Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
. 2020 Jan 1;318(1):H207. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.zh4-2991-corr.2019

CORRIGENDUM

PMCID: PMC7276928  PMID: 31910358

Ratchford SM, Broxterman RM, La Salle DT, Kwon OS, Park SY, Hopkins PN, Richardson RS, Trinity JD. Salt restriction lowers blood pressure at rest and during exercise without altering peripheral hemodynamics in hypertensive individuals. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 317: H1194–H1202, 2019. First published December 1, 2019; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00431.2019.—In this article, the groupings in Fig. 2A were incorrectly represented and the mean arterial pressure of the liberal salt group was omitted, which is now corrected below.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Peripheral hemodynamic response to knee extension exercise in subjects with hypertension during liberal or restricted salt intake. A: systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to knee extension (KE) exercise. B: change in mean arterial pressure from baseline during KE exercise. C: femoral artery blood flow response to knee extension (KE) exercise. D: femoral artery vascular conductance response to KE exercise. Values are expressed as means ± SE for A, individual (circles) and mean (bars) data with SD are presented in B, C, and D. Data includes n = 18 (10 men/8 women). A 2 × 3 repeated-measures ANOVA (group, 2 levels: liberal vs. restricted salt group) [workload, 3 levels: KE exercise: 40, 60, 80% KE maximum (Max)] was performed to compare the hemodynamic responses. The Holm-Sidak method was used for α-adjustment and post hoc analysis. *P < 0.05, group effect. †P < 0.05, vs. 40%, both liberal and restricted salt groups. ‡P < 0.05, vs. 60%, both liberal and restricted salt.


Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES