Abstract
Background
The Hands-On Surgical Training in Congenital Heart Surgery (HOST-CHS) program using 3D printed heart models has received positive feedback from attendees. However, improvements were necessary in the simulator set up to replicate the ergonomics experienced in the operating room. This paper illustrates the development of a dynamic chest wall and operating table simulator to enhance the simulation experience.
Methods
The simulator was designed to address the limitations with the existing set up. This included a suboptimal operating position, unrealistic surgical exposure and limitations in illuminating the operative field and recording procedures. A combination of computer-aided design and various 3D-printing techniques were used to build the components. The simulator’s usefulness was evaluated by surgeons who attended the 5th annual HOST course via a questionnaire.
Results
The simulator consists of three components; an operating table simulator which allows height adjustment and pitch-and-roll motion; a suture retraction disc, which holds sutures under tension to improve exposure; and a pediatric chest wall cavity to replicate a surgeon’s access experience during surgery. Nineteen surgeons completed the questionnaire. All surgeons agreed that the addition of the simulator was acceptable for surgical simulation and that it helped replicate the ergonomics experienced in the operating room.
Conclusions
The inclusion of the HOST-CHS simulator adds value to simulation in congenital heart surgery (CHS) as it replicates the view and exposure a surgeon experiences. Improvements like these will help develop high-fidelity simulation programs in CHS, which could be utilized to train surgeons globally.
Keywords: Congenital heart surgery, Surgical simulation, 3D-printing, Chest wall simulator
Introduction
Simulation is emerging as a tool to compliment surgical training and skill acquisition in congenital heart surgery (CHS), however its widespread use is limited [1–5]. The Hands-On Surgical Training in Congenital Heart Surgery (HOST-CHS) program uses 3D-printed heart models to simulate the technically complex operations required to treat congenital heart diseases. Despite the positive feedback from attendee surgeons improvements were necessary in the simulator set up to replicate the ergonomics experienced in the operating room [1, 2].
Limitations of HOST-CHS set up
Four aspects were identified as limitations of the original set up for the HOST-CHS course (Fig. 1):
Suboptimal operating position – 3D-printed heart models were fixed to the table with tape limiting operating height. Subsequently surgeons were prevented from operating at the ideal height. Models were also unable to be rotated to improve exposure of the operative field.
Unrealistic surgical exposure – The absence of a chest wall allowed surgeons to operate from any angle, when in reality surgeons operate within a fixed region (i.e. median sternotomy incision).
Limitations in light exposure – Although commercially available headlights were used, the battery life limited the duration of the light’s effectiveness during simulation.
Difficulties in video-recording for accurate objective assessment
Fig. 1.
a A surgeon simulating a complex congenital heart surgical procedure on a 3D-printed heart model at the hands-on surgical training (HOST) course. b A congenital heart surgeon demonstrating the arterial switch operation on a 3D-printed heart model at the HOST course. Note that the models are stuck to the table at a fixed height forcing the surgeon to sit down preventing them from using their surgical loupes. A simple headlight is used to illuminate the model. The procedure is video recorded for retrospective assessment (not shown)
This paper illustrates the development of a dynamic chest wall and operating table simulator to enhance the simulation experience.
Components for the Hands-On Surgical Training-Congenital Heart Surgery (HOST-CHS) simulator (Fig. 2)
Fig. 2.
The components used for the Hands-On Surgical Training - Congenital Heart Surgery (HOST-CHS) simulator. a: Commercially available scissor lift (LBJSET - United Scientific Supplies Inc., Waukegan, IL, USA). b: Roll and pitch 3D-printed components. c: Commercially available cam handles with internal thread (McMaster Carr, Inc., Cleveland, OH). d: Suture retraction disk. e: Chest wall with median sternotomy incision, f: Silicone skin, g: Upper and lower brackets which secure the silicone skin in place, h: Lower holder with notches at five different levels to fit all 3D printed heart models used during the HOST course
Operating table simulator
A scissor-lift (LBJSET - United Scientific Supplies Inc., Waukegan, IL, USA) forms the lowest aspect of the simulator and has a dial mechanism to adjust the height of the models. Lighting and recording devices are attached to the top platform to allow surgical procedures to be recorded (Fig. 3). Roll and pitch components were designed on SolidWorks™ (Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks, Concord, MA) and 3D-printed on the Objet 500 Connex3 (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN) using VeroWhitePlus resin material and is attached to the scissor lift. This design utilizes perpendicular hinges to allow 30-degree angle rotation in all directions. Clamping handles are used to lock the chest simulator in the desired position and are easily adjustable.
Fig. 3.
a: The complete assembly up of the Hands On Surgical Training in Congenital Heart Surgery (HOST-CHS) simulator. This assembly includes the pediatric chest wall cavity, suture retraction disk, roll and pitch components, operating table simulator, a webcam and lighting equipment. b A surgeon suturing a transannular patch on a tetralogy of Fallot 3D-printed heart model through the sternotomy incision of the HOST-CHS simulator. The 3D-printed heart model has been placed at the optimized height inside the holder, while the surgeon utilizes the suture retraction disk
Suture retraction disk
During a surgical procedure, the surgeon needs the ability for sutures to be held securely, whilst they focus on another aspect of the operation. A suture retraction disc was designed with 24 equally spaced slits around the circumference to allow sutures of different sizes to be held securely in place and is attached to the top of the pitch and roll mechanism.
Pediatric Chest Wall cavity
An anatomically accurate pediatric chest wall cavity was designed and 3D-printed to reproduce the surgeon’s access experienced during CHS. Dimensions were retrieved by computer-tomography images. Silicon was molded around the cavity to simulate patients’ skin (Dragon Skin 20 - Smooth-On Inc., Easton, PA). A lower holder completed the simulator with 5 various height levels, designed to fit all the 3D-printed heart models used during the HOST program. These components were 3D-printed on the Fortus380mc (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, MN) printer using ABS M30i filament. Video 1 demonstrates the assembly, functions and use of the simulator.
Additional file 1 Video 1: Demonstration of the chest wall simulator being assembled, the degrees of motion, suture retraction and a surgeon performing a transannular patch reconstruction as part of a tetralogy of Fallot repair on a 3D-printed heart model.
The simulator was first trialled at the annual HOST course of the authors’ institution with 19 cardiovascular surgeons participating. Surgeons’ experience in CHS varied from resident surgeons to staff/consultant level. All surgeons agreed that the addition of the simulator was acceptable for surgical simulation and that it helped replicate the surgical ergonomics. All agreed that the simulator would encourage practice outside of a dedicated course and would be keen to use it more if made available (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Questionnaire responses on the usefulness of the Hands-On Surgical Training in Congenital Heart Surgery (HOST-CHS) simulator by the congenital heart surgeons that participated in the 5th annual HOST course
Discussion
With the growing expectation of perfect patient outcomes, there is a need for improved training methods by implementing simulation in CHS [2]. By producing a simulator that can be used in any environment, surgeons are able to rehearse technically challenging procedures in inconsequential environments. Simulators have been shown to be effective in training and have been successfully incorporated into national training programs in adult cardiothoracic surgery [6–8]. However, within CHS there is a clear gap in simulation, where one could argue the need is greater due to the high stakes involved and the complexity/limitation of cases [2].
The development of the HOST-CHS simulator was successful in addressing the requirements set by the surgeons’ recommendations. The operating table component allowed the surgeon to set a personalized height and control the roll, pitch and tilting motions to reproduce the real ergonomics. The suture retraction disk improved surgical exposure and the overall design allowed for the inclusion of lighting and recording equipment. The chest wall component restricted the surgeons approach to the heart model, which replicates reality.
The feedback from the participant surgeons was encouraging with all grades of surgeon agreeing that the inclusion of the simulator was acceptable for the simulation of CHS and that it helps replicate the ergonomics experienced in the operating room. All surgeons agreed that the simulator would encourage simulation outside of dedicated courses and were likely to incorporate it into their own institution if made available. The number of participants who completed this questionnaire may be a limitation, however the overall consensus from this study strongly suggests that the incorporation of the HOST-CHS chest simulator as part of the HOST program is beneficial to the overall simulation experience.
Future directions
With the increasing trend towards minimally invasive surgery, simulators will be required to validate and improve methods prior to real-life surgery. Within our institution, we are developing a chest wall simulator designed specifically for minimally-invasive congenital heart surgery (Fig. 5). This simulator will allow staff surgeons to rehearse operations and teach new techniques, which will be increasingly difficult to do in reality. Current limitations in the 3D-printing techniques and materials limits the inclusion of flow circuits with 3D-printed heart models, however there have been attempts to overcome this making it a tangible reality [2]. It is expected that with the ongoing improvements in print materials, this is the next step in simulation.
Fig. 5.
Computer render of a minimally invasive dynamic chest wall and operating table simulator. Note the absence of a median sternotomy incision and the inclusion of a mini-thoracotomy incision the surgeon will operate through. The opposite side of the chest is removed to allow the teacher to observe the performance of the surgeon
Conclusion
The inclusion of the HOST-CHS simulator adds value to simulation in congenital heart surgery as it replicates the view and exposure a surgeon experiences. With training limitations being a global problem for congenital heart surgeons it is expected that simulators like these will be increasingly utilized in surgical training.
Acknowledgements
The Cardiac 3D Printing Program at the Hospital for Sick Children is generously supported through the work of Mr. Peter (TOF 1959) and Mrs. Fabiola Butler.
Abbreviations
- HOST-CHS
Hands-on surgical training in congenital heart surgery
- CHS
Congenital heart surgery
- HOST
Hands-on surgical training
- 3D
Three-dimensional
Authors’ contributions
BP is the 3D printing engineer at the Hospital for Sick Children. With a background of mechanical engineering, BP developed the 3D-printed parts required to build the chest wall simulator. BP and NH wrote the manuscript. PVN used computer-aided design and 3D printing to develop the novel mechanism that allows the chest wall to rotate and developed the overall simulator. OH is the lead surgeon on this project and with NH tested the prototypes and gave feedback for further iterations. SJY heads the 3D printing program in our institution and helped developed prototypes and critically reviewed the manuscript prior to submission. NH developed the idea and lead the project and was involved in every step of the process, from acquiring funding, development and validation. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Labatt Family Heart Centre Innovation Grant, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Informed and written consent was obtained prior to surgeon participation in the Hands-on Surgical Training (HOST) course. Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Board of the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Research Ethics Board (REB) number: 1000060696.
Consent for publication
All attendees to the HOST course gave written consent for publication of results.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s41205-020-00067-4.
References
- 1.Yoo SJ, Spray T, Austin EH, Yun TJ, van Arsdell GS. Hands-on surgical training of congenital heart surgery using 3-dimensional print models. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153(6):1530–1540. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hussein N, Honjo O, Haller C, et al. Hands-On Surgical Simulation in Congenital Heart Surgery: Literature Review and Future Perspective. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32(1):98–105. 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Hussein N, Honjo O, Haller C, et al. Quantitative assessment of technical performance during hands-on surgical training of the arterial switch operation using 3-dimensional printed heart models. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;S0022-5223(19):39877. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.123. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4.Mavroudis CD, Mavroudis C, Jacobs JP, DeCampli WM, Tweddell JS. Simulation and deliberate practice in a porcine model for congenital heart surgery training. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(2):637–643. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Scanlan AB, et al. Comparison of 3D echocardiogram-derived 3D printed valve models to molded models for simulated repair of pediatric Atrioventricular valves. Pediatr Cardiol. 2018;39(3):538–547. doi: 10.1007/s00246-017-1785-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Feins RH, et al. Annals of thoracic surgery. 2017. Simulation-based training in cardiac surgery. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Trehan K, Kemp CD, Yang SC. Simulation in cardiothoracic surgical training: where do we stand? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(1):18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moorjani N, Lewis M, Shah R, Barnard S, Graham T, Rathinam S. Implementation of a novel portfolio of structured, curriculum-aligned, simulation-based, cardiothoracic surgery training courses: evolving the delivery of surgical education. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154(6):2009–2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.