Abstract
Resistance to cytotoxic T cells is frequently mediated by loss of MHC class I expression or IFNγ signaling in tumor cells, such as mutations of B2M or JAK1 genes. NK cells could potentially target such resistant tumors, but suitable NK cell–based strategies remain to be developed. We hypothesized that such tumors could be targeted by NK cells if sufficient activating signals were provided. Human tumors frequently express the MICA and MICB ligands of the activating NKG2D receptor, but proteolytic shedding of MICA/B represents an important immune evasion mechanism in many human cancers. We showed that B2M- and JAK1-deficient metastases were targeted by NK cells following treatment with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that blocks MICA/B shedding. We also demonstrated that the FDA-approved HDAC inhibitor panobinostat and a MICA/B antibody acted synergistically to enhance MICA/B surface expression on tumor cells. The HDAC inhibitor enhanced MICA/B gene expression, whereas the MICA/B antibody stabilized the synthesized protein on the cell surface. The combination of panobinostat and the MICA/B antibody reduced the number of pulmonary metastases formed by a human melanoma cell line in NSG mice reconstituted with human NK cells. NK cell–mediated immunity induced by a mAb specific for MICA/B, therefore, provides an opportunity to target tumors with mutations that render them resistant to cytotoxic T cells.
Keywords: NK cells, MICA, NKG2D, proteolytic shedding, immunotherapy resistance
INTRODUCTION
Checkpoint blockade with antibodies targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitory receptors on T cells can induce durable antitumor immunity in patients with advanced cancer. However, many patients fail to benefit from these therapies due to primary or secondary resistance (1). Cytotoxic T cells play a central role in the efficacy of checkpoint blockade based on their ability to recognize tumor-derived peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) proteins (2). Recognition of MHC-I–peptide complexes by the T-cell receptor (TCR) triggers T cell–mediated killing via release of cytotoxic granules. Also, secretion of interferon-γ (IFNγ) by T cells inhibits tumor cell proliferation and enhances MHC-I protein expression on both tumor and dendritic cells (3). Resistance to checkpoint blockade is, therefore, frequently mediated by loss of MHC-I expression by tumor cells, either by mutation or epigenetic silencing of key genes in the MHC-I (B2M, TAP1, TAP2, and other genes) or IFNγ (JAK1, JAK2) pathways (4–6). A low number or loss of neoantigens also diminishes tumor immunity mediated by cytotoxic T cells (7–10). There are no alternative immunotherapies for patients with solid tumors resistant to checkpoint blockade. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells could target tumor cells that lack MHC-I proteins, but thus far, CAR T cells have shown limited efficacy against solid tumors (11).
Natural killer (NK) cells recognize tumor cells by molecular mechanisms that differ from those required by cytotoxic T cells. NK-cell recognition of tumor cells is mediated by germline-encoded activating receptors that bind to ligands upregulated on tumor cells by cellular processes associated with malignant transformation, including DNA damage and cellular stress (12). In contrast, T cells recognize MHC-presented peptides derived from shared tumor antigens or neoantigens created by somatic mutations (2). Therefore, tumors resistant to cytotoxic T cells may respond to NK cell–based immunotherapies. In fact, loss of MHC-I expression by tumor cells renders them more sensitive to NK cells because MHC-I proteins serve as ligands for inhibitory NK-cell receptors (12). However, induction of NK cell–mediated tumor immunity may also require effective targeting of immune evasion mechanisms that hinder NK cell–mediated attack. For example, many human cancers express the MHC class I chain-related polypeptide A (MICA) and MICB (MICA/B) proteins that serve as ligands for the activating NK group 2D (NKG2D) receptor on NK cells and subpopulations of T cells (13,14). Tumors frequently evade NKG2D receptor–mediated tumor immunity by proteolytic shedding of MICA/B (15–22). We previously developed monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that bind to the α3 domain of MICA/B, the site of proteolytic shedding. These mAbs inhibit MICA/B shedding and induce NK cell–mediated tumor immunity. The increased density of MICA/B proteins on tumor cells enhances NKG2D receptor–mediated activation of NK cells, and the Fc segment of tumor-bound antibodies activates NK cells through the CD16 Fc receptor. Treatment with such MICA/B antibodies induces a shift of tumor-infiltrating NK cells to a cytotoxic state (23).
The MICA and MICB genes are part of the MHC locus on human chromosome 6, and the encoded proteins share structural similarity with MHC proteins. B2M deficiency abrogates T cell–mediated immunity and responsiveness to T-cell checkpoint blockade, but MICA/B proteins do not associate with β2 microglobulin or peptides (5,24–26). We hypothesized that inhibition of MICA/B shedding could induce NK cell–mediated immunity against metastatic lesions resistant to cytotoxic T cells. Indeed, treatment with a mAb specific for the MICA/B α3 domain enabled NK cell–mediated immunity against tumors with inactivating mutations in the MHC-I or IFNγ signaling pathways (B2m and Jak1 mutations, respectively). Also, it is known that the MICA/B genes are epigenetically regulated by histone deacetylases, which inhibit MICA/B expression by tumor cells (27–30). We found that a HDAC inhibitor acted synergistically with a MICA/B mAb in vivo to enhance MICA/B protein expression on the surface of tumor cells through enhanced transcription of MICA/B genes (via the HDAC inhibitor) and inhibition of MICA/B shedding (via the MICA/B mAb). This combination therapy conferred NK cell–mediated immunity against melanoma metastases in a humanized mouse model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines
B16F10, LLC1, A375, HCT-116, A549, and U937 cell lines were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, Virginia). RPMI-8226 and U266 cell lines were generously donated by Dr. Irene Ghobrial (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts), and the NCI-H139-Sqc cell line was generously donated by Bristol-Myers Squibb (Redwood City, California). The CY029-S1, CY048-S, CY 21A-S1, CY.119–1A S, and CY36-S1 short-term melanoma cell lines were previously described (23,31). All cell lines tested negative for mycoplasma prior to use in experiments using the Universal Mycoplasma Detection Kit (ATCC, catalog number 30–1012K) or MycoAlert™ Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza, catalog number LT07–318). All cell lines were used within a small number of passages (approximately less than 10 passages) after they had been obtained from vendors or collaborators between the years of 2015 and 2019. A375, HCT-116, A549, U937, RPMI-8226, U266, and NCI-H139-Sqc cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 media, whereas the B16F10, LLC1, CY029-S1, CY048-S, CY 21A-S1, CY.119–1A S, and CY36-S1 were grown in DMEM media. RPMI-1640 and DMEM media were supplemented with 10% FBS, 1x Glutamax, and 1x penicillin/streptomycin. All tissue culture reagents were purchased from Gibco (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were cultured at 37 ºC with 5% CO2.
Control and B2M-KO A375 cells were generated by transducing parental A375 cells with a lentiCas9-blast vector (Addgene #52962) followed by selection with blasticidin (Gibco, catalog number R21001). Subsequently, cells were transduced with pLKO3G-gRNA-PGK-EGFP vector, which was reported previously (32), with a gRNA targeting the human B2M genes inserted between the BsmB1 sites. The control cell line was transduced with the backbone of the vector. Following transduction, cells were cultured for 24 hours in the presence of recombinant human IFNγ (10 ng/mL, BD Biosciences) to induce upregulation of MHC-I proteins. Cells were stained with APC-conjugated W6/32 antibody (clone W6/32, Biolegend, catalog number 311410), and HLA-A/B/C-negative B2M-KO cells and HLA-A/B/C-positive control cells were sorted by flow cytometry (BD FACS Aria III). As shown in Figure 1A and Supplementary Figure S1A–B, 100 % of the isolated cell population was B2M-KO. Parental A375 cells were also transduced with a pHAGE lentiviral vector (Harvard Gene Therapy Center) to enable expression of ZsGreen under the control of the EF1α promoter. This vector was generated by inserting the ZsGreen sequence between the NotI and BamHI restriction sites, which removed an IRES and ZsGreen sequence from a parental vector. ZsGreen+ A375 cells were sorted by flow cytometry (BD FACS Aria III) and used to examine MICA/B expression in vivo.
The B16F10 control and B2m-KO cell lines were previously reported (32). MICA expression was achieved by transduction of control and B2m-KO B16F10 cells with a pHAGE lentiviral vector that carried a MICA*009-IRES-luciferase expression cassette under the control of the EF1α promoter. This plasmid was reported previously (23). The B16F10 control and B2m-KO cell lines were labelled with PE-conjugated anti-MICA/B (Biolegend catalog number 320906), and MICA+ cells were sorted by flow cytometry (BD FACS Aria III). Jak1-KO B16F10-MICA cells were generated by electroporation of the control B16F10-MICA cell line with Cas9 protein and a gRNA targeting the Jak1 gene (sequences in Supplementary Table S1). Electroporation was performed using the Amaxa™ SF Cell Line 96-well Nucleofector™ Kit (Lonza, V4SC-2096) in a 4D Nucleofactor (Lonza). Cells were treated for 24 hours with IFNγ (10 ng/mL, BD Biosciences). Subsequently, cells were labeled with PE-conjugated MICA 6D4 antibody (Biolegend, catalog number 320906) and a cocktail of APC-conjugated MHC-I antibodies (anti-H-2Kb and anti-H-2Db, Biolegend catalog numbers 116518 and 111513, respectively). MICA+MHC-I–B2M-KO and MICA+MHC-I+ control B16F10 were then sorted by flow cytometry (BD FACS Aria III).
LLC1 cells were first transduced with a pHAGE lentiviral vector that carried a MICA*009 cDNA – IRES – ZsGreen expression cassette under the control of an EF1α promoter (Addgene #114007). The resulting LLC1-MICA cells were electroporated with Cas9 protein and bound gRNAs targeting the B2m gene. Control cells were electroporated with Cas9 protein alone. Control and B2m-KO LLC1-MICA cells were treated with IFNγ (10 ng/mL; BD Biosciences) for 24 hours and sorted by flow cytometry based on expression of H-2Kb (clone AF6–88.5 Biolegend). Control LLC1-MICA cells were H-2Kb-positive, whereas B2m-KO LLC1 cells were H-2Kb-negative.
Western blotting
B16F10, LLC1, and A375 cell lines were treated with or without IFNγ (50 ng/mL; BD Biosciences) for 16 hours in DMEM supplemented with 10 % FBS (Life Technologies). Subsequently, cells were washed in PBS and lysed in RIPA Lysis and Extraction Buffer (Thermo Scientific, 89901) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich, P8340). Lysates were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 14,000 rpm, 4 °C. Total protein was measured by Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, 23225) and normalized prior to gel loading to 20 μg total protein per lane. Following SDS-PAGE, samples were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad Sequi-Blot PVDF, 1620184), which was blocked in 5 % milk in Tris-buffered saline supplemented with 0.1% Tween. Blots were then incubated overnight with the appropriate primary antibodies: (1:2000 dilution): rat anti-mouse B2M (R&D Systems, mab8325), rabbit anti-human B2M, JAK1, GAPDH, and tubulin (Cell Signaling Technology, 12851, 3344, 8884, 2144). Following 1 hour incubation with HRP-conjugated anti-rat (Cell Signaling Technology, 6502; 1:3000) or anti-rabbit (Jackson Immunoresearch, 211–032-171; 1:10,000) secondary antibodies, proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence (Western Lightning and Perkin-Elmer, NEL104001EA) using a Chemi-Doc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
MICA/B shedding assays
5 × 104 tumor cells (A375, Control A375, B2M-KO A375, CY048-S, CY029-S1, CY.119–1A-S, CY36-S1, CY 21A-S1, HCT-116, A549, RPMI-8226, U266, U937, NCI-H139-Sqc) were cultured for 24 hours in 96-wells plates (flat-bottom for adherent cells or U-bottom for suspension cells) in the presence of different concentrations of antibodies (7C6 or isotypes control clones C1184, MPC-11, or BE0086; all isotypes were from BioXcell), IFNγ (ranging from 10 to 0.01 ng/mL), and/or panobinostat (ranging from 1000 to 0.01 nM, ApexBio, catalog number A8178), as indicated in each figure. Following a 24-hour culture period, plates were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 500 × g, and supernatants were collected for analysis of shed MICA using the Human MICA ELISA Kit (Abcam, catalog number ab59569). To do so, supernatants were diluted 1:2 in the standard dilution buffer provided by the kit, and concentrations were calculated with a standard curve utilizing recombinant MICA variant 008 (ranging from 2000 to 31.25 pg/mL). Plates were read in an EnVision® microplate reader (Perkin Elmer). MICA concentrations were calculated using GraphPad Prism 8 software. We previously demonstrated that the 7C6 mAb does not interfere with detection of MICA shedding using this ELISA (23).
