Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2020 May 1;13(5):1190–1196.

Chance to rein in a cancer--Spontaneous regression of lung carcinoma (1988-2018): a 30-year perspective

Jingyao Zhang 1, Haijuan Wang 1, Chunxiao Li 1, Haili Qian 1
PMCID: PMC7270659  PMID: 32509094

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous regression of tumor is an extremely rare phenomenon in the oncology field and even rarer for lung cancer. However, the underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Summarizing the available clinical information and the supposed mechanism shed new light on lung cancer therapy strategies in the new era of immunotherapy. Summary: We conducted a PubMed search using the retrieval tactics (“Lung Neoplasms” [Mesh]) AND “Neoplasm Regression, Spontaneous” [Mesh] for reports from 1988 to January 2018, and all references in the relevant literature were subsequently investigated for relevance. Using the criteria of Everson and Cole, 14 cases were finally defined as spontaneous regression and were reviewed in the research. Key messages: The information regarding patient characteristics, treatments, and follow-up has been summarized. In this review, we found that spontaneous lung cancer regression cases fall into two categories including: (1) neurologic disorders in 6 cases, half of whom suffered with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) and (2) immunological reactions in 7 cases. Getting data on more spontaneous regression cases and more detailed information will definitely help us understand the mechanism for the body’s surveillance system-cancer balance, creating a big chance to increase cancer immunotherapy.

Keywords: Spontaneous regression, lung carcinoma, paraneoplastic neurological syndrome, immunological reaction

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the most fatal cancer types and the leading cause of cancer death among males [1]. Among females, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in more developed countries, and the second cause of cancer death in less developed countries [2]. In 2015, more than 3 million cases of lung cancer and 1.7 million lung cancer-related deaths were documented across the globe [3]. For advanced local or metastatic disease, the five-year survival rate following diagnosis is roughly as low as 16% [4]. Almost all of the cancer patients will develop into later stages if no interference is applied; however there are indeed rare instances of lung cancer regressing spontaneously.

Spontaneous tumor regression is a phenomenon that has been observed for hundreds of years. Although mechanisms about spontaneous regression have been assumed, they are still behind the veil. Spontaneous regression was defined as the complete or partial disappearance of a malignant tumor in the absence of treatment or in the presence of therapy considered inadequate to exert a significant influence on the disease by Everson and Cole in the 1960s [5,6]. It is defined as partial or complete disappearance of a malignant tumor in patients’ tissue that can be illustrated by pathologic examination. However, to qualify as spontaneous regression, this phenomenon must occur in the absence of any medical treatment [7], leaving a very limited numbernof cases to track possible mechanisms. In this paper, the mechanism of spontaneous regression is discussed using recent references.

Spontaneous tumor regression occurs in approximately one in every 140,000 cases of cancer [8]. Regression is more commonly associated with tumor types like kidney cancer, chorion epithelioma, neuroblastoma, and malignant melanoma [9]. In recent years, there have been some reviews of spontaneous regression of melanoma [10], thoracic malignancies [11], Merkel cell carcinoma [12], and hepatocellular carcinoma [13]. However, there are rare reports of spontaneous regression of lung cancer. Here, we have comprehensively reviewed 14 cases of spontaneously regressed lung cancer published from 1988 to 2018, containing small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and an overview of possible mechanisms of regression is portrayed.

Methods

We conducted a PubMed search using the retrieval tactics (“Lung Neoplasms” [Mesh]) AND “Neoplasm Regression, Spontaneous” [Mesh] reported from 1988 to January 2018, and all references in theliterature were subsequently investigated for relevance. We included only those articles that contained true spontaneous regression of lung cancer matching the Everson and Cole criterion that is defined as: 1) patients did not receiving any systemic therapy (chemotherapy, radioablative techniques, chemoembolization, surgery), 2) primary malignancy was pathologically diagnosed, 3) complete or partial disappearance of lung cancer in patients’ tissue that can be illustrated by pathologic examination. 14 cases were found in the research shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of lung carcinomas spontaneous regression

Ref. Age Sex Metastasis Regression TNM Pathologic examination Pathologic diagnosis Associated treatments or health conditions Follow-up (month)
1 Cafferata, MA [14] 68 M None Complete regression Stage I CT-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy Poorly differentiated pulmonary adenocarcinoma Unknown 48
2 Pujol, JL [34] 75 F N/A Complete regression N/A Fine-needle transbronchial biopsy Non-small cell lung cancer Anti-Hu Antibody Syndrome 18
3 Gladwish, A [35] 81 F Lymph node metastases Partial regression T2N3M0 Ultrasound-guided biopsy Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma Essiac tea 18
4 Menon, MP [26] 44 M Brain and adrenal gl and metastases Partial regression N/A Biopsies of both the adrenal gland and lung Poorly differentiated non-small-cell carcinoma HAART (AIDS) 60
5 Lee, YS [20] 70 F N/A Complete regression N/A Bronchoscopy biopsy Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) Lower respiratory tract infection (fever and cough with yellowish sputum) 132
6 Choi, SM [24] 71 M N/A Complete regression N/A Bronchoscopy biopsy Squamous cell carcinoma Pulmonary tuberculosis 10
7 Nakamura, Y [29] 71 M None Complete regression cT4N0M0 Thoracoscopy Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma Anti-NY-ESO-1 immunity 5
8 Mawhinney, E [36] N/A F N/A Complete regression N/A Bronchoscopy Atypical cells suggestive of SCLC Ataxic sensorimotor neuropathy with mild weakness (intravenous immunoglobulin and intravenous methylprednisolone and subsequent oral corticosteroid) 18 DEATH for Neurologic disorder
9 Asada, M [37] 88 M N/A Complete regression N/A Sputum cytology Squamous cell carcinoma Tiapride for the treatment of senile mental illness 4
10 Haruki, T [31] 69 F Partial regression cT1N2M1 CT-guided needle biopsy Lung adenocarcinoma Immunological CD8+ T cell 14
11 Darnell, RB [38] 60 M N/A Complete regression N/A Biopsy specimen Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) Paraneoplastic neuronal antibodies 72
12 Darnell, RB [38] 71 M None Complete regression N/A N/A N/A Hu-antibody positive 12 and Death for Her neurological state progressively deteriorated
13 Nakano, T [25] 50 F Lymph node metastases Complete regression N/A Bronchoscopy examination Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) hepatitis B cell strain 72 months and died for hepatocellular carcinoma
14 Sperduto, P [39] 61 M Adrenal metastasis Complete regression N/A Needle aspiration Squamous cell carcinoma auditory hallucinations (treated with amitriptyline and perphenazine) 24

Epidemiology

Observations regarding the epidemiology of spontaneous lung cancer regression have been reported since 1988. The review of 14 patients showed that the median age of the patients with spontaneous regression was 67.6 years (range: 44-88 years). Of the 14 patients, 64.3% (9/14) were male and the average follow-up time lasted for 36 months (from 4 to 72 months). Among these cases (Table 1), four patients had confirmed tumor metastasis including lymph node metastases, brain metastasis, and adrenal metastasis, but there were still two patients with complete spontaneous regression of lung cancer.

Discussion

The patients vary in terms of age, associated treatments, and clinical courses. The mechanism of spontaneous lung cancer regression is obscure. By this review, though with a limited number of cases, we observed that spontaneous lung cancer regression occurred mainly under two physiologic circumstances (Table 2): (1) with neurologic disorders; and (2) with abnormal immunological reactions (Table 2). There were neurological disorders in 6 patients and systemic immunological abnormalities in 7 patients. In one patient, no obvious physiologic events were found accompanied by tumor regression [14]. As previously reported, tumor regression may be an immune-mediated event especially through inhibiting tumor growth. Interestingly, among the patients suffering with neurologic disorders, there were 3 patients with positive paraneoplastic neuronal antibodies. Various specific neuronal antibodies that are found in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) patients suggests that PNSs are the consequences of cancers mediated by immune responses against the tumor [15], and characterized by poor overall outcome [16].

Table 2.

Possible reasons for lung carcinomas’ spontaneous regression

Neurologic disorder Immunological reaction
Paraneoplastic neuronal antibodies [34,38] Essiac tea [35]
Ataxic sensorimotor neuropathy [36] HAART (AIDS) [26]
Senile mental illness [37] Lower respiratory tract infection (fever and cough with yellowish sputum) [20]
Auditory hallucinations [39] Pulmonary tuberculosis [24]
Anti-NY-ESO-1 immunity [29]
Massive infiltration of CD8+ lymphocytes [31]
Hepatitis B virus [25]

The pathogenesis of the paraneoplastic syndrome in the nervous system is caused by the tumor cells’ expressing the neural system antigens which cross-immunize with the nervous tissues, leading to neural system dysfunction. To cope with the developing cancer, the patient produces a tumor-targeting antibody, the onconeural antibody [17]. Due to antigenic similarity, these onconeural antibodies and related onconeural antigen-specific T lymphocytes inadvertently attack components of the nervous system, stimulating a range of immune responses leading to immune-mediated neural syndrome [17,18]. The association of paraneoplastic syndrome with spontaneous tumor regression strongly suggests that anti-tumor immune-mediated responses are a potential mechanism for the regression. PNS may promote an anti-tumor immune response by affecting autoimmunity in lung carcinoma. Meanwhile, the presence of the Hu antibody at diagnosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a strong and independent predictor of a complete response to treatment, and even a low titer can be used as a predictor of tumor response to treatment and longer survival [19]. It is speculated that tumor expressing Hu antigen can enhance anti-tumor immunity and increase chemosensitivity [20]. However, there are also reports that the presence of Hu-Ab is not associated with the prognosis of SCLC, but may reflect unknown cellular immune responses, induce nervous system syndrome, and improve tumor outcome [21]. Thus, it seems that the real relationship between PNS, Hu-antibody and spontaneous regression of lung cancer still needs to be clarified by further evidence.

Cancer regression is long known but underinvestigated because of its rare incidence. Notably, the regression of cancers often occurs simultaneously with infections including hepatitis, influenza, tuberculosis, and others [22,23]. In the 3 cases with spontaneous regression of lung cancer from 1988-2018, we found that the possible reasons for the regression in lung cancer are lower respiratory tract infection [20], pulmonary tuberculosis [24], and hepatitis B virus [25] (Table 2). Meanwhile, Menon et al. [26] reported that possible factors connected with tumor regression include antiretroviral treatment and immune recovery through highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) [26,27]. A report showed that early remission of cervical intraepithelial lesions appeared in HIV patients after antiretroviral therapy [28]. These suggest that immune recovery from an impaired condition may cause spontaneous regression of tumors. There is now increasing evidence that congenital and adaptive immune cells interact in the lung tumor microenvironment, and the structural and functional association between local immunity and the components of the tumor microenvironment can affect prognosis. The mechanisms of immunologic reactions produce a stronger than normal response resulting in recovery of lung cancer (Table 2), the stimulus of which may be infection caused by tuberculosis [24], viruses [25,26,29] or any other events that influence the lung [30] and make lung cancer unable to escape the immune response. Also, massive infiltration of CD8+ lymphocytes [31] are associated with a better prognosis compared to cases without CD8+ infiltration in lung cancer patients [32].

Growing evidence points to an immune imbalance for cancer development and progression. From this mini review, it seems immune factors are the cause for spontaneous cancer regression. In certain physical conditions, cancer patients are able to survive for a long period with stable cancer. For cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), spontaneous regression occurs more frequently and there is a greater chance for regression before irreversible cancer develops [33]. Therefore, it is very interesting and important to explore the mechanisms orchestrating tumor spontaneous regression. Here, by “spontaneous”, it only means the cancers regress without receiving traditional treatment procedures like surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and there must be some internal or external factors that switch off the tumor progression. Spontaneous regression can involve two different processes, including to reverse the precancerous lesions or to shrink the existing tumors, at least achieving patients’ long-term survival with a stable cancer, while saving aggressive chemotherapy or radiotherapy procedures. In an era of immunotherapy development, it is even more important to figure out the decisive power behind the cancer immune system. The real factors curbing tumor development and initiating tumor regression remain unknown, and even the factors predicting immunotherapy efficacy still are in an immature stage. This review about lung cancer spontaneous regression sheds light on the task to fight cancer. A major limitation of this study is its retrospective design, but a prospective analysis for spontaneous regression of lung malignancies is impossible, as they are so rare. The mechanism of this event is still a mystery. The two major physical abnormalities connected to lung cancer spontaneous regression should be further investigated in every detail.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81572842, 81872280, 81672459), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2015CB553904), the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (No. 2016-I2M-1-001, 2017-I2M-3-004, 2019-I2M-1-003), the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2017PT31029), the Independent Issue of State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology (No. SKL-2017-16), the Open Issue of State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology (No. SKL-KF-2017-16).

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, Brenner H, Dicker DJ, Chimed-Orchir O, Dandona R, Dandona L, Fleming T, Forouzanfar MH, Hancock J, Hay RJ, Hunter-Merrill R, Huynh C, Hosgood HD, Johnson CO, Jonas JB, Khubchandani J, Kumar GA, Kutz M, Lan Q, Larson HJ, Liang X, Lim SS, Lopez AD, MacIntyre MF, Marczak L, Marquez N, Mokdad AH, Pinho C, Pourmalek F, Salomon JA, Sanabria JR, Sandar L, Sartorius B, Schwartz SM, Shackelford KA, Shibuya K, Stanaway J, Steiner C, Sun J, Takahashi K, Vollset SE, Vos T, Wagner JA, Wang H, Westerman R, Zeeb H, Zoeckler L, Abd-Allah F, Ahmed MB, Alabed S, Alam NK, Aldhahri SF, Alem G, Alemayohu MA, Ali R, Al-Raddadi R, Amare A, Amoako Y, Artaman A, Asayesh H, Atnafu N, Awasthi A, Saleem HB, Barac A, Bedi N, Bensenor I, Berhane A, Bernabé E, Betsu B, Binagwaho A, Boneya D, Campos-Nonato I, Castañeda-Orjuela C, Catalá-López F, Chiang P, Chibueze C, Chitheer A, Choi JY, Cowie B, Damtew S, das Neves J, Dey S, Dharmaratne S, Dhillon P, Ding E, Driscoll T, Ekwueme D, Endries AY, Farvid M, Farzadfar F, Fernandes J, Fischer F, G/Hiwot TT, Gebru A, Gopalani S, Hailu A, Horino M, Horita N, Husseini A, Huybrechts I, Inoue M, Islami F, Jakovljevic M, James S, Javanbakht M, Jee SH, Kasaeian A, Kedir MS, Khader YS, Khang YH, Kim D, Leigh J, Linn S, Lunevicius R, El Razek HMA, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Marcenes W, Markos D, Melaku YA, Meles KG, Mendoza W, Mengiste DT, Meretoja TJ, Miller TR, Mohammad KA, Mohammadi A, Mohammed S, Moradi-Lakeh M, Nagel G, Nand D, Le Nguyen Q, Nolte S, Ogbo FA, Oladimeji KE, Oren E, Pa M, Park EK, Pereira DM, Plass D, Qorbani M, Radfar A, Rafay A, Rahman M, Rana SM, Søreide K, Satpathy M, Sawhney M, Sepanlou SG, Shaikh MA, She J, Shiue I, Shore HR, Shrime MG, So S, Soneji S, Stathopoulou V, Stroumpoulis K, Sufiyan MB, Sykes BL, Tabarés-Seisdedos R, Tadese F, Tedla BA, Tessema GA, Thakur JS, Tran BX, Ukwaja KN, Uzochukwu BSC, Vlassov VV, Weiderpass E, Wubshet Terefe M, Yebyo HG, Yimam HH, Yonemoto N, Younis MZ, Yu C, Zaidi Z, Zaki MES, Zenebe ZM, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:524–548. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Valente IR, Cortez PC, Neto EC, Soares JM, de Albuquerque VH, Tavares JM. Automatic 3D pulmonary nodule detection in CT images: a survey. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;124:91–107. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Everson TC. Spontaneous regression of cancer. Prog Clin Cancer. 1967;3:79–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cole WH. Spontaneous regression of cancer: the metabolic triumph of the host? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974;230:111–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb14441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kucerova P, Cervinkova M. Spontaneous regression of tumour and the role of microbial infection--possibilities for cancer treatment. Anticancer Drugs. 2016;27:269–277. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chang WY. Complete spontaneous regression of cancer: four case reports, review of literature, and discussion of possible mechanisms involved. Hawaii Med J. 2000;59:379–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brodeur GM. Spontaneous regression of neuroblastoma. Cell Tissue Res. 2018;372:277–286. doi: 10.1007/s00441-017-2761-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kalialis LV, Drzewiecki KT, Klyver H. Spontaneous regression of metastases from melanoma: review of the literature. Melanoma Res. 2009;19:275–282. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e32832eabd5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kumar T, Patel N, Talwar A. Spontaneous regression of thoracic malignancies. Respir Med. 2010;104:1543–1550. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Walsh NM. Complete spontaneous regression of Merkel cell carcinoma (1986-2016): a 30 year perspective. J Cutan Pathol. 2016;43:1150–1154. doi: 10.1111/cup.12812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sakamaki A, Kamimura K, Abe S, Tsuchiya A, Takamura M, Kawai H, Yamagiwa S, Terai S. Spontaneous regression of hepatocellular carcinoma: a mini-review. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:3797–3804. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i21.3797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cafferata MA, Chiaramondia M, Monetti F, Ardizzoni A. Complete spontaneous remission of non-small-cell lung cancer: a case report. Lung Cancer. 2004;45:263–266. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leypoldt F, Wandinger KP. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;175:336–348. doi: 10.1111/cei.12185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Berzero G, Karantoni E, Dehais C, Ducray F, Thomas L, Picard G, Rogemond V, Candelier G, Camdessanche JP, Antoine JC, De Seze J, Liou-Schischmanoff A, Honnorat J, Delattre JY, Psimaras D. Early intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes with onconeural antibodies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89:789–792. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kanaji N, Watanabe N, Kita N, Bandoh S, Tadokoro A, Ishii T, Dobashi H, Matsunaga T. Paraneoplastic syndromes associated with lung cancer. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5:197–223. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pelosof LC, Gerber DE. Paraneoplastic syndromes: an approach to diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:838–854. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Graus F, Dalmou J, Rene R, Tora M, Malats N, Verschuuren JJ, Cardenal F, Vinolas N, Garcia del Muro J, Vadell C, Mason WP, Rosell R, Posner JB, Real FX. Anti-Hu antibodies in patients with small-cell lung cancer: association with complete response to therapy and improved survival. J. Clin. Oncol. 1997;15:2866–2872. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.8.2866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee YS, Kang HM, Jang PS, Jung SS, Kim JM, Kim JO, Kim SY. Spontaneous regression of small cell lung cancer. Respirology. 2008;13:615–618. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01294.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Monstad SE, Drivsholm L, Storstein A, Aarseth JH, Haugen M, Lang B, Vincent A, Vedeler CA. Hu and voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) antibodies related to the prognosis of small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004;22:795–800. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hoption Cann SA, van Netten JP, van Netten C. Acute infections as a means of cancer prevention: opposing effects to chronic infections? Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30:83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hoption Cann SA, van Netten JP, van Netten C, Glover DW. Spontaneous regression: a hidden treasure buried in time. Med Hypotheses. 2002;58:115–119. doi: 10.1054/mehy.2001.1469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Choi SM, Go H, Chung DH, Yim JJ. Spontaneous regression of squamous cell lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:e5–6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1417IM. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nakano T, Tamura S, Higashino K. Hepatocellular carcinoma after spontaneous regression of extensive small cell lung cancer. Am J Med. 1988;84:178–179. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90036-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Menon MP, Eaton KD. Spontaneous regression of non-small-cell lung cancer in AIDS after immune reconstitution. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:e1–2. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Holkar S, Mudhar HS, Jain A, Gupta M, Rogstad KE, Parsons MA, Singh AD, Rennie IG. Regression of invasive conjunctival squamous carcinoma in an HIV-positive patient on antiretroviral therapy. Int J STD AIDS. 2005;16:782–783. doi: 10.1258/095646205774988028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Heard I, Schmitz V, Costagliola D, Orth G, Kazatchkine MD. Early regression of cervical lesions in HIV-seropositive women receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 1998;12:1459–1464. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199812000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nakamura Y, Noguchi Y, Satoh E, Uenaka A, Sato S, Kitazaki T, Kanda T, Soda H, Nakayama E, Kohno S. Spontaneous remission of a non-small cell lung cancer possibly caused by anti-NY-ESO-1 immunity. Lung Cancer. 2009;65:119–122. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lai DM, Shu Q, Fan J. The origin and role of innate lymphoid cells in the lung. Mil Med Res. 2016;3:25. doi: 10.1186/s40779-016-0093-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Haruki T, Nakamura H, Taniguchi Y, Miwa K, Adachi Y, Fujioka S, Shomori K, Ito H. Spontaneous regression of lung adenocarcinoma: report of a case. Surg Today. 2010;40:1155–1158. doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-4195-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Steele KE, Tan TH, Korn R, Dacosta K, Brown C, Kuziora M, Zimmermann J, Laffin B, Widmaier M, Rognoni L, Cardenes R, Schneider K, Boutrin A, Martin P, Zha J, Wiestler T. Measuring multiple parameters of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in human cancers by image analysis. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6:20. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0326-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tainio K, Athanasiou A, Tikkinen KAO, Aaltonen R, Cardenas J, Hernandes , Glazer-Livson S, Jakobsson M, Joronen K, Kiviharju M, Louvanto K, Oksjoki S, Tahtinen R, Virtanen S, Nieminen P, Kyrgiou M, Kalliala I. Clinical course of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 under active surveillance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018;360:k499. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pujol JL, Godard AL, Jacot W, Labauge P. Spontaneous complete remission of a non-small cell lung cancer associated with anti-Hu antibody syndrome. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:168–170. doi: 10.1097/jto.0b013e31802f1c9d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gladwish A, Clarke K, Bezjak A. Spontaneous regression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. BMJ Case Rep. 2010;2010:bcr0720103147. doi: 10.1136/bcr.07.2010.3147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mawhinney E, Gray OM, McVerry F, McDonnell GV. Paraneoplastic sensorimotor neuropathy associated with regression of small cell lung carcinoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2010;2010:bcr0120091486. doi: 10.1136/bcr.01.2009.1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Asada M, Ebihara S, Okazaki T, Takahashi H, Yasuda H, Sasaki H. Tiapride may accelerate lung cancer in older people: a case report. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:731–732. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53228_4.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Darnell RB, DeAngelis LM. Regression of small-cell lung carcinoma in patients with paraneoplastic neuronal antibodies. Lancet. 1993;341:21–22. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92485-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sperduto P, Vaezy A, Bridgman A, Wilkie L. Spontaneous regression of squamous cell lung carcinoma with adrenal metastasis. Chest. 1988;94:887–889. doi: 10.1378/chest.94.4.887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES