Skip to main content
Journal of Lipid Research logoLink to Journal of Lipid Research
. 2020 Apr 14;61(6):830–839. doi: 10.1194/jlr.RA120000632

Dietary plant stanol ester supplementation reduces peripheral symptoms in a mouse model of Niemann-Pick type C1 disease[S]

Inês Magro dos Reis *, Tom Houben *, Yvonne Oligschläger *, Leoni Bücken *, Hellen Steinbusch , David Cassiman §,**, Dieter Lütjohann ††, Marit Westerterp §§, Jos Prickaerts , Jogchum Plat ***, Ronit Shiri-Sverdlov *,1
PMCID: PMC7269767  PMID: 32291331

Abstract

Niemann-Pick type C (NPC)1 disease is a rare genetic condition in which the function of the lysosomal cholesterol transporter NPC1 protein is impaired. Consequently, sphingolipids and cholesterol accumulate in lysosomes of all tissues, triggering a cascade of pathological events that culminate in severe systemic and neurological symptoms. Lysosomal cholesterol accumulation is also a key factor in the development of atherosclerosis and NASH. In these two metabolic diseases, the administration of plant stanol esters has been shown to ameliorate cellular cholesterol accumulation and inflammation. Given the overlap of pathological mechanisms among atherosclerosis, NASH, and NPC1 disease, we sought to investigate whether dietary supplementation with plant stanol esters improves the peripheral features of NPC1 disease. To this end, we used an NPC1 murine model featuring a Npc1-null allele (Npc1nih), creating a dysfunctional NPC1 protein. Npc1nih mice were fed a 2% or 6% plant stanol ester-enriched diet over the course of 5 weeks. During this period, hepatic and blood lipid and inflammatory profiles were assessed. Npc1nih mice fed the plant stanol-enriched diet exhibited lower hepatic cholesterol accumulation, damage, and inflammation than regular chow-fed Npc1nih mice. Moreover, plant stanol consumption shifted circulating T-cells and monocytes in particular toward an anti-inflammatory profile. Overall, these effects were stronger following dietary supplementation with 6% stanols, suggesting a dose-dependent effect. The findings of our study highlight the potential use of plant stanols as an affordable complementary means to ameliorate disorders in hepatic and blood lipid metabolism and reduce inflammation in NPC1 disease.

Keywords: inflammation, cholesterol metabolism, diet, dietary lipids, liver, atherosclerosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, lysosomal storage disease


Niemann-Pick type C (NPC) disease is a rare lysosomal storage disorder caused by deleterious mutations in NPC1 or NPC2. It is estimated that NPC disease affects one in 100,000 live births, with mutations in NPC1 occurring in approximately 95% of cases (1). Although caused by different genetic mutations, NPC1 and NPC2 diseases are clinically indistinguishable, as both NPC1 and NPC2 proteins are required for endolysosomal cholesterol efflux. Upon endocytosis, LDLs merge with late endosomes/lysosomes (LELs), where lysosomal acid lipases hydrolyze LDL-derived cholesteryl esters. NPC2, a protein located on the luminal surface of LELs, binds the resulting free cholesterol and directs it to the luminal domain of NPC1, a LEL transmembrane protein. Studies indicate that the NPC1 protein subsequently delivers the free cholesterol to the plasma membrane and to the endoplasmic reticulum, possibly via membrane contact sites between the endoplasmic reticulum and LELs (2, 3). Due to compromised NPC1 protein function, NPC1 disease (OMIM #257220) is characterized by endolysosomal cholesterol and sphingolipid accumulation in all cells (4). The age of onset and clinical features of NPC1 disease are heterogeneous, likely because of the variability of NPC1 mutations among patients (5, 6). Nonetheless, the nervous system of NPC1 disease patients is commonly severely affected, triggering the development of neuropsychiatric disorders and cognitive and motor function degeneration (6). In addition, systemic dysfunctions, such as jaundice, cholestatic disease, hepatosplenomegaly, and liver and pulmonary disease, occur in a significant number of patients. While such systemic symptoms are most severe in the perinatal and infantile stage of the disease and tend to become stable in older NPC1 disease patients, in some cases, peripheral dysfunction can further progress and result in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (69). Although awareness of NPC1 disease has increased in recent years, early diagnosis and curative treatments are still lacking. Miglustat, a sphingolipid synthesis inhibitor, was approved in the European Union in 2009 as the first NPC1 disease-targeted drug (10). While miglustat has been shown to reduce the progression of neurological deterioration in NPC1 disease patients, a report indicates that it has a minor impact on systemic symptoms such as splenomegaly (11). Furthermore, intrathecal administration of 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin to reduce neurological symptom progression in NPC1 disease is currently being evaluated in phase 2/3 clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02534844) (12). Despite promising results, the use of 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin as a therapeutic compound in NPC1 disease faces several challenges, including the administration route and side-effects (12). Finally, a different clinical study is currently evaluating the effects of intravenous 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin administration on hepatic NPC1 disease symptoms (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03887533). Overall, considering the limited amount and scope of NPC1 disease treatments, further research is needed to develop a wider range of interventions that can modify NPC1 disease progression (6, 13).

Lysosomal lipid accumulation is at the core of NPC1 disease pathology and triggers a series of events that culminate in tissue and organ dysfunction. Such events include disturbed lysosomal function and lipid metabolism, as well as increased oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis (1417). The aforementioned pathological mechanisms mirror those observed, though to a lesser extent, in atherosclerosis and NASH. Similarly to NPC1 disease, these metabolic disorders are characterized by lysosomal lipid accumulation in macrophages, which has been shown to be a key factor in disease severity and development (1822).

