Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biodiversity Data Journal logoLink to Biodiversity Data Journal
. 2020 Jun 1;8:e53678. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e53678

Distoseptispora bambusae sp. nov. (Distoseptisporaceae) on bamboo from China and Thailand

Yaru Sun 1,2, Ishani D Goonasekara 2, Kasun M Thambugala 3, Ruvishika S Jayawardena 2, Yong Wang 1,✉, Kevin D Hyde 2,4
PMCID: PMC7280319  PMID: 32547305

Abstract

Background

Bamboo is a widespread plant with medicinal value. During our taxonomic study on medicinal plants, three collections of Distoseptispora were made from China and Thailand. Phylogenetic analyses of combined LSU, ITS and RPB2 sequence data showed that two collections represented a new species, phylogenetically distinct from other described species in Distoseptispora.

New information

This new species has macronematous, mononematous conidiophores, polyblastic or monoblastic conidiogenous cells and acrogenous, solitary, straight, obclavate, multi-septate, thick-walled conidia. Distoseptispora bambusae sp. nov. is introduced with illustrations and a comprehensive description. The third collection on dead wood from Thailand was identified as D. tectona with newly-generated molecular data for this taxon.

Keywords: One new taxon, Distoseptisporales , hyphomycete, multi-gene phylogeny, taxonomy

Introduction

Distoseptispora was introduced by Su et al. (2016) with Distoseptispora fluminicola McKenzie, H.Y. Su, Z.L. Luo & K.D. Hyde as the type species. Distoseptispora has macronematous, septate, unbranched, straight or flexuous, smooth, olivaceous to brown conidiophores; mono- or polyblastic, holoblastic, determinate, terminal, cylindrical conidiogenous cells and acrogenous, solitary, olivaceous to brown, euseptate or distoseptate conidia (Su et al. 2016, Luo et al. 2018, Yang et al. 2018, Hyde et al. 2019, Luo et al. 2019). The monotypic family Distoseptisporaceae was established to accommodate Distoseptispora in Sordariomycetes (Su et al. 2016, Hyde et al. 2020). The freshwater genus Aquapteridospora J. Yang, K.D. Hyde & Maharachch was introduced by Yang et al. (2015) and was treated as Diaporthomycetidae genera incertae sedis, based on LSU sequence data. In a comprehensive study of freshwater Sordariomycetes, Luo et al. (2019) established Distoseptisporales and placed Distoseptisporaceae and Aquapteridospora within this order. Aquapteridospora differs from Distoseptispora in having polyblastic conidiogenous cells, bearing tiny, circular scars and protuberant, fusiform conidia. This treatment was followed by Hyde et al. (2020). However, Wijayawardene et al. (2020) only accepted Distoseptisporaceae in Distoseptisporales, while Aquapteridospora was placed in Diaporthomycetidae genera incertae sedis.

Currently, 25 species are accepted in Distoseptospora, of which 16 are from freshwater habitats and nine from terrestrial (Luo et al. 2018, Tibpromma et al. 2018, Crous et al. 2019, Hyde et al. 2019, Luo et al. 2019, Phookamsak et al. 2019). Distoseptispora caricis is the only reported endophytic species, while the others are saprobes.

During ongoing surveys of microfungi on medicinal plants, two Distoseptispora species were collected in China and Thailand. We introduce Distoseptispora bambusae as a novel taxon with illustrations and molecular phylogenetic data. We also provide newly-generated molecular data of the second species, D. tectona Doilom & K.D. Hyde, which was also reported from Thailand (Hyde et al. 2016).

Materials and methods

Collections and examination of specimens

Specimens of bamboo culms were collected from Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China (August 2019) and Doi Mae Salong, Chiang Rai, Thailand (July 2015). Another specimen of dead wood was collected from the Botanical Garden, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand (November 2019). The samples were processed and examined following the method described by Dai et al. (2017). Samples were brought to the laboratory in an envelope after recording the collection details including hosts, places and dates. Morphological observations were made using a stereomicroscope (SteREO Discovery. V12, Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmBH, Germany). Fruiting bodies were transferred with a needle and placed in a drop of distilled water on a glass slide, then covered with the cover slip for microscopic studies and photomicrography. The morphological figures were captured using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni compound microscope (Nikon, Japan) fitted with a NikonDS-Ri2 digital camera (Nikon, Japan). Measurements were made using the Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work software. Photo-plates were made with Adobe Photoshop CS6 software (Adobe Systems, USA).

Single-spore isolations were done following the method described in (Chomnunti et al. 2014). Germinated spores were transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA: 39 g/l sterile distilled water, Difco potato dextrose) plates and incubated at room temperature for 4 weeks. Herbarium materials were deposited in the Fungarium of Mae Fah Luang University (MFLU), Chiang Rai, Thailand. Pure cultures were deposited in the Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC) and International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants (ICMP). Facesoffungi (FoF) and Index Fungorum numbers were acquired as described in Jayasiri et al. (2015) and Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Fresh fungal mycelia were scraped with sterilised scalpels. Genomic DNA was extracted using Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (GD2416) following the manufacture’s protocol. PCR amplifications were performed in a 20 μl reaction volume, with 10 μl of 10 × PCR Master Mix, 1 μl of each primer, 1 μl template DNA and 7 μl ddH2O. Primers used and PCR thermal cycle programmers are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Primers and PCR protocols.

Locus Primer PCR protocol Reference
Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) ITS5
ITS4		 1. 94℃ – 3 min
2. 94℃ – 30 s
3. 52℃ – 30 s
4. 72℃ – 1 min
5. Repeat 2–4 for 35 cycles
6. 72℃ – 8 min
7. 4℃ on hold		 White et al. (1990)
Large Subunit rRNA (LSU, 28S) LR0R
LR5		 Same protocol as ITS region White et al. (1990), Rehner and Samuels (1995)
RNA polymerase II Subunit 2 (RPB2) RPB2-5f
RPB2-7cR		 1. 94℃ – 3 min
2. 94℃ – 20 sec
3. 55℃ – 30 sec
4. 72℃ – 1 min
5. Repeat 2–4 for 40 cycles
6. 72℃ – 10 min
7. 4℃ on hold		 Liu et al. (1999)
Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic analyses

Sequences (Table 2) generated during this study were complemented with sequences from previous studies (Hyde et al. 2016, Su et al. 2016, Luo et al. 2018, Crous et al. 2019, Hyde et al. 2019, Luo et al. 2019), which were downloaded from NCBI GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). Alignments for each locus were done in MAFFT v7.212 (Katoh and Standley 2013) and checked visually using AliView (Larsson 2014). The alignments were trimmed using trimAl v 1.2 with gappyout (Capella-Gutiérrez et al. 2009). Three single gene alignments were combined using Sequence Matrix (Vaidya et al. 2011). The final alignment was deposited in TreeBASE (submission ID: http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S26081).

Table 2.

GenBank accession numbers of isolates included in this study.

The newly-obtained strains are are indicated with ※ after collection number. Ex-type strains are in bold.

Abbreviation: CBS: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CGMCC: China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; DLUCC: Dali University Culture Collection, Yunnan, China; HKUCC: The University of Hong Kong Culture Collection, Hong Kong, China; HKAS: Kunming Institute of Botany Academia Sinica, Yunnan, China, ICMP: International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants, Auckland, New Zealand; MFLU: the herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Additional sequence of D. bambusae MFLUCC 20–0091: SSU: MT232716, TEF: MT232880

Species Strain ITS LSU RPB2
Aquapteridospora lignicola MFLUCC 15–0377 KU221018
Aquapteridospora fusiformis MFLU 18–1601 MK828652 MK849798
D. aquatica MFLUCC 15–0374 NR154040 KU376268
D. aquatica S-965 MK828647 MK849792 MN124537
D. aquatica MFLUCC 18–0646 MK828648 MK849793
D. aquatica MFLUCC 16–0904 MK828649 MK849794
D. aquatica MFLUCC 16–1254 MK849795
D. aquatica MFLUCC 16–1357 MK828650 MK849796
D. bambusae MFLUCC 20–0091※ MT232713 MT232718 MT232881
D. bambusae MFLUCC 14–0583※ MT232712 MT232717 MT232882
D. cangshanensis MFLUCC 16–0970 MG979754 MG979761
D. caricis CBS 146041 MN562124 MN567632 MN556805
D. dehongensis KUMCC 18–0090 MK085061 MK079662
D. fluminicola MFLUCC 15–0417 NR154041 KU376270
D. fluminicola DLUCC 0391 MG979755 MG979762
D. fluminicola. DLUCC 0999 MG979756 MG979763
D. guttulata MFLUCC 16–0183 MF077543 MF077554
D. guttulata DLUCC B43 MN163011 MN163016
D. leonensisi HKUCC 10822 DQ408566 DQ435089
D. lignicola MFLUCC 18–0198 MK828651 MK849797
D. martini CGMCC 3.18651 KU999975 KX033566
D. multiseptata MFLUCC 16–1044 MF077544 MF077555 MF135644
D. multiseptata MFLUCC 15–0609 KX710145 KX710140
D. multiseptata MFLUCC 18–0215 MN163013 MN174864
D neorostrata MFLUCC 18–0376 MN163008 MN163017
D. obclavata MFLUCC 18–0329 MN163012 MN163010
D. obpyriformis MFLUCC 17–1694 MG979764 MG988415
D. obpyriformis DLUCC 0867 MG979757 MG979765 MG988416
D. palmarum MFLUCC 18–1446 MK085062 MK079663 MK087670
D. phangngaensis MFLUCC 16–0857 MF077545 MF077556
D. rostrata MFLUCC 16–0969 MG979758 MG979766 MG988417
D. rostrata DLUCC 0885 MG979759 MG979767
D. submersa MFLUCC 16–0946 MG979760 MG979768 MG988418
D. suoluoensis MFLUCC 17–1305 MF077547 MF077558
D. suoluoensis MFLUCC 17–0224 MF077546 MF077557
Distoseptispora. sp HLXM–15–1 KU376269
D. rayongensis MFLUCC 18–0415 MH457172 MH457137 MH463255
D. rayongensis MFLUCC 18–0416 MH457173 MH457138 MH463256
D. tectonae MFLUCC 12–0291 KX751711 KX751713 KX751708
D. tectonae MFLUCC 20–0090※ MT232714 MT232719
D. tectonigena MFLUCC 12–0292 KX751712 KX751714 KX751709
D. thailandica MFLUCC 16–0270 MH275060 MH260292
D. thysanolaenae HKAS 102247 NR164041 MK064091
D. xishuangbannaensis KUMCC 17–0290 MH275061 MH260293 MH412754
Open in a new tab

The Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis was performed using IQ-tree (Nguyen et al. 2015, Chernomor et al. 2016). Nucleotide substitution models were selected under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) by jModelTest2 (Darriba et al. 2012) on XSEDE in the CIPRES web portal (Miller et al. 2010). For ITS dataset, the GTR+I+G model was selected (-lnL=3364.5406), for LSU, the TIM2+I+G model (-lnL = 959.3999), and for RPB2, the GTR+I+G (-lnL= 5111.0788). ML was inferred under partitioned models. Non-parametric bootstrap analysis was implemented with 1000 replicates.

Maximum Parsimony (MP) analysis was carried out with the heuristic search in PAUP v. 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002). All characters were unordered and of equal weight, and gaps were treated as missing data. Maxtrees were unlimited, branches of zero length were collapsed and all multiple, equally-parsimonious trees were saved. Clade stability was assessed using a bootstrap (BT) analysis with 1,000 replicates, each with 10 replicates of random stepwise addition of taxa (Hillis and Bull 1993).

Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis was performed by the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling (MCMC) coalescent approach implemented in BEAST v1.8.4 (Drummond et al. 2012), with an uncorrelated lognormal relaxed clock. The Birth-Death Incomplete Sampling speciation model (Stadler 2009) was selected as tree prior. The nucleotide substitution models were the same as above. Markov chains were run for 1,000,000 generations and trees were sampled every 1000th generation. The XML file generated by BEAUti (Drummond et al. 2012) was run using BEAST on XSEDE in the CIPRES web portal (Miller et al. 2010). Tracer v1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2014) was used to check the resulting log file. The first 20% of trees, representing the burn-in phase of the analyses, were discarded and a Maximum Clade Credibility tree was inferred using TreeAnnotator 1.8.4.

Trees were visualised with FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut 2009) and the layout was edited using Adobe Illustrator CS6 software (Adobe Systems, USA).

Taxon treatments

Distoseptispora bambusae

Y.R. Sun, I.D. Goonasekara, Yong Wang bis & K.D. Hyde sp. nov.

580E5F7E-10E0-5AFA-BDF3-FDA7DAB58F19

557452

Materials

  1. Type status: Holotype. Occurrence: catalogNumber: MFLU 20–0261; recordedBy: Sun Ya-Ru; Taxon: scientificName: Distoseptispora bambusae; class: Sordariomycetes; order: Distoseptisporales; family: Distoseptisporaceae; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Guizhou; locality: Guiyang Medicinal Plants Garden; verbatimElevation: 1100 m; Identification: identifiedBy: Yaru Sun; dateIdentified: 2019

  2. Type status: Paratype. Occurrence: catalogNumber: MFLU 17–1653; recordedBy: Thambugala Kasun M.; Taxon: scientificName: Distoseptispora bambusae; class: Sordariomycetes; order: Distoseptisporales; family: Distoseptisporaceae; Location: country: Thailand; stateProvince: Chiangrai; locality: Doi Mae Salong; verbatimElevation: 390 m; Identification: identifiedBy: Yaru Sun; dateIdentified: 2019

Description

Saprobic on culms of bamboo. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous (Figs 1, 2). Colonies effuse, brown to dark-brown, hairy. Mycelium mostly immersed, composed of pale to dark brown, septate, branched, smooth, hyaline to subhyaline hyphae. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, septate, single or in groups of 2 or 3, erect, cylindrical, straight or slightly flexuous, olivaceous or brown, robust at the base 40–96 × 4–5.5 μm (x̅ = 69 × 5 μm, n = 10). Conidiogenous cells blastic, integrated, terminal, cylindrical, olivaceous or brown 9–19 × 4–5 μm (x̅ = 15 × 4.5 μm, n = 15). Conidia acrogenous, solitary, straight, obclavate, septate, thick-walled, rounded at the apex, truncate at the base, tapering towards apex, olivaceous or brown, 45–74 μm long (x̅ = 60.5 μm, n = 20), 5.5–9.5 μm at the widest (x̅ = 7.5 μm, n = 20).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Distoseptispora bambusae (MFLU 20–0261, holotype, collected from China) a, b. Colonies on natural substrate; c, d. Conidiophore with Conidia; e. Conidiophore; f. Conidiogenous cell; g–j. Conidia; k. Germinating conidium; l, m. Colony on PDA. Scale bars: c–e, k = 20 μm, f–j = 10 μm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Distoseptispora bambusae (MFLU 17–1653, paratype, collected from Thailand). a, b. Colonies on natural substrate; c–g. Conidia attached to conidiophores; h–k. Conidia; l. Germinating conidium. Scale Bars: c = 50 μm, d–l = 25 μm.

Culture characteristics: Conidia germinated on PDA within 12 hours and germ tubes were produced from both ends. Colony reached 30 mm in 4 weeks at 26℃ on PDA media, circular, flat, surface rough, grey from above, brown from below, edge entire.

Notes

The morphological characteristics of Distoseptispora bambusae match well with the generic concept of Distoseptispora (Su et al. 2016). Multi-gene analyses showed that D. bambusae is a phylogenetically-distinct species, most closely related to D. suoluoensis, a species isolated from submerged wood in a freshwater habitat (Yang et al. 2018). Distoseptispora bambusae has shorter conidiophores (40–96 vs. 80–250 μm) and shorter conidia (45–74 vs. (65–) 80–125(–145) μm) than those of D. suoluoensis (Yang et al. 2018). Our two specimens of D. bambusae were similar in morphology, but polyblastic conidiogenous cells were observed from the Chinese specimen, while the Thai specimen has only monoblastic conidiogenous cells. These may be due to geographical differences and the different observation period. Although the two strains clustered together with short branches in the phylogenetic tree, comparisons of ITS sequences showed that there are 3 bp (base pair) differences without gaps between two strains and we identified them as the same species following the guidelines for species delineation proposed by Jeewon and Hyde (2016).

Etymology

Bambusae, referring to the host.

Distoseptispora tectonae

Doilom & K.D. Hyde Fungal Diversity 81: 222 (2016)

72524FBE-F283-56B0-BE4E-649E0D85BC45

552223

Materials

  1. Type status: Other material. Occurrence: catalogNumber: MFLU 20–0262; Taxon: scientificName: Distoseptispora tectonae; class: Sordariomycetes; order: Distoseptisporales; family: Distoseptisporaceae; Location: country: Thailand; stateProvince: Chiangrai; locality: Mae Fah Luang University, Botanical Garden; verbatimElevation: 390 m

Description

Saprobic on stems of dead wood. Sexual morph: Unknown. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous (Fig. 3). Colonies effuse, brown to dark brown, hairy. Mycelium mostly immersed, composed of brown, septate, branched hyphae. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, septate, single or in groups of two, straight or slightly flexuous, cylindrical, dark brown, 34–95 × 5–8 μm (x̅ = 61.5 × 6 μm, n = 15). Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal, monoblastic, cylindrical, brown. Conidia acrogenous, solitary, straight or slightly flexuous, rostrate, 11–23-distoseptate, differently constricted at the septa, thick-walled, truncate at the base, tapering towards apex, brown at the base, pale brown at the apex, 89–176 μm long (x̅ = 121 μm, n = 25), 12–19 μm at the widest (x̅ = 15 μm, n = 25).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Distoseptispora tectonae (MFLU 20–0262). a. Colonies on natural substrate; b. Conidiogenous cell; c–e. Conidiophores and conidia; f–i. Conidia; j. Germinating conidium. Scale bars: b = 10 μm, a, c–j = 50 μm.

Culture characteristics: Conidia germinated on PDA within 12 hours and germ tubes were produced from both ends. On PDA, colony circular, reaching 40 mm diam after 4 weeks at 26℃, brown from above, dark brown from below, surface flat and slightly rough, edge entire.

Notes

Distoseptispora tectonae was introduced by Hyde et al. (2016), from a terrestrial habitat in Thailand. Distoseptispora tectonae has macronematous, cylindrical, septate conidiophores, monoblastic, integrated, terminal, cylindrical conidiogenous cells and obclavate, straight or slightly curved, septate, smooth conidia. Our collection was also from Thailand. The morphological characters of our collection are the same as in the holotype, except that our isolate has longer and wider conidiophores (34–95 × 5–8 μm vs. up to 40 × 4–6 μm) and less septa (11–23 vs. 20–28), compared to those of D. tectonae MFLUCC 12–0291. In this study, we also provide new sequences for D. tectonae.

Analysis

Partial nucleotide sequences of the LSU, ITS and RPB2 were used to determine the phylogenetic position of the taxa isolated. Sequences of 47 strains retrieved from GenBank, representing species of Distoseptispora and two outgroups A. fusiformis (MFLU 18–1601) and A. lignicola (MFLUCC 15–0377), were analysed. Single gene analyses were done to compare the topologies and clade stabilities, respectively. Nucleotide substitution models were selected by jModelTest2 on XEDE (Drummond et al. 2012). For the ITS and RPB2 dataset, the GTR+I+G model was selected, for LSU, the TIM2+I+G. The manually-adjusted LSU, ITS and RPB2 alignment comprised a total of 2,246 characters (768 for LSU; 436 for ITS; 1,042 for RPB2), including coded alignment gaps. Amongst them, 1,471 characters were constant, 195 variable characters were parsimony-uninformative and number of parsimony-informative characters was 580. One thousand equally most parsimonious trees (Tree length = 1799, CI = 0.640, RI = 0.733, RC = 0.469, HI = 0.360) were yielded from the heuristic search. MP, ML and Bayesian analyses of the combined dataset inferred similar topologies, respectively. The "most likelihood" tree is presented (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) tree, based on analysis of a combined dataset of LSU, ITS and RPB2 sequence data. Bootstrap support values for ML and MP greater than 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 0.95 are given near nodes, respectively. The tree is rooted with Aquapteridospora fusiformis (MFLU 18–1601) and A. lignicola (MFLUCC 15–0377). The ex-type strains are indicated in bold and the new isolates are in red.

In the phylogenetic analyses, generated by ML, MP and BI analysis, the two Distoseptispora bambusae isolates clustered with strong support (80%, 92%, 0.97). They formed a sister clade with D. suoluoensis with high support (95%, 94%, 0.95). Our isolate D. tectonae (MFLUCC 20–0090) grouped with D. tectonae (MFLUCC 12–0291) with strong ML, MP and BI support (96%, 80%, 0.97), indicating they are the same species.

Discussion

In this study, two collections from China and Thailand, representing a new Distoseptispora species, is introduced, based on morphology and phylogenetic analysis. The two samples were both found on bamboo from terrestrial habitats. It is the fourth species found from medicinal plants. The other three are D. palmarum, D. thailandica and D. xishuangbannaensis (Tibpromma et al. 2018, Hyde et al. 2019).

Distoseptispora species does not seem to have specific habitat preferences. Most of them are reported from submerged wood in freshwater habitats, while some species have been introduced from terrestrial habitats (Luo et al. 2018, Tibpromma et al. 2018, Hyde et al. 2019, Luo et al. 2019, Phookamsak et al. 2019). So far, Distoseptispora were only found in China and Thailand. They may exist in other countries, waiting to be discovered on the basis of their diverse habitats.

The asexual morph of Distoseptispora is similar to Sporidesmium in producing holoblastic, euseptate or distoseptate conidia and blastic, terminal conidiogenous cells (Shenoy et al. 2006, Luo et al. 2018, Yang et al. 2018). Sexual morphs of Distoseptispora have not been reported.

Acrodictys martini was transferred to Distoseptispora as D. martini by Xia et al. (2017), based on their phylogenetic analysis. However, this species morphologically resembles Acrodictys rather than Distoseptispora. Therefore, the molecular data of Distoseptispora martini may need further verification (Luo et al. 2018).

It is interesting to note that, in most species of Distoseptispora, the conidia are longer than their conidiophores, while in some, they are shorter than their conidiophores. However, this characteristic does not reflect their phylogenetic position. For example, D. obpyriformis Z.L. Luo & H.Y. Su, a species that has long conidia and short conidiophores and D. rostrata Z.L. Luo, K.D. Hyde & H.Y. Su that has longer conidiophores, but shorter conidia, form a sister clade in the phylogenetic tree.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Distoseptispora bambusae
BDJ.8.e53678-treatment1.xml (19KB, xml)
XML Treatment for Distoseptispora tectonae
BDJ.8.e53678-treatment2.xml (13.4KB, xml)

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the following projects: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31972222, 31560489), Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 Program, D20023), Science and Technology basic work of MOST [2014FY120100], Talent project of Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Platform ([2017]5788-5 and [2019]5641) and Guizhou Science, Technology Department International Cooperation Basic project ([2018]5806), Construction Program of Biology First-class Discipline in Guizhou (GNYL[2017]009), Guizhou University cultivation project [2017]5788-33, Science and technology major project of Guizhou Province ([2019]3005). We would like to thank Dr. Eric H. C. McKenzie for suggestions on the morphology and Dr. Shaun Pennycook for checking the nomenclature. Kevin D. Hyde would thank the Thailand Research grants entitled “Impact of climate change on fungal diversity and biogeography in the Greater Mekong Subregion” (grant no: RDG6130001).

References

  1. Capella-Gutiérrez Salvador, Silla-Martínez José M, Gabaldón Toni. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(15):1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chernomor Olga, Von Haeseler Arndt, Minh Bui Quang. Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Systematic Biology. 2016;65(6):997–1008. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chomnunti Putarak, Hongsanan Sinang, Aguirre-Hudson Begoña, Tian Qing, Peršoh Derek, Dhami Manpreet K, Alias Aisyah S, Xu Jian Chu, Liu Xing Zhong, Stadler Marc, Hyde Kevin D. The sooty moulds. Fungal Diversity. 2014;66:1–36. doi: 10.1007/s13225-014-0278-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crous P W, Wingfield M J, Lombard L, Roets F, Swart W J, Alvarado P, Carnegie A J, Moreno G, Luangsa-Ard J, Thangavel R, Alexandrova A V, Baseia I G, Bellanger J M, Bessette A E, Bessette A R, Delapeña-Lastra S, García D, Gené J, Pham T H G, Heykoop M, Malysheva E, Malysheva V, Martín M P, Morozova O V, Noisripoom W, Overton B E, Rea A E, Sewall B J, Smith M E, Smyth C W, Tasanathai K, Visagie C M, Adamčík S, Alves A, Andrade J P, Aninat M J, Araújo R V B, Bordallo J J, Boufleur T, Baroncelli R, Barreto R W, Bolin J, Cabero J, Cabo M, Cafà G, Caffot M L H, Cai L, Carlavilla J R, Chávez R, Decastro R R L, Delgat L, Deschuyteneer D, Dios M M, Domínguez L S, Evans H C, Eyssartier G, Ferreira B W, Figueiredo C N, Liu F, Fournier J, Galli-Terasawa L V, Gil-Durán C, Glienke C, Gonçalves M F M, Gryta H, Guarro J, Himaman W, Hywel-Jones N, Iturrieta-González I, Ivanushkina N E, Jargeat P, Khalid A N, Khan J, Kiran M, Kiss L, Kochkina G A, Kolařík M, Kubátová A, Lodge D J, Loizides M, Luque D, Manjón J L, Marbach P A S, Massolajr N S, Mata M, Miller A N, Mongkolsamrit S, Moreau P A, Morte A, Mujic A, Navarro-Ródenas A, Németh M Z, Nóbrega T F, Nováková A, Olariaga I, Ozerskaya S M, Palma M A, Petters-Vandresen D A L, Piontelli E, Popov E S, Rodríguez A, Requejo Ó, Rodrigues A C M, Rong I H, Roux J, Seifert K A, Silva B D B, Sklenář F, Smith J A, Sousa J O, Souza H G, Desouza J T, Švec K, Tanchaud P, Tanney J B, Terasawa F, Thanakitpipattana D, Torres-Garcia D, Vaca I, Vaghefi N, van Iperen A L, Vasilenko O V, Verbeken A, Yilmaz N, Zamora J C, Zapata M, Jurjević Ž, Groenewald J Z. Fungal Planet description sheets: 951–1041. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj/2019/00000043/00000001/art00007. Persoonia. 2019;43:223–425. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2019.43.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dai Dong Qin, Phookamsak Rungtiwa, Wijayawardene Nalin N, Li Wen Jing, Bhat D Jayarama, Xu Jian Chu, Taylor Joanne E, Hyde Kevin D, Chukeatirote E. Bambusicolous fungi. Fungal Diversity. 2017;82(1):1–105. doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0367-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Darriba Diego, Taboada Guillermo L, Doallo Ramón, Posada David. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods. 2012;9(8):772–772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Drummond Alexei J, Suchard Marc A, Xie Dong, Rambaut Andrew. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2012;29(8):1969–1973. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hillis David M, Bull James J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology. 1993;42(2):182–192. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hyde Kevin D, Hongsanan Sinang, Jeewon Rajesh, Bhat D. Jayarama, McKenzie Eric H C, Jones E B Gareth, Phookamsak Rungtiwa, Ariyawansa Hiran A, Boonmee Saranyaphat, Zhao Qi, Abdel-Aziz Faten Awad, Abdel-Wahab Mohamed A, Banmai Supharat, Chomnunti Putarak, Cui Bao Kai, Daranagama Dinushani A, Das Kanad, Dayarathne Monika C, de Silva Nimali I, Dissanayake Asha J, Doilom Mingkwan, Ekanayaka Anusha H, Gibertoni Tatiana Baptista, Góes-Neto Aristóteles, Huang Shi Ke, Jayasiri Subashini C, Jayawardena Ruvishika S, Konta Sirinapa, Lee Hyang Burm, Li Wen Jing, Lin Chuan Gen, Liu Jian Kui, Lu Yong Zhong, Luo Zong Long, Manawasinghe Ishara S, Manimohan Patinjareveettil, Mapook Ausana, Niskanen Tuula, Norphanphoun Chada, Papizadeh Moslem, Perera Rekhani H, Phukhamsakda Chayanard, Richter Christian, de A Santiago André L C M, Drechsler-Santos E Ricardo, Senanayake Indunil C, Tanaka Kazuaki. Fungal diversity notes 367–490: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity. 2016;80:1–270. doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0373-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hyde Kevin D, Tennakoon Danushka S, Jeewon Rajesh, Bhat D. Jayarama, Maharachchikumbura Sajeewa S N, Rossi Walter, Leonardi Marco, Lee Hyang Burm, Mun Hye Yeon, Houbraken Jos, Nguyen Thuong T T, Jeon Sun Jeong, Frisvad Jens Christian, Wanasinghe Dhanushka N, Lücking Robert, Aptroot André, Cáceres Marcela E S, Karunarathna Samantha C, Hongsanan Sinang, Phookamsak Rungtiwa, de Silva Nimali I, Thambugala Kasun M, Jayawardena Ruvishika S, Senanayake Indunil C, Boonmee Saranyaphat, Chen Jie, Luo Zong Long, Phukhamsakda Chayanard, Pereira Olinto L, Abreu Vanessa P, Rosado André Wilson Campos, Bart Buyck, Randrianjohany Emile, Hofstetter Valérie, Gibertoni Tatiana B, Soares Adriene Mayra da Silva, Plautz Helio Longoni, Sotão Helen Maria Pontes, Xavier William Kalhy Silva, Bezerra Jadson Diogo Pereira, de Oliveira Thays Gabrielle Lins, de Souza-Motta Cristina Maria, Magalhães Oliane Maria Correia, Bundhun Digvijayini, Harishchandra Dulanjalee, Manawasinghe Ishara S, Dong Wei, Zhang Sheng Nan, Bao Dan Feng, Samarakoon Milan C, Pem Dhandevi, Karunarathna Anuruddha, Lin Chuan Gen, Yang Jing, Perera Rekhani H, Kumar Vinit, Huang Shi-Ke, Dayarathne Monika C, Ekanayaka Anusha H., Jayasiri Subashini C, Xiao Yuan Pin, Konta Sirinapa, Niskanen Tuula, Liimatainen Kare, Dai Yu-Cheng, Ji Xiao Hong, Tian Xue Mei, Mešić Armin, Singh Sanjay K, Phutthacharoen Kunthida, Cai Lei, Sorvongxay Touny, Thiyagaraja Vinodhini, Norphanphoun Chada, Chaiwan Napalai, Lu Yong Zhong, Jiang Hong Bo, Zhang Jin Feng, Abeywickrama Pranami D, Aluthmuhandiram Janith V S, Brahmanage Rashika S, Zeng Ming, Chethana Thilini, Wei De Ping, Réblová Martina, Fournier Jacques, Nekvindová Jana, do Nascimento Barbosa Renan, dos Santos José Ewerton Felinto, de Oliveira Neiva Tinti, Li Guo Jie, Ertz Damien, Shang Qiu Ju, Phillips Alan J L, Kuo Chang Hsin, Camporesi Erio, Bulgakov Timur S, Lumyong Saisamorn, Jones E B Gareth, Chomnunti Putarak, Gentekaki Eleni, Bungartz Frank, Zeng Xiang Yu, Fryar Sally, Tkalčec Zdenko, Liang Jun Min, Li Guang Shuo, Wen Ting Chi, Singh Paras Nath, Gafforov Yusufjon, Promputtha Itthayakorn, Yasanthika Erandi, Goonasekara Ishani D, Zhao Rui Lin, Zhao Qi, Kirk Paul M, Liu Jian Kui, Yan Ji Ye, Mortimer Peter E, Xu Jian Chu, Doilom Mingkwan. Fungal diversity notes 1036–1150: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity. 2019;96:1–242. doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00429-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyde K D, Norphanphoun C, Maharachchikumbura S S N, Bhat D J, Jones E B G, Bundhun D, Chen Y J, Bao D F, Boonmee S, Calabon M S, Chaiwan N, Chethana K W T, Dai D Q, Dayarathne M C, Devadatha B, Dissanayake A J, Dissanayake L S, Doilom M, Dong W, Fan X L, Goonasekara I D, Hongsanan S, Huang S K, Jayawardena R S, Jeewon R, Karunarathna A, Konta S, Kumar V, Lin C G, Liu J K, Liu N G, Luangsa-ard J, Lumyong S, Luo Z L, Marasinghe D S, McKenzie E H C, Niego A G T, Niranjan M, Perera R H, Phukhamsakda C, Rathnayaka A R, Samarakoon M C, Samarakoon S M B C, Sarma V V, Senanayake I C, Shang Q J, Stadler M, Tibpromma S, Wanasinghe D N, Wei D P, Wijayawardene N N, Xiao Y P, Yang J, Zeng X Y, Zhang S N, Xiang M M. Refined families of Sordariomycetes. Mycosphere. 2020;11(1):305–1059. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jayasiri Subashini C, Hyde Kevin D, Ariyawansa Hiran A, Bhat Jayarama, Buyck Bart, Cai Lei, Dai Yu Cheng, Abd-Elsalam Kamel A, Ertz Damien, Hidayat Iman, Jeewon Rajesh, Jones E B Gareth, Bahkali Ali H, Karunarathna Samantha C, Liu Jian Kui, Luangsa-ard J Jennifer, Lumbsch H Thorsten, Maharachchikumbura Sajeewa S N, McKenzie Eric H C, Moncalvo Jean Marc, Ghobad-Nejhad Masoomeh, Nilsson Henrik, Pang Ka Lai, Pereira Olinto L, Phillips Alan J L, Raspé Olivier, Rollins Adam W, Romero Andrea I, Etayo Javier, Selçuk Faruk, Stephenson Steven L, Suetrong Satinee, Taylor Joanne E, Tsui Clement K M, Vizzini Alfredo, Abdel-Wahab Mohamed A, Wen Ting Chi, Boonmee Saranyaphat, Dai Dong Qin, Daranagama Dinushani A, Dissanayake Asha J, Ekanayaka Anusha H, Fryar S C, Hongsanan Sinang, Jayawardena Ruvishika S, Li Wen Jing, Perera Rekhani H, Phookamsak R, de Silva Nimali I, Thambugala Kasun M, Tian Qing, Wijayawardene Nalin N, Zhao Rui Lin, Zhao Qi, Kang Ji Chuan, Promputtha Itthayakorn. The faces of Fungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Diversity. 2015;74:3–18. doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jeewon R, Hyde K D. Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere. 2016;7(11):1669–1677. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Katoh Kazutaka, Standley Daron M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30(4):772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Larsson Anders. AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(22):3276–3278. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu Yajuan J, Whelen Sally, Hall Benjamin D. Phylogenetic relationships among Ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1999;16(12):1799–1808. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Luo Z L, Hyde K D, Liu J K, Bhat D J, Bao D F, Li W L, Su Hong Yan. Lignicolous freshwater fungi from China II: Novel Distoseptispora (Distoseptisporaceae) species from northwestern Yunnan Province and a suggested unified method for studying lignicolous freshwater fungi. Mycosphere. 2018;9(3):444–461. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/9/3/2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Luo Zong Long, Hyde Kevin D, Liu Jian Kui, Maharachchikumbura Sajeewa S N, Jeewon Rajesh, Bao Dan Feng, Bhat Darbhe Jayarama, Lin Chuan Gen, Li Wen Li, Yang Jing, Liu Ning Guo, Lu Yong Zhong, Jayawardena Ruvishika S, Li Jun Fu, Su Hong Yan. Freshwater Sordariomycetes. Fungal Diversity. 2019;99 doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00438-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller Mark A, Pfeiffer Wayne, Schwartz Terri. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees; In, Proceedings of the 2010 gateway computing environments workshop (GCE), New Orleans, Louisiana; 2010. 7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nguyen Lam-Tung, Schmidt Heiko A, Von Haeseler Arndt, Minh Bui Quang. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2015;32(1):268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Phookamsak Rungtiwa, Hyde Kevin D, Jeewon Rajesh, Bhat D. Jayarama, Gareth Jones E B., Maharachchikumbura Sajeewa S N, Raspé Olivier, Karunarathna Samantha C, Wanasinghe Dhanushka N, Hongsanan Sinang, Doilom Mingkwan, Tennakoon Danushka S, Machado Alexandre R, Firmino André L, Ghosh Aniket, Karunarathna Anuruddha, Mešić Armin, Dutta Arun Kumar, Thongbai Benjarong, Devadatha Bandarupalli, Norphanphoun Chada, Senwanna Chanokned, Wei De Ping, Pem Dhandevi, Ackah Frank Kwekucher, Wang Gen Nuo, Jiang Hong Bo, Madrid Hugo, Lee Hyang Burm, Goonasekara Ishani D, Manawasinghe Ishara S, Kušan Ivana, Cano Josep, Gené Josepa, Li Jun Fu, Das Kanad, Acharya Krishnendu, Raj K N Anil, Latha K P Deepna, Chethana K W Thilini, He Mao Qiang, Dueñas Margarita, Jadan Margita, Martín María P, Samarakoon Milan C, Dayarathne Monika C, Raza Mubashar, Park Myung Soo, Telleria M Teresa, Chaiwan Napalai, Matočec Neven, de Silva Nimali I, Pereira Olinto L, Singh Paras Nath, Manimohan Patinjareveettil, Uniyal Priyanka, Shang Qiu Ju, Bhatt Rajendra P, Perera Rekhani H, Alvarenga Renato Lúcio Mendes, Nogal-Prata Sandra, Singh Sanjay K, Vadthanarat Santhiti, Oh Seung Yoon, Huang Shi Ke, Rana Shiwali, Konta Sirinapa, Paloi Soumitra, Jayasiri Subashini C, Jeon Sun Jeong, Mehmood Tahir, Gibertoni Tatiana Baptista, Nguyen Thuong T T, Singh Upendra, Thiyagaraja Vinodhini, Sarma V Venkateswara, Dong Wei, Yu Xian Dong, Lu Yong Zhong, Lim Young Woon, Chen Yun, Tkalčec Zdenko, Zhang Zhi Feng, Luo ZongLong, Daranagama Dinushani A, Thambugala Kasun M, Tibpromma Saowaluck, Camporesi Erio, Bulgakov Timur S, Dissanayake Asha J, Senanayake Indunil C, Dai Dong Qin, Tang Li Zhou, Khan Sehroon, Zhang Huang, Promputtha Itthayakorn, Cai Lei, Chomnunti Putarak, Zhao Rui Lin, Lumyong Saisamorn, Boonmee Saranyaphat, Wen Ting Chi, Mortimer Peter E, Xu Jian Chu. Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Diversity. 2019;95:1–273. doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00421-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rambaut A. FigTree: Tree figure drawing tool, version 1.4.4. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh. 2009
  23. Rambaut A, Suchard M A, Xie D, Drummond A J. Tracer v1.6. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/ 2014
  24. Rehner Stephen A, Samuels Gary J. Molecular systematics of the Hypocreales: a teleomorph gene phylogeny and the status of their anamorphs. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1995;73(S1):816–823. doi: 10.1139/b95-327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shenoy Belle Damodara, Jeewon Rajesh, Wu Wen P P, Bhat Darbhe Jayarama, Hyde Kevin D. Ribosomal and RPB2 DNA sequence analyses suggest that Sporidesmium and morphologically similar genera are polyphyletic. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095375620600195X. Mycological Research. 2006;110:916–928. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stadler Tanja. On incomplete sampling under birth–death models and connections to the sampling-based coalescent. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2009;261(1):58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Su Hong Yan, Hyde Kevin D, Maharachchikumbura Sajeewa S N, Ariyawansa Hiran A, Luo Zong Long, Promputtha Itthayakorn, Tian Qing, Lin Chuan Gen, Shang Qiu Ju, Zhao Yong Chang, Chai Hong Mei, Liu Xiao Ying, Bahkali Ali H, Bhat Jayarama D, McKenzie Eric H C, Zhou De Qun. The families Distoseptisporaceae fam. nov., Kirschsteiniotheliaceae, Sporormiaceae and Torulaceae, with new species from freshwater in Yunnan Province, China. Fungal Diversity. 2016;80:375–409. doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0362-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Swofford D L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0 b10. MA: Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, UK 2002
  29. Tibpromma Saowaluck, Hyde Kevin D, McKenzie Eric H C, Bhat D. Jayarama, Phillips Alan J L, Wanasinghe Dhanushka N, Samarakoon Milan C, Jayawardena Ruvishika S, Dissanayake Asha J, Tennakoon Danushka S, Doilom Mingkwan, Phookamsak Rungtiwa, Tang Alvin M C, Xu Jian Chu, Mortimer Peter E, Promputtha Itthayakorn, Maharachchikumbura Sajeewa S N, Khan Samiullah, Karunarathna Samantha C. Fungal diversity notes 840–928: micro-fungi associated with Pandanaceae. Fungal Diversity. 2018;93:1–160. doi: 10.1007/s13225-018-0408-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vaidya Gaurav, Lohman David J, Meier Rudolf. SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi‐gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics. 2011;27:171–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. White Thomas J, Bruns Thomas, Lee S J W T, Taylor John. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. 315-322PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. (Academic Press) 1990;18 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wijayawardene N N, Hyde K D, Al-Ani L K T, Tedersoo L, Haelewaters Danny, Rajeshkumar K C, Zhao R L, Aptroot A, Leontyev D, Saxena R K, Tokarev Y S, Dai D Q, Letcher P M, Stephenson S L, Ertz D, Lumbsch H T, Kukwa M, Issi I V, Madrid H, Phillips A J L, Selbmann L, Pfliegler W P, Horváth E, Bensch K, Kirk P M, Kolaříková K, Raja H A, Radek R, Papp V, Dima V, Ma J, Malosso E, Takamatsu S, Rambold G, Gannibal P B, Triebel D, Gautam A K, Avasthi S, Suetrong S, Timdal E, Fryar S C, Delgado G, Réblová M, Doilom M, Dolatabadi S, Pawłowska JundefinedZ, Humber RundefinedA, Kodsueb R, Sánchez-Castro I, Goto B T, Silva D K A, de Souza F A, Oehl F, da Silva G A, Silva I R, Błaszkowski J, Jobim K, Maia LundefinedC, Barbosa FundefinedR, Fiuza PundefinedO, Divakar PundefinedK, Shenoy BundefinedD, Castañeda-Ruiz R F, Somrithipol S, Lateef A A, Karunarathna S C, Tibpromma S, Mortimer P E, Wanasinghe D N, Phookamsak R, Xu J, Wang Y, Tian F, Alvarado P, Li D W, Kušan I, Matočec N, Mešić A, Tkalčec Z, Maharachchikumbura SundefinedSundefinedN, Papizadeh M, Heredia G, Wartchow F, Bakhshi M, Boehm E, Youssef N, Hustad VundefinedP, Lawrey JundefinedD, Santiago AundefinedLundefinedCundefinedMundefinedA, Bezerra JundefinedDundefinedP, Souza-Motta CundefinedM, Firmino AundefinedL, Tian Q, Houbraken J, Hongsanan S, Tanaka K, Dissanayake AundefinedJ, Monteiro JundefinedS, Grossart HundefinedP, Suija A, Weerakoon G, Etayo J, Tsurykau A, Vázquez V, Mungai P, Damm U, Li Q R, Zhang H, Boonmee S, Lu Y Z, Becerra A G, Kendrick B, Brearley F Q, Motiejūnaitė J, Sharma B, Khare R, Gaikwad S, Wijesundara DundefinedSundefinedA, Tang LundefinedZ, He MundefinedQ, Flakus A, Rodriguez-Flakus P, Zhurbenko MundefinedP, McKenzie EundefinedHundefinedC, Stadler M, Bhat DundefinedJ, Liu JundefinedK, Raza M, Jeewon R, Nassonova EundefinedS, Prieto M, Jayalal RundefinedGundefinedU, Erdoğdu M, Yurkov A, Schnittler M, Shchepin OundefinedN, Novozhilov YundefinedK, Silva-Filho AundefinedGundefinedS, Gentekaki E, Liu P, Cavender JundefinedC, Kang Y, Mohammad S, Zhang LundefinedF, Xu RundefinedF, Li YundefinedM, Dayarathne MundefinedC, Ekanayaka AundefinedH, Wen TundefinedC, Deng CundefinedY, Pereira OundefinedL, Navathe S, Hawksworth DundefinedL, Fan XundefinedL, Dissanayake LundefinedS, Kuhnert E, Grossart HundefinedP, Thines M. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere. 2020;11(1):1060–1456. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Xia Ji Wen, Ma Ying Rui, Li Zhuang, Zhang Xiu Guo. Acrodictys-like wood decay fungi from southern China, with two new families Acrodictyaceae and Junewangiaceae. Scientific Reports. 2017;7 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08318-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yang Jing, Maharachchikumbura Sajeewa S N, Bhat Darbhe J, McKenzie Eric H C, Bahkali Ali H, Jones E B Gareth, Liu Zuo Yi. Aquapteridospora lignicola gen. et sp. nov., a new hyphomycetous taxon (Sordariomycetes) from wood submerged in a freshwater stream. Cryptogamie, Mycologie. 2015;36(4):469–478. doi: 10.7872/crym/v36.iss4.2015.469. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang Jing, Maharachchikumbura Sajeewa S N, Liu Jian Kui, Hyde Kevin D, Jones E B Gareth, Al-Sadi Abdullah M, Liu Zuo Yi. Pseudostanjehughesia aquitropica gen. et sp. nov. and Sporidesmium sensu lato species from freshwater habitats. Mycological Progress. 2018;17:591–616. doi: 10.1007/s11557-017-1339-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Distoseptispora bambusae
BDJ.8.e53678-treatment1.xml (19KB, xml)
XML Treatment for Distoseptispora tectonae
BDJ.8.e53678-treatment2.xml (13.4KB, xml)

Articles from Biodiversity Data Journal are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES