Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Jun 9;27(6):721–726. doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01802-4

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia incidentally detected on coronary CT angiogram: a do-not-miss diagnosis

Shima Behzad 1, Erik Velez 2, Mohammad Hosein Najafi 1, Ali Gholamrezanezhad 2,
PMCID: PMC7280472  PMID: 32519293

Abstract

Coronary CT angiograms are commonly performed for the evaluation of coronary artery disease and coronary arterial anatomy. However, extracardiac findings are frequently detected on these examinations and often can explain patients’ underlying symptoms, having a significant impact on patient management. Here in, we discuss three cases of incidentally detected novel COVID-19-infected pneumonia (NCIP). This case series highlights the image findings in NCIP and emphasizes the importance of evaluating all organs in the field of view on coronary CT angiograms. In addition, with the ongoing outbreak of COVID-19 and exponentially increasing incidence throughout the world, this report stresses the need for including NCIP in the differential diagnosis of patients with typical image findings in at-risk populations, as early diagnosis is crucial for appropriate patient management and post-exposure recommendations.

Keywords: COVID-19, Novel COVID-19-infected pneumonia, Coronavirus, Coronary, CT angiography, Pneumonia, Atherosclerosis

Introduction

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality around the world, with the use of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) utilizing SPECT and coronary CT angiogram (cCTA) increasing significantly as a means for non-invasively evaluating patients. However, while MPI is performed for assessing myocardial ischemia, coronary artery stenosis, and coronary arterial anatomy, the incidental detection of extracardiac findings is common. A wide array of incidentally detected pathologies have been reported in the literature, including breast cancer, multiple myeloma, cirrhosis, interstitial lung disease, and pneumonia [16]. Extracardiac findings can often be the source of a patient’s presumed cardiac symptoms and it is vital for physicians interpreting examinations to evaluate and report said findings. In this article, we report three cases of confirmed COVID-19 infections incidentally detected on coronary dedicate on coronary CT angiography.

Case series

The first patient is a 60-year-old male with a history of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery 14 years ago, who presented to cardiology with complaints of chest pain, loss of appetite, nausea, and malaise for 5 days without a reported fever or shortness of breath. His past medical history was also significant for diabetes mellitus type 2 and hypercholesterolemia. He underwent a cCTA which demonstrated geographic areas of basilar and peripheral predominant ground glass opacities with subpleural sparing (Fig. 1a). The patient’s coronary artery bypass grafts were patent without significant stenosis (Fig. 1b). Shortly after the cCTA, the patient was admitted to the hospital, isolated, and diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia. The patient rapidly deteriorated in the hospital, developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and currently is in the intensive care unit (ICU) undergoing treatment.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a CT angiogram demonstrates patchy peripheral predominant ground glass airspace opacity in the dependent lung segment. There was no evidence of pleural effusion, cavitation, or lymphadenopathy. Findings are typical of COVID-19 pneumonia, and should be included in the differential in geographic areas of disease outbreaks. b Coronary artery bypass grafts are patent without significant stenosis

The second patient is a 55-year-old male with no significant past medical history or complaints who presented for cCTA as part of a work-up for an underlying cardiac arrhythmia. The cCTA demonstrated a patchy ground glass opacity within the right lung base (Fig. 2). The patient subsequently became symptomatic with a fever and cough approximately 48 h after the initial scan, and tested positive for COVID-19 on a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Subpleural focal area of ground glass opacification was incidentally identified at the right lung base without consolidation, cavitation, pleural effusion, or lymphadenopathy. The patient was initially asymptomatic, but developed upper respiratory tract symptoms approximately 48 h after the scan and was subsequently diagnosed with COVID-19 by RT-PCR

The third patient is a 40-year-old female who presented with a few days of shortness of breath and dyspnea on exertion with mild associated chest pain. The patient had no significant past medical history and denied any cough or fevers. Due to the concern for exertional chest pain, the patient underwent a cCTA which demonstrated patent coronary arteries and multifocal, peripheral, lower lobe predominant ground glass opacities, typical of reported CT findings of COVID-19 infection (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

ac Multiple bilateral, peripheral, and basilar predominant scattered ground glass opacities are noted. No pleural effusion, consolidation, or lymphadenopathy were detected. d The coronary arteries demonstrate no significant atherosclerotic or stenotic disease

Discussion

COVID-19 was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan City, China, as a lower respiratory tract illness of unknown origin. Since then, the virus has rapidly spread with over four million confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide as of May 17, 2020 [7]. Although China has been the main country affected by the virus, 64 other countries had confirmed cases of COVID-19, including numerous cases in the United States. Presentations of COVID-19 can vary widely, from completely asymptomatic to severe respiratory syndrome and death. The most common reported symptoms at presentation are fever (43.8% on admission, 88.7% during hospitalization), dry cough, fatigue, sputum production, shortness of breath, sore throat, headache, myalgia/arthralgia, chills, nausea/vomiting, nasal congestion, diarrhea, hemoptysis, and conjunctival congestion [8]. Patients infected with the virus typically develop signs and symptoms after a mean incubation period of 5–6 days [911]. However, the utilization of fever and other typical clinical manifestations of COVID-19 infection, particularly in the very early stages of infection, have been associated with high false-negative rates. Thus, the absence of typical clinical features of COVID-19 is insufficient to exclude the diagnosis in the early stages [12].

In this article, we report three cases with COVID-19 found incidentally during coronary CT angiography. Patients were referred by their cardiologists for cCTAs due to suspected coronary heart disease, with no clinical suspicion of pneumonia at the time. This highlights the non-specific presentations of COVID-19 infections and difficulty of making the diagnosis on a clinical basis. The typical findings of COVID-19 infection on CT are bilateral peripheral and basilar predominant ground glass opacities and consolidations with extensive geographic distributions [1317]. Lymphadenopathy and pleural effusions are rare in COVID-19 infections, and are suggestive of an alternative diagnosis. In a study by Pan et al. evaluating the time course of lung changes on CT in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia, early CT findings in patients included no findings (17%), a focal area of ground glass or consolidation (42%), and multilobe opacities (42%), with a peripheral predominance for airspace opacities [15]. The patients in our case series demonstrated similar early CT findings, underlining the importance of including COVID-19 on the differential in at-risk patients with incidentally detected suspicious patterns of airway disease. Furthermore, the typical demographic of patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging are elderly with underlying medical co-morbidities. These patients have shown to be at the highest risk for developing complications related to COVID-19 infection, with increased rates of ICU admissions and mortality [18, 19], stressing the need for early recognition and treatment of COVID-19 in this high-risk demographic.

The detection of incidental extracardiac findings on cCTAs is common and the evaluation and reporting of extracardiac findings should be performed on every myocardial perfusion study [2022]. In a review of the literature discussing the incidental extracardiac findings on cCTA, a total of 13 articles were found including a total of 13,995 patients. Incidental extracardiac findings were detected in 4286 of these patients (30.6%) encompassing a wide array of pathologies, including the diagnosis of lung, adrenal, hepatic, and osseous malignancies (Table 1). In addition, similar rates of extracardiac findings have been reported in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) [34] and myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging [35]. A recent publication by Ai et al. demonstrated chest CT to have a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of COVID-19 than initial RT-PCR tests, suggesting chest CT may be used as a primary method for diagnosis in epidemic areas [36]. This is likely in part due to the reported low sensitivity of the RT-PCR test for COVID-19, ranging around 60–70%, requiring multiple tests to confidently rule out the diagnosis [37]. Thus, knowledge of the typical and early imaging findings of COVID-19 infections is crucial to ensure appropriate early diagnosis.

Table 1.

Incidental extracardiac findings in coronary CT angiographic studies

Authors Year of publication No. of patients No. of findings Incidental extracardiac findings
Christoph l. Lee [23] 2010 151 102 Pulmonary nodule ≥ 4 mm, interstitial lung disease, equivocal liver lesion, lung consolidation, gynecomastia, cholelithiasis, compressed bronchus, marked mediastinal lymphadenopathy, pleural effusion, marked ascites, moderate hiatal hernia, multinodular goiter, pulmonary nodule < 4 mm, calcified granulomata, fissure opacity or atelectasis, benign hepatic cyst, simple renal cyst, small hiatal hernia, pleural calcification, benign adrenal adenoma, pectus deformity, hamartoma in the lung
Jay Koonce [24] 2008 1764 507 Aneurysm, pulmonary embolism, adenopathy, cyst, mass, nodules, pneumonia, interstitial disease, airways disease, atelectasis, emphysema, pleural effusion and plaque, breast mass, thyroid mass, bone metastasis, hepatic cyst, indeterminate liver, liver mass, adrenal mass, miscellaneous findings
Vikram Venkatesh, MD [25] 2010 80 67

Lung/mediastinum: suspicious pulmonary nodule, pulmonary fibrosis, benign nodule/granuloma bulla, pleural plaques atelectasis/scar lymph nodes

Liver: indeterminate lesions, cyst, steatosis

Kidney: indeterminate lesion, cyst, calculi, atrophy

Gallbladder: calculi

Spleen: granuloma

Vascular: anatomic variant, ectatic/atheromatous aorta

Gastrointestinal: hiatus hernia

Adrenal: indeterminate lesion, adenoma

Olga Lazoura, MD [26] 2010 1044 729

Abdominal: hepatic steatosis, liver cyst, liver hemangioma, liver echinococcus cyst, calcified liver granuloma, calcified splenic granuloma, ascites, abdominal aortic aneurysm, liver mass

Thoracic: emphysema, hiatus hernia, calcified lung granuloma, bone hemangioma, calcified lymph nodes, bronchiectasis, remote fracture, substernal thyroid, pulmonary nodule, thoracic adenopathy, pleural effusion, atelectasis, consolidation/GGO, pleural thickening, mediastinal mass lesions, interstitial lung disease, ascending aortic aneurysm, dilated aortic root, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary embolus

Iman Aglan [27] 2009 542 391

Aorta: ascending aortic aneurysm, ascending aortic ectasia, atherosclerosis, atheroma, supradiaphragmal kinking

Pulmonary vessels: pulmonary artery ectasia, supernumerary pulmonary vein (“top roof vein”)

Pleura: effusion, nodular thickening

Lung parenchyma: infiltrate, post-inflammatory changes, atypical pneumonia, intrapulmonary non-specific nodules, calcified/non-calcified granuloma, central bronchial neoplasm, emphysema, dystelectasis

Bronchi: ectasia, wall thickening, indeterminate intraluminal structure

Lymph node: lymphadenopathy, calcification

Liver: steatosis hepatis, non-specific hypodense liver lesion, cyst

Gallbladder: cholecystolithiasis

Spleen: calcification

Miscellaneous: gastric bulging and mucosal hypertrophy, axial hiatal hernia, severe diaphragmatic elevation

Pow-Li chia [28] 2009 1061 103 Liver tumors, cysts, and hemangiomas; hepatic steatosis; pneumobilia; pulmonary nodules; emphysema; interstitial lung disease; histiocytosis; pneumonia, including tuberculosis; pleural effusion; pulmonary edema; aortic aneurysms, pulmonary embolism; ascites; breast cancer; adrenal hyperplasia; lymphoma
Sam J. Lehman [29] 2009 395 205

Lungs: non-calcified pulmonary nodule, calcified pulmonary nodule, pulmonary infiltrate, emphysema, atelectasis, pleural effusion, enlarged hilar or mediastinal lymph node, pneumothorax

Abdomen: liver cyst, contrast-enhancing liver lesion, fatty liver, hiatus hernia, contrast-enhancing splenic lesion, gallstones

Aorta: aneurysm, dissection, penetrating aortic ulcer

Miscellaneous: hemangioma of the spinal column, thyroid mass, chest wall mass, hemangioma

Jin Woo Kim [30] 2009 254 282

Lungs and mediastinum: pulmonary nodule, consolidation/ground glass opacity, interstitial lung disease, emphysema, bronchiectasis, fibrotic scar/air cyst, pleural thickening/calcification, mediastinal mass/lymphadenopathy, pleural effusion

Aorta: aortic aneurysm/dissection

Yoshiyoki Kawano [31] 2007 617 149 Lung, thyroid and hepatic cancer, post-inflammatory lung nodules, hepatic cysts/hemangiomas, benign thyroid tumors, mediastinal lymphadenopathies, benign mammary gland tumors, esophageal submucosal tumor
Jeffrey Mueller [32] 2007 259 51 Pulmonary nodule pneumonia, large mucous plug, pulmonary embolism, aortic ulcer or aneurysm, adrenal mass, moderate pleural effusion, sternal dehiscence, mediastinitis, sarcoidosis, pulmonary hypertension, moderate-sized pneumothorax
Sabine Haller [33] 2006 166 36 Emphysema, hernia, lymphadenopathy, aortic aneurysm, arteria lusoria, bronchiectasis, nerve root cyst, pleural calcification, severe spondylosis, pulmonary fibrosis, bronchial carcinoma, pneumonia, pulmonary emboli, benign pulmonary mass

Conclusion

The interpretation of a coronary CT angiogram should not be limited to the evaluation of coronary arteries. With the growing incidence of COVID-19, radiologists and cardiologists interpreting cCTAs should be aware of the imaging features of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. In epidemic areas, COVID-19 should be included in the differential diagnosis in patients with suspicious imaging features, for which constant vigilance is vital. Although the full-field-of-view reconstructions are not incorporated in CCTA protocols of many imaging centers, they should be routinely reviewed as a part of image interpretation. Multiple prior studies have emphasized the importance of full-field-of-view images in identifying major extracardiac findings [38, 39]. Hence, we strongly recommend the inclusion of full-field-of-view images in CCTA protocols in daily practice, as this may lead to the detection of crucial non-cardiac pathologies. Very high clinical index of suspicion and a very low threshold for clinical and paraclinical screening and diagnostic testing, such as PCR and CT chest, allows earlier recognition, detection, and treatment of this potentially life-threatening and devastating disease and can help ensure appropriate post-exposure precautions are implemented.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bhambhvani P, Dubovsky E, Nath H, Heo J, Ami Iskandrian M. Unusual incidental findings by SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT in the same patient. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17(5):937. doi: 10.1007/s12350-010-9219-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.García-Talavera P, Olmos R, Sainz-Esteban A, Ruiz M, González M, Gamazo C. Evaluation by SPECT-CT of an incidental finding of a thymoma and breast cancer in a myocardial perfusion SPECT with 99mTc-MIBI. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed) 2013;32(4):260–262. doi: 10.1016/j.remn.2012.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Farag AA, Patel H, Bhambhvani P, Hage FG. Incidental detection of abnormal 99m Tc-sestamibi uptake in the sternum and ribcage from multiple myeloma by SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(4):1445–1446. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0625-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ghaedian T, Mortazavi S, Haghighatafshar M. Multiple myeloma and abdominal aortic aneurysm on myocardial perfusion raw images. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40(11):e526–e527. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Husmann L, et al. Prevalence of noncardiac findings on low dose 64-slice computed tomography used for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT. Int J Cardiovasc Iimaging. 2009;25(8):859. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9490-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lindsay AC, Sriharan M, Lazoura O, Sau A, Roughton M, Jabbour RJ, di Mario C, Davies SW, Moat NE, Padley SPG, Rubens MB, Nicol ED. Clinical and economic consequences of non-cardiac incidental findings detected on cardiovascular computed tomography performed prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) Int J Cardiovasc Iimaging. 2015;31(7):1435–1446. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0685-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.WHO (2020) WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. Available: https://covid19.who.int/
  • 8.Guan W-j, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, du B, Li LJ, Zeng G, Yuen KY, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Chen PY, Xiang J, Li SY, Wang JL, Liang ZJ, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Zhong NS, China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19 Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kooraki S, Hosseiny M, Myers L, Gholamrezanezhad A (2020) Coronavirus outbreak: what the Department of Radiology should know. J Am Coll Radiol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Hosseiny M, Kooraki S, Gholamrezanezhad A, Reddy S, Myers L (2020) Radiology perspective of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome. Am J Roentgenol 1–5 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Behzad S, Aghaghazvini L, Radmard AR, Gholamrezanezhad A. Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19: Radiologic and clinical overview [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 18]. Clin Imaging. 2020;66:35–41. 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A (2020) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of imaging findings in 919 patients, (in eng). AJR Am J Roentgenol 1–7 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Kanne JP, Little BP, Chung JH, Elicker BM, Ketai LH (2020) Essentials for radiologists on COVID-19: an update—Radiology Scientific Expert Panel. Radiology 200527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Bernheim A et al (2020) Chest CT Findings in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): relationship to duration of infection, (in eng). Radiology 200463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Pan F et al (2020) Time course of lung changes on chest CT during recovery from 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia, (in eng). Radiology 200370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Hosseiny M, Kooraki S, Gholamrezanezhad A, Reddy S, Myers L. Radiology perspective of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): lessons from severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome. Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214(5):1078–1082. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kooraki S, Hosseiny M, Myers L, Gholamrezanezhad A (2020) Coronavirus outbreak: what the Department of Radiology should know. J Am Coll Radiol 447–451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Yang X et al Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.Wang D et al (2020) Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Assadi M, Velez E, Najafi MH, Gholamrezanezhad A. The need for standardization of nuclear cardiology reporting and data system (NCAD-RADS): learning from coronary artery disease (CAD), breast imaging (BI), liver imaging (LI), and prostate imaging (PI) RADS, (in eng) J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26(2):660–665. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-01473-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gholamrezanezhad A, Mirpour S. An important but easily forgettable review: extracardiac activity in myocardial perfusion scans. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007;23(2):207–208. doi: 10.1007/s10554-006-9137-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee CI, Tsai EB, Sigal BM, Plevritis SK, Garber AM, Rubin GD. Incidental extracardiac findings at coronary CT: clinical and economic impact, (in eng) AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6):1531–1538. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee CI, Tsai EB, Sigal BM, Plevritis SK, Garber AM, Rubin GD. Incidental extracardiac findings at coronary CT: clinical and economic impact. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6):1531–1538. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Koonce J, Schoepf JU, Nguyen SA, Northam MC, Ravenel JG. Extra-cardiac findings at cardiac CT: experience with 1,764 patients. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(3):570–576. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1195-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Venkatesh V, You JJ, Landry DJ, Ellins ML, Sheth T. Extracardiac findings in cardiac computed tomographic angiography in patients at low to intermediate risk for coronary artery disease. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2010;61(5):286–290. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lazoura O, Vassiou K, Kanavou T, Vlychou M, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis IV. Incidental non-cardiac findings of a coronary angiography with a 128-slice multi-detector CT scanner: should we only concentrate on the heart? Korean J Radiol. 2010;11(1):60–68. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.1.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aglan I, Jodocy D, Hiehs S, Soegner P, Frank R, Haberfellner B, Klauser A, Jaschke W, Feuchtner GM. Clinical relevance and scope of accidental extracoronary findings in coronary computed tomography angiography: a cardiac versus thoracic FOV study. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74(1):166–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chia P-L, Kaw G, Wansaicheong G, Ho K-T. Prevalence of non-cardiac findings in a large series of patients undergoing cardiac multi-detector computed tomography scans. Int J Cardiovasc Iimaging. 2009;25(5):537–543. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9455-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lehman SJ, Abbara S, Cury RC, Nagurney JT, Hsu J, Goela A, Schlett CL, Dodd JD, Brady TJ, Bamberg F, Hoffmann U. Significance of cardiac computed tomography incidental findings in acute chest pain. Am J Med. 2009;122(6):543–549. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim JW, et al. Incidental extracardiac findings at cardiac CT angiography: comparison of prevalence and clinical significance between precontrast low-dose whole thoracic scan and postcontrast retrospective ECG-gated cardiac scan. Int J Cardiovasc Iimaging. 2009;25(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10554-008-9417-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kawano Y, Tamura A, Goto Y, Shinozaki K, Zaizen H, Kadota J. Incidental detection of cancers and other non-cardiac abnormalities on coronary multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(11):1608–1609. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mueller J, Jeudy J, Poston R, White CS. Cardiac CT angiography after coronary bypass surgery: prevalence of incidental findings. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(2):414–419. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Haller S, Kaiser C, Buser P, Bongartz G, Bremerich J. Coronary artery imaging with contrast-enhanced MDCT: extracardiac findings. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(1):105–110. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gravina M et al (2017) Incidental extracardiac findings and their characterization on cardiac MRI. Biomed Res Int 2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Gholamrezanezhad A, Moinian D, Eftekhari M, Mirpour S, Hajimohammadi H. The prevalence and significance of increased gastric wall radiotracer uptake in sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT. Int J Cardiovasc Iimaging. 2006;22(3-4):435–441. doi: 10.1007/s10554-005-9055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li YC, Bai WZ, Hashikawa T (2020) The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2 may be at least partially responsible for the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Fang Y et al (2020) Sensitivity of chest CT for COVID-19: comparison to RT-PCR, (in eng). Radiology 200432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Kim TJ, Han DH, Jin KN, Lee KW (2010) Lung cancer detected at cardiac CT: prevalence, clinicoradiologic features, and importance of full-field-of-view images. Radiology 255 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 39.Northam M, Koonce J, Ravenel JG. Pulmonary nodules detected at cardiac CT: comparison of images in limited and full fields of view. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(3):878–881. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emergency Radiology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES