Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Jun 8;1(2):e63. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30037-9

Stability and neutralising capacity of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in convalescent plasma

Torsten Tonn a,b, Victor M Corman c,d, Matthias Johnsen b, Anja Richter c,d, Roman N Rodionov e, Christian Drosten c,d, Stefan R Bornstein e,f
PMCID: PMC7279746  PMID: 32835332

Convalescent plasma is a promising therapeutic strategy that might have benefit in patients with COVID-19,1, 2 despite unproven safety and efficacy. Although randomised clinical trials are ongoing, decision making with regard to the transfusion of convalescent plasma from patients who have recovered from COVID-19 should follow a risk-based approach, whereby the potential risks are minimised in favour of not yet proven therapeutic benefits. WHO Blood Regulators Network and several other stakeholders, such as the International Society of Blood Transfusion, recommend risk mitigation for transfusion-transmissible disease through pathogen inactivation.3, 4 However, at present no data exist regarding the effect of pathogen-inactivation methods or cryopreservation on the stability of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralising antibodies.

We therefore analysed the effect of psoralen and ultraviolet light pathogen inactivation (Intercept Blood System; Cerus, Concord, CA USA) on the total SARS-CoV-2 IgG titre (IgG ELISA; Euroimmun, Lubeck, Germany) and neutralising capacity (life virus assay)5 in convalescent plasma obtained from patients who have recovered from COVID-19. Our data show that pathogen inactivation of convalescent plasma does not impair the stability and neutralising capacity of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies compared with non-pathogen-inactivated controls. Although SARS-CoV-2 IgG titre and neutralising capacity seem to correlate, initial observations from our ongoing convalescent plasma programme at University Hospital Carl-Gustav Carus (Dresden, Germany) have shown that some individual cases have moderate neutralising capacity despite high anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG titres (appendix). The stability of SARS-CoV-2 IgG and the overall neutralising capacity was also preserved at 100% when the plasma was shock frozen at −30°C after pathogen-inactivation (appendix) or stored as liquid plasma for up to 9 days (data not shown).

Our data suggest that pathogen-inactivation of convalescent plasma from patients who have recovered from COVID-19 does not alter the potential therapeutic potency and should be recommended to mitigate the risk for transfusion associated viral transmission. Considering the currently unproven clinical benefit of convalescent plasma obtained from patients who have had COVID-19, a shift in the risk–benefit ratio towards benefit by means of pathogen-inactivation should be employed in all cases, in settings where the use of pathogen inactivation methods are available and established.

Acknowledgments

We declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary appendix
mmc1.pdf (209KB, pdf)

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary appendix
mmc1.pdf (209KB, pdf)

Articles from The Lancet. Microbe are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES