, we focused on epigenetic basis of such release. Of note, trastuzumab resistance is controlled by epigenetic mechanisms18 and, moreover, such epigenetic action of propofol has been reported before15. We turned to Targetscan (www.targetscan.org) to list the miRNAs that can regulate IL-6, and evaluated the top two such miRNAs – miR-149-5p and miR-760. The results obtained with both of these miRNAs are presented in Fig. 3. Since these miRNAs target IL-6, they are tumor suppressors and therefore down-regulated in Tr-R cells, compared to control cells. Propofol significantly up-regulated miR-149-5p in both parental as well as Tr-R cells, with the effect being more significant in the resistant cells (p < 0.01). A similar trend was observed for miR-760 as well, however, only the effect in resistant SKBR3 as well as HTB-20 cells, and not the parental cells, was found to be significant for this miRNA (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Propofol affects miR-149-5p, miR-760, mammospheres and EMT. Parental or Trastuzumab-resistant (Tr-R) SKBR3 or HTB-20 cells were treated with either DMSO vehicle or 5 μg/ml propofol for 96 h. Total mRNA was then collected from the cells and miR-149-5p/miR-760 quantitated by quantitative RT-PCR. U6 was used as an internal control for miRNA expression. Mammospheres generated, as described in Methods, were counted under different experimental conditions and levels of EMT marker, snail, quantitated by quantitative RT-PCR. For mRNAs’ internal control and normalization, we used gene expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). *p < 0.05 and #p < 0.01, compared to vehicle.

Both cancer stem cells and the phenomenon of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) influence therapy resistance. Therefore, we next checked for these in our cell models. SKBR3 and HTB-20 cells were grown to generate mammospheres and we found that more mammospheres were formed by Tr-R cells, relative to parental cells (Fig. 3), supporting a role of cancer stem cells in trastuzumab resistance. Propofol reduced mammospheres formed by parental cells as well as the Tr-R cells. As an EMT marker, we checked for the expression of snail and found it elevated in Tr-R cells, relative to parental cells. Similar to the effect of propofol on mammospheres, it reduced the level of EMT marker snail in parental cells, but even more in the Tr-R cells (Fig. 3).

Inhibition of miR-149-5p attenuates propofol effects

With the observed up-regulation of miR-149-5p by propofol, which could explain the inhibitory action of propofol on IL-6 production, we next checked if countering such up-regulation of miRNA could attenuate propofol effects. We tested this by transfecting anti-miR-149-5p in Tr-R SKBR3 cells and subjecting them to cell viability assay. We observed that the sensitization of Tr-R cells to trastuzumab by propofol was significantly attenuated by the anti-miR-149-5p (p < 0.01) (Fig. 4A). This also resulted in similar effect on IL-6 release by the Tr-R SKBR3 cells (Fig. 4B) and Tr-R HTB-20 cells (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Inhibiting miR-149-5p attenuates propofol effects. (A) Trastuzumab-resistant SKBR3 cells were treated with increasing doses of trastuzumab as indicated on X-axis in the presence of either DMSO vehicle or 5 μg/ml propofol for 96 h. Additionally, Trastuzumab-resistant cells transfected with anti-miR-149-5p oligos (Anti-miR) were also evaluated. Cell viability was calculated by CCK8 assay. The number of viable cells in 0 μg/ml trastuzumab treated vehicle group were regarded as 100% and the ‘relative’ percentage in other groups was calculated. Trastuzumab-resistant (Tr-R) (B) SKBR3 or (C) HTB-20 cells were treated with either DMSO vehicle or 5 μg/ml propofol for 96 h. Additionally, Trastuzumab-resistant cells transfected with anti-miR-149-5p oligos (Anti-miR) were also evaluated. Cell culture supernatant was collected and ELISA was performed to quantitate levels of IL-6. #p < 0.01, compared to vehicle and $p < 0.01, compared to propofol alone.

In vivo validation

Finally, we took our studies to an in vivo model to validate the in vitro findings. For this, we turned to an experimental metastasis assay. Parental as well as Tr-R cells (with or without anti-miR-149-5p transfections) were injected into mice and the resulting lung metastases counted. While an effect of propofol on lung mets in parental cells was observed (Fig. 5A), the effect was much more pronounced in the Tr-R cells (p < 0.01) which, to start with, had much more metastases than the parental cells. Transfections with anti-miR-149-5p significantly (p < 0.01) attenuated the ability of propofol to inhibit lung mets. When these lung metastatic nodules were further cultured, the release of IL-6 in the culture supernatant was found to be inhibited by propofol, as expected, only to be attenuated by anti-miR-149-5p (Fig. 5B), this validating the in vitro findings.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

In vivo study. (A) Parental or trastuzumab-resistant (Tr-R) SKBR3 cells were injected intra-venously in athymic mice, as described in Methods. The propofol treated mice were in two different groups – either injected with cells that were transfected with non-scrambled control (propofol) or injected with cells transfected with anti-miR-149-5p oligos (propofol + Anti-miR). Lung metastatic nodules (Lung Mets) were counted in all animals (n = 8 each in each group). (B) The extracted modules were weighed and exactly equal amounts (50 mg) were subjected to RNA isolation and subsequent culture in culture dishes. Cell culture supernatant was collected and ELISA was performed to quantitate levels of IL-6. #p < 0.01, compared to vehicle and $p < 0.01, compared to propofol alone.

Discussion

Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting Chinese women19. The incidence rate for breast cancer has increased over the last decade without the corresponding increase in mortality because of early diagnosis20. However, the number of women succumbing to this disease is still high, thus calling for further research. Among the many breast cancer subtypes, the HER2 overexpressing breast cancers are very aggressive with increased chances of metastatic disease14. Trastuzumab is used to treat HER2 overexpressing breast cancers but acquired resistance against trastuzumab is a clinical reality18. In the present study, we generated trastuzumab resistant cells by continuous and prolonged exposure of HER2 overexpressing cells to trastuzumab, and then evaluating the cytokine expression and the underlying epigenetic regulation.

We observed increased release of IL-6 by Tr-R cells. This is in agreement with the basic conclusion of an earlier report where an antibody against IL-6 was shown to sensitize trastuzumab-resistant tumors21. Thus, IL-6 seems to be an attractive target for therapy to cure trastuzumab-resistant breast cancers. One of the mechanism by which resistance against trastuzumab is induced by IL-6 is through the induction of EMT22. We also confirmed this phenomenon as Tr-R cells had higher levels of snail, a biomarker for EMT. The major objective of our study was to study the effects of anesthetic propofol against Tr-R cells and since IL-6 and EMT are mechanistically involved in the process, we found an inhibitory effect of propofol against both IL-6 as well as snail expression. Further, EMT and cancer stem cells are closely related and we not only found increased generation of mammospheres by Tr-r cells, but also their marked inhibition by propofol, which is in agreement with a previously published report23. Ironically, propofol can have both pro- as well as anti-tumor effects3, but our study supports a action of propofol against Tr-r cells, which is supportive of an anti-tumor effect.

Trastuzumab resistance can have epigenetic origin18. We, therefore focused on epigenetic basis of trastuzumab resistance, particularly on the epigenetic basis of IL-6 release. Bioinformatic analysis confirmed miR-149-5p and miR-760 as the two top miRNAs that regulate IL-6 expression. Interestingly, propofol increased the expression of these two tumor suppressor miRNAs, which could then inhibit their target IL-6 and thus sensitize trastuzumab resistance. These findings support an important epigenetic activity of propofol within the tumor microenvironment that can profoundly affect the drug resistance and overall outcome. While our study is the first to describe affect of propofol on miRNA leading to impact on cancer drug resistance, there are reports on affects of propofol on miRNAs but in the context of different outcomes. In particular, similar to our findings regarding the up-regulation of tumor suppressor miRNAs, miR-149-5p and miR-760, propofol has been reported to upregulate other tumor suppressor miRNAs, such as, miR-133a24, miR-199a25, miR-32826, miR-128427 etc. our study is novel not just in the context of trastuzumab resistance but with regards to up-regulation of tumor suppressor in breast cancer in general.

In view of the anticancer effects of propofol described by us here, it is possible that the use of this anesthetic during the breast cancer resection surgery might be beneficial. This was tested and the results reported recently4. The work comprised of a large cohort of breast cancer patients who had surgery between 2006 and 2010 and then followed-up until 2016. Even after all exclusions, 592 patients receiving desflurane were compared with 296 patients receiving propofol. The major conclusion of the study was the inability to find any survival benefit with the use of either anesthesia. Of note, there was a small difference in the distant metastases as the patients receiving propofol had fewer (6%) distant metastases, compared to patients receiving desflurane (8%). These numbers are quite close to those reported in another work28. Even though the numbers in Huang study4 did not receive statistical significance, the trend seems to suggest a possible protecting role of propofol against distant metastases. This also supports our own observations regarding the effect of propofol on lung metastasis in an experimental metastasis model. It is possible that the follow-up in Huang study4 was not adequate and an even longer follow-up time would have generated statistically significant results. Such studies are difficult to control for and subtle changes in the patients TNM stage etc. can influence the outcome. A few other reports29,30 support the contention that propofol use might not alter the cancer outcome. Even a randomized controlled trial involving 13 hospitals across multiple countries in Argentina, Austria, China, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore and the USA, that enrolled patients from 2007 through 2018 reached the same conclusion regarding no particular advantage of using one anesthetic procedure over another7.

Supporting a protective role of propofol is an earlier study by Lee et al.6 which evaluated overall survival in 173 patients who received propofol vs. 152 patients who received sevoflurane during modified radical mastectomy. In this study, the propofol receiving patients had lower rate of cancer recurrence. Also, a study with colon cancer patients5 that compared propofol vs. desflurane, similar to breast cancer study above4, reported a clear benefit of using propofol as the overall survival was clearly better in patients in propofol group. Thus, the benefits of propofol might not be confined to breast cancer, but might be even enhanced in patients with other cancers. Interestingly, intravenous anesthetics such as propofol might be better than the inhaled anesthetics as the pulmonary complications have been reported to be higher in inhalation based anesthesia, compared to intravenously administered anesthesia31. This systemic review further supports our results from the experimental pulmonary metastasis assay.

In summary, we provide first evidence supporting a possible use of anesthetic propofol against resistant breast cancer cells. Our in vitro as well as in vivo results are supportive of the hypothesis that propofol can epigenetically sensitize trastuzumab breast cancers. Future clinical studies are needed to further explore and evaluate this idea.

Author contributions

J.-L.L. conceptualized and supervised the project; D.T., M.T., Z.-M.M. performed experiments and interpreted data; L.-L.Z., Y.-F.C. interpreted data and ran statistical analyses; D.T., M.T., J.-L.L. wrote manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Miner JR, Burton JH. Clinical practice advisory: Emergency department procedural sedation with propofol. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2007;50(182–187):187 e181. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang J, et al. Novel Findings of Anti-cancer Property of Propofol. Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2018;18:156–165. doi: 10.2174/1871520617666170912120327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li R, Liu H, Dilger JP, Lin J. Effect of Propofol on breast Cancer cell, the immune system, and patient outcome. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18:77. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0543-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huang YH, et al. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia did not improve survival compared to desflurane anesthesia in breast cancer surgery. Plos one. 2019;14:e0224728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wu ZF, et al. Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Is Associated with Better Survival Than Desflurane Anesthesia in Colon Cancer Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2018;129:932–941. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee JH, Kang SH, Kim Y, Kim HA, Kim BS. Effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on recurrence and overall survival in patients after modified radical mastectomy: a retrospective study. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 2016;69:126–132. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.2.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sessler DI, et al. Recurrence of breast cancer after regional or general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:1807–1815. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32313-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang ZT, Gong HY, Zheng F, Liu DJ, Yue XQ. Propofol suppresses proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer cells via downregulation of microRNA-221 expression. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015;14:8117–8124. doi: 10.4238/2015.July.17.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang L, et al. Propofol induces proliferation and invasion of gallbladder cancer cells through activation of Nrf2. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;31:66. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-31-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Du Q, et al. Propofol inhibits proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of MCF-7 cells by suppressing miR-21 expression. Artificial cells. nanomedicine, Biotechnol. 2019;47:1265–1271. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1594000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yu B, et al. Propofol induces apoptosis of breast cancer cells by downregulation of miR-24 signal pathway. Cancer biomarkers: Sect. A Dis. markers. 2018;21:513–519. doi: 10.3233/cbm-170234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Freeman James, Crowley Peter D., Foley Andrew G., Gallagher Helen C., Iwasaki Masae, Ma Daqing, Buggy Donal J. Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine, Propofol and Steroids on Pulmonary Metastasis in a Murine Model of Breast Cancer Surgery. Cancers. 2019;11(5):613. doi: 10.3390/cancers11050613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Eladdadi A, Isaacson D. A mathematical model for the effects of HER2 overexpression on cell proliferation in breast cancer. Bull. Math. Biol. 2008;70:1707–1729. doi: 10.1007/s11538-008-9315-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Labidi S, et al. Targeted Therapies in HER2-Overexpressing Metastatic Breast Cancer. Breast Care. 2016;11:418–422. doi: 10.1159/000452194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gao, X. et al. The mechanism of propofol in cancer development: An updated review. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 10.1111/ajco.13301 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Jia J, Sun Y, Hu Z, Li Y, Ruan X. Propofol inhibits the release of interleukin-6, 8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha correlating with high-mobility group box 1 expression in lipopolysaccharides-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:148. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0441-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Korkaya H, et al. Activation of an IL6 inflammatory loop mediates trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer by expanding the cancer stem cell population. Mol. Cell. 2012;47:570–584. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ahmad A. Current Updates on Trastuzumab Resistance in HER2 Overexpressing Breast Cancers. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019;1152:217–228. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fan L, et al. Breast cancer in China. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e279–289. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70567-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ahmad A. Breast Cancer Statistics: Recent Trends. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019;1152:1–7. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhong H, et al. A Novel IL6 Antibody Sensitizes Multiple Tumor Types to Chemotherapy Including Trastuzumab-Resistant Tumors. Cancer Res. 2016;76:480–490. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Burnett JP, et al. Trastuzumab resistance induces EMT to transform HER2(+) PTEN(−) to a triple negative breast cancer that requires unique treatment options. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:15821. doi: 10.1038/srep15821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang X, et al. Propofol Reduced Mammosphere Formation of Breast Cancer Stem Cells via PD-L1/Nanog In Vitro. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019;2019:9078209. doi: 10.1155/2019/9078209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang ZT, Gong HY, Zheng F, Liu DJ, Dong TL. Propofol suppresses proliferation and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells by upregulating microRNA-133a expression. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015;14:7529–7537. doi: 10.4238/2015.July.3.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang J, Zhang D, Wu GQ, Feng ZY, Zhu SM. Propofol inhibits the adhesion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by upregulating microRNA-199a and downregulating MMP-9 expression. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2013;12:305–309. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60048-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yu X, Gao Y, Zhang F. Propofol inhibits pancreatic cancer proliferation and metastasis by up-regulating miR-328 and down-regulating ADAM8. Basic. Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2019;125:271–278. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu WZ, Liu N. Propofol Inhibits Lung Cancer A549 Cell Growth and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Process by Upregulation of MicroRNA-1284. Oncol. Res. 2018;27:1–8. doi: 10.3727/096504018X15172738893959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 28.Wigmore TJ, Mohammed K, Jhanji S. Long-term Survival for Patients Undergoing Volatile versus IV Anesthesia for Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2016;124:69–79. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kim MH, et al. Does the type of anesthesia really affect the recurrence-free survival after breast cancer surgery? Oncotarget. 2017;8:90477–90487. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yoo S, et al. Total Intravenous Anesthesia versus Inhalation Anesthesia for Breast Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:31–40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Soltanizadeh S, Degett TH, Gogenur I. Outcomes of cancer surgery after inhalational and intravenous anesthesia: A systematic review. J. Clin. Anesth. 2017;42:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES