Highlights
-
•
Quantitative polymerase chain reactions specifically detect Trichoderma atroviride.
-
•
The method uses a probe based on the tef-1α for the detection.
-
•
The method simultaneously detects T. atroviride and Botrytis cinerea in blackberries.
Keywords: Biological control, Molecular quantification, Hydrolysis probe, qPCR, Rubus adenotrichos
Abstract
The aim of this study was to design a Trichoderma atroviride-specific qPCR oligo set, evaluate its specificity, and standardize a methodology that quantifies antagonism against Botrytis cinerea in blackberry fruits (Rubus adenotrichos Schltdl.). Primers and probe were designed based on the nuclear translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α) of T. atroviride. A commercial IGS-based oligo set was used to quantify B. cinerea. The specificity of the designed oligo set, along with ITS-based oligo sets, was assessed using other Trichoderma species and B. cinerea. Multiplex qPCR assays were performed using DNA from B. cinerea, T. atroviride, and blackberries inoculated with these fungi. Assays with the tef1-α oligo set showed high sensitivity and reproducibility. In inoculated fruits, T. atroviride and B. cinerea were quantified simultaneously, including in symptomless tissues. This work standardized a qPCR methodology that specifically targets a T. atroviride isolate. This newly-designed qPCR oligo set could be useful in future biological control programs.
1. Introduction
Biological control using natural antagonistic microorganisms has been extensively studied with the idea to exploit their potential for biological suppression of plant diseases. Hypocrea/Trichoderma (Ascomycota, Hypocreales) is a well-studied fungal genus used for biocontrol against numerous plant pathogens [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]]. Different species of Trichoderma have been used for the biological control of Botrytis cinerea [[10], [11], [12], [13]], an economically-important pathogenic fungus that affects over 200 plant species without any apparent host specificity [[14], [15], [16], [17]]. In blackberries and raspberries (Rubus spp.), B. cinerea causes gray mold, one of the most common and serious diseases [17,18] that infects any aerial part of the plant at any stage of development, but particularly infects mature fruit [14,15,19,20].
Many species of the genus Trichoderma from around the world have been described through molecular analyses [21]. The diverse survival mechanisms of Trichoderma, such as their enzymatic capacity to degrade substrates, versatile metabolism, and resistance to microbial inhibitors, are closely related to their wide distribution and ecological plasticity [5]. The diverse habits of Trichoderma spp. include mycoparasitism, antibiosis with secondary metabolites, competition with other fungi for nutrients, saprophytism, endophytism, and induced systemic acquired resistance in host plants [5,[21], [22], [23]]. In Costa Rica, Trichoderma isolates from cultivated tropical highland blackberries (R. adenotrichos (Schltdl.)) have shown antagonistic activity against B. cinerea in laboratory and field evaluations [[24], [25], [26]]. Blackberry growers have shown increasing interest in applying biological control agents like Trichoderma in organic production.
Different molecular techniques have been implemented to quantify both phytopathogenic and antagonistic fungi. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is one of these techniques. B. cinerea detection and quantification assays using qPCR have been carried out in different plant species [[27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]]. For the detection and quantification of Trichoderma, primers and probes have been designed for different species with the aim to monitor soil-inhabiting strains and biocontrol strains [7,[36], [37], [38], [39]].
Most of the primers and probes designed for the detection and quantification of Trichoderma are based on the nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA). The rDNA is the most commonly used target region for the identification of many organisms at the species-level because of its highly variable regions, as well as its highly conserved sequences. This region contains the 18S, 5.8S and 28S ribosomal genes separated by the internal transcribed spacers, ITS1 and ITS2, and the intergenic spacer region (IGS). The ITS regions have been extensively sequenced and numerous rDNA reference sequences are currently available in databases, enabling the design of universal primer sets. Numerous sets of oligos have been designed for Trichoderma species that amplify the ITS1 and ITS2 regions [7,22,36,[39], [40], [41], [42]], and although the ITS region is considered the barcoding region for fungal identification [22,[43], [44], [45]], differentiation of related species in certain taxonomic groups, such as Hypocreales, is limited due to sequence homology ([23,[46], [47], [48], [49]]; ISTH-International Subcommission on Trichoderma and Hypocrea Taxonomy). The translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α) is a more informative phylogenetic marker, since the gene contains greater sequence variability than the rDNA as well as more informative phylogenetic characters than other regions [3,46,47]. This variability increases the capacity to differentiate between and within closely related groups of Trichoderma species [46].
Developing a qPCR probe based on the Trichoderma tef1-α gene would be a useful tool to monitor and estimate the efficiency of control of different Trichoderma strains against B. cinerea on visibly infected or symptomless tissue. The objective of this study was to develop a TaqMan oligo set based on a target Trichoderma tef1-α and standardize a multiplex qPCR methodology for the in planta fungal quantification of Trichoderma and B. cinerea on blackberry fruits (R. adenotrichos).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Fungal isolation, purification and inoculation
Blackberry fruits (R. adenotrichos, landrace Vino espina roja) with visible signs of infection by B. cinerea were collected from the district of San Isidro of El Guarco, in the province of Cartago, Costa Rica (N 09°44'39.9” W083°56'15.7”). B. cinerea mycelia and conidia from infected fruits were isolated and cultured in Petri dishes on potato-dextrose agar (PDA, Oxoid Ltd., ThermoScientific™) with 25 % lactic acid (PDA + 25LA). Plates were incubated at room temperature (25 °C) in the dark for at least 3 d, purified and recultured in PDA + 25LA. Plates were incubated at 25 °C with an alternating photoperiod of 12 h until B. cinerea formed a lawn.
Five fruit-derived Trichoderma isolates ([[24], [25], [26]]; Table 1) were reactivated and cultured by following the methodology described above for B. cinerea. Pure cultures of B. cinerea and Trichoderma were obtained by single spore isolation (monosporic cultures) using the methods described by Choi et al. [50]. Plates were left overnight and spore germination was observed within 24 h. Germinating spores were individually selected and transferred onto Petri dishes with PDA + 25LA medium and grown at 25 °C with a photoperiod of 12 h.
Table 1.
Trichoderma isolates associated with Rubus adenotrichos fruit from different growing regions in Costa Rica used in this study.
| Species | Isolate | Location | Georeference | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. asperellum | SM13BCR | San Martín, León Cortés | N 09°43'43.2” W084°00'06.3” | [25] |
| T. atroviride | BV1CR | Buena Vista, Pérez Zeledón | N 09°30'15.3” W083°39'28.4” | [25] |
| T. harzianum | BC1CR | Bajo Canet, Tarrazú | N 09°42'01.3” W083°59'49.0” | [26] |
| T. lentiforme | J2-1CR | Jardín, Pérez Zeledón | N 09°30'08.3” W083°41'29.4” | [26] |
| T. rifaii | J2-2CR | Jardín, Pérez Zeledón | N 09°30'08.3” W083°41'29.4” | [26] |
| B. cinerea | BcLLCR | La Luchita, El Guarco | N 09°44'39.9” W083°56'15.7” | Present study |
Healthy half-ripen (darkish red) blackberries were superficially disinfected in 75 % ethanol for 30 s, 0.5 % NaClO for 1 min and rinsed three times for 1 min in sterile distilled water. Each fruit was placed on a sterile Petri dish with water agar and superficially inoculated with 20 μl of a conidial suspension at a concentration of 1 × 106 conidia/mL. Twenty fruits were inoculated with each fungus (BcLLCR, BV1CR + BcLLCR and BV1CR) for a total of 60 inoculated fruits, and incubated at 25 °C with a photoperiod of 12 h.
2.2. DNA extraction
Total genomic DNA was isolated from monosporic cultures of each fungus (Table 1) following the extraction protocol detailed by Hoyos et al. [51] with some modifications to work with small volumes. Two hundred mg of mycelia and conidia of each fungus were scraped from Petri dishes, transferred to 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes and ground using plastic pestles. Five hundred μl of preheated (60 °C) extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7,2; 50 mM EDTA; 3 % SDS; 1 M NaCl; 1 % Mercaptoethanol) was added to ground fungal tissue and mixed by inversion. Tubes containing ground fungal tissue were incubated in a 60 °C water bath for 30 min and mixed by inversion every 10 min. One volume (500 μl) of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was added to each tube and shaken to form an emulsion. Tubes were centrifuged at 10,000 xg for 15 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 mL sterile tube. This process was repeated. Cold isopropanol (0.54 volumes) was added to each sample and each tube was centrifuged at 10,000 xg for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was washed with 70 % ethanol and dried using a Vacufuge® Plus (Eppendorf). The pellet was resuspended in 200 μl TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA). RNase A was added to a final concentration of 10 μg/mL and the samples were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. DNA contamination assessment (RNA-free) was verified through electrophoresis in 0.8 % (w/v) TopVision™ (ThermoScientific™) agarose gels stained with 1X GelRed™ (Biotium Inc.) and viewed under UV light (BioDoc-It Imaging™ System).
DNA was extracted from 60 blackberry fruits (1−2 g) inoculated with Trichoderma BV1CR and/or B. cinerea BcLLCR. Each blackberry fruit was ground using a porcelain mortar and pestle, and DNA extractions were performed following the procedure described by Hoyos et al. [51] without modifications. Additionally, leaf DNA was extracted from in vitro-grown blackberry seedlings with the DNeasy Plant Mini kit® (QIAGEN®) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNase treatments were applied as previously described. DNA integrity was verified through electrophoresis on 0.8 % (w/v) TopVision™ (ThermoScientific™) agarose gels stained with 1X GelRed ™ (Biotium Inc.) and viewed under UV light. DNA concentration was determined using standard Lambda DNA (ThermoScientific™) and purity was determined through UV light spectrophotometry with a NanoDrop™2000 (ThermoScientific™) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA impurities were removed using DNeasy Mini spin columns from the DNeasy Plant Mini kit®.
2.3. PCR and DNA sequencing
The ITS region between the internal transcribed spacers, ITS1 and ITS2, of the nuclear ribosomal genes was amplified using the universal primers ITS1 (5’-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3’), ITS2 (5’-GCTGCGTTCTTCTTCATCGATGC-3’), ITS5 (5'-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3') and ITS4 (5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’) [3,40,43,52,53,22,41,42,47]. The third intron and fourth exon of the tef1-α gene was partially amplified with primers EF1-728 M (5’-CATYGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG-3’), EF-2R (5’-GGARGTACCAGTSATCATGTT-3’), Ef700f (5’- TCTACCAGTGCGGTGGTA-3’) and tef1R (5’-GCCATCCTTCGAACCAGC-3’) [3,21,47,54]. These primers were used to amplify DNA from all Trichoderma isolates (Table 1), B. cinerea and in vitro-grown blackberry plants. Twenty five μl PCR reactions were carried out with the following reaction mixture: 1.25 U of DreamTaq™polymerase, 1X DreamTaq™Buffer (ThermoScientific™), 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1 μM of each primer, 50−100 ng of DNA and QIAGEN® nuclease-free water. Reactions were performed in a Veriti™(Applied Biosystems®) thermocycler under the following temperature profile: an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 amplification cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 56 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; and a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were analyzed on 1% (w/v) TopVision™ agarose gels stained with 1X GelRed™. Amplicon sizes were determined against a GeneRuler™ (ThermoScientific™) 100 bp DNA ladder. PCR products were sent to Macrogen Inc. (South Korea) for purification and bidirectional Sanger sequencing. Sequences were edited and assembled using BioEdit v.7.2.5 [55]. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST®; available at: http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was used to compare sequences with reference sequences deposited in GenBank® of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) for species identification.
2.4. Phylogenetic analysis
The analysis was performed using the tef1-α gene sequences. To calculate genetic relationships and identify species, multiple alignment and cluster analyses of DNA sequences of the Trichoderma isolates were carried out. Consensus sequences obtained from the tef1-α were aligned using Clustal W v.2.0 [56], MUSCLE [57] and MAFFT v.7.017 [58], and afterwards were manually refined. The search for the best-fit nucleotide substitution model was performed in jModelTest v.2.1.4 [59] based on Maximum Likelihood (ML; [60]), Bayesian Inference (BI; [61]), Decision Theory calculations (DT; [62]), and the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC; [63]). PhyML v.3.0 [64], RAxML v.7.2.8 ([65]; GTR Gamma model) and Mr. Bayes v.3.2.6 ([66]; "chain length" = 1,100,000, "heat chains" = 4, "burn-in length" = 100,000, "sub-sampling frequency" = 200, "random seed" = 26,500) with 1000 replacements (bootstrap values) were used to generate trees. The K2P substitution model [67] was also used to generate a tree by Neighbor Joining (NJ; 1000 replacements) with Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP) v.4.0a (build 165; [68]). In total, 14 GenBank® sequences from Trichoderma type material were included in the phylogenetic analysis and compared with the Trichoderma isolates in this study (Table 2).
Table 2.
GenBank® accession numbers of the isolates used in this study for the phylogenetic analysis and identification.
| Accession | Species | Origin | Host/Substrate | Voucher No./Culture | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AF348093.1 | T. afarasin | Cameroon | Soil | CBS 130755=IMI 393967=G.J.S. 99-227 | [47] |
| FJ463301.1 | T. afroharzianum | Peru | Theobroma cacao | CBS 124620 = G.J.S. 04-186 | [47] |
| GU198294.1 | T. asperelloides | Vietnam | Soil | G.J.S. 04-111 | [69] |
| AY376058.1 | T. asperellum | United States | Soil | CBS 433.97 | [70] |
| MK644116 | T. asperellum | Costa Rica | Rubus adenotrichos | SM13BCR | Present study |
| AF456889.1 | T. atroviride | Canada | Fungi compost | DAOM 222144 | [21] |
| MK644115 | T. atroviride | Costa Rica | Rubus adenotrichos | BV1CR | Present study |
| AF348107.1 | T. camerunense | Cameroon | Soil | CBS 137272=G.J.S. 99-230 | [47] |
| AF348101.1 | T. harzianum | United Kingdom | Soil | CBS 226.95 | [47] |
| MK644117 | T. harzianum | Costa Rica | Rubus adenotrichos | BC1CR | Present study |
| AF348099.1 | T. inhamatum | Colombia | Soil | CBS 273.78 = IMI 287526=G.J.S. 95-39 | [47] |
| FJ463333.1 | T. lentiforme | Brazil | Theobroma cacao | Dis 167e | [47] |
| MK644114 | T. lentiforme | Costa Rica | Rubus adenotrichos | J2-1CR | Present study |
| EU338335.1 | T. longibrachiatum | Canada | Soil | DAOM 166989 | [21] |
| EU248618.1 | T. martiale | Brazil | Theobroma cacao | CBS 123052 | [21] |
| FJ463324.1 | T. rifaii | Ecuador | Theobroma gileri | CBS 130746= Dis 355b | [47] |
| MK644113 | T. rifaii | Costa Rica | Rubus adenotrichos | J2-2CR | Present study |
| DQ841726.1 | T. scalesiae | Ecuador | Scalesia pedunculata | CBS 120069 T = G.J.S. 03-74 | [71] |
| AY376053 | T. viride | Netherlands | Cellulosic tissue | CBS 101526 | [21] |
CBS = CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre culture collection, The Netherlands; DAOM = Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada National Mycological Culture Collection; G.J.S. = G.J. Samuels; Dis = H.C. Evans endophyte cultures, IMI = CABI-Bioscience, Egham, U.K.
2.5. Primer and probe design
Two primers and a hydrolysis probe (TaqMan®) were designed based on the tef1-α sequence of the BV1CR isolate using BioEdit v7.2.5 [55] and Primer Express® v3.0 from Applied Biosystems®, following the manufacturer’s recommendations [72]. The oligo set (primer and probe) encompassed a sequence between the third intron and fourth exon of the tef1-α (92 nucleotides amplicon; Fig. 1) of T. atroviride BV1CR (Accession MK644115) (Positions 866–946 of the tef1-α gene of T. asperellum NW_020208831.1 genomic DNA used as reference). The probe was fluorescently labeled at the 5´-end with VIC™ and a minor groove binder (MGB) conjugated with a non-fluorescent quencher (NFQ) was attached at the 3´-end. Primers and probe were synthesized and purified by standard desalting and HPLC by Invitrogen™. Both primers and labeled probe had a predicted annealing temperature of 58 °C and 68 °C, respectively.
Fig. 1.
Multiple alignment of partial sequences of the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α), generated by BioEdit, showing the position of the TrichoBV1 F/R primers (arrows) and the TrichoBV1 probe (line) designed to detect Trichoderma atroviride isolate BV1CR through qPCR.
Primer and probe specificity were evaluated by comparing all the aligned tef1-α sequences from the Trichoderma isolates (Table 1), B. cinerea and R. adenotrichos and by in silico PCR tests using an online in silico PCR amplification tool (http://insilico.ehu.eus). Publicly available tef1-α sequences of Trichoderma accessions from the GenBank were also evaluated for specificity.
2.6. qPCR optimization and data analyses
qPCR assay efficacy was evaluated using the de novo designed oligo set and DNA from five Trichoderma isolates (Table 1), B. cinerea and R. adenotrichos leaves. Two oligo sets, based on the ITS regions, designed to detect T. harzianum [7], T. atroviride, T. koningii, and T. viride (United States Environmental Protection Agency, n.d.; Table 3) were included in qPCR experiments. A PrimerDesign™ Ltd. Genesig detection and quantification kit was used to quantify B. cinerea through qPCR assays. This specific oligo set amplified the IGS region of the nuclear rDNA ([30]; Table 3).
Table 3.
Primers and probes used in this study for the qPCR assays.
| Primers and Probes | Oligo set | Sequence (5'-3') | Target gene | Target species | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bc3 F | GCTGTAATTTCAATGTGCAGAATCC | ||||
| Bc3 R | Bc3 | GGAGCAACAATTAATCGCATTTC | IGS | B. cinerea | [30] |
| Bc3 Probea | TCACCTTGCAATGAGTGG | ||||
| ITS1 S Tharz | TACAACTCCCAAACCCAATGTGA | ||||
| ITS1 R Tharz | Tharz | CCGTTGTTGAAAGTTTTGATTCATTT | ITS | T. harzianum | [7] |
| ITS1 TM Tharz Probea | AACTCTTATTGTATACCCCCTCGCGGGT | ||||
| TviriF1 | CCCAAACCCAATGTGAACCA | T. atroviride | |||
| TviriR1 | Tviri | TCCGCGAGGGGACTACAG | ITS | T. koningii | EPA USA |
| TviriP1 Probea | CCAAACTGTTGCCTCGGCGGG | T. viride | |||
| TrichoBV1 F | TCAATCCCTGTGTGGTTCAG | ||||
| TrichoBV1 R | Tatrov | GAACCCACGCATACTTGAAA | tef1-α | T. atroviride | Present study |
| TrichoBV1 Probeb | CGGCTTCCTATTGATTGAAACA |
FAM (6-carboxy-fluorescein)-labelled probe at.3’.
VIC (trade name)-labelled probe at.5’.
TrichoBV1 F and TrichoBV1 R primer concentrations were evaluated using an optimization matrix with concentrations at 50, 300 and 900 nM. Four reactions were tested for each primer combination with a probe concentration fixed at 250 nM. The concentrations of the Bc3P and TrichoBV1P probes were evaluated in duplicate at 100, 150 and 250 nM, with a primer concentration fixed at 300 nM, following the recommendations of Applied Biosystems® [72]. Standard B. cinerea DNA from the Genesig kit and DNA from the BcLLCR and BV1CR isolates (Table 1) were used as positive controls for qPCR. A primer and probe set based on the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COX) [73] was used as a positive internal control to assess DNA quality. In vitro-grown, blackberry leaf-derived DNA, and QIAGEN® nuclease-free water were used as negative controls.
A standard curve was constructed based on threshold cycles (Cq) for 10-fold serial dilutions using T. atroviride BV1CR and B. cinerea BcLLCR DNA, following the recommendations of Applied Biosystems® [74,72] and PrimerDesign™ (n.d.). To do so, triplicate serial DNA dilutions (1:10) from each fungus were prepared. Dilutions ranged from 3 × 105 to 3 copies for the T. atroviride haploid genome and from 5 × 105 to 5 copies for the B. cinerea haploid genome. Copy number was calculated according to Applied Biosystems® [74] specifications. Using StepOne™ software v2.3 (Applied Biosystems®), a standard curve was generated with the logarithmically-transformed DNA quantities of each dilution series plotted against the Cq values observed, and a linear regression equation was calculated. The efficiency (E) of the PCR was calculated using the equation E = [10(−1/slope) -1] x100. Limits of detection (LoD) were calculated using 18 replicates at a 95 % success rate and a 40 cycle cut-off point [75,76].
To evaluate experimental oligo set performance, multiplex manual reactions were prepared and run in duplicate using DNA from fungus-inoculated blackberries at 3 and 10 d after inoculation (DAI) in a StepOne™ real-time PCR thermocycler (Applied Biosystems®), for a total of 60 tested fruits (10 per fungal inoculation per day tested). Each qPCR reaction mixture was 10 μl and included the following: 1X TaqMan® Universal Master Mix II with UNG, (Applied Biosystems®), 300 nM of each primer, 250 nM labeled probes, and 2.5 μl of 1:20, 1:100 or 1:1000 DNA dilutions. Reactions were carried out in MicroAmp™ Fast Optical 48-Well Reaction Plates (0.1 mL) (Applied Biosystems®) covered with MicroAmp™ 48-Well Optical Adhesive Films (Applied Biosystems®). The following temperature profile was used: 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min; 50 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 55 °C for 1 min with data capture. All Cq values were determined using the StepOne™ software v2.3 software (Applied Biosystems®). Copy number of the target sequences were calculated based on Cq values of the standard curves.
3. Results
3.1. PCR and DNA sequencing
PCR products of approximately 300 bp were generated using the ITS1 / ITS2 primers and of 600–700 bp using primers ITS1 / ITS4, ITS5 / ITS4, EF1−728 M / EF-2R and Ef700f / tef1R for all fungal DNA samples. When BLAST® searches were limited to sequences of type materials (specimens of species registered in taxonomic databases for comparative purposes) deposited in GenBank®, the species identification was different from that obtained in standard searches from non-type material. When compared with GenBank® tef1-α gene sequences of type materials, the BLAST® analysis showed that BC1CR, J2-1CR and J2-2CR were all similar to the species T. harzianum, T. rifaii, T. afarasin, T. camerunense, T. inhamatum, T. aggressivum, and T. afroharzianum, while BV1CR was similar to T. atroviride, T. paratroviride, T. viride, T. scalesiae and T. martiale. The SM13B isolate showed similarity only with T. asperellum. BLAST® analysis with ITS sequences showed lower species-level resolution (data not shown) and therefore were not included for phylogenetic analysis.
3.2. Phylogenetic analysis
The phylogenetic analysis determined species identity and genetic relationships (Table 2 and Fig. 2). The tef1-α sequences from the isolates of the study herein were registered in GenBank® (Table 2). The analysis with jModelTest using the tef1-α gene sequences determined that the best nucleotide substitution model for generating the phylogenetic tree was HKY + I + G with the AIC criterion, HKY + I with the BI, DT criteria, and JC with the ML criterion (Supplementary Table 1). Therefore, the model HKY + I (-lnL = 3564.3774) was selected for inferring dendrograms with all programs. The tree generated by Mr. Bayes with MAFFT showed the highest bootstrap values (Fig. 2). The BV1CR (MK644115) isolate grouped with T. atroviride (AF456889), SM13BCR (MK644116) with T. asperellum (AY376058), J2-1CR (MK644114) with T. lentiforme (FJ463333), J2-2CR (MK644113) with T. rifaii (FJ463324) and BC1CR (MK644117) clustered with T. harzianum (AF348101) (Fig. 2). The tree generated by NJ with PAUP had a similar topology to that generated by Mr. Bayes (data not shown).
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic tree generated by Mr. Bayes with Bayesian inference based on MAFFT alignment of partial sequences (714 nucleotides) of the tef1-α gene with 1000 replacements, showing the position of different Trichoderma species. Sequences from this study and the GenBank® repository are indicated with the corresponding accession number (countries abbreviated as Bra: Brazil, Can: Canada, Came: Cameroon, Col: Colombia, Ecua: Ecuador, Neth: Netherlands, Per: Peru, UK: United Kingdom, USA: United States, Viet: Vietnam; T. longibrachiatum used as an external group). J2-1CR, BC1CR, J2-2CR, SM13BCR and BV1CR correspond to the isolates identified in this study (CR: Costa Rica).
3.3. Primer and probe design, qPCR optimization and data analyses
The designed oligo set in the present study (TrichoBV1 F/TrichoBV1 R/TrichoBV1 P) detected and quantified the BV1CR isolate using total genomic DNA from monosporic cultures and in composite plant tissue samples infected with B. cinerea. The DNA was quantifiable and the results were reproducible after all standardizations. Positive detection curves were obtained at all primer and probe concentrations and yielded similar Cq values (Fig. 3, Fig. 4). The 300 nM concentration was chosen for both primers (forward and reverse) and 250 nM for each probe, which produced intermediate Cq and standard deviation values (Fig. 3, Fig. 4).
Fig. 3.
Evaluation of nine primer concentration combinations of the primers TrichoBV1 F and TrichoBV1 R with 250 nM of TrichoBV1 probe, showing the average Cq of four reactions of each primer combination (50/50, 50/300, 50/900, 300/50, 300/300, 300/900, 900/50, 900/300, 900/900 nM) and its standard deviation (SD). F: forward, R: reverse.
Fig. 4.
Evaluation of three concentrations of Bc3 and TrichoBV1 probes with 300 nM of its corresponding primers, showing the average Cq of each probe concentration and its standard deviation (SD). Bc3P probe for B. cinerea and Tricho BV1 probe designed for Trichoderma BV1CR isolate.
The tef1-α-based oligo set showed no detection curves with DNA from R. adenotrichos leaves, BcLLCR (B. cinerea), BC1CR (T. harzianum) or SM13BCR (T. asperellum). Although there was no product amplification in in silico PCR tests, isolates J2-1CR (T. lentiforme; Cq = 40.14) and J2-2CR (T. rifaii; Cq = 44.70) showed late detection curves (>40 cycles; Table 4). The primer and probe set designed by Suárez et al. [30] specifically detected genomic DNA from the BcLLCR isolate without compromising results in the presence of the TrichoBV1 probe in multiplex reactions. The primer and probe set designed by López-Mondéjar et al. [7]; (ITS1 S Tharz/ITS1 R Tharz/ITS1 TM TharzP), based on a T. harzianum ITS region, generated early detection curves when DNA from BC1CR (T. harzianum; Cq = 25.76), J2-1CR (T. lentiforme; Cq = 27.08), and J2-2CR (T. rifaii; Cq = 25.57) were used, and late detection curves when BcLLCR DNA (B. cinerea; Cq = 36.82) was used (Table 4). The ITS-based Tviri oligo set showed late detection curves (Cq > 38.40) with DNA from BV1CR (T. atroviride) and B. cinerea (Table 4). Multiple ITS sequence alignment showed that both ITS-based primer-probe sets had identical complementary sequences with those species (data not shown). Tatrov primer sequences showed high specificity with tef1-α gene sequences from other T. atroviride accessions from GenBank® (Supplementary data).
Table 4.
Isolates and primer-probe sets evaluated by qPCR in the present study.
| Mean Cq |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accession | Species | Bc3 | Tharz | Tviri | Tatrov |
| SM13BCR | T. asperellum | – | – | – | – |
| BV1CR | T. atroviride | – | – | 38.40 | 29.70 |
| BC1CR | T. harzianum | – | 25.76 | – | – |
| J2-1CR | T. lentiforme | – | 27.08 | – | 40.14 |
| J2-2CR | T. rifaii | – | 25.57 | – | 44.70 |
| BcLLCR | B. cinerea | 24.30 | 36.82 | 43.87 | – |
There was partial or total inhibition in the BV1CR standard curve (Fig. 5), where the highest concentration tested (3 × 105 copies of the DNA of interest) showed the highest Cq values instead of showing the lowest values (Supplementary Table 2). This type of inhibition was also observed when DNA from inoculated fruit samples with visible presence (total fruit colonization) of Trichoderma BV1CR was tested. When 1:20 and 1:100 DNA dilutions were used in the qPCR reaction mixture, no curves were detected (no quantification data could be obtained from BV1CR DNA) or Cq values were reported after 40 cycles of qPCR (Supplementary Table 3). In the case of the Bc3 probe for B. cinerea, there was no inhibition and Cq values from all dilutions of the standard curve were accepted (Fig. 6). The LoD (95 % success) for T. atroviride BV1CR was 300 copies and for B. cinerea was 50 copies of the target sequence. Both standard curves showed a high correlation between the Cq values and the absolute DNA quantities of each fungus (R2 = 0.91, T. atroviride BV1CR, R2 = 1, B. cinerea), and high reaction efficiencies; 98.80 % for T. atroviride BV1CR and 94.71 % for B. cinerea (Fig. 5, Fig. 6). The coefficient of variation (CV) was 4 % and 5 % for the Tatrov and the Bc3 oligo set, respectively.
Fig. 5.
Standard curve for absolute quantification of T. atroviride BV1CR isolate based on the amplification of DNA serial dilutions (1:10), with the Tatrov oligo set (TrichoBV1 F/TrichoBV1 P/ TrichoBV1 R). The efficiency of the reaction was 98.80 % (Y-intercept = 48.141; Slope= -3.351). The limit of detection (LoD-95 %) was 300 copies of BV1CR DNA.
Fig. 6.
Standard curve for absolute quantification of B. cinerea BcLLCR isolate based on the amplification of DNA serial dilutions (1:10), with the Bc3 oligo set (Bc3 F/Bc3 P/ Bc3 R). The efficiency of the reaction was 94.71 % (Y-intercept = 37.709; Slope= -3.456). The limit of detection (LoD-95 %) was 50 copies of BcLLCR DNA.
Multiplex qPCR assays reliably quantified both B. cinerea BcLLCR and T. atroviride BV1CR in composite samples of both dual-inoculated and single-inoculated blackberry fruits at 3 and 10 DAI (Table 5). Multiplex qPCR assays quantified Trichoderma and Botrytis DNA in the presence or absence of any visible signs of fungal growth on fruit surfaces (hyphae or spores). B. cinerea was detected in fruits even when fruits were not artificially inoculated, which implies that B. cinerea was present within blackberry drupelets or other internal structures. The Tatrov probe specifically detected T. atroviride; B. cinerea was not detected with the Tatrov oligo set. The Bc3 oligo set detected B. cinerea at higher quantities at 10 DAI, except in dual inoculations. When B. cinerea and T. atroviride were co-inoculated, there was a reduction of B. cinerea at 3 DAI. Also, T. atroviride was detected in greater quantity at 10 DAI while B. cinerea was detected in smaller quantities. High SD about the mean Cq values were observed in fruit samples (up to 7.94) (Table 5), more so than in DNA samples extracted from monosporic fungal lawns.
Table 5.
Mean DNA quantifications using the Bc3 (Bc3F/P/R) and the Tatrov (TrichoBV1F/P/R) oligo sets based on 1:1000 DNA dilutions from 60 blackberries single-inoculated or dual-inoculated with B. cinerea BcLLCR, and/or T. atroviride BV1CR, in duplicate qPCR multiplex reactions. DAI: days after inoculation; SD: standard deviation.
| Oligo set | Inoculation treatment | DAI | Mean Cq | SD | Target copy No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bc3 | T. atroviride | 3 | 35.31 | 5.21 | 6 |
| Bc3 | T. atroviride | 10 | 32.27 | 2.28 | 43 |
| Bc3 | B. cinerea | 3 | 35.57 | 4.12 | 5 |
| Bc3 | B. cinerea | 10 | 33.25 | 7.94 | 23 |
| Bc3 | T. atroviride + B. cinerea | 3 | 32.75 | 2.12 | 32 |
| Bc3 | T. atroviride + B. cinerea | 10 | 35.90 | 2.50 | 4 |
| Tatrov | T. atroviride | 3 | 46.20 | 6.10 | 3 |
| Tatrov | T. atroviride | 10 | 31.13 | 2.48 | 91,572 |
| Tatrov | B. cinerea | 3 | 46.49 | 7.86 | 3 |
| Tatrov | B. cinerea | 10 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatrov | T. atroviride + B. cinerea | 3 | 38.44 | 7.11 | 648 |
| Tatrov | T. atroviride + B. cinerea | 10 | 35.60 | 7.61 | 4437 |
4. Discussion
4.1. Species identification and sequence analysis
According to Chaverri et al. [3], the DNA sequence analysis of ITS region and three genes (α-actin, calmodulin, and tef1-α) of T. harzianum demonstrated that each gene had a different percentage of informative characters (1.5, 5.8, 14.8 and 20.9 %, respectively), where the ITS was the least informative. Nevertheless, sequencing the ITS region is still routinely used to provide preliminary identification of Trichoderma at the genus level [23,47,48]. Therefore, this region was also sequenced in the present study as a pre-screen (data not shown). The tef1-α was a much more informative genetic marker in the identification and phylogenetic analysis of Trichoderma isolates.
In this study, the objective was to design a specific probe that would detect a T. atroviride isolate. Thus, using the tef1-α as a target sequence was a more appropriate choice for designing a qPCR primer and probe set.
4.2. Assay optimization
We tested different primer and probe concentrations in multiplex reactions for the simultaneous quantification of B. cinerea BcLLCR and T. atroviride BV1CR. Detection of target sequences can be inhibited when one of the target genes is present in a greater quantity than the other [72]. In our case, the Botrytis IGS region is present in greater abundance than the tef1-α gene, however, the primer and probe concentrations had little effect on Cq detection values (Fig. 3, Fig. 4). We decided to work with the highest probe concentration tested (250 nM) and intermediate primer concentration 300 nM for both target fungi, for single and multiplex reactions.
High concentrations of Trichoderma BV1CR DNA inhibited the Tricho BV1P probe’s performance. We were able to discard the possibility of competition between the B. cinerea probe and the T. atroviride probe because the effect was observed both in multiplex and in single reactions with the TrichoBV1P probe. According to Keer [77], in some experiments, the fluorescent signal may decrease after the exponential phase. This is known as the "hook effect" because of the shape of the curve generated. This is caused by the competitive hybridization that occurs between the single strands of the PCR product and the probe, and we attribute the inhibition of Tricho BV1P probe to this phenomenon. At a low product concentration, the probe competes effectively and therefore fluoresces. However, when the amount of PCR product is high, the two single strands of the PCR product bind to each other more quickly than the probe to its target sequence or binding site, so that the amount of fluorescence emitted decreases. According to Keer [77], this decrease in fluorescence does not affect the efficiency or specificity of the amplification or detection of the target DNA and this effect can be avoided by optimizing the DNA concentration in the reaction or by reducing the number of amplification cycles. In the case of Trichoderma BV1CR, the detection of the target DNA was affected and a late detection of the fungus was observed (high Cqs) or there were no amplification curves (in fruits completely covered with the fungus) when qPCR reactions were run using highly concentrated DNA. Adjusting the sample dilutions to 1:1000 allowed the expected detection and quantification of Trichoderma BV1CR present in the samples.
4.3. Primer and probe set performance
In Botrytis, the ITS regions also had limited species resolution, and therefore other regions of the genome have been studied for species identification. The IGS region between the ribosomal genes has evolved faster than the ITS regions and has more sequence variation, thus the IGS region is a much more useful tool to differentiate between closely related species [30,78,79]. The capacity of the IGS region to discriminate among species explains the high fidelity and specificity of the qPCR probe designed by Suárez et al. [30] to quantify B. cinerea. That probe successfully quantified B. cinerea in multiplex and single probe assays using total DNA extracted from the BcLLCR isolate and from composite biological matrices in the present investigation, and has been used by other researchers to study this pathogen applying qPCR technology [33,34,79].
In the case of Trichoderma, generic probes, as well as taxon-specific probes, have been developed to monitor and quantify natural populations or strains inoculated in soils or biological matrices [7,36,37,39]. All of these studies demonstrated the effectiveness and efficiency of the qPCR technique, as well as its applicability in fungal detection and monitoring programs. However, those probes were designed based on regions with little interspecific differentiation, such as the ITS, thus high specificity was not possible. In the present study, the ITS-based probe reported by López-Mondéjar et al. [7] (Tharz; Table 3) amplified and yielded low Cq values when DNA from three different Trichoderma species were used and mid Cq values when DNA from B. cinerea was used (Table 4); T. harzianum (BC1CR), T. lentiforme (J2-1CR) and T. rifaii (J2-2CR). Likewise, the EPA oligo set (Table 3) had low affinity for one of the target species (T. atroviride) and low affinity for a non target species (B. cinerea) (Table 4). The low specificity of the aforementioned probes is explained by the similarity of the ITS region among all these species. Those oligo sets should not be used to monitor and quantify B. cinerea and T. atroviride inoculated on blackberry fruits because Cq values would be confounded by both fungal DNAs.
The Tatrov oligo set demonstrated high specificity and affinity for T. atroviride BV1CR DNA in qPCR assays and was the only set of oligos that did not generate detection curves when B. cinerea DNA was added (Table 4). The Tatrov oligo set yielded detection curves with J2-1CR and J2-2CR DNA with Cq values above 40 cycles in qPCR, although no amplification occurred in in silico PCR tests. Nonetheless, Cq values for the target species, T. atroviride, were much lower (Table 4). This means that the probe quantified DNA from all three species, but with higher affinity when using T. atroviride DNA and to a much lesser extent when T. lentiforme or T. rifaii DNA was present in qPCR assays. Multiplex and single reactions should have a cut off at 40 reaction cycles when using the Tatrov oligo set for reliable quantification.
In multiplex reaction experiments, the Tatrov probe’s performance and the data collection were not affected by the presence of other Trichoderma fungi because blackberry fruits were inoculated with the BV1CR (T. atroviride) isolate and B. cinerea. Multiplex reactions using both sets of oligos, Bc3 and Tatrov, can reliably quantify each organism separately in composite samples (Table 5). Fruit assays demonstrated that B. cinerea is present within blackberry fruits and cannot be removed by surface sterilization because Botrytis remains latent during early floral and fruit development [18,[80], [81], [82]]. Interpreting biological interactions between B. cinerea and T. atroviride on or within blackberry fruits requires a greater number of samples. However, the results demonstrate the probes’ capability to detect the target fungus within a complex matrix.
The characterization and identification of isolates from fungi and other organisms at the species level is essential for their study and use as biological control agents. This requires methods that monitor their presence or absence in the environment in which they are used. Traditionally, culture techniques have been used in the laboratory through selective media and morphological and morphometric identification. However, this method takes time, does not always distinguish between or among species with similar morphologies and does not allow quantitative or direct tissue analysis. Real-time PCR with hydrolysis probe technology (TaqMan®) is an effective method to monitor and quantify organisms of interest present in simple or complex matrices, and is a useful technique when working with biological control agents. The qPCR assays performed in this investigation were sensitive and showed fast, selective and consistent results with composite DNA samples. Our findings outline and demonstrate the development of a useful tool for studying fungi that grow on or inside plant tissues and in symptomless hosts.
The results of this study have established the guidelines of a standardized, sensitive, multiplex methodology for evaluating the action of T. atroviride BV1CR as an antagonist of B. cinerea on blackberry fruits. We have developed a specific probe that selectively detects T. atroviride and does not detect B. cinerea. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a qPCR probe based on a powerful barcode marker, the tef1-α DNA sequence, for the detection of Trichoderma [83]. We propose the use of the Tatrov oligo set for mycological studies, competition assays, biological control programs and field evaluations with T. atroviride. The oligo set can also be used to evaluate active formulations of biopesticides.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Irena Hilje-Rodríguez: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. Federico J. Albertazzi: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. German Rivera-Coto: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition. Ramón Molina-Bravo: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Project administration.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Fondo Especial para la Educación Superior (FEES) of the Consejo Nacional de Rectores (CONARE), Costa Rica [grant agreement OPES-INV-VI-113-2010]. We would like to thank professor Rafael Orozco-Rodríguez, as general project coordinator, for acquiring funds to carry out this investigation. Additional thanks go to the reviewers for their revisions and feedback.
Footnotes
Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00447.
Contributor Information
Irena Hilje-Rodríguez, Email: irena.hilje.rodriguez@una.ac.cr.
Federico J. Albertazzi, Email: federico.albertazzi@ucr.ac.cr.
German Rivera-Coto, Email: sobralias.rivera911@gmail.com.
Ramón Molina-Bravo, Email: ramon.molina.bravo@una.ac.cr.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following are Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Bell D.K., Wells H.D., Markham C.R. In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma species against six fungal pathogens. Ecol. Epidemiol. 1982;72(4):379–382. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hermosa M.R., Grondona I., Iturriaga E.A., Díaz J.M., Castro C., Monte E., García I. Molecular characterization and identification of biocontrol isolates of Trichoderma spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;66(5):1890–1898. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.5.1890-1898.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chaverri P., Castlebury L.A., Samuels G.J., Geiser D.M. Multilocus phylogenetic structure within the Trichoderma harzianum/Hypocrea lixii complex. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003;27(2):302–313. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00400-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Harman G.E., Howell C.R., Viterbo A., Chet I., Lorito M. Trichoderma species — opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004;2(1):43–56. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Infante D., Martínez B., González N., Reyes Y. Mecanismos de acción de Trichoderma frente a hongos fitopatógenos [Mechanisms of action of Trichoderma against phytopathogenic fungi] Revista de Protección Vegetal. 2009;24(1):14–21. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ha T.N. Using Trichoderma species for biological control of plant pathogens in Viet Nam. J. Int. Soc. Southeast Asian Agric. Sci. 2010;16(1):17–21. [Google Scholar]
- 7.López-Mondéjar R., Antón A., Raidl S., Ros M., Pascual J.A. Quantification of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum with real-time TaqMan PCR and its potential extrapolation to hyphal biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101(8):2888–2891. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sharma P., Kumar V., Ramesh R., Saravanan K., Deep S., Sharma M., Mahesh S., Dinesh S. Biocontrol genes from Trichoderma species: a review. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011;10(86):19898–19907. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moraga-Suazo P., Opazo A., Zaldúa S., González G., Sanfuentes E. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. and Clonostachys spp. strains to control Fusarium circinatum in Pinus radiata seedlings. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2011;71(3):412–417. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Molina-Mercader G., Zaldúa-Flores S., González-Vargas G., Sanfuentes-Von Stowasser E. Selección de hongos antagonistas para el control biológico de Botrytis cinerea en viveros forestales en Chile [Selection of antagonistic fungi for biological control of Botrytis cinerea in forest nurseries in Chile] Bosque. 2006;27(2):126–134. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Elad Y., Stewart A. Microbial control of Botrytis spp. In: Elad Y.B., Williamson B., Tudzynski P., Delen N., editors. Botrytis: Biology, Pathology and Control. Springer; Dordrecht, Netherlands: 2007. pp. 223–241. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Martínez M.A., Moreno Z.Y. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana; Bogotá, Colombia: 2008. Estandarización de una metodología para la evaluación de eficacia de productos para la protección de cultivo (PPC) preventivos para el control de Botrytis spp., en condiciones semi controladas [Standardization of a methodology to evaluate effectiveness of products for preventive protection of crops (PPC) to control Botrytis spp., under semi controlled conditions] Licentiate thesis. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Merchán-Gaitán J.B., Ferrucho R.L., Alvarez-Herrera J.G. Efecto de dos cepas de Trichoderma en el control de Botrytis cinerea y la calidad del fruto en fresa (Fragaria sp.) [Effect of two Trichoderma strains onBotrytis cinerea control and strawberry (Fragaria sp.) fruit quality] Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas. 2014;8(1):44–56. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Benito E.P., Arranz M., Eslava A.P. Factores de patogenicidad de Botrytis cinerea [Pathogenicity factors of Botrytis cinerea] Revista Iberoamericana de Micología. 2000;17:S43–S46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Van Kan J.A. Infection strategies of Botrytis cinerea. the 9th International Symposium on Postharvest Physiology of Ornamental Plants 669. 2003:77–90. August. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rigotti S., Viret O., Gindro K. Two new primers highly specific for the detection of Botrytis cinerea Pers.:Fr. Phytopathología Mediterránea. 2006;45(3):253–260. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dean R., Van Kan J.A., Pretorius Z.A., Hammond-Kosack K.E., Di Pietro A., Spanu P.D. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012;13(4):414–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Keller M., Viret O., Cole F.M. Botrytis cinerea infection in grape flowers: defense reaction, latency, and disease expression. Phytopathology. 2003;93(3):316–322. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.3.316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Betanzo C.L. Licentiate thesis. Universidad Austral de Chile Valdivia; Chile: 2005. Evaluación de diferentes fungicidas para el control de Botrytis cinerea Pers. ex Fr., agente causal del “moho gris” en un huerto de arándano alto o“highbush” (Vaccinium corymbosum) de la IX Región [Evaluation of different fungicides for the control of Botrytis cinerea Pers. Ex Fr., causal agent of "gray mold" in a "highbush" blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) orchard of the IX Region] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cabello D.A. Universidad Austral de Chile; Valdivia, Chile: 2005. Evaluación de cuatro fungicidas, en el control de Botrytis cinerea Pers. ex Fr. endógena en frutos de arándano (Vaccinium corymbosum L.), cultivar de BlueRay [Evaluation of four fungicides in the control of endogenous Botrytis cinerea Pers. ex. Fr. in blueberry fruits (Vaccinium corymbosum L.), BlueRay cultivar] Licentiate thesis. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chaverri P., Samuels G.J. Evolution of habitat preference and nutrition mode in a cosmopolitan fungal genus with evidence of interkingdom host jumps and major shifts in ecology. Evolution. 2013;67(10):2823–2837. doi: 10.1111/evo.12169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Druzhinina I.S., Kopchinskiy A.G., Kubicek C.P. The first Trichoderma species characterized by molecular data. Mycoscience. 2006;47:55–64. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gazis R., Rehner S., Chaverri P. Species delimitation in fungal endophyte diversity studies and its implications in ecological and biogeographic inferences. Mol. Ecol. 2011;20(14):3001–3013. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05110.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Castillo-Jiménez J.P. Supervised professional practice. Universidad Nacional Heredia; Costa Rica: 2011. Evaluación del efecto antagónico de Trichoderma spp. sobre Botrytis cinerea Pers. en frutos de mora (Rubus spp.) bajo condiciones controladas de laboratorio [Evaluation of the antagonistic effect of Trichoderma spp. on Botrytis cinerea Pers. in blackberry fruits (Rubus spp.) under controlled laboratory conditions] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Calvo-Araya J.A., Rivera-Coto G., Orozco-Cayasso S., Orozco-Rodríguez R. Aislamiento y evaluación in vitro de antagonistas de Botrytis cinerea en mora [Isolation and in vitro evaluation of Botrytis cinerea antagonists in blackberry] Agronomía Mesoamericana. 2012;23(2):225–231. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Marín-Chacón M.A., Rivera-Coto G., Villalobos-Moya K., Orozco-Rodríguez R., Orozco-Cayasso S. Evaluación de hongos antagonistas de Botrytis cinerea Pers., en plantaciones de mora, Costa Rica [Evaluation of antagonistic fungi of Botrytis cinerea Pers., in blackberry plantations, Costa Rica] Agronomía Costarricense. 2017;41(1):7–18. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brouwer M., Lievens B., Van-Hemelrijck W., Van-den-Ackerveken G., Cammue B.P.A., Thomma B.P.H.J. Quantification of disease progression of several microbial pathogens on Arabidopsis thaliana using real-time fluorescence PCR. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003;228:241–248. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00759-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gachon C., Saindrenan P. Real-time PCR monitoring of fungal development in Arabidopsis thaliana infected by Alternaria brassicicola and Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004;42(5):367–371. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mehli L., Kjellsen T.D., Dewey F.M., Hietala A.M. A case study from the interaction of strawberry and Botrytis cinerea highlights the benefits of comonitoring both partners at genomic and mRNA level. New Phytol. J. 2005;168:465–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Suárez M.B., Walsh K., Boonham N., O’Neill T., Pearson S., Barker I. Development of real-time PCR (Taqman®) assays for the detection and quantification of Botrytis cinerea in planta. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2005;43(9):890–899. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chilvers M.I., du Toit L.J., Akamatsu H., Peever T.L. A real time, quantitative PCR seed assay for Botrytis spp. that cause neck rot of onion. Plant Dis. 2007;91(5):599–608. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-5-0599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cadle-Davidson L. Monitoring pathogenesis of natural Botrytis cinerea infections in developing grape berries. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2008;59(4):387–395. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Celik M., Kalpulov T., Zutahy Y., Ish-shalom S., Lurie S., Lichter A. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of Botrytis inoculated on table grapes by qPCR and antibodies. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009;52:235–239. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Diguta C.F., Rousseaux S., Weidmann S., Bretin N., Vincent B., Guilloux-Benatier M., Alexandre H. Development of a qPCR assay for specific quantification of Botrytis cinerea on grapes. 1, editor. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010;313:81–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02127.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Saito S., Dunne K.J., Evans K.J., Barry K., Cadle-Davidson L., Wilcox W.F. Optimization of techniques for quantification of Botrytis cinerea in grape berries and receptacles by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2013;19(1):68–73. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rubio M.B., Hermosa M.R., Keck E., Monte E. Specific PCR assays for the detection and quantification of DNA from the biocontrol strain Trichoderma harzianum 2413 in soil. Microb. Ecol. 2005;49(1):25–33. doi: 10.1007/s00248-003-0171-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hagn A., Wallisch S., Radl V., Munch J.C., Schloter M. A new cultivation independent approach to detect and monitor common Trichoderma species in soil. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2007;69(1):86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kim T.G., Knudsen G.R. Quantitative real-time PCR effectively detects and quantifies colonization of sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by Trichoderma spp. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2008;40(1):100–108. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Savazzini F., Oliveira-Longa C.M., Pertot I., Gessler C. Real-time PCR for detection and quantification of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride strain SC1 in soil. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2008;73(2):185–194. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S.J.W.T., Taylor J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. 1990;18(1):315–322. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Maymon M., Minz D., Barbul O., Zveibil A., Elad Y., Freeman S. Identification of Trichoderma biocontrol isolates to clades according to ap-PCR and ITS sequence analysis. Phytoparasitica. 2004;32(4):370–375. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Siddiquee S., Abdullah F., Soon-Guan T., Rohaza-Aziz E. Phylogenetic relationships of Trichoderma harzianum based on the sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region-1 of the rDNA. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2007;3(9):896–903. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Larena I., Salazar O., González V., Julián M.C., Rubio V. Design of a primer for ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer with enhanced specificity for ascomycetes. J. Biotechnol. 1999;75(2):187–194. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(99)00154-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Druzhinina I.S., Kopchinskiy A.G., Komón M., Bissett J., Szakacs G., Kubicek C.P. An oligonucleotide barcode for species identification in Trichoderma and Hypocrea. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005;42:813–828. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schoch C.L., Seifert K.A., Huhndorf S., Robert V., Spouge J.L., Levesque C.A. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012;109(16):6241–6246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117018109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Samuels G.J. Trichoderma: systematics, the sexual state, and ecology. Phytopathology. 2006;96(2):195–206. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chaverri P., Branco-Rocha F., Jaklitsch W., Gazis R., Degenkolb T., Samuels G.J. Systematics of the Trichoderma harzianum species complex and the re-identification of commercial biocontrol strains. Mycologia. 2015;107(3):558–590. doi: 10.3852/14-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vidaurre-Montoya Q., Andrade-Meirelles L., Chaverri P., Rodrigues A. Unraveling Trichoderma species in attine ant environment: description of three new taxa. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2016;109(5):633–651. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0666-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Raja H.A., Miller A.N., Pearce C.J., Oberlies N.H. Fungal identification using molecular tools: a primer for the natural products research community. J. Nat. Prod. 2017;80(3):756–770. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b01085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Choi Y.W., Hyde K.D., Ho W.H. Single spore isolation of fungi. Fungal Divers. 1999;3:29–38. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hoyos L., Chaparro P., Abramsky M., Chet I., Orduz S. Evaluación de aislamientos de Trichoderma spp. contra Rhizoctonia solani y Sclerotium rolfsii bajo condiciones in vitro y de invernadero [Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. isolates versus Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii under in vitro and greenhouse conditions] Agron. Colomb. 2008;26(3):451–458. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Freeman S., Minz D., Jurkevitch E., Maymon M., Shabi E. Molecular analysis of Colletotrichum species from almond and other fruits. Phytopathology. 2000;90(6):608–614. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.6.608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Freeman S., Minz D., Kolesnik I., Barbul O., Zveibil A. Trichoderma biocontrol of Colletotrichum acutatum and Botrytis cinerea and survival in strawberry. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004;110(4):361–370. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Carbone I., Kohn L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomicetes. Mycologia. 1999;91(3):553–556. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999;41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Larkin M.A., Blackshields G., Brown N.P., Chenna R., McGettigan P.A., Mc William H. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Katoh K., Misawa K., Kuma K.I., Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(14):3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doallo R., Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods. 2012;9(8):772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hemmerle W.J., Hartley H.O. Computing maximum likelihood estimates for the mixed AOV model using the W transformation. Technometrics. 1973;15(4):819–831. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 1978;6(2):461–464. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Minin V., Abdo Z., Joyce P., Sullivan J. Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. Syst. Biol. 2003;52(5):674–683. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov B.N., Csaki F., editors. Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest. Akademiai Kiado; Hungary: 1973. pp. 267–281. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Guindon S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010;59(3):307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(21):2688–2690. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(8):754–755. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980;16(2):111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Swofford D.L. Sinauer Associates; Sunderland: 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Samuels G.J., Ismaiel A., Bon M.C., De Respinis S., Petrini O. Trichoderma asperellum sensu lato consists of two cryptic species. Mycologia. 2010;102(4):944–966. doi: 10.3852/09-243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Holmes K.A., Schroers H.J., Thomas S.E., Evans H.C., Samuels G.J. Taxonomy and biocontrol potential of a new species of Trichoderma from the Amazon basin of South America. Mycol. Prog. 2004;3(3):199–210. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Jaklitsch W.M., Samuels G.J., Dodd S.L., Lu B.S., Druzhinina I.S. Hypocrea rufa/Trichoderma viride: a reassessment, and description of five closely related species with and without warted conidia. Stud. Mycol. 2006;56:135–177. doi: 10.3114/sim.2006.56.04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Applied Biosystems . 2010. Applied Biosystems Real-Time PCR Systems, Reagent Guide; p. 147. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Li W., Hartung J.S., Levy L. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and identification of Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2006;66(1):104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Applied Biosystems . 2003. Creating Standard Curves With Genomic DNA or Plasmid DNA Templates for Use in Quantitative PCR.http://www.appliedbiosystems.com/support/tutorials/pdf/quant_pcr.pdf Available from URL: [Google Scholar]
- 75.Bustin S.A., Benes V., Garson J.A., Hellemans J., Huggett J., Kubista M. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem. 2009;55(4):611–622. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Forootan A., Sjöback R., Björkman J., Sjögreen B., Linz L., Kubista M. Methods to determine limit of detection and limit of quantification in quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) Biomol. Detect. Quantif. 2017;12:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bdq.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Keer J.T. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis. In: Keer J.T., Birch L., editors. Essentials of Nucleic Acid Analysis: A Robust Approach. The Royal Society of Chemistry; Cambridge: 2008. pp. 132–155. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Pantou M.P., Mavridou A., Typas M.A. IGS sequence variation, group-I introns and the complete nuclear ribosomal DNA of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium: excellent tools for isolate detection and phylogenetic analysis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2003;38(2):159–174. doi: 10.1016/s1087-1845(02)00536-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sanzani S.M., Schena L., De Cicco V., Ippolito A. Early detection of Botrytis cinerea latent infections as a tool to improve postharvest quality of table grapes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012;68:64–71. [Google Scholar]
- 80.McClellan W.D., Hewitt B. Early botrytis rot of grapes: time of infection and latency of Botrytis cinerea Pers. in V/f/s vinifera L. Phytopathology. 1973;63:1151–1157. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Viret O., Keller M., Jaudzems V.G., Cole F.M. Botrytis cinerea infection of grape flowers: light and electron microscopical studies of infection sites. Phytopathology. 2004;94(8):850–857. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.8.850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Williamson B., Tudzynski B., Tudzynski P., van Kan J.A.L. Botrytis cinerea: the cause of grey mould disease. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007;8(5):561–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kredics L., Chen L., Kedves O., Büchner R., Hatvani L., Allaga H. Molecular tools for monitoring Trichoderma in agricultural environments. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01599. 5421–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






