Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Jun 5;73(9):778–780. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.06.001

Decrease in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction admissions in Catalonia during the COVID-19 pandemic

Reducción de los ingresos por infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST en Cataluña durante la pandemia de COVID-19

Rafael Romaguera a,b, Aida Ribera b,c,d,, Francesc Güell-Viaplana e, Carlos Tomás-Querol f, Juan Francisco Muñoz-Camacho g, Víctor Agudelo h; , on behalf of the Codi IAM investigators
PMCID: PMC7274622  PMID: 32565077

To the Editor,

On February 2020, the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) rapidly spread throughout Europe. Due to the lack of pharmacological treatment or vaccine, governments adopted measures called social distancing to reduce the peak intensity of the epidemic. In Spain, the government issued a decree declaring a state of alarm on 14 March, 2020.

Timely reperfusion therapy by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is recommended for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)1 and its benefit is time-dependent, with longer delays associated with worse outcomes. A recent survey of Spanish STEMI networks reported a reduction in pPCI procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic.2 We aimed to assess the reduction in STEMI admissions and changes in patient characteristics, delay times and early mortality during the first weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in Catalonia.

In Catalonia, a Spanish region with 7.6 million inhabitants, acute care for patients with STEMI is organized through a regional network of 10 pPCI hospitals.

The AMI code registry collects data from all attended STEMI patients. The registry belongs to the health department of the Catalan government and its completion is compulsory and periodically audited. The database conforms to ethical and legal requirements for research purposes, and all study procedures are conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration.

All patients with a confirmed STEMI from 1 March to 19 April, 2020, were compared with patients attended within the same dates in 2019.

Delay times were defined according to the European Guidelines.1 Patient delay was defined as time from symptom onset to first medical contact. System delay as time from first contact to reperfusion therapy. Ischemia time as time from symptom onset to reperfusion therapy. Delay times were stratified by site of first medical contact.

Admission rates were estimated with Poisson regression models with time (days) as a continuous variable. Categorical variables are expressed as number and percentage and were compared with the chi-square test. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and were compared with the Student t test. Time intervals are expressed as median [interquartile range] and were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test. Mortality at 10 days after activation was estimated for all patients with available information about vital status (STEMI occurring between March 1 and April 10).

A total of 395 STEMI patients were admitted during the 2020 period and 524 during the same period in 2019. The mean number of daily admissions was 10.5 in 2019 and 7.9 in 2020 (incidence rate ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.86). In 2020, there was a significant 52% reduction in daily admissions from day 1 to day 50 (figure 1 ). There were few differences between the groups (table 1 ).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Daily rate of confirmed ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction admissions between March 1 and April 19 in 2019 (A) and 2020 (B).

Table 1.

Characteristics, delay times and outcomes of patients with confirmed ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

Valid n 2019 Valid n 2020 P
Female sex 524 109 (20.8) 395 78 (19.8) .694
Age 524 63.4 ± 0.6 395 61.9 ± 0.7 .104
Age > 80 y 524 70 (13.4) 395 37 (9.4) .062
Previous history of cardiovascular disease 524 73 (13.9) 395 64 (16.2) .339
First assisted in hospital 524 232 (44.3) 395 145 (36.7) .021
Sudden cardiac death 524 33 (6.3) 395 18 (4.6) .254
Killip III-IV 501 53 (10.6) 387 43 (11.1) .800
pPCI 519 425 (81.1) 394 337 (85.3) .141
TIMI flow pre (no flow) 311 195 (62.7) 296 195 (65.9) .414
TIMI flow post (normal) 309 298 (96.4) 292 279 (96) .577
Delay time, median [q25-q75]
 Patient delay
  Attended by EMS 174 49 [24-90] 156 59 [29-132.5] .059
  Attended at hospitals 302 115 [45-280] 212 105 [52-284] .898
 System delay
  Attended by EMS 141 80 [65-98] 133 83 [65-99] .526
  Attended at hospitals 266 94 [71-131] 196 103.5 [80.5-133] .051
 Total ischemia time
  Attended by EMS 140 141 [115-193] 134 160.5 [125-231] .095
  Attended at hospital 265 239.5 [150-434] 192 239.5 [155–424] .790
Door-to-balloon time 309 20 [15-27] 295 22 [18-29] .041
10-day mortality 385 22 (5.7) 340 24 (7.1) .459

EMS, emergency medical system; pPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

Data are expressed as No. (%), mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range].

A similar reduction in STEMI admissions has already been reported in other settings.3, 4, 5 To our knowledge, this is the first study performed in Spain using individual patient data from a regional STEMI network. We observed a 50% reduction in STEMI admissions in 50 days and only slight differences in patient characteristics and delay times compared with patients admitted during the same period in 2019. Potential causes of this decrease in STEMI admissions include avoidance of medical care due to social distancing, STEMI underdiagnosis, and competing risk with the acquisition and severity of COVID-19, and warrant further investigation.

Acknowledgments

To all Codi IAM investigators: Josepa Mauri Ferré, Cardiología Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Pla Director de les Malalties Cardiovasculars, Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya; María Teresa Faixedas, Catsalut; Albert Ariza Sole, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge – IDIBELL; Xavier Carrillo Suárez, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol; Joan García Picart, Hospital de la Santa Creu i de Sant Pau; Rosa María Lidón Corbi, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron; Sergio Giovanny Rojas Lievano, Hospital Joan XXIII de Tarragona; Ander Regueiro, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona; Helena Tizón, Hospital del Mar. To Josep Ramon Marsal for statistical advice.

References

  • 1.Ibanez B., James S., Agewall S. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2018 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rodríguez-Leor O., Cid-Álvarez B., Ojeda S. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on interventional cardiology activity in Spain. REC Interv Cardiol. 2020;2:82–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tam C.C.F., Cheung K.S., Lam S. Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak on ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care in Hong Kong. China. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.De Filippo O., D’Ascenzo F., Angelini F. Reduced Rate of Hospital Admissions for ACS during Covid-19 Outbreak in Northern Italy. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2009166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garcia S., Albaghdadi M.S., Meraj P.M. Reduction in ST-Segment Elevation Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activations in the United States during COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista Espanola De Cardiologia (English Ed.) are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES