The authors wish to make the following corrections to their paper [1]:
In Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, the values for the Repeated Measures Two-Way ANOVA and Two-Way ANOVA columns had typing errors and have now been corrected (see the corrected version of Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 bellow):
Table 1.
Results of statistical analysis in Test 1–Test 3.
| Repeated Measures Two-Way ANOVA |
Two-Way ANOVA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Alive Mice at 96 Weeks of Age | All Mice | ||
| Balancing Ability on an Acryl Rod (Test 1) | age | F (11,253) = 20.0, p < 0.001 | F (11,365) = 16.6, p < 0.001 |
| group | F (1,23) = 1.63, p > 0.05 | F (1,365) = 14.8, p < 0.001 | |
| age × group | F (11,253) =1.59, p > 0.05 | F (11,365) = 1.04, p > 0.05 | |
| Horizontal Bar Test (Test 2) | age | F (11,253) = 16.0, p < 0.001 | F (11,365) = 17.1, p < 0.001 |
| group | F (1,23) = 4.10, p = 0.054 | F (1,365) = 30.5, p < 0.001 | |
| age × group | F (11,253) = 1.00, p > 0.05 | F (11,365) = 0.99, p > 0.05 | |
| Wire Hanging Test (Test 3) | age | F (11,253) = 11.0, p < 0.001 | F (11,365) = 10.5, p < 0.001 |
| group | F (1,23) = 26.7, p < 0.001 | F (1,365) = 179.0, p < 0.001 | |
| age × group | F (11,253) = 1.00, p < 0.05 | F (11,365) = 2.16, p < 0.05 |
Table 2.
Results of statistical analysis in Test 4.
| Foot Print Test (Test 4) | Repeated Measures Two-Way ANOVA |
Two-Way ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alive Mice at 93 Weeks of Age | All Mice | ||
| Stride of forefoot | age | F (5,120) = 16.4, p < 0.001 | F (5,182) = 18.0, p < 0.001 |
| group | F (1,24) = 16.4, p < 0.05 | F (1,182) = 4.45, p < 0.05 | |
| age × group | F (5,120) = 1.73, p > 0.05 | F (5,182) = 1.85, p > 0.05 | |
| Sway of forefoot | age | F (5,120) = 10.8, p < 0.001 | F (5,182) = 12.2, p < 0.001 |
| group | F (1,24) = 4.15, p = 0.051 | F (1,182) = 3.86, p = 0.051 | |
| age × group | F (5,120) = 0.70, p > 0.05 | F (5,182) = 1.56, p > 0.05 | |
| Stance of forefoot | age | F (5,120) = 2.48, p < 0.05 | F (5,182) = 3.29, p < 0.01 |
| group | F (1,24) = 0.245, p > 0.05 | F (1,182) = 0.0007, p > 0.05 | |
| age × group | F (5,120) = 1.30, p > 0.05 | F (5,182) = 1.16, p > 0.05 | |
| Stride of hindfoot | age | F (5,120) = 8.51, p < 0.001 | F (5,182) = 9.06, p < 0.001 |
| group | F (1,24) = 14.4, p < 0.001 | F (1,182) = 8.26, p < 0.01 | |
| age × group | F (5,120) = 1.19, p > 0.05 | F (5,182) = 1.08, p > 0.05 | |
| Sway of hindfoot | age | F (5,120) = 2.70, p < 0.05 | F (5,182) = 4.65, p < 0.001 |
| group | F (1,24) = 13.4, p < 0.01 | F (1,182) = 10.9, p < 0.01 | |
| age × group | F (5,120) = 2.01, p > 0.05 | F (5,182) = 1.31, p > 0.05 | |
| Stance of hindfoot | age | F (5,120) = 4.56, p < 0.01 | F (5,182) = 3.39, p < 0.01 |
| group | F (1,24) = 0.85, p > 0.05 | F (1,182) = 1.59, p > 0.05 | |
| age × group | F (5,120) = 1.37, p > 0.05 | F (5,182) = 1.50, p > 0.05 | |
Table 3.
Results of statistical analysis in Test 5.
| Locomotor Activity (Test 5) | Repeated Measures Two-Way ANOVA |
Two-Way ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alive Mice at 96 Weeks of Age | All Mice | ||
| Locomotor activity | age | F (8,168) = 8.75, p < 0.001 | F (8,268) = 6.76, p < 0.001 |
| group | F (1,21) = 0.032, p > 0.05 | F (1,268) = 0.083, p > 0.05 | |
| age × group | F (8,168) = 0.95, p > 0.05 | F (8,268) = 0.554, p > 0.05 | |
| Center time | age | F (8,168) = 29.0, p < 0.001 | F (8,268) = 26.0, p < 0.001 |
| group | F (1,21) = 1.20, p > 0.05 | F (1,268) = 0.544, p > 0.05 | |
| age × group | F (8,168) = 4.20, p < 0.01 | F (8,268) = 2.83, p < 0.001 | |
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Shimizu C., Wakita Y., Tsuchiya Y., Nabeshima T. Influence of Housing Systems on Physical, Emotional, and Cognitive Functions with Aging in DBA/2CrSlc Mice. Animals. 2020;10:746. doi: 10.3390/ani10040746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]