Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Jun 2;34(8):e378–e380. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16628

Personal protective equipment induced facial dermatoses in healthcare workers managing Coronavirus disease 2019

M Singh 1, M Pawar 2,, A Bothra 3, A Maheshwari 4, V Dubey 5, A Tiwari 6, A Kelati 7
PMCID: PMC7272982  PMID: 32396675

Editor,

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, frontline healthcare workers (HCW) are working tirelessly for long hours to provide patient care. Although COVID is not dermatotropic, prolonged contact with personal protective equipment (PPE, i.e. goggles, face‐shield/visor, N 95 respirator, double‐layered gloves, coverall/gowns, head cover and shoe cover) may cause various dermatoses. Several dermatoses have been reported due to PPE, such as pressure injury, contact dermatitis, pressure urticaria and exacerbation of pre‐existing skin diseases, including seborrheic dermatitis and acne. 1 , 2 We report a preliminary data of HCW who experienced facial dermatoses due to the use of PPE.

From 24 March 2020 to 16 April 2020, we came across with 43 patients comprising physicians, nurses and paramedical staff who involved (directly/indirectly) in managing patients of COVID‐19. We used telemedicine to consult these patients. Their history, clinical findings including onset, duration, location, clinical features and other associated symptoms of dermatoses and type of PPE used were recorded. However, patch could not be performed. Final diagnosis was based on history, clinical findings and pattern of dermatoses and symptoms.

The most commonly noted dermatoses were irritant contact dermatitis (ICD; 39.5%) followed by friction dermatitis (25.5%). Goggles were the most common culprit agent among all PPE causing any one of the dermatoses (51.92%), followed by N95 masks (30.77%) and face shields (17.31%). Nasal bridge (63%) was the commonest anatomical site affected due to dermatoses followed by cheeks and chin (26%). However, there was a considerable overlap of different dermatoses with affliction of multiple sites. The most common symptom experienced by patients was pruritus (67.44%), while erythema (53.49%) was the most common sign observed. Interestingly, we observed two distinct dermatoses, i.e. whole face erythema (suffusion; 21%) attributed to doffing after a long shift and lip lick dermatitis due to constant licking of lips, because of feeling of intense thirst due to restricted fluid intake after donning PPE. The duration of wearing the goggles and mask, excessive sweating and ill‐fitting masks, all were associated with increased sensation of irritation. Most of these dermatoses responded well to topical moisturizer, calamine lotion and oral antihistamines. Overall, 21% patients suffered from work absenteeism due to one of the dermatoses (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical features and other data of health care workers suffered from dermatoses

Variables Number (n) Percentage (%)
Number of patients 43
Mean age 32.78 ± 14.51
Sex (Male: Female) 1.39
Average duration PPE worn per day (hours): 8.76 ± 2.31
Average time after which rotation/doffing done (hours): 4.08 ± 1.01
Healthcare role:
i. Doctors 31 72.09
ii. Nurses 9 20.93
iii. Miscellaneous like ward assistants/cleaners/transport teams 3 6.98
Type of dermatoses:
i. Irritant contact dermatitis 17 39.53
ii. Allergic dermatitis 03 6.98
iii. Pressure/friction marks/rhagades 11 25.58
iv. Sweat dermatitis 07 16.28
v. Facial acne 05 11.63
vi. Lip lick dermatitis 04 09.30
Site:
i. Forehead 09 20.93
ii. Eyelids/canthus (goggle dermatitis) 12 27.91
iii. Nasal bridge (goggle and mask dermatitis/pressure dermatosis) 27 62.79
iv. Temple (Visor/mask straps) 09 20.93
v. Medial concha of ear (N95 respirator straps) 07 16.28
vi. Cheeks and chin 11 25.58
vii. Lips/angle of mouth 04 09.30
Symptoms:
i. Itching 29 67.44
ii. Rash/redness 21 48.84
iii. Burning 11 25.58
iv. Smarting 08 18.60
v. Skin tightness/dryness 16 37.21
Signs:
i. Erythema 23 53.49
ii. Vesicles 09 20.93
iii. Scaling 19 44.19
iv. Urticaria 02 04.65
v. Papules 07 16.28
vi. Pustules 04 09.30
vii. Pressure indentations and bruising 20 46.51
viii. Excessive lacrimation 08 18.60
ix. Rhinorrhoea 06 13.95
x. Skin discontinuity (Erosions/fissuring/excoriation) 31 72.09
Systemic features:
i. Nausea 05 11.63
ii. Headaches 27 62.79
iii. Sneezing 04 09.30
iv. Feeling of intense heat 37 86.05
v. Claustrophobia/agitation with PPE suit 31 72.09
vi. Facial rubeosis/suffusion 09 20.93
Allergic predisposition 07 16.28
Treatment given:
i. Spontaneous resolution with frequent breaks alone 08 18.60
ii. Topical calamine with aloe vera extracts 10 23.26
iii. Topical tacrolimus 09 20.93
iv. Topical low to mid potency steroids 04 09.30
v. Oat colloidal meal based moisturizer 24 55.81
vi. Petroleum jelly 04 09.30
vii. Systemic antihistamines 15 34.88
Patients requiring rescue steroids 04 09.30
Work absenteeism 09 20.93

Personal protective equipment‐induced dermatoses occur mainly due to the occlusion and hyper‐hydration effect of PPE and friction leading breach in the epidermal integrity. 1 Recently, in China, authors noted a very high prevalence, i.e. 97% of skin damages in first‐line HCW fighting COVID‐19. 3 Yin Z in his study found N‐95 mask‐induced pressure sore on the nasal bridge in HCW managing COVID‐19 patients. 4 Skin barrier may create a portal of entry for COVID‐19, as angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2, the cell receptor for Severe acute respiratory distress‐related Coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), is abundantly present in blood vessels of the skin and the basal layer of the epidermis. 5 As cases of COVID‐19 are on rise with exponential phase, we fear that the dermatoses‐induced skin breach and irritation, and frequent touching of face due to latter, may increase the exposure and entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in the healthcare workers.

Air‐conditioning, proper fitting masks, use of better material (latex straps to be avoided) in the goggles and frequent rotation and regular breaks with removal of the mask and wiping of skin to remove sweat, may help in alleviation of dermatoses in HCW. Adequate hydration is useful to avoid dehydration‐induced dermatoses and dry skin. 6 Moisturizers or emollients are needed to restore the integrity of skin barrier and should be applied at least 30 min before wearing mask, to prevent the damage to mask. Staff is advised not to smoke if they have applied emollient containing white soft paraffin, as it is flammable. 6 Low potency topical steroid or tacrolimus is required in some cases if above measures fail. 7

References


Articles from Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES