Abstract
The MYC oncogene drives T- and B- lymphoid malignancies, including Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL) and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). Here, we demonstrate a systemic reduction in natural killer (NK) cell numbers in SRα-tTA/Tet-O-MYCON mice bearing MYC-driven T-lymphomas. Residual mNK cells in spleens of MYCON T-lymphoma-bearing mice exhibit perturbations in the terminal NK effector differentiation pathway. Lymphoma-intrinsic MYC arrests NK maturation by transcriptionally repressing STAT1/2 and secretion of Type I Interferons (IFNs). Treating T-lymphoma-bearing mice with Type I IFN improves survival by rescuing NK cell maturation. Adoptive transfer of mature NK cells is sufficient to delay both T-lymphoma growth and recurrence post MYC inactivation. In MYC-driven BL patients, low expression of both STAT1 and STAT2 correlates significantly with the absence of activated NK cells and predicts unfavorable clinical outcomes. Our studies thus provide a rationale for developing NK cell-based therapies to effectively treat MYC-driven lymphomas in the future.
Subject terms: Cancer, Cancer microenvironment, Haematological cancer, Oncogenes, Tumour immunology
Oncogene addiction is considered as a cancer cell-autonomous phenomenon, but can also influence the host immune system. Here the authors show that MYC-driven lymphomagenesis is associated with a block in the maturation and effector functions of natural killer cells as a mechanism of tumor escape from immunosurveillance.
Introduction
Oncogene addiction is the phenomenon where cancers become dependent on a single ‘driver’ oncogene for proliferation and survival1,2. Inhibition of the driver forms the basis of oncogene-targeted therapy1–3. Hence, a potential vulnerability of human malignancies lies in their addiction to oncogenes including MYC, RAS and BCR-ABL14,5. Targeted therapy has been most successful against BCR-ABL1 (Philadelphia/Ph+)-induced leukemia6,7. To develop targeted therapies for MYC-driven cancers, it is vital to understand how MYC regulates cell-autonomous and non-autonomous processes, including host immunity. Oncogene addiction was assumed to be cell-autonomous and immune-independent8. Recent studies illustrate that MYC and other oncogenes alone or cooperatively regulate the tumor microenvironment and host immune responses in multiple tumor types9–16.
We use tractable approaches for studying the role of the host immunity during MYC-driven tumorigenesis through tetracycline (tet)-system regulated transgenic mouse models of cancer. These models enable us to understand how MYC inactivation elicits tumor regression through cancer-intrinsic and extrinsic host immune-dependent mechanisms1,10,15. CD4+ T cells appear to be essential for sustained cancer regression post MYC inactivation10. However, changes in immune landscape during primary MYC-induced tumorigenesis in these models remain to be delineated.
We aimed to delineate global immunological changes resulting from primary overt MYC-driven lymphomagenesis to identify anti-tumor immune subsets that can be developed as immunotherapies against MYC-driven lymphomas. We hypothesized that MYC directly perturbs host immunity at sites of lymphomagenesis to evade immune surveillance. Hence, using mass cytometry (CyTOF), we examine specific changes in the host immune composition upon MYC activation as well as after subsequent MYC inactivation in situ in SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice predisposed to developing MYC-driven T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma1.
We observe that MYC suppresses maturation of natural killer (NK) cells in the lymphoma microenvironment. We find that NK cells have a key anti-tumorigenic role by delaying the growth and recurrence of MYC-driven T-lymphomas, and are hence suppressed by MYC during lymphomagenesis. We show a direct signaling mechanism by which lymphoma-intrinsic MYC suppresses NK cell-mediated immune surveillance. Our results provide a rationale for developing and combining NK cell-based therapies with MYC inhibitors to treat MYC-driven lymphomas.
Results
MYC-driven lymphomas exhibit disrupted splenic architectures
We examined gross changes in spleen resulting from overt MYC-driven T-lymphomagenesis in SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice1. Of note, SRα restricts the overexpression of the human MYC (hMYC) transgene to the T cell lineage in SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice, giving rise to systemically disseminated T-lymphomas1. Lymphoma-bearing mice displayed splenic germinal center disruption, whereas MYC inactivation partially rescued the splenic architecture (Supplementary Fig. 1). Therefore, we speculated that MYC overexpression in T-lymphoma might remodel the splenic immune landscape.
Oncogenic MYC perturbs frequencies of splenic immune subsets
Inducible regulation of the hMYC transgene specifically in T-lymphoblasts enables us to elucidate how lymphoma-intrinsic MYC impacts normal immune cells during primary lymphomagenesis. Using CyTOF17, we delineated the global immunological changes in lymphoid organs during primary MYC-induced lymphomagenesis in SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice.
Splenic samples derived from overt lymphoma-bearing SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice before (MYCON) and after (MYCOFF, 96 h) MYC inactivation were examined for immune subsets; and compared to age- and strain-matched normal spleens (normal).
Consistent with the phenotype of T-lymphoma, the distribution of T-lymphocyte subsets was altered in the MYCON cohort with an increase in percentages of immature CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) CD3+ T-lymphoblasts as compared to normal mice. MYC inactivation resulted in elimination of most DP T-lymphoblasts and restored distribution of splenic T-subsets to normal levels, demonstrating MYC-addiction, as previously described1 (Fig. 1a–c, Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). T-lymphoblasts in MYCON mice are TCRαβ+, thus leading to a reduction in the percentages of TCRγδ+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. 2c, d).
We next examined other non-malignant immune compartments in MYCON and MYCOFF mice, and compared these to normal mice. The percentages of NK (CD3−NKp46+), NKT (CD3+NKp46+) and B cells (CD19+) were significantly lowered in MYCON mice, and were restored close to normal levels in MYCOFF mice (Fig. 1d, e, Supplementary Figs. 2e–g and 3a, b) The relative proportions of other immune compartments including dendritic cells (DCs) and neutrophils were unaltered by modulation of MYC (Supplementary Fig. 3c–f).
Immune changes in T-lymphomas are independent of splenomegaly
Lymphomagenesis is often associated with increased splenic cellularity. To rule out that the apparent reduction in NK and B cells was because they were being passively outnumbered by T-lymphoblasts, we measured the absolute cell numbers of immune subsets in splenic samples evaluated by CyTOF. We observed significant increases in the cellularity of lymphoma spleens (Fig. 1f). As expected, absolute counts of CD3+ pan T, TCRαβ+CD3+ T and immature DP CD3+ T-lymphoblasts were increased in MYCON mice when compared to normal and MYCOFF mice (Fig. 1g, Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Characteristic with lymphoma, multiplication of the TCRαβ+CD3+ T-lymphoblasts was accompanied by a significant reduction in CD3+TCRγδ+ T-lymphocyte numbers in MYCON mice (Supplementary Fig. 4c).
Oncogenic MYC significantly lowered numbers of CD3−NKp46+ NK and CD3+NKp46+ NKT cells, whereas MYC inactivation reversed this effect (Fig. 1h, Supplementary Fig. 4d). Despite reduction in B-lymphocyte frequency, numbers of B cells were unaltered in MYC-driven lymphomas as compared to normal and MYCOFF mice (Fig. 1i). MYC-driven lymphomagenesis significantly increased numbers of DCs and neutrophils (Supplementary Fig. 4e, f), corroborating the previously well-characterized pro-tumorigenic functions of these subsets in lymphomas18–20.
NK cells are specifically suppressed in MYC-driven T-lymphomas
Our goal was to identify anti-tumor immune subsets that can be developed as therapies against MYC-driven lymphomas21,22. As NK cells are attractive as a potential cell-based immunotherapy against MYC-driven lymphomas, we continued to focus specifically on how MYC alters the NK subset during lymphomagenesis. We confirmed our CyTOF results by measuring NK compositions before and after MYC inactivation by conventional flow cytometry (Supplementary Fig. 5). Next, using a computational method for estimating immune compositions from bulk gene expression data (CIBERSORT23), we calculated changes in NK composition in CyTOF-matched spleens from normal, SRα-tTA MYCON (lymphoma) and SRα-tTA MYCOFF (regressed lymphoma) mice. Concordant with CyTOF, CIBERSORT demonstrated a reduction in the relative proportion of NK cells in MYCON mice when compared to normal and MYCOFF mice (Supplementary Fig. 6). Hence, using three different platforms, we demonstrated that MYC causally and reversibly reduces splenic NK cell-mediated immune surveillance during lymphomagenesis (Fig. 1k).
NK cell suppression during MYC-driven lymphomagenesis is systemic in nature
We examined whether NK suppression occurs in other lymphoid tissues infiltrated by T-lymphoblasts, including blood and bone marrow. Circulating NK percentages, numbers per μl of blood and MFI of NKp46 were significantly reduced in overt lymphoma mice (MYCON), as compared to normal and MYC-inactivated (MYCOFF) mice (Fig. 2a–e). Like that observed in blood, CD3−NKp46+ NK cells were significantly suppressed in bone marrow of lymphoma-bearing mice (MYCON), as compared to normal and MYCOFF mice (Supplementary Fig. 7e, f).
NK cell suppression during lymphomagenesis is MYC-dependent
To demonstrate the dependency of NK suppression on MYC, we compared percentages and surface NKp46 expression of splenic and circulating NK cells in MYCOFF mice with residual blasts alongside lymphoma-bearing mice (MYCON) with similar blast percentages (Fig. 2f, i). The presence of residual lymphoblasts in MYCOFF mice may be attributed to either initial high disease burden before inactivating MYC, or partial differentiation of T-lymphoblasts after MYC inactivation24. MYC inactivation increases NK percentages (Fig. 2g, j) and the surface NKp46 (Fig. 2h, k) even in the presence of residual lymphoblasts. Hence, we infer that NK suppression is MYC-dependent, and does not occur simply due to the creation of space vacated by the clearance of lymphoblasts following MYC inactivation.
NK maturation is arrested during MYC-driven T-lymphomagenesis
We investigated whether reduction in NK cells during MYC-induced lymphomagenesis occurs because of increased cell death. Surprisingly, we observed reduced NK cell death in lymphoma-bearing MYCON mice, in comparison to normal and MYCOFF cohorts (Supplementary Fig. 8). Hence, we conclude that suppression of NK subset during lymphomagenesis is not caused by increased apoptosis of NK cells induced by lymphoma-intrinsic MYC.
The disappearance of NK cells from the bone marrow of MYCON mice suggested that MYC-driven lymphomagenesis might abrogate the replenishment of mature NK cells in the periphery possibly by blocking early NK cell development in the bone marrow25–28. Therefore, we compared the numbers of total NK (lin−CD122+), NK cell precursors (NKP, lin−CD122+NKp46−CD49b−), the more differentiated immature NK (iNK, lin−CD122+NKp46+CD49b−), and mature NK (mNK, lin−CD122+NKp46+CD49b+) cells in bone marrows of normal, SRα-tTA-MYCON (lymphoma), and SRα-tTA-MYCOFF (regressed lymphoma) mice. We observed reduction in numbers of total NK, NKP, iNK and mNK cells in the bone marrow of MYCON mice as compared to normal and MYCOFF groups (Fig. 3a–d), leading us to speculate that MYC-driven lymphomagenesis induces a block early in NK development before the NKP stage in the bone marrow. Examining the relative distributions of lin−CD122+ NK cells within the bone marrow, we observed that mNK percentages in the MYCON mice were below the homeostatic frequencies of mNK cells present in normal and MYCOFF which were also mirrored in the spleen (Fig. 3e–g). These findings suggest that the block in early NK development in the bone marrow results in a reduced supply of mNK cells that can be exported to peripheral organs including spleen.
mNK cells in the spleen undergo further differentiation to produce functional NK effectors in a 4-stage linear differentiation pathway: CD27−CD11b−, CD27+CD11b−, CD27+CD11b+ and CD27−CD11b+ 29,30. We therefore examined whether residual mNK cells in MYCON mice exhibit perturbations in the stages of terminal NK differentiation. Interestingly, we observed significant reduction in the frequencies of the least mature CD27−CD11b− fraction accompanied by concomitant increases in the most terminally differentiated CD27−CD11b+ mNK fraction in MYCON mice as compared to normal and MYCOFF mice (Fig. 3h, i). Hence, we conclude that the homeostatic frequencies of functional NK effector subsets are significantly impaired during MYC-driven T-lymphomagenesis. We speculate that the increase in frequency of the terminally differentiated CD27−CD11b+ mNK fraction in MYCON mice may imply a loss in NK cell functionality in addition to the reduction in numbers due to block in early NK development. Figure 3j shows changes that occur in early (bone marrow), and late (splenic) NK maturation during MYC-driven lymphomagenesis.
Surprisingly, we observed increased frequencies of the CD27−CD11b− and CD27+CD11b−, and decreased frequencies of CD27+CD11b+ and CD27-CD11b+ populations in control mice as compared to that shown in the literature29. We found this is a result of strain-mediated differences between C57BL/6J29, and FVB/N strains (background for SRα-tTA/Tet-O-MYC mice (Supplementary Fig. 9)).
To see whether the observed changes in NK maturation post MYC inactivation were not a result of doxycycline treatment as described previously31, FVB/N mice were treated with doxycycline doses identical to that required to inactivate MYC expression. NK cells were measured in bone marrow and spleen by flow cytometry. No significant changes were seen between doxycycline-treated and untreated control mice in any early NK subset (Supplementary Fig. 10a–h) or the expression of CD27 and CD11b on splenic mNK cells (Supplementary Fig. 10i, j). Therefore, changes in NK homeostasis after MYC modulation in SRα-tTA/Tet-O-MYC mice are a result of changes in MYC expression and not induced by doxycycline.
To investigate whether the observed suppression of NK maturation by MYC is confined to discrete lymphoid tissue microenvironments, we examined NK cell maturation in the liver and lung of MYCON mice. We observed infiltration of T-lymphoblasts in liver and lung of MYCON mice accompanied by reduction in percentages of total lin−CD122+ NK cells, and reduced mNK cell frequency within the lin−CD122+ NK fraction (Supplementary Figs. 11 and 12a–d), when compared to normal mice. We also observed perturbations in the differentiation of mNK cells into functional effectors in MYCON mice when compared to healthy mice (Supplementary Fig. 12e, f). Hence, NK cell maturation is perturbed in both lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues that exhibit infiltration of T-lymphoblasts. These findings strengthen our hypothesis that observed changes in NK surveillance during MYC-driven lymphomagenesis may be directly induced by MYC expression in lymphoblasts.
Suppression of Type I IFN by MYC may block NK surveillance
We next investigated the molecular mechanisms behind MYC-mediated suppression of NK surveillance during primary T- and B-lymphomagenesis, by analyzing transcriptomic profiles of bulk splenic cells from normal, SRα-tTA MYCON (lymphoma) and SRα-tTA MYCOFF (regressed lymphoma) mice (GSE106078). We observed that expression profiles of MYCOFF spleens clustered closely with normal spleens, thus confirming that transcriptional changes induced by MYC were largely reversible upon its inactivation (Fig. 4a). Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) revealed that the JAKs (Janus Kinases)—STAT1/2 (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1/2)— Type I IFN (Interferon) pathway was significantly suppressed in MYCON mice when compared to normal and MYCOFF mice (Fig. 4b–d).
Notably, the activation of STAT1/2 post MYC inactivation resembles an antiviral immune response associated with production of Type I IFNs and subsequent activation of NK cell-mediated immune surveillance32. STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling has been demonstrated to impact maturation and function of NK cells33–39. Compared to normal counterparts, mice deficient in Type I IFN receptor (IFNαR1/2−/−) show significantly lower splenic mNK cell frequencies33,36, a block in early NK maturation in the bone marrow before NKP stages35, and altered frequencies of mNK subsets in the NK effector differentiation pathway marked by changes in CD27 and CD11b36. We therefore speculated that reduced NK surveillance in MYCON mice may phenocopy mice deficient in components of the Type I IFN signaling cascade.
Concordant with NK suppression during MYC-driven lymphomagenesis, we observed transcriptional repression of many STAT1/2-Type I IFN regulated genes that are specific to NK-mediated immune surveillance in MYCON mice, when compared to normal and MYCOFF mice (Supplementary Fig. 13). This suggested the existence of a link between Type I IFN signature and the observed changes in splenic NK cell maturation.
Next, we compared transcript levels of STAT1, STAT2 and other Type I IFN signaling components in normal B cells (MYCLOW), pre-lymphoma B cells from Eμ-MYC mice (MYCHIGH), and overt B-cell lymphoma from Eμ-MYC mice (MYCHIGH), a mouse model of MYC-driven B-lymphoma (GSE5101140). Sequential increase in MYC during stepwise B-cell transformation was accompanied by transcriptional suppression of STAT1/2-Type I IFN signature (Supplementary Fig. 14). Hence, suppression of STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling is a signature of both T- and B- MYC-driven lymphomas.
MYC-driven suppression of NK cells is mediated by Type I IFN signaling
We investigated whether short-term (3 days) administration of Type I IFNα to SRα-tTA MYCON mice bearing overt T-lymphoma can rescue MYC-mediated NK suppression. The percentages and numbers of CD3−NKp46+ NK cells were significantly increased in IFNα-treated mice when compared to litter-matched vehicle-treated lymphoma mice (PBS) (Fig. 4e). Of note, numbers of WBC, CD3+ T cells and DP immature T cells remain unaltered between the control and IFNα-treated groups (Supplementary Fig. 15), suggesting that Type I IFNs specifically regulate NK cell homeostasis. Long-term administration of IFNα to MYCON overt T-lymphoma mice improves overall survival (OS) in comparison to vehicle (PBS)-treated lymphoma-bearing mice (Fig. 4f).
To address whether depleting NK cells during IFNα administration impacted OS, we treated overt T-lymphoma-bearing SRα-tTA MYCON mice with either anti-NK1.1 NK cell-depleting antibody or IgG2a control antibody in combination with recombinant IFNα. We observed that depleting NK cells shortened OS time in contrast to controls where NK cells were not depleted (Fig. 4g). Hence, we conclude that anti-tumor effects of Type I IFN are at least in part dependent on NK cells. These findings corroborate our earlier observations that Type I IFN exerts its anti-tumor effects by not directly acting on the T-lymphoblasts but rather on the host immune cells.
Finally, we interrogated the requirement of Type I IFN signaling in restoring homeostatic frequencies of NK fractions during MYC inactivation by treating overt T-lymphoma-bearing MYCON mice with IFNAR1 blocking or control antibody at the time of MYC inactivation, and examining splenic NK maturation after 4 days. We observed no differences in the numbers of total splenic lin−CD122+ NK cells, and the relative frequencies of NKP, iNK and mNK fractions within the lin−CD122+ subset between IFNAR1 blocking antibody-treated and control-treated groups (Supplementary Fig. 16). However, upon examining the frequencies of splenic mNK subsets, we observed a significant decrease in the frequency of CD27+CD11b+ effector cells upon blocking IFNAR1 during MYC inactivation (Fig. 4h, i). This indicates that albeit Type I IFN signaling is required for generating functional NK effectors during late stages of NK maturation, it is dispensable for early NK maturation and restoration of normal NK numbers post MYC inactivation. We conclude that MYC-driven lymphomagenesis may subvert normal immunological processes of NK cell homeostasis by suppressing STAT1/2 signaling cascade and Type I IFN production.
Oncogenic MYC suppresses Type I IFN production by tumor cells
Next, we investigated whether modulation of MYC in vitro in MYC-driven B- and T- lymphoma cell lines differentially regulates STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling. As Burkitt’s Lymphoma (BL) is a classic human MYC-associated lymphoma, we measured signaling changes by Phospho-CyTOF before (MYCON) and after (MYCOFF) MYC inactivation in an EBV-transformed human B-cell line that expresses MYC regulated by the Tet System (P493-6), and mimics BL41. We confirmed that MYC is inducibly expressed in P493-6 cells (Fig. 5a). Amongst immunoregulatory cytokine signaling pathways that operate through the JAKs and STATs, inactivation of MYC in P493-6 cells increased expression and activation of STAT1 compared to MYCON P493-6 cells (Fig. 5b–d, Supplementary Figs. 17, 18 and 19a). Transcription of STAT2, the binding partner of STAT1, was induced post MYC inactivation in P493-6 cells (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. 19b). Indeed, the transcript level of Type I IFNα2 was significantly elevated after MYC inactivation in P493-6 cells (MYCOFF, Fig. 5e). Cytokine profiling of the P493-6 cells pre- and post MYC inactivation demonstrated that the secretion of IFNα is significantly upregulated in MYCOFF cells in comparison to MYCON cells (Fig. 5f, Supplementary Fig. 20).
Tumor-intrinsic signaling changes post MYC inactivation in our T-lymphoma line derived from SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice (Supplementary Fig. 21) mirrored those observed in the human BL-like model with MYC inactivation leading to activation of STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling (Supplementary Figs. 22 and 23). Our findings suggested that lymphoma-intrinsic MYC represses STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling; thereby blocking the maturation of NK cells in the tumor microenvironment.
MYC transcriptionally represses STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling
We tested whether MYC transcriptionally represses the STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling cascade. Although widely known as a transactivator, MYC can inhibit gene transcription by sequestering transactivators including MIZ1 and Sp1/Sp342–44, and binding to Initiator (Inr) elements in gene promoters. For example, MYC inactivation releases MYC-MAX heterodimers from the binding sites of tumor suppressor genes such as Cdkn2b and Cdkn1b, thereby promoting MIZ1-mediated transcriptional activation of these genes42–44.
Concordant with a previous study where MYC was shown to transcriptionally repress STAT145, we found that MYC binds the STAT1 promoter in P493-6 human BL and mouse MYC-driven T-lymphoma (Supplementary Fig. 24). To delineate the molecular mechanism behind MYC-mediated transcriptional repression of Type I IFN signaling, we compared levels of STAT1, STAT2 and IFNα2 in MYC-driven lymphoma cell lines overexpressing MYC, or a MYC mutant that fails to sequester MIZ1 (MYC V394D), or the corresponding empty vector (EV). Although MYC overexpression in P493-6 cells repressed the production of STAT1/2 and IFNα2 (Fig. 5g–k, Supplementary Fig. 25), the MYC V394D mutant significantly rescued the activation of STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling, both before and after inactivation of tetracycline-controlled MYC (Tet-MYC). Our results show that MYC transcriptionally represses STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling partially by sequestering transcriptional activators such as MIZ1. In MYC-driven T-lymphoblasts, we observe that MYC-mediated suppression of the Type I IFN signaling cascade is independent of MIZ1 (Supplementary Figs. 26 and 27), suggesting the possible involvement of other MYC binding partners such as SP1/340.
MYCHigh human lymphomas suppress STAT1/2 and NK surveillance
We examined MYC-driven human lymphoma patients for evidence of repression of STAT1/2 signaling and NK cell-mediated immune surveillance. First, we analyzed human lymphomas that often exhibit MYC hyperactivation, such as Burkitt’s Lymphoma (BL) and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL, GSE447546). We observed that STAT1 and STAT2 transcripts inversely correlate with MYC transcript levels in BL and DLBCL patients (Fig. 6a, b). Of note, BL, which is driven by MYC translocations47 displays the highest MYC levels in combination with the lowest levels of STAT1 and STAT2. This indicates that natural addiction to MYC in BL might lead to the suppression of STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling.
Next, we analyzed whether separation of BL patients into four groups based on their median expressions of both STAT1 and STAT2 can predict clinical prognosis. We observed that patients with the lowest levels of both STAT1 and STAT2 had the most unfavorable clinical outcome (Fig. 6c). Furthermore, the majority (85%, 6/7) of BL patients with lowest levels of both STAT1 and STAT2 have no activated NK cells (Fig. 6d), estimated by CIBERSORT. We found that higher levels of activated NK cells in the BL patients were associated with a significantly favorable clinical outcome and prolonged survival (Fig. 6e). Hence, low expression of both STAT1 and STAT2 coincides with both NK cell suppression and poor overall survival in BL patients.
Finally, using CIBERSORT on bulk expression data, we compared the estimated fractions of NK cells in mononuclear cells isolated from blood of MYCHigh T-lymphoma patients (GSE62156)48,49 and healthy individuals23. Of note, MYC levels are significantly higher in T-lymphoma patients as compared to healthy individuals (Fig. 6f) because of chromosomal translocations that can potentially activate MYC48–54. We observed a significant suppression of STAT1 and STAT2 levels (Fig. 6g, h), and a reduction in total and activated NK cell subsets in T-lymphoma patients in comparison to their normal counterparts (Fig. 6i–l). Collectively, our findings suggest a common paradigm of NK suppression in both human and mouse MYC-driven lymphomas, which occurs in part due to the direct repression of the STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling cascade by the MYC oncogene.
NK cells as a potential therapy against MYC-driven lymphomas
Our findings suggest that subversion of NK surveillance is critical for MYC-driven lymphomagenesis. Therefore, we investigated whether NK cells can be developed as an immunotherapy against MYC-driven lymphomas by interrogating the requirement and sufficiency of NK cells in MYC-driven lymphoma initiation, and recurrence post MYC inactivation.
To examine the requirement of NK cells in blocking lymphoma growth in transgenic MYC-driven T-lymphoma mice, we depleted NK cells in 4-week-old SRα-tTA-MYCON mice prior to overt lymphoma development at 8–12 weeks, and compared these to control mice. We observed that 100% of NK-depleted mice succumbed to aggressive lymphomas accompanied by splenomegaly, whereas control mice showed a heterogeneous pattern of disease severity with only 50% of these developing splenomegaly (Supplementary Fig. 28a, c). Comparison of disease-free survival (DFS) Probabilities indicated slightly prolonged survival in the control group in comparison to the NK-depleted group albeit not statistically significant (Supplementary Fig. 28a). We predict that increasing the sample sizes to include more mice per group could lead to statistically significant changes in DFS between the two groups. Of note, we observed a statistically significant increase in the survival probabilities of control mice when morbidity was measured as a function of splenomegaly which indicates high disease severity (Supplementary Fig. 28b). Hence, we conclude that NK cells are important for blocking MYC-driven lymphomagenesis.
We further corroborated the requirement of NK cells in slowing down T-lymphoma growth by injecting intravenously luciferase-labeled MYCON T-lymphoblasts derived from an SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mouse (Supplementary Fig. 21) into recipients with (NOD SCID) or without (NOD SCID IL-2Rγ−/−, NSG) NK and other innate lymphoid cells. Lymphoma onset (day 5 for NSG and day 18 for NOD SCID), and median morbidity (day 10 for NSG and day 20 for NOD SCID) of mice were significantly delayed in NOD SCID transplant recipients (Fig. 7a, b). T-lymphomas eventually engrafted in the bone marrow of NOD SCID mice where NK cells are present (Fig. 7a). We infer that although NK surveillance initially blocks MYC-driven lymphomagenesis, continued MYC expression eventually suppresses NK cells to establish lymphomas, as seen in primary SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice.
Engraftment of T-lymphoma at sites with NK surveillance such as the bone marrow (Fig. 7a, BLI image day 18 post injection) suggested that NK cell-mediated allogeneic rejection is an unlikely explanation for delayed lymphoma engraftment in NOD SCID mice. However, to rule this out, we transplanted syngeneic mature NK cells (CD3−NKp46+) obtained from healthy normal FVB/N mice (Supplementary Fig. 29) into NSG mice 3 days before (d-3) T cell lymphoma transplantation (d0). We observed significantly delayed T-lymphoma initiation in transplant recipients that received syngeneic NK cells compared to transplant recipients that received vehicle (Fig. 7c, d). Hence, NK cells alone are sufficient to slow down the growth of MYC-driven lymphomas. Of note, despite delayed lymphoma initiation in transplant recipients that received NK cells, systemic lymphoma eventually develops consistent with our previous findings that, once established, MYC-driven lymphomas promote NK cell suppression.
MYC-driven lymphomas recur post MYC inactivation with 100% penetrance in immune-deficient hosts (NSG) in comparison to immune-competent hosts where MYC inactivation sustains lymphoma regression10,55. We investigated whether NK cells are sufficient to delay lymphoma recurrence post MYC inactivation. Syngeneic NK cells (CD3−NKp46+) from normal mice when adoptively-transferred into T-lymphoma-bearing NSG recipients at the time of MYC inactivation delayed lymphoma recurrence and prolonged OS (Fig. 7e–g) when compared to vehicle-treated controls. Thus, adoptive transfer of NK cells alone is sufficient to sustain lymphoma regression post MYC inactivation.
Collectively, our results suggest that NK cells have an important anti-tumorigenic role in MYC-driven lymphoms, hence making NK cell-based immune therapies an attractive treatment strategy against such malignancies.
Discussion
Mapping perturbations in immune subsets during primary tumorigenesis is crucial for identifying cancer immunotherapies. Through CyTOF, we delineated the immune signature of MYC-driven T-lymphomas before and after MYC inactivation. We identified a mechanism by which MYC directly suppresses NK surveillance. MYC-dependent suppression of NK cells was highly specific as other anti-tumorigenic immune subsets were not altered in numbers by MYC modulation (Fig. 1, Supplementary Figs. 2–4). Our results are consistent with a recent report where MYC has been shown to promote NK cell exclusion in adenocarcinomas11.
We found that mice bearing overt MYC-driven T-lymphomas suppress early NK cell development in bone marrow (Fig. 3a–e). We show that such an early developmental arrest in NK maturation translates to the periphery, possibly due to the reduced export of mNK cells to organs including spleen, liver and lung (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Figs. 11a and 12a–d). We show that mNK cells in MYCON mice exhibit altered frequencies of the subsets of effector NK differentiation pathway29,30, suggesting that NK function may be impaired in MYC-driven lymphomas. We found that MYC inactivation significantly reverses the defects both in early and late stages of NK development observed in MYCON mice (Fig. 3h). Hence, we infer that MYC-driven lymphomas evade NK surveillance by blocking NK cell maturation, and inhibiting MYC is essential for reversing this developmental blockade and eliciting an NK cell-mediated response against “MYC-addicted” tumors. Arrest in NK maturation has been demonstrated to be a critical mechanism of immune escape in cancers27,28. We demonstrate that overexpression of MYC in lymphoblasts orchestrates such arrest in NK development in the lymphoma microenvironment.
We show that MYC-driven lymphomas evade NK surveillance by transcriptionally repressing the STAT1/2-Type I IFN signaling (Fig. 5g–k, Supplementary Figs. 24–27) required for NK cell maturation33–39. MYCHigh lymphoblasts show suppressed Type I IFN production (Fig. 5e, f, Supplementary Figs. 20 and 22), which in turn perturbs NK maturation in the lymphoma microenvironment. We find that MYC-driven human lymphomas are associated with concomitant suppression of STAT1/2 and NK exclusion (Fig. 6).
Although we observe that MYC overexpression alters secretion of Type I IFNs from the B/T-lymphoblasts, we do not exclude the possibility that IFN secretion from other immune cells including dendritic cells (DCs) may be perturbed. Of note, we observe reductions in IL15 and IL15R in MYCON mice (Supplementary Fig. 13). IL15 is essential for NK maturation and is primarily secreted by DCs following their activation by Type I IFNs56, suggesting that loss of Type IFN secretion by MYC-transformed lymphocytes may affect DC maturation57, consequently reduce IL15 secretion from DCs and block NK maturation. Consistent with previous studies showing an increase in DCs numbers and a block in DC maturation in MYC-driven B-lymphomas18, we show that DC numbers are significantly increased in MYCON mice (Supplementary Fig. 4e). The consequences of phenotypic and functional changes in DCs and their effects on IL15 and NK maturation during MYC-induced lymphomagenesis remain to be explored.
Type I IFN treatment restored NK cell production in spleens of lymphoma-bearing mice (Fig. 4e). IFN treatment combined with NK depletion shortened time to morbidity of MYCON mice (Fig. 4g). Hence, MYC suppresses the STAT1/2-Type I IFN cascade and blocks NK surveillance (Supplementary Fig. 30). In addition to their use as antiviral agents, Type I IFNs elicit anti-proliferative effects on cancer cells37,58. Our study explains why MYC-driven B-lymphoma lines are sensitive to Type I IFN therapy59, and illustrates new functional roles for Type I IFN therapy in lymphomas.
We observed that blocking IFNAR1 at the time of MYC inactivation compromised the production of CD27+CD11b+ NK effectors without suppressing the replenishment of mNK cells in the spleen (Fig. 4h, Supplementary Fig. 16). Restoration of homeostatic levels of mNK cells in MYCOFF mice despite IFNAR1 blockade might be explained by the activation of pathways independent of Type I IFN signaling that can induce NK maturation upon MYC inactivation.
Prior studies have shown that specific NK receptor–ligand interactions mediate the recognition of tumors by NK cells and can block MYC-driven lymphomagenesis60,61. Transcript levels of NKG2D (KLRK1) were reduced in MYCON lymphoma mice and restored to normal levels in MYCOFF mice (Supplementary Fig. 13), suggesting suppression of NKG2DL on MYC-driven lymphoblasts. Therefore, multiple mechanisms of MYC-mediated suppression of NK surveillance may be at play during lymphomagenesis.
Our results have important implications for cancer immunotherapy62. We observed that adoptively-transferred NK cells significantly delayed MYC-driven lymphomagenesis, and contributed to sustained lymphoma regression post MYC inactivation (Fig. 7), suggesting that MYC-driven lymphomas may be particularly sensitive to NK cell-based therapies. Most conventional chemotherapies used for lymphoma are immunosuppressive. Therapies that are directed at restoring the immune response may be particularly effective against MYC-driven lymphoma. Our findings underscore the importance of identifying MYC inhibitors63 and combining these with NK cell-based therapies64–66 to achieve maximum therapeutic benefit. We suggest that, as others and we investigate potential therapeutic candidates that target MYC, it will be essential to consider the role of NK cell-mediated immune surveillance in defining the modes of therapy; and to identify the characteristics, timing and dosage of NK cells for maximum therapeutic benefit.
Methods
Cell lines and cell culture
Conditional MYC-driven mouse T cell lymphoma cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 21) were derived from SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice. c-MYC was inhibited in SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC T-lymphoma cells by treating cell cultures with 0.02 μg/ml doxycycline (Sigma-Aldrich, T7660) for 4, 8, 24 and 48 h. BL-like human P493-6 cells were kindly provided by Chi Van Dang, University of Pennsylvania. For c-MYC inactivation in P493-6 cells, the conditional pmyc-tet construct was repressed with 0.1 μg/ml doxycycline (Sigma-Aldrich, T7660) for 24 h. Cell lines were confirmed to be negative for mycoplasma contamination and maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium (RPMI, Invitrogen) with GlutaMAX containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.
Animals
All procedures were approved by the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care (APLAC) at Stanford University, and were carried out in accordance with institutional and national guidelines. The following strains of mice were used in the study: FVB/N (males, 8–12 weeks), SRα-tTA/Tet-O-MYC mice (males, 8–12 weeks), NOD SCID (males, 4–8 weeks), NOD SCID IL2Rγ−/− (males, 4–8 weeks), FVB/N (males, 4–8 weeks) and C57BL6J (males, 4–8 weeks). Animals were raised and housed at Stanford University and maintained at 18–23 °C, 40–60% humidity and at 12-h light/12-h dark cycle.
Isolation and processing of immune cells from mice
We used young male mice (8–12 weeks of age). The following strains of mice were used: SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice and the corresponding FVB/N wildtype strain. The SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC males developed T cell lymphoma at ~2–3 months of age. Diseased mice were identified based on the presence of visible symptoms of T cell lymphoma development; namely, loss of weight and appetite, ruffled fur, shortness of breath and movement difficulties and killed within 24 h of development of one or more of these symptoms. Half the number of male littermates that developed T cell lymphoma were subjected to doxycycline treatment to inactivate MYC. For T cell lymphoma mice subject to MYC inactivation, one starter dose of doxycycline was given intraperitoneally, after which, the mice continuously received doxycycline for 4 days in their drinking water. Leukemic littermates from each cage were randomly and equally divided between MYCON/HIGH (untreated) or MYCOFF/LOW (doxycycline-treated) groups. Spleens, blood and bone marrow were isolated from the three mice groups, namely, SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC (MYCON/HIGH), SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC + Doxycycline (MYCOFF/LOW) and normal healthy (FVB/N) controls. Blood was drawn by cardiac puncture after euthanizing the mice, and directly subjected to erythrocyte lysis. Bone marrow was obtained by either flushing the cavities of femur and tibia with PBS or by centrifugation of the bones at 1600 × g for 3 min after they have been cut in both ends. Spleen and bone marrow were homogenized using a 191/2 G needle and filtered through a 70 µm filter. After depletion of erythrocytes from spleen, blood and bone marrow using RBC lysis buffer (BD PharmLyse, BD Biosciences) or ACK lysing buffer (Gibco), washed cells were cryopreserved and utilized for CyTOF or flow cytometry. For processing of liver and lung cells, the mice were perfused with PBS through first the right ventricle to perfuse the lung followed by the left ventricle and the vena cava inferior to perfuse the liver. Dissected liver and lung were cut into small pieces and digested in HBSS with Ca++ and Mg++ (Corning) containing 2 mg/ml Collagenase IV (Worthington) and 0.2 mg/ml DNase I (Roche) using the gentle MACS Octo Dissociator (MACS Miltenyi). Cell suspension was filtered through a 70-µm cell strainer and treated with ACK lysis buffer (ThermoFisher). The cells were utilized for flow cytometry immediately after processing. No blinding was done while executing the animal experiments.
Mass cytometry (CyTOF Immunophenotyping)
This assay was performed in the Human Immune Monitoring Center at Stanford University. Mouse splenocytes were thawed in warm media, washed twice, resuspended in CyFACS buffer (PBS supplemented with 2% BSA, 2 mM EDTA and 0.1% sodium azide). Viable cells were then counted by Vicell. Cells were added to a V-bottom microtiter plate at 1 million viable cells per well and washed once by pelleting and resuspension in fresh CyFACS buffer. The cells were stained for 60 min on ice with 50 µl of the following antibody-polymer conjugate cocktail (Supplementary Table 1). All antibodies were custom-ordered metal-conjugates from Fluidigm (Supplementary Table 1). The cells were washed twice; by pelleting and resuspension with 500 µl FACS buffer. The cells were resuspended in 100 µl PBS buffer containing 1.7 µg/ml Live-Dead (DOTA-maleimide (Macrocyclics) containing natural-abundance indium). The cells were washed twice by pelleting and resuspension with 500 µl CyFACS buffer. The cells were resuspended in 100 µl 2% PFA in PBS and placed at 4 °C overnight. The next day, the cells were pelleted and washed by resuspension in fresh PBS. The cells were resuspended in 100 µl eBiosciences permeabilization buffer (1× in PBS) and placed on ice for 45 min before washing twice with 500 µl CyFACS buffer. The cells were resuspended in 100 µl iridium-containing DNA intercalator (1:2000 dilution in PBS; DVS Sciences) and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The cells were washed once in CyFACS buffer, then three times in 500 µl Milli-Q water. The cells were diluted to a concentration of ~800,000 cells/ml in Milli-Q water containing 0.1× EQ normalization beads (Fluidigm) before injection into the CyTOF (Fluidigm). Data analysis was performed using FlowJo v10 by gating on intact cells based on the Iridium vs Ce140 (bead), then both Iridium isotopes from the intercalator, then on singlets by Ir191 vs cell length, then on live cells (Indium-LiveDead minus population), followed by cell subset-specific gating (Supplementary Fig. 31). The data was analyzed using FlowJo X 10.0.7r2 and viSNE (Cytobank Inc.).
Phospho-CyTOF
The harvested cells were suspended in 16% PFA and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. After washing with CyFACS buffer (1× CyPBS with 0.1% BSA, and 0.05% Na Azide; made in Milli-Q water), surface staining was performed by incubating the cells with the surface-staining antibody cocktail (Supplementary Table 2) at room temperature for 30 min. The cells were then washed with CyFACS buffer and permeabilized before carrying out intracellular staining. The cells were then incubated with the intracellular antibody cocktail (Supplementary Table 2) at room temperature for 30 min. After washing with CyPBS, the cells were incubated with Ir-intercalator solution on ice for 20 min. The samples were then washed with Milli-Q water and acquired on the CyTOF instrument using standard instrument set up procedures. The data was analyzed using FlowJo X 10.0.7r2.
Flow cytometry
All antibodies for flow cytometry measurements are indicated in Supplementary Table 3. All antibodies were titrated prior to use to determine the dilution to use for optimal staining index. Multicolor flow cytometry staining was performed according to standard procedures for surface staining and the cells were blocked with Rat anti-mouseCD16/32 Fc block (BD Pharmingen). Cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI, Sigma-Aldrich) or LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR Dead Cell Stain kit (ThermoFisher) to gate out dead cells. Labeled cells were analyzed on a FACSCalibur or a 5-laser LSRII (Becton Dickinson). Compensation was done using Ultracomp eBeads Compensation Beads (Invitrogen) and ArC Amine Reactive Compensation Bead Kit (ThermoFisher). The data were analyzed using FlowJo X 10.0.7r2. Gating strategy is provided in Supplementary Fig. 31.
Calculation of absolute immune cell counts
Viable cells were counted using a Vicell before subjecting the single cell suspensions of spleen, blood and bone marrow to CyTOF or flow cytometry, respectively. Using the percentages of the immune populations calculated by CyTOF and flow cytometry on the same day, absolute viable cell numbers of the different immune subsets were computed.
RNA sequencing
A part of the splenic single cell suspensions from normal (FVB/N, n = 3), SRα-tTA MYCON (n = 3) and SRα-tTA MYCOFF (n = 3) mice subjected to CyTOF were used to generate RNA. RNA sequencing was performed at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) using the BGISEQ-500 instrument. The experimental pipeline is described below.
For library preparation, oligo (dT) magnetic beads were used to select mRNA with polyA tail, or hybridize the rRNA with DNA probe and digest the DNA/RNA hybrid strand, followed by DNase I reaction to remove DNA probe. After obtaining the target RNA, it was fragmented and reverse transcribed to double-strand cDNA (dscDNA) by N6 random primer. The dscDNA was end repaired with phosphate at 5′ end and stickiness ‘A’ at 3′ end. The adaptor with stickiness ‘T’ at 3′ end was ligated to the dscDNA. Two specific primers were used to amplify the ligation product. The PCR product was then denatured and the single strand DNA was cyclized by splint oligo and DNA ligase. Sequencing was then performed on the prepared library.
Primary sequencing data (raw reads) were subjected to quality control (QC). After QC, raw reads were filtered into clean reads before alignment to the reference sequences. Once alignment passed QC, we proceeded with downstream analysis including gene expression and deep analysis based on gene expression (PCA/correlation/screening differentially expressed genes). Data were filtered reads with adaptors, reads with >10% unknown bases and low-quality reads. Bowtie 2 was used to map clean reads to reference gene, and HISAT was used to map reads to reference genome (mm8). RSEM was used to compute maximum likelihood abundance estimates using the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. FPKM method was used to calculate the expression levels of individual genes. RNA-sequencing data are provided in Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE106078).
CIBERSORT
Human CIBERSORT was carried out at https://cibersort.stanford.edu/ using LM22 reference matrix of gene expression in human immune subsets (19). For CIBERSORT of splenic immune compositions in normal (FVB/N), SRα-tTA MYCON and SRα-tTA MYCOFF mice, a reference matrix was generated using ImmGen (https://www.immgen.org/, GSE15907). CIBERSORT was carried out on CyTOF-matched normal (n = 3), SRα-tTA MYCON (n = 3) and SRα-tTA MYCOFF (n = 3) samples.
Transplantation of T-lymphoma and bioluminescence imaging
A MYC-addicted T cell lymphoma cell line derived from a male SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mouse (Supplementary Fig. 21) was labeled with luciferase. 3 × 106 luciferase-labeled T cell lymphoma cells were then injected intravenously into two groups of immune-deficient hosts: NOD SCID (The Jackson Laboratory) and NOD-SCIDIL-2Rγ−/− (NSG). Male transplant recipients used were between 4 and 5 weeks of age. Leukemic engraftment and progression were tracked by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of the transplant recipients twice every week using an in vivo IVIS 100 bioluminescence/optical imaging system (Xenogen). d-Luciferin (Promega) dissolved in PBS was injected intraperitoneally at a dose of 2.5 mg per mouse 15 min before measuring the luminescence signal. General anesthesia was induced with 3% isoflurane and continued during the procedure with 2% isoflurane introduced through a nose cone. No blinding was done while executing the animal experiments. Bioluminescence imaging data were analyzed using Living Image software (Perkin Elmer). All mouse experiments were approved by the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care (APLAC) at Stanford University, and were carried out in accordance with institutional and national guidelines.
Adoptive transfer of NK cells into T-lymphoma-bearing mice
3 × 106 luciferase-labeled T cell lymphoma cells were injected intravenously into 4–8-week-old NSG mice (n = 19). Post verification of T cell lymphoma engraftment by BLI, all mice were treated with doxycycline to inactivate MYC. 10 of the 19 mice were subjected to adoptive transfer of NK cells isolated from spleens of 4–8-week-old FVB/N mice by magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS, NK Cell Isolation Kit II, Miltenyi Biotech). Flow cytometry was performed to confirm the purity of the isolated NK cells. 1 × 106 MACS purified NK cells were injected per mouse into NSG transplant recipients bearing regressed T cell lymphoma (on doxycycline, MYCOFF).
Type I IFN treatment, NK depletion and IFNAR1 blockade
20,000U of Type I IFNα (R&D systems) was administered intraperitoneally to SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice bearing overt lymphoma for 3 days. On day 3, spleens from treated mice were collected, and subjected to flow cytometry for NK and T cell analysis. PBS-treated mice were used as controls. Absolute cell counts were obtained as described in section ‘Calculation of absolute immune cell counts’. For long-term administration of Type I IFNα, the mice were treated every third day with 20,000 U IFNα or PBS intraperitoneally. 100 µg anti-NK1.1 (clone PK136, BioXCell) or IgG2a control (Clone C1.18.4, BioXCell) were administered intraperitoneally every sixth day to deplete NK cells. 2.5 mg anti-IFNAR1 (clone MAR1-6A3, Leinco) or IgG1 control (clone HKSP, Leinco) were administered intraperitoneally to block IFNAR1 in SRα-tTA/tet-O-MYC mice bearing overt lymphoma at the same time as the mice were subjected to MYC inactivation with doxycycline treatment. After 4 days, spleen was collected and subjected to flow cytometry for NK and T cell analysis.
Immunoblotting
Cells were lysed in CelLytic buffer (Sigma) supplemented with 1% protease inhibitor ‘cocktail’ (Pierce). Protein samples were subsequently separated by electrophoresis through NuPAGE (Invitrogen) 4–12% Bis-Tris gradient gels or 4–12% pre-cast XT-Criterion gradient gels (Biorad, Hercules, CA), and were then transferred to PVDF membranes (Immobilion; Millipore). Afterwards, blots were blocked in 5% milk in TBST and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (Supplementary Table 4). After incubation with primary antibodies, blots were washed with 0.1% TBST three times for 10 minutes each, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit antibodies, ThermoFisher Scientific) conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (AP) in 5% milk in TBST at room temperature for an hour. Washing was repeated as above, and blots were visualized using Novex™ AP Chemiluminescent Substrate (CDP-Star™) (ThermoFisher Scientific). Blots were developed either on films or on Biorad Chemodoc MP Imaging system with Image Lab 5.1 software.
Retrovirus production and transduction
Transfection of retroviral constructs (Supplementary Table 5) was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with Opti-MEM media (Invitrogen). Retroviral supernatants for infection of cells were generated after co-transfection of Phoenix cells containing the plasmids pHIT60 (gag-pol) and pHIT123 (ecotropic envelope) (provided by G.P. Nolan), with the retroviral constructs. Cells were cultured in high-glucose DMEM (Invitrogen) with GlutaMAX containing 10% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids. Serum-free medium was replaced after 16 h with growth medium containing 10 mM sodium butyrate. After 8 h of incubation, the medium was changed back to growth medium without sodium butyrate. Twenty-four hours later, we harvested the viral supernatants, passed them through a 0.45-μm filter and centrifuged them twice at 2000 × g for 90 min at 32 °C on 50 μg/ml RetroNectin-coated non-tissue culture-treated six-well plates. Pre-B cells (2 × 106–3 × 106 cells per well) were transduced by centrifugation at 600 × g for 30 min and were maintained overnight at 37 °C with 5% CO2 before transfer into culture flasks. All retroviral work was carried out in a BSL2 laboratory with a designated hood for virus production and transduction.
Lentivirus production and transduction
Lentiviral (Supplementary Table 5) transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with Opti-MEM media (Invitrogen). We produced lentiviral supernatants to infect murine cells by co-transfecting HEK 293FT cells with the plasmids psPAX2 (gag-pol; Didier Trono, Addgene 12260) and pMD2.G (VSV-G envelope; Didier Trono, Addgene 12259). Cells were cultivated in high-glucose DMEM (Invitrogen) with GlutaMAX as described above. Culture supernatants were concentrated with Lenti-X™ Concentrator (Clontech) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. The concentrated viruses were incubated with the cells for 50 µg/ml RetroNectin-coated non- tissue culture-treated 6−well plates. All lentiviral work was carried out in a BSL2 laboratory with a designated hood for virus production and transduction.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out with the SYBRGreenER mix from Invitrogen according to standard PCR conditions and an ABI7900HT real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Primers for quantitative RT-PCR are in Supplementary Table 6.
Immunohistochemistry
Spleens and thymuses obtained from experimental mice were immersed in 20 ml of formalin (VWR) for 24 h and transferred to PBS. Paraffin embedding was carried out using standard procedures on a Tissue-TEK VIP processor (Miles Scientific), and 4 μm sections were mounted on Apex superior adhesive slides (Leica Microsystems) and stained on a Ventana BenchMark automated IHC stainer. Immunohistochemistry sections were mounted with mounting medium, antifade reagent (Pro-Long Gold; Invitrogen) was applied, and coverslips were sealed before acquisition of images at 25 °C on a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M inverted confocal microscope with a 40 Plan Neofluor objective using IP Lab 4.0 software (Scanalytics).
ChIP-sequencing analysis
Raw ChIP-sequencing files were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, GSE44672, GSE36354, Supplementary Fig. 22). The FASTQ Groomer in Galaxy Software (https://usegalaxy.org/) was used to generate files that were mapped to the RefSeq database for mouse genes (mm9). The resulting bigWig files processed from Galaxy were visualized in Integrated Genome Viewer (IGV_2.3.72).
Statistics and reproducibility
CyTOF, flow cytometry and CIBERSORT results are shown as box plots and comparisons between any two groups were made using two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test (not assuming normal distributions) with Graphpad Prism software. For all box plots, the center is at the median, minima and maxima are indicated by the whiskers, and the box represents data between 25th and 75th percentile. All remaining data are presented as mean ± s.d. The comparisons for the mean values between two sample groups were made using the two-tailed Student’s t-test after calculating variances for each group with Graphpad Prism software. For experiments involving transplantation of cells into mice, the minimal number of mice in each group was calculated using the ‘cpower’ function in the R/Hmisc package (http://www.r-project.org). The Kaplan–Meier method was used for estimation of overall survival and relapse-free survival. For all survival analyses, the log-rank test was used to compare groups of transplanted mice or human patients. The R package ‘survival’ version 2.35–8 was used for the survival analysis. All p-values are two-tailed. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. p-values: ns = non- significant; all significant p-values are indicated in the manuscript.
For experiments involving primary T-lymphoma mice, reproducibility of the results was ensured by drawing mice from at least three independent breeding pairs for each experiment. Successful replication of experiments was ensured by using multiple methodologies to ensure that the same result was obtained. For example, CyTOF, CIBERSORT and flow cytometry were performed on FVB/N, MYCON and MYCOFF mice to ensure that changes in NK cell homeostasis are reproducible irrespective of the methodology used. For each of these experiments, we used both matched and independent samples to ensure reproducibility. All in vitro experiments were conducted with at least two different biological replicates, drawn from independent batches/passages of cells. For qPCR studies, each biological replicate was run as three technical replicates to account for handling errors. For immunoblots, a representative of two biological replicates is shown. To further ensure rigor, cross comparison of the results was conducted between two different experimental methods that provide the same readout. For example, phospho-CyTOF changes were validated by immunoblotting. qPCR results for some experiments were further validated using RNA sequencing or publicly available microarray data from GEO. For in vivo and in vitro studies, all attempts at replication were successful. Meta-analyses of publicly available data were conducted in both T-lymphoma and B-lymphoma to further strengthen our studies showing that NK cells have an anti-tumorigenic role in both B- and T- lymphomas.
Institutional approval
All mouse experiments were approved by the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care (APLAC) at Stanford University, and were carried out in accordance with institutional and national guidelines.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank M. D. Leipold, R. Fernandez and Y. Rosenberg-Hasson at the Human Immune Monitoring Center, Stanford University for Luminex, CyTOF and Phospho-CyTOF acquisition. We also thank P. Chu in the Department of Pathology at Stanford University for carrying out tissue sectioning; H. Dai for technical help; A. Gentles for providing us access to PRECOG data sets; and M. Eilers for gifting us lentiviral overexpression plasmids for the study. We thank M. Eilers for his expert scientific guidance and suggestions. This work was supported by the following grants: NIH/NCI CA170378PQ2 (D.W.F.), 1U01CA188383-01/S1 (D.W.F.), Emerson Collective Cancer Research Fund (D.W.F.), the Special Fellow Award LLS 3366-17 from The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (S.S.) and American Society of Hematology Scholar Award (S.S.). A.S.H. was funded by Grant 8026-00018B from Independent Research Fund Denmark, L.D.H. was funded by the Lundbeck Foundation, Denmark, R.D was funded by K08 National Cancer Institute (CA222676), and D.F.L. was supported by Tumor Biology Training Grant (NIH 5T32CA009151-38), Stanford University (National Cancer Institute), Burroughs Wellcome Fund Postdoctoral Enrichment Award and Research Supplement Award (National Cancer Institute).
Author contributions
S.S. and D.W.F. conceived the study. S.S. and A.S.H. developed experimental methodology, conducted experiments and interpreted results. L.D.H., A.D., W.D.M.F., D.F.L., C.H., A.M. and M.L. performed experiments. R.D. performed analysis and interpretation of RNA-sequencing results. H.T.M. provided helpful scientific input on the manuscript. S.S., A.S.H. and D.W.F. wrote the manuscript. S.S., H.T.M. and D.W.F. provided administrative, technical and material support. D.W.F. supervised the study.
Data availability
We employed previously published data sets available in GEO to conduct CIBERSORT of human B- and T-ALL patients as described in Fig. 6. The following data sets were used: GSE4475 (Fig. 6a–e), GSE62156 (Fig. 6f–h) and GSE11057/GSE11058 (Fig. 6f–h). RNA-sequencing data of bulk splenic samples from normal, SRα-tTA MYCON and SRα-tTA MYCOFF mice generated by us (Fig. 4a–d) can be accessed in GEO (GSE106078). All other relevant data are available in the Article, Supplementary Information or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Srividya Swaminathan, Aida S. Hansen.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-020-16447-7.
References
- 1.Felsher DW, Bishop JM. Reversible tumorigenesis by MYC in hematopoietic lineages. Mol. Cell. 1999;4:199–207. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80367-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Weinstein IB. Cancer. Addiction to oncogenes—the Achilles heal of cancer. Science. 2002;297:63–64. doi: 10.1126/science.1073096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Felsher DW. Cancer revoked: oncogenes as therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2003;3:375–380. doi: 10.1038/nrc1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jain M, et al. Sustained loss of a neoplastic phenotype by brief inactivation of MYC. Science. 2002;297:102–104. doi: 10.1126/science.1071489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Letai AG. Diagnosing and exploiting cancer’s addiction to blocks in apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008;8:121–132. doi: 10.1038/nrc2297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Goldman JM, Melo JV. Chronic myeloid leukemia—advances in biology and new approaches to treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349:1451–1464. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra020777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Druker BJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:1031–1037. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104053441401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sharma SV, Settleman J. Oncogene addiction: setting the stage for molecularly targeted cancer therapy. Genes Dev. 2007;21:3214–3231. doi: 10.1101/gad.1609907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ancrile B, Lim K-H, Counter CM. Oncogenic Ras-induced secretion of IL6 is required for tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1714–1719. doi: 10.1101/gad.1549407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rakhra K, et al. CD4(+) T cells contribute to the remodeling of the microenvironment required for sustained tumor regression upon oncogene inactivation. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:485–498. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kortlever RM, et al. Myc cooperates with Ras by programming inflammation and immune suppression. Cell. 2017;171:1301–1315.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Topper MJ, et al. Epigenetic therapy ties MYC depletion to reversing immune evasion and treating lung cancer. Cell. 2017;171:1284–1300.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reimann M, et al. Tumor stroma-derived TGF-beta limits myc-driven lymphomagenesis via Suv39h1-dependent senescence. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:262–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sparmann A, Bar-Sagi D. Ras-induced interleukin-8 expression plays a critical role in tumor growth and angiogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:447–458. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Casey SC, et al. MYC regulates the antitumor immune response through CD47 and PD-L1. Science. 2016;352:227–231. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Borrello MG, et al. Induction of a proinflammatory program in normal human thyrocytes by the RET/PTC1 oncogene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:14825–14830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503039102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Spitzer MH, et al. Immunology. An interactive reference framework for modeling a dynamic immune system. Science. 2015;349:1259425. doi: 10.1126/science.1259425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rehm A, et al. Dendritic cell-mediated survival signals in Eμ-Myc B-cell lymphoma depend on the transcription factor C/EBPβ. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5057. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hirz T, et al. Neutrophils protect lymphoma cells against cytotoxic and targeted therapies through CD11b/ICAM-1 binding. Oncotarget. 2017;8:72818–72834. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pylaeva E, Lang S, Jablonska J. The essential role of type I interferons in differentiation and activation of tumor-associated neutrophils. Front. Immunol. 2016;7:629. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sun C, Dotti G, Savoldo B, et al. Utilizing cell-based therapeutics to overcome immune evasion in hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2016;127:3350–3359. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-12-629089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Witkowski MT, Lasry A, Carroll WL, Aifantis I. Immune-Based Therapies in Acute Leukemia. Trends in Cancer. 2019;5:604–618. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Newman AM, et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:453–457. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Delgado MD, León J. Myc roles in hematopoiesis and leukemia. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:605–616. doi: 10.1177/1947601910377495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huntington ND, Vosshenrich CAJ, Di Santo JP. Developmental pathways that generate natural-killer-cell diversity in mice and humans. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007;7:703–714. doi: 10.1038/nri2154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yu J, Freud AG, Caligiuri MA. Location and cellular stages of natural killer cell development. Trends Immunol. 2013;34:573–582. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2013.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mundy-Bosse BL, et al. MicroRNA-29b mediates altered innate immune development in acute leukemia. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:4404–4416. doi: 10.1172/JCI85413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Scoville SD, et al. Human AML activates the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway to impair NK cell development and function. Blood. 2018;132:1792–1804. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-838474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chiossone L, et al. Maturation of mouse NK cells is a 4-stage developmental program. Blood. 2009;113:5488–5496. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-187179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hayakawa Y, Smyth MJ. CD27 dissects mature NK cells into two subsets with distinct responsiveness and migratory capacity. J. Immunol. 2006;176:1517–1524. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kamimura Y, Lanier LL. Homeostatic control of memory cell progenitors in the natural killer cell lineage. Cell Rep. 2015;10:280–291. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang F, et al. Disruption of Erk-dependent type I interferon induction breaks the myxoma virus species barrier. Nat. Immunol. 2004;5:1266–1274. doi: 10.1038/ni1132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Swann JB, et al. Type I IFN contributes to NK cell homeostasis, activation, and antitumor function. J. Immunol. 2007;178:7540–7549. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dunn GP, Bruce AT, Ikeda H, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat. Immunol. 2002;3:991–998. doi: 10.1038/ni1102-991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guan J, et al. Role of type I interferon receptor signaling on NK cell development and functions. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e111302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mizutani T, et al. Conditional IFNAR1 ablation reveals distinct requirements of Type I IFN signaling for NK cell maturation and tumor surveillance. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:1027–1037. doi: 10.4161/onci.21284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zitvogel L, Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Smyth MJ, Kroemer G. Type I interferons in anticancer immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015;15:405–414. doi: 10.1038/nri3845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Müller L, Aigner P, Stoiber D. Type I interferons and natural killer cell regulation in cancer. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:304. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Madera S, et al. Type I IFN promotes NK cell expansion during viral infection by protecting NK cells against fratricide. J. Exp. Med. 2016;213:225–233. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sabò A, et al. Selective transcriptional regulation by Myc in cellular growth control and lymphomagenesis. Nature. 2014;511:488–492. doi: 10.1038/nature13537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schuhmacher M, et al. The transcriptional program of a human B cell line in response to Myc. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:397–406. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.2.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Staller P, et al. Repression of p15INK4b expression by Myc through association with Miz-1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001;3:392–399. doi: 10.1038/35070076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wanzel M, et al. A ribosomal protein L23-nucleophosmin circuit coordinates Mizl function with cell growth. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10:1051–1061. doi: 10.1038/ncb1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gartel AL, et al. Myc represses the p21(WAF1/CIP1) promoter and interacts with Sp1/Sp3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:4510–4515. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081074898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schlee M, et al. C-myc activation impairs the NF-kappaB and the interferon response: implications for the pathogenesis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;120:1387–1395. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hummel M, et al. A biologic definition of Burkitt’s lymphoma from transcriptional and genomic profiling. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354:2419–2430. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zech L, Haglund U, Nilsson K, Klein G. Characteristic chromosomal abnormalities in biopsies and lymphoid-cell lines from patients with Burkitt and non-Burkitt lymphomas. Int. J. Cancer. 1976;17:47–56. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910170108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Peirs S, et al. ABT-199 mediated inhibition of BCL-2 as a novel therapeutic strategy in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2014;124:3738–3747. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-574566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Clappier E, et al. Clonal selection in xenografted human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia recapitulates gain of malignancy at relapse. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:653–661. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Van Vlierberghe P, Pieters R, Beverloo HB, Meijerink JPP. Molecular-genetic insights in paediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2008;143:153–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07314.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aifantis I, Raetz E, Buonamici S. Molecular pathogenesis of T-cell leukaemia and lymphoma. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008;8:380–390. doi: 10.1038/nri2304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tremblay CS, Hoang T, Hoang T. Early T cell differentiation lessons from T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2010;92:121–156. doi: 10.1016/S1877-1173(10)92006-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gerby B, et al. High-throughput screening in niche-based assay identifies compounds to target preleukemic stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:4569–4584. doi: 10.1172/JCI86489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Weng AP, et al. c-Myc is an important direct target of Notch1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2096–2109. doi: 10.1101/gad.1450406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Choi PS, et al. Lymphomas that recur after MYC suppression continue to exhibit oncogene addiction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:17432–17437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107303108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mattei F, Schiavoni G, Belardelli F, Tough DF. IL-15 is expressed by dendritic cells in response to type I IFN, double-stranded RNA, or lipopolysaccharide and promotes dendritic cell activation. J. Immunol. 2001;167:1179–1187. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Montoya M, et al. Type I interferons produced by dendritic cells promote their phenotypic and functional activation. Blood. 2002;99:3263–3271. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.9.3263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gajewski TF, Corrales L. New perspectives on type I IFNs in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2015;26:175–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Felsher DW, Rhim SH, Braun J. A murine model for B-cell lymphomagenesis in immunocompromised hosts: natural killer cells are an important component of host resistance to premalignant B-cell lines. Cancer Res. 1990;50:7050–7056. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Belting L, et al. Critical role of the NKG2D receptor for NK cell-mediated control and immune escape of B-cell lymphoma. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015;45:2593–2601. doi: 10.1002/eji.201445375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Paczulla AM, et al. Absence of NKG2D ligands defines leukaemia stem cells and mediates their immune evasion. Nature. 2019;572:254–259. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1410-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zou W. Mechanistic insights into cancer immunity and immunotherapy. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2018;15:419–420. doi: 10.1038/s41423-018-0011-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Delmore JE, et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc. Cell. 2011;146:904–917. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tang X, et al. First-in-man clinical trial of CAR NK-92 cells: safety test of CD33-CAR NK-92 cells in patients with relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018;8:1083–1089. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chu J, et al. CS1-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered natural killer cells enhance in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity against human multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2014;28:917–927. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Cheng M, Chen Y, Xiao W, Sun R, Tian Z. NK cell-based immunotherapy for malignant diseases. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2013;10:230–252. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2013.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
We employed previously published data sets available in GEO to conduct CIBERSORT of human B- and T-ALL patients as described in Fig. 6. The following data sets were used: GSE4475 (Fig. 6a–e), GSE62156 (Fig. 6f–h) and GSE11057/GSE11058 (Fig. 6f–h). RNA-sequencing data of bulk splenic samples from normal, SRα-tTA MYCON and SRα-tTA MYCOFF mice generated by us (Fig. 4a–d) can be accessed in GEO (GSE106078). All other relevant data are available in the Article, Supplementary Information or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.