Notably, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown plant stanol ester supplementation to be beneficial in both NASH and atherosclerosis (23, 24). Plant stanols are essential components of plant cells derived from the saturation of plant sterols, which share a similar chemical structure and biochemical functions as the mammalian cholesterol (25). The average human daily intake of plant stanols is 20–50 mg, of which up to 0.15% is estimated to be effectively absorbed in the small intestine (26, 27). Dietary supplementation with plant stanol esters has well-known plasma cholesterol-lowering effects, presumably because they interfere with intestinal cholesterol absorption (2729). Specifically, dietary plant stanol supplementation has been shown to reduce cellular cholesterol accumulation in NASH and atherosclerosis models. In addition, the aforementioned studies indicate that plant stanol ester supplementation ameliorates hepatic inflammation, a mechanism that also contributes to NPC1 disease severity (23, 30, 31).

Considering the parallels between the pathological mechanisms of NPC1 disease, atherosclerosis, and NASH, the aim of this study was to investigate whether dietary supplementation with plant stanol esters also improves peripheral features in NPC1 disease. To this end, we used a NPC1 disease murine model that expresses a Npc1 allele with a frameshift mutation (Npc1nih) that results in the loss of function of the corresponding NPC1 protein (13). While the Npc1nih allele was originally discovered and maintained in the BALB/c mouse strain, here we used Npc1nih mice with a C57BL/6 genetic background, a model that has been previously described and that results in a more severe NPC1 peripheral disease phenotype (32). To investigate our hypothesis, 2-week-old Npc1nih mice received normal chow or a 2% or 6% plant stanol ester-enriched chow diet for 5 weeks. Npc1wt mice fed regular chow were included as a control group for NPC1 disease phenotype. Npc1nih mice fed a plant stanol-enriched diet showed decreased hepatic cholesterol accumulation, as well as reduced hepatic damage and inflammation. In addition to the localized effects in the liver, plant stanol administration led to a systemic immune shift toward an anti-inflammatory profile, as assessed by FACS analysis of white blood cells. Of note, the effect of plant stanol esters on peripheral NPC1 disease symptoms was overall more pronounced after supplementation of the 6% plant stanol-enriched diet compared with 2% enriched diet, proving the beneficial effect of plant stanols to be dose dependent.

Overall, these findings highlight the potential of plant stanol esters as a widely available and affordable additional tool to ameliorate hepatic symptoms and the phenotype of blood monocytes and T-cells in NPC1 disease patients, in combination with other therapies, such as miglustat and 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice

Male and female Npc1nih mice were derived from heterozygous founders (C57BL/6/Npc1nih). Given the reduced lifespan of Npc1nih mice, as soon as the genotypes of the mice were known, the experimental diets were administered to the mothers, who would transfer the experimental diet to the pups via breastmilk (week 0 of the experiment). After the weaning period, at 14 days of age, mice began being fed the appropriate diet as solid chow. Thirteen and 16 Npc1nih mice received a 2% and 6% plant stanol ester-enriched diet, respectively (manufactured by Arie Blok B.V., Woerden, The Netherlands). Npc1wt and Npc1nih mice fed a regular chow diet (n = 10 and 13, respectively) were included as controls. Mice were housed under standard conditions and given free access to food and water. For an overview of the study setup and dietary plant stanol and sterol composition, please refer to supplemental Figs. S1 and S2, respectively. Blood from the tail vein was collected on weeks 3 and 5 of the experiment, when mice were 35 and 49 days old, respectively. All tissues were isolated and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C or fixed in 4% formaldehyde/PBS. The collection of blood and tissue specimens, biochemical determination of lipids in plasma and liver, RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and qPCR were performed as described previously (3335). All experiments were performed according to Dutch laws and approved by the Animal Experiment Committee of Maastricht University.

GC-MS

Plant sterol (sitosterol, campesterol) and plant stanol (sitostanol, campestanol) content in food was analyzed by GC-MS as described previously (36).

Genotyping

Genotypes of animals were determined by PCR analysis of tail DNA. Toes were clipped at postnatal day 2 and homogenized in DirectPCR-Tail (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany) supplemented with a tenth part proteinase K (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Three hours of incubation at 56°C and agitation at 1,000 rounds per minute on a Thermo Mixer were followed by 45 min of heating at 85°C to inactivate the proteinase. Samples were then spun at full speed in a benchtop centrifuge for 1 min. The PCR reactions were performed with 0.5 ml of the obtained extracts. Each lysate underwent two PCRs. Primers gccaagtaggcgacgact and catctactgggtctccatatgtat identified the wild-type allele and primers gccaagtaggcgacgact and ttccaattgtgatctttccaa identified the mutant allele. Both PCRs were carried out under the same cycling conditions.

Alanine aminotransferase measurements

Plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were measured with the Reflotron® test strips (Roche, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions, using the Reflotron® apparatus.

Immunohistochemistry

Frozen liver sections (7 μm) were fixed in acetone and blocked for endogenous peroxidase by incubation with 0.25% of 0.03% H2O2 for 5 min. Primary antibodies used were against hepatic macrophages [rat anti-mouse cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68), clone FA11] and infiltrated macrophages and neutrophils [rat anti-mouse Mac-1 (M1/70)]. 3-Amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) was applied as color substrate and hematoxylin for nuclear counterstain. Sections were enclosed with Faramount aqueous mounting medium. Pictures were taken with a Nikon digital camera DMX1200 and ACT-1 v2.63 software (Nikon Instruments Europe, Amstelveen, The Netherlands). Infiltrated macrophages and neutrophil cells (Mac-1) were counted by two blinded researchers in six microscopical views (original magnification, 200×) and were indicated as number of cells per square millimeter (cells/mm2). Immunostainings for hepatic macrophages (CD68) were evaluated by an experienced pathologist and given a score in arbitrary units (A.U.).

Plasma FACS analyses

Tail vein blood was collected from Npc1wt and Npc1nih mice on weeks 3 and 5 of the experiment, when mice were 35 and 49 days old, respectively. Stainings were performed using Trucount tubes (BD Biosciences, Breda, The Netherlands), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, to detect the following populations: monocytes (NK1.1-Ly6G-CD11b+; Ly6C) and T-cells (CD3+; CD4+; CD8+). Briefly, heparinized blood samples were mixed and incubated for 10 min in the dark at RT with CD16/32 antibody (eBioscience, Halle-Zoersel, Belgium) to block Fc receptor. Samples were then gently vortexed with the appropriate antibodies and incubated in the dark at RT for 20 min. All antibodies were diluted in FACS buffer (PBS, 0.1% BSA, 0.01% sodium azide). In this study, the following antibodies were used: PE mouse anti-mouse NK-1.1 (1:100), APC-Cy™7 rat anti-mouse Ly-6G (1:100), PE-Cy™7 rat anti-CD11b (1:300), and APC-H7 rat anti-mouse CD4 (1:100) (BD, San Jose, CA); CD3 monoclonal antibody (1:100) and CD8a monoclonal antibody (1:50) (eBioscience™ from Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Diego, CA); and anti-mouse Ly-6C-APC (1:10) (Miltenyi, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Finally, samples were mixed and incubated in the dark at RT for 15 min with an erylysis solution [8.4 g NH4CL + 0.84 g NAHCO3 in 1 liter of water (pH 7.2-7.4)]. Sample stainings were quantified within 1 h using BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the group mean and standard error of the mean. Three sets of data comparisons were performed via two-tailed unpaired t-test: Npc1wtversus Npc1nih mice fed a regular chow diet (#P ≤ 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001; ####P < 0.0001); Npc1nih mice receiving regular chow versus Npc1nih mice fed a 2% or 6% stanol-enriched chow diet (*P ≤ 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001). Data were statistically analyzed using GraphPad Prism software (version 6; GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, CA; www.graphpad.com).

RESULTS

Plant stanol supplementation delays body weight loss in Npc1nih mice and reduces relative liver weight

As reduced weight gain reflects NPC1 disease progression in Npc1nih mice, we monitored the body weight of Npc1nih mice and assessed whether plant stanol supplementation influenced this parameter. From day 12 of the study, which coincided with the weaning period, untreated Npc1nih mice were consistently smaller than Npc1wt mice (Fig. 1A). Npc1nih mice on a 2% plant stanol-enriched diet showed a modest increase in body weight compared with untreated Npc1nih mice until day 22 of the study, although this did not reach statistical significance. On the other hand, 6% plant stanol supplementation effectively rescued the weight of Npc1nih mice between days 12 and 29 of the study. Furthermore, in the last week of the study, a trend toward increased body weight was observed in Npc1nih mice on a 6% plant stanol-enriched diet compared with their untreated counterparts.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Effect of dietary stanol supplementation on weight parameters. A: Body weight of Npc1wt and Npc1nih mice throughout the study period. B, C: Relative liver weight. Statistical analysis was performed by use of two-tailed unpaired t-test (n = 10–16 mice per group). Npc1wtversus Npc1nih mice fed a regular chow diet (#P ≤ 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001; ####P < 0.0001); Npc1nih mice receiving regular chow versus Npc1nih fed 2% or 6% stanol-enriched chow diet (*P ≤ 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001). All error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Additionally, liver weights were analyzed, as hepatomegaly is a prominent systemic feature of NPC1 disease. Although absolute liver weight was comparable between Npc1nih mice and Npc1wt mice, liver weights relative to body weight of untreated Npc1nih mice were higher compared with Npc1wt mice (Fig. 1B, C). Relevantly, relative liver weight of Npc1nih mice fed a 2% and 6% plant stanol-enriched diet was reduced. In addition, absolute liver weights were reduced in Npc1nih mice on a 2% plant stanol-supplemented diet. Overall, these results indicate that dietary supplementation with plant stanol esters ameliorates body weight gain and hepatomegaly in Npc1nih mice.

Decreased plasma and hepatic total cholesterol levels in Npc1nih mice fed a plant stanol-enriched diet

To assess the effect of dietary plant stanol supplementation on lipid metabolism of Npc1nih mice, biochemical analyses of plasma and liver lipids were performed. In line with plant stanols’ well-known plasma cholesterol lowering effect, Npc1nih mice fed a plant stanol-supplemented diet displayed lower levels of plasma total cholesterol (Fig. 2A), but not of plasma total triglycerides (Fig. 2B) compared with untreated Npc1nih mice. Of note, these effects were more pronounced following a 6% stanol-enriched diet. Next, we analyzed hepatic lipid accumulation, a prominent systemic feature of NPC1 disease. As expected, untreated Npc1nih mice displayed higher levels of hepatic cholesterol compared with Npc1wt mice (Fig. 2C). Npc1nih mice that received plant stanol supplementation, particularly at 6%, showed prominently lower levels of hepatic total cholesterol than untreated Npc1nih mice, indicating that plant stanol supplementation reduced hepatic cholesterol levels in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2C). In contrast, plant stanol supplementation showed no effects on hepatic triglyceride accumulation of Npc1nih mice, who displayed lower levels of liver triglycerides than Npc1wt mice (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Lipid metabolism parameters. A, B: Total plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels of Npc1wt and Npc1nih mice on a regular and stanol-supplemented chow diet. C, D: Liver cholesterol and triglyceride levels. E–J: Hepatic lipid metabolism-related gene expression of Cd36, Sr-a, Npc2, Abcg1, Abcg8, and Cyp8b1. Statistical analysis was performed by use of two-tailed unpaired t-test n = 9–15 mice per group for liver gene expression analyses). Npc1wtversus Npc1nih mice fed a regular chow diet (#P ≤ 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001; ####P < 0.0001); Npc1nih mice receiving regular chow versus Npc1nih mice fed 2% or 6% stanol-enriched chow diet (*P ≤ 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001). All error bars represent standard error of the mean.

To better understand changes in hepatic cholesterol accumulation following plant stanol supplementation, hepatic gene expression analysis was performed on cluster of differentiation 36 (Cd36) and scavenger receptor A (Sr-a), which mediate the uptake of modified lipoproteins in macrophages, such as those increased in NPC1 disease patients (37, 38); on Npc2, a protein that transfers free cholesterol within LELs to NPC1; on Abcg1 and Abcg8, which mediate excess sterol efflux from leukocytes and hepatocytes, respectively (39); and on cytochrome P450 family 8 subfamily B member 1 (Cyp8b1), which promotes excess cholesterol excretion by mediating the synthesis of bile acids (Fig. 2E–J, respectively). Following 2% plant stanol administration, expression of Sr-a and Npc2 decreased in the livers of Npc1nih mice, suggesting a reduction in the uptake of pro-inflammatory modified lipoproteins by macrophages and lower build-up of free cholesterol in LELs of Npc1nih mice. Furthermore, Npc1nih mice on a 2% plant stanol-enriched diet displayed higher expression of Cyp8b1, suggesting increased conversion of excess hepatic cholesterol into bile acids. Likewise, Npc1nih mice on a 6% plant stanol-enriched diet displayed lower hepatic expression of Sr-a and Npc2 and increased expression of Cyp8b1 than their untreated counterparts. In addition to improving expression of the aforementioned genes, 6% plant stanol supplementation reduced hepatic expression of Cd36 and increased expression of Abcg8, suggesting reduced uptake of modified lipoproteins and increased excretion of excess cholesterol in hepatocytes of Npc1nih mice. Finally, Npc1nih mice displayed lower hepatic expression of Abcg1, suggesting reduced efflux of cholesterol and oxysterols in macrophages. Overall, these findings indicate that, besides lowering plasma cholesterol levels, plant stanols reduce cholesterol accumulation in the liver of Npc1nih mice in a dose-dependent manner.

Dietary plant stanol supplementation improves hepatic damage and inflammation in Npc1nih mice

Following the observed improvements in hepatic cholesterol metabolism, we next investigated the effects of plant stanol supplementation on hepatic damage and inflammation. Plasma ALT levels of untreated Npc1nih mice showed a near 4-fold increase in relation to Npc1wt mice, indicating increased liver damage in Npc1nih mice (Fig. 3A). Remarkably, after dietary plant stanol supplementation, plasma ALT levels of Npc1nih mice were comparable to Npc1wt mice, indicating a strong decrease in overall liver damage. We further looked into hepatic inflammatory status via immunohistochemistry by measuring CD68 and Mac-1 proteins, which identify resident hepatic macrophages and infiltrated neutrophils and macrophages, respectively (Fig. 3B–E). Untreated Npc1nih mice displayed higher levels of immune cells in both immunostainings, indicating prominent hepatic inflammation in Npc1nih mice. The number of hepatic immune cells, particularly in the case of infiltrated neutrophils and macrophages, was reduced following plant stanol supplementation. To further assess the effects of plant stanol supplementation on liver inflammation, hepatic gene expression analyses were performed on Tnf-α, Cd68, cathepsin D (Ctsd), macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (Mip2), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 (Ccl3), and arginase 1 (Arg1) (Fig. 3F–K). Hepatic gene expression of inflammatory markers was consistently increased in untreated Npc1nih mice compared with Npc1wt mice, and decreased in the case of Arg1, a marker for alternatively activated macrophages. Both 2% and 6% plant stanol supplementation reversed these observations, supporting the aforementioned findings that Npc1nih mice fed a plant stanol ester-supplemented diet display lower hepatic inflammation and damage.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Effect of dietary stanol supplementation on hepatic inflammation. A: Plasma ALT levels. B–E: Representative pictures of liver sections stained for hepatic macrophages (CD68) and infiltrated macrophages and neutrophils (Mac-1). CD68 immunostainings were scored (B, C), whereas Mac-1-positive cells were counted (D, E). F–K: Hepatic gene expression of inflammatory markers Tnf-α, Cd68, Ctds, Mip2, Ccl3, and Arg1. Statistical analysis was performed by use of two-tailed unpaired t-test (n = 9–15 mice per group for liver gene expression analyses). Npc1wtversus Npc1nih mice fed a regular chow diet (#P ≤ 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001; ####P < 0.0001); Npc1nih mice receiving regular chow versus Npc1nih mice fed 2% or 6% stanol-enriched chow diet (*P ≤ 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001). All error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Plant stanol supplementation shifts plasma profile of immune cells toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype

To better understand the effects of plant stanol supplementation on systemic inflammation, we investigated monocyte and T-cell populations by FACS analysis in the blood of 35- and 49-day-old Npc1nih mice. To analyze the profile of circulating monocytes, we targeted Ly6C, a protein highly expressed in pro-inflammatory monocytes (30, 40, 41). Untreated Npc1nih mice displayed higher relative levels of Ly6Chigh monocytes and lower relative levels of Ly6Clow monocytes in the blood than Npc1wt mice on both time points (Fig. 4A, B), suggesting higher amounts of pro-inflammatory monocytes and lower levels of anti-inflammatory monocytes, respectively. While Npc1nih mice on a 2% plant stanol diet displayed lower levels of Ly6Chigh monocytes at 49 days old alone, 6% plant stanol supplementation reduced the relative amount of circulating Ly6Chigh monocytes at both time points, suggesting a reduction in circulating pro-inflammatory monocytes. Furthermore, for 2% and 6% plant stanol supplementation, a trend toward an increase in blood Ly6Clow monocytes was observed in 49-day-old Npc1nih mice. In addition, 6% plant stanol supplementation effectively triggered an increase in circulating Ly6Clow monocytes in 35-day-old Npc1nih mice. Concerning blood T-cell populations, untreated Npc1nih mice displayed higher levels of CD8+ T-cells compared with Npc1wt mice at 35 days of age, but not at 49 days old, whereas levels of CD4+ T-cells were lower in untreated Npc1nih mice at both time points (Fig. 4C, D). Although plant stanol supplementation had no effect on CD8+ T-cells in 35-day-old Npc1nih mice, Npc1nih mice following 6% plant stanol supplementation displayed lower levels of CD8+ T-cells at 49 days of age. Finally, although plant stanol supplementation did not significantly increase circulating helper T-cells in Npc1nih mice, a trend was observed suggesting this effect for 6% plant stanol supplementation in 35-day-old Npc1nih mice. Overall, these results indicate that dietary plant stanol supplementation shifted the ratio of pro- and anti-inflammatory circulating monocytes and T-cells toward a more anti-inflammatory phenotype.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Effect of dietary stanol supplementation on plasma monocyte and T-cell phenotype. A–H: Relative levels of plasma pro-inflammatory (LyC6high) and anti-inflammatory (LyC6low) monocytes, as well as cytotoxic (CD8+) and helper T-cells (CD4+) were measured by FACS analysis on weeks 3 and 5 of the study, when mice were 35 and 49 days old. Statistical analysis was performed by use of two-tailed unpaired t-test (n = 5 mice per group). Npc1wtversus Npc1nih mice fed a regular chow diet (#P ≤ 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001; ####P < 0.0001); Npc1nih mice receiving regular chow versus Npc1nih mice fed 2% or 6% stanol-enriched chow diet (*P ≤ 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001). All error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Altogether, these findings indicate that dietary plant stanol ester supplementation improves hepatic lipid metabolism and reduces damage and inflammation in NPC1 disease. In addition, plant stanol supplementation shifts the phenotype of blood immune cells toward a more anti-inflammatory profile in NPC1 disease, particularly at higher concentrations.

DISCUSSION

In NPC1 disease, whole-body lysosomal lipid accumulation triggers a cascade of pathological events that culminates in a wide range of peripheral and neurological symptoms. In addition, early diagnosis and effective therapeutic tools are currently lacking for NPC1 disease, making it a severe and lethal condition that warrants further research in order to improve quality of life and lifespan of patients. In this study, we show that dietary plant stanol ester supplementation improves progressive weight loss, as well as hepatic cholesterol accumulation and damage in a murine model for NPC1 disease. In addition, the current study shows that dietary plant stanol supplementation shifts the profile of blood immune cells toward a more anti-inflammatory phenotype. Based on these findings, we propose that dietary plant stanol supplementation should be further investigated as a complementary tool to ameliorate hepatic symptoms and the phenotype of blood immune cells in NPC1 disease patients.

While the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of stanols are yet to be fully elucidated, cumulative evidence indicates that these molecules interfere with cholesterol micellar solubilization in the intestines and may further inhibit cholesterol absorption and stimulate cholesterol excretion by activation of LXR transcription factor (42). As such, clinical benefits of increased plant stanol ester consumption are largely attributed to reduced dietary cholesterol absorption and consequent lowering of plasma cholesterol levels. In this study, increased plant stanol ester consumption induced a reduction in plasma and liver cholesterol levels in Npc1nih mice, in line with results from a previous NASH study (43). In addition to the effects of plant stanols on cholesterol absorption, a growing body of findings indicates that these molecules have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties (44). In a previous ex vivo study, sitostanol administration to mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages was shown to induce an anti-inflammatory effect independent of LXR activation. It should be noted that, because diets were not supplemented with cholesterol, mice in this study consumed low amounts of cholesterol. As such, although we cannot exclude a beneficial effect from reduced intestinal cholesterol absorption in Npc1nih mice following increased plant stanol consumption, it is likely that plant stanols’ anti-inflammatory properties also contributed to the observed improvement in hepatic inflammation and damage. Furthermore, in a previous study, pharmacological LXR activation increased brain cholesterol excretion and ameliorated disease burden in Npc1−/− mice (45). As previously mentioned, plant stanol molecules are known LXR activators. As such, it is likely that increased plant stanol molecules improved hepatic pathology in Npc1nih mice via a variety of mechanisms, namely, reduced intestinal cholesterol absorption, anti-inflammatory effects, and LXR activation. In addition to a local effect on hepatic inflammation, dietary plant stanol ester supplementation shifted the profile of plasma monocytes and T-cells in Npc1nih mice toward a more anti-inflammatory phenotype, particularly in the former population. Previously, Brüll et al. (46) have demonstrated that sitostanol administration elicits a TLR2-dependent T-helper 1 shift in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells cultures, even at very low concentrations. Further studies on asthma patient-derived peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures confirmed the findings that sitostanol administration induces a T-helper 1 cell response and, in addition, leads to an increase in numbers and activity of regulatory T-cells (46). It is thus possible that the shift in phenotype of circulating immune cells of Npc1nih mice following plant stanol ester supplementation is derived from the direct effect of plant stanols on circulating immune cell populations. Of note, previous studies found that phytosterol supplementation ameliorates inflammation and oxidative stress in Crohn disease, a disorder which occurs in several NPC1 disease patients (47, 48). Considering the anti-inflammatory effects attributed to plant stanols, it is possible that a plant stanol-enriched diet could also ameliorate the intestinal problems of NPC1 disease patients. If so, this would further enhance the application of plant stanol supplementation as an additional therapeutic tool in NPC1 disease. Of note, unlike stanols, phytosterol molecules are prone to oxidation (49, 50) and may therefore have pro-inflammatory effects if consumed in high amounts. Given the importance of inflammation in NPC1 disease burden (30, 51, 52), phytosterol supplementation should thus be regarded with caution.

Currently, miglustat is the only approved drug for the treatment of NPC1 disease symptoms. While clinical observations indicate that miglustat delays progression of neurological deterioration, the effects of miglustat on systemic features of NPC1 disease remain largely unexplored, as it is specifically prescribed for amelioration of neurological symptoms (10, 11). On the other hand, 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, which previously has been shown to improve systemic symptoms of NPC1 disease in murine models, is currently being evaluated in clinical trials regarding its efficacy on neurological and systemic symptoms (12, 53). While neuroinflammation and degeneration are the largest contributors to reduced quality of life and lifespan of NPC1 disease patients, hepatic, splenic, intestinal, and lung dysfunction are also observed in a significant amount of NPC1 disease patients, particularly in early onset NPC1 disease cases (6, 7, 47, 48). As such, further strategies to reduce systemic manifestations of NPC1 disease and to complement neurologically targeted treatments are required. In the past, cholesterol-lowering therapeutic strategies such as dietary cholesterol restriction and statin administration have been explored in murine NPC1 disease models and patients and found to ameliorate hepatic symptoms (5456). Of note, combined use of dietary plant stanol supplementation and statins amplifies the cholesterol-lowering properties of each intervention in hypercholesterolemic patients (57, 58). As such, it is possible that the administration of statins and plant stanol esters simultaneously has additional benefits to systemic manifestations of NPC1 disease and to improving life quality of NPC1 disease patients. On the other hand, combining several methods to reduce peripheral cholesterol has been controversial in the clinical setting, demanding the need for additional clinical trials to assess the clinical use of combinational approaches to reduce plasma cholesterol (59).

Overall, considering the promising results described here, we propose that dietary plant stanol ester supplementation should be further investigated as a complementary therapeutic tool to ameliorate hepatic symptoms and the phenotype of blood immune cells in NPC1 disease. Plant stanol esters are widely available in functional foods, such as margarine spreads, and have been studied in human populations where they showed very minor side-effects, even when consumed in higher concentrations (24, 60, 61). Nonetheless, it should be further investigated whether increased stanol consumption bears so far unknown side-effects in NPC1 disease, as well as plant stanols’ effects on the nervous system.

Data availability

All data pertaining to the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Lieberman (University of Michigan Medical, USA) for kindly gifting the Npc1nih mice used to generate the mice in this study. The authors further thank Laura Hertz and Maria Imperatrice for their contributions and great technical work in this study. Finally, thanks to Anja Kerksiek, (Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharma­cology, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Germany) for stanol/sterol analysis.

Footnotes

Abbreviations:

ALT
alanine aminotransferase
Arg1
arginase 1
Cd36
cluster of differentiation 36
Cd68
cluster of differentiation 68
Cyp8b1
cytochrome P450 family 8 subfamily B member 1
LEL
late endosome/lysosome
NPC
Niemann-Pick type C
Sr-a
scavenger receptor A

This research was supported by CVON IN-CONTROL Grant (CVON2012-03) and Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Vidi Grant 016.126.327, ASPASIA Grant 015.008.043 (to R.S-S.), and Vidi Grant 917.15.350 (to M.W.). M.W. was supported by a Rosalind Franklin Fellowship from the University Medical Center Groningen. T.H. was supported by a Kootstra Talent Fellowship for talented postdoctoral researchers. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

[S]

The online version of this article (available at https://www.jlr.org) contains a supplement.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Geberhiwot T., Moro A., Dardis A., Ramaswami U., Sirrs S., Marfa M. P., M. T. Vanier, M. Walterfang, S. Bolton, C. Dawson, et al. 2018. Consensus clinical management guidelines for Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 13: 50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li X., Saha P., Li J., Blobel G., and Pfeffer S. R.. 2016. Clues to the mechanism of cholesterol transfer from the structure of NPC1 middle lumenal domain bound to NPC2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 113: 10079–10084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Höglinger D., Burgoyne T., Sanchez-Heras E., Hartwig P., Colaco A., Newton J., C. E. Futter, S. Spiegel, F. M. Platt, and E. R. Eden. 2019. NPC1 regulates ER contacts with endocytic organelles to mediate cholesterol egress. Nat. Commun. 10: 4276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pfeffer S. R. 2016. Clues to NPC1-mediated cholesterol export from lysosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 113: 7941–7943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Millat G., Marçais C., Tomasetto C., Chikh K., Fensom A. H., Harzer K., D. A. Wenger, K. Ohno, and M. T. Vanier. 2001. Niemann-Pick C1 disease: correlations between NPC1 mutations, levels of NPC1 protein, and phenotypes emphasize the functional significance of the putative sterol-sensing domain and of the cysteine-rich luminal loop. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68: 1373–1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Patterson M. C., Clayton P., Gissen P., Anheim M., Bauer P., Bonnot O., A. Dardis, C. Dionisi-Vici, H. H., Klünemann, P. Latour, et al. 2017. Recommendations for the detection and diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C. Neurol. Clin. Pract. 7: 499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kelly D. A., Portmann B., Mowat A. P., Sherlock S., and Lake B. D.. 1993. Niemann-Pick disease type C: diagnosis and outcome in children, with particular reference to liver disease. J. Pediatr. 123: 242–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Staretz-Chacham O., Aviram M., Morag I., Goldbart A., and Hershkovitz E.. 2018. Pulmonary involvement in Niemann-Pick C type 1. Eur. J. Pediatr. 177: 1609–1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Birch N. C., Radio S., and Horslen S.. 2003. Metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma in a patient with Niemann-Pick disease, type C. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 37: 624–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pineda M., Walterfang M., and Patterson M. C.. 2018. Miglustat in Niemann-Pick disease type C patients: a review. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 13: 140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pineda M., Perez-Poyato M. S., O’Callaghan M., Vilaseca M. A., Pocovi M., Domingo R., L. R. Portal, A. V. Pérez, T. Temudo, A. Gaspar, et al. 2010. Clinical experience with miglustat therapy in pediatric patients with Niemann-Pick disease type C: a case series. Mol. Genet. Metab. 99: 358–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ory D. S., Ottinger E. A., Farhat N. Y., King K. A., Jiang X., Weissfeld L., E. Berry-Kravis, C. D. Davidson, S. Bianconi, L. A. Keener, et al. 2017. Intrathecal 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin decreases neurological disease progression in Niemann-Pick disease, type C1: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet. 390: 1758–1768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fog C. K., and Kirkegaard T.. 2019. Animal models for Niemann-Pick type C: implications for drug discovery & development. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 14: 499–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fu R., Yanjanin N. M., Bianconi S., Pavan W. J., and Porter F. D.. 2010. Oxidative stress in Niemann-Pick disease, type C. Mol. Genet. Metab. 101: 214–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rimkunas V. M., Graham M. J., Crooke R. M., and Liscum L.. 2009. TNF-{alpha} plays a role in hepatocyte apoptosis in Niemann-Pick type C liver disease. J. Lipid Res. 50: 327–333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kulinski A., and Vance J. E.. 2007. Lipid homeostasis and lipoprotein secretion in Niemann-Pick C1-deficient hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 1627–1637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lopez M. E., Klein A. D., Hong J., Dimbil U. J., and Scott M. P.. 2012. Neuronal and epithelial cell rescue resolves chronic systemic inflammation in the lipid storage disorder Niemann-Pick C. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21: 2946–2960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hendrikx T., Walenbergh S. M., Hofker M. H., and Shiri-Sverdlov R.. 2014. Lysosomal cholesterol accumulation: driver on the road to inflammation during atherosclerosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Obes. Rev. 15: 424–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Houben T., Oligschlaeger Y., Bitorina A. V., Hendrikx T., Walenbergh S. M. A., Lenders M-H., M. J. J. Gijbels, F. Verheyen, D. Lütjohann, M. H. Hofker, et al. 2017. Blood-derived macrophages prone to accumulate lysosomal lipids trigger oxLDL-dependent murine hepatic inflammation. Sci. Rep. 7: 12550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jeurissen M. L. J., Walenbergh S. M. A., Houben T., Gijbels M. J. J., Li J., Hendrikx T., Y. Oligschlaeger, P. J. van Gorp, C. J. Binder, M. M. P. C. Donners, et al. 2016. Prevention of oxLDL uptake leads to decreased atherosclerosis in hematopoietic NPC1-deficient Ldlr-/- mice. Atherosclerosis. 255: 59–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tabas I., Garcia-Cardena G., and Owens G. K.. 2015. Recent insights into the cellular biology of atherosclerosis. J. Cell Biol. 209: 13–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Libby P. 2012. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 32: 2045–2051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Plat J., Hendrikx T., Bieghs V., Jeurissen M. L. J., Walenbergh S. M. A., van Gorp P. J., E. De Smet, M. Konings, A. C. Vreugdenhil, Y. D. Guichot, et al. 2014. Protective role of plant sterol and stanol esters in liver inflammation: insights from mice and humans. PLoS One. 9: e110758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gylling H., Plat J., Turley S., Ginsberg H. N., Ellegård L., Jessup W., P. J. Jones, D. Lüthohann, W. Maerz, L. Masana, et al. 2014. Plant sterols and plant stanols in the management of dyslipidaemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 232: 346–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gylling H., and Simonen P.. 2015. Phytosterols, phytostanols, and lipoprotein metabolism. Nutrients. 7: 7965–7977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ostlund R. E., McGill J. B., Zeng C-M., Covey D. F., Stearns J., Stenson W. F., and C. A. Spilburg. 2002. Gastrointestinal absorption and plasma kinetics of soy Δ5-phytosterols and phytostanols in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 282: E911–E916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Katan M. B., Grundy S. M., Jones P., Law M., Miettinen T., and Paoletti R.. 2003. Efficacy and safety of plant stanols and sterols in the management of blood cholesterol levels. Mayo Clin. Proc. 78: 965–978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nguyen T. T. 1999. The cholesterol-lowering action of plant stanol esters. J. Nutr. 129: 2109–2112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thompson G. R., and Grundy S. M.. 2005. History and development of plant sterol and stanol esters for cholesterol-lowering purposes. Am. J. Cardiol. 96: 3D–9D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Smith D., Wallom K-L., Williams I. M., Jeyakumar M., and Platt F. M.. 2009. Beneficial effects of anti-inflammatory therapy in a mouse model of Niemann-Pick disease type C1. Neurobiol. Dis. 36: 242–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vilahur G., Ben-Aicha S., Diaz-Riera E., Badimon L., and Padró T.. 2019. Phytosterols and inflammation. Curr. Med. Chem. 26: 6724–6734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Parra J., Klein A. D., Castro J., Morales M. G., Mosqueira M., Valencia I., V. Cortés, A. Rigotti, and S. Zanlungo. 2011. Npc1 deficiency in the C57BL/6J genetic background enhances Niemann-Pick disease type C spleen pathology. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 413: 400–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bieghs V., Wouters K., van Gorp P. J., Gijbels M. J., de Winther M. P., Binder C. J., D. Lütjohann, M. Febbraio, K. J. Moore, M. van Bilsen, et al. 2010. Role of scavenger receptor A and CD36 in diet-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in hyperlipidemic mice. Gastroenterology. 138: 2477–2486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bieghs V., Verheyen F., van Gorp P. J., Hendrikx T., Wouters K., Lutjohann D., M. J. Gijbels, M. Febbraio, C. J. Binder, M. H. Hofker, et al. 2012. Internalization of modified lipids by CD36 and SR-A leads to hepatic inflammation and lysosomal cholesterol storage in Kupffer cells. PLoS One. 7: e34378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bieghs V., van Gorp P. J., Walenbergh S. M., Gijbels M. J., Verheyen F., Buurman W. A., D. E. Briles, M. H. Hofker, C. J. Binder, and R. Shiri-Sverdlov. 2012. Specific immunization strategies against oxidized low-density lipoprotein: a novel way to reduce nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. Hepatology. 56: 894–903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Thelen K. M., Laaksonen R., Päivä H., Lehtimäki T., and Lütjohann D.. 2006. High-dose statin treatment does not alter plasma marker for brain cholesterol metabolism in patients with moderately elevated plasma cholesterol levels. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 46: 812–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kelley J. L., Ozment T. R., Li C., Schweitzer J. B., and Williams D. L.. 2014. Scavenger receptor-A (CD204): a two-edged sword in health and disease. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 34: 241–261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Porter F. D., Scherrer D. E., Lanier M. H., Langmade S. J., Molugu V., Gale S. E., D. Olzeski, R. Sidhu, D. J. Dietzen, R. Fu, et al. 2010. Cholesterol oxidation products are sensitive and specific blood-based biomarkers for Niemann-Pick C1 disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2: 56ra81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tarr P. T., Tarling E. J., Bojanic D. D., Edwards P. A., and Baldán Á.. 2009. Emerging new paradigms for ABCG transporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1791: 584–593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kimball A., Schaller M., Joshi A., Davis F. M., denDekker A., Boniakowski A., J. Bermick, A. Obi, B. Moore, P. K. Henke, et al. 2018. Ly6CHi blood monocyte/macrophage drive chronic inflammation and impair wound healing in diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 38: 1102–1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang J., Zhang L., Yu C., Yang X-F., and Wang H.. 2014. Monocyte and macrophage differentiation: circulation inflammatory monocyte as biomarker for inflammatory diseases. Biomark. Res. 2: 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.De Smet E., Mensink R. P., and Plat J.. 2012. Effects of plant sterols and stanols on intestinal cholesterol metabolism: Suggested mechanisms from past to present. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 56: 1058–1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Plat J., Hendrikx T., Bieghs V., Jeurissen M. L., Walenbergh S. M, van Gorp P. J., E. De Smet, M. Konings, A. C. Vreugdenhil, Y. D. Guichot, et al. 2014. Protective role of plant sterol and stanol esters in liver inflammation: insights from mice and humans. PLoS One. 9: e110758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Plat J., Baumgartner S., Vanmierlo T., Lütjohann D., Calkins K. L., Burrin D. G., G. Guthrie, C. Thijs, A. A. Te Velde, A. C. E. Vreugdenhil, et al. 2019. Plant-based sterols and stanols in health & disease: “Consequences of human development in a plant-based environment?” Prog. Lipid Res. 74: 87–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Repa J. J., Li H., Frank-Cannon T. C., Valasek M. A., Turley S. D., Tansey M. G., and J. M. Dietschy. 2007. Liver X receptor activation enhances cholesterol loss from the brain, decreases neuroinflammation, and increases survival of the NPC1 mouse. J. Neurosci. 27: 14470–14480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Brüll F., Mensink R. P., Steinbusch M. F., Husche C., Lütjohann D., Wesseling G-J., and J. Plat. 2012. Beneficial effects of sitostanol on the attenuated immune function in asthma patients: results of an in vitro approach. PLoS One. 7: e46895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schwerd T., Pandey S., Yang H-T., Bagola K., Jameson E., J. Jung, R. H. Lachmann, N. Shah, S. Y. Patel, C. Booth, et al. 2017. Impaired antibacterial autophagy links granulomatous intestinal inflammation in Niemann-Pick disease type C1 and XIAP deficiency with NOD2 variants in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 66: 1060–1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cavounidis A., and Uhlig H. H.. 2018. Crohn’s disease in Niemann-Pick disease type C1: caught in the cross-fire of host-microbial interactions. Dig. Dis. Sci. 63: 811–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vanmierlo T., Husche C., Schött H. F., Pettersson H., and Lütjohann D.. 2013. Plant sterol oxidation products – analogs to cholesterol oxidation products from plant origin? Biochimie. 95: 464–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Plat J., Brzezinka H., Lütjohann D., Mensink R. P., and von Bergmann K.. 2001. Oxidized plant sterols in human serum and lipid infusions as measured by combined gas-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 42: 2030–2038. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Houben T., Magro dos Reis I., Oligschlaeger Y., Steinbusch H., Gijbels M. J. J., Hendrikx T., C. J. Binder, D. Cassiman, M. Westerterp, J. Prickaerts, et al. 2019. Pneumococcal immunization reduces neurological and hepatic symptoms in a mouse model for Niemann-Pick type C1 disease. Front. Immunol. 9: 3089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Platt N., Speak A. O., Colaco A., Gray J., Smith D. A., Williams I. M., K. L. Wallom, and F. M. Platt. 2016. Immune dysfunction in Niemann-Pick disease type C. J. Neurochem. 136 (Suppl. 1): 74–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ramirez C. M., Liu B., Taylor A. M., Repa J. J., Burns D. K., Weinberg A. G., S. D. Turley, and J. M. Dietschy. 2010. Weekly cyclodextrin administration normalizes cholesterol metabolism in nearly every organ of the Niemann-Pick type C1 mouse and markedly prolongs life. Pediatr. Res. 68: 309–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Somers K. L., Brown D. E., Fulton R., Schultheiss P. C., Hamar D., Smith M. O., R. Allison, H. E. Connally, C. Just, T. W. Mitchell, et al. 2001. Effects of dietary cholesterol restriction in a feline model of Niemann–Pick type C disease. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 24: 427–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Erickson R. P., Garver W. S., Camargo F., Hossian G. S., and Heidenreich R. A.. 2000. Pharmacological and genetic modifications of somatic cholesterol do not substantially alter the course of CNS disease in Niemann-Pick C mice. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 23: 54–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Patterson M. C., Di Bisceglie A. M., Higgins J. J., Abel R. B., Schiffmann R., Parker C. C., C. E. Argoff, R. P. Grewal, K. Yu, P. G. Pentchey, et al. 1993. The effect of cholesterol-lowering agents on hepatic and plasma cholesterol in Niemann-Pick disease type C. Neurology. 43: 61–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rosin S., Ojansivu I., Kopu A., Keto-Tokoi M., and Gylling H.. 2015. Optimal use of plant stanol ester in the management of hypercholesterolemia. Cholesterol. 2015: 706970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Scholle J. M., Baker W. L., Talati R., and Coleman C. I.. 2009. The effect of adding plant sterols or stanols to statin therapy in hypercholesterolemic patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 28: 517–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Linnebur S. A., Capell W. H., Saseen J. J., Wolfe P., and Eckel R. H.. 2007. Plant sterols added to combination statin and colesevelam hydrochloride therapy failed to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. J. Clin. Lipidol. 1: 626–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Berger A., Jones P. J. H., and Abumweis S. S.. 2004. Plant sterols: factors affecting their efficacy and safety as functional food ingredients. Lipids Health Dis. 3: 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gylling H., Hallikainen M., Nissinen M. J., and Miettinen T. A.. 2010. The effect of a very high daily plant stanol ester intake on serum lipids, carotenoids, and fat-soluble vitamins. Clin. Nutr. 29: 112–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Data Availability Statement

All data pertaining to the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Journal of Lipid Research are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES