Abstract
Acanthamoeba, a genus that contains at least 24 species of free-living protozoa, is ubiquitous in nature. Successful treatment of Acanthamoeba infections is always very difficult and not always effective. More effective drugs must be developed, and medicinal plants may have a pivotal part in the future of drug discovery. Our research focused on investigating the in vitro anti- acanthamoebic potential of Leea indica and its constituent gallic acid in different concentrations. Water and butanol fractions exhibited significant amoebicidal activity against trophozoites and cysts. Gallic acid (100 µg/mL) revealed 83% inhibition of trophozoites and 69% inhibition of cysts. The butanol fraction induced apoptosis in trophozoites, which was observed using tunnel assay. The cytotoxicity of the fractions and gallic acid was investigated against MRC-5 and no adverse effects were observed. Gallic acid was successfully loaded within poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles with 82.86% encapsulation efficiency, while gallic acid showed 98.24% in vitro release at 48 hours. Moreover, the gallic acid encapsulated in the PLGA nanoparticles exhibited 90% inhibition against trophozoites. In addition, gallic acid encapsulated nanoparticles showed reduced cytotoxicity towards MRC-5 compared to gallic acid, which evidenced that natural product nanoencapsulation in polymeric nanoparticles could play an important role in the delivery of natural products.
Subject terms: Drug delivery, Infection
Introduction
Leea indica (Burm. f.) Merr. (Family-Leeaceae), commonly known as kur jiwa, arengi or achila gaeh, is widespread in tropical and subtropical regions, for example, Malaysia, China, Thailand, India and Bangladesh1. Several known chemical compounds have been isolated from the leaves of Leea indica, which includes phthalic acid, ursolic acid, gallic acid, β-sitosterol, palmitic acid, farnesol, lupeol and 1-eicosanol. Apart from that, Srinivasan et al. identified other compounds such as lycopersen, heptadecane, isooctyl phthalate, butyl-2-phthalate, butyl-2-ethylhexyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate, butyl gallate, triterpenes and sterol from the methanol extract2. Among these isolated compounds, di-n-butyl phthalate exhibited antibacterial and antifungal properties3, while butyl gallate was an antioxidant4. Interestingly, gallic acid is the one that has been reported to have several biological activities, mainly antioxidant, anti-tyrosinase, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and neuro-protective activities5. Gallic acid was isolated from several medicinal plants, including the butanol fraction of Crassula ovata (Mill.) Druce leaves by Tombozara et al.6. More recently, through LC-MS/MS, some phytochemicals have been identified in the leaves of Leea indica, such as phenols, flavonoids, benzoic acid derivatives, dihydrochalcones, coumarins, catechins, oxylipins and megastigmans7. It is a green shrub with a maximum growth of 2–3 m in height, with firm and soft woody shoots2. L. indica is used to treat cancer, diabetes, heart disease, skin problems, such as skin rashes and allergic reactions8,9, and various diseases, such as fever and dizziness, as well as diarrhea and chronic dysentery10, an inflammatory disease of the lower intestinal tract, commonly caused by bacterial, parasitic, or protozoal infection11,12. Leaves are generally expended crude or taken in blended form from fresh leaves13. There are several traditional uses of L. indica as herbal medicines by the tribes of Bangladesh. The leaves are used for obstetric diseases, body pain, diabetes, vertigo and birth control14. The root of L. indica is used as an antidysenteric, antidiarrheal, antiplasmodic and also to treat heart disease and cancer. It is reported that the whole plant is used for body aches, headaches and skin complaints. L. indica is believed to have therapeutic activities to expel wind and eliminate dampness (Chinese: 驅風祛濕, Dampness) in traditional Chinese medicine, as well as clearing internal heat and poison (Chinese: 清熱解毒, Detoxification). Here “poison” is a term in traditional Chinese medicine that refers to the body´s infectious factor15. Recently, Siew (2019) using several cancer cell lines, demonstrated the great effectiveness of the methanol extract of L. indica16. Overall, L. indica is reported to have high medical values. It is a convenient, inexpensive and potent antibiotic with minimal toxicity. However, its anti-amoebic potential needs further investigation.
Free-living amoebas (FLA) are universal protozoa, found in soil, air and water. They are part of natural and artificial ecosystem. One of the main reasons for the expansion of these pathogenic amoebas is the transformation of plants into natural specialties by Wastewater Treatment Plants (WTPs). These ecological niches are suitable for the colonization of FLAs and establish their territory, since they feed on microorganisms, mainly bacteria. Forms of organic cleaning are not intended to evacuate microbiological defilement, although they help to decrease some microbial populations. Currently, only a few genera and types of FLAs have been portrayed as pathogenic, but each represents a risk as a supply of pathogens. Their cystic stage provides protection against unfavorable conditions and regular disinfectants, allowing them to resist forms of water refinement and colonize in treated water structures. In previous examinations, pathogenic Acanthamoeba was isolated from different water sources which overwhelmingly incorporate channel water, swimming pool, rain storage, ponds and lakes17–19.
The mortality or morbidity rate associated with Acanthamoeba infections varies according to the type of disease. As in amoebic keratitis, the disease does not turn into systemic infection or death. However, other factors, including progressive visual loss, abscess formation, cataracts, scleritis, glaucoma and ulceration, can lead to complications in keratitis infection20. Delay in therapy, use of steroids, and development of extracoronal manifestations are common features that contribute for worse ocular prognosis. Current drugs have limited efficacy, except for use in early stages20. Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE) has a high mortality rate of around 100%. Apart from that, disseminated infections without central nervous system (CNS) involvement account for high mortality rates, although still lower than GAE21. Treatments against Acanthamoeba infections, including natural products and various chemotherapeutic agents, have been reported in in vitro studies for potential amoebicidal activity, but the results remain controversial. Adequate information is still lacking as to whether these agents are effective in patients with granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE)22–24. Combined therapy has been found to be more effective than a single drug used in human infections. No single drug is active against the cyst and trophozoite stages of Acanthamoeba infections, which can result in spread to the lungs, skin, central nervous system (CNS), and other organs, depending on the host´s immune status. Therefore, increasing awareness of Acanthamoeba as a potential source of infections is critical, as it is important for early diagnosis and treatment. Treatments with pentamidine, ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, metronidazole and amphotericin B do not treat lesions in immunosuppressed patients with sinusitis and skin lesions25. Based on the literature review, much research is being conducted to explore new effective, less toxic and low-cost therapeutic agents for the treatment of Acanthamoeba infections. However, the emergence of resistance to common antimicrobials agents has been remarkably observed in recent years in the treatment of amoebic keratitis (AK)26–28. The apparent cause of this resistance is the presence of the cyst cell wall as a physical barrier, and not as a result of the dormant cyst itself. Lazuana and colleagues (2019) have shown that cellulase has the potential to degrade the cyst wall of Acanthamoeba sp. cysts29.
Nanotechnology is a branch of applied science and technology which deals with the development of devices and dosage forms in the range of 1 to 100 nm. This new technology has emerged as a new approach to investigate new paths in which traditional methodologies have failed to impact the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of various diseases30. The delivery of innumerable therapeutic agents or active compounds at the desired site of action can be adequately enhanced by nanometer-sized entities, maintaining the activity of the loaded drug31–35. Specifically, nanotechnology entities can be used to overcome problems such as short half-life, low solubility and reduce toxicity, which will help to deliver conventional natural products more efficiently.
Thus, this study proposes to assess the anti-amoebic potential of several fractions of Leea indica and its constituent gallic acid. In this study, gallic acid was encapsulated in poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) PLGA nanoparticles to increase efficiency with minimal cytotoxic effects. The current study was conducted against pathogenic Acanthamoeba as an effort to develop new, more effective therapeutic agents with less cytotoxicity.
Results
Amoebicidal assay
Trophozoites
All fractions of Leea indica showed potent trophocidal activity at three different concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 mg/mL. However, the aqueous fraction of Leea indica showed more than 80% of trophocidal activity at all concentrations (0.5–1.0 mg/mL), considered significant compared to standard chlorhexidine. The Leea indica butanol fraction exhibited 60% trophocidal activity at 1.0 mg/mL, with the maximum decrease in amoebicidal activity shown by ethyl acetate fraction of Leea indica (60% at 1.5 mg/mL) (Fig. 1).
Cysts
The cysticidal potential of the water, butanol and ethyl acetate fractions was evaluated at three different concentrations in the range of 0.5 to 1.5 mg/mL compared to commercially available chlorhexidine. The butanol fraction of Leea indica exhibited the highest cysticidal activity by approximately 70% in the three concentrations. This cysticidal potential of butanol fraction of Leea indica was found to be significant compared to standard chlorhexidine. The ethyl acetate fraction of Leea indica indicated 55% inhibition of cysts at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL, while water fraction of Leea indica showed the least inhibition in Acanthamoeba cysts (45% inhibited cysts at 1.5 mg/mL) (Fig. 2).
Standardization and amoebicidal activity
The main constituent of Leea indica was confirmed by standardization with standard gallic acid (Fig. 3). Gallic acid was eluted at the 32-minute retention time of the Leea indica butanol fraction. Its constituent, gallic acid was evaluated for its activity against Acanthamoeba (trophozoites and cysts) in the concentration ranges from 25 to 100 µg/mL. Gallic acid showed inhibition of 83, 76.4 and 62.3% at concentrations of 100 (587.8 µM), 50 (293.9 µM) and 25 µg/mL (146.9 µM), respectively, 72 hours later against trophozoites (Fig. 4). As a result, the cysticidal activity of gallic acid was 69.0, 71.1 and 64.8% at 100 (587.8 µM), 50 (293.9 µM) and 25 µg/mL (146.9 µM), respectively (Fig. 5).
Size and morphology of Nano-GA-PLGA
The size and morphological examination of the gallic acid encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles were performed by SEM and TEM analysis. SEM and TEM revealed that PLGA nanoparticles loaded with gallic acid were sphere-shaped and approximately 100 nm in size. However, few synthesized nano-GA-PLGA have sheet-like morphological characteristics and 100 nm in size (approx.). All particles showed a smooth surface with wide dispersion of size and high capacity to form clusters (Fig. 6a,b). Probably, the aggregation of gallic acid nanoparticles may be due to the non-ionic surfactant used in the synthesis of nanoparticles, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), which may result in insufficient steric stabilization. Moreover, the matrix is created by the bonding of hydrophobic polyvinyl alcohol groups with the PLGA chain, while hydrophilic polyvinyl alcohol groups face the water phase.
Percent encapsulation and percent release
The spectrophotometer (SpectraMax, M3, Molecular Devices, Washington DC, USA) was used to confirm the encapsulation of gallic acid inside the PLGA nanoparticles. The absorbance was measured at 230 nm to detect free gallic acid and a standard curve was constructed to determine the concentration of gallic acid. Proficiency in trapping gallic acid was expressed as the percentage of active substance (gallic acid) loaded in the PLGA nanoparticles reported in the initial amount of gallic acid used for nanoparticles synthesis. Determinations were made in triplicates. The encapsulation efficiency allows for a specific amount of drug/compound encapsulated in the PLGA matrix. The encapsulation efficiency for gallic acid was 82.86%. Gallic acid showed maximum encapsulation efficiency in PLGA nanoparticles, after that no change in the encapsulation efficiency was observed, probably due to the saturation of gallic acid in the polymer dispersion36.
The in vitro release of gallic acid from nano-PLGA was studied in PBS at pH 7.4. The drug release was measured as a function of time. A maximum of 98.24% gallic acid was subsequently released after 48 hours (the release of drug from GA-PLGA nanoparticles within 24 hours was demonstrated in Fig. S3); no other releases were recorded after that. The release of the compound depends on several factors including temperature, type of nanoparticles, release medium and pH36. The burst release (21%) of GA from nano-PLGA was initially observed after 24 hours. The initial burst drug release may be due to the presence of gallic acid in the surface of PLGA NPs. The drug release was slow in the first 24 hours, as it had the polymer content and this has the impact of decelerating drug release as a result of the increase in the particle size and reduced surface area available for drug release. The percentage release of gallic acid was 98.24% from the GA- PLGA nanoparticles after 48 hours.
Amoebicidal activity of Nano-GA-PLGA
Gallic acid was successfully loaded into nano-PLGA using the single emulsion method. The amoebicidal activity of the encapsulated nano-GA-PLGA was evaluated at different concentrations (25, 50 and 100 µg/mL) at 24, 48 and 72 hours, respectively. Nano-GA-PLGA reduced the growth of trophozoites by 90.7% after 24 hours at 50 µg/mL (Fig. 4). GA-PLGA nanoparticles showed significant trophocidal activity at 100 µg/mL after 48 and 72 hours, which was considered significant compared to standard chlorhexidine. After 72 hours, nano-GA-PLGA inhibited the viability of trophozoites by 64.9, 77.4 and 90.0% at 25, 50 and 100 µg/mL respectively. In contrast, nano-GA-PLGA showed 31.5 and 38% inhibition of cyst viability after 48 and 72 hours respectively (at 100 µg/mL) (Fig. 5).
Cytotoxicity of GA and Nano-GA-PLGA on MRC-5 cells
The cytotoxicity assay was used to determine the cytotoxic effects of free gallic acid and gallic acid encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles (Nano-GA-PLGA). Lung epithelial cells (MRC-5) were exposed to varying concentration of test compounds ranging from 10 to 100 µg/mL (Fig. 7). Before encapsulation in PLGA nanoparticles, the IC50 of gallic acid was 10 µg/mL. A distinct reduction in the cytotoxicity of gallic acid was observed after encapsulating gallic acid into PLGA nanoparticles with an IC50 of 30 µg/mL (Fig. 7). The reduction in cytotoxicity may be due to the encapsulation of gallic acid.
Apoptotic effect of Leea indica fractions, GA and Nano-GA-PLGA
The programme cell death induced by fractions of Leea indica (butanol, water, and ethyl acetate), free gallic acid and gallic acid encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles (Nano-GA-PLGA) was evaluated using the TUNEL assay (Fig. 8a,b). The concentrations at which L. indica fractions and GA inhibited 50% of Acanthamoeba triangularis were used in the assay. DNA fragmentation was observed in the Leea indica butanol fraction (Fig. 8b). Brown precipitate was observed as a result of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) binding at the end of DNA fragments. It demonstrates that the apoptotic effect was caused by the butanol fraction of Leea indica.
Discussion
Several infectious diseases continue to increase over time. Patients infected with Acanthamoeba have been reported in large numbers since the past few years. Similarly, strains of Acanthamoeba resistant to standard courses of current therapy are also being more frequently recognized37. Therefore, new therapeutic agents are urgently needed for effective, less toxic and affordable treatment. Natural products derived from plants and microorganisms are an important source for drug discovery - mainly for parasites, due to the long association between coexistence of parasite, human and traditional herbal medicines38.
In the present study, L. indica plant with three different fractions and its constituent, gallic acid were evaluated against pathogenic Acanthamoeba as an effort to develop new, more effective therapeutic agents with less cytotoxicity. L. indica is a small shrub found in abundance in Southeast Asia, China and Malaysia. Its leaves and roots have traditionally been used as antineoplastic, antidiabetic, antipyretic and antiallergic agents8,39. Its constituent, gallic acid, is a natural benzoic acid belongs to the class of simple phenols. It is abundant in green tea, oak bark, grapes, sumac and gallnuts40,41. In this study, we found that all fractions of L. indica showed promising potential against the cyst as well as trophozoites stages of Acanthamoeba, which had not been previously reported. In addition, gallic acid had strong anti-amoebic properties. Although gallic acid has been reported for several activities, such as antibacterial, antifungal and anti-inflammatory activity42. In recent years, new drug delivery techniques have been introduced in natural secondary metabolites in order to improve their bioavailability. Encapsulation has been tried in parasitic treatment as a carrier of antiparasitic agent to increase its effects and decrease cytotoxicity43. Polymeric nanoparticles have been successfully used in the treatment of mice infected with Plamsodium yoelii and inhibited the parasitic infection by 100%44. In our previous study Pericampylus glaucus and Lonicera japonica exhibited amoebicidal activity against cysts and trophozoites and anti-encystment activity. Secondary metabolites of Pericampylus glaucus (periglaucine A and betulinic acid), were successfully loaded and showed antiparasitic potential against pathogenic Acanthamoeba45,46. Chemoprevention through the use of natural products has developed as an influential strategy with the potential to combat infectious diseases. In this study, the butanol fraction of L. indica demonstrated a 90% trophocidal potential and almost 70% inhibition of the cysts (minimum concentration of 0.5 mg/mL). The best result and the eradication of 90% of the Acanthamoeba trophozoites were achieved by the polymeric nano-encapsulation of gallic acid (GA-PLGA nanoparticles). The process of programmed cell death was investigated in Acanthamoeba by L. indica fractions, gallic acid and synthesized GA-PLGA nanoparticles. L. indica butanol fraction induced apoptosis in Acanthamoeba, according to the previous study, where evidence of apoptosis in Acanthamoeba was reported47. However, no brown precipitate was observed in the cells by gallic acid and GA-PLGA nanoparticles, indicating that inhibitions in the growth of Acanthamoeba were not due to apoptosis. This observation suggests that there could be other non-apoptotic pathways, such as pyroptosis and necroptosis, which deserve further investigation.
The release of drug form nanoparticles is a relevant aspect in the development of nanoformulation. Some circumstances influence the rate of drug release from nanoparticles, such as diffusion though nanoparticles, erosion of the nanoparticle matrix, combined process of erosion/diffusion and desorption of adsorbed drug. Therefore, the release of the drug by the nano-polymer depends on the diffusion and biodegradation48,49. A higher percentage of drug release was observed in gallic acid encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles (98.24%) after 48 hours.
The results of this study suggest that it is conceivable to control the release rate of gallic acid by adjusting the concentration of gallic acid and molecular parameters of PLGA. In contrast, the microsphere-based drug delivery system may have a higher percentage of burst release; therefore, a higher dose is generally needed50. The burst release can be controlled by reducing the polymer concentration. Drug release profiles are mainly affected by the evaporation temperature. Within a certain range of particle size, the rate of drug release is inversely proportional to the particle size and encapsulation efficiency, as drug release rate increases with the reduction in particle size36. Regarding cytotoxicity, we found that PLGA nanoparticles loaded with gallic acid showed a distinct reduction compared to unencapsulated gallic acid. Gallic acid, a strong antioxidant, despite having cell death-inducing effects on tumor cells, protects normal cells from the devastating effects of reactive oxygen species and therefore helps to extend the lifespan of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs), which are one of the most important parts of the body’s defence system against various infections, including AIDS5.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Reagents
Poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), Poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA), quercetin, chlorhexidine, MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide), Diaminobenzidine (DAB), RPMI 1640 cell culture medium, Fetal bovine serum (FBS), Phosphate buffer saline (PBS), Trypan blue, Paraformaldehyde, Ethanol, Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dichloromethane, gallic acid and apoptosis detection kit were acquired from commercial companies.
Plant collection
The leaves of Leea indica were freshly collected from the Penang Hill forest in Malaysia in February 2014 (322.24 g), and identified by Assoc. Prof. Dr Christophe Wiart, Faculty of Sciences, University of Nottingham, Malaysia Campus.
Extraction and fractionation
Fresh leaves of Leea indica were soaked in liquid nitrogen (Lindle, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Batch no: UN1977) and crushed into small pieces. The crushed leaves (262.24 g) were then soaked in 5 L of 70% ethanol solution and 30% purified water for 7 days at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) with occasional stirring. The extract was filtered through filter paper (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Winsford, United Kingdom). The whole filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure at 55°C through a rotatory vacuum evaporator (R-200, Buchi, Switzerland) to produce concentrated crude ethanolic extract (13.7459 g dark greenish brown, yield 5.24% w/w). A volume of 120 mL of the concentrated crude ethanolic extract was used to extract even more with hexane (3 × 40 mL) to achieve hexane-soluble and hexane-insoluble fractions. The hexane-insoluble fraction was further extracted with 3 × 40 mL of ethyl acetate to obtain an extract soluble in ethyl acetate and a residue insoluble in ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate-soluble portion was filtered through a decent amount of 97% pure anhydrous magnesium sulphate, (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium), using filter paper (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, United Kingdom) to remove any water contained therein. The residue insoluble in ethyl acetate was further partitioned between 3 × 40 mL of butan-1-ol to obtain the fraction soluble in butanol and an extract from aqueous layer. The procedure for the hexane extraction was repeated four times to produce a sufficient amount of hexane-soluble extract. The hexane-soluble, soluble in ethyl acetate, soluble in butanol and water extract were concentrated under reduced pressure to produce the concentrated fractionated hexane extract (0.9406 g dark yellowish brown, yield 6.84% w/w), extract ethyl acetate (2.2900 g dark greenish brown, yield 16.66% w/w), butanol extract (1.0891 g dark reddish brown, 7.92% w/w yield), and water extract (4.2545 g dark brown, yield 30.95% w/w) respectively.
Standardization of gallic acid
Qualitative HPLC analysis of gallic acid (butanol fraction) in potent fractions was performed by Agilent HPLC system (Series 110) supplied with a quaternary pump, diode array detector (1100 series DAD), automatic sampler, fraction collector and column of biphenyl 150 × 4.6 mM, QC mix 870 (Phenomenex, California, USA) was used. The mobile phase used was a mixture of acetonitrile (90%) and ultrapure water (10%) with a flow rate of 1 mL/minute, at 100 μL/minute of injection (multiple wavelengths; 220, 230, 240, 254, 270, 310, and 360 nm)45.
Acanthamoeba triangularis
Acanthamoeba isolation and cultivation
Water samples were obtained from the Department of Parasitology at the University of Malaya. About 1 mL of filtered water samples were loaded onto non-nutrient agar (NNA) plates. Escherichia coli (heat killed), used as a nutrient for the growth of Acanthamoeba, was pipetted into the NNA plates and then incubated at 26 °C. Observations were made using an inverted microscope to detect the presence of slow-moving trophozoites with prominent vacuoles and acanthapodia, or cysts with dominant double-walled triangular structures (3–5 arms). Trophozoites were confirmed between 48 to 72 hours after inoculation in the NNA, while cysts were observed after 14 days. The culture of Acanthamoeba triangularis (homogenous) was obtained by continuous subcultures before parasite DNA extraction46.
PCR analysis
Acanthamoeba triangularis isolates (trophozoites) were collected from the plate using 5 mL of Page’s Saline. The suspensions were left to centrifuge at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes. Additional DNA extraction was performed using the mini DNA Blood Kit from QIAGEN, Hiden, Germany. Amplification was studied with a PCR mixture containing 25 µL of distilled water, 10X DNA polymerase buffer, 25 mM magnesium chloride, 10 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) mixture (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania, USA), 200 moles of each primer: the forward primer JDP1 (5′-GGCCCAGATCGTTACCGTGAA-3′) and the reverse primer JDP2 (5′-TCTCACAAGCTGCTAGGGAGTCA-3′), 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lithuania, USA) with 5 µL of DNA template. The process was carried out at 94 °C for 5 minutes and followed by 40 annealing cycles at 84 °C, 60 °C and 72 °C for one minute each and an extension at 72 °C for 5 minutes. The DNA template retrieved with same amount of distilled water was used as a negative control19,46.
Molecular analysis
PCR amplifications were performed in the 18 S region as a target. PCR amplicon at 450 bp was analysed using electrophoresis gel (1.5%) in Tris-Acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer. The post-staining protocol was performed using ethidium bromide for visualization under UV light after purification of positive samples that were subsequently sequenced. BLAST software (National Centre for Biotechnology Information) was used for the homology search46.
Preparation of gallic acid (GA) loaded PLGA nanoparticles (Nano-GA- PLGA)
Loading of gallic acid onto nano-PLGA was achieved via the single emulsion method. 0.02 g of PLGA and 0.005 g of gallic acid in 2 mL DCM was vortexed for 1 minute until complete dissolution followed by emulsification by adding drops of this mixture of organic phase in 0.25% aqueous PVA for 10 minutes and then sonicated for 3 minutes at 50% amplitude using a probe sonicator (Athena technology, Maharashtra, India). After removing the DCM by evaporation, the resulting NPs were collected by centrifugation for 5 minutes (10,000 rpm) and washed thrice with distilled water. The resulting nano-GA-PLGA was lyophilized in a freeze dryer, Emitech K750X (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK) at −53 °C overnight and stored at −20 °C for further use33. The control was prepared following the same method without gallic acid.
Characterization and surface morphological evaluation of Nano-GA-PLGA
The morphology of nano-GA-PLGA was evaluated by the method previously reported by our group33 using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (FESEM, Quanta FEG 650, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Leo Libra-120 (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany).
Percent encapsulation and percent release of Nano-GA-PLGA
The gallic acid content in the nano-PLGA was assessed by a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax, M3, Molecular Devices, Washington DC, USA). Free gallic acid was estimated by measuring absorbance at 230 nm51 and preparing the standard curve of six known concentrations of gallic acid (0.05 µg/mL to 10 µg/mL). The percentage of gallic acid entrapment was calculated as follows:
In vitro release studies of nano-GA-PLGA were performed in PBS at pH 7.4. An amount of 15 mg of nano-GA-PLGA was added in 40 mL of PBS with consistent stirring for 72 hours at room temperature. At specific time intervals, the sample was collected, and fresh medium was added to maintain the volume. The collected media were centrifuged and the amount of gallic acid released was determined by a UV-visible spectrophotometer at 230 nm33.
Anti-Acanthamoeba assay
A 200 µL aliquot of trophozoites suspension or cysts calibrated with the same volume of ethyl acetate, butanol or water fractions of L. indica (0.5 mg/mL, 1.0 mg/mL and 1.5 mg/mL), gallic acid and nano-GA-PLGA at various concentrations such as 25 (146.9 µM), 50 (293.9 µM) and 100 µg/mL (587.8 µM) were carefully mixed in microcentrifuge tubes. Then, the tubes were kept in a standard incubator at 26 °C in the dark for 24, 48 and 72 hours. The similar procedure was applied to control tubes containing only 200 µL of sterile distilled water with 200 µL of trophozoite/cyst suspension. Chlorhexidine, a member of biguanide, used in the treatment of amoebic keratitis, was used as a reference drug control (positive control) and subjected to the same procedure. Chlorhexidine was used in concentrations of 4 µg and 25 µg in 1 mL of sterile distilled water for trophozoites and cysts, respectively52,53. After the incubation period of 24, 48 and 72 hours at 26 °C, 10 µL of trophozoite or cyst suspension were transferred to 10 µL of 0.4% trypan blue. Unstained (viable) and stained (non-viable) trophozoites/cysts were individually counted in the hemocytometer counting chamber, 3 minutes after stain addition. Unstained/stained trophozoites or cysts were counted and listed46.
Cytotoxicity tests
The cytotoxicity assay of nano-GA-PLGA was used to determine the cytotoxicity profile of gallic acid, PLGA NPs (without compound) and nano-GA-PLGA in MRC-5 cell lines (lung epithelial cells). Six different concentrations of each sample ranging from 10 µg/mL to 120 µg/mL were investigated using the MTT assay, as previously described by Mosmann (1983). MRC-5 cells were cultured in complete growth medium (Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)). Five to six passages were made. Cultures were further checked and media changed after 48–72 hours, depending on growth. At each passage, cells were seeded in 25 cm3 flasks, (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) with a density of 2.5 × 105 cells/mL. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 106 cells/well. To allow cells to adhere to well, cells were incubated at 37 °C in a standard CO2 incubator with 5% CO2 for 24 hours before the addition of the gallic acid and synthesized nanoparticles. Then, cells were exposed to treatment for additional 24, 48 and 72 hours after the addition of gallic acid and prepared nanoparticles. In MTT assays, purple formazan crystals are formed by reducing the yellow tetrazolium salt caused by respiratory cells (living cells). The spectrophotometric absorbance was measured at 570 nm, using SpectraMax (M3, Molecular Devices, Washington DC, USA). Cells without treatments with the test reagents were taken as untreated cells with 100% viability, whereby cells with only the RPMI 1640 media were used as a blank45.
The percentage of cell viability was calculated using the formula:
Apoptotic effect of Lee indica fractions, GA and Nano-GA-PLGA
The apoptotic effect of Lee indica fractions, GA and nano-GA-PLGAs was determined using the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labelling (TUNEL) apoptotic detection kit (S7100, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The apoptotic detection kit was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, the experiment was performed in a 6 well plate. The stages of trophozoites of Acanthamoeba triangularis were cultured at a concentration of 106 cells/mL. Parasites were treated with various concentrations of Lee indica fractions, GA and nano-GA-PLGA, which were incubated for 24 hours. Cells without plant extracts, gallic acid and GA-PLGA nanoparticles were used as controls. After 24 hours of incubation period, cells were collected and fixed on silanized slides with 1% paraformaldehyde before the TUNEL assay. This assay is based on the binding of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) and the conjugated drug and peroxidase, converting the substrate, a mixture of hydrogen peroxide and 3’3- diaminobenzidine (DAB) into a brown precipitate. Hence, apoptotic cells form a brown precipitate, detected under a light microscope33.
Statistical analysis
Data were entered, edited and analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software version 21 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation of independent experiments in triplicate. The means were analyzed by Student’s unpaired t-test to estimate the difference between the test sample and the negative and positive control (Chlorhexidine). The difference was considered significant when the p-value was below 0.05 for the student’s unpaired t-test.
Conclusions
In conclusion, our results indicate that the medicinal plant Leea indica and its fractions may provide a new therapeutic agent against infections caused by free living amoebae. The butanol fraction of L. indica is able to induce death in Acanthamoeba cells by apoptotic pathway. Gallic acid, a strong antioxidant, resulted in less cytotoxic agent after being encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles. Hence, nanotechnology can be used as promising new drug delivery system in order to reduce the cytotoxic effect of natural compounds.
Patents
A patent on amoebicidal activity of Leea indica has been filed at The University of Malaya Centre of Innovation and Commercialization (UMCIC), University of Malaya, Malaysia with reference number: SK/P1611/UM/18, 09/07/2018.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Muhammad Nawaz is thankful to Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, for financial support through project no. 2016-093 IRMC. This research was supported by a student grant from University of Malaya (PG088-2015A), FRGS/1/2018/WAB07/UNIM/02/1, The project CICECOAveiro Institute of Materials, FCT Ref. UID/CTM/50011/2019, financed by national funds through the FCT/ MCTES, and The project entitled “Medicinal underexploited Thai native plants against Acanthamoeba, Leishmania donovani, and Plasmodium falciparum – Toward South East Asia collaboration initiative” under The Royal Patronage of Her Royal Highness Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn (Grant No. 040226).
Author contributions
T.M. performed all the laboratory work, analyzed the data and wrote a draft of the paper; M.N. and V.N. conceived the idea, designed the experiments related to nanoparticles and parasitology, overlooked at the laboratory work, reviewed and revised the manuscript; C.S. and S.D.S. designed the experimental part related to cytotoxicity, reviewed the manuscript; T.C. overlooked at the parasitic assays. C.W. designed the experiment related to plant extracts and pure compound used in the study, M.L.P. reviewed and revised the manuscript; All authors approved and agreed for the submission of finalized manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors T.M., C.S.R., T.M., T.T.C., S.D.S., C.W. and V.N. are the inventors of following patent filed at University of Malaya. M.N. and M.L.P. do not have any financial and non financial competing interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Muhammad Nawaz, Email: mnnmuhammad@iau.edu.sa.
Veeranoot Nissapatorn, Email: nissapat@gmail.com.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-65728-0.
References
- 1.Rahman MA, bin Imran T, Islam SJSJOBS. Antioxidative, antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of the phenolics of Leea indica leaf extract. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2013;20:213–225. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Srinivasan G, Ranjith C, Vijayan KJAP. Identification of chemical compounds from the leaves of Leea indica. Acta Pharmaceutica. 2008;58:207–214. doi: 10.2478/v10007-008-0002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khatiwora E, Adsul VB, Kulkarni M, Deshpande N, Kashalkar RJJOPR. Antibacterial activity of Dibutyl Phthalate: A secondary metabolite isolated from Ipomoea carnea stem. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2012;5:150–152. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hsu F-L, Chen P-S, Chang H-T, Chang S-TJIB, Biodegradation Effects of alkyl chain length of gallates on their antifungal property and potency as an environmentally benign preservative against wood-decay fungi. International Biodeterioration Biodegradation. 2009;63:543–547. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nagpal K, Singh SK, Mishra DNJDD. Nanoparticle mediated brain targeted delivery of gallic acid: in vivo behavioral and biochemical studies for improved antioxidant and antidepressant-like activity. Drug delivery. 2012;19:378–391. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2012.738437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tombozara N, et al. Isolation of the gallic acid in the butanolic fraction of Crassula ovata (Mill.) Druce (Crassulaceae) Leaves and its vaso-relaxing effect. Am. J. Innov. Res. Appl. Sci. 2017;4:8. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singh D, et al. Identification of Phytoconstituents in Leea indica (Burm. F.) Merr. Leaves by High Performance Liquid Chromatography Micro Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Molecules. 2019;24:714. doi: 10.3390/molecules24040714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dalu D, Duggirala S, Akarapu SJIJB. Anti-hyperglycemic and hypolipidemic activity of Leea indica. Int J Bioassay. 2014;3:3155–3159. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Prajapati ND, Purohit S, Sharma AK, Kumar T. Agrobios, India, Shyam. Jodhpur: Printing Press; 2003. (Handbook of medicinal plants: a complete source book. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Burkill, I. H. A dictionary of the economic products of the Malay Peninsula, by IH Burkill. With contributions by Willam Birtwistle [and others]. (1966).
- 11.Lattif AG, Omar IM, Said IM, Kadri A. A multi-variate approach to the study of medicinal plants in Malaysia. Journal of Singapore National Academy of Sciences. 1996;13:101–105. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wong, Y. H., Abdul Kadir, H., Ling, S. K. J. E.-B. C. & Medicine, A. Bioassay-guided isolation of cytotoxic cycloartane triterpenoid glycosides from the traditionally used medicinal plant Leea indica. Evidence-Based Complementary Alternative Medicine 2012 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Reddy NS, et al. Phenolic content, antioxidant effect and cytotoxic activity of Leea indica leaves. BMC Complementary Alternative Medicine. 2012;12:128. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bourdy G, Walter AJJOE. Maternity and medicinal plants in Vanuatu I. The cycle of reproduction. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 1992;37:179–196. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(92)90033-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Unschuld, P. U. & Zheng, J. Chinese traditional healing: the Berlin collections of manuscript volumes from the 16th through the early 20th century (3 volume set). Vol. 10 (Brill, 2012).
- 16.Siew Y-Y, et al. Evaluation of anti-proliferative activity of medicinal plants used in Asian Traditional Medicine to treat cancer. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2019;235:75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2018.12.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Benito M, et al. Amebas de vida libre en aguas residuales y fangos: Su papel como reservorio natural de bacterias potencialmente patógenas. Revista de Salud Ambiental. 2018;18:69–77. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Devi, U. & Mahanta, J. J. T. P. Isolation of Acanthamoeba from pond water in Dibrugarh district of Assam: A report. 9, 62–63 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Majid MAA, et al. Pathogenic waterborne free-living amoebae: An update from selected Southeast Asian countries. PloS one. 2017;12:e0169448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Maycock NJ, Jayaswal RJC. Update on Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Cornea. 2016;35:713–720. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Khan NAJEp. Novel in vitro and in vivo models to study central nervous system infections due to Acanthamoeba spp. Experimental parasitology. 2010;126:69–72. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Osato MS, Robinson NM, Wilhelmus KR, Jones DBJROID. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial compounds for cysticidal activity against Acanthamoeba. Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 1991;13:S431–S435. doi: 10.1093/clind/13.supplement_5.s431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rodríguez-Zaragoza S, et al. In vitro evaluation of the amebicidal activity of Buddleia cordata (Loganiaceae, HBK) on several strains of Acanthamoeba. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 1999;66:327–334. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(98)00186-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schuster, F., Dunnebacke, T. & Visvesvara, G. In IXth International Meeting on the Biology and Pathogenicity of Free-Living Amoebae Proceedings. John Libbey Eurotext, Paris, France. 45–48.
- 25.Marciano-Cabral F, Cabral GJCMR. Acanthamoeba spp. as agents of disease in humans. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2003;16:273–307. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.273-307.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gray TB, Gross KA, Cursons RT, Shewan JFJA, Ophthalmology NZJO. Acanthamoeba keratitis: a sobering case and a promising new treatment. Australian New Zealand journal of ophthalmology. 1994;22:73–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1994.tb01700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Murdoch D, Gray TB, Cursons R, Parr DJA, Ophthalmology NZJO. Acanthamoeba keratitis in New Zealand, including two cases with in vivo resistance to polyhexamethylene biguanide. Australian New Zealand journal of ophthalmology. 1998;26:231–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1998.tb01317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tseng S, Lin S, Chen FJC. Is polyhexamethylene biguanide alone effective for Acanthamoeba keratitis? Cornea. 1998;17:345–346. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199805000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lazuana, T., Astuty, H. & Sari, I. P. J. J. O. P. R. Effect of Cellulase Enzyme Treatment on Cyst Wall Degradation of Acanthamoeba sp. Journal of Parasitology Research 2019 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Zhang L, et al. Nanoparticles in medicine: therapeutic applications and developments. Clinical pharmacology therapeutics. 2008;83:761–769. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yadav D, et al. Novel approach: Herbal remedies and natural products in pharmaceutical science as nano drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm Tech. 2011;3:3092–3116. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ansari S, Farha Islam MJJOAPT, Research Influence of nanotechnology on herbal drugs: A Review. Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology. 2012;3:142. doi: 10.4103/2231-4040.101006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mahboob T, et al. Preparation of poly (dl-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles encapsulated with periglaucine A and betulinic acid for in vitro anti-Acanthamoeba and cytotoxicity activities. Pathogens. 2018;7:62. doi: 10.3390/pathogens7030062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nawaz MJJOPID. Nanotechnology-based approaches in pediatric parasitic infections. Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2017;12:264–270. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Alves AdCS, Mainardes RM, Khalil NMJMS, C E. Nanoencapsulation of gallic acid and evaluation of its cytotoxicity and antioxidant activity. Materials Science Engineering. 2016;60:126–134. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fu, X., Ping, Q. & Gao, Y. J. J. O. M. Effects of Formulation Factors on Encapsulation Efficiency and Release Behaviour in vitro of Huperzine A-PLGA Microspheres. 22, 705–714 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 37.Siddiqui R, Khan NAJP, vectors Biology and pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba. Parasites vectors. 2012;5:6. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Srinivasan, G., Sharanappa, P., Leela, N., Sadashiva, C. & Vijayan, K. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Leea indica (Burm. f.) Merr. flowers (2009).
- 39.Chatterjee A, Pakrashi SJNIoS, CSIR C. The Treatise on Indian Medicinal Plants, New Delhi. National Instutute of Science Communication. CSIR. 2011;3:75–78. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jagan S, et al. Antiproliferative potential of gallic acid against diethylnitrosamine-induced rat hepatocellular carcinoma. J Molecular cellular biochemistry. 2008;319:51. doi: 10.1007/s11010-008-9876-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sohi KK, Mittal N, Hundal MK, Khanduja KLJJONS, vitaminology Gallic acid, an antioxidant, exhibits antiapoptotic potential in normal human lymphocytes: a Bcl-2 independent mechanism. Journal of nutritional science vitaminology. 2003;49:221–227. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.49.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li ZJ, et al. Antifungal activity of gallic acid in vitro and in vivo. Phytotherapy research. 2017;31:1039–1045. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Said D, Elsamad L, Gohar YJPR. Validity of silver, chitosan, and curcumin nanoparticles as anti-Giardia agents. J Parasitology research. 2012;111:545–554. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-2866-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Akhtar F, Rizvi MMA, Kar SKJBA. Oral delivery of curcumin bound to chitosan nanoparticles cured Plasmodium yoelii infected mice. Biotechnology advances. 2012;30:310–320. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mahboob T, et al. Acanthamoebicidal activity of periglaucine A and betulinic acid from Pericampylus glaucus (Lam.) Merr. in vitro. Experimental parasitology. 2017;183:160–166. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mahboob T, et al. Anti-encystment and amoebicidal activity of Lonicera japonica Thunb. and its major constituent chlorogenic acid in vitro. Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine. 2016;9:866–871. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Martín-Navarro CM, et al. Statins and voriconazole induce programmed cell death in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Antimicrobial agents chemotherapy. 2015;59:2817–2824. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00066-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Costa P, Lobo JMSJEJOPS. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2001;13:123–133. doi: 10.1016/s0928-0987(01)00095-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wilson B, Samanta MK, Muthu MS, Vinothapooshan GJTD. Design and evaluation of chitosan nanoparticles as novel drug carrier for the delivery of rivastigmine to treat Alzheimer’s disease. Therapeutic delivery. 2011;2:599–609. doi: 10.4155/tde.11.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shi, Y., Wan, A., Shi, Y., Zhang, Y. & Chen, Y. J. B. R. I. Experimental and Mathematical Studies on the Drug Release Properties of Aspirin Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles. 2014 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Masoud MS, Ali AE, Haggag SS, Nasr NMJSAPAM, Spectroscopy B. Spectroscopic studies on gallic acid and its azo derivatives and their iron (III) complexes. Molecular Biomolecular. Spectroscopy. 2014;120:505–511. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.10.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Narasimhan S, Madhavan HNJC. Development and application of an in vitro susceptibility test for Acanthamoeba species isolated from keratitis to polyhexamethylene biguanide and chlorhexidine. Cornea. 2002;21:203–205. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200203000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nakisah M, et al. Anti-amoebic properties of a Malaysian marine sponge Aaptos sp. on Acanthamoeba castellanii. World Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology. 2012;28:1237–1244. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0927-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.