Skip to main content
Translational Psychiatry logoLink to Translational Psychiatry
. 2020 May 27;10:166. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-0845-3

Effects of early life exposure to traffic-related air pollution on brain development in juvenile Sprague-Dawley rats

Kelley T Patten 1, Eduardo A González 1, Anthony Valenzuela 1, Elizabeth Berg 2, Christopher Wallis 3, Joel R Garbow 4, Jill L Silverman 2,5, Keith J Bein 3,6, Anthony S Wexler 3,7, Pamela J Lein 1,5,
PMCID: PMC7264203  PMID: 32483143

Abstract

Epidemiological studies link traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) to increased risk for various neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs); however, there are limited preclinical data demonstrating a causal relationship between TRAP and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. Moreover, much of the preclinical literature reports effects of concentrated ambient particles or diesel exhaust that do not recapitulate the complexity of real-world TRAP exposures. To assess the developmental neurotoxicity of more realistic TRAP exposures, we exposed male and female rats during gestation and early postnatal development to TRAP drawn directly from a traffic tunnel in Northern California and delivered to animals in real-time. We compared NDD-relevant neuropathological outcomes at postnatal days 51–55 in TRAP-exposed animals versus control subjects exposed to filtered air. As indicated by immunohistochemical analyses, TRAP significantly increased microglial infiltration in the CA1 hippocampus, but decreased astrogliosis in the dentate gyrus. TRAP exposure had no persistent effect on pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in the male or female brain, but did significantly elevate the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in females. In male rats, TRAP significantly increased hippocampal neurogenesis, while in females, TRAP increased granule cell layer width. TRAP had no effect on apoptosis in either sex. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed that TRAP-exposed females, but not males, also exhibited decreased lateral ventricular volume, which was correlated with increased granule cell layer width in the hippocampus in females. Collectively, these data indicate that exposure to real-world levels of TRAP during gestation and early postnatal development modulate neurodevelopment, corroborating epidemiological evidence of an association between TRAP exposure and increased risk of NDDs.

Subject terms: Molecular neuroscience, Pathogenesis

Introduction

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are a heterogeneous group of conditions characterized by altered brain development1,2. NDDs exact a significant toll on individuals, families, and society3. There is, therefore, considerable interest in identifying risk factors with the goal of modifying these to decrease the incidence and/or severity of NDDs. There is now credible evidence that environmental factors influence individual risk for NDDs4,5. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) and/or proximity to roadways during development represent environmental factors that have been associated with increased NDD risk610. TRAP has also been linked to NDD-relevant symptoms, such as cognitive impairment11,12, psychomotor deficits13,14, and hyperactivity15. While these associations have been reported for multiple cohorts in differing locations and across varying exposure levels, they have yet to be confirmed in an experimental model that reproduces the heterogeneous and dynamic nature of real-world TRAP to which humans are exposed.

The respirable fraction of near-roadway air pollution is primarily composed of vehicular emissions, which are complex mixtures of volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and ultrafine particles comprising metals, semi-volatile and nonvolatile organic compounds, and black/elemental carbon16,17. Exposure to selected TRAP components has been shown to cause various NDD-relevant outcomes in rodent models. Exposing mice to fine or ultrafine particulate matter (PM) during development increases neuroinflammatory cytokines and astrocyte activation18,19, alters microglia morphology20 and neurotransmitter levels18, and increases oligodendrogenesis21 and lateral ventricle size18. Developmental exposure of mice to diesel exhaust alters cortical volume20, disrupts cortical organization22, and impairs neurogenesis23,24.

Most animal studies published to date, however, have employed exposure paradigms that do not capture the complexity or spatiotemporal dynamics of real-world TRAP exposures. Since composition, dose, and timing of air pollution exposures may influence biological outcomes2527, translating the relevance of much of the published animal literature to the human condition is problematic. To better represent human TRAP exposures in an animal model, we developed an exposure paradigm that preserves the gaseous and particulate components of real-world TRAP and captures daily fluctuations in pollutant levels. To accomplish this, we exposed male and female Sprague-Dawley rats from approximately gestational day (GD) 14 through postnatal day (PND) 47–51 to TRAP drawn directly from a freeway tunnel system28,29 and delivered unchanged to an exposure chamber in real-time. Age- and sex-matched littermate controls housed in the same facility were exposed to filtered air (FA). This paper compares neuropathologic outcomes of relevance to NDDs in TRAP vs. FA subjects. Companion papers compare effects of TRAP exposure and transportation stress on behavioral outcomes30 and describe the properties of the tunnel air pollutants (Bein, unpublished data).

Methods

Detailed methods are provided in supplemental materials.

Exposure Facility

We constructed a TRAP exposure facility adjacent to a major freeway tunnel system in the Bay Area of Northern California (Bein, unpublished data). Briefly, air drawn from above the eastbound exit of tunnel bore 1, containing both light and heavy-duty vehicle traffic, was delivered to airtight exposure chambers housed inside the facility vivarium. Supply air for separate but identical FA exposure chambers housed in the same vivarium was drawn from ambient air surrounding the facility and subjected to a series of emissions control technologies prior to being delivered to the animals. This facility was inspected and approved by the UC Davis Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Animals

Animal procedures were conducted in strict compliance with IACUC-approved protocols, with careful regard for alleviation of pain and suffering. Animals were housed in controlled environmental conditions (20–26 °C; 12:12 light-dark cycle) with food and water provided ad libitum. Details of animal husbandry, pup development, and behavioral testing are described in a companion paper30. Briefly, pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were transported to the exposure facility at GD 14 and randomly assigned to either FA or TRAP groups. Neither birth outcomes nor pup development were significantly different between FA- and TRAP-exposed animals. Shortly after birth, pups were randomly assigned to a cohort that underwent behavioral testing (n = 15 per group) or a cohort that did not (n = 6 per group, hereafter referred to as “untested”). Sample sizes were determined based on power analysis of previous data. Litter effects were carefully controlled in both cohorts. Pups were weaned at PND 21, and separately housed by sex for the remainder of the study. At approximately PND 50, animals were transported back to the UC Davis campus. After 18 h recovery, behaviorally tested animals were imaged by MR, while untested animals were euthanized as previously described31. Briefly, whole blood was collected via cardiac puncture, animals were transcardially perfused, and left and right brain hemispheres were collected for cytokine analyses and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Plasma was collected from whole blood and stored at −80 °C.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

MRI experiments were performed on PND 53–55 behaviorally tested rats at the UC Davis Center for Molecular and Genomic Imaging (CMGI) using a Bruker Biospec 70/30 (7T) small-animal scanner (Bruker BioSpin MRI). Volumes of the whole brain and lateral ventricles were compared between experimental groups.

Immunohistochemistry

Briefly, 10 μm thick brain sections were immunostained using the following primary antibodies: ionized binding adaptor molecule 1 (IBA1, catalog #19-19741, Wako; 1:1000), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, #3670 S, Cell Signaling; 1:1000), s100β (#ab52642, Abcam; 1:500), neuronal nuclei (NeuN, #MAB377, Millipore; 1:500), doublecortin (DCX, #MAB2253, Millipore; 1:500) and Ki67 (#ab15580, Abcam; 1:750). Fluorescent images were acquired at 20x on an ImageExpress MicroXL High-Content Analysis System (Molecular Devices). Fluorescence that is twice the background in negative control samples was considered positive staining. Overlapping tiles were stitched together to create final images for each hippocampal subregion (dentate gyrus, CA1, CA3). Images were analyzed using ImageJ v1.52p (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/; NIH). Reactive astrogliosis and immature neurons were quantified as the percent area within each brain region immunopositive for GFAP or DCX, respectively. Microglial cell infiltration and neurogenesis were assessed as the percentage of total cells identified by DAPI staining that were immunopositive for IBA1- or Ki67/DCX, respectively. Granule cell layer width was measured as previously described32. All image acquisition and analyses were performed by an investigator blinded to experimental group and sex.

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-X nick end labeling (TUNEL)

Apoptosis was quantified by TUNEL staining per the manufacturer’s instructions (kit #11684795910, Roche) with the following modifications: (1) DNase (1000 U/ml, Promega) diluted in DNase buffer supplied by the manufacturer was applied directly to slides; (2) sections were incubated in a solution of 30 nM DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in PBS for 5 min prior to mounting in Prolong Gold (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Frozen hippocampal tissue was homogenized with a hand-held homogenizer (UX-44468-25, Cole-Parmer) for 15 s and total RNA was isolated from the homogenate using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was performed as previously described33. Primers obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies were designed to span exon-exon junctions using Primer-BLAST. Primer sequences and efficiencies are shown in Supplemental Table 1.

Tissue cytokine and chemokine levels

Hippocampal cytokines were quantified using a Bio-Plex ProTM 23-plex cytokine/chemokines assay (BioRad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the following modifications: ~300 mg of frozen hippocampal tissue was homogenized in cell lysis buffer (BioRad) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich) diluted 1:25 in water. Samples run in duplicate at 1000 µg/ml were measured using a LuminexTM 100 suspension array system (Bio-Plex 200, Bio-Rad). Analyte concentrations were calculated using a standard curve derived from reference cytokines, and the geometric means were compared for each group.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism statistical software, version 7.03 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Our primary goal was to determine the effect(s) of TRAP exposure on relevant neuropathological outcomes. However, to account for the possible influence of sex on these outcomes, we performed two-way ANOVAs to determine if sex, or the interaction of sex with exposure, affected outcomes. If there was a significant main effect of sex, or an interaction between sex and exposure, then post hoc analyses were performed on males and females separately. Post hoc tests included two-sided Student’s t test, or Sidak’s test with correction for multiple comparisons if there was an interaction between sex and exposure. Pair-wise comparisons were performed between groups with similar variance. If two-way ANOVA determined that sex did not affect endpoints, then male and female data were collapsed by exposure, and collapsed data are represented graphically. Correlations between neurogenic markers and lateral ventricle size were analyzed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Data are presented as mean ± SD, unless otherwise noted. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to TRAP or FA for 24 h/d from GD 14 to PND 47–51 (Fig. 1). PM2.5 and total suspended particles (TSPs) were measured and averaged across 8 days within the study period. Mean PM2.5 levels in FA were 3.74 μg/m3 ± 1.21 compared to 13.94 μg/m3 ± 12.86 in TRAP. Mean TSP levels in FA were 4.18 μg/m3 ± 1.18 compared to 23.58 μg/m3 ± 21.48 in TRAP (Fig. 1b). More detailed descriptions of TRAP and FA PM2.5 composition are provided in the Supplemental Information. Briefly, elemental, organic, and total carbon levels were significantly increased in TRAP compared to FA (Supplemental Fig. 1), and traffic-related metals comprised a larger percentage of PM2.5 in TRAP than in FA (Supplemental Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. Experimental design.

Fig. 1

a The exposure facility consisted of a vivarium, where animals were housed in FA or TRAP exposure chambers, and a behavioral testing suite. TRAP drawn from a freeway tunnel system in Northern California was delivered unchanged to the exposure chamber. FA exposures were created by sequentially filtering ambient air adjacent to the vivarium to remove volatile and semi-volatile components, NOx, and ultrafine and fine particulate matter. b PM2.5 and total suspended particulates (TSP) in TRAP vs. FA shown as the mean ± SD (n = 8). c Pregnant dams were transported to the facility at gestational day 14; pups were born in the facility and remained there until PND 47–51. Pups were divided into two cohorts: one that was not used for behavioral studies (yellow bar) and another that was behaviorally tested and imaged by MR (green bar).

TRAP modulates the cellular neuroinflammatory response in the hippocampus

To determine whether TRAP triggers neuroinflammation, we first measured the percentage of cells immunopositive for IBA1, a biomarker of microglia34, in the CA1, CA3 and dentate gyrus (DG) subregions of the hippocampus in PND 51–55 rats (Fig. 2). Sex did not significantly affect the outcome in any hippocampal region (CA1: F (1,19) = 1.717, p = 0.514; DG: F (1,19) = 0.006, p = 0.938; CA3: F (1,20) = 0.3438, p = 0.564); therefore, male and female data were collapsed within exposure groups. Post hoc analysis showed that TRAP significantly increased the percentage of IBA1+ cells in the CA1 region (Fig. 2a, b) (Student’s t test, p = 0.022), suggesting TRAP induced microgliosis in this subregion. TRAP did not alter the percentage of IBA1+ cells in the DG (Fig. 2b, Student’s t test, p = 0.682) or the CA3 (Fig. 2b, Student’s t test, p = 0.427).

Fig. 2. TRAP alters microglial infiltration and astrocyte reactivity at PND 51–55.

Fig. 2

a Representative photomicrographs of IBA1 immunoreactivity (red) in the CA1 hippocampus of FA vs. TRAP females. Sections were counterstained with DAPI (blue) to identify cell nuclei. Bar = 100 µm. Arrowheads indicate IBA1+ cells. b Quantification of microglial infiltration in hippocampal subregions, indicated as percentage of IBA1+ cells. c Representative images of GFAP (red) and s100β (green) immunoreactivity in the dentate gyrus of FA vs. TRAP females. Bar = 100 µm. Astrogliosis was quantified as the percentage area immunopositive for GFAP (d) or s100β (e). Data from male and female animals are combined and presented as the mean ± SD (n = 10–12 animals/exposure). Circles represent an individual animal (average of four brain slices per animal); white = FA; gray = TRAP. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01 (Student’s t test).

Astrocytes also contribute to neuroinflammatory responses35, therefore, we next measured immunoreactivity for the astrocyte-specific biomarkers, GFAP and S100β36. Analyses by 2-way ANOVA indicated that sex did not have a significant effect (F (1,20) = 1.557, p = 0.227), so male and female data were collapsed within exposure groups. We observed a significant (~22%) decrease in the area of GFAP immunoreactivity in the DG of TRAP subjects (Fig. 2c, d, Student’s t test, p = 0.0044). In contrast, TRAP had no significant effect on S100β immunoreactivity in the same brain region (Fig. 2e, Student’s t test, p = 0.058). Within the CA1 and CA3, TRAP had no significant effect on GFAP (Fig. 2d, CA1 p = 0.690; CA3 p = 0.394) or S100β (Fig. 3e, CA1 p = 0.110; CA3 p = 0.492) immunoreactivity.

Fig. 3. TRAP alters neurogenesis in a sex-dependent manner.

Fig. 3

a Representative images of the dentate gyrus from PND 51–55 males immunostained for DCX (red) to label immature neurons; Ki67 (green), proliferating cells; NeuN (cyan), mature neurons. Bar = 100 µm. Arrowheads identify cells double-labeled for Ki67/DCX; insets are of the field outlined in the white box. b Quantification of immature neurons measured as percent area of the SGZ and GCL immunopositive for DCX. c Quantification of cycling immature neurons measured as the percentage of total cells in the SGZ that were Ki67+/DCX+. d GCL width measured as band of NeuN immunoreactivity. e Representative images of TUNEL staining (green) to identify apoptotic cells; sections were counterstained for DAPI (blue) to label cell nuclei. DNase I was used as a positive control. f Quantification of TUNEL staining. g Fold-change in expression of Sox2, Igf2, and Igf1 in the hippocampus at PND 51–55 rats, normalized to the geometric mean of Gapdh and Ppia. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 5–6 animals/group). For immunohistochemistry, four sections were analyzed per animal; for qPCR, two replicates/animal. Each circle represents the mean for one animal; white = FA; gray = TRAP. *p < 0.05 (Sidak’s test for immunohistochemical data; Mann–Whitney test for qPCR data).

TRAP increases hippocampal IL-10 levels in females

Microglia and astrocytes influence neurodevelopment via the release of soluble signaling molecules, such as cytokines and chemokines, which may have pro- or anti-inflammatory effects, and growth factors34. Therefore, we next measured selected cytokine, chemokine, and growth factors in hippocampal tissue from PND 51–55 subjects using a Bio-Plex ProTM assay that quantifies protein levels of 23 analytes (Table 1). We observed sex-specific differences in the expression of several cytokines; however, only one factor, IL-10, was significantly altered by TRAP. As identified by 2-way ANOVA, there was a significant effect of sex on interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels (F (1,18) = 11.36, p = 0.003), with decreased IL-6 in males relative to females. However, TRAP did not affect IL-6 in male or females. A similar pattern was observed for growth factor granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF): 2-way ANOVA showed a significant effect of sex (F (1,18) = 8.859, p = 0.008), with males having significantly lower levels of G-CSF than females. However, TRAP exposure did not modify G-CSF in either sex. For interleukin-10 (IL-10), we observed a significant interaction between sex and exposure (F (1,18) = 5.963, p = 0.0252). Post hoc analyses showed that TRAP females had significantly higher levels of IL-10 than FA females (Sidak’s test; p = 0.014), but IL-10 levels in males were not affected by TRAP (Sidak’s test; p = 0.417). Analysis by 2-way ANOVA also identified a significant interaction between sex and exposure for the chemokine C-C motif 2 (CCL2) (F (1,18) = 4.568, p = 0.0466); however, Sidak’s test post hoc analyses did not reveal significant effects between groups. The remaining cytokines included in the assay (Table 1) were not significantly altered by exposure or sex.

Table 1.

Protein levels of cytokine, chemokine, and growth factors in the hippocampus at PND 51–55.

Female (pg/ml ± s.d.) Male (pg/ml ± s.d.)
Analyte Filtered Air TRAP Filtered Air TRAP Result
IL-1β 24.07 ± 5.94 30.02 ± 6.14 26.54 ± 8.40 23.33 ± 5.94 n.s.
IL-18 260.29 ± 13.81 301.76 ± 27.03 288.49 ± 87.90 260.58 ± 30.58 n.s.
IL-1ɑ 48.40 ± 8.20 51.93 ± 8.12 47.96 ± 5.85 44.82 ± 1.83 n.s.
TNFɑ 607.67 ± 123.70 665.84 ± 64.74 788.43 ± 742.93 616.39 ± 162.69 n.s.
IL-6 1396.57 ± 124.81 1496.70 ± 113.50 1329.15 ± 65.24 1280.32 ± 72.62 p = 0.003; Female > Male
IL-12 (p70) 541.97 ± 88.58 605.44 ± 79.65 564.53 ± 47.95 536.06 ± 40.39 n.s.
IL-17 116.80 ± 17.78 129.70 ± 12.87 120.68 ± 7.55 114.14 ± 5.02 n.s.
IL-7 196.07 ± 8.90 217.92 ± 21.67 195.50 ± 27.22 189.73 ± 32.60 n.s.
IL-2 1742.63 ± 229.40 1746.21 ± 255.39 1894.78 ± 508.37 1685.35 ± 473.38 n.s.
IFNɣ 8673.11 ± 1537.55 10204.31 ± 1875.28 9059.99 ± 1182.41 8243.57 ± 771.17 n.s.
IL-4 54.55 ± 7.35 59.55 ± 7.45 54.37 ± 6.19 53.99 ± 6.55 n.s.
IL-5 167.70 ± 17.42 180.06 ± 17.72 171.23 ± 9.62 163.38 ± 5.10 n.s.
IL-10 408.32 ± 70.37 494.47 ± 29.87 419.98 ± 46.49 382.89 ± 36.07 p = 0.014; TRAP Female > FA Female
IL-13 172.12 ± 26.80 190.18 ± 32.09 178.58 ± 21.29 166.68 ± 22.92 n.s.
G-CSF 22.38 ± 3.71 26.56 ± 2.87 20.77 ± 2.46 20.90 ± 2.16 p = 0.008; Female > Male
GM-CSF 141.74 ± 7.85 153.83 ± 14.97 138.42 ± 8.88 136.08 ± 15.87 n.s.
M-CSF 11.23 ± 2.03 12.78 ± 2.30 11.76 ± 1.65 10.61 ± 0.58 n.s.
CXCL1 55.27 ± 7.42 60.91 ± 6.42 59.48 ± 3.53 53.71 ± 2.97 n.s.
CCL3 20.36 ± 4.07 22.11 ± 3.06 21.01 ± 2.19 18.98 ± 1.05 n.s.
CCL20 9.28 ± 1.48 10.33 ± 1.30 9.31 ± 0.79 8.92 ± 0.62 n.s.
CCL5 59.28 ± 7.69 64.36 ± 6.69 62.81 ± 5.06 58.89 ± 3.47 n.s.
CCL2 153.58 ± 12.61 165.91 ± 13.02 159.85 ± 17.56 145.18 ± 16.19 p = 0.046; interaction sex and exposure
VEGF 316.99 ± 51.37 341.82 ± 40.88 333.32 ± 25.45 310.21 ± 20.51 n.s.

Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 5–6 animals/group with two technical replicates/animal). Significant main effects of sex, exposure, or interactions between sex and exposure were determined by two-way ANOVA with post hoc Sidak’s test.

TRAP exposure increases hippocampal neurogenesis in male rats and granule cell layer width in female rats

TRAP altered GFAP, but not S100β, immunoreactivity, and this effect was observed only in the DG, which contains a neurogenic region in the postnatal rat brain37,38. GFAP is also a biomarker of neural progenitor cells in the rodent hippocampus37,39, therefore, we next considered the possibility that altered GFAP expression in the DG might reflect TRAP effects on neurogenesis. Although neurogenesis in the mammalian brain primarily occurs prior to birth, a neurogenic zone persists in the postnatal and adult subgranular zone (SGZ)38,40. Newborn neurons arise from neural stem cells in the SGZ, and then migrate into the granule cell layer (GCL) as they mature. To quantify neurogenesis, we first measured expression of the immature neuronal marker DCX in the SGZ and the GCL (Fig. 3a, b). Sex had a significant main effect on DCX expression (F (1,17) = 5.697, p = 0.0289), therefore, the effects of TRAP were examined separately in male and females. Post hoc analyses showed that TRAP increased DCX expression in males (Sidak’s test; p = 0.012), but not females (p = 0.291). Co-immunostaining with the cell proliferation biomarker Ki6741, indicated that TRAP significantly increased the percentage of Ki67+/DCX+ cells in the SGZ and GCL of males (Fig. 3a, c; Sidak’s test, p = 0.021). TRAP had no significant effect on the percentage of Ki67+/DCX+ in the SGZ and GCL of females (Sidak’s test, p = 0.451).

In order to determine whether TRAP altered expression of mature neuronal markers, we used the mature neuronal cell biomarker, NeuN32, to quantify GCL width at PND 51–55 (Fig. 3d). Analysis by 2-way ANOVA indicated a significant interaction between exposure and sex on GCL width (F (1,16) = 11.38, p = 0.0039). Post hoc analysis indicated that TRAP significantly increased GCL width in females (Sidak’s test; p = 0.009), suggesting that more mature neurons were present in the GCL of TRAP vs. FA females. There were no significant differences in GCL width between TRAP and FA males (Sidak’s test; p = 0.290).

To determine whether sex-specific effects of TRAP on apoptosis contributed to the sex-specific differences in TRAP effects on immature vs. mature neuronal markers, we performed TUNEL staining. Very few apoptotic cells were detected by TUNEL in the male or female DG (Fig. 3e, f). This likely reflects the developmental stage of the brain at the time of analysis, and not a technical issue with the TUNEL stain, since numerous apoptotic cells were detected in brain sections treated with DNase I as a positive control42. Analysis by 2-way ANOVA did not indicate any significant main effects of sex or exposure, or an interaction between these factors on apoptosis.

Neurogenesis is regulated by transcription and growth factors, including Sox2, Igf2, and Igf14345. Sox2 is a master transcription factor that regulates neurogenesis in the DG in utero and during postnatal development43. Sox2 transcript levels were increased in some TRAP males relative to FA males, but this effect was highly variable, and not statistically significant (Fig. 3g; Sidak’s test, p = 0.204). Sox2 transcript levels were not altered by TRAP in females (Sidak’s test, p = 0.983). In contrast, transcript levels of Igf1, a growth factor implicated in autism spectrum disorder44 and known to enhance neurogenesis45, were significantly increased by TRAP in males (Fig. 3g; Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.039) and increased, but not significantly, in females (Fig. 3g; Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.052). This effect was specific to Igf1, as Igf2 transcript levels were not affected by TRAP in females or males (Fig. 3g; Sidak’s test, p = 0.8826 and p = 0.9932, respectively).

Lateral ventricle size is decreased in TRAP females

Altered lateral ventricle size has been observed in the brains of patients with autism, with studies reporting both decreases46 and increases47,48. In a mouse model, developmental exposure to ultrafine particulate matter increased lateral ventricle size18. To determine whether TRAP altered lateral ventricle size in our model, a cohort of subjects that previously underwent behavioral testing (Figs. 1c and 4) were imaged by MR. Analysis by 2-way ANOVA indicated that sex had a significant main effect on lateral ventricle size (F (1,54) = 11.22, p = 0.002) and brain volume (F (1,56) = 51.96, p < 0.0001). Post hoc analyses indicated that TRAP significantly decreased lateral ventricular volume in females (Fig. 4a, b; Student’s t test, p = 0.003). The decrease was not due to effects of TRAP exposure on whole-brain volume, which was not significantly different between TRAP and FA females (Fig. 4c; Student’s t test; p = 0.741). In contrast, TRAP had no significant effect on lateral ventricular volume or whole brain volume in males (Fig. 4b, c; Student’s t test, p = 0.807 and p = 0.708, respectively).

Fig. 4. TRAP decreases lateral ventricle volume and increases GCL width in females.

Fig. 4

a Representative MR images of female brains at postnatal day 53-55. Arrows indicate location of lateral ventricles. b Lateral ventricular volumes and (c) whole brain volumes in TRAP vs. FA females and males. d Representative images of the GCL and SGZ from TRAP vs. FA females. Bar = 100 µm. e Quantification of immature neurons measured as percent area within the SGZ and CGL immunopositive for DCX. f Quantification of cycling immature neurons quantified as percentage of Ki67+/DCX+ cells. g Mature neuron numbers estimated as the GCL width based on NeuN immunoreactivity. h Correlation between lateral ventricular volume and GCL width in female rats (Spearman correlation coefficient; r = −0.6041, p = 0.0428; n = 11 animals). White = FA; gray = TRAP. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 (Student’s t test).

Decreased lateral ventricle size is correlated with increased GCL width in TRAP females

Since behavioral testing can alter neurogenesis49, we tested whether the TRAP-specific changes in neurogenesis we observed in subjects that did not undergo behavior testing were also observed in the MR-imaged cohort that were tested for behavior. In the cohort of animals imaged by MR, TRAP exposure significantly increased the area of DCX immunoreactivity in males (Student’s t test, p = 0.0113), but not females (Student’s t test, p = 0.4428), indicating TRAP increased neurogenesis in males (Fig. 4d, e). However, in this cohort, TRAP did not increase the percentage of DCX+ cells that were also immunopositive for Ki67 in males or females (Fig. 4f; Student’s t test, p = 0.463, p = 0.612, respectively). GCL width was significantly increased in TRAP females vs. FA females (Fig. 4g; Student’s t test, p = 0.0236). GCL width was increased, but not significantly, in TRAP males (Student’s t test, p = 0.052).

Since decreased lateral ventricle size has been hypothesized to result from early increases in brain growth46, we determined whether lateral ventricle size was significantly correlated with neurogenic markers in our subjects. In females, we observed a negative relationship between lateral ventricle size and GCL width (Spearman correlation coefficient; r = -0.6014, p = 0.0428) (Fig. 4h), suggesting that the neurogenesis trends we observed by histopathology in female rats were correlated with MRI lateral ventricle volume.

Discussion

Epidemiologic studies have linked TRAP and near-roadway exposures to increased risk of NDDs10,11,14, and multiple preclinical studies have linked developmental exposure to high levels of selected components of TRAP to NDD-relevant phenotypes in mice18,20,21,50. Here, we extend these studies to demonstrate that real-world TRAP exposures that preserve the gaseous and particulate components of TRAP, and capture the daily fluctuations in levels of these components, alter neurogenesis and growth in the developing rat brain. Specifically, we observed that TRAP: (i) increases DCX expression, a proxy measure for neurogenesis51,52, in the SGZ and GCL of males; (ii) increases the percentage of cycling neural progenitor cells (Ki67+/DCX+) in the SGZ of males; (iii) increases GCL width, which reflects numbers of mature neurons32, in females; (iv) decreases lateral ventricular volume in females; and (v) increases Igf1 transcripts, which can promote brain growth45,53,54, in both males and females. These observations, which to our knowledge are the first preclinical evidence that TRAP increases neurogenesis in male rats, and increases granule cell layer width in female rats, suggest a biologically plausible mechanism by which TRAP may increase NDD risk.

Many NDDs have a strong sex bias, although the affected sex differs by disorder55. Epidemiologic studies have largely focused on TRAP in the context of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which are more commonly diagnosed in males55. Clinical studies have shown that increased brain volume in early life is characteristic of a subset of children diagnosed with ASD56,57, and MRI studies have shown decreased lateral ventricle size in young boys with ASD46, presumably as a result of brain overgrowth. In this regard, our finding of increased neurogenesis in the male brain is consistent with the human literature. While the observation of increased granule cell layer width and decreased lateral ventricle size in the female brain does not fit the sex bias profiles of ASD and ADHD, altered patterns of cellular proliferation and neuronal differentiation are common to the pathogenesis of many NDDs and intellectual disabilities that affect both males and females1,58. Moreover, many genetic risk factors for NDDs have functional roles in pathways that control neurogenesis5860, such as FMR156 and PTEN41. Thus, TRAP may be an environmental risk factor for NDDs in addition to ASD and ADHD.

Our observation of decreased lateral ventricle size in female but not male rats differs from several previously published studies of mice that reported increased ventricle size in both males18 and females21 in response to TRAP. These discrepant findings may reflect differences in TRAP exposure levels, windows of exposure, and species between our study and these previous studies. Alternatively, it may be that we observed sex differences in this outcome because males initially exhibit slower postnatal brain growth compared to females57. Thus the sex-specific effect of TRAP on brain growth phenotypes we observed at a single time point in development (PND 51–55) may reflect sex differences in intrinsic brain growth trajectories. Perhaps if we had examined later developmental times, we would have observed decreased lateral ventricles in males as well. Indeed, our MRI data indicated such a trend in TRAP males.

In contrast to our findings, two recent studies reported that TRAP decreases neurogenesis in rodent models. However, there are significant differences in the exposure paradigms between our study and these previous reports. In one study23, 8-week old mice were acutely exposed to diesel exhaust particles at 250–300 µg/m3 for 6 h, while in the second study24, rats were exposed to nanoparticles at 340 µg/m3 for 5 h/day from GD 2 to PND 175. By contrast, our peak PM2.5 levels varied between 18.84 and 37.68 µg/m3, and were delivered chronically from GD 15 to PND 50. Our window of exposure approximated mid-gestation to early adolescence in humans57,61, and our exposure paradigm mirrored traffic flow patterns, creating an “intermittent” exposure pattern, rather than a constant insult. Given the intermittent exposure and modest concentrations, it is perhaps not surprising that we observed TRAP to have an effect on neurogenesis that was opposite to that reported in previous studies. Cycles of injury and repair in the brain, particularly in the developing brain, have been shown to contribute to changes in circuit connectivity62,63, and a key determinant of circuit connectivity is neurogenesis64,65. It is important to note, however, that our study is consistent with one of these previous reports in that decreased neurogenesis in TRAP-exposed animals was specific to males23. Our finding that TRAP alters brain growth is consistent with several other studies of intermittent air pollution exposures. For example, male mice exposed to diesel exhaust particles during gestation showed increased cortical volume prior to birth, although this switched to decreased volume at PND 3020. Other studies have noted increased oligodendrogenesis and myelin production21,66,67 in male and female mice exposed to ultrafine particulate matter during gestation. Collectively, these studies underscore the importance of timing, duration, and type of exposure in dictating neurodevelopmental phenotypes.

In comparing our neuroinflammatory findings with human data, there are again similarities and differences. We observed increased IBA1+ cell density in both male and female TRAP-exposed animals, which is consistent with findings in postmortem ASD brains68. However, human studies report increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in children diagnosed with ASD6971, while the only TRAP-specific change we observed in cytokine levels was increased IL-10 in TRAP females. In the brain, IL-10 is predominantly expressed by microglia, consistent with our observation of increased microglial density in the hippocampus of TRAP animals. Since IL-10 is considered an anti-inflammatory cytokine that suppresses excessive inflammation72, it is possible that the IL-10 increase we observed in TRAP brains at PND 51–55 was a compensatory response to earlier inflammatory insults. Indeed, our findings echo those of other models that used intermittent exposure to ultrafine particulate matter, which reported decreased IL-1β and IL-6 in the brains of mice18.

The unexpected decrease in GFAP immunoreactivity that we observed in the DG of TRAP animals may reflect early perturbations in neurodevelopment. Specifically, during neurogenesis, there is an established neurogenesis-to-astrogenesis switch, in which the initial production of neurons transitions to the generation of astrocytes needed to support these neurons36. Although the mechanisms controlling this switch have not been fully elucidated, IL-6 signaling, neural activity, and the BMP family of growth factors are implicated73. It is hypothesized that interference with this process during development may result in delayed astrogenesis that contributes to the pathogenesis of NDDs36.

Living in close proximity to roadways increases exposure to not only TRAP, but also noise and vibration, which are both associated with maternal stress, adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes8, and poor cognition74. Since TRAP and FA animals were similarly exposed to noise and vibration in the exposure facility, it seems likely that differential outcomes between these groups were predominantly due to TRAP. However, we cannot rule out potential interactions between TRAP and noise/vibration. Another limitation of our study is that we only examined neuropathology at one time point. Thus, we cannot determine whether gestational or postnatal exposures were more important in driving TRAP-associated neurogenesis phenotypes. In humans and in rodents, the majority of neurons within the brain are generated prenatally36,38. After birth, neurogenesis declines rapidly, and in the adult brain, it is largely absent except in the SGZ and SVZ, where neurogenesis occurs throughout life, albeit at declining levels38,75. Since the majority of granule cells in the rat DG are generated in the first three postnatal weeks76,77, it seems plausible that postnatal exposures to TRAP are critical. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that exposure during gestation was ultimately responsible for the neurogenesis phenotypes we observed.

In conclusion, our data are among the first to link TRAP to increased neurogenesis in male rats, and increased granule cell layer width in female rats. Given other laboratory and clinical data identifying altered patterns of neurogenesis and brain growth as a pathogenic mechanism of NDDs60,78, our data support a model in which TRAP exposure during critical developmental windows can bias brain growth towards NDD phenotypes.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Donald Bruun for help collecting tissues, and Jonas Calsbeek and Brad Hobson for assistance with in vivo imaging experiments. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH; grants R21 ES025570, R21 ES026515, and P30 ES023513). KTP was supported by NIH-funded predoctoral training programs awarded to the University of California, Davis (UC Davis; T32 MH112507 and T32 ES007059). This project used core facilities supported by the UC Davis MIND Institute Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC; U54 HD079125) and the IDDRC at Washington University in Saint Louis (U54 HD087011).

Data availability

Data from this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Supplemental information including detailed methods, supplemental figures, and supplemental tables is available from the Translational Psychiatry website.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at (10.1038/s41398-020-0845-3).

References

  • 1.Ernst C. Proliferation and differentiation deficits are a major convergence point for neurodevelopmental disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39:290–299. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meredith RM. Sensitive and critical periods during neurotypical and aberrant neurodevelopment: a framework for neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2015;50:180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baxter AJ, et al. The epidemiology and global burden of autism spectrum disorders. Psychol. Med. 2015;45:601–613. doi: 10.1017/S003329171400172X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lyall K, et al. The changing epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2017;38:81–102. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hertz-Picciotto I, Schmidt RJ, Krakowiak P. Understanding environmental contributions to autism: causal concepts and the state of science. Autism Res. 2018;11:554–586. doi: 10.1002/aur.1938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Becerra TA, et al. Ambient air pollution and autism in Los Angeles county, California. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013;121:380–386. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kerin T, et al. Association between air pollution exposure, cognitive and adaptive function, and ASD severity among children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2018;48:137–50.. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3304-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Volk HE, et al. Residential proximity to freeways and autism in the CHARGE study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011;119:873–877. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Volk HE, et al. Traffic-related air pollution, particulate matter, and autism. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:71–77. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Raz R, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and autism spectrum disorder: a population-based nested case-control study in Israel. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2018;187:717–725. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Edwards SC, et al. Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and children’s intelligence at 5 years of age in a prospective cohort study in Poland. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010;118:1326–1331. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Perera FP, et al. Prenatal exposure to air pollution, maternal psychological distress, and child behavior. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e1284–e1294. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guxens M, et al. Air pollution during pregnancy and childhood cognitive and psychomotor development: six European birth cohorts. Epidemiology. 2014;25:636–647. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim E, et al. Prenatal exposure to PM(1)(0) and NO(2) and children’s neurodevelopment from birth to 24 months of age: mothers and Children’s Environmental Health (MOCEH) study. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;481:439–445. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Min JY, Min KB. Exposure to ambient PM10 and NO2 and the incidence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in childhood. Environ. Int. 2017;99:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Costa LG, et al. Neurotoxicity of traffic-related air pollution. Neurotoxicology. 2017;59:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Karner AA, Eisinger DS, Niemeier DA. Near-roadway air quality: synthesizing the findings from real-world data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44:5334–5344. doi: 10.1021/es100008x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Allen JL, et al. Early postnatal exposure to ultrafine particulate matter air pollution: persistent ventriculomegaly, neurochemical disruption, and glial activation preferentially in male mice. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014;122:939–945. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bolton JL, Auten RL, Bilbo SD. Prenatal air pollution exposure induces sexually dimorphic fetal programming of metabolic and neuroinflammatory outcomes in adult offspring. Brain Behav. Immun. 2014;37:30–44. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bolton JL, et al. Gestational exposure to air pollution alters cortical volume, microglial morphology, and microglia-neuron interactions in a sex-specific manner. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2017;9:10. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2017.00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Klocke, C. et al. Exposure to fine and ultrafine particulate matter during gestation alters postnatal oligodendrocyte maturation, proliferation capacity, and myelination. Neurotoxicology65, 196–206 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Chang, Y.-C. et al. Prenatal and early life diesel exhaust exposure disrupts cortical lamina organization: evidence for a reelin-related pathogenic pathway induced by interleukin-6. Brain Behav. Immunity78, 105–115 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Coburn, J. L., Cole, T. B., Dao, K. T., Costa, L. G. Acute exposure to diesel exhaust impairs adult neurogenesis in mice: prominence in males and protective effect of pioglitazone. Arch Toxicol.92, 1515–1829 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Woodward NC, et al. Prenatal and early life exposure to air pollution induced hippocampal vascular leakage and impaired neurogenesis in association with behavioral deficits. Transl. Psychiatry. 2018;8:261. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0317-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carosino CM, et al. Allergic airway inflammation is differentially exacerbated by daytime and nighttime ultrafine and submicron fine ambient particles: heme oxygenase-1 as an Indicator of PM-mediated allergic inflammation. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A. 2015;78:254–266. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2014.959627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Plummer LE, et al. Pulmonary inflammatory effects of source-oriented particulate matter from California’s San Joaquin Valley. Atmos. Environ. 2015;119:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Papapostolou V, et al. Development and characterization of an exposure generation system to investigate the health effects of particles from fresh and aged traffic emissions. Air Qual., Atmos. Health. 2012;6:419–429. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gross DS, et al. Single particle characterization of automobile and diesel truck emissions in the Caldecott Tunnel. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2000;32:152–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Knibbs LD, de Dear RJ, Morawska L, Mengersen KL. On-road ultrafine particle concentration in the M5 East road tunnel, Sydney, Australia. Atmos. Environ. 2009;43:3510–3519. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Berg, E. et al. Developmental Exposure to Near Roadway Pollution Produces Behavioral Phenotypes Relevant to Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Juvenile Rats. Trans. Psych. (Submitted). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Hobson BA, et al. TSPO PET Using [18F]PBR111 reveals persistent neuroinflammation following acute diisopropylfluorophosphate intoxication in the rat. Toxicol. Sci. 2019;170:330–344. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Oishi S, et al. Usp9x-deficiency disrupts the morphological development of the postnatal hippocampal dentate gyrus. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:25783. doi: 10.1038/srep25783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Keil KP, et al. In vivo and in vitro sex differences in the dendritic morphology of developing murine hippocampal and cortical neurons. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:8486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08459-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Prinz M, Priller J. Microglia and brain macrophages in the molecular age: from origin to neuropsychiatric disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014;15:300–312. doi: 10.1038/nrn3722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lenz KM, Nelson LH. Microglia and beyond: innate immune cells as regulators of brain development and behavioral function. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:698. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sloan SA, Barres BA. Mechanisms of astrocyte development and their contributions to neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2014;27:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kriegstein A, Alvarez-Buylla A. The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2009;32:149–184. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kempermann G, Song H, Gage FH. Neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015;7:a018812. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu Y, et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein-expressing neural progenitors give rise to immature neurons via early intermediate progenitors expressing both glial fibrillary acidic protein and neuronal markers in the adult hippocampus. Neuroscience. 2010;166:241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Toda T, Gage FH. Review: adult neurogenesis contributes to hippocampal plasticity. Cell Tissue Res. 2018;373:693–709. doi: 10.1007/s00441-017-2735-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Amiri A, et al. Pten deletion in adult hippocampal neural stem/progenitor cells causes cellular abnormalities and alters neurogenesis. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:5880–5890. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5462-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kyrylkova, K., Kyryachenko, S., Leid, M., Kioussi, C. in Odontogenesis: Methods and Protocols (ed. Kioussi, C.). 41–47 (Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2012).
  • 43.Beckervordersandforth R, Zhang C-L, Lie DC. Transcription-factor-dependent control of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015;7:a018879. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mills JL, et al. Elevated levels of growth-related hormones in autism and autism spectrum disorder. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 2007;67:230–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02868.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nieto-Estévez V, Defterali Ç, Vicario-Abejón C. IGF-I: a key growth factor that regulates neurogenesis and synaptogenesis from embryonic to adult stages of the brain. Front. Neurosci. 2016;10:52. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vidal CN, et al. Three-dimensional mapping of the lateral ventricles in autism. Psychiatry Res.: Neuroimaging. 2008;163:106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gilmore JH, et al. Prenatal mild ventriculomegaly predicts abnormal development of the neonatal brain. Biol. Psychiatry. 2008;64:1069–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Owen JP, et al. Brain MR imaging findings and associated outcomes in carriers of the reciprocal copy number variation at 16p11.2. Radiology. 2018;286:217–26.. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mustroph ML, et al. Aerobic exercise is the critical variable in an enriched environment that increases hippocampal neurogenesis and water maze learning in male C57BL/6J mice. Neuroscience. 2012;219:62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Allen JL, et al. Developmental exposure to concentrated ambient ultrafine particulate matter air pollution in mice results in persistent and sex-dependent behavioral neurotoxicity and glial activation. Toxicol. Sci. 2014;140:160–178. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Couillard-Despres S, et al. Doublecortin expression levels in adult brain reflect neurogenesis. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005;21:1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03813.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vukovic J, et al. Immature doublecortin-positive hippocampal neurons are important for learning but not for remembering. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:6603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3064-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.O’Kusky JR, Ye P, D’Ercole AJ. Insulin-like growth factor-I promotes neurogenesis and synaptogenesis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus during postnatal development. J. Neurosci. 2000;20:8435–8442. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-22-08435.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Popken GJ, et al. In vivo effects of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on prenatal and early postnatal development of the central nervous system. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004;19:2056–2068. doi: 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03320.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ferri SL, Abel T, Brodkin ES. Sex differences in autism spectrum disorder: a review. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2018;20:9. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0874-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Khalfallah O, et al. Depletion of the fragile X mental retardation protein in embryonic stem cells alters the kinetics of neurogenesis. Stem Cells (Dayton, OH) 2017;35:374–85. doi: 10.1002/stem.2505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dobbing J, Sands J. Comparative aspects of the brain growth spurt. Early Hum. Dev. 1979;3:79–83. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(79)90022-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Packer A. Neocortical neurogenesis and the etiology of autism spectrum disorder. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016;64:185–195. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Parikshak NN, et al. Integrative functional genomic analyses implicate specific molecular pathways and circuits in autism. Cell. 2013;155:1008–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gilbert J, Man H-Y. Fundamental elements in autism: from neurogenesis and neurite growth to synaptic plasticity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017;11:359. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Semple BD, et al. Brain development in rodents and humans: Identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species. Prog. Neurobiol. 2013;106-107:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kitagawa K, Matsumoto M, Hori M. Protective and regenerative response endogenously induced in the ischemic brain. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2001;79:262–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Peretto P, Merighi A, Fasolo A, Bonfanti L. The subependymal layer in rodents: a site of structural plasticity and cell migration in the adult mammalian brain. Brain Res. Bull. 1999;49:221–243. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(99)00037-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Scafidi J, Fagel DM, Ment LR, Vaccarino FM. Modeling premature brain injury and recovery. Int J. Dev. Neurosci. 2009;27:863–871. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2009.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Vaccarino FM, Ment LR. Injury and repair in developing brain. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F190–F192. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.043661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Allen JL, et al. Developmental neurotoxicity of inhaled ambient ultrafine particle air pollution: Parallels with neuropathological and behavioral features of autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurotoxicology. 2017;59:140–154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2015.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Klocke, C. et al. Enhanced cerebellar myelination with concomitant iron elevation and ultrastructural irregularities following prenatal exposure to ambient particulate matter in the mouse. Inhal Toxicol.30, 381–396 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 68.Morgan JT, et al. Microglial activation and increased microglial density observed in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in autism. Biol. Psychiatry. 2010;68:368–376. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Molloy CA, et al. Elevated cytokine levels in children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Neuroimmunol. 2006;172:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2005.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vargas DL, et al. Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism. Ann. Neurol. 2005;57:67–81. doi: 10.1002/ana.20315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Li X, et al. Elevated immune response in the brain of autistic patients. J. Neuroimmunol. 2009;207:111–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lobo-Silva D, et al. Balancing the immune response in the brain: IL-10 and its regulation. J. neuroinflammation. 2016;13:297. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0763-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Miller FD, Gauthier AS. Timing is everything: making neurons versus glia in the developing cortex. Neuron. 2007;54:357–369. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Barzegar M, et al. Prenatal exposure to noise stress: anxiety, impaired spatial memory, and deteriorated hippocampal plasticity in postnatal life. Hippocampus. 2015;25:187–196. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Eriksson PS, et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat. Med. 1998;4:1313. doi: 10.1038/3305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hochgerner H, Zeisel A, Lönnerberg P, Linnarsson S. Conserved properties of dentate gyrus neurogenesis across postnatal development revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Neurosci. 2018;21:290–299. doi: 10.1038/s41593-017-0056-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bandeira F, Lent R, Herculano-Houzel S. Changing numbers of neuronal and non-neuronal cells underlie postnatal brain growth in the rat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2009;106:14108–14113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804650106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kaushik G, Zarbalis KS. Prenatal neurogenesis in autism spectrum disorders. Front Chem. 2016;4:12. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2016.00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data from this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Supplemental information including detailed methods, supplemental figures, and supplemental tables is available from the Translational Psychiatry website.


Articles from Translational Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES