Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jun 3;10:9031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66077-8

High-purity recycling of hematite and Zn/Cu mixture from waste smelting slag

Yang Huo 1, Xiang Song 1, Suiyi Zhu 1,✉, Yu Chen 1,2, Xue Lin 1, Yaqiong Wu 1, Zhan Qu 1, Ting Su 1, Xinfeng Xie 1,3
PMCID: PMC7271127  PMID: 32494002

Abstract

In this study, Zn/Cu-bearing smelting slag was recycled via an integrated acid dissolution and hematite precipitation method. The slag was dissolved in nitric acid to generate an acid solution containing 23.5 g/L Fe, 4.45 g/L Zn and 2.81 g/L Cu, which was subjected to hydrothermal treatment with the addition of levulinic acid (LA). More than 99.95% of the initial Fe content was removed as hematite particles with diameters of approximately 200 nm, and the residual Fe concentration in the acid was 0.43 mg/L. The generated hematite contained 97.3% Fe2O3, 0.64% ZnO and 0.58% CuO. Greater than 99% of the initial Zn and Cu was retained in the acid and further precipitated as Zn/Cu-bearing solids by adjusting the solution pH to 9. The precipitated Zn/Cu-bearing solids contained 33.6% Zn and 21.7% Cu, whereas the Fe content was less than 0.2%. This paper is the first report of an environmentally friendly approach for recycling smelting slag without generating any hazardous waste.

Subject terms: Environmental monitoring, Environmental impact, Environmental chemistry

Introduction

Smelting slag is a typical hazardous waste generated in the smelting and metallurgy industry1,2. Slag contains high concentrations of heavy metals, such as Cu, Zn, Cr and Ni, which are harmful if released into the environment3. In China, smelting slag is disposed of as an environmental priority pollutant, wherein the slag is generally stabilized with cement before landfilling for safety purposes4. Although smelting slag is a potential source of various alloys5–7, it is difficult to recycle slag due to its complex impurities, such as Fe, Al, Si, Ca and high-molecular-weight organic matter, which are mainly derived from flocculants in smelting wastewater treatment7,8. The conventional method for recycling heavy metals from smelting slag is chemical leaching with a strong acid5–7,9. Most heavy metals in the slag are dissolved by strong acid leaching, followed by the dissolution of impurities (e.g., Fe and Al). However, this method has two main disadvantages. First, previous studies have shown that Fe/Al impurities are easily complexed with extraction agents and/or coprecipitated with heavy metals in the recycling process, thereby decreasing the purity of the recoverable heavy metals10,11. Second, it has been reported that Si/Ca compounds and high-molecular-weight organic matter in slag do not completely dissolve; instead, these materials are commonly complexed with residual heavy metals to generate hazardous undissolved solid waste12, which should be properly treated before landfilling. Thus, the strong acid leaching method needs to be modified to effectively recycle heavy metals without generating hazardous waste. Studies have revealed that the impurities in slag are mainly introduced by the addition of flocculants, such as polyaluminum chloride, polyferric sulfate, polysilicic acid and polyacrylamide, during smelting wastewater treatment13–15. Therefore, we hypothesized that in smelting wastewater treatment, the use of a single flocculant might effectively reduce impurities in the leaching acid and eliminate the undissolved solid.

In leaching acid, Fe is in the ferric form and can be removed through chemical precipitation16 and/or hydrothermal methods6,7,17, resulting in a high concentration of heavy metals in the acid. For example, nearly 100% of Fe was removed as Fe oxyhydroxide when the acid was adjusted to a pH of 416,18. However, the formed Fe oxyhydroxide had a sufficient number of hydroxyl groups for heavy metal coordination, resulting in a low retention rate of heavy metals in the acid9. Compared with chemical precipitation, the hydrothermal method exhibits a higher retention rate of heavy metals. Lu et al. found that after Fe/Cu-bearing hydrochloric acid was hydrothermally treated at 155 °C for 60 min, less than 0.1% of the Cu was removed, whereas nearly 30% of total Fe was removed as hematite7. With the addition of H2O2, the total Fe removal rate further increased to 90.7%6. Despite the effective removal of Fe from the leaching acid, the residual Fe was highly concentrated (nearly 1.5 g/L); hence, further separation was required before heavy metal recycling17.

The objective of this study was to develop a novel route to recycle heavy metals (e.g., Zn and Cu) from smelting slag without generating any secondary waste. The study also aimed to optimize the recycling conditions to obtain high-purity Zn/Cu products.

Materials and methods

Smelting slag treatment

Smelting wastewater was discharged from the electroplating workshop of Sanhe Company (Changchun, Jilin, China), in which the residual Zn and Cu concentrations were 30.7 and 19.3 mg/L, respectively. The smelting wastewater was treated by coagulation through the addition of commercial FeCl3 6H2O. Crystallized FeCl3 6H2O was added to approximately 2 t of wastewater, which was stored in a flocculation tank, at a dosage of approximately 0.8 g/L. Subsequently, the wastewater was adjusted to a pH of 7.5 through the addition of caustic soda under constant stirring at 70–90 rpm for 1 h followed by 24 h of precipitation. A yellowish precipitate was generated at the bottom of the tank, which was pumped to a plate and frame filter press (XAMY6/450-30U, Runnan-Shanghai, China) to mechanically dewater. Thus, brownish sludge cake was generated.

Samples were taken from the smelting slag, and then the sampled slag was completely dissolved in nitric acid solution at room temperature for one week. The leaching solution contained 23.5 g/L Fe, 4.45 g/L Zn, 2.81 g/L Cu, 61.8 g/L NO3- and 3.75 g/L Cl-.

Fe separation experiments

Highly purified Fe oxides were successfully separated from the leaching solution via a one-step hydrothermal route. First, 20 mL of leaching solution was adjusted to a pH of 0.4 through the addition of 5 M NaOH solution, after which the solution was dumped into a 50 mL Teflon vessel. The amount of Fe in the vessel was approximately 8.39 mmol. Second, 16.79 mmol levulinic acid (LA) was directly added to the vessel, thereby achieving a MLA/MFe ratio of 2. Third, the vessel was sealed, placed in a drying oven (DHG-9030A, Yiheng, Shanghai, China), heated to 220 °C for 6 h and then water-cooled to room temperature. Fourth, the supernatant and deposit were collected separately and then freeze-dried overnight at −80 °C. Control experiments were also performed by decreasing the MLA/MFe ratio from 2 to 1, 0.5, 0.25 and 0. The concentrations of Fe, Zn and Cu in the supernatant were measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, Avio-200, Perkinelmer, USA). To optimize the hydrothermal treatment time for Fe precipitation, time-course experiments were also carried out according to the abovementioned procedures. The hydrothermal treatment time was reduced from 6 to 4, 2, 1 and 0.5 h, and the corresponding deposit and supernatant were also characterized.

At an MLA/MFe ratio of 1, nearly 100% Fe removal was achieved. Thus, the residual Zn and Cu in the supernatant was recycled by directly adjusting the supernatant to a pH of 9 through the addition of 5 M NaOH. The generated deposit was collected and then washed three times with deionized water, followed by drying at 105 °C for 5 h. The Fe, Zn and Cu concentrations in the residual supernatant were also determined by ICP-OES.

All experiments in this study were performed in triplicate, and the average of the values was reported. Various sets of the experimental data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance using Microsoft Excel (v. 2016, Microsoft, USA), and the differences between the sets of data were not statistically significant.

Characterization

The deposited particles were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6400, Jeol, Japan), X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku, Rint2200, Japan) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF, S4-Explorer, Bruker, Germany). The nitrate and nitrite in the supernatant were determined by ion chromatography (881 Pro, Metrohm, Switzerland). The pH value and total organic carbon (TOC) were measured using a pH meter (S210-S, Mettler Toledo, USA) and a TOC analyzer (TOC 500, Shimadzu, Japan), respectively.

Results and discussion

Optimization of LA dosage

Fe was efficiently separated from the leaching acid, as shown in Fig. 1. Without LA, the Fe removal rate reached 88.3%, whereas the removal rates of Zn and Cu were both less than 0.5% (Fig. 1(A)). Additionally, the nitrate concentration decreased from 61.8 g/L to 56.3 g/L (Fig. 1(B)), and the solution pH slightly decreased from 0.4 to 0.2. By adding LA, the total Fe removal rate significantly increased to 98.2% at a molar ratio (MLA/MFe) of 0.5, peaked at nearly 100% at a molar ratio of 1, and slightly decreased to 99.5% at a molar ratio of 2. Accordingly, the Zn and Cu removal rates slightly increased from 0.52% and 0.66% at a molar ratio of 0.5 to 0.78% and 0.84% at the molar ratio of 1, whereas they substantially increased to 21.5% and 14.5% at a molar ratio of 2. Therefore, the optimal molar ratio was 1 for highly efficient separation of Fe from leaching acid, in which the Fe removal rate was nearly 100% (the residual Fe concentration was 0.43 mg/L) and the Zn and Cu removal rates were both less than 1%.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Variations in the (A) removal rates of Fe, Zn and Cu, the (B) concentrations of nitrate and TOC, and the (C) pH values with increasing LA dosage.

The decreases in the TOC and nitrate content were also observed. For instance, at a molar ratio of 1, the concentration of the residual nitrate was 8.3 g/L, whereas the concentration of the residual TOC was 0.6 g/L, suggesting that the added LA was inadequate to completely oxidize nitrate. When the molar ratio increased from 1 to 2, the nitrate concentration decreased to 0.47 g/L, whereas the residual TOC concentration increased to 9.2 g/L, demonstrating that approximately 99.2% of the nitrate was removed by the excessive dosage of LA. As the LA dosage increased, the solution pH increased to 2.5 at a molar ratio of 1 and further increased to 3.6 at a molar ratio of 2, indicating that H+ was involved in the redox reaction between LA and nitrate. The variation of TOC and nitrate were subjected to the reaction between LA and nitrate under hydrothermal conditions (these conditions will be discussed in Section 3.4).

Without the addition of LA, Fe was removed as hematite particles (Fig. 2, molar ratio = 0) with diameters of 300–500 nm (Fig. 3(A)). After adding LA, sharp peaks of hematite were also observed in the curves of the particles generated at molar ratios of 0.5 and 1 (Fig. 2); however, the diameter of the particles gradually decreased to approximately 200 nm as the molar ratio increased to 1 (Fig. 3(B,C)). A previous study revealed that LA and its oxidized intermediates were electrostatically adsorbed on the positively charged surface of hematite particles during hydrothermal treatment, which inhibited the aggregation and crystal growth of hematite particles and resulted in smaller hematite particles than those observed without the addition of LA19. When the molar ratio was 2, the obtained particles showed sharp peaks of hematite and new peaks at 2θ = 18.8° and 30.3° corresponding to humboldtine (Fig. 2, molar ratio = 2); hence, the obtained particles were a mixture of spherical hematite particles and small humboldtine chips (Fig. 3(D)).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

XRD patterns of the precipitated hematite particles generated at molar ratios ranging from 0 to 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

SEM images of the precipitated particles generated at molar ratios of (A) 0, (B) 0.5, (C) 1 and (D) 2.

To analyze the components of the generated hematite with the optimal LA dosage, an XRF experiment was performed (Fig. 4). The precipitated hematite contained 97.3% Fe2O3, 0.64% ZnO and 0.58% CuO, which is highly purified and can subsequently be used as a raw material in the dye and electronic industries.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Major composition of the precipitated hematite particles generated with the optimal LA dosage and 6 h of hydrothermal treatment.

Optimization of the hydrothermal treatment time

The time course of Fe removal from the leaching acid with different hydrothermal treatment times was investigated, as shown in Fig. 5. The Fe removal rate increased to 82.3% after 0.5 h of treatment, then further increased to 99.2% after 1 h of treatment, and became steady at nearly 100% as the treatment time extended to 6 h. The Zn and Cu removal rates were 0.31% and 0.43% after 0.5 h of treatment, followed by slight increases to 0.78% and 0.84% after 1 h of treatment, and then remained nearly constant as the treatment time extended to 6 h. These results revealed that the hydrothermal treatment time is an important factor for Fe precipitation. With extension of the hydrothermal treatment time, the nitrate and TOC concentrations gradually decreased from 61.8 g/L and 12.3 g/L after 1 h of treatment to 8.33 g/L and 0.95 g/L after 6 h of treatment on account of the redox reaction between the nitrate and TOC. Consequently, the solution pH gradually increased from the initial 0.4 to 1.5 after 0.5 h of treatment and finally to 2.5 after 6 h of treatment.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Variations in the (A) removal rate of Fe, Zn and Cu, (B) concentrations of nitrate and TOC and (C) pH as the hydrothermal treatment time extends from 0 to 6 h.

With hydrothermal treatment, Fe precipitated into irregular akaganeite aggregates with uniform distributions of Fe and blurred distributions of Zn and Cu during the first 1 h of treatment [Fig. 6 (0.5 h and 1 h) and Fig. 7(A,B)], subsequently transformed into hematite aggregates after 2 h of treatment [Fig. 6 (2 h) and Fig. 7(C)], and finally formed into spherical hematite particles with diameters of approximately 200 nm after 4 h of treatment. These results demonstrated the precipitation of Fe as hematite spheres with akaganeite aggregates as the intermediate. The formation of akaganeite will be discussed in Section 3.4.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

XRD patterns of the particles generated at hydrothermal treatment times of 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

SEM images of the hematite particles generated at hydrothermal treatment times of (A) 0.5 h, (B) 1 h, (C) 2 h, and (D) 4 h.

Recycling of Cu/Zn-bearing particles

After Fe was removed from the leaching solution, the residual Zn and Cu concentrations were 4.42 and 2.78 g/L, respectively; these values are approximately 140 times those in the smelting wastewater. The residual Cu and Zn were recovered as the Cu/Zn-bearing irregular aggregates (Fig. 8(A)) by adjusting the solution pH to 9. The Cu and Zn precipitated as a mixture of simonkolleite and paratacamite (Fig. 8(B)), in which the relative weight percentages of Zn and Cu were 33.6% and 21.7%, respectively, whereas that of Fe was less than 0.2%. These results demonstrated that the Cu/Zn mixture was highly purified.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(A) SEM image, (B) XRD pattern and (C) major composition of the precipitated Cu/Zn mixture.

Separation mechanism of Fe from the leaching acid

Fe was abundant in the leaching solution and was spontaneously hydrolyzed in three steps under hydrothermal conditions. First, Fe was hydrolyzed to weakly crystallized Fe oxyhydroxides (Eq. (1)), such as Fe2+OH, Fe+(OH)2 and Fe(OH)320,21. Second, the conjunction of two adjacent hydroxyl groups on each Fe oxyhydroxide occurred, to release one water molecule, with the formation of an Fe-O-Fe bond22,23. Third, as the above reaction continued, akageneite was generated and further transformed into hematite (Eq. (2)).

Fe3++3H2O→Fe(OH)3+3H+, 1
2Fe(OH)3→Fe2O3+3H2O, 2

To further analyze the hydrolysis of Fe, the leaching solution was hydrothermally treated without LA according to the method in Section 2.2, and then the particles generated after 0.2 h of treatment were characterized by XRD (Fig. 9). The typical peaks of Fe2O(OH)3NO3 H2O and akaganeite were observed in the curve of the hydrolyzed product of Fe after 0.15 h of hydrothermal treatment, demonstrating that the Fe-O-Fe bond was generated from the polymerization of the initial hydrolyzed product (e.g., Fe2O(OH)3NO3 H2O) with akageneite as the intermediate. Elmasry et al. investigated the thermal decomposition of Fe(NO3)3 9H2O and found that the major intermediates were Fe(OH)(NO3)2 and Fe(OH)2NO321 with hematite as the final product, which is similar to the findings in this study.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

XRD pattern of the hematite particles generated after 0.2 h of hydrothermal treatment.

During Fe hydrolysis, OH- was involved in the formation of Fe oxyhydroxides. The residual H+ led to a decrease in solution pH from 0.4 to 0.2 (Fig. 1(C)). In the leaching acid, the coprecipitation of Fe and Zn/Cu did not occur. When the free Zn and Cu were coordinated on the surface hydroxyl group (≡Fe-O-H) of the Fe oxyhydroxides, the polymerization of two adjacent Fe oxyhydroxides was inhibited. However, H+ was rich in the leaching acid and easily replaced the coordinated Zn/Cu on the Fe oxyhydroxides, which regenerated the hydroxyl group, thereby promoting the polymerization reaction of Fe oxyhydroxides with hematite as the final product. During the hydrothermal treatment process, H+ accumulated in the acid and finally remained constant, in which the hydrolysis of Fe was in equilibrium, which led to a relatively high level of residual Fe. In addition, nitrate was also hydrothermally decomposed to NO2 and O224 via Eq. (3), which caused a decrease in nitrate concentration (Fig. 1(B)).

2NO3−→2NO2+O2, 3

When LA was introduced in the leaching acid, the redox reaction between LA and nitrate occurred via Eq. (4). The carboxyl group on the side chain of the LA molecule was prone to losing electrons via a decarboxylation reaction with the generation of 2-butanone and methyl vinyl ketone25, which was further oxidized to oxalic acid with CO2 and H2O as the final product. After hydrothermal reaction with an MLA/MFe ratio of 2, the supernatant was collected, and then the residual concentrations of 2-butanone and methyl vinyl ketone in the supernatant were determined by headspace-gas chromatography (HS-GC, QP2010-Ultra, Shimadzu, Japan) following the method of Gong et al.26, whereas the oxalic acid concentration was detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, LA-20, Shimadzu, Japan) in accordance with Pelin et al.27. The concentrations of 2-butanone and methyl vinyl ketone were 23.9 and 0.07 mg/L, respectively, which were both lower than that of oxalic acid (282.4 mg/L). This demonstrated the generation of 2-butanone, methyl vinyl ketone and oxalic acid in the reaction between LA and nitrate. Similar intermediates of 2-butanone and methyl vinyl ketone were also observed in the oxidative decarboxylation of LA by Ag+/S2O82- after autoclaving at 100 °C for 0.5 h26. As the LA continued to be consumed, both TOC and nitrate concentrations decreased, whereas the solution pH increased, which promoted the further hydrolysis of Fe to Fe oxyhydroxides. The newly generated Fe oxyhydroxides were steadily transformed to akageneite in the presence of a sufficient amount of Cl-. Figure 10 shows that the initial concentration of Cl- was 3.75 g/L, which decreased to 3.17 g/L after 0.5 h of hydrothermal treatment and then gradually increased to 3.63 g/L as the hydrothermal treatment time extended to 6 h. These findings suggest that Cl- was involved in the formation of akageneite.

C5H8O3+4NO3−+2H+→2N2+5CO2+5H2O, 4

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Concentration of Cl- in the supernatant after hydrothermal treatment.

Akageneite has a tetragonal structure, in which the inner tunnels parallel to the c-axis of the tetragonal lattice are partially occupied by Cl-, F- and OH-28 for structural crystal stability29,30. When the hydrothermal treatment time was longer than 2 h, the in situ conversion of akaganeite to hematite occurred with the release of water molecules and Cl- in the tunnels31,32, which was in agreement with the release of Cl- in the conversion of akageneite to hematite (Fig. 10). Therefore, the Fe precipitated as Fe oxyhydroxides and finally converted to hematite with akageneite as the intermediate.

Potential application

For safety purposes, smelting slag is commonly collected by a professional waste company and stabilized with cement before landfilling. According to the price provided by Lantian Waste Ltd. (Changchun, China), the total cost for disposing 1 ton of smelting slag is approximately US$ 1304.3, which could be saved by recycling Cu/Zn-bearing products. The reuse of 1 ton of smelting slag requires power (US$ 92.4) and approximately 1.68 tons of nitric acid, 0.44 tons of LA, and 0.486 tons of caustic soda, bringing the total cost to US$ 1496.7. However, costly LA can be replaced by a cheap organic acid, and the product of the hematite and Zn/Cu mixture is highly marketable, which can reduce the cost of slag reutilization. Therefore, the processing method for recycling Zn/Cu from smelting slag has potential applications.

The method described in this study has two advantages in the disposal of smelting slag. One advantage is the effective removal of Fe from the leaching acid, which produces hematite nanoparticles with a purity of 97.3%. The other advantage is the low residual Fe content and high retention of Zn and Cu in the leaching acid. Thus, the highly purified Zn/Cu product was recycled without generating any secondary waste. The recycled Zn/Cu precipitates contained 33.6% Zn and 21.7% Cu with less than 0.2% Fe. The composition meets the guidelines for the active pharmaceutical ingredients of commercial Zn/Cu oxyhydroxide33,34, demonstrating the economic value of the recycled Zn/Cu mixture. In addition, the Zn/Cu precipitates can be easily divided into two purified solutions (Zn-bearing or Cu-bearing) via purification methods, including liquid membrane35, resin extraction36, or solvent extraction37, and then directly reused as raw materials in the electroplating process. Other heavy metals, such as Ni, Pb and Cd, showed similar chemical performance to Zn and Cu. These other metals can also be precipitated from wastewater as slag through the addition of a polyferric chloride flocculant, which can be recycled to produce highly purified heavy metal-bearing products. Furthermore, the removal of Fe impurities in this study may shed light on promoting the extraction efficiency of valuable materials (e.g., rare earth metals) from metal-bearing solutions and wastewater. Future studies should focus on the separation of Fe with the addition of low-cost organic matter and the effectiveness of recycling other heavy metals.

Conclusion

Zn/Cu-bearing smelting wastewater was treated by chemical coagulation with polyferric chloride to generate Zn/Cu smelting slag. The slag was dissolved in nitric acid to generate an Fe/Zn/Cu-bearing solution. Through an optimized hydrothermal treatment (6 h), Fe was precipitated as hematite nanoparticles with a purity of 97.3%, and the residual Fe concentration in the acid was 0.43 mg/L; the removal rate was less than 1% for both Zn and Cu. The concentrations of Zn and Cu in the acid were 4.42 and 2.78 g/L, respectively; these concentrations are approximately 140 times those in the smelting wastewater. Zn/Cu in the acid was further precipitated by adjusting the solution pH to 9, and the final relative weight percentages of Zn and Cu were 33.6% and 21.7%, respectively, whereas the Fe content was less than 0.2%.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 51578118, 51678273, 51878133, 51878134 and 51908109) and the Science and Technology Program of Jilin Province (grant No. 20190303001SF).

Author contributions

Suiyi Zhu designed the study. Xiang Song collated the data. Yu Chen, Xue Lin and Yaqiong Wu conducted the experiments and analyzed the data. Suiyi Zhu and Yang Huo wrote the manuscript. Zhan Qu and Ting Su performed the supplementary experiments. Xinfeng Xie modified the language of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Maweja K, Mukongo T, Mutombo I. Cleaning of a copper matte smelting slag from a water-jacket furnace by direct reduction of heavy metals. J. Hazard Mater. 2009;164:856–862. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vítková M, Ettler V, Mihaljevič M, Šebek O. Effect of sample preparation on contaminant leaching from copper smelting slag. J Hazard Mater R. 2011;197:417–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Navarro A, Cardellach E, Mendoza JL, Corbella M, Domenech LM. Metal mobilization from base-metal smelting slag dumps in Sierra Almagrera (Almería, Spain) Applied Geochemistry. 2008;23:895–913. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.07.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li YC, et al. Co-treatment of gypsum sludge and Pb/Zn smelting slag for the solidification of sludge containing arsenic and heavy metals. Journal of Environmental Management. 2016;181:756–761. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Banza A, Gock E, Kongolo K. Base metals recovery from copper smelter slag by oxidising leaching and solvent extraction. Hydrometallurgy. 2002;67:63–69. doi: 10.1016/S0304-386X(02)00138-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.He J, Wu S-N, Tang M-T, Chen Y-M, Wang T. Separation of Zinc and Iron in Sulfate System with Hydrothermal Method and Preparation of Ferric Oxide Powder for Soft Magnetic Ferrite. Mining and Metallurgical Engineering. 2010;30:85–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lu J, Dreisinger D. Pressure oxidation of ferrous ions by oxygen and hematite precipitation from concentrated solution of calcium, copper and iron chlorides. Hydrometallurgy. 2013;140:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2013.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qu, Z. et al. Green Synthesis of Magnetic Adsorbent Using Groundwater Treatment Sludge for Tetracycline Adsorption. Engineering. (2019).
  • 9.Lewis AE. Review of metal sulphide precipitation. Hydrometallurgy. 2010;104:222–234. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kikuchi Y, Matsumiya M, Kawakami S. Extraction of rare earth ions from Nd-Fe-B magnet wastes with TBP in tricaprylmethylammonium nitrate. Solvent Extraction Research and Development. 2014;21:137–145. doi: 10.15261/serdj.21.137. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li H, Guo F, Zhang Z, Li D, Wang Z. A new hydrometallurgical process for extracting rare earths from apatite using solvent extraction with P350. Journal of alloys and compounds. 2006;408:995–998. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.12.119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Beşe AV. Effect of ultrasound on the dissolution of copper from copper converter slag by acid leaching. Ultrasonics sonochemistry. 2007;14:790–796. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2007.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xu L, et al. Optimization and assessment of Fe–electrocoagulation for the removal of potentially toxic metals from real smelting wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management. 2018;218:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Basha CA, Selvi S, Ramasamy JE, Chellammal S. Removal of arsenic and sulphate from the copper smelting industrial effluent. Chem Eng J,. 2008;141:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.10.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sun M, et al. New insights into the rapid formation of initial membrane fouling after in-situ cleaning in a membrane bioreactor. PROCESS BIOCHEM. 2019;78:108–113. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2019.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Binnemans K, et al. Recycling of rare earths: a critical review. J Clean prod. 2013. 2013;51:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kelen, T. Method of preventing the deposition of radioactive corrosion products in nuclear plants. Google Patents (1999).
  • 18.Zhang H, Sun M, Song L, Guo J, Zhang L. Fate of NaClO and membrane foulants during in-situ cleaning of membrane bioreactors: Combined effect on thermodynamic properties of sludge. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2019;147:146–152. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2019.04.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Esmaeili E, Salavati-Niasari M, Mohandes F, Davar F, Seyghalkar H. Modified single-phase hematite nanoparticles via a facile approach for large-scale synthesis. Chem Eng J. 2011;170:278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wieczorek-Ciurowa K, Kozak AJ. The Thermal Decomposition of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 1999;58:647–651. doi: 10.1023/A:1010112814013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Elmasry MAA, Gaber A, Khater EMH. Thermal Decomposition of Ni(II) and Fe(III) Nitrates and their Mixture. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 1998;52:489–495. doi: 10.1023/A:1010155203247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schwertmann U, Friedl J, Stanjek H. From Fe(III) Ions to Ferrihydrite and then to Hematite. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1999;209:215–223. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1998.5899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhu S, et al. Valorization of manganese-containing groundwater treatment sludge by preparing magnetic adsorbent for Cu (II) adsorption. Journal of environmental management. 2019;236:446–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yuvaraj S, Fan-Yuan L, Tsong-Huei C, Chuin-Tih Y. Thermal Decomposition of Metal Nitrates in Air and Hydrogen Environments. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2003;107:1044–1047. doi: 10.1021/jp026961c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gong Y, Lin L, Yan Z. Catalytic hydrogenation and oxidation of biomass-derived levulinic acid. Bioresources. 2011;6:686–699. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gong Y, Lin L. Oxidative decarboxylation of levulinic acid by silver (I)/persulfate. Molecules. 2011;16:2714–2725. doi: 10.3390/molecules16032714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ergonul PG, Nergiz C. Determination of organic acids in olive fruit by HPLC. Czech. J. Food. Sci. 2010;28:202–205. doi: 10.17221/1379-CJFS. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xiong H, Zhou L. Synthesis of iron oxyhydroxides of different crystal forms and their roles in adsorption and removal of Cr(VI)from aqueous solutions. ACTA Petrologica ET Mineralogica. 2008;27:559–566. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rémazeilles C, Refait P. On the formation of β-FeOOH (akaganéite) in chloride-containing environments. Corrosion Science. 2007;49:844–857. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2006.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhu S, et al. Green synthesis of magnetic sodalite sphere by using groundwater treatment sludge for tetracycline adsorption. J Clean prod. 2020;247:119140. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Asenath-Smith E, Estroff LA. Role of Akaganeite (β-FeOOH) in the Growth of Hematite (α-Fe2O3) in an Inorganic Silica Hydrogel. Crystal Growth & Design. 2015;15:3388–3398. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b00475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Qu Z, et al. Recycling of groundwater treatment sludge to prepare nano-rod erdite particles for tetracycline adsorption. J Clean prod. 2020;257:120462. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hoboy, L. P., Wolf, N. A. & Yoder, T. F. Process to produce simonkolleite, zinc oxide and zinc hydroxide. Google Patents (2005).
  • 34.Vaughan, J., Hawker, P. W. Hayes & J. Evgueni, Copper processing method. Google Patents (2016).
  • 35.Mondal DN, et al. Cu—Zn separation by supported liquid membrane analyzed through Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms. Hydrometallurgy. 2011;107:112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bari F, Begum N, Jamaludin SB, Hussin K. Extraction and separation of Cu (II), Ni (II) and Zn (II) by sol–gel silica immobilized with Cyanex 272. Hydrometallurgy. 2009;96:140–147. doi: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Keng X, Jiankang W, Yixin H, Renman R. Selective separation of Cu (II), Zn (II), and Cd (II) by solvent extraction. Rare Metals, 2008. 2008;27:228–232. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES