Abstract
Biological nitrogen fixation emerging from the symbiosis between bacteria and crop plants holds promise to increase the sustainability of agriculture. One of the biggest hurdles for the engineering of nitrogen‐fixing organisms is an incomplete knowledge of metabolic interactions between microbe and plant. In contrast to the previously assumed supply of only succinate, we describe here the CATCH‐N cycle as a novel metabolic pathway that co‐catabolizes plant‐provided arginine and succinate to drive the energy‐demanding process of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in endosymbiotic rhizobia. Using systems biology, isotope labeling studies and transposon sequencing in conjunction with biochemical characterization, we uncovered highly redundant network components of the CATCH‐N cycle including transaminases that interlink the co‐catabolism of arginine and succinate. The CATCH‐N cycle uses N2 as an additional sink for reductant and therefore delivers up to 25% higher yields of nitrogen than classical arginine catabolism—two alanines and three ammonium ions are secreted for each input of arginine and succinate. We argue that the CATCH‐N cycle has evolved as part of a synergistic interaction to sustain bacterial metabolism in the microoxic and highly acid environment of symbiosomes. Thus, the CATCH‐N cycle entangles the metabolism of both partners to promote symbiosis. Our results provide a theoretical framework and metabolic blueprint for the rational design of plants and plant‐associated organisms with new properties to improve nitrogen fixation.
Keywords: biological nitrogen fixation, Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens, CATCH‐N cycle, Sinorhizobium meliloti, TnSeq
Subject Categories: Metabolism; Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction; Plant Biology
This study challenges the current model of nitrogen exchange in rhizobia‐legumes symbiosis and describes the CATCH‐N cycle, which operates on the provision of arginine and succinate by the plant as part of a metabolic network driving symbiotic nitrogen fixation in rhizobia.
Introduction
Nitrogen is a fundamental element of all living organisms and the primary nutrient that impacts crop yield (Socolow, 1999). Despite being highly abundant in the atmosphere, plants can only assimilate nitrogen in reduced forms such as ammonium. More than 125 megatons of nitrogen are fixed annually by the industrial Haber–Bosch process into ammonium and applied to increase agricultural crop production (Graham & Vance, 2000). Endosymbiosis between legumes and soil bacteria termed rhizobia is capable to fix nitrogen biologically. On a global scale, anthropogenic nitrogen delivered to the environment surpasses annual supplies by natural biological nitrogen fixation on land (Gruber & Galloway, 2008) leading to serious environmental impacts from climate change to the disruption of eco‐systems and pollution of coastal waters.
Improving the ability of plants and plant‐associated organisms to fix atmospheric nitrogen has inspired biotechnology for decades (Beatty & Good, 2011; Bhardwaj et al, 2014; Gupta et al, 2015), not only for the apparent economic and ecological benefit that comes with the replacement of chemical fertilizers but also more recently for opportunities toward more sustainable agriculture and the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. To catalyze atmospheric nitrogen fixation, rhizobia use a specific enzyme termed nitrogenase. Attempts to transfer and improve nitrogenase genes clusters have to date focused largely on organisms such as Escherichia coli (Dixon & Postgate, 1972; Wang et al, 2013). More recently, the emerging field of synthetic biology provides an alternative approach to engineer designer nitrogenase gene clusters in bacteria (Temme et al, 2012; Li et al, 2016; Burén et al, 2018; Yang et al, 2018). Despite these promising results, engineered organisms based on heterologous expression of nitrogenase genes have not yet come close to the efficiency of natural rhizobia–legume symbiosis systems (Beatty & Good, 2011; Good, 2018). While the molecular mechanism of the nitrogenase reaction has been resolved with atomistic detail (Hoffman et al, 2009, 2014; Seefeldt et al, 2009; Sippel & Einsle, 2017), the precise nature of metabolic interactions between plants and bacteria to sustain the energy‐intensive process of nitrogen fixation has remained an open question.
The current model of nutrient exchange in rhizobia–legume symbiosis postulates that, in exchange for fixed nitrogen, the plant provides C4‐dicarboxylic acids such as succinate, which is metabolized through the tri‐carboxylic acid (TCA) cycle to generate ATP and reduction equivalents needed for the nitrogenase reaction (Watson et al, 1988; Yurgel & Kahn, 2004; Clarke et al, 2014). However, multiple lines of evidence argue against a simple exchange of succinate for ammonium during symbiosis (Udvardi & Kahn, 1993; Kahn et al, 1985). The nitrogenase is highly sensitive to oxygen, which irreversibly inactivates the enzyme. While the microoxic environment encountered by rhizobia inside root nodules promotes nitrogenase activity, it also inhibits the catabolism of succinate through the TCA cycle. This is because increases in NADH and NADPH levels inhibit key enzymes of the TCA cycle including citrate synthase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, and 2‐oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, a process termed redox inhibition (Dunn, 1998; Prell & Poole, 2006). Thus, the TCA cycle probably operates below its full aerobic potential. Furthermore, if the metabolism of symbiotic nitrogen‐fixing bacteria is based exclusively on the provision of succinate, then the bacterial nitrogen requirement must be covered solely by the nitrogenase reaction. However, nitrogen‐fixing root‐nodule bacteria (termed bacteroids) do not self‐assimilate but rather secrete large quantities of ammonium (Bergersen & Turner, 1967; Brown & Dilworth, 1975; Udvardi & Poole, 2013) suggesting that the plant provides the bacteroids with a nitrogen‐containing nutrient to cover their nitrogen needs. Finally, the degradation product of succinate through a fully operational TCA cycle is carbon dioxide. However, it has been reported that nitrogen‐fixing bacteroids also secrete the amino acids alanine and aspartate (Kretovich et al, 1986; Waters et al, 1998; Allaway et al, 2000) suggesting a partially operating TCA cycle to yield alanine or aspartate.
Based on metabolic considerations of inefficient TCA cycle operation under microaerobic conditions, the inability of bacteroids to self‐assimilate nitrogen, and evidence for secretion of alanine or aspartate by nitrogen‐fixing bacteroids, we postulated a nitrogen‐containing nutrient that is plant‐provided in addition to dicarboxylic acids. Since the plant must provide the N‐containing compound in sufficient quantities, we reasoned that an amino acid might be a likely candidate. Based on the finding that nitrogen‐fixing bacteroids utilize succinate and secrete the amino acids alanine and aspartate (Kretovich et al, 1986; Waters et al, 1998; Allaway et al, 2000; Day et al, 2001), we concluded that the plant‐provided compound must comprise at least two nitrogen atoms to enable two consecutive transamination reactions. The first nitrogen is used for transamination of the ketoacid derived from succinate while the second nitrogen atom is utilized for transamination of the ketoacid derived from the plant‐provided compound.
Six out of the twenty natural amino acids (Arg, His, Lys, Gln, Asn, and Trp) contain two or more nitrogen atoms and thus are likely candidates. Thereof, His, Lys, and Gln can be excluded because their degradation involves a compulsory 2‐oxoglutarate dehydrogenase step, which is subjected to redox inhibition and disfavored under microoxic conditions (Salminen & Streeter, 1990, 1992). Furthermore, we also excluded Trp and Asn because their catabolism enters the TCA cycle at the level of pyruvate and oxaloacetate, respectively, which limits energy metabolism within a partially operating TCA cycle. Based on these theoretical considerations, we postulated that the remaining amino acid arginine is a likely candidate for the nitrogen‐containing compound provided upon symbiosis.
Here, we report on the CATCH‐N cycle based on the co‐catabolism of plant‐provided arginine and succinate as part of a specific metabolic network to sustain symbiotic nitrogen fixation as a synergistic interaction. Using 13C and 15N isotope tracing experiment in Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens in conjunction with in planta transposon‐sequencing analyses and enzymatic reaction network characterization in Sinorhizobium meliloti, we uncovered the principle of the metabolic inter‐species interaction leading to the nitrogen‐fixing symbiosis between plants and bacteria. Collectively, we demonstrate that the CATCH‐N metabolism is governed by highly redundant functions comprised of at least 10 transporter systems and 23 enzymatic functions. In sum, our systems‐level findings provide the theoretical framework and enzymatic blueprint for the optimization and redesign of improved symbiotic nitrogen‐fixing organisms.
Results
The co‐feeding of arginine and succinate stimulates nitrogenase activity
To probe whether arginine functions as co‐substrate to drive symbiotic nitrogen fixation, we assayed nitrogenase activity of mature bacteroids from B. diazoefficiens (strain 110 spc4) and S. meliloti (strain CL 150) in the presence of nodule crude extracts and upon supplementation of succinate and arginine (Materials and Methods). The addition of nodule crude extracts to isolated bacteroids resulted in strong stimulation of nitrogenase activity (Fig 1A), supporting the idea that plant‐provided nutrients are necessary for symbiotic nitrogen fixation. While the stimulation of nitrogenase only poorly occurred in the presence of succinate as the sole nutrient, we found that the addition of arginine stimulated nitrogenase activity in B. diazoefficiens and S. meliloti by 46% ± 4% and 116% ± 2%, respectively, as compared to nodule extracts (Appendix Table S1). The co‐feeding of arginine in combination with succinate restored nitrogenase activity to the same extent as nodule extracts (91% ± 6% and 92% ± 6%) for B. diazoefficiens (Fig 1A) and S. meliloti bacteroids, respectively. Furthermore, adding solely malate or co‐supplementing malate and arginine inhibited or only poorly stimulated the nitrogenase activity in isolated B. diazoefficiens bacteroids (−20% ± 5%, and 9% ± 4%, Fig 1A, Appendix Table S1). Therefore, we concluded that the co‐feeding of arginine and succinate is sufficient to stimulate nitrogenase activity in bacteroids.
Figure 1. The co‐feeding of arginine and succinate promotes nitrogen fixation and ATP production in isolated bacteroids.
- Substrate‐dependent nitrogenase activity, measured through reduction of acetylene into ethylene, in isolated B. diazoefficiens bacteroids upon supplementation of malate, succinate, arginine, and nodule extract. Data represent the mean and standard error of the mean of at least eight independent replicates.
- Fold change in intracellular ATP level in isolated B. diazoefficiens bacteroids upon supplementation of succinate, arginine, and nodule extract. The values obtained for each of the four individual measurements (points) together with the regression trajectory of each experiment are shown.
Source data are available online for this figure.
The nitrogenase enzyme complex catalyzes one of the most energy‐consuming enzymatic reactions found in nature with 16 ATP molecules and 8 low‐potential (“high‐energy”) electrons required for the reduction of a single nitrogen molecule. Nitrogenase is irreversibly inactivated in the presence of oxygen, which restricts the reduction of atmospheric nitrogen to low‐oxygen conditions. Thus, to support nitrogen fixation, bacteroids must produce substantial amounts of ATP under microoxic conditions. The finding that succinate as the sole nutrient did not result in nitrogenase stimulation suggested that succinate catabolism via the TCA cycle does likely not generate sufficient ATP to support efficient nitrogenase reaction.
To measure the ATP level produced in isolated B. diazoefficiens bacteroids, we quantified the increase in intracellular ATP through ATP‐dependent luciferase assays (Materials and Methods). In agreement with the absence of an operational TCA cycle, we observed that the addition of succinate alone failed to stimulate ATP production. In contrast, we found that co‐feeding of succinate together with arginine caused an increase from 1.53 ± 0.04 to 4.03 ± 0.09 attomole ATP per cell corresponding to a 2.61 ± 0.03‐fold increase in intracellular ATP levels (Fig 1B). In sum, these findings demonstrate that co‐catabolism of arginine and succinate supports biological nitrogen fixation in vitro in B. diazoefficiens and S. meliloti.
Isotope tracing experiments reveal the presence of three parallel arginine degradation pathways
To gain further insights into the bacteroid metabolism and possible routes of arginine degradation operating during nitrogen fixation, we performed stable isotope labeling studies with B. diazoefficiens. We incubated isolated bacteroids under stringent microoxic conditions with 13C arginine in the presence of unlabeled succinate and quantified isotope labeling pattern of arginine degradation intermediates by LC‐MS/MS (Table 1). Upon the addition of 13C arginine, we observed a rapid increase in the labeled intracellular arginine pool (99.43% 13C), demonstrating active arginine transport into nitrogen‐fixing bacteroids.
Table 1.
Arginine catabolism in Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens bacteroids fed with 13C arginine and unlabeled succinate
Metabolite | Fractional labeling (%)a |
---|---|
Arginine (ARG) | 99.43 ± 0.10 |
Citrulline (CIT) | 60.22 ± 5.26 |
Ornithine (ORN) | 81.25 ± 5.01 |
Proline (PRO) | 23.19 ± 3.58 |
Glutamate (GLU) | 7.67 ± 0.82 |
4‐guanidinobutanoate (GBA) | 90.40 ± 3.03 |
4‐aminobutanoate (GABA) | 6.26 ± 1.06 |
13C Fractional labeling after 150 min incubation with 13C L‐ arginine. Shown are the average and the standard error of the mean (SEM).
Upon further incubation, we found 13C isotope labels in key intermediates of multiple arginine degradation pathways steadily increasing. After 150 min, ornithine, proline, and glutamate, the intermediates of the classical arginase‐mediated degradation pathway, were labeled to 81.25%, 23.19%, and 7.67% 13C (Table 1). In addition, we found that citrulline, which represents the first step of the arginine deiminase pathway, was labeled to 60.22% 13C. The presence of an arginine deiminase pathway in isolated bacteroids is in agreement with the previously proposed enzymatic production of ATP by the enzyme carbamate kinase (Dunn, 2015).
Furthermore, we also observed fractional labeling of 90.40% for 4‐guanidinobutanoate and 6.26% for 4‐aminobutanoate (GABA), suggesting the presence of a functional arginine transaminase pathway operating in bacteroids (Table 1) that yields alanine or aspartate. The observation that bacteroids possess an arginine transamination pathway was intriguing because it provides a functional link between arginine degradation and alanine or aspartate secretion, which was previously reported as part of the metabolite exchange occurring during symbiotic nitrogen fixation (Day et al, 2001). In agreement with this hypothesis, upon incubation of isolated bacteroids under stringent microoxic conditions with 15N arginine, we observed fractional labeling of aspartate of 90.34% (Appendix Fig S1). These findings suggest that at least three independent arginine degradation pathways operate simultaneously in nitrogen‐fixing B. diazoefficiens bacteroids causing release of ammonium independent from the nitrogenase reaction.
Transposon sequencing reveals symbiosis genes involved in the uptake and catabolism of arginine
To gain further insights into the gene sets and enzymatic functions responsible for uptake and degradation of arginine, we conducted a functional genetic screen in planta using transposon sequencing (TnSeq; van Opijnen et al, 2009; Christen et al, 2011). TnSeq measures genome‐wide changes in transposon insertion abundance prior and after subjecting large mutant populations to selection regimes (Christen et al, 2016) and allows systems‐level definition of conditional essential gene sets for a given environment (Ochsner et al, 2017; Québatte et al, 2017). We reasoned that TnSeq provides a unique opportunity to identify specific metabolic pathways including arginine transport and degradation genes that become essential upon engagement in symbiosis.
We choose S. meliloti‐Medicago truncatula as the rhizobia–legume symbiosis system, because supernodulating M. truncatula lss plants (Schnabel et al, 2010) provided a high frequency of nodules increasing the resolution of the TnSeq analysis. In total, we infected 4,500 M. truncatula lss plants with a high‐density S. meliloti transposon mutant library of 750,128 unique Tn5 insertions (Fig 2A, Dataset EV1, Materials and Methods). Six weeks post‐inoculation, we recovered 99,623 unique Tn5 mutants from 375,000 root nodules (Dataset EV2). By comparing the TnSeq dataset obtained from in planta infection assays and input transposon mutant libraries, we mapped a set of 977 symbiosis genes corresponding to 15.71% of the tripartite 6.7‐megabase (Mb) genome (Dataset EV3, Materials and Methods). A gene is classed as a symbiosis gene when the fractional representation in the library recovered from nodules is significantly less that the fractional representation in the original library (Dataset EV3, Materials and Methods), implying that strains carrying the mutation do not prosper in nodules. Among the identified 977 symbiosis genes, 435 genes were located on the chromosome, 295 on pSymA, and 247 on pSymB indicating that all three replicons of S. meliloti contribute to symbiotic nitrogen fixation (Fig 2B).
Figure 2. The symbiosis genome of S. meliloti revealed by transposon sequencing (TnSeq).
- Schematic representation of the plant infection screen that was used to map the S. meliloti symbiosis genome. Tn5 transposon mutant pools were selected for their ability to establish symbiosis with M. truncatula. After selection, Tn5 mutants recovered from root nodules were identified by TnSeq.
- Genome map visualizing the distribution of essential symbiosis genes among the three S. meliloti replicons. Symbiosis genes are plotted as lines on the chromosome (gray) and the mega‐plasmids pSymA (blue) and pSymB (green).
- Functional classification of essential symbiosis genes located on the chromosome (gray), pSymA (blue), and pSymB (green).
Source data are available online for this figure.
Functional classification revealed that the large majority of symbiosis genes comprise cellular functions such as metabolism (507 genes, 51.89%), gene regulation (196 genes, 20.06%), and other cellular processes (228 genes, 23.34%; Fig 2C, Dataset EV4, Materials and Methods). The identified gene set included well‐characterized symbiosis factors involved in nodulation (34 genes, 3.48%) as well as functions associated with the nitrogenase enzyme complex (12 genes, 1.23%). Collectively, a set of 177 symbiosis genes, corresponding to over one‐third of the 507 metabolic symbiosis genes (34.91%), was associated with nitrogen metabolism including genes for the transport (59 genes), biosynthesis (78 genes), and degradation (40 genes) of amino acids and other nitrogen‐containing compounds. While only 3 out of 78 essential biosynthesis genes (3.85%) were involved in the synthesis of arginine, we found a large fraction of 18 out of 59 essential transport genes (30.51%) and 22 out of 40 essential catabolic genes (55.00%) annotated as being involved in the uptake and catabolism of arginine and its derivatives. In sum, these findings from in planta TnSeq analysis highlight that the provision of arginine and its consecutive degradation is of fundamental importance to drive symbiotic nitrogen fixation in planta.
TnSeq identifies multiple arginine transport systems mediating acid tolerance
Among the 18 transport genes essential for symbiosis, we found two putative arginine and four putrescine ABC transport systems that we named artABCDE (SMc03124‐28) for arginine transporter; satABC (SMa2195‐97) for symbiotic arginine transporter; and potFGHI (SMc00770‐3), potABCD2 (SMa0799‐803), potABCD3 (SMa0951‐3), and potABCD4 (SMa2203‐9) for the putrescine uptake systems (Dataset EV3). In addition, two arginine/agmatine antiporter genes adiC (SMa0684) and adiC2 (SMa1668) encoded on pSymA were also essential during symbiosis (Dataset EV3). Interestingly, the identified transport systems participate in urease reactions and arginine deiminase pathways that mediate acid tolerance. Cross‐comparing expression profiles using previously published RNA‐seq datasets (Roux et al, 2014), we found that artABCDE was the only transport system to be constitutively expressed during all stages of symbiosis, while the expression of all other transporters was specifically induced during development into nitrogen‐fixing compartments (symbiosomes).
To gain further insights, we searched for additional symbiosis genes related to acid tolerance and indeed found multiple essential components in the TnSeq dataset (Dataset EV3). From the urease pathway, we identified two arginase genes argI1 (SMc03091) and argI2 (SMa1711) and the urease gene ureA (SMc01941) and ureE (SMc01832). From the arginine deiminase system, we found the arcABC operon (SMa0693, SMa0695, SMa0697) to be essential for symbiosis. Both systems catalyze the conversion of arginine into ornithine leading to the production of ammonia as part of the acid tolerance mechanism. Furthermore, the arginine deiminase system also provides ATP via the enzymatic step of ornithine carbamoyltransferase arcB (Cunin et al, 1986). Interestingly, two additional copies of ornithine carbamoyltransferase were also essential (argF1, encoded by SMc02137, and arcB2, encoded by SM_b20472), emphasizing the importance of genetic redundancy in arginine deiminase‐dependent ATP synthesis during symbiosis. The urease and arginine deiminase acid tolerance mechanisms rely on the efflux of ammonium (Marquis et al, 1987). Indeed, the ammonium efflux pump encoded by amtB (SMc03807) was among the top‐ranked symbiosis genes. These findings underscore the importance of ammonium secretion as a compulsive property of bacteroids independent of the nitrogenase reaction.
Arginase gene deletions show nitrogen starvation phenotypes during plant infection assays
To validate the importance of the identified arginine‐dependent acid tolerance systems for symbiosis, we constructed a panel of deletion mutants of the urease and arginine deiminase pathways and assessed nitrogen starvation phenotypes during plant infection assays (Materials and Methods, Fig 3D, Appendix Table S2). Out of the 8 mutants evaluated, all displayed symbiotic defects. On the level of the arginine transport systems, we found that artABCDE and satABC showed a reduction in nitrogenase activity of 47.06% ± 7.27% and 55.45% ± 10.99%. Similarly, gene deletions in the urease pathway such as the arginase mutants argI1 and argI2 exhibited a reduction of 71.18% ± 5.21% and 70.97 ± 5.16% for single deletions and 80.89% ± 3.15% for the double deletion mutant. Deletion of the urease ureGFE and the ammonium efflux system amtB resulted in a 64.68% ± 5.50% and 80.90% ± 4.81% reduction in nitrogenase activity.
Figure 3. Assessment of nitrogen starvation phenotypes of M. truncatula upon infection with S. meliloti mutants impaired in arginine transport and catabolism.
- The aerial part of M. truncatula upon infection with S. meliloti ∆argI1, ∆argI2, ∆argI1,2 and the dicarboxylate transport mutant ∆dctAB were smaller than those inoculated with the wild‐type strain, highlighting the importance of arginine catabolism for nitrogen fixation.
- Cross sections of nodules bearing S. meliloti WT or arginine catabolism mutant ∆argI1, ∆argI2 reveals the yellowish color of non‐functional nodules induced by the ∆argI1 ∆argI2 double deletion mutant.
- Bacteroid ultrastructure across nodule sections determined by scanning electron microscopy indicates the presence of hollow nodules with aberrant cell morphology in the ∆argI1 ∆argI2 double deletion mutant defective in arginine catabolism.
- Nitrogenase activity in M. truncatula nodules inoculated with S. meliloti strains defective in arginine catabolism. Data points are the mean of at least 30 plants measured after 8 weeks post‐inoculation; error bars indicate standard error of the mean.
Source data are available online for this figure.
Plants inoculated with the argI1, argI2 single and double deletion mutant harbored a typical phenotype of nitrogen starvation. The aerial part of infected plants was smaller than those inoculated with WT strain (Figs 3A and EV1). Nodules induced by the argI1, argI2 double deletion mutant displayed the yellowish color of non‐functional M. truncatula nodules (Fig 3B). Furthermore, observations of argI1, argI2 nodule sections by scanning electron microscopy showed that nodules were hollow and remaining bacteroids exhibit aberrant cell morphology (Fig 3C, Appendix Fig S2). Collectively, our results suggest that the identified arginine‐dependent acid tolerance system is a prerequisite for the faithful establishment of symbiosis.
Figure EV1. Symbiotic defects of S. meliloti mutants impaired in arginine catabolism.
- Phenotype of M. truncatula lss plants inoculated with S. meliloti WT.
- Phenotype of M. truncatula lss plants inoculated with S. meliloti double deletion mutant ∆argI1, ∆argI2.
- Root‐nodule phenotype of M. truncatula lss plants inoculated with S. meliloti WT.
- Root‐nodule phenotype of M. truncatula lss plants inoculated with S. meliloti double deletion mutant ∆argI1, ∆argI2.
Identification of AspC as an arginine:pyruvate transaminase
In our isotope labeling studies with bacteroids, we detected fractional labeling of 90.40% for 4‐guanidinobutanoate (Table 1) suggesting the presence of a functional arginine transamination pathway. However, in the S. meliloti genome, corresponding genes have not been assigned. Among the essential symbiosis genes identified by our TnSeq analysis (Dataset EV3), we found aspC (SMc02262) annotated as an aspartate transaminase, which is specifically expressed in nitrogen‐fixing bacteroids (Roux et al, 2014). We constructed a clean deletion mutant of aspC and found that the absence of AspC indeed causes a nitrogen starvation phenotype during plant infection assays (Materials and Methods). The aerial part of plants infected with the aspC deletion mutant were smaller than those inoculated with wild‐type strain, and nitrogenase activity was reduced by 50.91% ± 9.00% (Fig 3D, Appendix Table S2) highlighting the importance of aspC for nitrogen fixation.
AspC shares 40% sequence homology to AruH, the arginine:pyruvate transaminase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Yang & Lu, 2007a,b). When we characterized the enzymatic properties of AspC by mass spectrometry, we found transaminase activity to pyruvate from arginine, agmatine, ornithine, and putrescine (Appendix Table S3) to yield alanine. Enzyme studies with ilvB1 (SMc02263), the gene encoded downstream of aspC, further provided evidence that the S. meliloti arginine transamination pathway differs from P. aeruginosa. Sequence homology with AruI from P. aeruginosa suggested that IlvB1 is a 5‐guanidino‐2‐oxopentanoate decarboxylase. However, assays with purified IlvB1 revealed that the S. meliloti enzyme has sevenfold higher decarboxylase activity with 5‐amino‐oxopentanoate. We concluded that both AspC and IlvB1 are promiscuous enzymes accepting multiple substrates. Although aspC was among the symbiosis genes, the deletion mutant retained partial nitrogenase activity. Also, ilvB1 was not present within the group of symbiosis genes. This suggests that genetic redundancies among transaminase and decarboxylase genes exist and partially mask mutant phenotypes complicating the genetic identification of additional network components.
At least 16 redundant enzymes participate in the arginine transamination network
To further dissect possible redundant components, we performed a functional homology search for enzyme candidates known to be expressed during the nitrogen‐fixing bacteroid stage. Conversion from arginine into succinate proceeds by a series of six consecutive enzymatic reaction steps. The four steps upstream of GABA comprise transamination, decarboxylation, ureohydrolase, and dehydrogenase reactions. In the lower part of the reaction network, a linear pathway through transamination and subsequent dehydrogenase steps leads from GABA to succinate (Fig 4A).
Figure 4. Reaction scheme, enzyme profiling, and reconstitution of the catabolic arginine transamination network operating in nitrogen‐fixing bacteroids.
- Schematic representation of the arginine transamination reaction network that leads from arginine to succinate. Enzymatic reaction steps are indicated by arrows and annotated with corresponding enzyme commission (EC) numbers. Leftward facing dotted arrows represent ureohydrolase, rightward facing dashed arrows decarboxylases, downward‐pointing solid arrows aminotransferases, and dashed and dotted arrows dehydrogenase enzyme reaction steps. The names of the metabolites are indicated above their chemical structures according to the following abbreviations: arginine (ARG), ornithine (ORN), 5‐guanidino‐2‐oxopentanoate (GOP), agmatine (AGM), 5‐amino‐oxopentanoate (AOP), putrescine (PUT), 4‐guanidinobutyraldehyde (GBL), 4‐aminobutyraldehyde (ABL), 4‐guanidinobutanoate (GBA), 4‐aminobutanoate (GABA), succinic semialdehyde (SSA), and succinate (SUCC).
- Heat map representing enzymatic activities participating in the arginine transamination network with relative enzyme activities highlighted as a color map (Appendix Tables S4–S7). Rows are annotated on the left with the abbreviated names of the substrates and on the right with the corresponding EC numbers. Columns are annotated by corresponding enzyme names.
- Recombinant enzymes involved in arginine catabolism were combined into a single reaction mixture using arginine and pyruvate as substrates. Substrate (S) consumption into the products (P) succinate and alanine, including their intermediates (I1,I2), was determined along the time series using LC‐MS/MS.
- The relative metabolite abundance along the reaction time‐course is highlighted as a color map (Appendix Table S8).
Source data are available online for this figure.
Upon heterologous expression and protein purification, we determined substrate specificity and biochemically profiled a panel of 16 candidate enzymes. In addition to the arginine deiminases ArcA1 and ArcA2 and the arginase ArgI1, we found two agmatinase ArgI2 and SpeB, and one ureohydrolase SpeB2 acting on 4‐guanidinobutyraldehyde, 5‐guanidino‐2‐oxopentanoate, and 4‐guanidinobutanoate (Fig 4B, Appendix Table S4). The highest level of pathway redundancy resides on the level of dehydrogenases. Besides the five known GabD1‐5 proteins from S. meliloti, we identified four additional isoenzymes Gab6‐9 (Appendix Table S5). Thereof GabD6 and GabD7 share a dehydrogenase profile identical to GabD1 for 4‐aminobutyraldehyde, succinic semialdehyde, and 4‐guanidinobutyraldehyde while GabD8 and GabD9 exhibited substrate specificity for 4‐guanidinobutyraldehyde (Fig 4B, Appendix Table S5).
Furthermore, on the level of pyruvate transaminases, we identified three additional enzymes DatA, AatB, and ArgD that exhibited substrate preferences for ornithine, putrescine, and agmatine and two enzymes GabT2 and GabT3 with preferences for GABA (Fig 4B, Appendix Table S6). Similarly, we also profiled two additional decarboxylase enzymes OdcA and OdcB that either catalyzed the decarboxylation of ornithine or 5‐amino‐oxopentanoate (Fig 4B, Appendix Table S7). Collectively, these results demonstrate the presence of a highly redundant network mediating arginine catabolism in S. meliloti.
Synthetic reconstitution of the arginine transamination network that operates in nitrogen‐fixing bacteroids
We reconstituted the reaction system in vitro from a set of 14 enzymes and followed the conversion of arginine and pyruvate by mass spectrometry (Fig 4C, Appendix Table S8, Materials and Methods). We observed that 90% of the arginine was rapidly metabolized within 30 min. As expected, ornithine and 5‐guanidino‐2‐oxopentanoate appeared as the first intermediates and then concomitantly decreased with the appearance of the second level of intermediates putrescine, 5‐amino‐oxopentanoate, and 4‐aminobutyraldehyde that ultimately converted into GABA, succinic semialdehyde, and succinate. During the process, alanine steadily increased demonstrating that pyruvate transamination couples the conversion of arginine into succinate (Fig 4D, Appendix Table S8). In sum, these findings demonstrate the synthetic reconstruction of the transamination network that permits the co‐catabolism of arginine and succinate.
The catabolism of succinate and arginine is interlinked
Since the arginine transamination network consumes two equivalents of pyruvate but generates only a single equivalent during its operation, we reasoned that the network strictly depends on the provision of additional pyruvate, which must be formed by simultaneous co‐catabolism of succinate. We concluded that the degradation of arginine and succinate is mutually coupled and can only take place if plants provide both nutrients in equal stoichiometries. Indeed, single deletion in the succinate transporter DctAB abrogates succinate uptake and thereby also prevents the co‐catabolism of arginine, resulting in a fix minus phenotype. On the other hand, the uptake of arginine is controlled by multiple redundant transporters. Nevertheless, single deletions in artABCDE and satAB arginine transporter show a partial symbiosis phenotype. Thus, transamination enforces a strict co‐catabolism of succinate and arginine but also provides an elegant solution to maintain a partial TCA cycle under stringent microoxic and acidic conditions. We termed the entangled catabolic network CATCH‐N cycle for C4‐dicarboxylate arginine transamination co‐catabolism under acidic (H+) conditions to fix nitrogen (Fig 5).
Figure 5. Model of the CATCH‐N cycle operating in N2‐fixing bacteroids.
Arginine (blue) and succinate (brown) are co‐feed to bacteroids in equimolar ratio. Co‐catabolism is interlinked through an arginine–pyruvate transamination step yielding alanine. Alternatively, an arginine–oxaloacetate transamination step yields aspartate. Enzymatic conversion of arginine releases ammonium (blue) independent from the nitrogenase reaction (green). NADH (magenta) produced through the co‐catabolism is regenerated over a bifurcated electron transport chain onto terminal acceptors oxygen and nitrogen.
A bifurcated electron transport chain operates during nitrogen fixation
We reasoned that the operation of the CATCH‐N cycle provides significant amounts of NADH as well as QH2. Under aerobic conditions, NADH is regenerated by the electron transport chain, which includes proton‐pumping enzymes known as complexes I, III, and IV. However, upon symbiosome acidification, the driving force of complex I is likely no longer sufficient to sustain proton translocation against the increased pH gradient impairing the conversion of NADH into QH2. Also, oxygen partial pressure within symbiosomes is too low to operate the aerobic version of complex IV and bacteroids induce expression of a high‐affinity cytochrome cbb3 oxidase complex FixNOQP1‐3 (Preisig et al, 1993; Nellen‐Anthamatten et al, 1998; Buschmann et al, 2010). Recently, the electron bifurcating FixABCX protein complex has been proposed to serve as the alternative entry point for low‐potential (“high‐energy”) electrons from NADH (Ledbetter et al, 2017; Buckel & Thauer, 2018), thereby bypassing the impaired complex I. Electron bifurcation splits an electron pair into a endergonic and an exergonic redox reaction to yield a high and a low‐potential electron (Müller et al, 2018).
Based on these findings, we devised a model to restore electron flow from NADH to QH2 by electron bifurcation to nitrogenase and the high‐affinity terminal oxidase (Fig 5). If this is the main pathway that permits regeneration of NADH, then all components must be essential in symbiosis. Indeed, we found genes encoding for components of the nitrogenase nifHDK (SMa0825, SMa0827, SMa0829), the electron bifurcation complex fixABCX (SMa0816, SMa0817, SMa0819, SMa0822), and the alternative complex IV fixNOQP1‐3 among the top‐ranked symbiosis genes in the TnSeq dataset (Dataset EV3). These genetic evidences support a model in which the CATCH‐N cycle is interlinked with a bifurcated electron transport chain to permit nitrogen‐fixing symbiosis.
Estimation of the ATP balance of the bifurcated electron transport chain
The endergonic branch of the electron bifurcation reaction generates low‐potential reducing equivalents in the form of flavodoxin hydroquinone (Fldhq) for nitrogenase catalysis (Fig 5). For every Fldhq, the nitrogenase consumes two additional ATP molecules. However, the exergonic branch of the electron bifurcation reaction translocates only three protons corresponding to a single ATP that is generated per electron passing from QH2 to coenzyme Q onto oxygen. Thus, the electron bifurcation of each NADH appears to be associated with a net loss of one ATP. In addition to NADH, the CATCH‐N cycle also provides QH2 via succinate dehydrogenase (Fig 5). Thereby, up to two ATP are generated per QH2 passing its electrons onto oxygen. Accordingly, a bifurcated electron transport chain in combination with an active succinate dehydrogenase complex delivers a net gain in ATP, provided that catabolism generates NADH to QH2 in a 2:1 ratio. Contrary to this criterion, the complete TCA operating with malate or succinate provides a higher ratio of NADH to QH2 of 5:1 and 5:2 and, thus, inevitably results in a net loss of ATP.
In addition to proton‐motive force‐dependent ATP synthesis, several metabolic cycles including the CATCH‐N and TCA provide additional ATP through enzyme‐coupled synthesis. Furthermore, proton gradients are not exclusively generated by the proton expelling complexes of the electron transport chain, but moreover can also be established through proton‐consuming enzymatic reactions in the cytosol, including the production of ammonia and decarboxylation reactions implemented in the CATCH‐N cycle. Based on these considerations, we calculated the net proton consumption for several theoretical nitrogen fixation cycles (CATCH_N1‐4) that start with arginine and succinate and feature dedicated transamination reactions that channel the TCA products pyruvate and oxaloacetate into the corresponding amino acids alanine and aspartate (Appendix). In addition to previously annotated pathways (Zhao et al, 2012), these theoretical nitrogen fixation cycles also integrated all enzymatic activities of the arginine transamination network identified during our biochemical enzyme studies. To evaluate the feasibility of these theoretical cycles, we estimated the net gain in ATP per N2 molecule converted. Our calculations show that in terms of ATP production, the CATCH‐N cycles are generally more energy‐efficient than a stand‐alone TCA cycle operating on succinate or malate (Table 2, Appendix) and were also more energy‐efficient than the core sequence of other naturally existing arginine degradation pathways, such as the arginine–pyruvate–glutamate super‐pathway (Appendix). As an example, two of our CATCH‐N cycles generated on average over 18‐fold more ATP per N2 converted into ammonia as compared to the core sequence of the TCA cycle operating with succinate as the sole substrate. In sum, these calculations establish a new conceptional framework to understand and engineer symbiotic nitrogen‐fixing organisms with future perspectives for agriculture.
Table 2.
Comparison of selected metabolic pathways for N2 fixation
Pathway | Substrates | Products | Reaction steps | Sum NADH | Sum QH2 | O2 consumed per N2 | Influx H+ | ATP net gain |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATCH‐N1 | 2Suc, 2Arg | 2Ala | 9 | 8 | 4 | −4 | 56 (48 + 8) | 2.80 |
CATCH‐N2 | 2Suc, 2Arg | 2Asp | 9 | 8 | 4 | −4 | 52 (48 + 4) | 1.60 |
CATCH‐N3 | 2Mal, 2Arg | 2Ala | 9 | 8 | 1 | −3 | 44 (36 + 8) | −0.80 |
CATCH‐N4 | 2Mal, 2Arg | 2Asp | 9 | 8 | 1 | −3 | 40 (36 + 4) | −2.00 |
TCA | 1.6Mal | CO2 | 11 | 8 | 1.6 | −2.8 | 38.8 (33.6 + 5.2) | −2.76 |
TCA | 1.6Suc | CO2 | 11 | 8 | 3.2 | −3.6 | 48.8 (43.6 + 5.2) | 0.12 |
Shown are the numbers of substrate; reaction steps; and the numbers of NADH, QH2, and oxygen molecules required (negative numbers) or generated (positive numbers) during conversion of N2 into two molecules of ammonia. The influx in H+ for each cycle is listed with O2‐dependent proton translocation and O2‐independent proton consumption by enzymatic reactions listed in brackets. An H+/ATP ratio of 3.33 was assumed for estimating the gain in ATP per N2 converted.
Discussion
Here, we report on the CATCH‐N cycle operating on the provision of the two substrates arginine and succinate by the plant as part of a specific metabolic network that drives the process of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in rhizobia. The CATCH‐N cycle shares aspects with the plant mitochondrial arginine degradation pathway (Polacco et al, 2013; Winter et al, 2015) used to liberate ammonium upon germination; however, it delivers up to 25% higher yield in nitrogen in the form of two alanines and three ammonium secreted for each co‐fed arginine and succinate. Thus, from the plant's perspective, the CATCH‐N cycle multiplies the nitrogen releasing capacity of arginine. On the level of bacteroids, the CATCH‐N cycle provides an elegant metabolic solution for maintaining an active respiratory chain under the highly acidic and microoxic conditions present within the lysosomal compartment of the symbiosome, which is in agreement with the symbiosome‐as‐phagolysosome hypothesis stated by Mellor and colleagues (Mellor, 1989).
In this model, nitrogen fixation is essential for the bacteria, which otherwise have no use for the ammonium that the plant finds so valuable (Udvardi & Kahn, 1993). It addresses the question whether bacteria can opt‐out of nitrogen fixation, which might allow cheaters to prosper. If neutralizing acid is what nitrogen fixation does for the bacteria, bacteria that do not fix N2 will be killed as a direct consequence of their lack of cooperation, turning this mutualism into a kind of extortion. If proton consumption is the bacteroid's goal in fixing nitrogen, the plant could control nitrogen fixation by controlling input of carbon through the provision of arginine and dicarboxylate but also through its willingness to accept aspartate or alanine as products from the symbiosome and might control the efficiency of the bacterial neutralization in this way. The existence of different alternatives may be linked to the variation of symbiotic effectiveness.
Thus, the CATCH‐N cycle also functions as an effective mechanism to promote the survival of bacteroids within infected plant cells. Equimolar arginine and succinate serve as substrates, and a molar ratio of nitrogen to the oxygen of 1:4 is required to operate the CATCH‐N cycle. Therefore, nitrogen fixation still depends on oxygen as terminal acceptor, while harnessing elementary nitrogen as the second electron acceptor for reducing equivalents generated by the metabolism. Also, the CATCH‐N cycle requires a constant flux of 8 protons into the symbiosome to maintain the pH balance of the reaction. These protons must be translocated by the action of plant ATPases as part of the symbiosome acidification process. Thus, the operation of the CATCH‐N cycle depends on the presence of an active plant metabolism.
From the nitrogen balance standpoint, a feedback loop exists between the nitrogenase function of bacteroids and the availability of arginine within the host plant. Ammonium released by bacteroids is rapidly incorporated by plant cells into glutamate, glutamine, and aspartate that all serve as precursors for the biosynthesis of ornithine and subsequently for arginine occurring within chloroplasts. The output of the CATCH‐N cycle results in a net gain of assimilated nitrogen that subsequently amplifies the plant's arginine biosynthesis capacity as part of a positive feedback mechanism.
As humanity faces global challenges with population growth and climate change, we need to rethink how tomorrow's agriculture will look like. Thereby, systems‐biology approaches to broaden our understanding of plant–microbe interactions, as well as the design of synthetic nitrogen‐fixing microbes that mimic natural symbiosis with plants, hold significant promise. Our integrated model of the CATCH‐N cycle provides new insights into the principles underlying legume symbiosis and comprises an important stepping stone for the rational biotechnological engineering of artificial nitrogen‐fixing microbes and improved crop plants to ensure food and climate security.
Materials and Methods
Reagents and Tools table
Reagent/Resource | Reference or source | Identifier or catalog number |
---|---|---|
Experimental Models | ||
B. diazoefficiens USDA 110 spc4 | Regensburger and Hennecke (1983) | NA |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::gabT2 | This study | BC3422 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::gabD9 | This study | BC3421 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b:: gabD6 | This study | BC4312 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::odcB | This study | BC4308 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b:: gabD8 | This study | BC4294 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::argI2 | This study | BC3424 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::speB | This study | BC4265 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::speB2 | This study | BC4266 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::argD | This study | BC4270 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::datA | This study | BC4292 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::aspC | This study | BC3417 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::ilvB1 | This study | BC3419 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::gabD7 | This study | BC4296 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::gabD1 | This study | BC3420 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::odcA | This study | BC4269 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::argI1 | This study | BC3423 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::aatB | This study | BC4293 |
E. coli BL21 pET42b::gabT3 | This study | BC4271 |
S. meliloti CL150 (Rm1021 pstC + ecfR1 +) | Schlüter et al (2013) | BC2175 |
S. meliloti CL150 nifD::Tn5‐233 | Lang et al (2018) | CL309 |
S. meliloti CL150 dctAB::aacC1 | This study | BC4081 |
S. meliloti CL150 argI2:: aacC1 | This study | BC3455 |
S. meliloti CL150 satABC::aacC1 | This study | BC3451 |
S. meliloti CL150 ureGFE::aacC1 | This study | BC4083 |
S. meliloti CL150 aspC::aacC1 | This study | BC3457 |
S. meliloti CL150 argI1::aacC1 | This study | BC3453 |
S. meliloti CL150 argI1::smR argI2::aacC1 | This study | BC3766 |
S. meliloti CL150 artABCDE::aacC1 | This study | BC3459 |
S. meliloti CL150 amtB::aacC1 | This study | BC4085 |
M. truncatula Jemalong wt | Pecrix et al (2018) | NA |
M. truncatula Jemalong lss | Schnabel et al (2010) | NA |
G. max cultivar Williams | NA | |
Oligonucleotides and sequence‐based reagents | ||
PCR primers | This study | Dataset EV5 |
Chemicals, enzymes and other reagents | ||
4‐Aminobutanoic acid | Sigma‐Aldrich | A2129‐10G |
4‐Guanidinobutyric acid | Sigma‐Aldrich | G6503‐1G |
Agmatine | Sigma‐Aldrich | 101443‐1G |
Aminobutanal | This work | NA |
Guanidinobutanal | This work | NA |
L‐Arginine | Fluka | 11010 |
L‐Arginine (13C) | Sigma‐Aldrich | 643440‐100MG |
L‐Arginine (15N) | Sigma‐Aldrich | 643440‐100MG |
L‐Citrulline | Sigma‐Aldrich | C7629‐1G |
L‐Ornithine | Sigma‐Aldrich | O8305‐25G |
NAD+ | Sigma‐Aldrich | N1636 |
Putrescine | Sigma‐Aldrich | P5780 |
Pyruvate | Sigma‐Aldrich | P2256‐100G |
Succinate | Sigma‐Aldrich | 150‐90‐3 |
Succinic semialdehyde | This work | NA |
Sulfuric acid | Sigma‐Aldrich | 258105 |
Sodium hypochlorite solution | VWR | BDH7038 |
Restriction enzyme SpeI | New England Biolabs | R0133 |
Restriction enzyme MfeI | New England Biolabs | R0589 |
Other | ||
GC6850 gas chromatograph instrument | Agilent Technologies | |
6550 accurate‐mass quadrupole time‐of‐flight | Agilent Technologies | |
Agilent HILIC Plus RRHD column | Agilent Technologies | |
5500 QTRAP triple‐quadrupole mass spectrometer | AB Sciex | |
HisTrap FF crude column | GE Healthcare | GE11‐0004‐58 |
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strains, cultivation, and growth conditions
Sinorhizobium meliloti strain CL150 (Rm1021, pstC + ecfR1 +) (Schlüter et al, 2013) was grown at 30°C in LB broth medium with 5 g NaCl per liter. Escherichia coli was grown in LB broth at 37°C. Where necessary, growth media were supplemented with antibiotics at the following concentrations: gentamicin, 10 μg/ml for E. coli and 30 μg/ml for S. meliloti when cultured in LB; streptomycin, 200 μg/ml; and ampicillin, 50 μg/ml.
Plant cultivation and inoculation assays
Medicago truncatula WT Jemalong seeds were surface‐sterilized with 70% ethanol for five minutes and thoroughly rinsed with water. Seeds were imbibed with gentle agitation for at least four hours with two water changes and further imbibed overnight at room temperature without light. After imbibition, seeds were washed with water and germinated at 30°C for 24 h. Seedlings were planted into a sterile perlite substrate (Isoself, Knauf) within 300 cm3 black plastic pots (Greenhouse, Elho). Plants were grown in plant growth shelves at room temperature with a controlled 16‐h day and 8‐h night cycle. During the light cycle, every pot received 2500 lumens using 36 W Fluora 77 OSRAM light bulbs. Plants were automatically watered with a droplet watering system (Micro‐drip‐system, Gardena Art. 8311‐20 Art. 1407‐20) at 3‐day intervals with 80 ml of 10% BNM solution (Ehrhardt et al, 1992). Pots were covered with a transparent PET cylinder during growth. Three days after germination, plants were inoculated with 20 ml of a S. meliloti cell culture with a cell density of an OD600nm of 0.05 resuspended in 1 mM MgSO4. The inoculation time point was considered as day zero post‐inoculation (dpi).
Glycine max cultivar Williams seeds were surface‐sterilized with a wash in 100% ethanol for 5 min followed by a wash in 35% H2O2 for 15 min. Afterward, seeds were thoroughly rinsed with water. Seeds were germinated in 0.8% agar plates for 24–48 h at 25°C in the dark. Seedlings were planted on 200 cm3 brown glass jars filled with autoclaved vermiculite (Vermisol) and 100 ml of Jensen media (Vincent, 1970). After transplantation, plants were inoculated with B. diazoefficiens (1 ml OD600 nm of 0.01). The inoculation time point was considered as day zero post‐inoculation (dpi). Plants were grown in plant growth chambers at 28°C with a controlled 16‐h day and 8‐h night cycle as previously described (Göttfert et al, 1990). After 5 dpi, plants were watered every 3 days with sterile water.
Phenotypic characterization of plants to assess symbiotic nitrogen fixation
Symbiosis phenotypes such as nodulation frequency, plant dry weight, and nitrogenase activity were determined in M. truncatula WT plants 8 weeks post‐inoculation with S. meliloti gene deletion mutants and wild‐type control strains. Nitrogenase activity of M. truncatula was determined by measuring acetylene reduction to ethylene as previously reported. Plants were placed into 50 cm3 sealed vials to which acetylene was injected to a final concentration of 2%. Ethylene production was measured after 3 h and 5 h of incubation on an analytic gas chromatograph instrument (GC6850, Agilent Technologies). The ethylene background was monitored and systematically removed from every measurement. To determine the average ethylene production per nodule, ethylene production was normalized by nodule number and duration of acetylene incubation. Nodulation frequency was determined by manually counting all the visible nodules per plant. For dry weight determination, plant shoots were dried at 85°C for at least 20 h prior individual plant weight measurement (ABS 80‐40 N, KERN). Measurements from replicas were averaged and normalized to the S. meliloti CL150 WT reference strain. Nitrogenase activity, plant dry weight, and nodulation frequency were determined for at least 22 independent plants for each assayed S. meliloti strain.
Sinorhizobium meliloti bacteroid ultrastructure determination through scanning electron microscopy
Medicago truncatula nodules were harvested 10 weeks post‐inoculation (wpi), cut open longitudinally, and collected in a vessel with fixative buffer (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 2% formaldehyde in 0.15 M Na‐cacodylate with 2 mM CaCl2). The nodule containing vessel was subjected to vacuum for at least 30 min to allow the nodules to sink followed by microwave fixation in fresh fixative (PELCO BioWave Pro+) and washed with fixative buffer. Nodules were stained through sequential incubation with (i) 2% OsO4, 1.5% K4Fe(CN)6 in 0.15 M Na‐Cacodylate with 2 mM CaCl2; (ii) 1% thiocarbohydrazide; (iii) 2% OsO4; (iv) 1% uranylacetate; and (v) Waltons lead aspartate; samples were washed with fixative buffer between every step. Samples were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, dry ethanol) and washed with dry acetone. Samples were placed in a graded series of Epon/Araldite in dry acetone (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 100%) and allowed to polymerize at 60°C for 3 days. Ultrathin sections (100 nm) were transferred to Si‐wafer‐chips and imaged on a FE‐SEM FEI Magellan 400i operating at 1.8 kV and 0.8 nA with a 20 nm pixel size by backscatter electron detection.
Substrate specific stimulation of nitrogenase activity in isolated bacteroids
Sinorhizobium meliloti and B. diazoefficiens bacteroids were isolated from M. truncatula and G. max root nodules, respectively, according to following procedure. Plant roots were harvested 3 weeks (G. max) or 10 weeks (M. truncatula) post‐inoculation with wild‐type B. diazoefficiens 110spc4 strain (Regensburger & Hennecke, 1983) and S. meliloti CL150 strain, respectively, and rinsed thoroughly with water. Under anaerobic conditions (92% N2, 8% H2), nodules (250 mg to 1 g wet weight) were crushed in PBS (10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4) and filtered through three layers of gauze to remove debris. Bacteroid suspensions (2 ml corresponding to 4 × 106 bacteroid cells) were added to 15‐ml sealed flasks to obtain reference measurements of nitrogenase activity in isolated bacteroids in the presence of plant crude extract. To assay stimulation of nitrogenase activities upon addition of substrates, bacteroid suspensions were washed two times with PBS under anerobic conditions and pelleted by centrifugation at 1,000 g. Recovered bacteroids (4 × 106 cells) were resuspended in 2 ml of induction media (2 μM biotin, 1 mM MgSO4, 42.2 mM Na2HPO4}, 22 mM KH2PO4, 8.5 mM NaCl, 21 nM CoCl2, 1 μM NaMoO4 pH 7.0) and added to 15‐ml sealed flasks. Induction media were supplemented with either 7.4 mM succinate or 5 mM arginine or both substrates. Acetylene and oxygen were added to a final concentration of 5% and 0.01%, respectively, in the head space of each flask. Nitrogenase activity was determined for each sample through measuring the reduction of acetylene into ethylene after 1 and 3 h time points. Ethylene production was detected with gas chromatograph (GC6850, Agilent Technologies). Activities were normalized by nodule wet weight. Furthermore, relative activities were calculated by subtracting the baseline activity of washed bacteroid samples without substrate supplementation. Reported B. diazoefficiens and S. meliloti activity is the result of 17 and 4 independent preparations, respectively.
Substrate specific stimulation of ATP production in isolated bacteroids
Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens bacteroids were isolated from 3 weeks post‐inoculated G. max root nodules. Nodules (1 g wet weight) were crushed in PBS (10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4) and filtered through three layers of gauze to remove debris. Bacteroid suspension was pelleted by centrifugation at 2,500 g, and the supernatant (nodule extract) was saved for later usage. Bacteroid suspension (5 × 108} cells) was washed twice with PBS and resuspended in 1 ml of induction media (2 μM biotin, 1 mM MgSO4, 42.2 mM Na2HPO4, 22 mM KH2PO4, 8.5 mM NaCl, 21 nM CoCl2, 1 μM NaMoO4 pH 7.0). To avoid ATP generation from aerobic respiration, the bacteroid suspension was placed under anaerobic conditions (92% N2, 8% H2) to perform the rest of the procedure. Bacteroids (200 μL) were incubated in 2 mL of nodule extract (obtained at the beginning of the protocol) or induction media without supplements or supplemented with either 7.4 mM succinate or 5 mM arginine or both substrates. ATP content was determined for each sample (using a 1:10 dilution) through ATP‐dependent luciferase reaction (BacTiter‐Glo Microbial Cell Viability Assay, Promega). Luminescence from luciferase activity was quantified with Victor3 multilabel plate counter (PerkinElmer).
Transposon mutagenesis
To generate hyper‐saturated transposon mutant libraries in S. meliloti, a previously described Tn5 mutagenesis procedure for Caulobacter crescentus was adapted (Christen et al, 2011). In brief, the Tn5 delivery ColE1 plasmid pTn5_gent_14N (Christen et al, 2016) was conjugated from an E. coli SM10 donor strain into a S. meliloti CL150 recipient strain. Separate transposon mutant libraries were generated and growth selected on rich medium (LB). For each condition, a total of sixteen independent conjugations were performed and replicate libraries were tagged using eight barcoded Tn5 derivatives. Transposon insertion mutants were selected on LB supplemented with gentamicin and streptomycin. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 2 days, and transposon mutant libraries from each plate were separately pooled, supplemented with 10% v/v DMSO (Sigma‐Aldrich), and stored in 96‐well deep‐well plates at −80°C for further processing.
In planta selection of transposon mutant libraries
Transposon mutant pools were selected for infection and nodule formation in legume plants. For nodulation experiments, a Medicago truncatula lss super‐nodulator mutant was used (Schnabel et al, 2010). Seeds were treated with concentrated H2SO4 (Sigma‐Aldrich) for 5 min, thoroughly rinsed with sterile water, then sterilized with 7% NaClO (VWR chemicals) for 3 min, and again rinsed with sterile water. The seeds were then imbibed with gentle agitation for four hours with regular water changes and then incubated overnight in the dark at room temperature. After imbibition, seeds were rinsed with sterile water, placed in deep petri plates, and inverted for 24 h at 30°C to allow for the downward growth of the seedling roots. After removing seed coats, groups of 25 seedlings were planted on large square plates (Genetix) containing 1.2% buffered nodulation medium (Ehrhardt et al, 1992) supplemented with 0.1 nM aminoethoxy vinyl glycine. Altogether, 4,500 M. truncatula lss plant seedlings were grown at 22°C with a controlled 16‐h day and 8‐h night cycle (2500 Lumens using Osram Fluora L36 W/77 bulbs). Five days post‐germination, M. truncatula lss seedlings were flood‐inoculated with S. meliloti Tn5 mutant reference libraries initially selected on rich media conditions (LB). During inoculation experiments, input libraries were kept independent from each other. S. meliloti transposon input mutant pools were inoculated from 96‐well storage plates, grown overnight, washed, and resuspended to an OD600 nm = 0.05 in 10 mM MgSO4. Plant roots were then aseptically inoculated with 5 ml of a dilute bacterial suspension, followed by removal of the excess bacterial suspension.
Recovery of transposon mutant libraries from nodules
After 6 weeks post‐inoculation, nodules were harvested. To recover transposon mutants capable of infecting root nodules, a two‐step surface sterilization protocol was employed. Nodule material was washed with 1% SDS and then treated with 70% ethanol for 5 min, followed by rinsing with sterile water. Next, nodules were treated for 3 min with 0.2% NaClO (VWR chemicals) followed by three rinses with sterile water. The surface‐sterilized nodules were crushed in cold PBS (10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4) and filtered through three layers of gauze to remove debris. The filtered suspension containing bacteroids was plated on LB supplemented with gentamicin and streptomycin and grown for 2 days at 30°C. The recovered S. meliloti colonies were pooled and arrayed in 96‐well plates and stored at −80°C for subsequent use.
Data analysis and mapping of transposon insertion sites
Raw sequencing data processing and read alignment were performed using a custom sequence analysis pipeline based on Python, Biopython (Cock et al, 2009), bwa (Li & Durbin, 2010), and MATLAB routines as previously described (Christen et al, 2016). Adapter sequences were detected using Python string comparison with a 15 bp search window. Demultiplexing into the different TnSeq selection experiments was performed according to a defined barcode sequence tag internal to the arbitrary primer sequence. Reads were aligned onto the S. meliloti 1021 NCBI reference genome (NC_003047, NC_003037, NC_003078; Barnett et al, 2001; Finan et al, 2001; Galibert et al, 2001) using bwa‐07.12 (Li & Durbin, 2010). Insertion datasets were correlated with the genome annotation to analyze global insertion statistics and calculate transposon insertion occurrence and distributions within each annotated GenBank feature of the S. meliloti 1,021 genome (Galibert et al, 2001)} as previously described (Christen et al, 2016).
Gene essentiality analysis across selection conditions
The metrics and statistical analysis for classification of protein‐coding sequences (CDS) into essential, promoting fitness, and non‐essential categories have been previously described (Christen et al, 2011). CDS are classified as “essential” or “fitness” genes according to the following criteria. CDS are classified as essential if the transposon insertion density is < 6 times the average insertion density measured across the genome and has either a single transposon insertion gap covering more than 60% of the CDS or has two internal transposon gaps covering more than 80% of the CDS. If the average transposon density is less than four times the average insertion density across the genome but no essentiality criterion was satisfied, CDS were classified as fitness genes. For the nodule selected TnSeq dataset, a symbiosis impairment score (P‐values) was calculated for each gene based on the number and distribution of transposon insertions recovered from the in planta selection experiments. The symbiosis impairment score was calculated for each gene as the product of the probability p1, to recover i transposon insertions when λ insertions are expected according to a Poisson distribution, and the probability p2, to observe a consecutive loss in transposon insertions equals or exceeding k insertions as compared to the input mutant pool. The expected number of recovered insertions was estimated based on the observed loss rate of neutral insertions (l = 6.840) due to sampling. The probability p1 was calculated according to the following formula:
The probability p2 was calculated for each gene based on the total number of insertions (n) present in the input mutant pool, the number of recovered insertions from the output mutant pool (i), and the maximal number of consecutive insertions that where lost upon in planta selection (k) by calculating the number (h) of compositions of length i + 1 for n where each part does not exceed k, divided by the total number of compositions (htot) for n. The probability p2 was calculated according to the following formula:
For k smaller than (n−i)/2 and n not to exceed 100, p2 was numerically calculated by calculating the number (h) of compositions of length i + 1} for n where each part does not exceed k by brute force. For k smaller than (n−i)/2 and n equals or exceeding 100, we approximated p2 by sampling the composition space by random simulation and counting the occurrences of compositions of length i + 1 for n where each part does not exceed k.
Construction of targeted gene deletions in Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti deletion mutants were generated by replacing the native gene with the aacC1 gene conferring gentamycin resistance using a one‐step double homologous recombination procedure as detailed in Ledermann et al (2016). Flanking DNA regions covering 750 bp upstream and downstream of a target gene were PCR amplified (Dataset EV5) and subsequently fused to a central gentamicin resistance gene using splicing by overlapping extension PCR or Gibson assembly (Gibson et al, 2009) to produce gene replacement cassettes. The gene replacement cassettes were cloned via SpeI and MfeI into the pNPTS138 plasmid, which is non‐replicative in S. meliloti and confers kanamycin resistance. Cloned plasmids were sequence confirmed and conjugated into S. meliloti strain CL150. Recombinants were selected on LB media supplemented with gentamicin and subsequently screened for kanamycin sensitivity. Single gene deletion strains were confirmed by PCR and sequencing. A similar deletion strategy was employed for construction of the double arginase mutant (∆argI1 ∆argI2) with a gene replacement cassette for argI1 carrying a spectinomycin marker gene. The resulting plasmid was conjugated into S. meliloti CL150 ∆argI2, and the double arginase double mutant strain was screened for kanamycin sensitivity before verification of constructed deletion by PCR and sequencing.
13C arginine isotope tracing in Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens bacteroids
Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens bacteroids were isolated under anaerobic conditions from three weeks post‐inoculated G. max root nodules according to Sarma and Emerich (2005) and Delmotte et al (2010). Nodules (10 g wet weight) were crushed in PBS (10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4). The homogenate was passed through four layers of cheesecloth (pre‐moistened with PBS) into a sterile centrifuge tube, re‐extracted several times with buffer, and centrifuged at 400 g for 10 min. The resulting pellet was resuspended twice in PBS and centrifuged at 8,000 g for 20 min. The pellet was dispersed into the extraction buffer (2 ml/g original weight of the nodule) and was layered onto a pre‐equilibrated Ludox gradient consisting of 25% (10 ml) Ludox and 75% PBS (30 ml). The gradient tubes were centrifuged in an SW‐28 rotor at 10,000 g for 35 min at 4°C in a Beckman L8–55 ultracentrifuge. The bacteroid layer with a density of 1.09 g/ml was collected. The bacteroid pellet was suspended in distilled water and collected by centrifugation at 10,000 g. For labeling assays, bacteroids were resuspended in 10 ml volume in PBS to a final OD of 4.0. After the addition of succinate (5 mM) and 13C arginine (5 mM), bacteroids were incubated at RT under microaerobic condition (0.1% v/v) and samples of 250 μl were taken at regular time intervals, filtered on a PVDF 0.45 μl membrane and immediately washed with 1.0 ml H2O Chromasolv. The filter with the cell pellet was extracted in 3 ml (40% MeOH, 40% acetonitrile and 20% H2O) at −20°C for 1 h, stored at −80°C, and finally dried in a SpeedVac. The metabolite extracts were resuspended in 100 μl MilliQ water, and metabolites were analyzed using a HILIC method. 5 μl of metabolite extract was injected on an Agilent HILIC Plus RRHD column (100 mm × 2.1 mm × 1.8 μm; Agilent). The gradient of mobile phase A (10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid) and mobile phase B (acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid) was as follows: 0 min, 90% B; 2 min, 40% B; 3 min, 40% B; 5 min, 90% B; and 6 min, 90% B. The flow rate was held constant at 400 μl min−1. Metabolites were detected on a 5500 QTRAP triple‐quadrupole mass spectrometer in positive mode with MRM scan type (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA). The raw data were processed and analyzed by custom software using MATLAB (MathWorks).
15N arginine isotope tracing in Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens bacteroids
Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens bacteroids were isolated from 3 weeks post‐inoculated G. max root nodules under anaerobic conditions as described above. Bacteroids were resuspended (1 ml/g nodule wet weight) in 2 ml of tracing media (2 μM biotin, 1 mM MgSO4, 42.2 mM Na2HPO4, 22 mM KH2PO4, 8.5 mM NaCl, 21 nM CoCl2, 1 μM NaMoO4 pH 7.0, 10 mM NH4Cl, 7.4 mM succinate, and 5 mM 15N arginine). Bacteroid suspensions were incubated at room temperature under microaerobic conditions (0.1% v/v). Aliquots (20 μl) of the enzymatic reaction were sampled over the time series, and reaction was blocked by adding 180 μl of ice‐cold methanol. Relative metabolite abundances were determined by non‐targeted flow injection analysis as described previously (Fuhrer et al, 2011). Mass spectra were recorded in negative‐ionization profile mode from m/z 50 to m/z 1,000 on an Agilent 6550 accurate‐mass quadrupole time‐of‐flight instrument with a frequency of 1.4 spectra/s using the highest resolving power (4 GHz HiRes). The source gas temperature was set to 225°C, with 11 l min−1 drying gas and a nebulizer pressure of 20 psig. The sheath gas temperature was set to 350°C, and the flow rate was 10 l min−1. Electrospray nozzle and capillary voltages were set at 2,000 and 3,500 V, respectively.
Purification of recombinant proteins
Coding sequences of interest were amplified by PCR (Dataset EV5) and cloned into pET42 expression plasmids inframe to a C‐terminal (His)6‐tag (6xHis). The resulting vectors were sequence‐verified and electroporated into BL21 rosetta pLys strains. E. coli BL21 harboring the expression vectors were grown at 30°C in LB medium containing chloramphenicol (20 mg/l) and kanamycin (30 mg/l). When the cultures reached an OD600nm of 0.4, isopropyl‐β‐D‐thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 M. After the addition of IPTG, the culture was grown for 2–4 h more at 30°C to induce the expression of the recombinant proteins. Grown cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,095 g for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting pellet was either shock frozen with liquid N2 and stored at −80°C or immediately used for protein extraction and purification. To purify the recombinant proteins, cells were resuspended in NPI‐buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM NaCl, pH7.4) supplemented with 10 mM imidazole and disrupted using a French press (SLM Instruments Inc.). Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 17,000 g for 15 min at 4°C to remove cell debris. The supernatant was loaded on HisTrap FF crude column (GE Healthcare) previously equilibrated with NPI‐buffer supplemented with 10 mM imidazole. The column was washed twice with NPI‐buffer supplemented with 10 mM and 20 mM imidazole, respectively. The purified enzymes were eluted with NPI‐buffer supplemented with 250 mM imidazole, concentrated by ultrafiltration with Amicon Ultra‐4 centrifugal filters (Merck Millipore), and dialyzed against NPI‐buffer containing 10% (v/v) glycerol. Protein concentration was determined using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Scientific). Protein samples were shocked frozen with liquid N2 and stored at −80°C until use.
Chemical synthesis of succinate semialdehyde, 4‐aminobutanal, and 4‐guanidinobutanal
The arginine transamination metabolic network contains a set of 13 intermediates. Thereof, three intermediates succinate semialdehyde, 4‐aminobutanal, and 4‐guanidinobutanal are not commercially available and were chemically synthesized for use in subsequent enzyme characterization studies as aldehyde dehydrogenase substrates.
Succinate semialdehyde was synthesized according to the procedure as previously described (Bruce et al, 1971). In a 15 ml Falcon tube, a solution of monosodium glutamate (169 mg, 1 mmol) in 5.0 ml distilled water was exposed to a gentle flow of N2 for 5 min. An equimolar amount of chloramine T (227 mg, 1 mmol) was added to the solution and dissolved by heating the solution to 60°C. After further incubation at 60°C for an additional 15 min, the mixture was cooled to 25°C and adjusted to pH 2.0 with concentrated HCl and degassed. Reaction by‐products were crystallized by placing the mixture on ice and removed by filtration. The aqueous phase was extracted with diethyl ether 3 times, organic phases were combined, and the water fraction was discarded. Diethyl ether was evaporated yielding an aqueous solution of 1% of the starting material and a concentration of approximately 2 M succinic semialdehyde.
4‐guanidinobutyraldehyde was prepared from L‐arginine according to Tanaka et al (2001). The procedure follows a similar reaction scheme as detailed for the synthesis of succinic semialdehyde with the following modifications. As starting material, arginine hydrochloride (210 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved. Upon addition of chloramine T (227 mg, 1 mmol), the mixture was adjusted to a pH 6.5 with 1 N HCl (50 μl) and heated to 60°C. Prior extraction with diethyl ether, the solution was adjusted to pH 13.5 with 10 N NaOH.
4‐aminobutyraldehyde was prepared by the hydrolysis of 1.0 ml of 0.5 M 4‐aminobutyraldehyde diethyl acetal (Sigma‐Aldrich). 172 μl 4‐aminobutyraldehyde diethyl acetal was dissolved in 2 ml H2O, and 1 N HCl was added to acidify to pH 3.0. After incubation for 30 min at 30°C, the reaction mixture was titrated to pH 10.0 with 1 N NaOH. The crude reaction product 4‐aminobutanal was extracted from the water phase with five consecutive extraction steps using 1 ml diethyl ether. Ether fractions were combined, and the solvent was removed by evaporation. The reaction product 4‐aminobutyraldehyde was obtained as a colorless liquid of 40.0 mg mass.
Enzyme characterization and activity assays
Transaminases were assayed for enzymatic activity according to the following procedure. A total of 30 μg purified enzyme were added to 200 μl reaction mixture containing 1 mM arginine, 1 mM ornithine, 1 mM citrulline, 1 mM agmatine, 1 mM putrescine, 1 mM 4‐guanidinobutanoate, 1 mM 4‐aminobutanoate, 10 mM of pyruvate, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, and 100 μM pyridoxal phosphate in 50 mM PBS pH 7.4 followed by incubation at 25°C. Aliquots (20 μl) of the enzymatic reaction were sampled over the time series, and reactions were blocked by adding 180 μl of ice‐cold methanol. Ureohydrolases were assayed for enzymatic activity according to the following procedure. A total of 30 μg purified enzyme were added to 200 μl reaction mixture containing 1 mM arginine, 1 mM agmatine, 1 mM 4‐guanidinobutanoate, 10 mM of pyruvate, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, and 100 μM pyridoxal phosphate in 50 mM PBS pH 8.0, previously incubated at 25°C for 30 min with 0.15 ng/μl purified AspC followed by heat inactivation at 65°C for 5 min to generate 5‐guanidino‐2‐oxopentanoate (GOP) and guanidinobutanal, from arginine and agmatine transamination, respectively. Ureohydrolase reactions were done at 25°C. Aliquots (20 μl) of the enzymatic reaction were sampled over the time series, and reaction was blocked by adding 180 μl of ice‐cold methanol. Decarboxylases were assayed for enzymatic activity according to the following procedure. A total of 30 μg purified enzyme were added to 200 μl reaction mixture containing 1 mM arginine, 1 mM ornithine, 1 mM citrulline, 10 mM of pyruvate, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, 100 μM pyridoxal phosphate, and 500 μM thiamine pyrophosphate in 50 mM PBS pH 8.0, previously incubated at 25°C for 30 min with 0.15 ng/μl purified AspC followed by heat inactivation at 65°C for 5 min to generate 5‐guanidino‐2‐oxopentanoate (GOP) from arginine transamination. Decarboxylase reactions were done at 25°C. Aliquots (20 μl) of the enzymatic reaction were sampled over the time series, and reactions were blocked by adding 180 μl of ice‐cold methanol. Substrate consumption and product formation of transaminases, ureohydrolases, and decarboxylases reactions were determined by non‐targeted flow injection MS analysis as described previously (Fuhrer et al, 2011). Dehydrogenase activities were assayed from cell lysates of BL21 rosetta pLys strain expressing S. meliloti dehydrogenases according to the following procedure. Cell lysates, corresponding to 20 μg of dehydrogenase enzymes, were added to a substrate mixture containing 1 mM succinate semialdehyde or 1 mM 4‐guanidinobutanal or 1 mM 4‐aminobutanal in 10 mM PBS pH 10.0 supplemented with 1 mM NAD+. Dehydrogenase reaction was determined by the conversion of NAD+ into NADH + H+, which was measured by the increase in absorbance at 340 nm.
Biochemical reconstitution of the catabolic arginine transamination network
To reconstruct a functional catabolic arginine transamination network in vitro, a multienzyme assay comprising 14 purified enzymes was established. A reaction buffer containing of 500 μM thiamine pyrophosphate, 100 μM pyridoxal phosphate, 2 mM NAD, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM MnCl2 in 50 mM PBS pH 8.0 was prepared. Purified enzymes (25 μg each) from the catabolic arginine transamination network (AspC, AatB, ArgD, GabT2, DatA, ArgI1, SpeB, SpeB2, IlvB1, OdcA, OdcB, GabD1, GabD6, and GabD7) were added one by one and gently mixed into the reaction mixture. After the addition of all enzymes, 20 mM pyruvate and 2 mM arginine were added and gently mixed. As a control, the enzyme mix was incubated in a reaction buffer lacking arginine and pyruvate. Aliquots (15 μl) of the enzymatic reaction were sampled over the time series, and reaction was blocked by adding 135 μl of ice‐cold methanol. Substrate consumption and product formation of enzymatic reactions were determined by non‐targeted flow injection MS analysis as described previously (Fuhrer et al, 2011).
Author contributions
CEF‐T, FT, MC, and BC performed transposon mutagenesis experiments; CEF‐T, FT, CM, MC, and BC performed research; TF performed MS measurement; BC, MC, and CEF‐T performed data analysis; US and TF provided comments on the manuscript; MC and BC conceived the theoretical concept of the CATCH‐N cycle; and CEF‐T, MC, and BC wrote the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare the following competing interests: B.C. and M.C. hold shares in Gigabases Switzerland AG, which develops microbes with improved nitrogen fixation to enhance the sustainability of agriculture.
Supporting information
Appendix
Expanded View Figures PDF
Dataset EV1
Dataset EV2
Dataset EV3
Dataset EV4
Dataset EV5
Source Data for Appendix
Review Process File
Source Data for Figure 1
Source Data for Figure 2
Source Data for Figure 3
Source Data for Figure 4
Source Data for Table 1
Acknowledgments
We thank R. Schlapbach and L. Poveda from ZFGC and Christa Pennacchio from the Joint Genome Institute for sequencing support, Anne Greet Bittermann and members from ScopeM, ETH Zürich for electron microscopy support, and H. Christen for the conception of computational algorithms, mathematical conception, and the statistical framework for TnSeq data analysis. We thank H‐M. Fischer and R. Ledermann for help with plant phenotypic analyses and nitrogenase assays and H. Hennecke for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work received institutional support from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, ETH research grant (ETH‐08 16‐1) to B.C, the Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_166476, 310030_184664 and CRSII5_177164) to B.C, and a Community Science Program (CSP) DNA sequencing award (CSP‐1107) from the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute in Walnut Creek. CA, USA. The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE‐AC02‐05CH11231.
Mol Syst Biol. (2020) 16: e9419
Contributor Information
Matthias Christen, Email: matthias.christen@imsb.biol.ethz.ch.
Beat Christen, Email: beat.christen@imsb.biol.ethz.ch.
Data availability
The datasets produced and presented in this study are available as [Link], [Link], [Link], [Link], [Link].
References
- Allaway D, Lodwig EM, Crompton LA, Wood M, Parsons R, Wheeler TR, Poole PS (2000) Identification of alanine dehydrogenase and its role in mixed secretion of ammonium and alanine by pea bacteroids. Mol Microbiol 36: 508–515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett MJ, Fisher RF, Jones T, Komp C, Abola AP, Barloy‐Hubler F, Bowser L, Capela D, Galibert F, Gouzy J et al (2001) Nucleotide sequence and predicted functions of the entire Sinorhizobium meliloti pSymA megaplasmid. PNAS 98: 9883–9888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beatty PH, Good AG (2011) Plant science. Future prospects for cereals that fix nitrogen. Science 333: 416–417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergersen FJ, Turner GL (1967) Nitrogen fixation by the bacteroid fraction of breis of soybean root nodules. Biochim Biophys Acta 141: 507–515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N (2014) Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb Cell Fact 13: 66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown CM, Dilworth MJ (1975) Ammonia assimilation by rhizobium cultures and bacteroids. J Gen Microbiol 86: 39–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruce P, Sims K, Pitts FN (1971) Synthesis and purification of succinic semialdehyde. Anal Biochem 41: 271–273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buckel W, Thauer RK (2018) Flavin‐based electron bifurcation, ferredoxin, flavodoxin, and anaerobic respiration with protons (Ech) or NAD+ (Rnf) as electron acceptors: a historical review. Front Microbiol 9: 401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burén S, López‐Torrejón G, Rubio LM (2018) Extreme bioengineering to meet the nitrogen challenge. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115: 8849–8851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buschmann S, Warkentin E, Xie H, Langer JD, Ermler U, Michel H (2010) The structure of cbb3 cytochrome oxidase provides insights into proton pumping. Science 329: 327–330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christen B, Abeliuk E, Collier JM, Kalogeraki VS, Passarelli B, Coller JA, Fero MJ, McAdams HH, Shapiro L (2011) The essential genome of a bacterium. Mol Syst Biol 7: 528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christen M, Beusch C, Bösch Y, Cerletti D, Flores‐Tinoco CE, Del Medico L, Tschan F, Christen B (2016) Quantitative selection analysis of bacteriophage φCbK Susceptibility in Caulobacter crescentus . J Mol Biol 428: 419–430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clarke VC, Loughlin PC, Day DA, Smith PMC (2014) Transport processes of the legume symbiosome membrane. Front Plant Sci 5: 699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cock PJA, Antao T, Chang JT, Chapman BA, Cox CJ, Dalke A, Friedberg I, Hamelryck T, Kauff F, Wilczynski B et al (2009) Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25: 1422–1423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cunin R, Glansdorff N, Piérard A, Stalon V (1986) Biosynthesis and metabolism of arginine in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 50: 314–352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day DA, Poole PS, Tyerman SD, Rosendahl L (2001) Ammonia and amino acid transport across symbiotic membranes in nitrogen‐fixing legume nodules. Cell Mol Life Sci 58: 61–71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delmotte N, Ahrens CH, Knief C, Qeli E, Koch M, Fischer H‐M, Vorholt JA, Hennecke H, Pessi G (2010) An integrated proteomics and transcriptomics reference data set provides new insights into the Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroid metabolism in soybean root nodules. Proteomics 10: 1391–1400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon RA, Postgate JR (1972) Genetic transfer of nitrogen fixation from Klebsiella pneumoniae to Escherichia coli . Nature 237: 102–103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunn MF (1998) Tricarboxylic acid cycle and anaplerotic enzymes in rhizobia. J Exp Bot 22: 105–123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunn MF (2015) Key roles of microsymbiont amino acid metabolism in rhizobia‐legume interactions. Crit Rev Microbiol 41: 411–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ehrhardt DW, Atkinson EM, Long SR (1992) Depolarization of alfalfa root hair membrane potential by Rhizobium meliloti Nod factors. Science 256: 998–1000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finan TM, Weidner S, Wong K, Buhrmester J, Chain P, Vorholter FJ, Hernandez‐Lucas I, Becker A, Cowie A, Gouzy J et al (2001) The complete sequence of the 1,683‐kb pSymB megaplasmid from the N2‐fixing endosymbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti . PNAS 98: 9889–9894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuhrer T, Heer D, Begemann B, Zamboni N (2011) High‐throughput, accurate mass metabolome profiling of cellular extracts by flow injection‐time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 83: 7074–7080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galibert F, Finan TM, Long SR, Puhler A, Abola P, Ampe F, Barloy‐Hubler F, Barnett MJ, Becker A, Boistard P et al (2001) The composite genome of the legume symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti . Science 293: 668–672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang R‐Y, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, Smith HO (2009) Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6: 343–345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Good A (2018) Toward nitrogen‐fixing plants. Science 359: 869–870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Göttfert M, Hitz S, Hennecke H (1990) Identification of nodS and nodU, two inducible genes inserted between the Bradyrhizobium japonicum nodYABC and nodIJ genes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 3: 308–316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graham PH, Vance CP (2000) Nitrogen fixation in perspective: an overview of research and extension needs. Field Crop Res 65: 93–106 [Google Scholar]
- Gruber N, Galloway JN (2008) An Earth‐system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature 451: 293–296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta G, Parihar SS, Ahirwar NK, Snehi SK, Singh V (2015) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (pgpr): current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J Microb Biochem Technol 7: 96–102 [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman BM, Dean DR, Seefeldt LC (2009) Climbing nitrogenase: toward a mechanism of enzymatic nitrogen fixation. Acc Chem Res 42: 609–619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman BM, Lukoyanov D, Yang Z‐Y, Dean DR, Seefeldt LC (2014) Mechanism of nitrogen fixation by nitrogenase: the next stage. Chem Rev 114: 4041–4062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kahn ML, Kraus J, Somerville JE (1985) A model of nutrient exchange in the (Brady)‐rhizobium‐legume symbiosis Dordrecht. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; [Google Scholar]
- Kretovich VL, Karyakina TI, Sidel ‘Nikova LI, Shaposhnikov GL, Kaloshina GS (1986) Nitrogen fixation and biosynthesis of aspartic acid and alanine by bacteroids of Rhizobium lupini on various carbon sources. Dokl Biochem 291: 380–383 [Google Scholar]
- Lang C, Barnett MJ, Fisher RF, Smith LS, Diodati ME, Long SR (2018) Most Sinorhizobium meliloti extracytplasmic function sigma factors control accessory functions. MSphere 3: e00454‐18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledbetter RN, Costas AMG, Lubner CE, Mulder DW, Tokmina‐Lukaszewska M, Artz JH, Patterson A, Magnuson TS, Jay ZJ, Duan HD et al (2017) The electron bifurcating FixABCX protein complex from Azotobacter vinelandii: generation of low‐potential reducing equivalents for nitrogenase catalysis. Biochemistry 56: 4177–4190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledermann R, Strebel S, Kampik C, Fischer H‐M, Spormann AM (2016) Versatile vectors for efficient mutagenesis of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens and other Alphaproteobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 82: 2791–2799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H, Durbin R (2010) Fast and accurate long‐read alignment with Burrows‐Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26: 589–595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li X‐X, Liu Q, Liu X‐M, Shi H‐W, Chen S‐F (2016) Using synthetic biology to increase nitrogenase activity. Microb Cell Fact 15: 1–11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marquis RE, Bender GR, Murray DR, Wong A (1987) Arginine deiminase system and bacterial adaptation to acid environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 53: 198–200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mellor RB (1989) Bacteroids in the rhizobium‐legume symbiosis inhabit a plant internal lytic compartment: implications for other microbial endosymbioses. J Exp Bot 40: 831–839 [Google Scholar]
- Müller V, Chowdhury NP, Basen M (2018) Electron bifurcation: a long‐hidden energy‐coupling mechanism. Annu Rev Microbiol 72: 331–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nellen‐Anthamatten D, Rossi P, Preisig O, Kullik I, Babst M, Fischer HM, Hennecke H (1998) Bradyrhizobium japonicum FixK2, a crucial distributor in the FixLJ‐dependent regulatory cascade for control of genes inducible by low oxygen levels. J Bacteriol 180: 5251–5255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ochsner AM, Christen M, Hemmerle L, Peyraud R, Christen B, Vorholt JA (2017) Transposon sequencing uncovers an essential regulatory function of phosphoribulokinase for Methylotrophy. Curr Biol 27: 2579–2588.e6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Opijnen T, Bodi KL, Camilli A (2009) Tn‐seq: high‐throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat Methods 6: 767–772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pecrix Y, Staton SE, Sallet E, Lelandais‐Brière C, Moreau S, Carrère S, Blein T, Jardinaud MF, Latrasse D, Zouine M et al (2018) Whole‐genome landscape of Medicago truncatula symbiotic genes. Nat Plants 4: 1017–1025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Polacco JC, Mazzafera P, Tezotto T (2013) Opinion – Nickel and urease in plants: Still many knowledge gaps. Plant Sci 199–200: 79–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Preisig O, Anthamatten D, Hennecke H (1993) Genes for a microaerobically induced oxidase complex in Bradyrhizobium japonicum are essential for a nitrogen‐fixing endosymbiosis. PNAS 90: 3309–3313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prell J, Poole P (2006) Metabolic changes of rhizobia in legume nodules. Trends Microbiol 14: 161–168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Québatte M, Christen M, Harms A, Körner J, Christen B, Dehio C (2017) Gene transfer agent promotes evolvability within the fittest subpopulation of a bacterial pathogen. Cell Syst 4: 611–621.e6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Regensburger B, Hennecke H (1983) RNA polymerase from Rhizobium japonicum . Arch Microbiol 135: 103–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roux B, Rodde N, Jardinaud MF, Timmers T, Sauviac L, Cottret L, Carrère S, Sallet E, Courcelle E, Moreau S et al (2014) An integrated analysis of plant and bacterial gene expression in symbiotic root nodules using laser‐capture microdissection coupled to RNA sequencing. Plant J 77: 817–837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salminen SO, Streeter JG (1990) Factors contributing to the accumulation of glutamate in Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroids under microaerobic conditions. Microbiology 136: 2119–2126 [Google Scholar]
- Salminen SO, Streeter JG (1992) Labeling of carbon pools in Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Rhizobium leguminosarum bv viciae Bacteroids following incubation of intact nodules with 14CO2 . Plant Physiol 100: 597–604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarma AD, Emerich DW (2005) Global protein expression pattern of Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroids: a prelude to functional proteomics. Proteomics 5: 4170–4184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schlüter J‐P, Reinkensmeier J, Barnett MJ, Lang C, Krol E, Giegerich R, Long SR, Becker A (2013) Global mapping of transcription start sites and promoter motifs in the symbiotic α‐proteobacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021. BMC Genom 14: 1–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schnabel E, Mukherjee A, Smith L, Kassaw T, Long S, Frugoli J (2010) The lss supernodulation mutant of Medicago truncatula reduces expression of the SUNN gene. Plant Physiol 154: 1390–1402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seefeldt LC, Hoffman BM, Dean DR (2009) Mechanism of Mo‐dependent nitrogenase. Annu Rev Biochem 78: 701–722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sippel D, Einsle O (2017) The structure of vanadium nitrogenase reveals an unusual bridging ligand. Nat Chem Biol 13: 956–960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Socolow RH (1999) Nitrogen management and the future of food: lessons from the management of energy and carbon. PNAS 96: 6001–6008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka K, Matsuno E, Shimizu E, Shibai H, Yorifuji T (2001) Purification and characterization of aminopropionaldehyde dehydrogenase from Arthrobacter sp. TMP‐1. FEMS Microbiol Lett 195: 191–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Temme K, Zhao D, Voigt CA (2012) Refactoring the nitrogen fixation gene cluster from klebsiella oxytoca. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 7085–7090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Udvardi M, Poole PS (2013) Transport and metabolism in legume‐rhizobia symbioses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64: 781–805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Udvardi MK, Kahn ML (1993) Evolution of the (Brady) rhizobium‐legume symbiosis: why do bacteroids fix nitrogen? Symbiosis 14: 87–101 [Google Scholar]
- Vincent JM (1970) A manual for the practical study of the root‐nodule bacteria. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; [Google Scholar]
- Wang L, Zhang L, Liu Z, Zhao D, Liu X, Zhang B, Xie J, Hong Y, Li P, Chen S et al (2013) A minimal nitrogen fixation gene cluster from Paenibacillus sp. WLY78 enables expression of active nitrogenase in Escherichia coli . PLoS Genet 9: e1003865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waters JK, Hughes BL, Purcell LC, Gerhardt KO, Mawhinney TP, Emerich DW (1998) Alanine, not ammonia, is excreted from N2‐fixing soybean nodule bacteroids. PNAS 95: 12038–12042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watson RJ, Chan YK, Wheatcroft R, Yang AF, Han SH (1988) Rhizobium meliloti genes required for C4‐dicarboxylate transport and symbiotic nitrogen fixation are located on a megaplasmid. J Bacteriol 170: 927–934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winter G, Todd CD, Trovato M, Forlani G, Funck D (2015) Physiological implications of arginine metabolism in plants. Front Plant Sci 6: 1005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Z, Lu C‐D (2007a) Functional genomics enables identification of genes of the arginine transaminase pathway in Pseudomonas aeruginosa . J Bacteriol 189: 3945–3953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Z, Lu C‐D (2007b) Characterization of an arginine: pyruvate transaminase in arginine catabolism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J Bacteriol 189: 3954–3959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J, Xie X, Xiang N, Tian Z‐X, Dixon R, Wang Y‐P (2018) Polyprotein strategy for stoichiometric assembly of nitrogen fixation components for synthetic biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115: E8509–E8517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yurgel SN, Kahn ML (2004) Dicarboxylate transport by rhizobia. J Exp Bot 28: 489–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao H, Li M, Fang K, Chen W, Wang J (2012) In silico insights into the symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Sinorhizobium meliloti via metabolic reconstruction. PLoS One 7: e31287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Appendix
Expanded View Figures PDF
Dataset EV1
Dataset EV2
Dataset EV3
Dataset EV4
Dataset EV5
Source Data for Appendix
Review Process File
Source Data for Figure 1
Source Data for Figure 2
Source Data for Figure 3
Source Data for Figure 4
Source Data for Table 1
Data Availability Statement
The datasets produced and presented in this study are available as [Link], [Link], [Link], [Link], [Link].