Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2020 May 5;12(5):e7975. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7975

A Rare Case of Incidental Urachal Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma

Jack Komro 1, Dawood Findakly 2,✉
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC7273399  PMID: 32523832

Abstract

The urachus is a remnant of the embryonic allantois that connects the urinary bladder to the umbilicus. In most cases, it commonly obliterates before birth. Here we present the case of a 60-year-old man with a past medical history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and anal human papillomavirus (HPV). He was referred for an abdominal mass that had been found incidentally while being admitted for an acute kidney injury; it had been excised, and pathological examination showed urachal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Surgical excision is performed for the majority of cases with a higher survival rate when diagnosed early.

Keywords: urachus, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, bladder, ultrasonography, computed tomography, rare cancers

Introduction

The urachus is an embryonic allantois duct remnant that attaches the urinary bladder dome to the umbilicus, and it should be obliterated during late-stage gestation. Failure to be obliterated is not uncommon. Thus, if it persists to adult life, a primary urachal cancer (UC) can arise. UC was first described by Hue and Jacquin in 1863. It is rare and typically presents at an advanced stage and has poor outcomes [1]. Hematuria is the most common manifestation in more than 90% of patients, and surgery is the gold standard method for its treatment [2,3]. At the time of diagnosis, approximately 50% of patients have advance stage leading to poor prognosis, and this is due to late presentation [4]. Here we present the case of a 60-year-old man with a past medical history of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and anal human papillomavirus (HPV) who was referred for an abdominal mass that had been found incidentally. He had undergone an elective partial cystectomy, and the subsequent pathological examination showed urachal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old man with a past medical history of HIV and anal HPV was referred from his primary care provider to the urology office for an abdominal mass that was found incidentally upon abdominal ultrasound (US) after being admitted to the hospital for an acute kidney injury from dehydration. The patient denied any weight loss, abdominal pain, umbilical discharge, hematuria, or voiding difficulties. He is a former tobacco smoker with a 15-pack-year smoking history and has a history of alcohol abuse. Upon presentation, his vital signs and physical examination were unremarkable. Labs were also unremarkable, and his urinalysis was pertinent for a urine pH of 6 with minimal proteinuria and microscopic hematuria. A retroperitoneal US showed a 7.0-cm midline pelvic mass located just superior to the urinary bladder (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Retroperitoneal ultrasound demonstrating the pelvic mass located just superior to the urinary bladder (yellow arrow).

Figure 1

We performed a subsequent CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis, which demonstrated a 7.3-cm multiseptate anterior bladder wall lesion (Figure 2). 

Figure 2. Contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrating the multiseptated cystic mass measuring 6.4 x 7.3 x 7.0 cm in anteroposterior, craniocaudal, and transverse dimensions, which contains multiple thickened, enhancing septations and eccentric wall thickening. This mass is abutting, but not infiltrating the adjacent large bowel wall, and there is a clear fat plane between the anterior aspect of the mass and the inner surface of the lower central abdominal wall.

Figure 2

(A) Sagittal plane (green arrow). (B) Axial plane (red arrow).

The patient underwent cystoscopy, which ruled out a bladder mass, diverticulum, inflammation, or stones and concluded a mass effect on the anterior bladder wall from a suspected urachal mass with no communication between the mass and the urinary bladder. Eventually, the patient underwent an elective open excision of the lesion which was found to be a sizeable urachal cyst. Because of the adherent nature of the mass to the surrounding tissue, the procedure was combined with partial cystectomy. A pathological examination from the tissue taken from the urachal cyst showed mucinous cystadenocarcinoma favoring urachal origin (Figure 3). The patient was, therefore, diagnosed with Sheldon stage I, Mayo stage I, and T1N0M0 urachal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. He is doing well and is disease-free at follow-up 10 months after the diagnosis.

Figure 3. Tumor sections showing urachal carcinoma with abundant mucin filling most of the cystic spaces and occasionally dissecting into the stroma with focal dysplastic epithelium floating the mucin pools, diagnostic of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma.

Figure 3

(A) H&E, x40. (B) H&E, x200.

Discussion

Bladder cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide [5]. UC, however, is exceedingly rare and accounts for less than !% of all bladder cancers with an incidence of one case per million per year [6-8]. UC was first described by Hue and Jacquin in 1863. It is a rare cancer that typically presents at an advanced stage and has poor outcomes [9]. 

The most common demographic is white men over the age of 50 years [6,8,10]. A number of studies have previously described histopathological characteristics. Adenocarcinoma is the most common type of UC, usually having non-cystic and mucinous features [6,8,11]. Given the rarity of UC, relatively few studies have described its characteristics. Increase awareness of it is beneficial to provide a brief overview of the current literature regarding presenting symptoms, diagnosis, staging, and treatment. The most common presenting symptom is macroscopic or microscopic hematuria with multiple less common symptoms such as abdominal pain and mucousuria, among others [10,11]. Cystoscopy, CT, and MRI are the primary diagnostic imaging modalities [10,12]. 

Diagnostic criteria have been modified over time, but the most accepted criteria, according to Hamilou et al., are described by Sheldon et al. in 1984 and Mostofi et al. in 1955 [10,13,14]. The most common location of UC is at the bladder dome. Multiple staging systems are used as the classic TNM staging is not as useful for UC. There is also a higher survival rate with early stages and surgical excision. The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of UC is not well established, although 5-fluorouracil is commonly used. Overall, there is no effective management strategy, and partial cystectomy remains the primary therapeutic option [6,7,10,11]. 

The unique clinical aspect of our patient is the mucinous cystadenocarcinoma diagnosis, a less common UC type with only 10 cases reported in the literature. Our patient was identified early with a Sheldon stage I, Mayo stage I, and T1N0M0, which was discovered incidentally on the abdominal US, treated with open excision of the lesion with partial cystectomy and remains disease-free at a 10-month follow-up. 

Conclusions

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma is a rare and aggressive type of UC. Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial in improving patient outcomes. There are no definitive connotative strategies in assessing patients for the presence of UC. Our patient is the 11th case of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma to be published in the literature. This report will help improve our understanding and guide future endeavors in the management of this rare tumor.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Urachal papillary cystadenocarcinoma: a rare case report. Mardi K, Gupta N. J Cancer Res Ther. 2011;7:223–225. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.82934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Primary urachal mucinous adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder. Singh I, Prasad R. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:911–913. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5597.2973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Urachal adenocarcinoma: a rare case report. Bao B, Hatem M, Wong JK. Radiol Case Rep. 2016;12:65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2016.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Akamatsu S, Takahashi A, Ito M, Ogura K. Urology. 2010;75:615–618. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Epidemiology of bladder cancer: a systematic review and contemporary update of risk factors in 2018. Cumberbatch MGK, Jubber I, Black PC, et al. Eur Urol. 2018;74:784–795. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Malignant urachal neoplasms: a population-based study and systematic review of literature. Mylonas KS, O'Malley P, Ziogas IA, El-Kabab L, Nasioudis D. Urol Oncol. 2017;35:0–33. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Urachal carcinoma: a pathologic and clinical study of 46 cases. Dhillon J, Liang Y, Kamat AM, et al. Hum Pathol. 2015;46:1808–1814. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Biomarkers in urachal cancer and adenocarcinomas in the bladder: a comprehensive review supplemented by own data. Reis H, Krafft U, Niedworok C, et al. Dis Markers. 2018;2018:7308168. doi: 10.1155/2018/7308168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Colloid cancer of the anterior abdominal lombille and having invaded the bladder wall. (Article in French) Hue L, Jacquin M. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10010736898/ Union Med de la Siene Inf Rouen. 1863;6:418. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Management of urachal cancer: a review by the Canadian Urological Association and Genitourinary Medical Oncologists of Canada. Hamilou Z, North S, Canil C, et al. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;14:57–64. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Urachal cancer—current concepts of a rare cancer. Reis H, Szarvas T. Pathologe. 2019;40:31–39. doi: 10.1007/s00292-018-0516-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Computed tomographic appearance of urachal carcinoma associated with urachal diverticulum misdiagnosed by cystoscopy. Machida H, Ueno E, Nakazawa H, Fujimura M, Kihara T. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:363–366. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9256-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Malignant urachal lesions. Sheldon CA, Clayman RV, Gonzalez R, Williams RD, Fraley EE. J Urol. 1984;131:1–8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50167-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mucous adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder. Mostofi FK, Thomson RV, Dean AL Jr. Cancer. 1955;8:741–758. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1955)8:4<741::aid-cncr2820080417>3.0.co;2-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES