Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0232392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232392

Effect of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of elementary school boys and girls during physical education classes: A cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment

Alexandro Andrade 1,*, Whyllerton Mayron da Cruz 1, Clara Knierim Correia 2, Ana Luiza Goya Santos 1, Guilherme Guimarães Bevilacqua 1
Editor: Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero3
PMCID: PMC7274370  PMID: 32502164

Abstract

Reduced physical exercise can impact children’s mental health. Use of active electronic games can help promote psychological health. Physical education (PE class) uses different resources, methods, and contents to promote student health. We investigated the effect of exergames on the mood and self-esteem of children and compare it that of with traditional PE classes. From a sample of 213 children (7–11 years old), 140 from 10 classes of the fourth and fifth grades of elementary school (59 boys, 81 girls; mean age 9.41±0.48 years), allocated to an experimental group (EG; n = 68; five clusters) and a PE group (PE; n = 72; five clusters), participated in this experimental controlled study. The EG practiced exergames during three 40-minute classes, and the PE group held three routine curricular PE classes. Brunel’s Mood Scale and Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale were applied. Repeated measures ANOVA identified differences between sexes and groups. The main results of the EG demonstrated reduced tension in girls (p <0.05; ES: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.17–1.05). Regarding sex comparisons, anger was lower in girls (F: 4.57; p <0.05; ES: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.11–1.11) in the EG. Vigor was higher in girls in the EG than in those in the PE group (F: 5.46; p <0.05; ES: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.12–1.01). The main results of the PE group indicated increased self-esteem in boys (p <0.05; ES: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.08–1.07) and reduction of girls’ mental confusion (p <0.05; ES 0.58; 95% CI 0.15–1.06). Thus, exergames impact boys’ and girls’ self-esteem and mood, as well as traditional physical education classes. Further study on exergames in schools is essential, with long-term effects on physical and mental health. Exergames bring interesting, varied content, technology, and innovation that can increase the attractiveness of physical education.

Introduction

Physical inactivity is a topic of worldwide concern and has been increasing in many countries. The current reality of an increasingly inactive or sedentary populous results in health problems such as hypertension, heart issues, and psychological disorders [13]. In part, this is due to limited time and opportunities for physical activity, ease of Internet access, and increased time spent using smartphones, in front of the television, or in sedentary video games, mainly manifesting in children and teenagers [4,5].

Especially in children, the impact of early inclusion into digital electronic activities has sparked interest in research on learning, sleep, and the relationship between these electronic activities and their effect on well-being and mental health [69]. Despite the negative effects, it has recently become possible to observe the potential benefits that technology can have on mental health and the involvement of physical activity [1013].

It is remarkable that physical activity habits are an important component of a healthy lifestyle and health promotion [14]. In this perspective, the time that children spend in school becomes a key factor to raise awareness and opportunity to practice physical activity. Thus, school physical education, as a curricular discipline, can contribute considerably to the increase in desired daily physical activity and aim to positively affect physical and psychological health. The classes, in addition to traditional content (e.g., games, sports, dancing, fighting) and the use of new methodologies, can make physical activity much more attractive to young people and children [15].

In this context, the use of cyberspace combined with traditional contents of physical education at school has been used as an educational tool. Some studies seek to identify the impact of technologies within physical education classes. In addition to being more attractive and motivating, cyberspace contributes to students’ involvement in physical activities during classes [1619].

In this sense, active videogames are considered game modalities that seem to be suitable for both boys and girls because they combine fun with the use of technology, contributing several physical and psychological benefits [20,21]. Known as exergames, this class of active games has recently taken a prominent role as technological devices designed to increase physical activity and promote physical and mental health [22,23]. In recent years, these types of games have demonstrated their ability to improve physical fitness and to reduce body mass index [24,25].

Recently, some experimental studies using exergames in non-school settings have shown positive effects on the health of children and adolescents [17,2628]. Specifically, on effects on mental health, other studies have shown improvement in body image [29], psychological well-being [3032], and self-efficacy [18]. The implications related to psychological health also indicate improvements in self-esteem [33,34] and mood states [16].

Despite the above, studies addressing active games in curriculum proposals and addressing mental health issues within the school environment are scarce [35]. Experimental studies using exergames outside the school environment have low ecological validity, and the few integrated studies performed as a physical education component were performed only in one session [22]. These situations reflect controversial results with low reproducibility. Randomized experiments performed with exergames in the school environment are still rare [19,21], making the results even more inconclusive [10].

Mood studies have been developed in the sports and education sciences, in general, proving moods as an important variable in performance, health, and education [22,3638]. It is necessary to investigate the psychological effects of different innovative methods during physical education classes at school because when considering the diversity of resources and methods such as exergames, it can present results that are still little known or not fully understood. The chronic and acute effects of physical education practice have been demonstrated in several experimental studies [3941]. However, there is a lack of experiments with exergames and children in schools. We are aware that the practice of physical education has acute effects on physical and mental health [20,28,42]. It is important to know whether exergames also significantly alter the mental health of children. Acute effects on mood and self-esteem, for example, can have a positive impact on many aspects of a child’s life with consequences for school performance.

Our study investigated whether exergames influenced the mood and self-esteem of children at school, whether there would be an acute effect of this practice, and whether there would be differences between the sexes and between groups. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if the practice of exergames would have acute effects on mood and self-esteem of children during school physical education classes and, in addition, to compare the effects of the practice of exergames with routine curricular physical education classes. Thus, our study is based on two hypotheses. First, there are differences between boys and girls regarding moods and self-esteem when practicing exergames in school physical education compared to that in traditional classes. Another hypothesis is that there are differences between boys and girls.

Materials and methods

This is a cluster-randomized natural experimental study and controlled with two groups [40,43] comparing the acute effects of exergame practice and routine curricular physical education classes.

Participants

All participants belonged to a private elementary school localized in urban and central part of Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil. The school was selected for having qualified teachers and for being one of the largest and most structured schools with ideal facilities for applying exergames and for offering twice a week physical education classes lasting 40 minutes each. Regarding socioeconomic status, approximately 75% of children were from families with medium to high socioeconomic status and 25% were scholarship students from lower social classes.

This study is innovative because it is characterized as a natural experiment [40,4345] and with high ecological validity [28,38,46]. An experimental design with parallel groups was followed in this study.

In the school investigated, the adopted teaching system is subdivided by class, in which case, the randomization by subjects became unfeasible. Cluster design was a strategy used to minimize confounding effects and other biases in the educational context, so class randomization was performed [47].

This study was conducted during the school term (May of 2018) with children from 10 different classes (clusters). The number of students per class ranged from 20 to 25 students.

A sample of 213 children aged 7–11 years were invited to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria were: (a) to be regularly enrolled in school; (b) not have any physical, cognitive, or mental disability, according to the student’s existing records at school; and (c) have no commitment that would prevent him from responding to the instruments. Of the total, 15 children were not present on the day of study presentation, four did not meet the participants’ inclusion criteria, and seven were excluded for other reasons. Overall, there was an effective participation rate of 65.73% of eligible children who performed all the procedures required in this experiment. When analyzed between groups, the participation rate was greater than 70% (Fig 1). In terms of percentage, the participation in our study can be considered moderate to high compared with other studies with the theme of exergames in the school context, as the participation rates of similarly themed published studies have varied between 18 and 97% [48]. This reduction in participation rate was due to the absence of students due to illness, travel, or late arrivals during the sessions. In research conducted in educational contexts, this sample loss is considered acceptable due to school routines. Despite all the peculiarities related to sample loss and participation rate, considering the school context is essential for the success of a physical activity program, whether long or short term [10,48].

Fig 1. CONSORT flow chart of clusters and participants within the study (Group intervention—EG and control group—PE group).

Fig 1

EG, experimental group; PE, physical education.

Finally, 187 children were allocated to the exergames (EG; n = 96) and control (PE group; n = 91) groups. Of these, 42 were not authorized by their parents or guardians and five did not agree to participate in the interventions. Thus, 68 children (26 boys and 42 girls) in the EG group and 72 children (33 boys and 39 girls) in the PE group were part of the final analysis, totaling 140 children (59 boys and 81 girls, average age 9.41 ± 0.48 years) (Fig 1).

All children who were not included in the study participated in the physical education classes programmed by the school or performed the practice of exergames as pedagogical content after the study ended.

A sample calculation was performed to determine the minimum sample size of participants. A power analysis [49] indicated a minimum of 112 participants are required to compose the appropriate total sample (α = 0.05 and β = 0.95) to identify differences between groups and outcomes. In this controlled experiment, our sample exceeded by more than 20% the number required to perform the appropriate statistical procedures.

Data collection procedures

The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the State University of Santa Catarina (Opinion No. 2.690.067/2018). Before data collection, a pilot study was carried out with ten children in the age group of the present study, to verify the level of understanding of the instruments by the participants and to verify that the children would not respond randomly. In a second step, the children who participated in the study received detailed instructions on how to complete the instruments. In addition, during the time designated for completion of the instruments, two researchers remained in the classroom to clarify issues and fill any gaps in the procedural recall and understanding needed for proper completion of the instruments. We identified in this pilot study that the children were able to concentrate without any distraction that would hinder the progress of the research.

All children who agreed to participate in the study also obtained parental or guardian consent by the date of the first collection. After agreeing to participate in the study and submitting the consent form with parent/guardian consent, the children performed the first assessment. This initial assessment was called baseline, consisting of instruments related to demographic, anthropometric characteristics, mood, and self-esteem.

All procedures for both data collection and intervention took place at the school where the interventions were performed. The children were evaluated in rooms equipped with chairs and tables and performed individually without interference from any other participant. All children received the support of responsible researchers while filling out the instruments.

The EG performed exergame sessions during physical education classes, and the acute effect was evaluated immediately after the third session (totaling 120 minutes). The physical education group performed its routine curricular physical education classes proposed by the school (totaling 120 minutes), and the acute effect was evaluated immediately after the third class. For both groups, interventions occurred on days apart (e.g., first session: Monday; second session: Wednesday; and third session: Monday again or first session: Tuesday; second session Thursday and third session: Tuesday again).

Experimental protocol

Exergame sessions

In this natural experiment, both the application of the experimental protocol and the routine physical education classes took place in the reality of classes at school. This protocol was similar to another study involving the practice of exergames and conducted in a school environment [16]. A trained teacher taught classes with exergames for the EG. The classroom was equipped with a Kinect® XBOX console (Microsoft, Redmond, WA USA), which allowed up to four students to play simultaneously (Score Subgroup) and each subgroup commanded the game at least twice during the session; the applied game was Just Dance 2015® (Ubisoft Entertainment, SA, Montreuil, France). In addition, this game enabled all students involved (NO Score Subgroup) to participate actively without, however, being in control of the Kinect® functions. Each session lasted 40 minutes and was subdivided into four steps consisting of: (i) brief guidance to familiarize participants with session procedures of the exergames. These instructions were standardized for all classes involved in the study; (ii) activation and seeding with random music available in the game; (iii) performing the required tasks and rotating the subgroups as the song ends; and (iv) cooling down.

Physical education classes

The physical education classes have targeted the development of basic motor skills and physical activity using play, games, and sports. During classes, the teachers made adaptations in their traditional teaching approach. These adaptations were mixed with cooperative and competitive activities that simulate sports with playful approaches, for example, shooting at a distant target, simulating basketball, handball, or soccer. All activities offered in physical education classes were planned considering the age, ability level, and previous ability of the students.

Furthermore, consisted of regular activities previously chosen by the class teachers without any interference from the researchers. The classes lasted 40 minutes and were subdivided into four steps: (i) warm-up, (ii) development of technical physical skills, (iii) sports games adapted for children, and (iv) cooling down.

Measures

Sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics

Demographic information (age and sex) was obtained using a questionnaire and was answered by the children themselves. At the time of the evaluations, teachers and researchers were present to guide the participants. Anthropometric data were verified by body mass (in kg) and height (in meters) using a digital scale with stadiometer (Model Filizola PL 200 kg [Goiânia, Brazil], calibrated and certified by The National Institute of Metrology, Standardization and Industrial Quality [INMETRO], Brazil). Each child was measured and weighed in an appropriate place in the physical education room.

Brunel mood scale

The instrument used to assess mood was the Brunel Mood Scale. Studies with children used this instrument to verify the effect of exergames on children in the school environment [16, 21]. The instrument is a Likert-type scale composed of 24 items with five response options, ranging from nothing (0), slightly (1), moderately (2), quite (3), to extremely (4). The participant chooses the option that best fits at that moment. The Brunel Mood Scale evaluates six mood dimensions, classified into psychological (mood depression, anger, and mental confusion) and psychosomatic (fatigue, tension, and vigor) (Table 1). The score of each dimension ranges from 0 to 16 points, where the higher the score, the larger the dimension. A pilot study was performed to identify Cronbach’s α (alpha) value. Considering our population (i.e., Brazilian children in a school environment), the result revealed that BRUMS is a reliable instrument to measure the six domains of mood state in children (α = 0.781) [50].

Table 1. Variables and definitions*.
Variables Definition
Tension State of musculoskeletal tension and worry
Depression Emotional state of despondency, sadness, and unhappiness
Anger State of hostility towards others
Vigor Sate of energy and physical stamina
Fatigue State of tiredness or low energy
Mental confusion State of light-headedness and instability
Self-esteem A feeling of self-appreciation

*Source: Brandt et al. [37], Brandt, Bevilacqua, Andrade [38]. Adaptations are themselves works protected by copyright.

Rosenberg self-esteem scale

The instrument used in this study was the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale [51]. This is a one-dimensional measure consisting of ten statements related to a set of feelings of self-esteem and self-acceptance that assess overall self-esteem. The measure of self-esteem allows a total score ranging from 10 to 40, increasing in function of the level of self-esteem. Its definition is described in Table 1. All items were submitted to the process of cross-cultural adaptation and validation, and in this study the version adapted for the Portuguese language was used [52]. Isomaa et al. (2013) suggest a cutoff of 25 for classifying low self-esteem in girls and boys [53]. Items are answered on a four-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree, agree, disagree, and strongly disagree.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and frequencies) were used to identify the general characteristics of the participants. Data normality was verified by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. First, an exploratory analysis was performed comparing the sexes (boys vs. boys, girls vs. girls, and boys vs. girls) and conditions (EG exergames vs. PE classes). For intragroup comparisons (pre- and post-acute effect) the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used and for intergroup comparisons (sex and condition) the Mann-Whitney U test was used.

A two-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used for verifying the differences in mood states and self-esteem by sex and group factors. When the MANOVA detected significant differences, two two-way repeated measures ANOVAs with post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed. One for comparisons between the groups (EG exergames and PE classes) within each sex (boys and girls). Therefore, the dependent variables were the six domains of mood state (anger, fatigue, mental confusion, depression, vigor, and tension) and self-esteem. Time (pre- and post-intervention) was considered a within-subject factor and group (EG exergames and PE classes) was considered a between-subject factor. The second two-way repeated measures ANOVA corresponds to comparisons between sexes (boys and girls) within each group (EG exergames and PE classes). In this case, the dependent variables were the six domains of mood state (anger, fatigue, mental confusion, depression, vigor, and tension) and self-esteem. Time (pre- and post-intervention) was considered a within-subject factor and sex (boys and girls) was considered a between-subject factor.

To verify the magnitude of intra- and intergroup changes, the effect size proposed by Cohen (1988) was calculated. Considering the criteria, Cohen’s d values were between 0.2 and 0.5 = small effect, between 0.5 and 0.8 = moderate effect, and ≥ 0.8 = large effect [54].

All statistical procedures were performed using SPSS software (version 20.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY USA). The significance level adopted was p <0.05.

Results

Regarding internet access in terms of daily hours, the average was higher in boys than in girls from the PE group (p<0.05). In both groups, the average number of hours of dedication to video games per day was higher for boys than for girls (p<0.05) (Table 2). Regarding sports practice across the sample (n = 140), most children (87.1%) played sports in addition to PE classes. Among the boys in the EG group, 96.2% played sports in addition to PE, while in the PE group 87.9% played. Among girls, 84% of the EG group and 87.2% of the PE group engaged in activities other than PE.

Table 2. Description of the anthropometric characteristics of the sample (EG and PE group) and comparison regarding the use of video games and internet access (hours per day) between boys and girls.

Variables Whole Sample (n = 140) EG (n = 68) PE group (n = 72)
Boys (n = 26) Girls (n = 42) p value Boys (n = 33) Girls (n = 39) p value
Age (Years) 9.41 (0.48) 8.77 (0.58) 8.88 (0.39) 0.44 9.46 (0.77) 9.38 (0.62) 0.30
Weight (kg) 35.40 (8.30) 33.39 (7.54) 33.82 (7.52) 0.65 38.81(9.06) 35.31 (8.23) 0.11
Height (m) 1.38 (0.67) 1.34 (0.62) 1.35 (0.50) 0.93 1,42 (0.55) 1.39 (0.71) 0.04
BMI (kg/m2) 18.37 (3.14) 18.21 (3.06) 18.38 (2.99) 0.55 19.00 (3.81) 17.92(2.72) 0.31
V.G (h/day) 0.90 (1.80) 2.30 (2.90) 0.36 (0.66) <0.01 1.31 (2.07) 0.29 (0.68) <0.01
Int. A. (h/day) 1.99 (2.21) 3.14 (3.80) 1.43 (1.30) 0.06 2.54 (2.25) 1.52 (1.29) 0.01

Abbreviations: EG = experimental group; PE = physical education; BMI = body mass index; V.G = Video game; Int. A. = Internet access.

Table 3 presents the results (mean and standard deviation [SD]) of the six domains of mood states and the self-esteem scores of the respective groups (EG exergames and PE classes) subdivided by sex (boys and girls), pre- and post-intervention. The definitions of each variable are presented in Table 1. There were only significant group effects (two-way MANOVA: Wilks’ λ (lambda) = 0.85; F[7,130] = 3.20; p = 0.004; η2 = 0.15) on mood states and self-esteem.

Table 3. Description (mean and standard deviation [SD]) of the six domains of mood states and self-esteem.

Variables Exergames Mean (SD) PE classes Mean (SD)
Boys (n = 26) Girls (n = 42) Boys (n = 33) Girls (n = 39)
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
Mood States
 Tension 3.73 (2.55) 2.42 (2.35) 3.00 (2.67) 1.76 (2.01) 2.30 (1.99) 1.45 (1.97) 2.77 (2.42) 1.64 (1.59)
 Depression 0.42 (0.94) 0.65 (1.81) 0.53 (1.97) 0.26 (0.76) 0.48 (1.12) 0.12 (0.41) 0.46 (0.96) 0.21 (0.46)
 Anger 0.88 (1.68) 1.23 (2.40) 0.42 (1.75) 0.21 (0.97) 0.70 (1.89) 0.24 (0.96) 0.62 (1.29) 0.23 (0.58)
 Vigor 9.73 (3.35) 10.73 (2.89) 9.77 (3.27) 10.21 (3.23) 9.18 (2.87) 9.33 (3.12) 9.18 (2.66) 8.46 (2.98)
 Fatigue 1.62 (2.38) 1.42 (1.74) 0.93 (2.23) 1.69 (2.85) 1.94 (2.93) 0.73 (1.84) 1.85 (2.21) 1.31 (2.19)
 Mental confusion 1.19 (1.41) 0.88 (1.36) 1.43 (2.03) 0.74 (1.86) 1.06 (1.39) 0.55 (1.60) 1.95 (1.91) 1.08 (1.42)
Self-esteem
 Score 32.38 (3.92) 32.73 (3.53) 31.88 (4.53) 33.45 (4.29) 32.55 (3.50) 34.58 (4.46) 32.33 (3.32) 33.74 (4.29)

Analysis of mood states and self-esteem in boys

A repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated time effects on mental confusion (F[1,57] = 5.51, p = 0.02), tension (F[1,57] = 17.37, p <0.01), and self-esteem (F[1,57] = 6.40; p = 0.01) (Table 4). After three sessions, the tension presented significant differences between the groups (F[1,57] = 5.38; p = 0.02), with tension being higher among boys who practiced exergames compared to the PE group (mean ± SD: 2.42 ± 2.35 vs. 1.45 ± 1.97).

Table 4. Analysis of variance of repeated measures on mood states and self-esteem among boys.

Vigor Depression Anger Fatigue Mental confusion Tension Self-esteem
F p F p F p F p F p F p F p
Time 1.91 0.17 0.11 0.74 0.04 0.84 3.84 0.05 5.51 0.02 17.37 <0.01 6.40 0.01
Time x playing EG 1.03 0.31 2.18 0.14 2.21 0.14 2.02 0.16 0.35 0.55 0.78 0.37 3.21 0.07
Exergames x PE group 1.93 0.17 1.11 0.29 2.38 0.12 0.17 0.70 0.48 0.48 5.38 0.02 1.50 0.22

Analysis of mood states and self-esteem in girls

Among girls, the effect of time on mental confusion (F[1,77] = 13.01; p <0.01), tension (F[1,77] = 19.67; p <0.01), and self-esteem score (F[1,79] = 20.59; p <0.01) was verified (Table 5). The repeated measures ANOVA identified interactions between time and groups for fatigue (F[1,77] = 5.26; p = 0.02). After three sessions, girls from the EG showed superior results for vigor than those from the PE group (mean ± SD: 10.21 ± 3.23 vs. 8.46 ± 2.98; F[1,77] = 5.46; p = 0.02).

Table 5. Repeated measures analysis of variance on mood and self-esteem in girls.

Vigor Depression Anger Fatigue Mental confusion Tension Self-esteem
F p F P F p F p F p F p F p
Time 0.01 0.93 2.84 0.96 3.77 0.05 0.11 0.73 13.01 <0.01 19.67 <0.01 20.59 <0.01
Time x playing EG 2.84 0.09 0.01 0.89 0.37 0.54 5.26 0.02 0.15 0.69 0.08 0.92 0.06 0.80
Exergames x PE group 5.46 0.02 0.04 0.84 0.17 0.67 0.39 0.53 1.56 0.21 0.23 0.63 0.18 0.66

Analysis of mood states and self-esteem in the EG group

Regarding sex comparisons in the EG exergames group, there was an effect of time on mental confusion (F[1,64] = 4.61; p = 0.03), tension (F[1,64] = 20.22; p <0.01), and self-esteem score (F[1,66] = 4.23, p = 0.04). After three sessions of exergames, boys had higher levels of anger than girls (mean; SD: 1.23 ± 2.40 vs 0.21 ± 0.97; F[1,64] = 4.57; p = 0.03) (Table 6).

Table 6. Repeated measures analysis of variance on mood states and self-esteem in the EG group.

Vigor Depression Anger Fatigue Mental confusion Tension Self-esteem
F p F P F p F p F p F p F p
Time 3.19 0.08 0.02 0.89 0.08 0.78 0.65 0.42 4.61 0.03 20.22 <0.01 4.23 0.04
Time x Sex 0.14 0.70 1.20 0.27 1.01 0.29 1.94 0.17 0.70 0.40 0.06 0.82 1.79 0.18
Boys x Girls 0.03 0.84 0.33 0.56 4.57 0.03 0.21 0.65 <0.01 0.92 1.51 0.22 0.13 0.71

Analysis of mood states and self-esteem in the PE group

Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated time effects on most domains of mood, depression (F[1,70] = 7.39; p <0.01), anger (F[1,70] = 8.52; p <0.01), fatigue (F[1,70] = 8.49; p <0.01), mental confusion (F[1,70] = 14.27; p <0.01) and tension (F[1,70] = 15.06; p <0.01) in addition to self-esteem (F[1,70] = 27.71; p <0.01). After three routine curricular physical education classes, boys had lower scores for mental confusion than girls (mean ± SD: 0.55 ± 1.60 vs. 1.08 ± 1.42; F[1,70] = 4.56; p = 0.03) (Table 7).

Table 7. Repeated measures analysis of variance on mood states and self-esteem in the PE group.

Vigor Depression Anger Fatigue Mental confusion Tension Self-esteem
F p F P F p F p F p F p F p
Time 0.56 0.45 7.39 <0.01 8.52 <0.01 8.49 <0.01 14.27 <0.01 15.06 <0.01 27.71 <0.01
Time x sex 1.32 0.25 0.22 0.64 0.05 0.80 1.25 0.26 0.94 0.33 0.30 0.58 0.90 0.34
Boys x Girls 057 0.45 0.03 0.84 0.03 0.85 0.28 0.59 4.56 0.03 0.65 0.42 0.41 0.52

Effect sizes and complementary analysis

In comparisons using the Wilcoxon signed-rank and paired Mann-Whitney U tests, significant differences and effect sizes ranging from small to large were identified (Table 8). The boys presented with lower stress levels, with smaller magnitudes (PE group: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.43) and moderate magnitudes (EG: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.51); lower depression scores with large effect (PE group: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.88); lower fatigue rates with moderate magnitudes (PE group: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.66) and reduced mental confusion with small effect (PE group: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.31). In addition, increased self-esteem with moderate magnitude (PE group: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.58) (Table 8).

Table 8. Summary of effect sizes (ES) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the investigated sample (n = 140) subdivided into condition (EG and PE group) and sex (boys and girls) and comparison of intergroup effects after intervention with EG and PE group.

Variables EG Effect Size (CI 95%) PE Group Effect size (CI 95%) EG x PE Group Effect Size (CI 95%)
Boys Girls Boys x Girls Boys Girls Boys x Girls Boys x Boys Girls x Girls
Pre x post Pre x post Post x post Pre x post Pre x post Post x post Post x post Post x post
Mood States
 Tension 0.51a 0.62a 0.30 0.43a 0.55a 0.11 0.45 0.07
(-0.03–1.0) (0.17–1.05) (-0.18–0.80) (-0.06–0.92) (-1.19–0.08) (-0.36–0.57) (-0.7–0.97) (-0.37–0.50)
 Depression -0.13 0.35 0.30 0.88a 0.71a 0.21 0.43 0.08
(-0.67–0.41) (-0.07–0.78) (-0.18–0.80) (-0.37–1.38) (0.25–1.16) (-0.25–0.67) (-0.09–0.94) (-0.36–0.51)
 Anger -0.15 0.21 0.61b 0.47 0.67 0.13 0.56b 0.02
(-0.69–0.40) (-0.21–0.64) (0.11–1.11) (-0.01–0.96) (0.21–1.13) (-0.45–0.48) (-0.43–1.09) (-0.41–0.46)
 Vigor 0.30 0.13 0.16 0.05 -0.27 0.29 0.46 0.56b
(-0.25–0.84) (-0.29–0.56) (-0.32–0.65) (-0.42–0.53) (-0-72–0.17) (-0.18–0.75) (-0.06–0.98) (0.12–1.01)
 Fatigue 0.11 -0.26 0.10 0.66a 0.24a 0.28b 0.38 0.15
(-0.42–0.65) (-0.69–0.16) (-0.38–0.60) (0.16–1.15) (-0.19–0.69) (-0.18–0.75) (-0.13–0.90) (-0.28–0.58)
 Mental confusion 0.22 0.37a 0.08 0.31a 0.61a 0.35b 0.35b 0.35b
(-0.31–0.77) (-0.06–0.80) (-0.40–0.57) (-0.17–0.80) (0.15–1.06) (-0.11–0.82) (-0.11–0.82) (-0.11–0.82)
Self-esteem
 Score 0.08 0.34 0.18 0.58a 0.42 0.19 0.22b 0.20
(-0.45–0.63) (-0.08–0.77) (-0.32–0.68) (0.08–1.07) (-0.02–0.87) (-0.27–0.66) (-0.29–0.74) (-0.23–0.44)

a. The Wilcoxon test identified a significant difference at the P < 0.05 level in the pre and post-test comparisons between the EG and PE group.

b. The Mann-Whitney U test identified a significant difference at the P < 0.05 level in the post test comparisons between boys and girls EG group and boys and girls PE group, and difference in the post-test between boys EG and PE group and difference in the post-test between girls EG and PE group.

The girls presented with stress reduction with moderate magnitude (EG: p <0.01; Cohen’s d = 0.62; PE group: p <0.01; Cohen’s d = 0.55); lower levels of depression with moderate effect (PE group: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.71); lower values for fatigue with small effect (PE group: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.24); in addition to reduced mental confusion with moderate magnitude (PE group: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.61) (Table 8).

In the EG, boys had higher rates of anger and greater effect than girls at the time after intervention (EG: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.61). In the PE group, small effects were identified in the variables fatigue (EG: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.28) and mental confusion (EG: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.38), both being smaller for boys than girls (Table 8).

In the intergroup analyses, boys from the PE group presented lower rates of anger and mental confusion, with moderate and small magnitudes (Boys: p <0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.56; Boys = p <0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.35, respectively), than those from the EG. In addition, self-esteem was higher in boys from the PE group, with small magnitude, than in those from the EG (Boys: p <0.01; Cohen’s d = 0.22) (Table 8). Among girls, the EG had moderate magnitudes and higher results for vigor (Girls: p <0.01; Cohen’s d = 0.56) than the PE group. Mental confusion was lower for the EG, and showed little effect, than the PE group (Girls: p <0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.35) (Table 8).

Discussion

The objective of this study was to determine if the practice of exergames has an acute effect on mood and self-esteem of boys and girls during school physical education classes and to compare the effects of the practice of exergames with routine curricular physical education classes. This natural experiment showed high ecological validity since there was no interference in the usual routine of the students [43]. Robertson et al. [10] suggest that considering the environment and context contributes to more robust results, especially when the intervention performed does not change the routine in the school environment. Innovation in physical education classes was characterized by including technological tools as experimentation in the participants’ natural context [10,44,45].

In our study, the positive acute effect on the psychological health of the students was verified and this supported the inclusion of little explored pedagogical resources into the physical education classes. Our study also demonstrated the possibility of the association between technology and body movement culture within schools, without, however, replacing traditionally enjoyable practices such as sports and games [55]. Studies conducted in the school environment have identified that the practice of exergames can promote increased physical activity and improved mental health and may be a potential educational tool [21,28,32,56,57]. Nevertheless, there are few studies that have investigated the practice of exergames as part of school physical education and its real effectiveness, requiring further study [58,59].

Our results reveal that the conditions (exergames and PE classes) and the sexes (boys and girls) presented differences. Overall, the average hours per day playing video games considered sedentary was higher for boys than girls, corroborating other studies [6,60]. In recent years there has been increasing concern regarding the excessive use of video games and the Internet due to the association with psychological and social comorbidities such as depression, attention deficit disorder, hyperactivity, alcohol intake, anxiety, and low psychosocial support [6,12]. For children, the fundamental role of physical education at school in raising students’ awareness of the importance of healthy practices in guiding the substitution of harmful practices is highlighted [21,34].

Mood

Regarding the mood of children in this study, our overall results revealed that the practice of exergames compared to traditional physical education classes produced similar effects, presenting higher levels of vigor while the other domains (tension, depression, anger, fatigue, and mental confusion) remained low, indicating good mental health [61]. Our results demonstrate that acute effects of the practice of exergames and PE classes were positive for both boys and girls. Lee et al. (2017) investigated mood states in children during PE classes and identified results similar to ours [21]. In another study, Gao et al. [28] proposed that the practice of exergames and physical education classes produce similar effects when analyzed in the context of different levels of intensity (light, moderate and vigorous), energy expenditure, and sedentary behavior [28]. Our study did not evaluate the intensity of the exercise sessions, however, considering the participants’ age, they were instructed to modulate the intensity according to their personal choice. The effect of exergames during physical education classes demonstrated success in children with light and moderate intensity [62].

In the pre-intervention moment, tension was high for boys and girls in both groups. Tension can be characterized by feelings such as nervousness, apprehension, worry, and anxiety [63]. High tension has revealed that this domain in mood is sensitive before physical education classes for children. In our study, tension decreased significantly between boys and girls after three sessions in both groups. This reduction considering the conditions and the participant’s sex can be explained due to the adaptations that the activities generated in the children. The novelty of the activity that diminished over time generated a natural relaxation in the students, so they began to dominate the components of the class session. Activities that offer greater control of motor actions such as breathing and postural control tend to be more effective in the long run [41].

In an isolated analysis of the exergames group, it is important to highlight that there are differences between playing video games individually and collectively, as they have different goals and are still unknown when considering individual preferences, such as age, sex, and level of aptitude [64]. Peng and Hsieh (2012) suggest that playing with friends (multiplayer) can have different impacts on players regarding motivation and engagement to practice, unlike when practiced individually [65]. These factors may also have contributed to reducing the tension generated by success or failure in game tasks [66].

Another finding from our study was that boys’ anger was higher than girls’ after exergames, while anger levels among boys and girls in PE classes remained low. Anger is characterized as a component that can influence a given task due to increased irritability and frustration [67]. In the case of boys, it was observed that, in part, the preference to participate in traditional sports activities (e.g., soccer) was manifested during the sessions in verbal reports to researchers. In observational analysis of the sessions, the boys showed greater resistance and did not fully accept the proposed practice, which may explain the higher levels of anger. In contrast, the girls showed a decrease in this domain and greater acceptance during the sessions. Our results partially contradict the findings of Lee, Xiang, and Gao [21] who identified, after 30-minute sessions with exergames, decreased anger. However, this study did not consider the influence of the child’s sex on their perception of mood of who participated in the study.

After the three sessions of both conditions and sexes, girls from both the EG and PE groups showed a reduction in mental confusion, while only boys from PE group showed a reduction in this domain. In the PE group, results of girls were significantly higher than those of boys. Although this presented with negative mood reduction, it is not possible to conclude if this reduction was associated with sex. It is well known that both the practice of exergames and physical education can bring psychosocial and cognitive impacts, as well as increase social interaction, motivation, attention, and visual-spatial skills [26,32]. With less competitive characteristics and no body contact between the participants, the practice of exergames can be used in an environment that seeks to eliminate possible conflicts between students. Positive relationship between physical activity and mood during physical education classes for children has been little reported in studies [16,21].

Self-esteem

The average self-esteem score presented in our study, according to the instrument proposed by Rosenberg (1965), was greater than 30, indicating good self-esteem [53]. Children with low self-esteem are at risk of developing psychological and social problems detrimental to their development [68]. Exercise and exergames have positive effects on various aspects of self-esteem in healthy children and adolescents [32,69]. High self-esteem associated with other healthy habits can predict adolescence with greater chances of success in motor and cognitive tasks, and low self-esteem is associated with disorders such as social phobia and depression in this age group [31].

After three sessions, our findings indicated a significant increase in self-esteem in girls in both groups, EG and PE, while only boys in the PE group showed a significant increase. During the practice of exergames the game applied in the experiment was Just Dance and this may have contributed to raising the girls’ self-esteem, since this type of game involves the dance content and consequently may have influenced more girls during body practices. The EG showed higher self-esteem than the PE group at the post-intervention moment. Duman et al. (2016) analyzed children who were considered obese and indicated a significant improvement in self-esteem [33]. In another study with children who were considered obese there was a significant increase in self-esteem using a cooperative exergame with both sexes [57], however, the authors identified significant improvement with competitive games. This improvement was greater than our study, however, children and adolescents that are considered obese usually have problems with low self-esteem and body satisfaction [33,34,58,70]. Nevertheless, our study found that a few sessions of exergames are sufficient to increase the self-esteem of healthy children. Performing innovative tasks in the school environment makes the students perceive of the school as a positive space for their self-esteem and cultural identity.

Innovations, strength of study, practical applications, and limitations

Our study presents innovative aspects. Exergames are easily accessible and involve relatively low costs, with the possibility of adoption by schools due to the low cost. Currently, there is an online platform (www.justdancenow.com) that, with a single annual subscription, allows you to play and exercise at the same time. It is a natural experiment that provided high ecological validity and proved its effectiveness as a form of physical activity in class. It is a cluster-randomized controlled experiment that included a significant number of participants, and it innovated by transferring theoretical and methodological scientific knowledge into the real school environment reaching the entire student community with an attractive practical proposal.

Annually, schools have made efforts to promote innovative practices used in teaching. Our study offers an opportunity for schools, managers, and teachers to discuss other innovative technologies that can integrate with their practice in the field for promoting physical education, along with sustainable and promising skills. By incorporating innovative technologies and practices, schools can benefit, even in the short term. Our study investigated the effect of exergames in the school environment, in addition to showing positive results for the participants, it demonstrated no harm or negative effects beyond the participation rates compared with other studies. Although conducted in just one school, our study demonstrated feasibility, in addition to the potential for replicability in other school environments and other age groups without major investment, sophisticated spaces, or significant resources.

Our results are encouraging, as we identified and analyzed the emotional responses of students during physical education classes using innovative interventions with exergames. Our study provides important information for the context and educational process. This study compared few exercise sessions with routine curricular physical education. The results showed that exergames provide an opportunity for children to be active in their educational environment using technological resources for physical and psychological health. Active games can improve the mental health of and have no undesirable effects on students.

Children engaged in active video games can benefit from long-lasting effects as well as lifelong active behavior. When considering the significant amount of time spent with traditional video games, especially in childhood, one can replace this passive practice with an active video game for better physical and psychological responses in the future. In addition, the use of exergames can diversify curricular physical education classes, making them more attractive to students. Being an approach that combines technology and body movement is interesting to promote an organized and fun environment attracting the largest number of participants.

In our study, no blinding was performed in the procedures. Future trials may wish to consider this factor to minimize confounding effects during the experiment. The use of only one school to conduct the study makes it difficult to generalize the results. Future trials need to consider increasing the number of schools participating. It is necessary to investigate the long-term effects of exergames compared to routine PE classes and whether they are capable of providing complementary physical activity that produces positive effects on mood, self-esteem, and other variables related to children’s mental health (e.g., depression). In this cluster-randomized and parallel group controlled experiment, only one set of exergames was used. Other games with consoles and diverse technology are required (e.g., challenging, sporting, competitive, and cooperative games). Regarding the sample, the lack of information on socioeconomic status, ethnic profile, academic performance, can be considered a limiting factor in our study. Such variables can contribute to a better understanding of the results identified. In addition, the impossibility of applying research instruments individually to participating children should be considered in future studies. Another point refers to the division of groups and overcoming the limitation of parallel groups, individuals can be compared with themselves using a crossover design after an adequate washout period. Our study did not test the intensity of movements performed in either the EG or PE group. This type of testing can contribute to investigate other outcomes that are still little explored when investigating the effects related to mental health and may contribute to the use of active video games as a complement in traditional curricular physical education classes.

Conclusions

The results indicate that a few sessions with exergames caused boys and girls to present positive variations in mood and self-esteem. The exergames practice showed higher positive acute effects in girls. However, PE classes were more effective in both boys and girls after three classes. The results indicate the importance of creating a task-oriented environment during the classes, which will promote positive experiences for both sexes, enabling the development of students and encouraging more active behaviors to improve children’s mental health.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge all the participating students and their parents, without whom the present study could not have been carried out. Additionally, the authors acknowledge all the members of the school for their enthusiasm and collaboration, especially the school principal and the physical education teachers.

Data Availability

All data underlying the findings described fully available in the manuscript.

Funding Statement

CKC: Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination (CAPES), Public notice (n. 03/2015). FAPESC (Research and Innovation Support Foundation of the State of Santa Catarina) for financial support through research (PAP 01/2016).

References

  • 1.Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Martínez-Gómez D, Labayen I, Moreno LA, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in european adolescents. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174: 173–184. 10.1093/aje/kwr068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bergmann GG, Bergmann ML de A, Marques AC, Hallal PC. Prevalence of physical inactivity and associated factors among adolescents from public schools in Uruguaiana, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2013;29: 2217–2229. 10.1590/0102-311x00077512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sas-Nowosielski K, Szopa S, Kowalczyk A. Use of Mobile Fitness-Related Applications and Active Video Games in High-School Youth. Polish J Sport Tour. 2016;23: 167–170. 10.1515/pjst-2016-0022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dumith SC, Gigante DP, Domingues MR, Kohl HW. Physical activity change during adolescence: A systematic review and a pooled analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40: 685–698. 10.1093/ije/dyq272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ortega FB, Konstabel K, Pasquali E, Ruiz JR, Hurtig-Wennlöf A, Mäestu J, et al. Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time during Childhood, Adolescence and Young Adulthood: A Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2013;8 10.1371/journal.pone.0060871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sussman CJ, Harper JM, Stahl JL, Weigle P. Inter n et and Video Game Addictions. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Clin NA. 2018;27: 307–326. 10.1016/j.chc.2017.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Scott DA, Valley B, Simecka BA. Mental Health Concerns in the Digital Age. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2017;15: 604–613. 10.1007/s11469-016-9684-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Odiaga JA, Doucette J. Technological Media and Sedentary Behavior in Pediatrics. J Nurse Pract. 2017;13: 72–78. 10.1016/j.nurpra.2016.09.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, Saunders TJ, Larouche R, Colley RC, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8: 98 10.1186/1479-5868-8-98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Robertson J, Jepson R, Macvean A, Gray S. Understanding the Importance of Context : A Qualitative Study of a Location-Based Exergame to Enhance School Childrens Physical Activity. 2016; 1–27. 10.1371/journal.pone.0160927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Benzing V, Heinks T, Eggenberger N, Schmidt M. Acute cognitively engaging exergame-based physical activity enhances executive functions in adolescents. PLoS One. 2016;11: 1–15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0167501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kardefelt-winther D. Computers in Human Behavior A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Comput Human Behav. 2014;31: 351–354. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Andrade A, Correia CK, Coimbra DR. The Psychological Effects of Exergames for Children and Adolescents with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22: 724–735. 10.1089/cyber.2019.0341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hallal PC, Victora CG, Azevedo MR, Wells JCK. Adolescent Physical Activity and Health. Sport Med. 2006;36: 1019–1030. 10.2165/00007256-200636120-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bruno LE. Embracing Technology and Pop Culture Trends in Physical Education: Ready, Set, (Pokémon) Go! J Phys Educ Recreat Danc. 2018;89: 45–51. 10.1080/07303084.2018.1430627 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Andrade A, Correia CK, da Cruz WM, Bevilacqua GG. Acute Effect of Exergames on Children’s Mood States During Physical Education Classes. Games Health J. 2019; 1–8. 10.1089/g4h.2018.0083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Staiano AE, Beyl RA, Hsia DS, Katzmarzyk PT, Newton RL. Twelve weeks of dance exergaming in overweight and obese adolescent girls: Transfer effects on physical activity, screen time, and self-efficacy. J Sport Heal Sci. 2017;6: 4–10. 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Finco MD, Reategui EB, Zaro MA. Exergames lab: a complementary space for physical education classes. Movimento. 2015;21: 687–699. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gao Z, Chen S, Pasco D, Pope Z. A meta-analysis of active video games on health outcomes among children and adolescents. Obes Rev. 2015;16: 783–794. 10.1111/obr.12287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Canabrava KLR, Faria FR, De Lima JRP, Guedes DP, Amorim PRS. Energy Expenditure and Intensity of Active Video Games in Children and Energy Expenditure and Intensity of Active Video Games in Children and Adolescents. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018;00: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee JE, Xiang P, Gao Z. Acute effect of active video games on older children’s mood change. Comput Human Behav. 2017;70: 97–103. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.060 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee S, Kim W, Park T, Peng W. The Psychological Effects of Playing Exergames: A Systematic Review. Cyberpsychology, Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20: 513–532. 10.1089/cyber.2017.0183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.LeBlanc AG, Chaput JP, McFarlane A, Colley RC, Thivel D, Biddle SJH, et al. Active Video Games and Health Indicators in Children and Youth: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2013;8 10.1371/journal.pone.0065351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sheehan DP. The Impact of a Six Week Exergaming Curriculum on Balance with Pre Adolescent School Children. Int J Comput Sci Sport. 2011;11: 252. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zeng N, Gao Z. Exergaming and obesity in youth: Current perspectives. Int J Gen Med. 2016;9: 275–284. 10.2147/IJGM.S99025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ho SS, Lwin MO, Sng JRH, Yee AZH. Escaping through exergames: Presence, enjoyment, and mood experience in predicting children’s attitude toward exergames. Comput Human Behav. 2017;72: 381–389. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Baranowski T. Exergaming: Hope for future physical activity? or blight on mankind? J Sport Heal Sci. 2017;6: 44–46. 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gao Z, Pope Z, Eun J, Stodden D, Roncesvalles N. Impact of exergaming on young children ‘ s school day energy expenditure and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels. J Sport Heal Sci. 2017;6: 11–16. 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chacón R, Zurita F, Castro M, Espejo T, Martínez-Martínez A, Linares M. Estudio Sobre La Aplicabilidad De Exergames Para La Mejora De Los Índices De Obesidad Y La Imagen Corporal En Escolares Research of the Applicability of Exergames for the Improvement of Obesity Index and Body Image in School Children Estudo Da Aplicabilid. Rev Iberoam Psicol del Ejerc y el Deport. 2016;11: 1 Available: http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3111/311143051011.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Song H, Kim J, Lee KM. Virtual vs. real body in exergames: Reducing social physique anxiety in exercise experiences. Comput Human Behav. 2014;36: 282–285. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gao Z, Zhang T, Stodden D. Children’s physical activity levels and psychological correlates in interactive dance versus aerobic dance. J Sport Heal Sci. 2013;2: 146–151. 10.1016/j.jshs.2013.01.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Staiano AE, Abraham AA, Calvert SL. Motivating effects of cooperative exergame play for overweight and obese adolescents. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6: 812–819. 10.1177/193229681200600412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Duman F, Kokacya MH, Dogru E, Katayifci N, Canbay O, Aman F. The Role Of Active Video Accompanied Exercises In Preventing Obesity In Children: A Prospective Study From Turkey. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2016;8: 334–340. 10.4274/jcrpe.2284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Christison A, Khan HA. Exergaming for health: A community-based pediatric weight management program using active video gaming. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012;51: 382–388. 10.1177/0009922811429480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ennis CD. Implications of exergaming for the physical education curriculum in the 21st century. J Sport Heal Sci. 2013;2: 152–157. 10.1016/j.jshs.2013.02.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rohlfs ICP de M, Rotta TM, Luft CDB, Andrade A, Krebs RJ, de Carvalho T, et al. Brunel Mood Scale (BRUMS): an Instrument for Early Detection of Overtraining Syndrome. Rev Bras Med do Esporte. 2008;14: 176–181. 10.1590/s1517-86922008000300003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Brandt R, Herrero D, Massetti T, Crocetta TB, Guarnieri R, de Mello Monteiro CB, et al. The Brunel Mood Scale Rating in Mental Health for Physically Active and Apparently Healthy Populations. Health (Irvine Calif). 2016;08: 125–132. 10.4236/health.2016.82015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brandt R, Bevilacqua GG, Andrade A. Perceived Sleep Quality, Mood States, and Their Relationship with Performance among Brazilian Elite Athletes during a Competitive Period. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31: 1033–1039. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ruiz-Ariza A, Suárez-Manzano S, López-Serrano S, Martínez-López EJ. The effect of cooperative high-intensity interval training on creativity and emotional intelligence in secondary school: A randomised controlled trial. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2019;25: 355–373. 10.1177/1356336X17739271 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mayorga-Vega D, Montoro-Escaño J, Merino-Marban R, Viciana J. Effects of a physical education-based programme on health-related physical fitness and its maintenance in high school students. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2016;22: 243–259. 10.1177/1356336x15599010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Noggle JJ, Steiner NJ. Benefits of Yoga for Psychosocial Well-Being in a US High School Curriculum: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial. 2012;33: 193–201. 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31824afdc4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Danthony S, Mascret N, Cury F. Test anxiety in physical education: The predictive role of gender, age, and implicit theories of athletic ability. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2019; 1–16. 10.1177/1356336X19839408 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Azevedo LB, Burges Watson D, Haighton C, Adams J. The effect of dance mat exergaming systems on physical activity and health—Related outcomes in secondary schools: Results from a natural experiment. BMC Public Health. 2014;14: 1–13. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Craig P, Katikireddi SV, Leyland A, Popham F. Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Humphreys DK, Panter J, Sahlqvist S, Goodman A, Ogilvie D. Changing the environment to improve population health: A framework for considering exposure in natural experimental studies. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70: 941–946. 10.1136/jech-2015-206381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Andrade A, Bevilacqua GG, Coimbra DR, Pereira FS, Brandt R. Sleep quality, mood and performance: A study of elite Brazilian volleyball athletes. J Sport Sci Med. 2016;15: 601–605. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dreyhaupt J, Mayer B, Muche R, Keis O, Öchsner W. Cluster-randomized studies in educational research: Principles and methodological aspects. GMS J Med Educ. 2017;34: 1–25. 10.3205/zma001103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Norris E, Hamer M, Stamatakis E. Active video games in schools and effects on physical activity and health: A systematic review. J Pediatr. 2016;172: 40–46.e5. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Faul FE and L et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;148: 175–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Terry PC, Stevens MJ, Lane AM. Influence of response time frame on mood assessment. Anxiety, Stress Coping. 2005;18: 279–285. 10.1080/10615800500134688 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rosenberg M. Determinants of Self-Esteem. Cit Class. 1989;11: 14. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sbicigo JB, Bandeira DR D D. Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg (EAR): validade fatorial e consistência interna. Psico-USF. 2010;15: 395–403. 10.1590/S1413-82712010000300012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Isomaa R, Väänänen JM, Fröjd S, Kaltiala-Heino R, Marttunen M. How Low Is Low? Low Self-Esteem as an Indicator of Internalizing Psychopathology in Adolescence. Heal Educ Behav. 2013;40: 392–399. 10.1177/1090198112445481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second Edi New York: Laurence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gao Z, Chen S, Pasco D, Pope Z. A meta-analysis of active video games on health outcomes among children and adolescents. Obes Rev. 2015;16: 783–794. 10.1111/obr.12287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lindberg R, Seo J, Laine TH. Enhancing Physical Education with Exergames and Wearable Technology. IEEE Trans Learn Technol. 2016;9: 328–341. 10.1109/TLT.2016.2556671 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Staiano A and C. Adolescent Exergame Play for Weight Loss and Psychosocial Improvement: A Controlled Physical Activity Intervention. 2013;25: 289–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Vaghetti CAO, Monteiro-Junior RS, Finco MD, Reategui E, Da Costa Botelho SS. Exergames experience in physical education: A review. Phys Cult Sport Stud Res. 2018;78: 23–32. 10.2478/pcssr-2018-0010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Joronen K, Aikasalo A, Suvitie A. Nonphysical effects of exergames on child and adolescent well-being: a comprehensive systematic review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017;31: 449–461. 10.1111/scs.12393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Castro-Sánchez M, Chacón-Cuberos R, Ubago-Jiménez JL, Zafra-Santos E, Zurita-Ortega F. An explanatory model for the relationship between motivation in sport, victimization, and video game use in schoolchildren. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15: 1–15. 10.3390/ijerph15091866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Morgan WP. Test of Champions: the iceberg profile. Psychol Today. 1980;14: 92. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lwin MO, Malik S. The ef fi cacy of exergames-incorporated physical education lessons in in fl uencing drivers of physical activity: A comparison of children and pre-adolescents. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012;13: 756–760. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.04.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fielding J, Young S, Martin PR, Waters AM. Headache symptoms consistent with migraine and tension-type headaches in children with anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord. 2016;40: 67–74. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Marker AM, Staiano AE. Better Together: Outcomes of Cooperation Versus Competition in Social Exergaming. 2015;4: 25–30. 10.1089/g4h.2014.0066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Peng W, Hsieh G. Computers in Human Behavior The influence of competition, cooperation, and player relationship in a motor performance centered computer game. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28: 2100–2106. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Maivorsdotter N, Quennerstedt M. Exploring gender habits. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2018; 1356336X1881002. 10.1177/1356336X18810023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Krieger FV, Leibenluft E, Stringaris A, Polanczyk G V. Irritability in children and adolescents: Past concepts, current debates, and future opportunities. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2013;35: 32–39. 10.1590/1516-4446-2013-S107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hosogi M, Okada A, Fujii C, Noguchi K, Watanabe K. Importance and usefulness of evaluating self- esteem in children. Biopsychosoc Med. 2012;6: 9 10.1186/1751-0759-6-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rasmussen M, Laumann K. The academic and psychological benefits of exercise in healthy children and adolescents. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2013;28: 945–962. 10.1007/s10212-012-0148-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Matias TS, Rolim MKSB, Kretzer FL, Schmoelz CP, Andrade A. Corporal satisfaction associated with physical activity practice during adolescence. Motriz Rev Educ Física UNESP. 2010;16: 370–378. 10.5016/1980-6574.2010v16n2p370 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero

7 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-24839

Effect of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of boys and girls during physical education classes: a cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr Alexandro Andrade,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by 24/2/20. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

The work entitled “Effect of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of boys and girls during physical education classes: a cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment” is of great interest in the mental health field. The research is very stimulating. As comments I would like to say:

1.- According to criterion #3: ""Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail." (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/criteria-for-publication#loc-3), Please add: " post-hoc corrections for multiple comparisons " and "effect sizes".

2.- Add the main hypotheses at the end of the intro.

3.-Add more information about the all sociodemographic characteristics of the sample, e.g., ethnicity, socio-economic status, etc.

4.-Do you have any information about non-response? Describe inclusion/exclusion criteria if part of the data was excluded from the analysis. Were outliers removed from the data? Please, Which method did you use to deal with missing data in the analyses? What variables are related to missing data?

5.- Add information about the main goals on each physical education session.

6.- Add psychometric properties of measures used in this study (Omega, validity evidences).

7.- I am wondering if you can assess psychological variables with self-reports tools in this age group.

8.- Please compute a MANOVA intra/inter (report, Wilks’ lambda and eta square) (see also point 1).

9.- Add subheadings in Results section.

10.- Please, add information about the limitations of the present study (e.g., sample, measures, etc.)

11.- Add degrees of freedom.

12.- Please move the First paragraph of the results section to participants section.

13.- I don’t know if is better talk about sex or gender.

14.- Please, follow carefully Plos One guidelines (tables, subheadings, etc.)

15.- You don’t have considered relevant covariables like IQ, school achievement, if boy and girls practise other sports at the same time, etc.

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please refer to any post-hoc corrections to correct for multiple comparisons during your statistical analyses. if these were not performed please justify the reasons.

3. Please amend your list of authors on the manuscript to ensure that each author is linked to an affiliation. Authors’ affiliations should reflect the institution where the work was done (if authors moved subsequently, you can also list the new affiliation stating “current affiliation:….” as necessary).

4. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 4 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors present a very interesting and methodologically sound work that examines the effects of of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of boys and girls during physical education classes. To this end, the authors designed a cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment with two arms with 96 participants in the experimental group (EG) and 91 participants in the control group (CG). The EG practiced exergames during three 40-minute classes, and the PE group held three routine curricular PE classes.

I consider that the work carried out by the authors is remarkable and very relevant at the social and educational level.

Here are some recommendations to improve the final quality of the manuscript:

1. It would be convenient to include reliability figures of the measuring instruments used, both from the literature and from the data of this study.

2. The percentage of sample lost is 34.27% and the authors indicate in the manuscrit that it is an "acceptable" value with reference to other studies conducted in educational contexts, but the authors do not include any references. It would be convenient to provide sample loss data in other similar studies.

3. I wonder about the assessment process and, in particular, about how the veracity of children's responses to the measuring instruments used was guaranteed. Specifically, I am concerned that some children may have responded randomly to the tests.

4. In line with the previous point, it is necessary to include more information about the children evaluation process: did they respond to the items alone, in group, with study researchers...? How the children understood of the items was guaranteed?...

5.- I have serious concerns about the excessive exposure of technology in schools. I have no doubts about the attractiveness and facilitator effects of these types of programs but I am worried about other potential effects of children overexposure to "screens" at school (smartphones, tablets, laptops, PCs,...). The long-term effects in other psychological variables -for instance on frustration tolerance, emotional regulation strategies or increasing the risk of addiction to new technologies in vulnerable children- of long-term overexposed are unknown. These variables, moreover, have not been measured in this trial, which seems to me to be a significant limitation.

It is clear that the current trend of education is going to incorporate TICS, and children really love them, but I am still worried about its global impact on the psychological development of children. I think it is important to add some reflection on these risks in the manuscript. In addition, it would be convenient to take into account in the manuscript the possibility of developing alternative intervention protocols for children already "over-hooked" to ICTs and/or to reduce this risk in vulnerable childrens and offering alternatives to them.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript “Effect of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of boys and girls during physical education classes: a cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment” is innovative and it offers a new possibility to study an important problem in children, like the psychological health and the sedentary life habits.

Then, I will present the possible adjustments:

1.- It would be recommended add the age of the participants in the title.

2.- Some of the studies you cite use more sessions to evaluate the results. Maybe it would be good to take more time (instead of just 3 sessions) for the validity of the results.

3.- Using only one school to carry out the study makes it difficult to generalize the results. That is, external validity is affected.

4.- How is the evaluation of students participating in the study carried out? Explain the process to select the sample.

5.- The understanding of the questionnaires used may be affected by the age of the participants.

6.- In the "results" section, clarify in the tables what each variable means.

7.- In the "discussion" section, the results are compared with some studies, but in them, the results involve adolescent participants and more time in sessions, such as Simons et al. (2015) or the statements of lines 349 to 353. Maybe the results cannot be compared at the same level.

8.- Did the school have the material used to carry out the exergame?

9.- It would be advisable to add information on the price of the resources used in the study, to study the viability in all schools.

10.- In what month was the study conducted? Had they had physical education sessions already at school?

11.- Were the physical education sessions novel for the studies or otherwise they had already done them?

Add information on these aspects for the replicability of the study.

12.- I recommend adding recent research information:

- “The Psychological Effects of Exergames for Children and Adolescents with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” (2019) Andrade, A., Correia, CK., Coimbra, DR. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/cyber.2019.0341

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0232392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232392.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


7 Mar 2020

February 24, 2020

Dr. Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Dear Editor,

The manuscript has been carefully reviewed, and appropriate changes have been made in accordance with the reviewer suggestions. We would like to thank the referees for their comments. They have helped to improve the manuscript quality significantly, and we believe that the manuscript now provides a more balanced and better account of the research. We have used the red color to mark all the revisions in the manuscript.

Below the author's comments on the suggestions of reviewer.

Sincerely,

Alexandro Andrade PhD.

Affiliation: Professor of Santa Catarina State University.

Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Phone Number: +55 (48) 3664-8677

Email: alexandro.andrade.phd@gmail.com

Additional Editor Comments

General comments:

“The work entitled “Effect of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of boys and girls during physical education classes: a cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment” is of great interest in the mental health field. The research is very stimulating.”

1. According to criterion #3: ""Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail." (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/criteria-for-publication#loc-3), Please add: "post-hoc corrections for multiple comparisons " and "effect sizes".

Author’s comments: We include the post-hoc used in the statistical tests. The item “effect sizes” was careful revised and we included the effect size eta partial squared value on two-way MANOVA test.

2. Add the main hypotheses at the end of the intro.

Author’s comments: We added the main hypotheses at the intro.

3. Add more information about the all sociodemographic characteristics of the sample, e.g., ethnicity, socio-economic status, etc.

Author’s comments: We added data related to the characteristics of the school and the socioeconomic profiles of the students in the manuscript. Our study was carried out in a private non-profit (philanthropic) school. Therefore, our sample was composed of students with different socioeconomic status and ethnicity. We added in the study's limitations the non-inclusion of the specific data of the students because it was not carried out individually with each student.

4. Do you have any information about non-response? Describe inclusion/exclusion criteria if part of the data was excluded from the analysis. Were outliers removed from the data? Please, Which method did you use to deal with missing data in the analyses? What variables are related to missing data?

Author’s comments: When analyzing the instruments filled in by the children, when there was no response or even forgetfulness during filling, the researchers informed individually so that it was filled out as requested. Children who participated in only one of the collections or who, for the reasons described (see flow chart) missed an exergame session, were removed from the sample. We decided to exclude data with missing information due to the analysis and considering the statistical robustness used.

5. Add information about the main goals on each physical education session.

Author’s comments: More information regarding traditional physical education classes was added to the text. Physical education classes aimed to develop basic motor skills and improve physical capabilities.

6. Add psychometric properties of measures used in this study (Omega, validity evidences).

Author’s comments: We included this information: A pilot study was performed to identify Cronbach’s 𝞪 (alpha) value. Considering our population (i.e., Brazilian children in a school environment), the result revealed that BRUMS is a reliable instrument to measure the six domains of mood state in children (𝞪 = 0.781).

I am wondering if you can assess psychological variables with self-reports tools in this age group.

Author’s comments: In the case of a natural experiment, the instruments applied were validated to be answered by the research participants themselves. In addition, the instruments used have been tested and validated and have been applied in previous studies in children.

7. Please compute a MANOVA intra/inter (report, Wilks’ lambda and eta square) (see also point 1).

Author’s comments: We tested MANOVA two-way and reported the Wilk’s lambda and eta partial squared.

8. Add subheadings in Results section.

Author’s comments:

Considering this question the following subheading were included: “Analysis of mood states and self-esteem in boys, Analysis of mood states and self-esteem in girls, Analysis of mood states and self-esteem in EG group, Analysis of mood states and self-esteem in PE group”.

9. Please, add information about the limitations of the present study (e.g., sample, measures, etc.)

Author’s comments: The following information was included: “Regarding the sample, the lack of information on socioeconomic status, ethnic profile, academic performance, can be considered a limiting factor in our study. Such variables can contribute to a better understanding of the results identified. In addition, the impossibility of applying research instruments individually to participating children should be considered in future studies. Another point refers to the division of groups and overcoming the limitation of parallel groups, individuals can be compared with themselves using a crossover design after an adequate washout period.”

10. Add degrees of freedom.

Author’s comments: We added degrees of freedom in section Results.

11. Please move the First paragraph of the results section to participants section.

Author’s comments: It has been done.

12. I don’t know if is better talk about sex or gender.

Author’s comments: In a recent study with adolescents published in PLOSONE, the term sex was used [1]. In our study, when investigating children, we considered the use of sex to be more appropriate. Because the English term “gender” can have many different meanings depending on the context, including the nature of the published work and the nationality of the author or reader. We consider the term “sex” to be more accurate and less likely to be misinterpreted.

13. Please, follow carefully Plos One guidelines (tables, subheadings, etc.)

Author’s comments: We carefully revised Plos One guidelines.

14. You don’t have considered relevant covariables like IQ, school achievement, if boy and girls practise other sports at the same time, etc.

Author’s comments: Information about physical activity during the research was included. The other information was included as a limitation.

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please refer to any post-hoc corrections to correct for multiple comparisons during your statistical analyses. if these were not performed please justify the reasons.

Author’s comments: We included post-hoc corrections.

2. Please amend your list of authors on the manuscript to ensure that each author is linked to an affiliation. Authors’ affiliations should reflect the institution where the work was done (if authors moved subsequently, you can also list the new affiliation stating “current affiliation ” as necessary).

Author’s comments: The following information was included: 2 Laboratory of Aquatic Biomechanics, Santa Catarina State University, Florianópolis, Brazil.

3. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 4 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

Author’s comments: We included the information.

Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters).

Reviewer #1: Comments to Author

General comments:

The authors present a very interesting and methodologically sound work that examines the effects of of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of boys and girls during physical education classes. To this end, the authors designed a cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment with two arms with 96 participants in the experimental group (EG) and 91 participants in the control group (CG). The EG practiced exergames during three 40-minute classes, and the PE group held three routine curricular PE classes. I consider that the work carried out by the authors is remarkable and very relevant at the social and educational level.

1. It would be convenient to include reliability figures of the measuring instruments used, both from the literature and from the data of this study.

Author’s comments: We included this information: “A pilot study was performed to identify Cronbach’s 𝞪 (alpha) value. Considering our population (i.e., Brazilian children in a school environment), the result revealed that BRUMS is a reliable instrument to measure the six domains of mood state in children (𝞪 = 0.781).”

2. The percentage of sample lost is 34.27% and the authors indicate in the manuscript that it is an "acceptable" value with reference to other studies conducted in educational contexts, but the authors do not include any references. It would be convenient to provide sample loss data in other similar studies.

Author’s comments: As it is a natural experiment, our study did not predict an early drop-out rate. In a recent systematic review of active video games in schools, Norris et al (2016) presented insufficient details regarding the participation rate in the reviewed studies. Even so, our study showed a participation rate of 65.73% of all eligible students after randomization by cluster (n = 213).

We included this information in manuscript: “Overall, there was an effective participation rate of 65.73% of eligible children who performed all the procedures required in this experiment. When analyzed between groups, the participation rate was greater than 70% (Fig. 1). In terms of percentage, the participation in our study can be considered moderate to high compared with other studies with the theme of exergames in the school context, as the participation rates of similarly themed published studies have varied between 18 and 97% [48].”

3. I wonder about the assessment process and, in particular, about how the veracity of children's responses to the measuring instruments used was guaranteed. Specifically, I am concerned that some children may have responded randomly to the tests.

Author’s comments: We appreciate the reviewer's notes. We included this information in manuscript: “Before data collection, a pilot study was carried out with ten children in the age group of the present study, to verify the level of understanding of the instruments by the participants and to verify that the children would not respond randomly. In a second step, the children who participated in the study received detailed instructions on how to complete the instruments. In addition, during the time designated for completion of the instruments, two researchers remained in the classroom to clarify issues and fill any gaps in the procedural recall and understanding needed for proper completion of the instruments. We identified in this pilot study that the children were able to concentrate without any distraction that would hinder the progress of the research.’

4. In line with the previous point, it is necessary to include more information about the children evaluation process: did they respond to the items alone, in group, with study researchers...? How the children understood of the items was guaranteed?...

Author’s comments: The following information was included: “All procedures for both data collection and intervention took place at the school where the interventions were performed. The children were evaluated in rooms equipped with chairs and tables and performed individually without interference from any other participant. All children were supported by the researchers in completing the instruments.”

5. I have serious concerns about the excessive exposure of technology in schools. I have no doubts about the attractiveness and facilitator effects of these types of programs but I am worried about other potential effects of children overexposure to "screens" at school (smartphones, tablets, laptops, PCs,...). The long-term effects in other psychological variables -for instance on frustration tolerance, emotional regulation strategies or increasing the risk of addiction to new technologies in vulnerable children- of long-term overexposed are unknown. These variables, moreover, have not been measured in this trial, which seems to me to be a significant limitation.

Author’s comments: We agree with the reviewer. Our focus was on acute effect of practice exergames in children. Considering the suggestion of the reviewer, we included in the limitation.

Additional Reviewer #1 Comment

It is clear that the current trend of education is going to incorporate TICS, and children really love them, but I am still worried about its global impact on the psychological development of children. I think it is important to add some reflection on these risks in the manuscript. In addition, it would be convenient to take into account in the manuscript the possibility of developing alternative intervention protocols for children already "over-hooked" to ICTs and/or to reduce this risk in vulnerable childrens and offering alternatives to them.

Author’s comments: We are grateful for the reviewer's considerations and included in the session practical applications and limitations on risks and damage to physical and mental health caused by passive electronic games and a lack of guidance on overuse. Physical education classes with exergames aim to guide healthy and conscious practices.

Reviewer #2: Comments to Author

General comments:

The manuscript “Effect of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of boys and girls during physical education classes: a cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment” is innovative and it offers a new possibility to study an important problem in children, like the psychological health and the sedentary life habits.

1. It would be recommended add the age of the participants in the title.

Author’s comments: We add elementary school in title: “Effect of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of elementary school boys and girls during physical education classes: a cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment”

2. Some of the studies you cite use more sessions to evaluate the results. Maybe it would be good to take more time (instead of just 3 sessions) for the validity of the results.

Author’s comments: We believe that more sessions may have different results than the one identified in this study. However, the objective was to investigate only three sessions, since analyzing the acute effect on mental health becomes relevant since in schools there is a constant change in the contents planned during curricular physical education. In addition, this understanding of psychological aspects can contribute in the short term to the adequacy of stimulating tasks with a direct impact on students' motivation and engagement.

3. Using only one school to carry out the study makes it difficult to generalize the results. That is, external validity is affected.

Author’s comments: We agree with the reviewer and include it in session Innovations, strength of study, practical applications, and limitations: “The use of only one school to conduct the study makes it difficult to generalize the results. Future trials need to consider increasing the number of schools participating.”.

4. How is the evaluation of students participating in the study carried out? Explain the process to select the sample.

Author’s comments: This study was conducted with children from 10 different classes (clusters). The number of students per class ranged from 20 to 25 students. A sample of 213 children aged 7-11 years were invited to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria were: (a) to be regularly enrolled in school; (b) not have any physical, cognitive, or mental disability, according to the student’s existing records at school; and (c) have no commitment that would prevent him from responding to the instruments. Of the total, 15 children were not present on the day of study presentation, four did not meet the participants’ inclusion criteria, and seven were excluded for other reasons.

5. The understanding of the questionnaires used may be affected by the age of the participants.

Author’s comments: The instruments used were validated and used for this age group, with results published in other studies.

6. In the "results" section, clarify in the tables what each variable means.

Author’s comments: Corrections were made.

7. In the "discussion" section, the results are compared with some studies, but in them, the results involve adolescent participants and more time in sessions, such as Simons et al. (2015) or the statements of lines 349 to 353. Maybe the results cannot be compared at the same level.

Author’s comments: We agree with the reviewer that the comparison does not occur at the same level between children and adolescents and that the exposure time in exegames was not the same. We removed this part of the discussion in the manuscript.

8. Did the school have the material used to carry out the exergame?

Author’s comments: Had no exergames, but was equipped with a screen projector.

9. It would be advisable to add information on the price of the resources used in the study, to study the viability in all schools.

Author’s comments: We included this information in session Innovations, strength of study, practical applications, and limitations “Exergames are easily accessible and involve relatively low costs, with the possibility of adoption by schools due to the low cost. Currently, there is an online platform (www.justdancenow.com) that, with a single annual subscription, allows you to play and exercise at the same time”.

10. In what month was the study conducted? Had they had physical education sessions already at school?

Author’s comments: The school was selected for offering twice a week physical education classes lasting 40 minutes each. We add the following information: During the school term (May of 2018)

11. Were the physical education sessions novel for the studies or otherwise they had already done them? Add information on these aspects for the replicability of the study.

Author’s comments: Consisted of regular activities previously chosen by the class teachers without any interference from the researchers.

12. I recommend adding recent research information:

- “The Psychological Effects of Exergames for Children and Adolescents with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” (2019) Andrade, A., Correia, CK., Coimbra, DR. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/cyber.2019.0341

Author’s comments: We agree with the reviewer and included the recent research.

1. Silva DAS, Chaput JP, Tremblay MS. Participation frequency in physical education classes and physical activity and sitting time in Brazilian adolescents. PLoS One. 2019;14: 1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213785

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reponse to reviewer_V1_PlosOne.docx

Decision Letter 1

Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero

15 Apr 2020

Effect of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of elementary school boys and girls during physical education classes: a cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment

PONE-D-19-24839R1

Dear Dr. Andrade,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have satisfactorily addressed all the comments made. I have no further comment to make.

Reviewer #2: The comments made have been added and taken into account for the new version. The authors have analyzed the proposals and have modified minimal issues suggested by the reviewer. I consider that the article is therefore suitable for publication.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero

28 Apr 2020

PONE-D-19-24839R1

Effect of practice exergames on the mood states and self-esteem of boys and girls during physical education classes: a cluster-randomized controlled natural experiment

Dear Dr. Andrade:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reponse to reviewer_V1_PlosOne.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All data underlying the findings described fully available in the manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES