Skip to main content
Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 May 14;107(8):e242. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11675

When preserving life becomes imperative, quality of life is eclipsed! COVID-19 outbreak impacting patients with pelvic floor disorders undergoing pelvic floor rehabilitation

L Brusciano 1, G Gualtieri 1, C Gambardella 1,2, S Tolone 1, F S Lucido 1, G del Genio 1, G Pellino 3,4, L Docimo 1
PMCID: PMC7272943  PMID: 32406933

Editor

During the COVID-19 pandemic, suspension of outpatient clinics1 might have left many patients without care, likely impacting their quality of life. Patients affected by faecal incontinence, functional constipation and pain used to attend our division weekly to receive pelvic floor rehabilitation. Even though not life-threatening, these conditions cause great discomfort, which is relieved by rehabilitation.

We anticipated that the required close contact with the physiotherapist would have prevented patients from attending the clinic due to fear of infection, even before more stringent measures were taken by the government. Surprisingly, patients continued to attend rehabilitative sessions with great motivation. Rather, they were concerned that discontinuation of treatment could have affected their quality of life. Because a national shortage of personal protective equipment soon occurred, those willing to continue their treatment were invited to attend wearing their own masks and gloves2. We registered the usual number of appointments until the lockdown was enforced, cancelling non-emergency outpatient activities1. Patients on pelvic floor rehabilitation programmes were informed and, even if realizing the magnitude of the pandemic and the need to delay their treatment, still showed hopes of resuming rehabilitation soon, once again confirming how quality of life is tightly connected to such treatment.

COVID-19 has led to dramatic re-adjustment of social habits and health systems. Patients affected by pelvic floor disorders demonstrated a strong will to continue their rehabilitation, regardless of the possibility of contagion upon attending hospital. There might be times when quality of life is eclipsed by other urgent matters (like preserving life itself!)3, but it is crucial to protect and reassure patients needing such treatments, and to start working on how rehabilitation can benefit from telemedicine and remote consultation4.

References

  • 1. Spinelli  A, Pellino  G. COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives on an unfolding crisis. Br J Surg  2020; 10.1002/bjs.11627 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gackowski  A, Lipczyńska  M, Lipiec  P, Szymański  P. Expert opinion of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the Polish Cardiac Society on performing echocardiographic examinations during COVID-19 pandemic. Kardiol Pol  2020; 10.33963/KP.15265 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ives  J, Huxtable  R. Surgical ethics during a pandemic: moving into the unknown?  Br J Surg  2020; 10.1002/bjs.11638 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Augestad  KM, Sneve  AM, Lindsetmo  RO. Telemedicine in postoperative follow-up of STOMa PAtients: a randomized clinical trial (the STOMPA trial). Br J Surg  2020; 107: 509–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES