Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the deadliest diseases, claiming ~2 million deaths annually worldwide. The majority of people in TB endemic regions are vaccinated with Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG), which is the only usable vaccine available. BCG is efficacious against meningeal and disseminated TB in children, but protective responses are relatively short-lived and fail to protect against adult pulmonary TB. The longevity of vaccine efficacy critically depends on the magnitude of long-lasting central memory T (TCM) cells, a major source of which is stem cell-like memory T (TSM) cells. These TSM cells exhibit enhanced self-renewal capacity as well as to rapidly respond to antigen and generate protective poly-functional T cells producing IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2 and IL-17. It is now evident that T helper Th 1 and Th17 cells are essential for host protection against TB. Recent reports have indicated that Th17 cells preserve the molecular signature for TSM cells, which eventually differentiate into IFN-γ-producing effector cells. BCG is ineffective in inducing Th17 cell responses, which might explain its inadequate vaccine efficacy. Here, we show that revaccination with BCG along with clofazimine treatment promotes TSM differentiation, which continuously restores TCM and T effector memory (TEM) cells and drastically increases vaccine efficacy in BCG-primed animals. Analyses of these TSM cells revealed that they are predominantly precursors to host protective Th1 and Th17 cells. Taken together, these findings revealed that clofazimine treatment at the time of BCG revaccination provides superior host protection against TB by increasing long-lasting TSM cells.
Author summary
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the deadliest diseases, claiming ~2 million deaths annually worldwide. Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) is the only usable vaccine available and exhibits efficacy against meningeal and disseminated TB in children. Consequently, the vast majority of people in TB endemic regions are vaccinated with BCG. However, host protective immune responses diminish over time due to gradual depletion of T central memory (TCM) cells, which are responsible for long-term host protection. Here, we provide evidence that revaccination with BCG along with the clofazimine, an approved drug for treatment of leprosy and drug-resistant TB, induces stem cell-like memory T (TSM) cells. TSM cells are precursors to TCM cells, and provide long-term host protection to TB by continuous supply of TCM cells. Interestingly, these TSM cells were generated from IL-17-producing T helper (Th)17 cells. These TSM cells differentiated into TCM and T effector memory (TEM) cells and maintained a stable pool of critically important Th1 and Th17 cells to provide optimal host protection against TB.
Introduction
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb), the etiological agent of tuberculosis (TB), causes nearly 2 million deaths annually worldwide. One third of the global population is infected with a latent form of TB, which represents an enormous reservoir for subsequent reactivation [1]. Conditions such as HIV infection that impair immunity may lead to TB reactivation [2]. In the absence of HIV co-infection, approximately 10% of latently infected individuals develop TB in their life time [2]. However, HIV co-infection increases this probability to more than 30% [3], either by directly eliminating CD4+ T helper (Th) cells or by modulating other host immune responses [4,5]. Although one third of the global population is latently infected with M.tb, the vast majority of individuals do not succumb to active TB, suggesting that immunity plays a role in host resistance. Th cells play a key role in host protective immunity against TB [6]. Previous reports, including studies from our group, have demonstrated that Th1 cells play an important role in host resistance against TB infection [7–10]. However, although the vast majority of TB patients mount Th1 responses, disease continues to progress in many patients [11]. These observations indicate that Th1 cell responses are essential but not sufficient for host protection. Recent reports have indicated that in addition to Th1 cells, Th17 cells play important roles in host protection, especially in secondary infection and vaccination [12,13]. However, Th2 and regulatory T (Treg) cells promote disease progression by counter-regulating these host-protective immune responses [8]. BCG induces sufficient Th1 responses but is ineffective in inducing optimal Th17 responses, which are essential for the generation of long-term memory responses [12,13]. Additionally, BCG induces antigen-specific Tregs and IL-4-producing Th2 cells, which may inhibit antigen-specific memory cells [14]. Previously, we and others reported that inhibition of Treg and Th2 responses along with BCG immunization enhances Th1 and Th17 cells, which promotes memory T cell responses that eventually translated into enhanced host protection [14].
Although BCG has limited efficacy against adult pulmonary TB, it is efficacious against disseminated and meningeal TB in young children [8]. Nevertheless, despite widespread vaccination with BCG, adult populations are not protected against pulmonary TB. It is well established that long-term memory responses are critically dependent on T central memory (TCM) cells rather than T effector memory (TEM) cells. Vaccine efficacy of M.tb depends upon the TCM:TEM ratio [15,16]. TEM cells are highly active and are responsible for antigen clearance, whereas TCM cells are critical for long-term immunity and are capable of self-regeneration. An increase in the TCM pool indicates reduced bacterial burden and enhanced long-term antigen-specific memory T cell responses [16]. It is highly likely that the limited protection of BCG against adult pulmonary TB is due to its inability to generate an adequate pool of M.tb antigen-specific TCM cells. Although BCG induces some TCM cells, these cells may decline over time, due to continuous exposure to environmental mycobacteria found in TB endemic regions [17–19]. Recently, a new memory T cell subset, T stem cell memory (TSM) cells, was characterized. These cells are endowed with stem cell-like properties, are capable of self-renewal, and exhibit the capacity to differentiate into a broad spectrum of memory subsets [20–23]. TSM cells have been well documented among viral, parasitic and tumour-specific T cells [20–23]. Stemness of TSM cells might be harnessed therapeutically to enhance the efficacy of vaccines for a variety of diseases. However, in TB, limited knowledge about TSM cells is available.
Polyfunctional CD4+ T cells that produce IFN-γ, TNF-α , and IL-2 are critically important for protective immunity against TB [24,25]. One of the main challenges with the BCG vaccine is that chronic infection causes exhaustion of host-protective polyfunctional T cells, due to induction of various inhibitory receptors such as PD-1 and TIM-3 [26]. T cell exhaustion develops as a step wise loss of proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity during chronic infection. Neutralizing these inhibitory molecules can restore activity and polyfunctionality of exhausted T cells to provide improved host protection [26].
The pathogenesis of TB contains two components: tissue destruction due to the infectious agent itself and tissue destruction due to the inflammatory process mediated by host immune responses. Thus, in some settings anti-inflammatory or immune modulatory agents can augment host protection when combined with conventional antibiotics [27]. Recently, we reported that the immune modulator clofazimine can enhance the vaccine efficacy of BCG by expanding antigen-specific TCM cells in TB [28,29]. Clofazimine has been mainly employed for treatment of leprosy, and the WHO recently recommended its use as an antibiotic for drug-resistant TB [30]. Clofazimine is a lipophilic compound that binds with bacterial DNA and can enter host cells to interfere with the redox potential and to generate antimicrobial reactive oxygen species [31]. Clofazimine is also a pharmacological inhibitor of the potassium channel Kv1.3, which is predominantly expressed in TEM cells, and Kv1.3 blockade by clofazimine increases TCM populations [28]. Consistent with this observation, Kv1.3-deficient animals have an expanded TCM population and these animals are resistant to TEM-dependent autoimmune encephalitis [32].
In keeping with these findings, and considering widespread BCG vaccination, we sought to examine if a booster dose of BCG supplemented with clofazimine can enhance BCG vaccine efficacy and provide long-term host protection against TB. We found that clofazimine increases the prevalence of TCM and TSM cells while having little effect on TEM cells. Animals also exhibited markedly enhanced vaccine efficacy against a M.tb challenge. Therefore, inclusion of clofazimine during BCG revaccination enhances vaccine efficacy.
Material and methods
Ethics statement
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines approved by the meeting of the Institutional Animals Ethics Committee, held at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi, India (approval no IAEC Code no 19/2014), as well as at the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), New Delhi, India (approval no ICGEB/IAEC/08/2016/TACF-JNU). These animal protocols were approved based on the recommendations from the national animal ethical committee of India and strictly follow the guidelines of the Department of Biotechnology of the Government of India. All mice used for experiments were ethically euthanized by asphyxiation in carbon dioxide, according to institutional and Department of Biotechnology (Government of India) regulations.
Mice
Six- to eight-week-old C57BL/6 female mice and OT-II TCR transgenic mice were procured from the animal house facility of the JNU and ICGEB. All mice used for experiments were housed under barrier conditions in the Tuberculosis Aerosol Challenge Facility (TACF) of ICGEB and treated humanely according to specified animal care protocols of the TACF, ICGEB guidelines.
BCG immunization experiments and drug administration
Mice were immunized subcutaneously with 1×106 colony forming units (CFUs) of BCG (SBRI, Seattle, WA,USA) in 100 μl of sterile PBS. After 60 days of rest, these mice were again immunized with 0.5 × 106 (CFUs) of BCG in 100 μL of sterile PBS. After 1 day of rest these mice were administered clofazimine intra-peritoneally at 5 mg/kg of body weight and Isoniazid (INH) intra-peritoneally at 25mg/kg in 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) once a week for a total of 4 weeks. Mice were subsequently rested for 30 days. These mice were then challenged via the aerosol route with M.tb strain H37Rv, as described below, and organs were harvested after euthanasia to determine bacterial burden and immune phenotypes at different time points. For in vitro studies the concentration of clofazimine and INH were 20 μg/ml respectively and ovalbumin were 50 μg/ml,.
M. tuberculosis low-dose aerosol infection of mice
M.tb strain H37Rv (ATCC 27294; American Type Culture Collection) was a kind gift from the Colorado State University. Mouse infections were performed in accordance with the low-dose aerosol infection model, using a Madison aerosol chamber (University of Wisconsin, Madison) with the nebulizer pre-calibrated at approximately 90–120 CFUs per mouse. M.tb strain H37Rv was grown to mid–log phase (optical density at 600 nm, approximately 0.6) in Middlebrook 7H9 media with 0.1% Tween 80 (Sigma), 0.2% glycerol and 10% Middlebrook Oleic Acid, albumin, dextrose, and catalase enrichment medium (OADC, Difco™, USA). Bacteria were stored at -80°C in 20% glycerol stocks for further experiments. For aerosol infection, cultures were washed twice with PBS and made into a single-cell suspension by passing through a 26-gauge needle for 10 times. Next, 15 ml of the M.tb H37Rv single-cell suspension (100×106 cells) was placed in the nebulizer reservoir of the Madison Aerosol Chamber, calibrated to deliver the desired CFUs of bacteria into the lungs of mice kept in the chamber in 15-minute cycles. At 24 hours after aerosol challenge 3 mice were euthanized for quantitation of pathogen delivery to lungs by measurement of CFUs in lung homogenates. Mice were found to be infected with approximately 110–120 CFUs of M.tb in their lungs. The mice were maintained in a biosafety containment facility.
Quantitation of pathogen burden by CFU counts
Randomly selected mice were euthanized at various time points, after which organs were harvested, homogenized in 0.2-μm–filtered PBS containing 0.05% Tween 80, and plated onto 7H11 Middlebrook plates containing 10% OADC enrichment medium (Difco™, USA). Lung and spleen cell homogenates were plated on 7H11 plates and incubated at 37°C for approximately 21 days. CFUs were counted and the pathogen burdens in lungs and spleens were estimated.
Flow cytometry
Spleens and lungs were isolated from mice and macerated by frosted slides in ice-cold RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Invitrogen) containing 10% foetal bovine serum to prepare a single-cell suspension. Red blood cells were lysed with lysis buffer by incubating at room temperature for 1–2 minutes, and then washed with RPMI-1640 medium. These fresh lymphocytes were counted and cultured overnight in the presence of H37Rv complete soluble antigen (CSA). For surface staining 1×106 cells per well were cultured in 12-well-plates. Before staining cells were washed twice with FACS buffer and then stained with antibodies directed against surface markers. For surface staining lymphocytes were stained with monoclonal antibodies. After adding antibodies, cells were kept for 40 minutes at room temperature. Then cells were washed again with buffer and re-suspended in FACS buffer. For intracellular staining 2×106 cells were cultured per well and stimulated with H37Rv complete soluble antigen overnight, with 1 μg/ml of brefeldin A (Bio-legend) were added during the last 6 hours of culture. For intracellular staining, surface-stained cells were fixed with 100μl of fixation buffer (Bio-legend) for 30 minutes, and then washed twice with permeabilization buffer (Bio-legend), re-suspended in 200 μl of permeabilization buffer, and stained with fluorescently labelled antibodies. After staining cells were washed again with FACS buffer and re-suspended in FACS buffer. The fluorescence intensity of fluorochrome-labelled cells was measured by flow cytometry (FACS-LSR Fortessa; BD Biosciences). BD FACS-DIVA Software was used to acquire the cells, and data analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star). To determine double positive (IFN-γ and TNF-α, IL-2 and IFN-γ, or TNF-α and IL-2 producing cells from the CD4+ TCM or TEM compartment) and triple positive cells (IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 producing cells from the CD4+ TCM and CD4+ TEM compartment) standard Boolean algorithm was used [33].
Antibodies and reagents
We used antibodies against the following markers: CD3 (BD; clone145-2C11), CD4 (Bio legend, clone GK1.5; or FITC, clone RM4-5), CD8 (Bio legend; clone 536.7), CD44 (Bio legend clone, IM7), CD62L (Bio legend clone MEL-14), CD25 (Bio legend clone 3C7), IFN-γ (Bio legend cloneXMG1.2), IL-2 (Bio legend clone JES6-5H4), IL-6 (Bio legend clone MPS-20F3), IL-17 (Bio legend clone tc11-18h10.1), IL-4 (Bio legend clone11b11), TNF-α (Bio legend clone MP6XT22), TGF-β (Bio legend clone TW7-16B4), CD45RA (BD, clone 14.8), CD95 (BD, Clone Jo2), CD122 (BD, clone TM-β), CD127 (BD, Clone SB/199), PD-1 (Bio legend clone, 29F.1A12), Tim-3 (Bio legend, clone B8.2C12), Foxp3 (Bio legend, Clone MF-14). OADC was from DIFCO, and RPMI-1640 and FBS were obtained from Gibco-BRL, ovalbumin from Sigma, and clofazimine from Sigma.
Cytokine assay
Cytokines in the culture supernatant were assayed by a Luminex microbead-based multiplexed assay using commercially available kits according to the manufacturer's instructions (BioPlex, Bio-Rad, Mouse Cytokine Group-1). Samples were run on Bio-Rad Bio-plex 200 system.
q-PCR
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed using Bio-Rad Real-Time thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). The reaction was set up according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Enzyme reverse transcriptase and SYBR green Master mix were procured from Bio-Rad (USA). The relative expression level of mRNAs was normalized to that of internal control GAPDH by using 2-ΔΔCt cycle threshold method. The primer sequences were as follows: tcf7: Forward: TACTATGAACTGGCCCGCAAG, Reverse: CCTGTGGTGGATTCTTGATG; IL-17: Forward: TACCTCAACCGTTCCACG Reverse: TTTCCCTCCGCATTGACACA; t-bet Forward, GCCAGGGAACCGCTTATATG; Reverse GACGATCATCTGGGTCACATTGT,
RORγt: Forward: CTGCTGAGAAGGACAGGGAG, Reverse: AGTTCTGCTGACGGGTGC, and GAPDH: Forward: AAGGGCTCATGACCACAGTC, and Reverse: CAGGGATGATGTTCTGGGC.
Histological studies
Pieces of lungs from mice at 60 days post infection were perfused, removed, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 12 hrs, then transferred to 70% ethanol, paraffin blocks were made, 6 μm sections were cut, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin according to our previous work. Similarly, AFB staining was performed [34].
In vitro experiments with peritoneal macrophages
Six- to eight-week-old C57BL/6 mice were given an i.p. injection of 1 ml thioglycollate medium (4%). After 5 days macrophages were harvested from peritoneal lavage. Macrophages were washed once with cold PBS and suspended in cold RPMI-1640. Cells were counted, seeded on 12-well plates and maintained at 37ºC in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with penicillin–streptomycin (1,000 units/ml) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum. After overnight incubation, non-adherent cells were washed. Adherent cells were treated with CSA (20 μg/ml) followed by clofazimine treatment. Cells were then kept at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. After 48 hrs of treatment macrophages were harvested for flow cytometry.
Co-culture experiments with T cells from OT-II mice
Treated and untreated macrophage (described in the previous section) were co-cultured with CD4+ T cells at 1:3 ratios. CD4+ T cells were purified from splenocytes of OT-II transgenic mice by using nylon wool fiber (Pro assay). For determining ovalbumin-specific immune responses cells were stimulated with ovalbumin at a concentration of 50 μg/ml. After 48 hrs of co-culture these cells were harvested for flow cytometry.
Spectrophotometry analysis
Clofazimine has peak absorption spectra at 450 nm. At different time points (5 days and 31 days) after clofazimine treatment, the residual amounts of clofazimine in the serum of mice were determined using a UV spectrophotometer (VARIAN) [35].
Determination of residual clofazimine in fat bodies
Clofazimine shows maximum bioavailability in the fatty tissue. At different time points (5 days and 25 days) after clofazimine treatment the residual amounts of clofazimine in the fatty tissue of mice were determined by direct visualization and spectroscopy. Control and clofazimine-treated mice were sacrificed and their subcutaneous and mesentric fat bodies were visualized. After taking equal weights of fat tissue (10 mg) from different groups of mice, clofazimine was extracted as described by Baik et al. [36]. These extracted products were suspended into methanol and absorption spectra were determined by UV spectrophotometry (VARIAN).
Statistical analysis
All data were derived from ≥3 independent experiments, and each group included at least 5 mice in each experiment. Statistical analyses were conducted using Graph pad software and values are presented as means with standard deviations. Significant differences between the group means were determined by analysis of variance followed Tukey’s Post hoc test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P≤0.05.
Results
Clofazimine enhances the efficacy of BCG revaccination
BCG immunization is mandatory for newborn children in India and other South Asian countries, which are endemic for M.tb infection. BCG-induced host protective responses diminish over time, which might be due to human and mycobacterial genetics, different coinfections, or continuous exposure to environmental mycobacteria that might cause exhaustion of the long-term memory T cells [37]. Restoring these memory T cell pools may therefore enhance protection against TB. Since people in these endemic countries are already vaccinated with BCG, we considered the possibility of administering a booster dose of BCG (BCG revaccination) in a context that improves host immune responses. Clofazimine is a well-known antibiotic and is currently used for treatment of leprosy [38,39]. Recently, clofazimine was approved for treatment of drug-resistant TB. Interestingly, clofazimine is also an excellent immune modulator that enhances TCM responses while reducing TEM responses [28], and exhibits efficacy against autoimmune diseases such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis [32]. In some settings of long term dosing clofazimine exhibited bioavailability up to 70 days [40], but a single dose or short 8-day treatment regimen displayed bioavailability of 8 to 10 days [41,42]. Despite its long bioavailability and tissue deposition, Swanson et al. established that only free clofazimine in serum has active antimicrobial activity and that clofazimine precipitated in tissues as crystals or bound with proteins in tissues or even serum is devoid of antimicrobial properties [40]. Based on these findings we considered whether clofazimine can enhance the efficacy of a booster dose of BCG in previously immunized mice. Animals were subcutaneously immunized with BCG and rested for 60 days, and these animals were subsequently provided with a booster dose of BCG (0.5x106 CFU) and treated with four doses of clofazimine in weekly intervals. We selected a one week gap between each dose to ensure sufficient bioavailability. These animals were then rested for an additional 30 days followed by aerosol challenge with a low dose of the virulent M.tb strain H37Rv (Fig 1A). Bacterial burdens in lungs and spleens were determined at various time points after challenge. As expected, we observed that clofazimine-treated animals had dramatically reduced CFUs in both lungs and spleens at all time points (Fig 1B). However, dissemination of TB bacteria from lungs to other organs was more restricted in clofazimine-treated and BCG-revaccinated animals, which was expected, as bacterial dissemination is slow, at which time adequate antigen-specific adaptive immune responses that effectively clear the bacteria are already present. Histological analyses of lungs revealed that clofazimine treatment significantly reduced granulomatous regions (Fig 1C and 1D). We found that M.tb infection induced extensive granulomatous regions throughout the lung sections, whereas infection in BCG-vaccinated animals and mice that received a primary and booster BCG vaccination had reduced histopathology. Importantly, animals that received clofazimine at the time of BCG revaccination exhibited more profoundly reduced pathology with few granulomatous regions (Fig 1C). Acid Fast Bacillus (AFB) staining of histological sections confirmed these findings, as mice treated with clofazimine had reduced numbers of bacteria as compared with untreated animals (Fig 1C, lower panels). To ascertain that the observed improvement in vaccine efficacy in clofazimine-treated animals was not due to the residual clofazimine that exhibits direct anti-microbial activity, we analysed clofazimine content in serum and fatty tissues of animals. We could not detect clofazimine in the serum at 31 days after clofazimine treatment (S1 Fig), and only residual amounts were present in fat tissues at 5 days after clofazimine treatment (S2 Fig). Therefore, the observed vaccine efficacy is most likely due to the improved immune responses induced by clofazimine.
Clofazimine enhances long-term memory responses of BCG revaccination
In TB endemic regions TCM cells are drastically exhausted in BCG-vaccinated individuals, for reasons that remain unknown. Nevertheless, it is likely that continuous exposure of environmental mycobacteria might impair the host-protective TCM cell population [17–19]. Moreover, a major failure of the BCG vaccine is its inability to induce high-quality TCM cells [16]. Long-term vaccine efficacy primarily depends upon the balance between TCM and TEM cells generated during immunization [43]. To obtain insight into the effects of clofazimine on memory T cells, we examined the kinetics of TCM and TEM cells in lungs and spleen. In this experiment we also included BCG revaccination with INH treatment as a control group, as INH is one of the important anti-TB drugs. We harvested the spleen at various time points and analysed TCM (CD44hiCD62Lhi) and TEM (CD44hiCD62Llow) cells in both the CD4+ (Fig 2A) or CD8+ T cell subsets (Fig 2B). At 30 and 60 days post infection the number of splenic TCM cells increased significantly in animals that received clofazimine during BCG revaccination in both the CD4+ and CD8+ T cell lineages, as compared with animals that received BCG vaccination, BCG-revaccination, or BCG-revaccination with INH treatment (Fig 2A and 2B). As time progressed from 30 to 60 days the TCM:TEM ratio of CD4+ T cells increased significantly from 1:4 to 1:3 in animals that received clofazimine during BCG revaccination. In contrast, for animals that received only BCG-revaccination or BCG-revaccination with INH treatment the TCM:TEM ratio remained stable at 1:4 or 1:5, respectively, at both 30 and 60 days post infection. Moreover, in BCG-immunized animals the TCM:TEM ratio decreased over time, from 1:5 (day 30) to 1:6 (day 60) (Fig 2C). In CD8+ T cells, the TCM:TEM ratio showed a similar trend as time progressed (Fig 2D). However, in BCG-immunized animals the reduction in the TCM:TEM ratio was more prominent in CD8+ T cells compared with CD4+ T cells (Fig 2C and 2D). In this experiment we employed INH to test whether the antimicrobial properties of drugs have any role in immunomodulation. We found that INH did not exhibit any major immunomodulatory properties, whereas clofazimine increased the efficacy of BCG revaccination by modulating the host immune system. Moreover, to confirm our findings we also determined the in vitro immune modulatory properties of clofazimine and INH in splenic cultures of infected animals. Surprisingly, we found that clofazimine dramatically increased the TCM vs TEM ratio as well as IFN-γ- and IL-17-producing CD4+ cells (S3 Fig). In contrast, INH did not show any immunomodulatory effects. We therefore concluded that clofazimine has substantial immune modulatory effects and that under our experimental conditions it did not have any direct anti-bacterial effects. We also measured IL-7 cytokine receptor α (CD127) expression, as CD127 is responsible for stable maintenance or survival of the TCM cell lineage [44]. We found that clofazimine-treated mice expressed higher levels of CD127 on their TCM cells than the other experimental groups (S4 Fig). We also examined the status of memory T cells in lungs at 60 days post infection and found a similar trend as that of spleen (S5 Fig). Thus, clofazimine treatment during a booster BCG immunization modulates T lymphocyte memory responses to increase the TCM:TEM ratio, which might provide long-term protection against TB.
Clofazimine enhances polyfunctional TCM and TEM cells during BCG revaccination
Memory T cells exhibit profound functional diversity, which depends on a variety of factors, including their differentiation state, tissue homing capacity, long-time survival and expression of cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2). Production of these three major cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2) by polyfunctional T cells is critical for protection against TB [45].
We correlated the functional status of memory T cells by determining IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2-producing cells among the TCM and TEM cell compartments of the different experimental groups of animals. TCM cells isolated from animals that received clofazimine during BCG revaccination exhibited significantly (P ≤0.05) increased levels of TNF-α+IFN-γ+IL-2+ triple-positive (37%), TNF-α+IFN-γ+ (14%), IFN-γ+IL-2+ (9%) and TNF-α+IL-2+ (10%) double-positive T cells as compared with all other groups (Fig 3A). In contrast, animals receiving only BCG revaccination showed significantly increased (P ≤0.05) levels of IFN-γ+TNF-α+ double-positive (6%) TCM cells as compared with H37Rv infected and single BCG vaccinated animals (1,4%), respectively (Fig 3A). However, for TEM cells, mice receiving BCG revaccination with clofazimine showed significantly (P ≤0.05) increased levels of TNF-α+IFN-γ+IL-2+ triple-positive (29%) and IFN-γ+IL-2+ (4%), TNF-α+IFN-γ+ (19%), and TNF-α+IL-2+ 10%) double-positive T cells as compared with BCG-revaccinated animals (15%, 2%, 14% and 9%, respectively) (Fig 3B). Nonetheless, the magnitude of differences for triple-positive cells and IFN-γ+IL-2+ double-positive cells among TCM cells (9%) was higher than among TEM cells (4%). However, the magnitude of TNF-α+IFN-γ+ double-positive cells (19%) was higher among TEM cells. These results indicated that mice receiving BCG revaccination with clofazimine showed enhanced IFN-γ+TNF-α+IL-2+ triple-positive cells in both the TCM and TEM populations (Fig 3A and 3B).
It is well known that M.tb antigen-specific polyfunctional effector T cells are exhausted due to induction of inhibitory receptors such as PD-1 and Tim-3 [26]. As supplementation of clofazimine during BCG revaccination induces higher levels of antigen-specific effector T cells, we determined whether these cells have an exhausted phenotype. Remarkably, expression of these molecules by both CD4 and CD8 cells in animals that received a combination of BCG revaccination plus clofazimine was lower as compared with any of the other experimental groups (S6 Fig). This observation suggested that the antigen-specific T cells induced following BCG revaccination and clofazimine treatment are not exhausted and are functionally active.
Clofazimine induces stem cell-like memory T cells during BCG revaccination
Recently, a new memory T cell subset, T stem cell memory (TSM) cells, was discovered with improved capability of regeneration, differentiation, as well as long-term stability [20–23]. This subset of T cells is thought to be the progenitor of TCM and TEM cells [20]. TSM cells typically express CD45RA and CCR7 and thus phenotypically resemble naïve T cells, but their co-expression of stem cell markers, such as CD95 and CXCR3, distinguishes them from naïve T cells [20], and these cells also express CD122 (IL-2 receptor β), which promotes their self-renewal [22,46]. Antigen-specific TSM cells have been well characterized in viral, parasitic and tumour-specific CD8+ T cells [20–23], and a recent report described M.tb-specific CD4+ TSM cells as the source of TCM and TEM cells [29]. To examine these cells, we first identified CD4+CD62L+CD45RA+ naïve T cells and subsequently analysed expression of CD95 and CD122 (Fig 4A). We found a significant increase (P ≤0.05) in CD4+ TSM (CD62L+CD45RA+CD95+CD122+) cells in animals receiving BCG revaccination and clofazimine (40%) compared with mice receiving only BCG vaccination (27%) or revaccination (33%) (Fig 4A). Unstained control of CD122 and CD95 are shown separately with all other unstained control of different experiments (S7 Fig).
It has been recently reported that IL-17 is one of the key players in memory T cell generation. IL-17 promotes TSM cell generation by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway, which restricts antigen-specific T cells to the naïve compartment and ultimately shifts them towards TSM cells [47]. We examined if clofazimine has a role in the generation of IL-17-producing T cells. A combination of IL-6 and TGF-β is required for the differentiation of IL-17-producing T cells [48]. We tested if clofazimine has any influence on the production of these cytokines in macrophages. We challenged macrophages with complete soluble antigen (CSA), treated them with clofazimine, and via intracellular staining assessed the cytokines IL-6 and TGF-β. We found that clofazimine treatment increased the percentage of IL-6-producing cells, whereas levels of TGF-β were almost unchanged by clofazimine treatment (Fig 4B). Furthermore, when these clofazimine-treated and untreated macrophages were co-cultured with T cells isolated from OT-II TCR transgenic mice in the presence of ovalbumin, we found a subtle increase in IL-17-producing transgenic T cells (Fig 4C) expressing high levels of the transcription factor RORγt (Fig 4D) in the clofazimine-treated group. Therefore, our results suggest that clofazimine treatment creates a niche for the generation of IL-17-producing T helper 17 cells that promote the differentiation of TSM cells.
Clofazimine enhances IFN-γ and IL-17 responses during BCG revaccination
It is well known that Th1 responses provide host protection against M.tb infection. However, Th17 responses are also required for protection against secondary infection and generation of long-term memory responses [49,50]. Therefore, we quantified different CD4+ T cell subsets based on their signature cytokine production in our experimental groups at 60 days post infection. We found that IFN-γ and IL-17 producing cells were significantly increased (Fig 5A and 5B), whereas IL-4 producing Th2 cells were reduced in animals that received BCG revaccination and clofazimine treatment (Fig 5A). This observation prompted us to measure the Treg population. We found that the Treg population (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ cells) was also significantly decreased (Fig 5C). Together, these data indicated that clofazimine treatment increases the protective IFN-γ and IL-17 immune response, which promotes memory T cell generation. We also measured cytokines from splenocyte culture supernatants and found that clofazimine treatment significantly enhanced the levels of IL-2, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-12, and IL-6 and decreased the levels of IL-10. Moreover, there was a stable maintenance of IL-1β among the animals receiving different treatments (Fig 5D). Enhancement in the levels of IL-2, TNF-α, and IFN-γ (Fig 5D) corroborated the finding that clofazimine treatment enhances the levels of polyfunctional memory T cells. Moreover, the increased level of IL-6 (Fig 5D) suggested that clofazimine treatment establishes a cytokine milieu that promotes Th17 cell generation.
Clofazimine promotes conversion of IL-17-producing Th17 cells into TSM-like cells
Recently, it has been shown that Th17 cells transform into less-differentiated, naïve-like T cells that preserve the signatures of stem cell-like memory cells in the tumour environment [51,52]. To test if Th17 cells could be transformed into TSM cells during BCG vaccination, we examined the expression of IL-17 in TSM cells. We gated cells on CD45RA+CD62L+ naïve phenotype cells and analysed IL-17 production among CD95+ cells. We found that animals receiving BCG revaccination and clofazimine contained significantly higher numbers of IL-17-producing TSM cells compared with all other groups (Fig 6A). Furthermore, to provide further evidence for the notion that IL-17-producing cells are Th17 cells and gradually differentiated into TSM cells, we investigated the expression of RORγt, the signature transcription factor of Th17 cells, and tcf-7, a downstream component of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway that promotes cell plasticity. We found that clofazimine treatment during BCG revaccination upregulated both RORγt and tcf-7 expression (Fig 6B). This result is in agreement with a published report that in the cancer microenvironment, IL-17-producing Th17 cells transform into TSM cells due to expression of tcf-7 [47]. We also analysed expression of t-bet, which is the signature marker of Th1 cells, to test the possibility that Th17 cells that transform into TSM cells may eventually convert into host-protective Th1 cells. Surprisingly, we found significantly increased tcf-7 and t-bet expression in T cells from mice that received BCG revaccination and clofazimine (Fig 6B). Recent studies have also shown that plasticity of Th17 cells has a role in acquiring enhanced memory T cell responses [51,53]. To confirm our result, we determined the status of another marker for cell plasticity, CD27. We found that clofazimine treatment significantly enhanced the level of CD27 expression in IL-17-producing cells (Fig 6C). To provide further support for this notion, and to provide insight into the capacity of IL-17-producing cells to transform into IFN-γ-producing cells, we investigated the status of IL-17 expression among IFN-γ-producing cells. Our data clearly showed a 3-fold enhancement in the expression of IL-17+IFN-γ+ dual-positive cells in clofazimine-treated BCG-revaccinated animals compared with BCG-immunized or BCG-revaccinated animals (Fig 6D). Therefore, these findings suggest that clofazimine treatment during BCG revaccination enhances IL-17-producing T cells, which are then converted to TSM cells that provide long-term memory responses by converting into host-protective, IFN-γ-producing Th1 cells.
Discussion
M.tb has co-evolved with its human host since the pre-historic era [54] and has acquired various mechanisms to alter host protective immune responses so as to survive and replicate within the host. BCG, the only usable vaccine available, has been used since its inception in 1921, but its efficacy against adult pulmonary TB is unsatisfactory. However, it is sufficiently efficacious to protect against tubercular meningitis and disseminated TB in young children. The lack of BCG’s efficacy against adult pulmonary TB might be due to: (i) insufficient strength of the immune response, (ii) short-lived immune response, (iii) induction of anergy in memory T cells due to high antigen exposure, and/or (iv) antigen-specific memory cells are present in the periphery but fail to migrate to the site of infection in the lung. Previously, we and others have shown that BCG mounts strong Th1 responses but mounts only limited Th17 responses, which are required for optimal vaccine efficacy [17,18].
In most areas of the world where TB is prevalent vaccination with BCG is required by law. Although BCG induces a small pool of long-term TCM cells, these cells become exhausted over time due to chronic exposure by environmental mycobacteria [17–19]. Recently, we showed that clofazimine increased the TCM pool in BCG-vaccinated animals [28]. A recent clinical trial further showed that revaccination of BCG during adolescence increases TB protective immune responses over a single neonatal dose of BCG vaccination in a high transmission setting [55]. However, considerable literature suggests that addition of an immunomodulator improves BCG vaccine efficacy [14]. Based on these concepts we treated mice with a low dose of clofazimine during BCG revaccination, which similarly caused an increase in the TCM population without significant alterations in the TEM population. Recently, the quality of memory T cell responses has been evaluated by measuring antigen-specific cytokine production. Although cytokine production is an important function of memory T cells, their homing capacity is critical as well. Therefore, we investigated the polyfunctional properties of TCM and TEM cells. Prior studies have established that TNF-α+IFN-γ+IL-2+ triple-positive, polyfunctional T cells exhibit the most potent protection against TB [45]. In this context, some reports indicated that TNF-α+IFN-γ+ double-positive T cells correlate with high bacterial burden, whereas IFN-γ+IL-2+ or IL-2+ T cells correlate with low bacterial burden and increased long-term memory responses [56]. Our results demonstrated that clofazimine treatment enhanced IFN-γ+TNF-α+IL-2+ triple-positive polyfunctional T cells within both the TCM and TEM cell compartments, which give rise to long-term memory responses. Moreover, these cells did not exhibit an exhausted phenotype and were functionally active.
Recently, another subset of memory T cells was found which possesses characteristics of both naïve T cells and stem cells, called TSM cells. This subset of memory T cells was identified for CD8+ T cells during virus infection [20,22]. Further studies also identified this subset in the CD4+ T cell population [20,22,29]. The most exciting character of TSM cells is that they can differentiate into TCM or TEM cells and can proliferate extensively. TSM cells are the only memory T cell subset with the ability to reconstitute the entire heterogeneous population of memory T cells [22,57]. Thus, TSM cells are now considered the most important T cell subset for providing long-term memory [22]. Our study showed that this memory T cell subset is expanded by clofazimine following BCG revaccination. Interestingly, these TSM cells preserved the molecular signature of Th17 cells, which likely contributes to disease protection [50,58]. Previous reports have shown that Th17 cells exhibit activated Wnt/β-catenin signalling that helps in restricting T cells to the naïve compartment and promotes the generation of TSM cells [47,51]. It has also been shown that the molecular signature of Th17 cells can be down regulated with concomitant upregulation of Th1 type transcripts (i.e. tbx21 and IFN-γ) and ultimately such long-lived, ex-Th17 cells acquired T-bet expression and converted to Th1 cells [47]. In our study we found that clofazimine treatment enhances the frequency of TSM cells as well as Th17 cells. It is now increasingly clear that Th17 cells transform into long-lived and less differentiated memory T cells, which in the long-term behave very similar to memory cells that differentiated from Th1 cells. Despite having limited plasticity Th17 cells mount superior recall responses as compared with Th1 cells. Due to activation of Wnt/β-catenin signalling and Tcf-7 expression in Th17 cells these cells exhibit enhanced plasticity [47] and might de-differentiate into naïve-like or early memory T cells. Here, we provided evidence that clofazimine enhances the plasticity of Th17 cells during BCG revaccination. This strategy maintains a stable pool of TCM or TEM cells due to increases in the TSM population. Our previous work along with that of other groups has shown that Th1 and Th17 cell responses are predominantly required for enhanced protective memory T cell responses [12]. Improved memory responses were generated by suppressing Th2 and Treg cells [14]. In this study we found a trend for increased Th1 and Th17 cells and reduced Treg and Th2 cells induced by clofazimine after BCG revaccination. Cytokine analysis from culture supernatant also confirmed that host-protective Th1 and Th17 cells were increased in animals that received BCG revaccination and clofazimine, as levels of the Th1 type cytokines IL-12 and IFN-γ and the Th17 polarizing cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 were increased [59]. In this context, several prior recent studies have demonstrated that the combination of TGF-β and IL-6 promotes the differentiation of Th17 cells and inhibits Treg cell differentiation in mice [48,59], whereas TGF-β plus retinoic acid inhibits Th17 cell differentiation and promotes Treg cells [60]. The enhanced levels of IL-6, IL-1β and moderate levels of TGF-β found in mice treated with clofazimine and BCG revaccination might aid in the differentiation of Th17 cells with a reciprocal decrease in Treg cell differentiation. This pattern of Th cell subsets might induce superior memory T cell responses that provide long-term protection against M.tb infection. Furthermore, increased Th17 cells may help in the generation of TSM cells, as found in other disease models [50]. It is also apparent that TSM cells convert into TCM or TEM cells as well as produce long-term memory responses by rejuvenating themselves. Although it appears that TSM cells are critical for long term vaccine efficacy, harnessing these cells for vaccine improvement is yet to be accomplished.
In summary, since optimal host protection against TB requires Th1 and Th17 responses, vaccine candidates should aim at inducing TCM cells capable of producing Th1 and Th17 cytokines. Since TEM cells give rise to effector cells that may cause inflammation, vaccines that promote TCM over TEM responses might be desired. Recent reports have indicated that TCM and TEM cells are derived from TSM cells, a subset of memory long-lived, self-renewing memory T cells. Therefore, a successful vaccine candidate might involve TSM cells that can give rise to both Th1 and Th17 cytokine-producing T cells. Since testing new vaccine candidates takes several decades, approaches that employ individuals previously vaccinated with BCG are meritorious. Our novel approach employs clofazimine, an approved drug, which showed efficacy for enhancing protective immune responses during revaccination in mice. A similar approach could be employed to enhance BCG vaccine efficacy in humans and warrants further investigation.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the grant provided to GD from Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (grant BT/PR6312/MED/29/605/2012) and grant provided to Special Center for Molecular Medicine, JNU, India (core research grant). Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, provided Junior research fellowship and Senior research fellowship to SA and CSIR-Senior Research Associateship (Pool scientist scheme; pool number: 8802/A) to DB. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.WHO (2010) Global tuberculosis control report 2010. Summary. Cent Eur J Public Health 18: 237 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pawlowski A, Jansson M, Skold M, Rottenberg ME, Kallenius G (2012) Tuberculosis and HIV co-infection. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002464 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zumla A, Raviglione M, Hafner R, von Reyn CF (2013) Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 368: 745–755. 10.1056/NEJMra1200894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Becker Y (2004) The changes in the T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 2 (Th2) cytokine balance during HIV-1 infection are indicative of an allergic response to viral proteins that may be reversed by Th2 cytokine inhibitors and immune response modifiers—a review and hypothesis. Virus Genes 28: 5–18. 10.1023/B:VIRU.0000012260.32578.72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bhattacharya D, Danaviah S, Muema DM, Akilimali NA, Moodley P, Thumbi N, et al. (2017) Cellular Architecture of Spinal Granulomas and the Immunological Response in Tuberculosis Patients Coinfected with HIV. Front Immunol 8: 1120 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mutis T, Cornelisse YE, Ottenhoff TH (1993) Mycobacteria induce CD4+ T cells that are cytotoxic and display Th1-like cytokine secretion profile: heterogeneity in cytotoxic activity and cytokine secretion levels. Eur J Immunol 23: 2189–2195. 10.1002/eji.1830230921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Haanen JB, de Waal Malefijt R, Res PC, Kraakman EM, Ottenhoff TH, de Vries RR et al. (1991) Selection of a human T helper type 1-like T cell subset by mycobacteria. J Exp Med 174: 583–592. 10.1084/jem.174.3.583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bhattacharya D, Dwivedi VP, Maiga M, Maiga M, Van Kaer L, Bishai WR, et al. (2014) Small molecule-directed immunotherapy against recurrent infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem 289: 16508–16515. 10.1074/jbc.M114.558098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cooper AM, Dalton DK, Stewart TA, Griffin JP, Russell DG, Orme IM (1993) Disseminated tuberculosis in interferon gamma gene-disrupted mice. J Exp Med 178: 2243–2247. 10.1084/jem.178.6.2243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dwivedi VP, Bhattacharya D, Chatterjee S, Prasad DV, Chattopadhyay D, Van Kaer L et al. (2012) Mycobacterium tuberculosis directs T helper 2 cell differentiation by inducing interleukin-1beta production in dendritic cells. J Biol Chem 287: 33656–33663. 10.1074/jbc.M112.375154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ravindran R, Krishnan VV, Khanum A, Luciw PA, Khan IH (2013) Exploratory study on plasma immunomodulator and antibody profiles in tuberculosis patients. Clin Vaccine Immunol 20: 1283–1290. 10.1128/CVI.00213-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chatterjee S, Dwivedi VP, Singh Y, Siddiqui I, Sharma P, Van Kaer L, et al. (2011) Early secreted antigen ESAT-6 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes protective T helper 17 cell responses in a toll-like receptor-2-dependent manner. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002378 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Khader SA, Cooper AM (2008) IL-23 and IL-17 in tuberculosis. Cytokine 41: 79–83. 10.1016/j.cyto.2007.11.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bhattacharya D, Dwivedi VP, Kumar S, Reddy MC, Van Kaer L, Moodley P, et al. (2014) Simultaneous inhibition of T helper 2 and T regulatory cell differentiation by small molecules enhances Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccine efficacy against tuberculosis. J Biol Chem 289: 33404–33411. 10.1074/jbc.M114.600452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ahlers JD, Belyakov IM (2010) Memories that last forever: strategies for optimizing vaccine T-cell memory. Blood 115: 1678–1689. 10.1182/blood-2009-06-227546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Henao-Tamayo MI, Ordway DJ, Irwin SM, Shang S, Shanley C, Orme IM (2010) Phenotypic definition of effector and memory T-lymphocyte subsets in mice chronically infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17: 618–625. 10.1128/CVI.00368-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Masopust D, Ha SJ, Vezys V, Ahmed R (2006) Stimulation history dictates memory CD8 T cell phenotype: implications for prime-boost vaccination. J Immunol 177: 831–839. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.2.831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wirth TC, Harty JT, Badovinac VP (2010) Modulating numbers and phenotype of CD8+ T cells in secondary immune responses. Eur J Immunol 40: 1916–1926. 10.1002/eji.201040310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wirth TC, Xue HH, Rai D, Sabel JT, Bair T, Harty JT, et al. (2010) Repetitive antigen stimulation induces stepwise transcriptome diversification but preserves a core signature of memory CD8(+) T cell differentiation. Immunity 33: 128–140. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.06.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gattinoni L, Lugli E, Ji Y, Pos Z, Paulos CM, Quigley MF, et al. (2011) A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nat Med 17: 1290–1297. 10.1038/nm.2446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lugli E, Dominguez MH, Gattinoni L, Chattopadhyay PK, Bolton DL, Song K, et al. (2013) Superior T memory stem cell persistence supports long-lived T cell memory. J Clin Invest 123: 594–599. 10.1172/JCI66327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gattinoni L, Speiser DE, Lichterfeld M, Bonini C (2017) T memory stem cells in health and disease. Nat Med 23: 18–27. 10.1038/nm.4241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mateus J, Lasso P, Pavia P, Rosas F, Roa N, Valencia-Hernández CA, et al. (2015) Low frequency of circulating CD8+ T stem cell memory cells in chronic chagasic patients with severe forms of the disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9: e3432 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Darrah PA, Patel DT, De Luca PM, Lindsay RW, Davey DF, Flynn BJ, et al. (2007) Multifunctional TH1 cells define a correlate of vaccine-mediated protection against Leishmania major. Nat Med 13: 843–850. 10.1038/nm1592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lindenstrom T, Agger EM, Korsholm KS, Darrah PA, Aagaard C, Seder RA, et al. (2009) Tuberculosis subunit vaccination provides long-term protective immunity characterized by multifunctional CD4 memory T cells. J Immunol 182: 8047–8055. 10.4049/jimmunol.0801592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jayaraman P, Jacques MK, Zhu C, Steblenko KM, Stowell BL, Madi A, et al. (2016) TIM3 Mediates T Cell Exhaustion during Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. PLoS Pathog 12: e1005490 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kroesen VM, Groschel MI, Martinson N, Zumla A, Maeurer M, van der Werf TS, et al. (2017) Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs As Host-Directed Therapy for Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review. Front Immunol 8: 772 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Singh DK, Dwivedi VP, Ranganathan A, Bishai WR, Van Kaer L, Das G (2016) Blockade of the Kv1.3 K+ Channel Enhances BCG Vaccine Efficacy by Expanding Central Memory T Lymphocytes. J Infect Dis 214: 1456–1464. 10.1093/infdis/jiw395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mpande CAM, Dintwe OB, Musvosvi M, Mabwe S, Bilek N, Hatherill M, et al. (2018) Functional, Antigen-Specific Stem Cell Memory (TSCM) CD4(+) T Cells Are Induced by Human Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. Front Immunol 9: 324 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jeon D (2017) WHO Treatment Guidelines for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, 2016 Update: Applicability in South Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 80: 336–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cholo MC, Mothiba MT, Fourie B, Anderson R (2017) Mechanisms of action and therapeutic efficacies of the lipophilic antimycobacterial agents clofazimine and bedaquiline. J Antimicrob Chemother 72: 338–353. 10.1093/jac/dkw426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gocke AR, Lebson LA, Grishkan IV, Hu L, Nguyen HM, Whartenby KA, et al. (2012) Kv1.3 deletion biases T cells toward an immunoregulatory phenotype and renders mice resistant to autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol 188: 5877–5886. 10.4049/jimmunol.1103095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Seder RA, Darrah PA, Roederer M (2008) T-cell quality in memory and protection: implications for vaccine design. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 247–258. 10.1038/nri2274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Raghuvanshi S, Sharma P, Singh S, Van Kaer L, Das G (2010) Mycobacterium tuberculosis evades host immunity by recruiting mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 21653–21658. 10.1073/pnas.1007967107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Keswani RK, Tian C, Peryea T, Girish G, Wang X, Rosania GR (2016) Repositioning Clofazimine as a Macrophage-Targeting Photoacoustic Contrast Agent. Sci Rep 6: 23528 10.1038/srep23528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Baik J, Stringer KA, Mane G, Rosania GR (2013) Multiscale distribution and bioaccumulation analysis of clofazimine reveals a massive immune system-mediated xenobiotic sequestration response. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57: 1218–1230. 10.1128/AAC.01731-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Moliva JI, Turner J, Torrelles JB (2017) Immune Responses to Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Vaccination: Why Do They Fail to Protect against Mycobacterium tuberculosis? Front Immunol 8: 407 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Imkamp FM (1981) Clofazimine (lamprene or B663) in lepra reactions. Lepr Rev 52: 135–140. 10.5935/0305-7518.19810015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Browne SG, Harman DJ, Waudby H, McDougall AC (1981) Clofazimine (Lamprene, B663) in the treatment of lepromatous leprosy in the United Kingdom. A 12 year review of 31 cases, 1966–1978. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 49: 167–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Swanson RV, Adamson J, Moodley C, Ngcobo B, Ammerman NC, Dorasamy A, et al. (2015) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clofazimine in a mouse model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59: 3042–3051. 10.1128/AAC.00260-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Venkatesan K (1989) Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of patients with leprosy. Clin Pharmacokinet 16: 365–386. 10.2165/00003088-198916060-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schaad-Lanyi Z, Dieterle W, Dubois JP, Theobald W, Vischer W (1987) Pharmacokinetics of clofazimine in healthy volunteers. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 55: 9–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ziraldo C, Gong C, Kirschner DE, Linderman JJ (2015) Strategic Priming with Multiple Antigens can Yield Memory Cell Phenotypes Optimized for Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Computational Study. Front Microbiol 6: 1477 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huster KM, Busch V, Schiemann M, Linkemann K, Kerksiek KM, Wagner H, et al. (2004) Selective expression of IL-7 receptor on memory T cells identifies early CD40L-dependent generation of distinct CD8+ memory T cell subsets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 5610–5615. 10.1073/pnas.0308054101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lewinsohn DA, Lewinsohn DM, Scriba TJ (2017) Polyfunctional CD4(+) T Cells As Targets for Tuberculosis Vaccination. Front Immunol 8: 1262 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Orlando V, La Manna MP, Goletti D, Palmieri F, Lo Presti E, Joosten SA, et al. (2018) Human CD4 T-Cells With a Naive Phenotype Produce Multiple Cytokines During Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection and Correlate With Active Disease. Front Immunol 9: 1119 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Muranski P, Restifo NP (2013) Essentials of Th17 cell commitment and plasticity. Blood 121: 2402–2414. 10.1182/blood-2012-09-378653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bettelli E, Carrier Y, Gao W, Korn T, Strom TB, Oukka M, et al. (2006) Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells. Nature 441: 235–238. 10.1038/nature04753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhao DM, Yu S, Zhou X, Haring JS, Held W, Badovinac VP, et al. (2010) Constitutive activation of Wnt signaling favors generation of memory CD8 T cells. J Immunol 184: 1191–1199. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bhatt K, Verma S, Ellner JJ, Salgame P (2015) Quest for correlates of protection against tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 22: 258–266. 10.1128/CVI.00721-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Muranski P, Borman ZA, Kerkar SP, Klebanoff CA, Ji Y, Sanchez-Perez L, et al. (2011) Th17 cells are long lived and retain a stem cell-like molecular signature. Immunity 35: 972–985. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lindenstrom T, Woodworth J, Dietrich J, Aagaard C, Andersen P, Agger EM (2012) Vaccine-induced th17 cells are maintained long-term postvaccination as a distinct and phenotypically stable memory subset. Infect Immun 80: 3533–3544. 10.1128/IAI.00550-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pepper M, Linehan JL, Pagan AJ, Zell T, Dileepan T, Cleary PP, et al. (2010) Different routes of bacterial infection induce long-lived TH1 memory cells and short-lived TH17 cells. Nat Immunol 11: 83–89. 10.1038/ni.1826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Brites D, Gagneux S (2015) Co-evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Homo sapiens. Immunol Rev 264: 6–24. 10.1111/imr.12264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nemes E, Geldenhuys H, Rozot V, Rutkowski KT, Ratangee F, Bilek N, et al. (2018) Prevention of M. tuberculosis Infection with H4:IC31 Vaccine or BCG Revaccination. N Engl J Med 379: 138–149. 10.1056/NEJMoa1714021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pollock KM, Whitworth HS, Montamat-Sicotte DJ, Grass L, Cooke GS, Kapembwa MS, et al. (2013) T-cell immunophenotyping distinguishes active from latent tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 208: 952–968. 10.1093/infdis/jit265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cieri N, Oliveira G, Greco R, Forcato M, Taccioli C, Cianciotti B, et al. (2015) Generation of human memory stem T cells after haploidentical T-replete hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 125: 2865–2874. 10.1182/blood-2014-11-608539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang Y, Joe G, Hexner E, Zhu J, Emerson SG (2005) Host-reactive CD8+ memory stem cells in graft-versus-host disease. Nat Med 11: 1299–1305. 10.1038/nm1326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Miyahara Y, Odunsi K, Chen W, Peng G, Matsuzaki J, Wang RF, (2008) Generation and regulation of human CD4+ IL-17-producing T cells in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 15505–15510. 10.1073/pnas.0710686105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mucida D, Park Y, Kim G, Turovskaya O, Scott I, Kronenberg M, et al. (2007) Reciprocal TH17 and regulatory T cell differentiation mediated by retinoic acid. Science 317: 256–260. 10.1126/science.1145697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.