Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Jun 5;33(4):e13524. doi: 10.1111/dth.13524

The impact of hydroxychloroquine shortages on patients with dermatological conditions during COVID‐19 pandemic

Monica Shah 1,, Muskaan Sachdeva 1, Roni P Dodiuk‐Gad 2,3,4
PMCID: PMC7267550  PMID: 32383251

Dear Editor,

In the midst of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the emergency use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQS), stating, “the known and potential benefits of chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate when used to treat COVID‐19 outweigh the known and potential risks of such products.” 1 On March 19, 2020, the President of the United States, Donald Trump, also stated that HCQS could be a “game‐changer” for people with coronavirus without substantial evidence of the drug's efficacy, which led to increased purchasing of nonprescribed HCQS by the public and physicians for personal use, concerns regarding drug supply, and pharmacy shortages. 2 , 3

While recent reports have described the potential consequences of a HCQS shortage on patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), 2 , 4 a shortage of HCQS may also affect patients with dermatological conditions such as dermatomyositis, sarcoidosis, lichen planus, granuloma annulare, polymorphous light eruption, and more, for which HCQS is prescribed under off‐label indications (see Table 1) due to evidence of improvement after use of HCQS. 4 , 5 , 6 For example, Wolverton summarized the improvement of cutaneous sarcoidal granulomas in 17 patients after 4 to 12 weeks of treatment with HCQS 200 to 400 mg daily, among other dermatoses. 5

TABLE 1.

FDA‐approved and off‐label antimalarial indications for dermatological conditions

FDA approved:
  • Lupus erythematous

Off‐label:
Photosensitivity dermatoses:
  • Dermatomyositis
  • Chronic actinic dermatitis
  • Polymorphous light eruption
  • Porphyria cutanea tarda
  • Solar urticaria
Granulomatous dermatoses:
  • Sarcoidosis
  • Granuloma annulare
  • Interstitial granulomatous dermatitis
  • Annular elastolytic giant cell granuloma

Panniculitis:

  • Panniculitis

  • Chronic erythema nodosum

  • Lupus panniculitis

Lymphocytic infiltrates:
  • Lymphocytoma
  • Lymphocytic infiltrate of Jessner
Other dermatoses:
  • Morphea
  • Oral lichen planus
  • Psoriatic arthritis
  • Urticarial vasculitis
  • Chronic ulcerative stomatitis
  • Reticular erythematous mucinosis
  • Pemphigus foliaceus
  • Atopic dermatitis
  • Localized scleroderma
  • Follicular mucinosis

Abbreviation: FDA, Food and Drug Administration.

On April 7, 2020, an article by the Consumer News and Business Channel reported a 21‐year‐old female with dermatomyositis, who has been using HCQS for the past 8 years to reduce her flare‐ups, which would otherwise result in muscle weakness, pain, and her subsequent inability to complete instrumental activities of daily living including schoolwork. 3 The author states that the patient, “describes the possibility that she won't be able to access the drug as ‘terrifying.’ She only has a few more days before she runs out. Her pharmacy, which she contacted last week, is completely out of the medication.” 3

Fortunately, to help combat a potential shortage, on April 7, 2020, the FDA approved an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for HCQS sulfate tablets for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in adults with rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, and chronic discoid lupus erythematous, while excluding the therapeutic and prophylactic use in COVID‐19. 1 This approval will enable multiple suppliers to manufacture HCQS generically.

However, we continue to caution the hoarding of nonprescribed HCQS by the public, as present studies in the literature indicate conflicting findings regarding the efficacy of HCQS. The recent quasi‐randomized comparative study by Barbosa et al, submitted to the New England Journal of Medicine, reported limited benefits and even the increased need for respiratory support escalation after administration of HCQS. 7 In contrast, Gautret et al reported viral load reduction or disappearance in COVID‐19 patients who received 600 mg of HCQS daily, with the effect reinforced upon the addition of azithromycin. 8 Moreover, Conforti et al discuss the possible benefits of HCQS in combination with doxycycline due to doxycycline's well‐defined antibiotic and anti‐inflammatory properties demonstrated for several inflammatory airway diseases. 9 Overall, due to conflicting evidence we hope that further studies and clinical trials with larger sample size will meticulously assess the efficacy of HCQS in COVID‐19, as well as its efficacy in combination with azithromycin or doxycycline.

With inconclusive findings on the efficacy of HCQS in COVID‐19, we emphasize that it is critical for pharmaceutical companies, with cooperation from the public, to ensure that HCQS is not dispensed without prescription, so that this antimalarial is available to patients with dermatological and other conditions for which HCQS has proven benefits. As dermatologists, we need to be aware of the possible HCQS shortages and the subsequent effects on our patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

REFERENCES


Articles from Dermatologic Therapy are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES