Skip to main content
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment logoLink to Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
. 2020 Jun 3;19:1533033820928072. doi: 10.1177/1533033820928072

Knockdown of NCOA2 Inhibits the Growth and Progression of Gastric Cancer by Affecting the Wnt Signaling Pathway–Related Protein Expression

Zhenlv Lin 1, Fan Yang 2, Dong Lu 3, Wenjie Sun 4, Guangwei Zhu 4,, Bin Lan 4,
PMCID: PMC7273340  PMID: 32489143

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of the study is to determine the role of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 in cell proliferation and invasion ability of gastric cancer cells and to explore its possible mechanisms.

Methods:

Immunohistochemical staining was used to determine NCOA2 gene expression in gastric cancer. Western blotting was used to detect Wnt signal pathways–related protein expression. Colony formation assays, Cell Counting Kit-8 assays, and transwell assays were used to determine cell proliferation, metastasis, and invasion ability of gastric cancer cells. A flow cytometric apoptosis tests determine gastric cancer cell apoptosis ability after inhibition of the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2. Subcutaneous mouse models were used to determine the gastric cancer growth and peritoneal metastasis differences after inhibition the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2.

Results:

The expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 in gastric cancer cells is high (P < .01), including lymph node metastasis, TNM staging, and gender differences in nuclear receptor coactivator 2 expression were statistically significant (P < .01). Short interfering nuclear receptor coactivator 2 could inhibit the proliferation and invasion ability of gastric cancer cells. Short interfering nuclear receptor coactivator 2 promotes the apoptosis of gastric cancer cells. Animal experiments showed that short interfering nuclear receptor coactivator 2 could inhibit the growth and invasion of gastric cancer-transplantable tumors. Knockdown of the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 inhibited the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in the gastric cancer cells.

Conclusions:

Knockdown of the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 can inhibit the proliferation and invasion of human gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. The underlying mechanism of NOCA2 affects the Wnt signaling pathway.

Keywords: gastric cancer, nuclear receptor coactivator 2, growth, progression, Wnt signaling pathway

Introduction

Gastric cancer is very common worldwide, especially in East Asia.1 Early gastric cancer often has no obvious symptoms or is associated with some nonspecific symptoms, such as indigestion and loss of appetite. Gastric cancer often reached late stage when symptoms appear. The 5-year survival rate after surgery is only 20% to 40%.2 Therefore, it is important to discover new biomarkers and broader mechanisms involved in the development and metastasis of gastric cancer.

Nuclear receptor coactivator 2 (NCOA2, aka SRC-2) is a transcriptional regulator of nuclear receptors that plays a key role in regulation of energy balance.3-6 The transcription factor NCOA2 is a member of the p160 family, which does not bind to DNA directly but regulates transcription by interacting with an enhancer or promoter region that regulates target genes.5-8 Nuclear receptor coactivator 2 also affects different physiological processes, including cell growth, energy metabolism, circadian rhythm, and feeding behavior.4-8 The expression of the NCOA2 gene plays a crucial role in the development, progression, and metastasis of many malignant tumors, such as prostate cancer. Amplification or overexpression of NCOA2 occurred in 8% of the patients with prostate cancer and up to 37% in patients with metastatic cancer.9 More importantly, patients with high expression of NCOA2 are more likely to relapse after androgen-deprivation therapy.10 Amplification or overexpression of the NCOA2 gene may play an important role in metastasis. In the present study, we investigated the role of NCOA2 in gastric cancer. Previous study had revealed that NCOA2, also known as SRC-2, is essential for the epithelial–mesenchymal transformation (EMT) in breast cancer cells.11 Yu et al 12 also reported that NCOA2 can inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer. The Wnt signaling pathway played an important role in the development of numerous human tumors, such as in gastric cancer,13-16 breast cancer,17 and melanoma.18-20 The Wnt pathway may also play a role in leukemia.21,22 Mutation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway induces EMT in normal cells and promotes proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of gastric cancer cells.23-27

In the present study, we investigate NOCA2 expression in the gastric cancer samples and relationship between expression of NOCA2 and clinicopathological factors of gastric cancer. We investigate that NOCA2 affects the biologic behaviors of gastric cancer cells and the underlying mechanisms.

Materials and Methods

Immunohistochemistry and Patient Samples Collection

Immunohistochemistry of tissues chips was carried out as previously described.26 Briefly, the tissue chips were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through a graded series of ethanol. Then, the chips were incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes to block endogenous peroxidase activity, followed by bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 10 minutes to block nonspecific binding. Next, the sections were incubated with rabbit anti-human NCOA2 antibody (Abcam) and diluted 200-fold in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; pH 7.6) with 1% BSA, at 4 °C overnight. An LSAB kit was used for staining and visualization by DAB affects counterstaining with hematoxylin.

The human gastric cancer tissue chips study was performed at the Shanghai Jiaotong University. One hundred gastric cancer tissues and normal gastric tissues were located away from the cancer and used as controls. The expression of NCOA2 in tissues is determined by the immunohistochemistry as follows: ≤5%, 5% to 25%, 26% to 50%, 51% to 75%, and ≥75% as positive cells value 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, and multiplied with the staining intensity of 0, 1, 2, or 3 to represent no staining, light yellow, yellow brown, or brown. The score <3 points indicates NCOA2-positive expression, and >3 points indicates NCOA2-negative expression. All patients with gastric cancer included in the present study had not been given any preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy or other therapy such as radiotherapy.

Cell Culture

The Hs-746T, SGC-7901, MKN-45, CRL-5822, AGS, CRL-5971, GES-1, MKN-28, and BGC-823 gastric cancer cell lines were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). The gastric cancer cells were adherent cells; the Hs-746T, SGC-7901, MKN-45, CRL-5822, CRL-5971, MKN-28, and BGC-823 were cultured in RPMI 1640 complete medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 U/mL penicillin and streptomycin and placed at 37 °C, 5% CO2, in an incubator with saturated humidity.

Lentivirus-Mediated Knockdown of Gastric Cancer Cell Lines

The negative control (NC) and short hairpin RNA knockdown of NCOA2 lentivirus were provided by Genechem Co Ltd. The 300-µL lentivirus particles (titer: >108 TU/mL), which were constructed by Genechem Co and carrying green fluorescence protein, infected MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells that were preplanted in 6-well plates with 40% cell confluence, with polybrene at a ratio of 1:1000. After 48 hours, the fluorescence was observed under a microscope. Then, puromycin was added to the culture solution at a ratio of 1:1000, and after continuing to culture for a period of time, all the cells that were successfully transfected with lentivirus particles were selected, the fluorescence was verified under the microscope, and then the cells were stably cultured and passaged to obtain a stable cell line.

Western Blot Analysis

Western blotting was carried as previously described.28-30 Briefly, an equal amount of protein was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 10% gel electrophoresis and transferred onto a 0.45-µm polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PALL). The membranes were blocked in 0.5% BSA at room temperature for 2 hours. The following monoclonal primary antibodies were used in the Western blot analysis: anti-NOCA2 (Abcam), anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (CST), anti-Slug (Abcam), anti-N-cad (Abcam), anti-E-cad (Abcam), anti-Vimentin (Abcam), anti-β-catenin (Abcam), and anti-TCF-8 (Abcam), overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were washed 3 times with TBST (0.1% Tween-20) for 10 minutes, each at room temperature. The signal was visualized by chemiluminescence kit.

Colony Formation Assay

Human gastric cancer cells MKN-28NC, MKN-28SH, GBC-823NC, and BGC-823SH in logarithmic growth phase were harvested. The cells were seeded onto 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 103 cells/well. These cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 complete medium containing 10% FBS in the incubator at 37 °C, 5% CO2, for 7 to 10 days. Then, methanol was used to fix cells for 10 minutes and crystal violet was used to stain the cells. Clones were read directly by the naked eye, and the number of clones larger than 10 cells were identified under a microscope (low magnification). Clone formation was calculated as: efficiency = (number of clones/number of cells inoculated) × 100%. The results represent the mean values from 3 independent experiments.

Cell Proliferation Assay

MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells cancer cells were planted in 96-well plates at a density of 1500 per well, 3 replicate per group. These cells were cultured in a 10% FBS medium in a 5% CO2, 37 °C incubator for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days. The culture medium was then discarded, 10% Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) was added in serum-free medium. Results were observed in a microplate reader after culture for 1 hour. Determination of absorbance was at 450 nm. The results represent the mean values from 3 independent experiments.

Cell Invasion Assay

Transwell chamber (Corning) and Matrigel-coated transwell chamber 8-µm and 24-well format were inserted into 24-well cell culture plates to measure migration and invasion. Cells with density 1 × 105 in 0.3 mL of serum-free medium were added in the upper chamber, while 800 µL of RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. Cells were cultured for 48 hours. Then, the cells with transwell chambers were fixed in methanol for 5 minutes and stained with crystal violet and counted in 3 random fields under microscope. The results represent the mean values from 3 independent experiments.

Flow Cytometry Apoptosis Experiment

MKN-28NC and BGC-823NC gastric cancer cells and MKN-28SH and BGC-823SH cells of the experimental group were detected for culture with trypsin solution to prepare a single-cell suspension. The cells were counted and seeded in a 24-well cell culture plate at 1.0 × 105 cells/well. The cells were cultured in a cell culture incubator at 37 °C (5% CO2, saturated humidity). After incubating for 48 hours in an incubator, the suspension cells were collected into a centrifuge tube, and the adherent cells were detected with trypsin without EDTA, collected together with the suspension cells, and centrifuged at 1200 r/min for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered serum (PBS). The cells were resuspended in 1× binding buffer and transferred to a 5-mL flow tube, centrifuged at 1200 r/min for 5 minute, discarded the supernatant. A 5-µL Annexin V-FITC reagent was added to the flow tube and mixed. Then 5-µL propidium iodide (PI) reagent was added into the tube, mix by shaking, and incubated for 10 to 15 minutes in the dark at room temperature. One blank control tube (ie, only cells, without any dye staining) and 2 single-dye adjustment compensation tubes (1 tube is only dyed with Annexin V-FITC dye, and the other tube is stained with PI dye only) were used as controls. Binding buffer (400 μL, 1×) was added to each tube. After resuspension, apoptotic cells in each group were detected by flow cytometry (to avoid fluorescence quenching, it should be detected at 1 hour after staining). Analysis of cells by flow cytometry revealed that cells were divided into 4 subgroups: live cells (low fluorescence intensity), early apoptotic cells (higher green fluorescence), advanced cells in apoptosis, and necrotic cells (green and red double fluorescence will appear). The results were analyzed using BD FACSDIVA Software/Cell Quest version 3.0 software. The cell survival rate, early apoptosis rate, middle and late apoptosis rate, and cell mortality were calculated. The experiment was repeated 3 times.

Animal Experiments

All mice used in the experiment were 4-week-old male nude mice purchased from the Institute of Zoology, Shanghai Academy of Sciences, China. All experiments were carried out according to the official recommendations of the Chinese Animal Community. Ten large culture dishes of MKN-28nc and MKN-28sh cells were cultured. Confluence cells were detached with trypsin for 5 minutes and centrifuged for 5 to 10 minutes, and the supernatant was discarded. The cells were washed repeatedly with PBS, centrifuged again, and the pellet was harvested. The PBS 100 µL (pH = 7.4) was added, uniformly mixed, and injected into the subcutaneous and intraperitoneal tissues of the nude mice (5 each group; 20 in total). After 30 days, the mice were killed by cervical displacement, and the subcutaneous growth and peritoneal metastasis and spread were observed and photographed.

Statistical Analysis

Mean ± standard deviation (x¯± s) indicates measurement data and statistical value calculation was done using GraphPad.Prism version 5.0-1 statistical software. Student t test was used to compare the mean of multiple samples, and tissue immunohistochemistry results were tested by χ2 test before and after cell treatment. All results were found statistically significant at P < .05.

Results and Discussion

The expression of NCOA2 in gastric cancer tissues is higher than that in normal tissues. Immunohistochemical staining of gastric cancer and adjacent tissues (Figure 1A-D) demonstrated that the expression of NCOA2 in tumor tissues is significantly higher than that of nontumor tissues, with patients with gastric cancer having of NOCA2 high expression (Figure 1E; P = .005). The patients with gastric cancer have high expression status of NCOA2. We further studied the relationship between the expression of NCOA2 and the pathological features of gastric cancer and found that the expression of NCOA2 is related to lymph node metastasis (P = .007), TNM stage (P = .027), as well as gender (P = .035). The expression of NCOA2 was not related to age, tumor size, and distant metastases (Table 1). The difference in gender is far beyond our expectation because although androgen deprivation is still the most commonly used treatment of prostate cancer, most patients die of castration resistance.31 Then, whether androgen deprivation therapy can be used for the treatment of gastric cancer and whether there will be a prostate cancer-like outcome in the later stage of the disease are our next questions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Degree of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 (NCOA2) protein expression in human gastric cancer tissues and paired normal gastric tissue determined by immunohistochemical staining. A, Strong positive expression of NCOA2 in gastric cancer. B, Weak NCOA2 expression is in gastric cancer. C, Negative expression of NCOA2 in gastric cancer tissues. D, Negative expression of NCOA2 in nontumor gastric mucosa. E, NCOA2 protein expression is significantly higher in the gastric cancer tissues than in the normal gastric tissues.

Table 1.

Relationship Between Expression of NCOA2 and Clinicopathological Factors of Gastric Cancer.a

Variables Number of cases NCOA2 immunostaining P
Positive, n = 63 Negative, n = 37
Gender
 Male 67 47 20 .035b
 Female 33 16 17
Age (years)
 ≥65 46 30 16 .672
 <65 54 33 21
Tumor differentiation
 Well to moderate 29 10 13 .430
 Poor 71 53 24
Lauren classification
 Intestinal 24 16 8 .670
 Diffuse 76 47 29
Tumor size
 ≤5 cm 51 33 18 .541
 >5 cm 49 30 19
T stage
 T1 + T2 36 19 17 .111
 T3 + T4 64 46 18
Lymph node metastasis
 Negative 37 17 20 .007b
 Positive 63 46 17
Distant metastasis
 Negative 77 46 31 .218
 Positive 23 17 6
TNM stage
 I + II 23 10 13 .027b
 II + IV 77 53 24

Abbreviation: NCOA2, nuclear receptor coactivator 2.

a Positive expression of NCOA2 includes all positive cases, such as weak and strong.

bP < .05.

Knockdown of the Expression of NCOA2 Can Inhibit the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway in the Gastric Cancer Cells

The expression of NCOA2 in human gastric cancer cells MKN-28 and BGC-823 was higher that of than other cell lines (Figure 2A). Therefore, MKN-28 and BGC-823 cell lines were used in next experiments. The NCOA2 small interfering RNA inhibited the expression of NCOA2 in MKN-28sh and BGC-823sh cells compared to MKN-28nc and BGC-823nc cells. The knockdown effect was confirmed by Western blotting (Figure 2B). To explore whether NCOA2 is essential for the EMT in gastric cancer cells, we also detected EMT-related proteins in gastric cancer cells by Western blotting. The levels of β-catenin, N-cad, Vim, and Slug proteins in MKN-28sh and BGC-823sh cells after inhibition of NCOA2 expression were significantly lower than those in the control group. In contrast, E-cad expression in the experimental group was higher than the control group (Figure 2C). These results indicate the functional role of NCOA2 in regulating EMT in gastric cancer cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Western blotting analyzed NCOA2 and Wnt/EMT signal pathway proteins expression. A, NCOA2 expression in 9 gastric cancer cell lines. B, After the knockdown of NCOA2 expression by lentivirus, the difference in protein content between the experimental group and the control group of the 2 gastric cancer cells was tested. C, After knockdown of NCOA2, difference in EMT marker proteins in experimental and control groups of gastric cancer cells. EMT indicates epithelial–mesenchymal transformation; NCOA2, nuclear receptor coactivator 2.

Knockdown of NCOA2 Can Suppress the Proliferation of Gastric Cancer Cells

The cancer MKN-28sh and BGC-823sh cell clusters with knockdown NCOA2 genes were significantly smaller than those of MKN-28nc and BGC-823nc cells. The proliferation ability was significantly lower than that of the control (Figure 3A). The CCK-8 assay analyzes cell proliferation ability. The results of plate cloning were identical to CCK-8 assay (Figure 3C). After knocking down NCOA2, the absorbance at 450 nm of MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells was significantly decreased, showing that cell proliferation was inhibited (P < .05; Figure 3D). These results also indicate the role of NCOA2 in the proliferation of gastric cancer cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Gastric cancer cell proliferation. A, Differences in MKN-28 and BGC-823 colony formation in NC and SH groups. B, The colony formation in SH group is lower than in the NC group in MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells. C, CCK-8 experiments on days 2 to 5 with MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells in both NC and SH groups. D, CCK-8 detected the ability of proliferation of MKN-28 and BGC-823 in both NC and SH groups for 1 to 5 days. CCK-8 indicates Cell Counting Kit-8; NC, negative control; NCOA2, nuclear receptor coactivator 2; SH, short hairpin RNA.

Knockdown of NCOA2 Expression Inhibits the Invasion Ability of Gastric Cancer Cells

MKN-28sh and BGC-823sh cells with knockdown NCOA2 expression had a lower number of cells penetrating the transwell cell membrane compared to MKN-28nc and BGC-823nc (Figure 4A and B; P < .05). Thus, the invasion ability of gastric cancer cells with stably knockdown of NCOA2 was significantly reduced.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Gastric cancer cells metastasis invasion assay. A, Knockdown of the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 (NCAO2) inhibited the invasion ability of MKN-28 cells. B, Knockdown of the expression of NCAO2 inhibited the invasion ability of BGC-823 cells. C, Quantification of the results from (A) and (B), respectively.

Knockdown of NCOA2 Expression Promotes Apoptosis of Gastric Cancer Cells

The apoptosis rate of MKN-28nc and BGC-823nc with NCOA2 expression was significantly lower than that of MKN-28sh and BGC-823sh cells after NCOA2 knockdown. Microscopically, knockdown of NCOA2 gene expression in gastric cancer cells simultaneously increased the number of early apoptosis (LR) and late-stage apoptosis (UR) cells in gastric cancer cells, thus more NCOA2 knockdown had a pronounced effect on early-stage apoptosis than late-stage apoptosis (Figure 5A and B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

FCM assay tested the apoptosis in knockdown of NCOA2 of gastric cancer cells. A, Knockdown of the expression of NCAO2 promotes the cells apoptosis of BGC-823 cells. B, Knockdown of the expression of NCAO2 promotes the cells apoptosis of MKN-28 cells. 188 × 97 mm (300 × 300 DPI). C, The quantity of apoptosis cells in SH group is larger than in NC group in BGC823 and MKN28 cells. FCM indicates flow cytometry; NC, negative control; NCOA2, nuclear receptor coactivator 2; SH, short hairpin RNA.

NCOA2 Knockdown Inhibited Subcutaneous Growth and Peritoneal Spread of Gastric Cancer Cells In Vivo

In order to confirm whether NCOA2 knockdown can suppress the proliferation of gastric cancer cells in vivo, we injected MKN-28nc and MKN-28sh cells subcutaneously and in the abdomen of nude mice. The cancer nodules in the peritoneal cavity of the mice inoculated with the control group MKN-28nc cells were significantly larger than those in the mice inoculated with the NCOA2 MKN-28sh cells (Figure 6A and B; P = .046 and <.05). The subcutaneous cancer nodules of the mice inoculated with the control group MKN-28nc cells were significantly larger than those of the mice inoculated with the NCOA2 MKN-28sh cells (Figure 6C and D).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Effect of NCOA2 on the growth and peritoneal metastasis of MKN-28 cells. A, Comparison of the number of cancer nodules of MKN-28 cells in peritoneal metastasis of mice in NC and SH groups of MKN-28 cells. B, Quantification of the results from (A). C, Comparison of MKN-28 groups subcutaneously in NC and SH groups of MKN-28 cells. D, Stated subcutaneous tumor of the MKN-28nc group. The MKN28-SH group had not tumor growth. NC indicates negative control; NCOA2, nuclear receptor coactivator 2; SH, short hairpin RNA.

In summary, NCOA2 plays an important role in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer. Knockdown of NCOA2 expression can not only inhibit the proliferation of gastric cancer cells but also weaken the survival of gastric cancer cells by promoting apoptosis, inhibiting metastasis and invasion via Wnt signaling pathway, affecting the progression of gastric cancer.

Abbreviations

BSA

bovine serum albumin

CCK-8

Cell Counting Kit-8

EMT

epithelial–mesenchymal transformation

FBS

fetal bovine serum

NCOA2

nuclear receptor coactivator 2

PBS

phosphate-buffered serum

PI

propidium iodide

TBS

Tris-buffered saline

NC

negative control.

Footnotes

Authors’ Note: Zhenlv Lin and Fang Yang contributed equally to this work. The data sets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, China (protocol number: IEC-FOM-008-2.0, B Lan).

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81702424 and 81872364), the Fujian Provincial Health Department Young and Middle-aged Talents Training Project (no. 2018-ZQN-46), the Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province (no. 2017Y9092), the Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation (no. 2018J05127), and the National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Project (General Surgery) of China.

References

  • 1. Correa P. Gastric cancer: overview. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42(2):211–217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hundahl SA, Phillips JL, Menck HR. The national cancer data base report on poor survival of U.S. gastric carcinoma patients treated with gastrectomy: Fifth edition American Joint Committee on cancer staging, proximal disease, and the “different disease” hypothesis. Cancer. 2000;88(4):921–932. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Picard F, Gehin M, Annicotte J, et al. SRC-1 and TIF2 control energy balance between white and brown adipose tissues. Cell. 2002;111(7):931–941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Stashi E, Lanz RB, Mao J, et al. SRC-2 is an essential coactivator for orchestrating metabolism and circadian rhythm. Cell Rep. 2014;6(4):633–645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chopra AR, Louet JF, Saha P, et al. Absence of the SRC-2 coactivator results in a glycogenopathy resembling von Gierke’s disease. Science. 2008;322(5906):1395–1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chopra AR, Kommagani R, Saha P, et al. Cellular energy depletion resets whole-body energy by promoting coactivator-mediated dietary fuel absorption. Cell Metab. 2011;13(1):35–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gehin M, Mark M, Dennefeld C, Dierich A, Gronemeyer H, Chambon P. The function of TIF2/GRIP1 in mouse reproduction is distinct from those of SRC-1 and p/CIP. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22(16):5923–5937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Reineke EL, York B, Stashi E, et al. SRC-2 coactivator deficiency decreases functional reserve in response to pressure overload of mouse heart. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e53395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Taylor BS, Schultz N, Hieronymus H, et al. Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 2010;18(1):11–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Agoulnik IU, Vaid A, Nakka M, et al. Androgens modulate expression of transcription intermediary factor 2, an androgen receptor coactivator whose expression level correlates with early biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66(21):10594–10602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Bozickovic O, Skartveit L, Engelsen AST, et al. A novel SRC-2-dependent regulation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;185:57–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Yu J, Wu WKK, Liang Q, et al. Disruption of NCOA2 by recurrent fusion with LACTB2 in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2016;35(2):187–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Clements WM, Wang J, Sarnaik A, et al. Beta-catenin mutation is a frequent cause of Wnt pathway activation in gastric cancer. Cancer Res. 2002;62(12):3503–3506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Satoh S, Daigo Y, Furukawa Y, et al. AXIN1 mutations in hepatocellular carcinomas, and growth suppression in cancer cells by virus-mediated transfer of AXIN1. Nature Genet. 2000;24(3):245–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Dahmen RP, Koch A, Denkhaus D, et al. Deletions of AXIN1, a component of the WNT/wingless pathway, in sporadic medulloblastomas. Cancer Res. 2001;61(19):7039–7043. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Segditsas S, Tomlinson I. Colorectal cancer and genetic alterations in the Wnt pathway. Oncogene. 2006;25(57):7531–7537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lin SY, Xia W, Wang JC, et al. Beta-catenin, a novel prognostic marker for breast cancer: its roles in cyclin D1 expression and cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(8):4262–4266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Delmas V, Beermann F, Martinozzi S, et al. Beta-catenin induces immortalization of melanocytes by suppressing p16INK4a expression and cooperates with N-Ras in melanoma development. Genes Dev. 2007;21(22):2923–2935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Juan J, Muraguchi T, Iezza G, Sears RC, McMahon M. Diminished WNT -> beta-catenin -> c-MYC signaling is a barrier for malignant progression of BRAFV600E-induced lung tumors. Genes Dev. 2014;28(6):561–575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Pawlikowski JS, McBryan T, van Tuyn J, et al. Wnt signaling potentiates nevogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(40):16009–16014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Luis TC, Ichii M, Brugman MH, Kincade P, Staal FJ. Wnt signaling strength regulates normal hematopoiesis and its deregulation is involved in leukemia development. Leukemia. 2012;26(3):414–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lento W, Congdon K, Voermans C, Kritzik M, Reya T. Wnt signaling in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(2):a008011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Qu Y, Ray PS, Li J, et al. High levels of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 correlate with poor prognosis and promote tumourigenesis in gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(17):3718–3728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zha L, Zhang J, Tang W, et al. HMGA2 elicits EMT by activating the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in gastric cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(3):724–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(6):1420–1428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Savagner P. The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenomenon. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(suppl 7):vii89–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009;139(5):871–890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lan B, Zhang J, Shan J, et al. Downregulation of CRKL expression can inhibit tumorigenesis in colon cancer. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2014;19:528–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lu D, Lan B, Din Z, Chen H, Chen G. A vitamin D receptor agonist converts CD4+ T cells to Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in patients with ulcerative colitis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(32):53552–53562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Lan B, Zhang J, Zhang P, et al. Metformin suppresses CRC growth by inducing apoptosis via ADORA1. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2017;22:248–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Walsh PC, DeWeese TL, Eisenberger MA. Clinical practice. Localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(26):2696–2705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES