Abstract
To date, there is no licensed treatment or approved vaccine to combat the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), and the number of new cases and mortality multiplies every day. Therefore, it is essential to develop an effective treatment strategy to control the virus spread and prevent the disease. Here, we summarized the therapeutic approaches that are used to treat this infection. Although it seems that antiviral drugs are effective in improving clinical manifestation, there is no definite treatment protocol. Lymphocytopenia, excessive inflammation, and cytokine storm followed by acute respiratory distress syndrome are still unsolved issues causing the severity of this disease. Therefore, immune response modulation and inflammation management can be considered as an essential step. There is no doubt that more studies are required to clarify immunopathogenesis and immune response; however, new therapeutic approaches including mesenchymal stromal cell and immune cell therapy showed inspiring results.
Keywords: COVID-19, Coronavirus, Therapeutic approaches, Severe acute respiratory syndrome, Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Cell therapy
Introduction
Corona viruses are a large family of enveloped, positive-sense RNA viruses that have the largest RNA genome (rage from 26 to 32 kb) [1, 2]. Several coronavirus epidemics such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) have occurred during the past years [2, 3]. At the end of 2019, a novel coronavirus infection named coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) was first identified in Wuhan, China [4–7]. Due to the fast transmission, it is reported in almost all countries and has become a global crisis. Therefore, COVID-19 pandemic becomes an international threat for human health and economy [1, 8].
COVID-19 spreads fast among people and the mortality rate is controversial; however, it was less than 2% in some studies. The main manifestations of the disease include fever, dry caught, headache, shortness of breath, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), septic shock, and even death [3, 11, 12].
The genome sequencing of this virus revealed more than 82% identity to SARS-CoV [9]. Analysis indicated that the binding affinity of virus S protein to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on human alveolar epithelial cells is higher compared with the SARS-CoV [10].
Since SARS-CoV-2 is a new pathogen, little is known about it. Moreover, there is no licensed treatment or approved vaccine and the number of new cases and mortality multiplies daily [8]. Therefore, it is vital to develop an effective treatment strategy to control the virus spread and prevent the disease [1, 11].
Immunopathogenesis of COVID-19
Although the pathogenesis of this disease has not been fully understood, it seems that the host immune responses play an important role. Aberrant host immune response causes lung tissue damage, reduced lung capacity, and finally respiratory failure [4]. Studies indicated that dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages are playing crucial role in innate immune responses [12, 13]. These cells produce inflammatory cytokines and chemokines including TNF-α, IL-12, IL-6, IFNγ, and IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1), macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) [6, 14]. These inflammatory responses may lead to systemic inflammation [6, 7, 13, 14].
Adoptive immunity plays a major role in viral infections [15]. Cytotoxic T cells (CD8+ T cells) are the main T cell subsets that destroy infected cells [16]. Therefore, the number of these cells is one of the major factors for clearance of the viral infection [17, 18]. Preliminarily, it was indicated that the number of total T cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, reduced significantly in COVID-19 patients. This decrease was more intensive in ICU admitted patients compared with that in non-ICU admitted individuals [19]. It is also reported that T cell clonal exhaustion occurred during the infection and the expression of certain T cell surface markers like PD1 (programmed cell death protein 1) and TIM-3 (T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing molecule-3) markedly increased [19, 20]. The cytokine storm occurred in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection that led to increased expression of NKG2A (natural-killer group 2, member A) on cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) and NK cells. This upregulation suppressed CTL and NK function and cytokine secretion [19, 21, 22]. It is suggested that inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α and IL-6, mainly originated from apoptotic monocytes (CD14+CD16+) and macrophages and induced T CD4+ and T CD8+ cells [19, 23]. These excessive inflammatory responses might result in respiratory system pathology and dysfunction [23].
Perhaps it takes many years to achieve a specific and effective therapeutic protocol, efficient vaccine, or suitable medicine for the treatment of COVID-19. There is a wide range of existing and current treatment strategies categorized into antiviral drugs, immunotherapy protocols including convalescent serum and monoclonal antibodies, cell-based therapies, hydroxychloroquine, Chinese medicine, and steroids (just for patients who suffer from ARDS) [24]. A schematic figure (Fig. 1) summarized the novel therapeutic approaches in treatment of COVID-19 patients. Moreover, there are a growing number of clinical trials registered for the treatment of COVID-19 (Table 1).
Table 1.
Group | Therapeutic agent | Example of clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CT number | Country | Recruitment status | Phase | ||
Serum | Convalescent serum | NCT04327349 | Iran | Enrolling by invitation | Phase I |
Convalescent plasma | NCT04372979 | France | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
NCT04343755 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04363034 | USA | Available | NA | ||
NCT04333355 | Mexico | Recruiting | Phase I | ||
Inactivated convalescent plasma | NCT04292340 | China | Recruiting | Phase I | |
Immunoglobulin of cured patients | NCT04264858 | China | Not yet recruiting | NA | |
Immunoglobulins obtained with DFPP | NCT04346589 | Italy | Recruiting | NA | |
Monoclonal antibodies | Tocilizumab | NCT04322773 | Denmark | Recruiting | Phase II |
NCT04317092 | Italy | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04331795 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04377659 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04345445 | Malaysia | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | ||
Sarilumab | NCT04315298 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II/III | |
NCT04324073 | France | Recruiting | Phase II/III | ||
Avdoralimab | NCT04371367 | France | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Gimsilumab | NCT04351243 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Siltuximab | NCT04329650 | Spain | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Bevacizumab | NCT04275414 | China | Recruiting | Phase II/III | |
Eculizumab | NCT04288713 | USA | Available | Phase I | |
Emapalumab | NCT04324021 | Sweden | Recruiting | Phase II/III | |
Clazakizumab | NCT04381052 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
Canakinumab | NCT04362813 | USA, Spain, UK | Recruiting | Phase III | |
NCT04348448 | Italy | Not yet recruiting | NA | ||
Olokizumab | NCT04380519 | Russia | Recruiting | Phase II/III | |
Otilimab | NCT04376684 | UK | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
Sirukumab | NCT04380961 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Emapalumab | NCT04324021 | Sweden | Recruiting | Phase II/III | |
Lenzilumab | NCT04351152 | USA | Recruiting | Phase III | |
Leronlimab | NCT04343651 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Ravulizumab | NCT04369469 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
Nivolumab | NCT04343144 | France | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Meplazumab | NCT04275245 | China | Recruiting | Phase I/II | |
CD24Fc | NCT04317040 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
TJ003234 | NCT04341116 | USA | Recruiting | Phase I/II | |
IC14 | NCT04346277 | Italy | Available | NA | |
Anakinra | NCT04362111 | UK | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
Anakinra vs. siltuximab vs. tocilizumab | NCT04330638 | Belgium | Recruiting | Phase III | |
Interferons | IFN-α | NTC04320236 | China | Recruiting | Phase III |
Interferon beta-1A | NCT04350671 | Iran | Enrolling by invitation | Phase IV | |
Recombinant human interferon α1β | NCT04293887 | China | Not yet recruiting | Early Phase I | |
Recombinant human interferon alpha-1b | NCT04320238 | China | Recruiting | Phase III | |
Peginterferon lambda-1a | NCT04331899 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Pegylated interferon lambda | NCT04343976 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
NK cells | NK cells | NCT04280224 | China | Recruiting | Phase I |
NCT04344548 | Colombia | Not yet recruiting | Phase I/II | ||
iPSC-derived NK cells | NCT04324996 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase I | |
IL15-NK cells vs. NKG2D CAR-NK cells vs. ACE2 CAR-NK cells vs. NKG2D-ACE2 CAR-NK cells | NCT04324996 | China | Recruiting | Phase I/II | |
CYNK-001 | NCT04365101 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase I/II | |
Kinase inhibitors | Ruxolitinib | NCT04362137 | UK | Recruiting | Phase III |
NCT04348071 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II/III | ||
NCT04355793 | USA | Available | NA | ||
NCT04354714 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04377620 | USA | Recruiting | Phase III | ||
Baricitinib | NCT04340232 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II/III | |
NCT04358614 | Italy | Completed | Phase II/III | ||
NCT04346147 | Spain | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
Acalabrutinib | NCT04346199 | Spain | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
NCT04380688 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
Duvelisib | NCT04372602 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Tofacitinib | NCT04332042 | Italy | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Imatinib | NCT04346147 | Spain | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Ibrutinib | NCT04375397 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Nintedanib | NCT04338802 | China | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Other immunosuppressors | Fingolimod | NCT04280588 | China | Recruiting | Phase II |
Sirolimus | NCT04341675 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Tacrolimus | NCT04341038 | Spain | Recruiting | Phase III | |
Lenalidomide | NCT04361643 | Spain | Not yet recruiting | Phase IV | |
Methotrexate | NCT04352465 | Brazil | Not yet recruiting | Phase I/II | |
Antivirals | Remdesivir | NCT04292899 | USA | Recruiting | Phase III |
NCT04280705 | USA | Recruiting | Phase III | ||
NCT04365725 | France | Available | NA | ||
Favipiravir | NCT04336904 | Italy | Active, not recruiting | Phase III | |
NCT04346628 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04349241 | Egypt | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | ||
Umifenovir | NCT04350684 | Iran | Enrolling by invitation | Phase IV | |
Abidol hydrochloride vs. oseltamivir vs. lopinavir/ritonavir | NCT04255017 | China | Recruiting | Phase IV | |
Lopinavir/ritonavir | NCT04330690 | Canada | Recruiting | Phase II | |
NCT04307693 | Korea | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04346147 | Spain | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04328285 | France | Recruiting | Phase III | ||
Galidesivir | NCT03891420 | Brazil | Recruiting | Phase I | |
Danoprevir, ritonavir | NCT04345276 | China | Recruiting | Phase IV | |
Darunavir/cobicistat | NCT04252274 | China | Recruiting | Phase III | |
Virazole | NCT04356677 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase I | |
Clevudine | NCT04347915 | Korea | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Nitazoxanide | NCT04348409 | Brazil | Recruiting | NA | |
NCT04359680 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | ||
Hydroxychloroquine | NCT04329611 | Canada | Recruiting | Phase III | |
NCT04323631 | Israel | Not yet recruiting | Early Phase I | ||
NCT04340544 | Germany | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | ||
NCT04345692 | USA | Recruiting | Phase III | ||
NCT04362332 | Netherlands | Recruiting | Phase IV | ||
Antibiotics | Azithromycin | NCT04332107 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase III |
Doxycycline | NCT04371952 | France | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
Carrimycin | NCT04286503 | China | Not yet recruiting | Phase IV | |
Decoy biomolecules | rhACE2, rhACE2 | NCT04287686 | China | Withdrawn | NA |
NCT04335136 | Austria, Denmark, Germany | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
rbACE2 | NCT04375046 | Egypt | Not yet recruiting | Phase I | |
PUL-042, PUL-042 | NCT04313023 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
NCT04312997 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
Rhu-pGSN | NCT04358406 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Piclidenoson | NCT04333472 | Israel | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
ACE inhibitors and AR blockers | Ramipril | NCT04366050 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II |
Valsartan | NCT04335786 | Netherlands | Recruiting | Phase IV | |
Losartan | NCT04335123 | USA | Recruiting | Phase I | |
Telmisartan | NCT04355936 | Argentina | Recruiting | Phase II | |
NCT04360551 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
MSC and other cells | Cardiosphere-derived cells | NCT04338347 | USA | Available | NA |
Dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells | NCT04302519 | China | Not yet recruiting | Phase I | |
Dental pulp stem cells | NCT04336254 | China | Recruiting | Phase I/II | |
MSC exosomes | NCT04276987 | China | Not yet recruiting | Phase I | |
MSC | NCT04252118 | China | Recruiting | Phase I | |
NCT04361942 | Spain | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04377334 | Germany | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
AD MSC | NCT04362189 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
NCT04352803 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase I | ||
NCT04366323 | Spain | Not yet recruiting | Phase I/II | ||
BM-MSC | NCT04346368 | China | Not yet recruiting | Phase I/II | |
NCT04345601 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Early Phase I | ||
UC-MSC | NCT04355728 | USA | Recruiting | Phase I/II | |
NCT04273646 | China | Not yet recruiting | NA | ||
NCT04333368 | France | Recruiting | Phase I/II | ||
NCT04269525 | China | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04339660 | China | Recruiting | Phase I/II | ||
NCT04366271 | Spain | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
WJ-MSC | NCT04313322 | Jordan | Recruiting | Phase I | |
Corticosteroids | Ciclesonide | NCT04330586 | Korea | Not yet recruiting | Phase II |
NCT04381364 | Sweden | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
Budesonide | NCT04355637 | Spain | Recruiting | Phase IV | |
Dexamethasone | NCT04325061 | Spain | Not yet recruiting | Phase IV | |
NCT04360876 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
Prednisone | NCT04344288 | France | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Prednisone vs. hydrocortisone | NCT04359511 | France | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
Methylprednisolone | NCT04273321 | China | Suspended | NA | |
NCT04274071 | USA | Completed | NA | ||
Methylprednisolone sodium succinate | NCT04343729 | Brazil | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Sedatives, antidepressants, neuroleptics | Chlorpromazine | NCT04366739 | France | Not yet recruiting | Phase III |
NCT04354805 | Egypt | Not yet recruiting | Phase I/II | ||
Thalidomide | NCT04273529 | China | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Fluvoxamine | NCT04342663 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Fluoxetine | NCT04377308 | USA | Recruiting | Phase IV | |
Dexmedetomidine | NCT04358627 | Spain | Not yet recruiting | NA | |
Others | Azoximer bromide | NCT0438177 | Russia | Recruiting | Phase II/III |
Etoposide | NCT04356690 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Bicalutamide | NCT04374279 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Selinexor | NCT04349098 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Melphalan | NCT04380376 | Russia | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Bromhexine | NCT04355026 | Slovenia | Recruiting | Phase IV | |
N-acetylcysteine | NCT04374461 | USA | Recruiting | Phase IV | |
Sargramostim | NCT04326920 | Belgium | Recruiting | Phase IV | |
Angiotensin peptide (1-7) derived plasma | NCT04375124 | Turkey | Recruiting | NA | |
Defibrotide | NCT04335201 | Italy | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Aviptadil | NCT04311697 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
Dornase alpha | NCT04355364 | France | Recruiting | Phase III | |
Nafamostat mesilate | NCT04352400 | Italy | Not yet recruiting | Phase II/III | |
Camostat mesilate | NCT04321096 | Denmark | Not yet recruiting | Phase I/II | |
NCT04353284 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | ||
Almitrine | NCT04357457 | France | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
Sildenafil citrate | NCT04304313 | China | Recruiting | Phase III | |
Progesterone | NCT04365127 | USA | Recruiting | Phase I | |
Colchicine | NCT04375202 | Italy | Recruiting | Phase II | |
NCT04355143 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
Tetrandrine | NCT04308317 | China | Enrolling by invitation | Phase IV | |
Vazegepant | NCT04346615 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II/III | |
Dapagliflozin | NCT04350593 | USA | Recruiting | Phase III | |
Isotretinoin | NCT04361422 | Egypt | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
Deferoxamine | NCT04333550 | Iran | Recruiting | Phase I/II | |
SnPP protoporphyrin | NCT04371822 | Egypt | Not yet recruiting | Phase I | |
Ascorbic acid | NCT04363216 | USA | Not yet recruiting | Phase II | |
BACTEK-R | NCT04363814 | Spain | Not yet Recruiting | Phase III | |
Traditional Chinese medicine | NCT04323332 | China | Not yet recruiting | Phase III | |
Huaier granule | NCT04291053 | China | Not yet recruiting | Phase II/III | |
Combined | Favipiravir, hydroxychloroquine | NCT04359615 | Iran | Not yet recruiting | Phase IV |
NCT04376814 | Iran | Enrolling by invitation | NA | ||
Favipiravir, tocilizumab | NCT04310228 | China | Recruiting | NA | |
Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin | NCT04328272 | Pakistan | Not yet Recruiting | Phase III | |
NCT04329832 | USA | Recruiting | Phase II | ||
NCT04359316 | Iran | Not yet recruiting | Phase IV | ||
Hydroxychloroquine, nitazoxanide | NCT04361318 | Egypt | Not yet recruiting | Phase II/III | |
Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, tocilizumab | NCT04332094 | Spain | Recruiting | Phase II | |
Hydroxychloroquine vs. hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir vs. hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin | NCT04359095 | Colombia | Not yet recruiting | Phase II/III | |
Hydroxychloroquine, famotidine | NCT04370262 | USA | Recruiting | Phase III | |
Ivermectin, Nitazoxanide | NCT04360356 | Egypt | Not yet recruiting | Phase II/III | |
Lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, interferon beta-1B | NCT04276688 | China | Completed | Phase II | |
Met-enkephalin, tridecactide | NCT04374032 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Recruiting | Phase II/III |
ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme; AR angiotensin receptor; DFPP double-filtration plasmapheresis; MSC mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells; AD MSC adipose-derived MSC; BM-MSC bone marrow–derived MSC; UC-MSC umbilical cord–derived MSC; WJ-MSC Wharton jelly–derived MSC; NK cells natural killer cells; rhACE2 recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; rbACE2 recombinant bacterial angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; Rhu-pGSN recombinant human plasma gelsolin
Passive immunotherapy
Convalescent serum
Antibody injection to the patients and susceptible people provides rapid immunity to treat or prevent the disease [25–27]. Past experiences from SARS and MERS viral infections indicated that passive immunotherapy could be a potential treatment strategy for the patients [27–29]. It is considered that passive immunotherapy could also be beneficial in SARS-CoV-2 infection [30]. Extracting neutralizing antibodies from recovered individuals with high titer of antibodies in sera and transfusion to infected patient could deactivate the virus. However, neutralization activity of these antibodies is not fully understood. It has been showed that neutralizing antibodies are not long lasting and only the recently recovered patients are suitable candidates [31]. It has also been reported that the neutralizing antibody titers vary among the patients and elderly patients had higher antibody titer compared with young recovered individuals [32]. It is supposed that convalescent serum administration may induce phagocytosis and antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity [25, 27]. One important implications for using convalescent serum is the risk for antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) [33]. It is supposed that these neutralizing antibodies may enhance other viral infections [34]. Another major limitation of this strategy is donor shortage. However, by increasing the number of recovered individuals, this limitation would be solved [25].
Monoclonal antibodies
It has been shown that monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) could be an effective tool for the treatment of viral infectious diseases [35–37]. Different techniques have been used to develop mAbs including phage display library, hybridoma, single B cell isolation, and transgenic mice [37]. Various monoclonal antibodies developed against MERS and SARS infections include m396, 80R, and S3.1 against SARS and LCA60 for the treatment of MERS disease [29, 37–41]. These mAbs limited virus replication and facilitated lung recovery in animal models [42–44]. S protein is also the most immunogenic determinant of coronaviruses [40]. Several mAbs target receptor-binding domain (RBD) in the virus spike (S) glycoprotein and inhibit the virus to invade the host cell [9]. It is reported that mAbs against SARS-CoV-1 could cross react with SARS-CoV-2 [45]. It is indicated in the preprint that mAb 1A9 that targets the S protein of SARS-CoV-1 could interact with SARS-CoV-2 [46].
Tocilizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against IL-6 receptor cytokine. Tocilizumab targets both membrane and soluble-bound IL-6 receptors. This mAb is used for the treatment of COVID-19 patients [47]. It is shown that the IL-6 level is considerably high in severe COVID-19 cases. Treatment of 21 severe COVID-19 cases with tocilizumab indicated that using this monoclonal antibody is an effective treatment and well tolerated in these patients. In the preprinted study, tocilizumab caused body temperature and CRP returned to the normal levels and improved lung function [48]. There are also many registered clinical trials on efficiency and safety of tocilizumab for the treatment of COVID-19 (Table 1).
VEGF is one of the main mediators of vascular permeability and progression of ARDS. Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets VEGF and employed in a phase II/III clinical trial for the treatment of COVID-19 patients (NCT04275414).
As described earlier, during the SARS-CoV-2 infection, exhaustion of T and NK cells happens. In order to restore these cells, using monoclonal antibodies to block the PD-1/PD-L1 and TIM3 pathways may have beneficial therapeutic effects as well [49].
Kinase inhibitors
It is suggested that an inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) called baricitinib could prevent the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the host cells and also inhibit the inflammation [50, 51]. Cyclin G-associated kinase (GAK) and AP2-associated protein kinase 1 (AAK1) are endocytosis regulators. Baricitinib might inhibit SARS COV-2 entry by disruption of these regulators. Other JAK inhibitors such as fedratinib and ruxolitinib are also candidates for decreasing inflammatory cytokines in COVID-19 individuals [51]. Although JAK inhibitors have wide effects and can inhibit cytokine secretion such as IFN-α, more studies need to confirm their safety and efficiency [14].
Adoptive immunotherapy
Adoptive transfer of antigen-specific T cells has been developed for the treatment of cancers, autoimmunity, and viral infections including hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) [24–26]. In this approach, anti-viral-specific T cell clones are generated, expanded, and purified in vitro [26]. It is shown that engineered SARS-specific CD8+ T cells had normal activity and function and may be a potential therapeutic tool for SARS infection [27]. Recently, it has been indicated that the number of CD8+ T cells decreased dramatically and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cells increased during the SARS-CoV-2 infection. This decrease in the number of CD8+ lymphocytes has been correlated with the disease severity and clinical outcome [52]. It has also indicated that CD8+ T cells and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio decreased and increased respectively after the treatment. It seems that CD8+ T cells play an important role in COVID-19 and could be a potential biomarker of the disease [52, 53]. Due to these findings, adoptive transfer of COVID-19-specific CD8+ T cells may be an effective treatment strategy [28]. NK cells are innate immune cells that play a crucial role in host immune response after viral infections [54]. Preprinted studies indicated that NK cell population decreased remarkably during the disease [55, 56]. It has been indicated that during SARS-CoV-2 infection, increased amount of IL-6 inflammatory cytokine had negative correlation with the number of NK cells [52]. Thus, it is assumed that adoptive transfer of NK cells may have an effective therapeutic approach. Therefore, recently, an ongoing phase I clinical trial has been registered in which NK cell therapy in combination with conventional therapies for COVID-19 patients was proposed (NCT04280224). Altogether, it seems that cell-mediated immunity plays an important role in host immune response against SARS-CoV-2 [57].
Mesenchymal stromal cells
Persistence of inflammatory cytokines in COVID-19 patients leads to lung dysfunction and even death. Using corticosteroids for dampening cytokine storm suppresses immune system and makes delay in virus elimination [58].
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are characterized with their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties [59, 60]. Because of these characteristics, they have been used for the treatment of various inflammatory and autoimmune disorders including diabetes, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and multiple sclerosis [59]. It is proven that MSCs and MSC extracellular vesicle (EV) infusion have beneficial effects in the treatment of virus-induced pneumonia by reducing the lung inflammation [61, 62]. EVs are stable, could distribute to the lungs, and have the same immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties of parental MSCs [63]. MSCs decreased inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in animal model of avian influenza. They could also prevent immune cell infiltration into the lungs and improved alveolar injury [61]. Recently, there are studies evaluating allogenic MSCs and MSC-derived exosomes as potential therapeutic tools for reducing inflammation and improving COVID-19-related ARDS [47, 64]. It is indicated that adoptive transfer of allogenic umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) could inhibit inflammation and attenuate symptoms in patients with advanced COVID-19. Four days after cell therapy, patients are disconnected from the ventilator. UC-MSC therapy also elevated T cell numbers and boosted the immune system [58]. Administration of ACE negative MSCs to seven COVID-19 patients improved clinical symptoms with no side effects just 2 days after injection. The number of inflammatory cytokine secreting cells reduced significantly. Regulatory DC subpopulation (CD14+CD11c+CD11bmid) elevated. The levels of IL-10 anti-inflammatory cytokine increased while TNF-α decreased [65]. Infusion of MSCs also induced lung tissue regeneration by modulating inflammatory microenvironment in COVID-19 patients [66]. There are several ongoing clinical trials using different sources of MSCs for the treatment of COVID-19 (Table 1). Taken together, MSC therapy could inhibit excessive immune system reaction, modulate inflammatory milieu, and prevent virus-mediated cytokine storm [65]. It seems that MSC therapy could be a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of COVID-19 [64].
Nanomedicine
LIF (leukemia inhibitory factor) is one of the important cytokines to protect the respiratory system and promote lung homeostasis during viral infections [67, 68]. This cytokine modulates severe adverse events during ARDS [67]. Up to now, there is no study investigating the role of LIF in SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) model, it has been shown that overexpression of LIF enhanced the recovery of lungs during pneumonia. Neutralization of the LIF induced alveolar damage and chemokine secretion [69]. According to these data, LIF might also have protective effects in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
LIF nanoparticles (LIF-NPs) indicated clinical benefits in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) animal models. LIF-NPs possessed immunomodulatory effects and increased self-tolerance in animal models for ARDS [70]. These inhalable NPs could be a novel strategy for lung tissue repair and cytokine storm inhibition [64]. Activation and polarization of macrophages play a major role in the initiation and intensity of inflammation, respectively, in ALI/ARDS. Peptide-coated gold nanoparticles could alleviate lung inflammation through inducing M1-to-M2 macrophage phenotype transition and increasing the anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) in the lung of acute lung injury (ALI) mice [71].
Decoy biomolecules
As mentioned above, SARS-COV-2 attaches to ACE2 receptor to invade the host cells, particularly alveolar epithelial cells. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has strong affinity to ACE2 receptor [72–74]. This attachment may enhance viral entry and replication [74, 75]. It is assumed that targeting this interaction and using soluble form of ACE2 could be a potential therapeutic approach [76]. Studies on COVID-19 indicated that ACE2 injection could competitively neutralize the virus and improve lung injury [77]. Recently, a novel therapeutic approach was developed based on soluble ACE2 interaction with the virus. It has been shown that human recombinant soluble ACE2 (hrsACE2) could inhibit SARS-CoV-2 from entering the host cells, decreasing the viral load in a dose-dependent manner. This molecule inhibits viral infection of human blood vessels and kidney organoids. These data indicated that hrsACE2 was effective in early-stage patients [78]. Since the inhibitory effects of hrsACE2 were not complete, it is preliminarily considered that the virus may use a second receptor or co-factor such as transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) [79]. In this regard, TMPRSS2 inhibitor was approved for clinical application in COVID-19 to inhibit the entry of virus [74].
Antiviral drugs
Remdesivir is claimed to be an option to treat COVID-19 [80]. It is a nucleoside analog and has broad-spectrum activities against RNA viruses such as MERS; remdesivir can effectively diminish the viral load in lung tissue infected with MERS-CoV and improve lung function in animal model [81]. The in vitro study revealed that, compared with ribavirin or favipiravir, remdesivir in combination with emetine showed the inhibition in viral yield that might achieve 64.9% [82]. Regarding its clinical application, Grein et al. reported the good improvement among severe COVID-19 cases (68%, n = 53) after treatment with remdesivir [83]. It also showed promising results in the treatment of a patient with COVID-19 in the USA [84]. However, its efficacy is doubted because, e.g., in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, Wang et al. reported no statistically significant clinical benefits [85].
Chloroquine is a drug used to treat malaria [86]. It is taught that chloroquine has a great potential to treat COVID-19 [87]; chloroquine can prevent pH-dependent steps of the replication of several viruses such as SARS-CoV [88]. Additionally, chloroquine has immunomodulatory effects by suppressing the production/release of TNF-α and IL-6. It also might interfere with viral infection and replication, as an autophagy inhibitor [89]. In preprinted paper, Chen et al. showed that hydroxychloroquine use can shorten the time to clinical recovery in COVID-19 patients [90]. Gautret et al. claimed that the treatment of COVID-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine (chloroquine analog) caused the significant viral load reduction/disappearance [91]. However, other researchers did not reveal the same effect. Moreover, high-dose chloroquine diphosphate in combination with azithromycin or oseltamivir resulted in high rates of death and adverse cardiac events [92]. Clinicians also cautioned that the increased consumption of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine can lead to their shortage that might create a problem for people suffering systemic lupus erythematosus, other rheumatological disorders, primary Sjögren syndrome, dermatological diseases, and antiphospholipid syndrome [93].
It has been previously reported that the protease inhibitors such as lopinavir and ritonavir, used to treat infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [94], could improve the outcome of MERS-CoV- [95] and SARS-CoV [96]–infected patients. Initially, lopinavir and ritonavir were hypothesized to inhibit the 3-chymotrypsin-like protease of SARS and MERS, and seemed to be associated with improved outcomes of patients with SARS in a non-randomized open-label trial. In a case report from Korea, it has been shown that the viral loads of a SARS-CoV-2 significantly decreased after lopinavir/ritonavir treatment [97]. However, it is controversial whether HIV protease inhibitors could effectively inhibit the 3-chymotrypsin-like and papain-like proteases of SARS-CoV-2. HIV protease belongs to the aspartic protease family, whereas the two coronavirus proteases are from the cysteine protease family. Moreover, HIV protease inhibitors were specifically optimized to fit the C2 symmetry in the catalytic site of the HIV protease dimer; however, this C2-symmetric pocket is absent in coronavirus proteases. If HIV protease inhibitors alter host pathways to indirectly interfere with coronavirus infections, their potency remains a concern [98].
Favipiravir is a new type of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor. Additionally, it is capable of blocking the replication of other RNA viruses [99]. Favipiravir is converted into an active phosphoribosylated form (favipiravir-RTP) in cells and is recognized as a substrate by viral RNA polymerase, therefore inhibiting RNA polymerase activity [100]. Favipiravir may have potential antiviral action on SARS-CoV-2, which is a RNA virus. In a clinical trial on favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19, the preliminary results indicated that favipiravir had more potent antiviral action than lopinavir/ritonavir [101].
BCG vaccine
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG; weakened strain of Mycobacterium bovis) vaccination could have protective effects against COVID-19 infection. There are several mechanisms that ensure BCG-induced non-specific protection and are actively studied. BCG and viral antigens have similar molecular structure; so after vaccination, B and T cells can recognize both pathogen types. Moreover, BCG vaccination results in the so-called trained immunity—epigenetic reprogramming of innate immune cell types [102]. Monocytes of vaccinated individuals had higher expression of different surface markers of activation and synthesis of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IFNγ, and TNF) in response to infection than those of non-vaccinated ones; so non-mycobacterium pathogens, e.g., staphylococci, yellow fever virus, and influenza, can be removed faster [103]. In several preprints, it is claimed that BCG vaccination program could reduce the number of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals and their mortality [104, 105]. However, the WHO does not recommend BCG vaccination to prevent COVID-19 because there is still no direct evidence that it can protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection, and all related clinical trials are ongoing [106].
Corticosteroids
Corticosteroids are well-known with their immunosuppressive activity, which are essential to stop or delay the progression of the pneumonia and have been proved to be beneficial for the treatment of ARDS [107]. Additionally, corticosteroids have an anti-inflammatory effect to diminish systemic inflammation, reduce exudative fluid in the lung tissue, and inhibit further diffused alveolar damage, which can relieve hypoxemia which can protect the lungs effectively and prevent further progression of respiratory insufficiency [108]. The use of corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19 is controversial due to their negative impact on anti-viral immune responses [109]. However, it has been shown that corticosteroids could improve mortality in severe COVID-19 patients with systemic hyperinflammation [110]. It is supposed that patient selection, half-life, formulation, and dosage of the corticosteroids are important factors determining the clinical outcome. In this regard, a preprinted study indicated that in severe COVID-19 patients with ARDS early short-term and low dose of corticosteroid (methylprednisolone) improved clinical manifestation and long lesions [111].
Conclusion
Although it seems that antiviral drugs are effective in improving clinical manifestation and controlling the SARS-CoV-2 infection, until now, there is no definite treatment protocol for this novel virus infection. Lymphocytopenia alongside with excessive inflammation and cytokine storm followed by ARDS in these patients are still unsolved problems that cause severity of the disease [14]. Therefore, it is considered that immune response modulation and inflammation management are essential steps. Based on the abovementioned, more studies needed to be conducted on immunopathogenesis and immune response during the SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this regard, new therapeutic approaches including mesenchymal stromal cell therapy and immune cell therapy showed promising results.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Peter Timashev, Email: timashev.peter@gmail.com.
Massoud Vosough, Email: masvos@royaninstitute.org.
References
- 1.Zhang L, Liu Y (2020) Potential interventions for novel coronavirus in China: a systematic review. J Med Virol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 2.Wang S, et al. Coronaviruses and the associated potential therapeutics for the viral infections. J Infect Dis Ther. 2020;8(417):2. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shanmugaraj B, Malla A, Phoolcharoen W. Emergence of novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV: need for rapid vaccine and biologics development. Pathogens. 2020;9(2):148. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9020148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li G, Fan Y, Lai Y, Han T, Li Z, Zhou P, Pan P, Wang W, Hu D, Liu X, Zhang Q, Wu J. Coronavirus infections and immune responses. J Med Virol. 2020;92(4):424–432. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cai Q, Yang M, Liu D, Chen J, Shu D, Xia J, Liao X, Gu Y, Cai Q, Yang Y, Shen C, Li X, Peng L, Huang D, Zhang J, Zhang S, Wang F, Liu J, Chen L, Chen S, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Cao R, Zhong W, Liu Y, Liu L (2020) Experimental treatment with favipiravir for COVID-19: an open-label control study. Engineering [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Thiel V, Weber F. Interferon and cytokine responses to SARS-coronavirus infection. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008;19(2):121–132. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang D et al (2020) Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Jama [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Heymann DL, Shindo N. COVID-19: what is next for public health? Lancet. 2020;395(10224):542–545. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30374-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yu F et al (2020) Measures for diagnosing and treating infections by a novel coronavirus responsible for a pneumonia outbreak originating in Wuhan, China. Microbes Infect [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Yan R et al (2020) Structural basis for the recognition of the SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Zhu R-F et al Systematic review of the registered clinical trials of coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19). medRxiv:2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Frieman M, Heise M, Baric R. SARS coronavirus and innate immunity. Virus Res. 2008;133(1):101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu L, Wei Q, Nishiura K, Peng J, Wang H, Midkiff C, Alvarez X, Qin C, Lackner A, Chen Z. Spatiotemporal interplay of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and respiratory mucosal cells drives viral dissemination in rhesus macaques. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9(4):1089–1101. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang W, Zhao Y, Zhang F, Wang Q, Li T, Liu Z, Wang J, Qin Y, Zhang X, Yan X, Zeng X, Zhang S. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): the experience of clinical immunologists from China. Clin Immunol. 2020;214:108393. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Janice Oh H-L, Ken-En Gan S, Bertoletti A, Tan YJ. Understanding the T cell immune response in SARS coronavirus infection. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2012;1(1):1–6. doi: 10.1038/emi.2012.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ng O-W, Chia A, Tan AT, Jadi RS, Leong HN, Bertoletti A, Tan YJ. Memory T cell responses targeting the SARS coronavirus persist up to 11 years post-infection. Vaccine. 2016;34(17):2008–2014. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.02.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu WJ, Lan J, Liu K, Deng Y, Yao Y, Wu S, Chen H, Bao L, Zhang H, Zhao M, Wang Q, Han L, Chai Y, Qi J, Zhao J, Meng S, Qin C, Gao GF, Tan W. Protective T cell responses featured by concordant recognition of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus–derived CD8+ T cell epitopes and host MHC. J Immunol. 2017;198(2):873–882. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu WJ, Zhao M, Liu K, Xu K, Wong G, Tan W, Gao GF. T-cell immunity of SARS-CoV: implications for vaccine development against MERS-CoV. Antivir Res. 2017;137:82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Diao B et al (2020) Reduction and functional exhaustion of T cells in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). medRxiv [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.McLane LM, Abdel-Hakeem MS, Wherry EJ. CD8 T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection and cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 2019;37:457–495. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-041015-055318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zheng M et al (2020) Functional exhaustion of antiviral lymphocytes in COVID-19 patients. Cell Mol Immunol:1–3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Zhou Y et al (2020) Aberrant pathogenic GM-CSF+ T cells and inflammatory CD14+ CD16+ monocytes in severe pulmonary syndrome patients of a new coronavirus. bioRxiv
- 24.Vetter P, Eckerle I, Kaiser L (2020) Covid-19: a puzzle with many missing pieces. British Medical Journal Publishing Group [DOI] [PubMed]
- 25.Casadevall A, Pirofski L-a (2020) The convalescent sera option for containing COVID-19. J Clin Invest 130(4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Wu X-X, Gao HN, Wu HB, Peng XM, Ou HL, Li LJ. Successful treatment of avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) infection using convalescent plasma. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;41:3–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Beigel JH, Voell J, Kumar P, Raviprakash K, Wu H, Jiao JA, Sullivan E, Luke T, Davey RT., Jr Safety and tolerability of a novel, polyclonal human anti-MERS coronavirus antibody produced from transchromosomic cattle: a phase 1 randomised, double-blind, single-dose-escalation study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(4):410–418. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30002-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Arabi Y, et al. Feasibility, safety, clinical, and laboratory effects of convalescent plasma therapy for patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection: a study protocol. Springerplus. 2015;4(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1490-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van Doremalen N, Falzarano D, Ying T, de Wit E, Bushmaker T, Feldmann F, Okumura A, Wang Y, Scott DP, Hanley PW, Feldmann H, Dimitrov DS, Munster VJ. Efficacy of antibody-based therapies against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in common marmosets. Antivir Res. 2017;143:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhou G, Zhao Q. Perspectives on therapeutic neutralizing antibodies against the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(10):1718–1723. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.45123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Duan K, Liu B, Li C, Zhang H, Yu T, Qu J, Zhou M, Chen L, Meng S, Hu Y, Peng C, Yuan M, Huang J, Wang Z, Yu J, Gao X, Wang D, Yu X, Li L, Zhang J, Wu X, Li B, Xu Y, Chen W, Peng Y, Hu Y, Lin L, Liu X, Huang S, Zhou Z, Zhang L, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Deng K, Xia Z, Gong Q, Zhang W, Zheng X, Liu Y, Yang H, Zhou D, Yu D, Hou J, Shi Z, Chen S, Chen Z, Zhang X, Yang X. Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117(17):9490–9496. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004168117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tiberghien P, Lamballerie X, Morel P, Gallian P, Lacombe K, Yazdanpanah Y (2020) Collecting and evaluating convalescent plasma for COVID-19 treatment: why and how. Vox Sang [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Wang S-F, Tseng SP, Yen CH, Yang JY, Tsao CH, Shen CW, Chen KH, Liu FT, Liu WT, Chen YMA, Huang JC. Antibody-dependent SARS coronavirus infection is mediated by antibodies against spike proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;451(2):208–214. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zand M and J Wang Potential mechanisms of age related severity of COVID-19 infection: implications for vaccine development and convalescent serum therapy. 2020.
- 35.Bakker AB, et al. Novel human monoclonal antibody combination effectively neutralizing natural rabies virus variants and individual in vitro escape mutants. J Virol. 2005;79(14):9062–9068. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.14.9062-9068.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sneller MC, et al. An open-label phase 1 clinical trial of the anti-α4β7 monoclonal antibody vedolizumab in HIV-infected individuals. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(509):eaax3447. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax3447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jin Y, Lei C, Hu D, Dimitrov DS, Ying T. Human monoclonal antibodies as candidate therapeutics against emerging viruses. Front Med. 2017;11(4):462–470. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0596-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Corti D, Passini N, Lanzavecchia A, Zambon M. Rapid generation of a human monoclonal antibody to combat Middle East respiratory syndrome. J Infect Public Health. 2016;9(3):231–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhu Z, Chakraborti S, He Y, Roberts A, Sheahan T, Xiao X, Hensley LE, Prabakaran P, Rockx B, Sidorov IA, Corti D, Vogel L, Feng Y, Kim JO, Wang LF, Baric R, Lanzavecchia A, Curtis KM, Nabel GJ, Subbarao K, Jiang S, Dimitrov DS. Potent cross-reactive neutralization of SARS coronavirus isolates by human monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104(29):12123–12128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701000104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sui J, Li W, Murakami A, Tamin A, Matthews LJ, Wong SK, Moore MJ, Tallarico ASC, Olurinde M, Choe H, Anderson LJ, Bellini WJ, Farzan M, Marasco WA. Potent neutralization of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus by a human mAb to S1 protein that blocks receptor association. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101(8):2536–2541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307140101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Traggiai E, Becker S, Subbarao K, Kolesnikova L, Uematsu Y, Gismondo MR, Murphy BR, Rappuoli R, Lanzavecchia A. An efficient method to make human monoclonal antibodies from memory B cells: potent neutralization of SARS coronavirus. Nat Med. 2004;10(8):871–875. doi: 10.1038/nm1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Corti D, Zhao J, Pedotti M, Simonelli L, Agnihothram S, Fett C, Fernandez-Rodriguez B, Foglierini M, Agatic G, Vanzetta F, Gopal R, Langrish CJ, Barrett NA, Sallusto F, Baric RS, Varani L, Zambon M, Perlman S, Lanzavecchia A. Prophylactic and postexposure efficacy of a potent human monoclonal antibody against MERS coronavirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(33):10473–10478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510199112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Luke T, et al. Human polyclonal immunoglobulin G from transchromosomic bovines inhibits MERS-CoV in vivo. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(326):326ra21-326ra21. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Johnson RF, Bagci U, Keith L, Tang X, Mollura DJ, Zeitlin L, Qin J, Huzella L, Bartos CJ, Bohorova N, Bohorov O, Goodman C, Kim DH, Paulty MH, Velasco J, Whaley KJ, Johnson JC, Pettitt J, Ork BL, Solomon J, Oberlander N, Zhu Q, Sun J, Holbrook MR, Olinger GG, Baric RS, Hensley LE, Jahrling PB, Marasco WA. 3B11-N, a monoclonal antibody against MERS-CoV, reduces lung pathology in rhesus monkeys following intratracheal inoculation of MERS-CoV Jordan-n3/2012. Virology. 2016;490:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2016.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen W-H, PJ Hotez, and ME Bottazzi Potential for developing the SARS-CoV receptor binding domain recombinant protein (RBD) as a heterologous human vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Zheng Z et al (2020) Monoclonal antibodies for the S2 subunit of spike of SARS-CoV cross-react with the newly-emerged SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Zumla A, Hui DS, Azhar EI, Memish ZA, Maeurer M. Reducing mortality from 2019-nCoV: host-directed therapies should be an option. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):e35–e36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30305-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Xu X et al (2020) Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab, in China. Xiv:20200300026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Chiappelli F, Khakshooy A, Greenberg G. CoViD-19 Immunopathology & Immunotherapy. Bioinformation. 2020;16(3):219–222. doi: 10.6026/97320630016219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Richardson P, Griffin I, Tucker C, Smith D, Oechsle O, Phelan A, Stebbing J. Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):e30–e31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30304-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Stebbing J, Phelan A, Griffin I, Tucker C, Oechsle O, Smith D, Richardson P. COVID-19: combining antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:400–402. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30132-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang F, Nie J, Wang H, Zhao Q, Xiong Y, Deng L, Song S, Ma Z, Mo P, Zhang Y. Characteristics of peripheral lymphocyte subset alteration in COVID-19 pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 2020;221:1762–1769. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liu Z, Long W, Tu M, Chen S, Huang Y, Wang S, Zhou W, Chen D, Zhou L, Wang M, Wu M, Huang Q, Xu H, Zeng W, Guo L (2020) Lymphocyte subset (CD4+, CD8+) counts reflect the severity of infection and predict the clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. J Infect [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Madera S, Rapp M, Firth MA, Beilke JN, Lanier LL, Sun JC. Type I IFN promotes NK cell expansion during viral infection by protecting NK cells against fratricide. J Exp Med. 2016;213(2):225–233. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shi Y et al (2020) Immunopathological characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 cases in Guangzhou, China. medRxiv [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Wan S et al (2020) Characteristics of lymphocyte subsets and cytokines in peripheral blood of 123 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP). Medrxiv
- 57.Weiskopf D et al (2020) Phenotype of SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cells in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. medRxiv [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 58.Liang B et al Clinical remission of a critically ill COVID-19 patient treated by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 59.Hashemi SM et al (2019) Investigating the route of administration and efficacy of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells and conditioned medium in type 1 diabetic mice. Inflammopharmacology:1–17 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 60.Hossein-Khannazer N, et al. Study of the immunomodulatory effects of osteogenic differentiated human dental pulp stem cells. Life Sci. 2019;216:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Li Y, Xu J, Shi W, Chen C, Shao Y, Zhu L, Lu W, Han XD. Mesenchymal stromal cell treatment prevents H9N2 avian influenza virus-induced acute lung injury in mice. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0395-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Khatri M, Richardson LA, Meulia T. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles attenuate influenza virus-induced acute lung injury in a pig model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0774-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bari E, Ferrarotti I, Saracino L, Perteghella S, Torre ML, Corsico AG. Mesenchymal stromal cell secretome for severe COVID-19 infections: premises for the therapeutic use. Cells. 2020;9(4):924. doi: 10.3390/cells9040924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Metcalfe SM. Mesenchymal stem cells and management of COVID-19 pneumonia. Med Drug Discov. 2020;5:100019. doi: 10.1016/j.medidd.2020.100019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Leng Z, Zhu R, Hou W, Feng Y, Yang Y, Han Q, Shan G, Meng F, du D, Wang S, Fan J, Wang W, Deng L, Shi H, Li H, Hu Z, Zhang F, Gao J, Liu H, Li X, Zhao Y, Yin K, He X, Gao Z, Wang Y, Yang B, Jin R, Stambler I, Lim LW, Su H, Moskalev A, Cano A, Chakrabarti S, Min KJ, Ellison-Hughes G, Caruso C, Jin K, Zhao RC. Transplantation of ACE2-mesenchymal stem cells improves the outcome of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Aging Dis. 2020;11(2):216–228. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shetty AK. Mesenchymal stem cell infusion shows promise for combating coronavirus (COVID-19)-induced pneumonia. Aging Dis. 2020;11(2):462–464. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Foronjy RF, Dabo AJ, Cummins N, Geraghty P. Leukemia inhibitory factor protects the lung during respiratory syncytial viral infection. BMC Immunol. 2014;15(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12865-014-0041-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Traber KE, et al. Myeloid-epithelial cross talk coordinates synthesis of the tissue-protective cytokine leukemia inhibitory factor during pneumonia. Am J Phys Lung Cell Mol Phys. 2017;313(3):L548–L558. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00482.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Poon J, Campos M, Foronjy RF, Nath S, Gupta G, Railwah C, Dabo AJ, Baumlin N, Salathe M, Geraghty P. Cigarette smoke exposure reduces leukemia inhibitory factor levels during respiratory syncytial viral infection. Int J Chronic Obstruct Pulmonary Dis. 2019;14:1305–1315. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S196658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Metcalfe SM, et al. Multiple sclerosis and the LIF/IL-6 axis: use of nanotechnology to harness the tolerogenic and reparative properties of LIF. Nanobiomedicine. 2015;2(Godište 2015):2–5. doi: 10.5772/60622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wang L, et al. Manipulation of macrophage polarization by peptide-coated gold nanoparticles and its protective effects on acute lung injury. J Nanobiotechnol. 2020;18(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12951-019-0560-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tolouian R et al (2020) COVID-19 interactions with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and the kinin system; looking at a potential treatment. J Renal Injury Prevent 9(2)
- 73.Cheng H, Wang Y, Wang GQ (2020) Organ-protective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and its effect on the prognosis of COVID-19. J Med Virol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 74.Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, Schiergens TS, Herrler G, Wu NH, Nitsche A, Müller MA, Drosten C, Pöhlmann S. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ju B et al (2020) Potent human neutralizing antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection. bioRxiv [DOI] [PubMed]
- 76.Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, Huan Y, Guo F, Guan B, Yang P, Sarao R, Wada T, Leong-Poi H, Crackower MA, Fukamizu A, Hui CC, Hein L, Uhlig S, Slutsky AS, Jiang C, Penninger JM. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005;436(7047):112–116. doi: 10.1038/nature03712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zhang H et al (2020) Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med:1–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 78.Monteil V (2020) Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infections in engineered human tissues using clinical-grade soluble human ACE2. cellpress [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 79.Lukassen S et al (2020) SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are predominantly expressed in a transient secretory cell type in subsegmental bronchial branches. bioRxiv [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 80.Al-Tawfiq JA, Al-Homoud AH, Memish ZA. Remdesivir as a possible therapeutic option for the COVID-19. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;34:101615. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sheahan TP, et al. Comparative therapeutic efficacy of remdesivir and combination lopinavir, ritonavir, and interferon beta against MERS-CoV. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):019–13940. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13940-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Choy K-T, Wong AYL, Kaewpreedee P, Sia SF, Chen D, Hui KPY, Chu DKW, Chan MCW, Cheung PPH, Huang X, Peiris M, Yen HL. Remdesivir, lopinavir, emetine, and homoharringtonine inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro. Antivir Res. 2020;178:104786. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Grein J, Ohmagari N, Shin D, Diaz G, Asperges E, Castagna A, Feldt T, Green G, Green ML, Lescure FX, Nicastri E, Oda R, Yo K, Quiros-Roldan E, Studemeister A, Redinski J, Ahmed S, Bernett J, Chelliah D, Chen D, Chihara S, Cohen SH, Cunningham J, D’Arminio Monforte A, Ismail S, Kato H, Lapadula G, L’Her E, Maeno T, Majumder S, Massari M, Mora-Rillo M, Mutoh Y, Nguyen D, Verweij E, Zoufaly A, Osinusi AO, DeZure A, Zhao Y, Zhong L, Chokkalingam A, Elboudwarej E, Telep L, Timbs L, Henne I, Sellers S, Cao H, Tan SK, Winterbourne L, Desai P, Mera R, Gaggar A, Myers RP, Brainard DM, Childs R, Flanigan T (2020) Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. N Engl J Med [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 84.Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, Lofy KH, Wiesman J, Bruce H, Spitters C, Ericson K, Wilkerson S, Tural A, Diaz G, Cohn A, Fox L, Patel A, Gerber SI, Kim L, Tong S, Lu X, Lindstrom S, Pallansch MA, Weldon WC, Biggs HM, Uyeki TM, Pillai SK, Washington State 2019-nCoV Case Investigation Team First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(10):929–936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wang Y, Zhang D, du G, du R, Zhao J, Jin Y, Fu S, Gao L, Cheng Z, Lu Q, Hu Y, Luo G, Wang K, Lu Y, Li H, Wang S, Ruan S, Yang C, Mei C, Wang Y, Ding D, Wu F, Tang X, Ye X, Ye Y, Liu B, Yang J, Yin W, Wang A, Fan G, Zhou F, Liu Z, Gu X, Xu J, Shang L, Zhang Y, Cao L, Guo T, Wan Y, Qin H, Jiang Y, Jaki T, Hayden FG, Horby PW, Cao B, Wang C. Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2020;395:1569–1578. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Aguiar AC, et al. Chloroquine analogs as antimalarial candidates with potent in vitro and in vivo activity. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2018;8(3):459–464. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2018.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Cortegiani A, Ingoglia G, Ippolito M, Giarratano A, Einav S. A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19. J Crit Care. 2020;57:279–283. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Vincent MJ, et al. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virol J. 2005;2(69):2–69. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Golden EB, Cho HY, Hofman FM, Louie SG, Schönthal AH, Chen TC. Quinoline-based antimalarial drugs: a novel class of autophagy inhibitors. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38(3):E12. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.FOCUS14748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Chen Z et al (2020) Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: results of a randomized clinical trial. MedRxiv
- 91.Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, Doudier B, Courjon J, Giordanengo V, Vieira VE, Dupont HT, Honoré S, Colson P, Chabrière E, la Scola B, Rolain JM, Brouqui P, Raoult D (2020) Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents:105949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 92.Borba MGS, Val FFA, Sampaio VS, Alexandre MAA, Melo GC, Brito M, Mourão MPG, Brito-Sousa JD, Baía-da-Silva D, Guerra MVF, Hajjar LA, Pinto RC, Balieiro AAS, Pacheco AGF, Santos JDO, Jr, Naveca FG, Xavier MS, Siqueira AM, Schwarzbold A, Croda J, Nogueira ML, Romero GAS, Bassat Q, Fontes CJ, Albuquerque BC, Daniel-Ribeiro CT, Monteiro WM, Lacerda MVG, for the CloroCovid-19 Team Effect of high vs low doses of chloroquine diphosphate as adjunctive therapy for patients hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e208857–e208857. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Jakhar D, Kaur I (2020) Potential of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 causes fears of shortages among people with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Med:1–1 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 94.Cvetkovic RS, Goa KL. Lopinavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection. Drugs. 2003;63(8):769–802. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363080-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Arabi YM, et al. Treatment of Middle East respiratory syndrome with a combination of lopinavir-ritonavir and interferon-β1b (MIRACLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2427-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Chu C, Cheng VC, Hung IF, Wong MM, Chan KH, Chan KS, Kao RY, Poon LL, Wong CL, Guan Y, Peiris JS, Yuen KY, HKU/UCH SARS Study Group Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of SARS: initial virological and clinical findings. Thorax. 2004;59(3):252–256. doi: 10.1136/thorax.2003.012658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lim J et al (2020) Case of the index patient who caused tertiary transmission of COVID-19 infection in Korea: the application of lopinavir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19 infected pneumonia monitored by quantitative RT-PCR. J Korean Med Sci 35(6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 98.Wu C et al (2020) Analysis of therapeutic targets for SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of potential drugs by computational methods. Acta Pharm Sin B [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 99.Delang L, Abdelnabi R, Neyts J. Favipiravir as a potential countermeasure against neglected and emerging RNA viruses. Antivir Res. 2018;153:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Furuta Y, Komeno T, Nakamura T. Favipiravir (T-705), a broad spectrum inhibitor of viral RNA polymerase. Proc Jpn Acad Series B. 2017;93(7):449–463. doi: 10.2183/pjab.93.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Dong L, Hu S, Gao J. Discovering drugs to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Drug Discov Ther. 2020;14(1):58–60. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2020.01012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Goodridge HS, Ahmed SS, Curtis N, Kollmann TR, Levy O, Netea MG, Pollard AJ, van Crevel R, Wilson CB. Harnessing the beneficial heterologous effects of vaccination. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(6):392–400. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Arts RJ, et al. BCG vaccination protects against experimental viral infection in humans through the induction of cytokines associated with trained immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(1):89–100. e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Miller A et al (2020) Correlation between universal BCG vaccination policy and reduced morbidity and mortality for COVID-19: an epidemiological study. medRxiv
- 105.Dayal D, Gupta S (2020) Connecting BCG vaccination and COVID-19: additional data. medRxiv
- 106.Organization WH Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination and COVID-19: scientific brief, 12 April 2020. 2020, World Health Organization
- 107.Thompson BT. Glucocorticoids and acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(4):S253–S257. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000057900.19201.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Rhen T, Cidlowski JA. Antiinflammatory action of glucocorticoids—new mechanisms for old drugs. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(16):1711–1723. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Yang X et al (2020) Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 110.Siddiqi HK, Mehra MR. COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: a clinical-therapeutic staging proposal. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020;39:405–407. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wang Y et al (2020) Early, low-dose and short-term application of corticosteroid treatment in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: single-center experience from Wuhan, China. medRxiv