Adherent cells were detached with Versene (Gibco, catalog number 15040–066) to preserve the integrity of MICA/B proteins on the cell surface. Fc receptors were blocked using Human TruStain FcX™ (Biolegend, catalog number 422302), and cells were stained with PE or APC-conjugated anti-human MICA/B clone 6D4 (Biolegend, catalog numbers 320906 or 320908, respectively). The 6D4 antibody binds to the α1- α2 domains of MICA/B and thereby does not compete with the 7C6 antibody that targets the α3 domain of MICA/B, as shown previously (23). Cells were also stained with dead cell markers, either 7-AAD (BD Pharmingen™, catalog number 559925), Zombie UV, Yellow, or Near Infrared (Biolegend, catalog numbers 423108, 423104, and 423106, respectively). Data were acquired using a BD Fortessa X20 or Beckman Coulter CytoFLEX LX, and analyses were performed using FlowJo V10 software.
Mice
Wild-type (WT) C57BL6/J, OT-1, Ighm–/– C57BL6/J, CB6F1/J, and NSG mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratories (catalog numbers 000664, 003831, 002288, 100007, and 005557, respectively). Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– knockout mice were purchased from Taconic (catalog number 4111). Mice were male (except for NSG mice that were female) and 6–8 weeks of age. Mice were housed in the vivarium of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. The institutional committees for animal use approved the procedures used in this study.
Isolation of human and murine NK cells
Human NK cells from healthy individuals (leukoreduction collars) were isolated by negative selection using the EasySep™ Human NK-cell Isolation Kit (Stem Cell Technologies, catalog number 17955), which resulted in NK-cell purities of at least 90%. Leukoreduction collars were provided in an anonymous manner by Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Boston, USA). A total of three leukoreduction collars were used in this study. NK cells were expanded in vitro in G-Rex 6-wells plates (Wilson Wolf, catalog number 80240M) using RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS, 5% human AB serum (Valley Biochemical), IL2 (1,000 U/mL), and IL15 (20 ng/mL)(both cytokines were from BD Biosciences). Media was replenished once per week until NK cells were used for experiments between 1–3 weeks since isolation.
Murine NK cells from tumor-free C57BL/6 mice or CB6F1 were isolated by meshing spleens using a 70 μm cell strainer, followed by red cell lysis (ACK buffer, Gibco) and staining with PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD49b (Biolegend, catalog number 108908) and APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3ε (Biolegend, catalog number 100312). NK cells were sorted by flow cytometry (BD FACS Aria III), yielding typical purities of ~99%. (2 × 105 cells) were immediately injected via tail vein in Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– KO mice for experiments involving allogeneic or syngeneic NK cells.
NK cell–mediated killing assays
For long-term NK cell–mediated killing assays, 1 × 106 GFP+ control and B2M-KO A375 cells were pretreated for 24 hours with MICA/B or isotype control mAbs (20 μg/mL) in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS, 1x Glutamax, and 1x penicillin/streptomycin. Subsequently, tumor cells were detached with Versene, washed with PBS, and plated in black-wall 96-well plates (Corning™, catalog number 3603) at a density of 5×103 cells per well. Human NK cells were added 1–2 hours later at different effector to target ratios as indicated in the figures, and IL2 (300 U/mL, BD Biosciences) was added to support NK-cell survival. The number of GFP+ tumor cells was tracked over time for a total of 72 hours using a Celigo Image Cytometer (Nexcelom Bioscience, Lawrence, USA), as reported previously (33).
For short-term NK-cell killing assays, 1 × 106 A375 melanoma cells were pretreated for 24 hours with MICA/B or isotype control mAbs (20 μg/mL) in tissue culture media and then used as target cells in 4-hour 51Cr-release assays, as described previously (23). Healthy donor-derived human NK cells were isolated by negative selection from leukapheresis reduction collars, as described above, and cultured for 24 hours with IL2 (1,000 U/mL; BD Biosciences) in 96-wells U-bottom plates prior to use in the assay. In some experiments, KIR receptors on NK cells were blocked in the 51Cr-release assay by addition of an isotype control mAb (10 μg/mL) or anti-KIR2DL2/3 plus anti-KIR2DL4 (BioLegend, catalog numbers 312602 and 347003).
CD8+ T-cell cytotoxicity assay
To confirm resistance of Jak1-KO and B2m-KO B16F10-MICA cell lines to CD8+ T cell–mediated cytotoxicity, a Celigo-based image cytometry assay was performed (33). Briefly, 2 × 106 tumor cells were pulsed with 10 nM OVA (SIINFEKL) peptide (Sigma, catalog number S7951) overnight, washed with PBS, and added to 96-well plates (5,000 tumor cells per well). Naïve OT-I CD8+ T cells were isolated from the spleens of OT-I mice (JAX stock number 003831) using EasySep™ Mouse CD8+ T-cell Isolation Kit (StemCell Technologies Inc., catalog number 19853) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The tumor cells were cocultured with naïve OT-I CD8+ T cells at different effector to target ratios (1:0 no T cells; 1:1, 2:1, and 5:1; 8–10 replicates per group). 48 hours later, supernatants were removed, and wells were washed with PBS to remove dead tumor cells and CD8+ T cells. The plate was then analyzed using the Celigo instrument for quantification of live tumor cells.
Bulk RNA-seq analysis of human A375 melanoma cells
Parental A375 cells (1 ×106 cells) were treated for 24 hours with panobinostat (50 nM) or the corresponding volume of PBS. Cells were then detached with Versene, and RNA was isolated with RNeasy Plus Mini Kit and RNase-Free DNase Set, respectively (both Qiagen kits, catalog numbers 74134 and 79254, respectively). Generation of cDNA, sequencing, and analyses were done as previously reported (23). Briefly, RNA sequencing libraries were generated using the Kapa mRNAseq kit (KapaBiosystems), analyzed by Next-Generation Sequencing, and pooled barcoded samples were subjected to VIPER analysis. Data were also analyzed by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis 4 (Broad Institute) software. Data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (accession number GSE145447).
Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)
A375 cells (1 × 106 cells) were treated for 24 hours with panobinostat (50 nM). Subsequently, cells were washed twice with PBS, pelleted, and used for extraction of total RNA using the RNeasy mini kit (#74106, Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One microgram of the extracted RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using SuperScript IV VILO Master Mix (ThermoFisher, 11756050). Diluted cDNA was used for qPCR using TaqMan Gene Expression MasterMix (Life Technologies, 4369016), TaqMan probes (MICA - Hs00741286_m1, MICB - Hs00792952_m1, GAPDH - Hs02786624_g1, ULBP2 - Hs00607609_mH, and RAET1L - Hs04194671_s1) and QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher). To examine changes in gene expression between groups, ΔΔCT values were determined from mean CT values of three technical replicates per sample in each group. Fold change in gene expression was represented relative to GAPDH (a housekeeping gene) for each sample.
Metastasis models in immunocompetent mice
B16F10-MICA tumor cells (control, B2m-KO or Jak1-KO) were inoculated intravenously into C57BL/6 mice (WT or Ighm–/–) via the tail vein (1.0 to 7×105 cells in 100 μL of PBS depending on the experiment, as described in figure legends). Treatment was initiated in Ighm–/– mice when mice had established metastases (day 7 following tumor inoculation) by intraperitoneal injection of isotype control mAb (BioXcell, catalog number BE0085) or 7C6-mIgG2a mAb (200 μg per injection, days 7, 8, and then once per week). In an alternative protocol, WT mice (Ighm+/+) received antibody injections on days 1, 2, and then once per week. Antibodies that induced depletion of CD8+ T cells (100 μg anti-CD8β, BioXcell, catalog BE0223) or NK cells (1:10 dilution anti-asialo GM1, Wako Chemicals, catalog 986–10001, and 100 μg anti-NK1.1, clone PK136, BioXcell) were injected via intraperitoneal route on days −1, 0, and then once per week relative to tumor cell inoculation. Murine IgG1 was used as control IgG (BioXcell, catalog BE0083). Lungs were harvested and metastases were quantified on day 14 under a stereomicroscope following formalin fixation of the tissue. Alternatively, the survival of mice was recorded.
For the LLC1-MICA metastasis model, WT C57BL/6 mice were inoculated intravenously via the tail vein with 1.0 to 1.5×106 tumor cells (as indicated in the figure legends) in 0.1 mL of PBS. 7C6-mIgG2a or isotype control mAbs (200 μg) were administered on days 2, 3, and then once per week relative to tumor cell inoculation. For experiments involving adoptive transfer of NK cells, 2×105 NK cells isolated from the spleens of WT C57BL/6 (syngeneic) or CB6F1/J (allogeneic) mice were injected intravenously into Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– knockout mice. These NK cells were isolated by flow cytometry as CD3ε–CD49b+ cells. LLC1-MICA tumor cells (7×105 cells) were injected intravenously one day following NK-cell transfer. 7C6-mIgG2a or isotype control mAbs (200 μg/injection) were given intraperitoneally on days 2, 3, and then once per week. On day 14, mice (WT or Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– knockout) were euthanized by CO2 inhalation, and Indian ink (30%) was injected into the trachea to enable counting of lung metastases, as previously described (34). Lung tissue was treated using Fekete’s fixative and surface metastases were counted using a stereomicroscope.
Characterization of murine NK cells in the B16F10-MICA metastasis model
WT C57BL/6 mice were inoculated intravenously with 7×105 B16F10-MICA cells that either had the control, B2m-KO, or Jak1-KO genotype. Mice were treated with 7C6-mIgG2a or isotype control mAbs (200 μg/injection) on days 1 and 3 following tumor cell inoculation. On day 12, mice were injected intravenously with 50 μL of APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD45.2 (Biolegend, 109814) to label intravascular immune cells and then were euthanized. Harvest lung tissue was cut into small pieces, resuspended in RPMI-1640 supplemented with collagenase type IV (1 mg/mL, Gibco)), hyaluronidase (0.1 mg/mL, Sigma), and DNase (20 U/mL, Sigma) and processed using a gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with Heaters (Miltenyi) using C tubes (Miltenyi) with the program 37C_m_LDK_1. The cell suspension was then filtered at 70 μm and incubated with mouse TruStain FcX™ (Biolegend, catalog number 101320) and multiple antibodies: PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-mouse CD45.2 (Biolegend, 109830), APC-conjugated anti-mouse CD3ε (Biolegend, 100312), APC-conjugated anti-mouse TCRβ (Biolegend, 109212), BV785-conjugated anti-mouse NK1.1 (BD Biosciences, 740853), PE-CF594-conjugated anti-mouse CD49b (BD Biosciences, 562453), Alexa488-conjugated anti-mouse EOMES (Invitrogen, 53–4875-82), PE-conjugated anti-mouse GZMA (Invitrogen, 12–5831-82), BV421-conjugated anti-mouse NKG2D (BD Biosciences, 562800), PERCP-CY5.5-conjugated anti-mouse CD16/32 (Biolegend, 101324), BV510-conjugated anti-mouse Ly49C/I (BD Biosciences, 744028), and Zombie UV (Biolegend, 423108). Cells were analyzed using a CytoFLEX Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter), and data were processed using FlowJo V10.
Humanized mouse model
NSG mice were inoculated intravenously with human NK cells (1 to 2×106 cells) that had been expanded in vitro as described above. IL2 (Peprotech, catalog number 200–02) was injected intraperitoneally (7.5×104 units) to support in vivo survival of NK cells, as previously reported (23). A375 melanoma cells (5×105 cells, control or B2M-KO) were injected one day later (day 0). One day after tumor cell inoculation, mice received another dose of IL2 (75,000 U) plus isotype control (BioXcell, catalog BE0096) or 7C6-hIgG1 mAbs (200 μg), as well as PBS or panobinostat (10 mg/kg; ApexBio, catalog number A8178). On day 2, mice were again reconstituted with human NK cells from the same donor and also received injections of IL2, antibodies, as well as PBS or panobinostat. Metastases in the lungs were quantified two weeks after the last treatment, as described above for the LLC1-MICA metastasis model (injection of Indian ink into the trachea, treatment of lung tissue with Fekete’s fixative).
NSG mice were inoculated with 1×106 ZsGreen+ A375 melanoma cells to study the effect of MICA/B mAb and panobinostat treatment on MICA/B surface expression in lung metastases. These mice did not receive human NK cells. When metastases were established (two weeks later), mice were treated on two subsequent days with 7C6-hIgG1 or isotype control mAbs (200 μg), as well as panobinostat (10 mg/kg) or PBS as a solvent control. One day following the last treatment, mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation, and lung tissue was dissociated mechanically as explained above but without the use of enzymes to preserve the integrity of MICA/B proteins. Tumor cells were identified as viable large cells that were ZsGreen+ but negative for the murine CD45 antigen. MICA/B surface protein was labeled with a 6D4-PE mAb (Biologend, catalog 320906) and quantified by flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter CytoFLEX LX) and analyzed by FlowJo v10.
Characterization of human NK cells in tumor-free NSG mice
Tumor-free NSG mice were inoculated intravenously with 2×106 human NK cells that were expanded in vitro as described above. At the same time, mice also received intraperitoneal injections of IL2 (7.5×104, Peprotech), as well as panobinostat (10 mg/kg) or PBS as the solvent control. One day later, blood was collected via retro-orbital bleeding, and human NK cells were analyzed by flow cytometry as described.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software, and the relevant statistical tests are indicated in each figure legend.
RESULTS
NK cell–mediated killing of human B2M-deficient melanoma cells is enhanced by MICA mAb
We examined whether a MICA/B α3 domain–specific antibody could enhance NK cell–mediated immunity against human B2M-deficient tumor cells. We inactivated the B2M gene in human A375 melanoma cells, which resulted in a complete loss of MHC-I surface proteins, even following stimulation with IFNγ (Fig. 1A, Supplementary Fig. S1A–B). B2M deficiency did not abolish MICA/B expression, although we noted a ~50% decrease of cell surface expression. Both B2M-KO and control A375 cell lines exhibited similar shedding of MICA into the supernatant (Fig. 1B). Treatment with a MICA/B α3 domain–specific mAb (7C6-hIgG1) inhibited MICA shedding and increased surface expression of MICA/B proteins for both control and B2M-deficient A375 cells (Fig. 1B–D).
NK cells express inhibitory receptors for MHC-I molecules (12), and we hypothesized that B2M-deficient tumor cells may be more sensitive to MICA/B mAb treatment. We studied the kinetics of NK cell–mediated killing of A375 cells using an imaging-based system that enabled counting of fluorescent tumor cells in 96-well plates at multiple timepoints (33). NK-cell MICA/B mAb treatment (7C6-hIgG1) was more effective against B2M-KO compared to control A375 melanoma cells. Even at a low effector-to-target ratio (1:1), only a small number of fluorescent B2M-KO melanoma cells remained at late timepoints (48–72 hours) in the presence of the MICA/B mAb (Fig. 1E). We previously established that the 7C6 mAb induces dual engagement of NKG2D and CD16a receptors in human NK cells and that both receptors contribute to NK cell–mediated killing of target cells (23). KIR2DL2, KIR2DL3, and KIR2DL4 are well-characterized inhibitory receptors for MHC-I molecules on human NK cells (12). Although NK cells from healthy donors are likely alloreactive to A375 cells due to MHC mismatch, antibody-mediated blockade of those receptors increased NK cell–mediated killing of 7C6-hIgG1-treated A375 cells (Supplementary Fig. S1C), which suggested that at least some of the NK-cell inhibitory receptors recognized MHC-I proteins on A375 cells. Altogether, these experiments demonstrated that loss of MHC class I surface expression rendered human tumor cells more vulnerable to NK cells, which was further enhanced by a MICA/B mAb.
MICA/B antibody induces immunity against metastases resistant to cytotoxic T cells
We used two murine models to investigate whether MICA/B mAb treatment could induce immunity against tumors with inactivating mutations in the MHC-I and IFNγ pathways (B2m and Jak1 mutations, respectively). IFNγ is secreted by both T cells and NK cells, and IFNγ signaling in tumor cells enhances expression of many genes of the MHC class I pathway and inhibits tumor cell proliferation (3). Therefore, Jak1 mutations could either negatively impact the ability of NK cells to control tumor cell growth or enhance NK-cell activation through loss of MHC class I proteins that engage inhibitory receptors on NK cells. B16F10 melanoma and LLC1 lung cancer cell lines were transduced to express human MICA, which binds to the murine NKG2D receptor (23). These murine models had differences in their pattern of MHC class I expression. B16F10 melanoma cells had low basal surface expression of H-2Kb and H-2Db proteins, but exposure to IFNγ increased H-2Kb and H-2Db surface proteins (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. S2A–B). We inactivated B2m or Jak1 genes in B16F10-MICA cells, which caused resistance to CD8+ T cell–mediated killing (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Figures S2–S3), and tested the efficacy of MICA/B mAb treatment in a lung metastasis model. Edited tumor cells were injected intravenously, and treatment was initiated on day 7 when established surface lung metastases were detected (Fig. 2B). B cell–deficient Ighm–/– mice were used as hosts to prevent development of endogenous antibodies against human MICA, as previously reported (23). Treatment with the MICA/B mAb (7C6-mIgG2a) inhibited the outgrowth of lung metastases by control, B2m-KO, and Jak1-KO B16F10-MICA cells (Fig. 2B). MICA/B mAb treatment also reduced MICA shedding detected in plasma (Supplementary Fig. S5A). We also analyzed the survival of wild-type (Ighm+/+) mice inoculated with B16F10-MICA cell lines and treated with MICA/B or control mAbs. Antibodies were administered on days 1 and 2 relative to B16F10-MICA inoculation, which was earlier than the generation of endogenous MICA antibodies by the murine immune system. 7C6 compared to isotype treatment increased survival of WT mice with control, B2m-KO, or Jak1-KO melanoma metastases (Fig. 2C).
We also examined the efficacy of MICA/B antibody treatment in the LLC1-MICA tumor model. LLC1 lung tumor cells had basal H-2Kb, but not H-2Db, expression. The surface H-2Kb expression was increased by IFNγ treatment (Fig. 3A). We knocked out the B2m gene in this cell line (Supplementary Figure S4B). Control LLC1 cells expressed H-2Kb at baseline and treatment with IFNγ increased MHC-I surface protein expression, whereas B2m-KO LLC1 cells had no MHC-I expression, even following IFNγ treatment (Fig. 3A). Tumor cells were injected intravenously into WT mice, and mAb treatment was initiated on day 2. MICA/B mAb treatment reduced the number of lung metastases formed by control LLC1-MICA tumor cells. Inactivation of the B2m gene reduced the number of lung metastases compared to control LLC1-MICA cells to almost undetectable levels. We therefore increased the number of inoculated tumor cells by 50%, which resulted in formation of lung metastases by B2m-KO LLC1-MICA cells. We observed a reduction in the number of B2m-KO LLC1-MICA metastases following treatment with 7C6-mIgG2a compared to the isotype (Fig. 3B).
NK-cell inhibitory receptors for MHC-I are encoded by polymorphic genes and have specificity for polymorphic variants of MHC-I proteins (35). C57BL/6 mice and Balb/c mice differ in their MHC-I polymorphic variants, and as consequence, the F1 generation from the cross between these two mouse strains (called CB6F1) has a population of NK cells that is not tolerant to the MHC-I variants from the C57BL/6 strain (36). Such alloreactive NK cells are key to the therapeutic efficacy of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for leukemia (37). The LLC1 cell line is syngeneic to C57BL/6 mice. Rag2–/–Il2rg–/– KO mice were reconstituted with either syngeneic NK cells (from C57BL/6 mice) or allogeneic NK cells (from CB6F1 mice). Both syngeneic and allogeneic NK cells significantly reduced the number of lung metastases formed by LLC1-MICA tumor cells when mice were treated with MICA/B versus isotype control mAb. Also, MICA/B antibody treatment was more effective when allogeneic NK cells were transferred (Fig. 3C). Altogether, the data were consistent with the hypothesis that engagement of MHC-I proteins by inhibitory receptors on NK cells reduces the antitumor immunity induced by the MICA/B mAb.
Essential role of NK cells for efficacy of the MICA/B antibody
We next performed mechanistic experiments with the B16F10-MICA cell line inoculated into WT mice. Depletion of NK cells, but not of CD8+ T cells, resulted in a complete loss of MICA/B mAb efficacy against both control and B2m-KO B16F10-MICA cells, whereas NK-cell depletion reduced MICA/B mAb efficacy against Jak1-KO B16F10-MICA cells (Fig. 4A). We also examined lung-infiltrating NK cells by flow cytometry, which were distinguished from blood NK cells by intravenous injection of anti-CD45.2 prior to euthanasia, as reported previously (23). MICA/B mAb treatment increased the degree of NK-cell infiltration into control or Jak1-KO B16F10-MICA tumors (Fig. 4B). In this analysis, NK-cell infiltration was normalized to tumor burden because the number of B16F10-MICA cells was substantially reduced in MICA/B mAb–treated mice (Fig. 4C–D). We did not observe significant differences in NKG2D and CD16 expression by tissue-infiltrating NK cells depending on the genotype of B16F10-MICA melanoma cells, except for an increase in CD16 for NK cells in the Jak1-KO B16F10-MICA lung metastasis model following treatment with 7C6-mIgG2a (Supplementary Figure S5). These data demonstrated that MICA/B mAb treatment inhibited the outgrowth of melanoma metastases in a NK cell–dependent manner, even when tumor cells carried inactivating mutations in B2m or Jak1 genes.
Combination therapy that enhances MICA/B protein levels on surface of tumors
In the tumor models described above, MICA transcription was controlled by a heterologous promoter (23). However, in human cancers, MICA/B expression is induced in response to DNA damage and cellular stress (13). The transcription of MICA and MICB genes is epigenetically regulated by HDACs, and HDAC inhibitors enhance transcription of these genes (27,28). The pan-HDAC inhibitor panobinostat has been FDA-approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (39) and an intact immune system is required for its therapeutic activity in experimental animal models (40). We therefore examined whether the combination of panobinostat and 7C6-hIgG1 could enhance MICA/B protein expression by increasing transcription of MICA/B genes (via panobinostat) and stabilization of the encoded protein on the cell surface (via the MICA/B mAb). RNA-seq analysis and qPCR analysis demonstrated that treatment of A375 cells with panobinostat for 24 hours increased mRNA of multiple genes encoding NKG2D ligands (Fig. 5A–B). As expected, panobinostat also affected transcription of many other genes in A375 melanoma cells, some of which represented immune-related pathways (Supplementary Figure S6). Surface MICA/B protein expression was increased by the combination of panobinostat and MICA/B mAb, and the concentration of shed MICA was diminished without a reduction in cellular viability (Fig. 5C–D). We also examined MICA/B protein expression by a panel of short-term human melanoma cell lines established from metastatic lesions (23,31). Treatment with panobinostat plus MICA/B mAb increased the surface density of MICA/B proteins compared to treatment with individual compounds (Fig. 5E, Supplementary Figure S7). These conclusions were further supported by analysis of a diverse panel of human tumor cell lines (Supplementary Fig. S8). However, MICB shedding could not be analyzed because the ELISA was specific for MICA (Supplementary Figure S9). These data demonstrated that combinatorial approaches which increase transcription of MICA/B genes and stabilize synthesized proteins increase surface MICA/B proteins on human cancer cells.
Efficacy of MICA/B mAb and panobinostat combination therapy in a humanized mouse model
We next investigated the in vivo activity of panobinostat on surface MICA/B protein expression on human melanoma cells. The selected dose of panobinostat (10 mg/kg) was based on previous research that established its efficacy for multiple myeloma in mouse models (41). We first established that the selected dose of panobinostat did not negatively impact human NK cells transferred to immunodeficient NSG mice (based on number of circulating total NK cells and percentage of CD16a+ or NKG2D+ NK cells; Supplementary Fig. S10A–C). Next, we injected ZsGreen+ A375 melanoma cells intravenously into NSG mice and waited for two weeks until metastases were established. Mice were then treated twice at a 24-hour interval with panobinostat (or PBS), MICA/B mAb (or isotype control mAb), or the combination of panobinostat plus MICA/B mAb (or panobinostat plus isotype control mAb). One day later, MICA/B surface protein was quantified on ZsGreen+ tumor cells from dissociated lung tissue by flow cytometry. The selected dose of panobinostat did not significantly increase MICA/B protein on melanoma cells as a monotherapy, but the combination of panobinostat and MICA/B mAb resulted in high MICA/B surface expression on ZsGreen+ A375 cells in pulmonary metastases (Fig. 6A, Supplementary Figure S10D).
Based on our prior experience, survival of transferred human NK cells is limited in NSG mice, and only a small number of human NK cells infiltrate lung tissue (23). We therefore initiated treatment one day following inoculation of A375 cells (Fig. 6B). The early start of treatment likely enabled NK-cell recognition of tumor cells that had not yet infiltrated deeply into the lungs. We found that only the combination of panobinostat plus MICA/B mAb reduced the number of lung metastases formed by control (B2M-WT) A375 cells, whereas monotherapy with either panobinostat or MICA/B mAb was ineffective. In contrast, monotherapy with the MICA/B mAb reduced the number of lung metastases formed by B2M-KO A375 cells (Fig. 6C). The combination of MICA/B mAb and panobinostat did not enhance this effect against B2M-KO metastases, potentially because NK-cell reconstitution was limited in this model. These results demonstrated that MICA/B mAb treatment was more effective against MHC-I–deficient melanoma metastases in this humanized mouse model, whereas only the combination therapy was effective against melanoma metastases that expressed MHC-I proteins.
DISCUSSION
Primary and secondary resistance to checkpoint blockade are major issues in oncology. Many mechanisms of resistance to checkpoint blockade are related to the MHC-I and IFNγ signaling pathways in tumor cells. These include mutations of B2M or other genes in the MHC-I antigen presentation pathway, epigenetic silencing of neoantigen or MHC-I expression, and inactivating mutations in the IFNγ signaling pathway (4–6). Although MICA/B proteins have a similar overall structure to MHC-I proteins, they do not assemble with β2-microglobulin (24). Also, transcription of the MICA/B genes is induced by DNA damage and cellular stress rather than by IFNγ (13). Therefore, inactivating mutations in the MHC-I and IFNγ pathway do not abrogate MICA/B expression.
It is well known that loss of MHC-I expression removes an important inhibitory signal for NK cells, but sufficient activating signals are required for induction of NK cell–mediated tumor immunity (12). We showed that metastases with inactivating mutations in the MHC-I (B2M mutation) or IFNγ signaling (JAK1 mutation) pathways can be treated with a MICA/B α3 domain–specific antibody. This antibody inhibited proteolytic shedding of MICA/B, a common evasion mechanism from NKG2D receptor–mediated immunity in human cancers. We previously showed that treatment with this mAb induces activation of both NKG2D (increased density of MICA/B ligand) and CD16a (Fc region of mAb) receptors on NK cells and that tumor immunity elicited by this mAb is NK cell–dependent (23). The NKG2D receptor is also expressed by human CD8+ T cells, γδ T cells, and ILCs (14,42,43,44). MICA/B mAb treatment therefore also has the potential to enhance T cell–mediated tumor immunity via the NKG2D receptor expressed by CD8+ T cells, although this hypothesis will need to be further investigated. Shedding of some NKG2D ligands does not result in immune escape. For example, the shedding of MULT-1, a murine NKG2D ligand, promotes the NK cell–mediated immunity (45). How shedding of NKG2D ligands other than MICA/B potentially affects NKG2D-mediated immunity in the context of MICA/B mAb treatment remains to be investigated.
Many therapeutic approaches used in oncology enhance expression of MICA/B proteins by tumor cells. However, proteolytic shedding of MICA/B proteins by tumor cells limits the effect of such drugs on NKG2D receptor activation. We showed that the combination of panobinostat and a MICA/B α3 domain antibody increased MICA/B surface protein expression on tumor cells in vivo and enhanced NK cell–mediated immunity against melanoma metastases. The HDAC inhibitor may also induce expression of NKG2D ligands in healthy tissues, but this aspect could not be evaluated in our study because mice do not have MICA/B genes. We acknowledge that this humanized model has significant limitations, especially with respect to limited survival of transferred human NK cells due to lack of homeostatic cytokine signaling. A similar conceptual approach could be used to develop combination therapies with other FDA-approved drugs. Also, it is known that the DNA damage response induced by radiation therapy enhances MICA/B transcription (46). A combination of local radiotherapy and systemic immunotherapy with a MICA/B mAb could be used to limit immune-related adverse events observed with combinations involving two systemic immunotherapy agents (such as PD-1 and CTLA-4 mAbs). A clinical trial has already shown that radiation therapy in combination with CTLA-4 blockade can induce abscopal effects (47).
In summary, we showed that metastases with mutations that cause resistance to cytotoxic T cells can be targeted by NK cells when MICA/B shedding is inhibited with a mAb. Two conceptual approaches could be envisioned for eliciting NK cell–mediated tumor immunity with such an antibody. First, a MICA/B α3 domain–specific mAb could be used to treat tumors resistant to checkpoint blockade due to inactivating mutations in the MHC-I or IFNγ signaling pathways. Second, simultaneous administration of an anti-MICA/B and anti–PD-1 could activate both NK cells and CD8+ T cells, thereby preventing the outgrowth of tumor clones resistant to cytotoxic T cells. Induction of NK cell–mediated immunity may thus provide a strategy to treat tumors with escape mutations from T cell–mediated cytotoxicity.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Hye-Jung Kim, Sandrine Degryse, and Stephanie Dougan for providing some of the mouse lines, as well as Irene Ghobrial and Mahshid Rahmat for providing multiple myeloma cell lines.
Funding: This work was supported by a grant from NIH (NCI R01 CA238039 to K.W.W.), a Translational Research Grant from the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (to K.W.W.) and a sponsored research agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). L.F.A. was supported by a Friends for Life Neuroblastoma Fellowship, SK was supported by an AACR-AstraZeneca fellowship, D.P. by a Cancer Research Institute/Robertson Foundation Fellowship and A.M.L. was supported by a Cancer Immunology Training Grant (T32 CA207021).
REFERENCES
- 1.Ribas A, Wolchok JD, Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science 359, 1350–1355 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schumacher TN, Schreiber RD, Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science 348, 69–74 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Parker BS, Rautela J, Hertzog PJ, Antitumour actions of interferons: implications for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 16, 131–144 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gao J et al. , Loss of IFN-γ pathway genes in tumor cells as a mechanism of resistance to anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Cell 167, 397–404 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zaretsky JM et al. , Mutations Associated with Acquired Resistance to PD-1 Blockade in Melanoma. N Engl J Med 375, 819–829 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pitt JM et al. , Resistance Mechanisms to Immune-Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer: Tumor-Intrinsic and -Extrinsic Factors. Immunity 44, 1255–1269 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Snyder A et al. , Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med 371, 2189–2199 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rizvi NA et al. , Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science 348, 124–128 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hellmann MD et al. , Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a High Tumor Mutational Burden. N Engl J Med 378, 2093–2104 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hellmann MD et al. , Tumor Mutational Burden and Efficacy of Nivolumab Monotherapy and in Combination with Ipilimumab in Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Cell 33, 853–861 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.June CH, O’Connor RS, Kawalekar OU, Ghassemi S, Milone MC, CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science 359, 1361–1365 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Long EO, Kim HS, Liu D, Peterson ME, Rajagopalan S, Controlling natural killer cell responses: integration of signals for activation and inhibition. Annu Rev Immunol 31, 227–258 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Raulet DH, Gasser S, Gowen BG, Deng W, Jung H, Regulation of ligands for the NKG2D activating receptor. Annu Rev Immunol 31, 413–441 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bauer S et al. , Activation of NK cells and T cells by NKG2D, a receptor for stress-inducible MICA. Science 285, 727–729 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Salih HR, Rammensee HG, Steinle A, Cutting edge: down-regulation of MICA on human tumors by proteolytic shedding. J Immunol 169, 4098–4102 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kaiser BK et al. , Disulphide-isomerase-enabled shedding of tumour-associated NKG2D ligands. Nature 447, 482–486 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jinushi M et al. , MHC class I chain-related protein A antibodies and shedding are associated with the progression of multiple myeloma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 1285–1290 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang FQ et al. , Matrix metallopeptidase 2 (MMP2) mediates MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A (MICA) shedding in renal cell carcinoma. Actas Urol Esp 38, 172–178 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Boutet P et al. , Cutting edge: the metalloproteinase ADAM17/TNF-alpha-converting enzyme regulates proteolytic shedding of the MHC class I-related chain B protein. J Immunol 182, 49–53 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Groh V, Wu J, Yee C, Spies T, Tumour-derived soluble MIC ligands impair expression of NKG2D and T-cell activation. Nature 419, 734–738 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Waldhauer I et al. , Tumor-associated MICA is shed by ADAM proteases. Cancer Res 68, 6368–6376 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Salih HR, Goehlsdorf D, Steinle A, Release of MICB molecules by tumor cells: mechanism and soluble MICB in sera of cancer patients. Hum Immunol 67, 188–195 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Andrade LF et al. , Antibody-mediated inhibition of MICA and MICB shedding promotes NK cell–driven tumor immunity. Science 359, 1537–1542 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li P et al. , Complex structure of the activating immunoreceptor NKG2D and its MHC class I-like ligand MICA. Nat Immunol 2, 443–451 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bahram S, Bresnahan M, Geraghty DE, Spies T, A second lineage of mammalian major histocompatibility complex class I genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 6259–6263 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Groh V et al. , Cell stress-regulated human major histocompatibility complex class I gene expressed in gastrointestinal epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 12445–12450 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Armeanu S et al. , Natural killer cell-mediated lysis of hepatoma cells via specific induction of NKG2D ligands by the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium valproate. Cancer Res 65, 6321–6329 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Skov S et al. , Cancer cells become susceptible to natural killer cell killing after exposure to histone deacetylase inhibitors due to glycogen synthase kinase-3-dependent expression of MHC class I-related chain A and B. Cancer Res 65, 11136–11145 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang C, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Tian Z, Sodium butyrate upregulates expression of NKG2D ligand MICA/B in HeLa and HepG2 cell lines and increases their susceptibility to NK lysis. Cancer Immunol Immunother 58, 1275–1285 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Diermayr S et al. , NKG2D ligand expression in AML increases in response to HDAC inhibitor valproic acid and contributes to allorecognition by NK-cell lines with single KIR-HLA class I specificities. Blood 111, 1428–1436 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Izar B et al. , Bidirectional cross talk between patient-derived melanoma and cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes invasion and proliferation. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research 29, 656–668 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pan D et al. , A major chromatin regulator determines resistance of tumor cells to T cell-mediated killing. Science 359, 770–775 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chan LL, Wucherpfennig KW, de Andrade LF, Visualization and quantification of NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity over extended time periods by image cytometry. J Immunol Methods 469, 47–51 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ferrari de Andrade L et al. , Natural killer cells are essential for the ability of BRAF inhibitors to control BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic melanoma. Cancer Res 74, 7298–7308 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim S et al. , Licensing of natural killer cells by host major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. Nature 436, 709–713 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yu YY et al. , The role of Ly49A and 5E6(Ly49C) molecules in hybrid resistance mediated by murine natural killer cells against normal T cell blasts. Immunity 4, 67–76 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ruggeri L et al. , Effectiveness of donor natural killer cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants. Science 295, 2097–2100 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang X et al. , A herpesvirus encoded Qa-1 mimic inhibits natural killer cell cytotoxicity through CD94/NKG2A receptor engagement. Elife 7, e38667 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Laubach JP, Moreau P, San-Miguel JF, Richardson PG, Panobinostat for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 21, 4767–4773 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.West AC et al. , An Intact Immune System Is Required for the Anticancer Activities of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors. Cancer Res 73, 7265–7276 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Growney JD et al. Blood 110, 1510–1510 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Groh V, Steinle A, Bauer S, Spies T, Recognition of stress-induced MHC molecules by intestinal epithelial gammadelta T cells. Science 279, 1737–1740 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chiossone L, Dumas P-Y, Vienne M, Vivier E, Natural killer cells and other innate lymphoid cells in cancer. Nature reviews Immunology 18, 671–688 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Klose CSN et al. , Differentiation of type 1 ILCs from a common progenitor to all helper-like innate lymphoid cell lineages. Cell 157, 340–356 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Deng W et al. , A shed NKG2D ligand that promotes natural killer cell activation and tumor rejection. Science 348, 136–139 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dhar P, Wu JD, NKG2D and its ligands in cancer. Curr Opin Immunol 51, 55–61 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Formenti SC et al. , Radiotherapy induces responses of lung cancer to CTLA-4 blockade. Nat Med 24, 1845–1851 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Romee R et al. , First-in-human phase 1 clinical study of the IL-15 superagonist complex ALT-803 to treat relapse after transplantation. Blood 131, 2515–2527 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.André P et al. , Anti-NKG2A mAb is a checkpoint inhibitor that promotes anti-tumor immunity by unleashing both T and NK cells. Cell 175, 1731–1743 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.