Skip to main content
Wolters Kluwer - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wolters Kluwer - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 May 19;273(2):e39–e40. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004091

COVID-19 and Elective Surgery

7 Practical Tips for a Safe, Successful, and Sustainable Reboot

Zhen Chang Liang , Mark Seng Ye Chong , Gabriel Ka Po Liu , Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle , Dahui Wang , Xuemin Lyu §, Chih-Hung Chang ¶,||, Tae-Joon Cho ∗∗, Steven B Haas , Dale Fisher ∗∗,||, Diarmuid Murphy , James Hoi Po Hui
PMCID: PMC7268862  PMID: 32433295

The COVID-19 pandemic has thrown surgical systems worldwide into unprecedented disarray. Elective surgery has stopped to preserve scarce healthcare resources and aid in redeployment of staff to areas where they are most needed. Some surgical disciplines, for example, Orthopaedics have been affected more than others. The COVID-19 crisis is anticipated to remain with us for an extended period of time. An indefinite suspension of elective surgery is not practical as this would have far-reaching and deleterious implications on patient care. Equally important, the financial sustainability of healthcare systems would be severely stressed. In this perspective, we provide 7 practical tips, to be considered in stepwise progression, for healthcare systems looking to reboot their elective surgeries in a safe, successful, and sustainable manner.

KNOW WHERE YOU ARE ON THE EPIDEMIC CURVE

Work with your local health authorities, hospitals, and epidemiologists. Understand where your county/state/country is on the epidemic curve.1 Electives should preferably only start when the epidemic curve is flat, with no upsurge/spikes in new infections and when community spread is minimal or controlled. This is to avoid inadvertent introduction of COVID 19 into an over-burdened hospital system. Take time to monitor the local situation before committing to restarting elective work. This will allow for any reporting delays which can mislead us into believing an outbreak is over before it truly is. History is a great teacher. The 1918 flu pandemic comprised of 3 waves; the second wave being more deadly than the first.2 We would do well to learn from the lessons of our past.

ENSURE ACCESS TO RELIABLE AND ACCESSIBLE COVID-19 SCREENING

One of the major difficulties in controlling COVID-19 is of spread through asymptomatic patients. No amount of screening for temperature, upper respiratory tract symptoms, or recent travel will reduce this risk. A prerequisite for return to elective surgery is the availability of a reliable screening test(s) for COVID -19. This should form the cornerstone of a safe and successful reboot. Screening should not overtly burden local laboratories. The gold standard in screening is the Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) based naso/oro-pharyngeal swab. This evaluates for the presence of viral RNA, has a sensitivity and specificity of >90% and is quintessential for the detection of acute, even asymptomatic COVID-19 infection.3 These tests may be harder to come by given acute shortages of key reagents as the pandemic wages on.

Rapid serology tests that detect the presence of COVID-19 antibodies may be less reliable given that results depend on the individual's immune response. Acute, asymptomatic, and milder infections may potentially be missed, putting the safety of surgical teams and healthcare personnel at risk.3 It is also unknown if the presence of antibodies confer immunity and protect against re-infection. Some hospitals in Beijing have adopted a combination of serology tests and computed tomography chest to screen elective patients. In South Korea, patients are screened using only RT-PCR swabs within 1–2 days of their elective procedures. It is imperative to note that the longer the lag time between screening and surgery, the higher the risk for error.

Healthcare workers must have ready access to COVID-19 testing. Defined protocols must be established, before elective surgery “reboot,” which enables ease of contact tracing and quarantine measures for any symptomatic/infected staff and their close contacts. Contingency plans should also be developed for “worst case scenarios,” involving outbreaks affecting staff and patients in elective wards.

UNDERSTAND HOSPITAL RESOURCES

Screening is of little value without adequate hospital infrastructure and manpower support. Surgery requires a team effort, and a successful reboot plan requires a coordinated effort amongst all stakeholders, from hospital leadership right down to logistical staff. Hospitals should plan for pandemic-ready Operating Rooms (ORs), an adequate number of isolation beds, retrofitted elective wards to allow for safe distancing, a steady Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supply, and rejuvenated trained staff. Importantly, a ready supply of anaesthetic drugs needs to be secured before electives can reasonably resume. This may be challenging given anticipated shortages with the increasing number of ventilated COVID patients.4 Elective work should not, under any circumstances, compromise care for patients with emergent/urgent conditions. Hospitals must not be left surviving on crisis mode. The resources must be available for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative surgical precautions to be undertaken as strictly as possible to prevent cross-contamination and nosocomial infection.5

ENSURE APPROPRIATE CASE SELECTION AND PRIORITIZATION

Elective cases must be prioritized and this should preferably be coordinated by a centralized committee. Principles of prioritization6 include clinical urgency, extent of utility of hospital resources, for example, intensive care unit beds, severity of disabling symptoms, history of previous cancellations, and patient demographics. Objective scoring systems such as the Medically Necessary Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) instrument can be useful for this purpose.7 Ideal priority cases to kickstart the rebooting process are patients who are young (few comorbidities) with disabling symptoms in whom an uncomplicated and early discharge is anticipated.

OPTIMIZE THE PATIENT'S POST-DISCHARGE PLANNING

Agree on a rehabilitation plan with the patient before surgery. Patients should ideally require minimal rehabilitation, or undergo rehabilitation protocols that can be easily supervised at home via online platforms. Technology should be leveraged for this purpose. Avoid discharging patients to rehabilitation facilities or nursing homes. They can be potential hotbeds for COVID spread and transmission.8

START SMALL, STAY CURRENT, AND BE ADAPTABLE

Start small and aim for a gradual ramp-up in caseload and services. A 10%–20% capacity goal is reasonable in the initial reboot phase. Begin with ambulatory cases before considering inpatient admissions. Avoid overlapping surgery given its potential risk of cross-contamination. Scale up or down accordingly depending on the local COVID situation. Be prepared to tap on and off the brakes, until an effective vaccine is developed or herd immunity has been achieved.9 Stay current with the latest COVID-19 literature, monitor your outcomes, for example, complication rates and adapt your practices accordingly.

BE PREPARED FOR ROADBLOCKS AHEAD

Medical hurdles aside, financial and legal roadblocks can easily derail any plans for a successful and sustainable reboot. Be mindful of increased costs against a reduced bottom line. With the surge in demand, costs can quickly escalate from PPE requirements, COVID screening, tests and the need for repeated facility sanitization and disinfection.10 These additional costs may not necessarily be covered by existing insurance or even by governmental aid. Furthermore, departments may come under pressure from hospital administrators to ramp up their elective work as this is the main source of revenue for the hospital. Rebooting should follow a logical stepwise progression. It must be acknowledged that recommencing elective work is not without risks and potential legal ramifications. What if a patient or staff contracts a nosocomial infection and decides to seek legal redress? Pre-planning should help minimize these risks. Again, the challenge is not with re-initiating the reboot. The key lies in its safe sustainability.

Restarting elective surgery is an eventuality which we will all have to embrace. Rather than sweep it under the carpet, we need to begin facilitating the tough conversations to ensure its success. The key challenges lie in deciding on the optimal timing, working within limitations, at the same time ensuring the safety of healthcare workers and patients involved. Start small and stay nimble. Be prepared for potential financial and legal setbacks. Reboot safely, and see you on the other side.

REFERENCES


Articles from Annals of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES