Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 May 25;92(10):2181–2187. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26026

Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes of patients coinfected with COVID‐19 and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the USA

Vijay Gayam 1, Venu M Konala 2, Srikanth Naramala 3,, Pavani Reddy Garlapati 1, Mohamed A Merghani 1, Nirajan Regmi 4, Mamtha Balla 5, Sreedhar Adapa 6
PMCID: PMC7280653  PMID: 32449972

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is spreading at a rapid pace, and the World Health Organization declared it as pandemic on 11 March 2020. Mycoplasma pneumoniae is an "atypical" bacterial pathogen commonly known to cause respiratory illness in humans. The coinfection from SARS‐CoV‐2 and mycoplasma pneumonia is rarely reported in the literature to the best of our knowledge. We present a study in which 6 of 350 patients confirmed with COVID‐19 were also diagnosed with M. pneumoniae infection. In this study, we described the clinical characteristics of patients with coinfection. Common symptoms at the onset of illness included fever (six [100%] patients); five (83.3%) patients had a cough, shortness of breath, and fatigue. The other symptoms were myalgia (66.6%), gastrointestinal symptoms (33.3%‐50%), and altered mental status (16.7%). The laboratory parameters include lymphopenia, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C‐reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, interleukin‐6, serum ferritin, and D‐dimer in all six (100%) patients. The chest X‐ray at presentation showed bilateral infiltrates in all the patients (100%). We also described electrocardiogram findings, complications, and treatment during hospitalization in detail. One patient died during the hospital course.

Keywords: coronavirus, epidemiology, immune responses, interleukin, pandemics, pathogenesis, respiratory tract, SARS coronavirus, virus classification

Highlights

The COVID‐19 pneumonia is a serious condition and can be associated with the common respiratory pathogens. Co‐infections with COVID‐19 can result in protracted respiratory symptoms, prolonged ICU stay, morbidity, and mortality if not detected and treated appropriately. The treatment of Co‐infection if y available might facilitate early recovery.

1. INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has infected more than 2.4 million people and resulted in more than 170 000 deaths worldwide caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). 1 COVID‐19 was declared as a global pandemic by the World Health Organization. 2 COVID‐19 can be associated with other organisms causing pneumonia. The symptoms caused by COVID‐19 are like the other common respiratory pathogens, and it is essential to identify them and treat them appropriately. Patients who have COVID‐19 can also get rarely coinfected with other respiratory pathogens. Coinfection of both COVID‐19 and influenza has been described. 3 , 4

Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia is commonly seen in younger adults and is the common reason for atypical pneumonia. 5 The coinfection from SARS‐CoV‐2 and mycoplasma pneumonia is rarely reported in the literature. 6 , 7 The goal of this study is to provide a detailed description of the clinical characteristics, relevant laboratory associations, treatments, and complications in such coinfection that have never been described before.

2. METHODS

2.1. Patients

The present study is a retrospective cohort review of all consecutive COVID‐19 patients who were admitted to a community teaching hospital between 1 March and 15 April 2020. The institutional review board of Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, approved the study protocol with patient consent exemption. The patients who were coinfected both with COVID‐19 and M. pneumoniae were a total of 6 among 350 patients.

2.2. Data collection

Subject data were extracted from electronic medical records, and the data was deidentified for analysis. The following data was collected—patient's demographic information, pertinent clinical data including medical comorbidities, laboratory data, chest X‐ray, electrocardiogram (EKG). The mycoplasma diagnosis was made based on the serologies (enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay), and COVID‐19 diagnosis was made based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

2.3. Outcome assessment

We are discussing the patient's clinical characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and clinical outcomes of patients presenting with COVID‐19 and M. pneumonia.

2.4. Statistical analysis

The statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) software (IBM SPSS, version 25) was used for statistical analysis was performed using. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize categorical and continuous variables. The descriptive values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Clinical characteristics

Our study found that 6 patients were coinfected with COVID‐19 and mycoplasma among 350 patients infected with COVID‐19, with an incidence rate of 1.7%. Among the 350 patients, 30 patients (8.5%) were Hispanics, 10 (2.8%) were Caucasians, 5 (1.5%) were Asians (1.5%), and 305 (87.1%) were African‐Americans. The clinical characteristics of the coinfected patients were listed in Table 1. The age range of these patients was from 39 to 68 years (mean age ± SD = 57 ± 10.6 years). Among the six patients, four were females and two were males. All the patients were African‐Americans except for one Hispanic female. Among the comorbidities, hypertension was present in the majority (five patients—83.3%) and congestive heart failure in half (three patients—50%) of the patients. One‐third (two patients—33.3%) of the patients had diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and bronchial asthma. Only one patient (16.7%) had a history of malignancy and one patient with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD). The body mass index ranged from 22.6 to 40.7 (mean ± SD = 28 ± 6.5). One‐third of the patients (two patients—33.3%) are active smokers, and one patient (16.7%) has a history of alcohol intake. Only one patient was taking Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors on admission. The majority of the patients had hypertension, five of them were African‐Americans and one of them was morbidly obese.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of patients infected with COVID‐19 and Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Characteristics Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 N (%)
Age 39 54 68 60 67 54 NA
Sex Female Female Male Female Female Male NA
Body mass index 26.8 23.5 22.6 28.3 40.7 26 NA
Ethnicity
African‐American Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Yes 83.3
Hispanic NA NA NA NA Yes NA 16.7
Comorbidities
Hypertension No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 83.3
Diabetes No Yes No No No Yes 33.3
Congestive heart failure No Yes Yes No Yes No 50
Bronchial asthma No No Yes No No Yes 33.3
Current smoker Yes No Yes No No No 33.3
Coronary artery disease No No No No Yes No 16.7
Alcohol use Yes No No No No No 16.7
Hyperlipidemia No No Yes No Yes No 33.3
End‐stage renal disease No No No No No Yes 16.7
H/o of malignancy No No No No Yes No 16.7
Clinical presentation
Cough Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 83.3
Myalgia Yes No Yes Yes No Yes 66.6
Fever Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 100
Shortness of breath Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No 83.3
Nausea Yes Yes No Yes No No 50
Vomiting Yes No No Yes No No 33.3
Diarrhea No Yes No Yes No No 33.3
Fatigue Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes 83.3
Altered mental status No No No No Yes No 16.7
Length of stay, d 9 8 11 10 5 5

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

All the patients had a fever (100%). Cough, shortness of breath, and fatigue were present in the majority (five patients—83.3%). Two‐thirds (four patients—66.6%) had myalgias, half of them (three patients—50%) had nausea, and one‐third (two patients—33.3%) had diarrhea and vomiting. Only one patient (16.7%) had altered mental status. The length of the stay ranged from 5 to 11 days, and one patient expired on the fifth day of admission.

3.2. Vital signs, EKG, and chest X‐ray at presentation

The vital signs, EKG, and chest X‐ray at presentation were summarized in Table 2. The temperature ranged from 99.8°F to 103.1°F. The respiratory rate ranged from 18 to 22 breaths per minute. 83.3% of the patients were hypoxic, with one patient needing mechanical ventilation, one patient needing nonrebreather, and three patients needing oxygen delivery by nasal cannula, and two among them needed high flow.

Table 2.

Vital signs, electrocardiogram (EKG), and chest X‐ray at presentation 

Vital Signs Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6
Temperature, °F 102 101.5 99.8 100.9 102 103.1
Respiratory rate 18 20 22 20 22 18
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 108 135 133 138 105 91
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 75 73 82 70 59 53
Oxygen saturation 95 95 96 95 100 95
Oxygen delivery method Room air Nasal cannula High‐flow nasal cannula High‐flow nasal cannula Mechanical ventilation Nonrebreather
Chest X‐ray
Unilateral infiltrate No No No No No No
Bilateral infiltrate Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
EKG
PR interval, ms (120‐200) 146 150 154 158 174 162
QTc interval, ms (males, 431‐450; females, 451‐470) 401 510 430 474 500 455
New ST‐T wave changes No No No No No No

Bilateral infiltrates were present in all the patients on a chest X‐ray at presentation (100%), as shown in Figure 1. Two patients (33.3%) has prolonged QT interval on EKG (QTc males 431‐450; females 451‐470). There were no new ST‐T segment changes in any of these patients.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chest X‐rays of all the patients showing bilateral lung infiltrates

3.3. Laboratory parameters for all the patients

The laboratory parameters for all the patients were summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Laboratory parameters for all the patients

Parameters Reference range Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 N (%) abnormal
White cell count 4.5‐11 (103/µL) 4.2 3.7 5.6 6.2 13.4 12.9 33.3
Hemoglobin Female: 11‐15 g/dL; male: 13‐17 g/dL 13.6 12.1 13.6 12.5 12 9.8 16.6
Platelet count 130‐400 (103/µL) 161 271 141 249 140 228 0
Lymphocytes 22‐48 (%) 6.4 16 8.5 6.5 3.5 4.5 100
Neutrophils 40‐70 (%) 75.6 57.9 75 88 90 91.3 83.3
ESR 0‐20 mm/h 53 103 65 102 39 120 100
CRP 0‐10 mg/L 108 46 56 144 146 114 100
LDH 125‐220 U/L 500 778 345 390 1408 474 100
Troponin I 0.00‐0.03 ng/mL 0.06 0.09 0.4 0.01 2.21 0.1 83.3
BNP 10‐100 pg/mL 41 265 1335 10 567 35 50
IL‐6 0.0‐15.5 pg/mL 300 54.6 245 346 74.5 200 100
Serum ferritin 30‐400 ng/mL 1200 810 1535 469 2920 3052 100
d‐dimer 0‐500 ng/mL 1095 2032 4625 1445 3862 1592 100
Fibrinogen 193‐507 mg/dL 542 660 546 650 567 368 83.3
PCT 0.5‐1.9 mmol/L 0.57 0.37 0.65 0.12 2.37 2.2 33.3
AST 5‐34 U/L 37 29 44 35 229 20 66.6
ALT 10‐55 U/L 26 12 16 27 106 20 16.7
Lactic acid 0.5‐1.9 mmol/L 2.1 1.5 1.8 1.2 3.5 0.9 33.3
BUN 9.8‐20.1 mg/dL 6.7 39.7 38.5 10.9 40.7 74.8 66.6
Creatinine 0.57‐1.11 mg/dL 0.79 2.02 1.51 0.75 1.85 1.24 66.6
SARS‐COV‐2 PCR Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive NA
Influenza Type A Ag/Ab; type b Ag/Ab PCR Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative NA
Urine legionella Ag Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative NA
Mycoplasma pneumonia IgM <770 U/mL 1261 1075 1389 1167 1737 909 NA
Mycoplasma pneumonia IgG <100 U/mL 816 955 725 707 806 657 NA

Abbreviations: Ab, antibody; Ag, antigen; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CRP, C‐reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; IL‐6, interleukin‐6, LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; NA, not applicable; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PCT, procalcitonin; SARS‐COV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2.

White cell count was elevated in two patients (33.3%), while all the patients had lymphopenia, and neutrophils were elevated in the majority of the patients (five patients—83.3%). All the patients had a normal platelet count. Out of six patients, only one patient had anemia of chronic disease due to a history of ESRD at admission (16.6%). As there was no drop in hemoglobin/hematocrit for all the patients during the entire hospital course, cold agglutinin test was not performed. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) serum ferritin, and D‐dimer was elevated in all the patients.

Troponin levels were elevated in the majority (five patients—83.3%), ranged from 0.01 to peak level of 2.21 ng/mL. Brain natriuretic peptide was elevated in half (three patients—50%) of the patients, ranged from 10 to 1335 pg/mL. The fibrinogen level was elevated in the majority (five patients—83.3%) and ranged from 368 to 660 mg/dL. The procalcitonin levels ranged from 0.12 to 2.37 mmol/L, which were elevated in a third of patients (two patients—33.3%). The lactic acid was elevated in one‐third of patients (two patients 33.3%) and ranged from 0.9 to 3.5 mmol/L. The aspartate aminotransferase was elevated in four patients (66.6%), while alanine aminotransferase was elevated in only one patient (16.6%). The blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine were elevated in two‐thirds of the patients (four patients—66.6%). The peak BUN level was 74.8 mg/dL, and peak creatinine level was 2.02 mg/dL. Potassium and magnesium levels were normal in all the patients. Prothrombin time/activated partial thromboplastin time were within normal limits.

All the patients were tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by PCR. M. pneumoniae immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) were elevated in all the patients ranged from 909 to 1737 U/mL and 657 to 955 U/mL, respectively. All the patients were tested negative for both influenza A and B by PCR and urine Legionella Pneumophila antigen. Sputum, urine, and blood cultures were negative for all patients.

3.4. In‐hospital complications

The complications that occurred during the hospital course were summarized in Table 4. Only one patient (16.7%) required intensive care unit (ICU) stay and developed acute respiratory distress syndrome needing mechanical ventilation, developed shock needing vasopressor support, eventually leading to multiorgan failure and death. The acute cardiac injury was present in the majority (five patients—83.3%), and two‐thirds (four patients—66.6%) developed acute kidney injury.

Table 4.

Complications of the patients

Complications Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 N (%) Y
ARDS No No No No Yes No 16.7
Shock No No No No Yes No 16.7
Acute cardiac injury Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes 83.3
Acute liver failure No No No No Yes No 16.7
Acute kidney injury No Yes Yes No Yes Yes 66.6
Mechanical ventilation No No No No Yes No 16.7
Death No No No No Yes No 16.7
ICU stay No No No No Yes No 16.7

Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ICU, intensive care unit.

The medications used for the treatment of patients were listed in Table 5. All the patients received ceftriaxone for pneumonia, zinc, and vitamin C. About half of them (three patients—50%) received azithromycin or doxycycline with no overlap. Hydroxychloroquine was given to two patients (33.3%), and steroids were given to two patients (33.3%). The patient who died was treated with ceftriaxone, azithromycin, and steroids, but did not receive hydroxychloroquine.

Table 5.

List of medications

Medications Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 N (%) Y
Ceftriaxone Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 100
Azithromycin Yes No Yes No No Yes 50
Doxycycline No Yes No Yes Yes No 50
Hydroxychloroquine No No Yes Yes No No 33.3
Steroids No No No No Yes Yes 33.3
Vitamin C Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 100
Zinc Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 100

4. DISCUSSION

The novel coronavirus SARS‐Cov‐2 causes fever, cough, and shortness of breath and is spreading at an unrelenting pace daily. The United States has the highest number of patients infected, and mortality than any other country in the world. 1 SARS‐CoV‐2 has spike (S) protein that utilizes membrane‐bound angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 aided by serine proteases to gain entry into the human cell and cause infection. 8

SARS‐CoV‐2 can circulate in the environment with other microorganisms and can change with disease patterns. 9 The influenza epidemic in Wuhan, China, was interfered with by COVID‐19 emergence. 9 In a study analyzing two centers in China, the coinfection pattern differed significantly, and a large proportion of patients in Quindao had other seasonal respiratory pathogens in patients with COVID‐19 compared to Wuhan. The coinfection rate was 23.3% with mycoplasma pneumonia and COVID‐19 in Quindao, China. 10 SARS‐CoV is another zoonotic beta coronavirus that has close genetic homology with SARS‐CoV‐2. Mycoplasma coinfection with SARS‐CoV has been detected on the serological assay but was not detected on the respiratory specimen PCR, thus limiting the incidence of coinfection. 11

Mycoplasma pneumonia is one of the important causes of respiratory tract infections in adults and children and confers 4% to 8% of community‐acquired bacterial pneumonia. 5 The number of cases can increase in epidemics and close clusters. 12 The infection can range in severity from mild to life‐threatening. An annual estimation of 2 million cases results from this infection leading to 100 000 hospitalizations of adults in the United States. 5 The infections tend to be more common in summers but can occur in any climate. 5 The symptoms of COVID‐19 and M. pneumoniae pneumonia are similar with fever, cough, and shortness of breath.

All the patients in this study had both COVID‐19 PCR and mycoplasma serologies positive. All the inflammatory markers were elevated, including IL‐6, CRP, ESR, and serum ferritin, LDH, D‐dimer that have been consistent with prior reported COVID‐19. 13 , 14 All the patients had lymphopenia, which is typical of viral infections. 13 Most of the patients had elevated troponin I levels, which signifies acute cardiac injury. Bilateral infiltrates were present in all the patients on a chest X‐ray at presentation.

Fan et al reported a case of a 36‐year‐old male in Singapore who had coinfection with mycoplasma and COVID‐19. The patient had severe lymphopenia, and moderate thrombocytopenia needed ICU admission and ventilator support. The patient also had cold agglutinin titer of 1:8 and mycoplasma pneumonia antibody titer of 1:160, no hemolysis, or significant anemia was noted, and the direct agglutinin test was negative. 6 Xu et al 7 discussed a 49‐year‐old female patient who had coinfection SARS‐COV‐2 and mycoplasma. The patient presented with productive cough and chest congestion but no fever. Computed tomography of the chest showed bilateral ground‐glass opacities in lower lobes and patchy shadows in the right upper lobe. The patient test positive for COVID‐19 and mycoplasma and was treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, peramivir, interferon‐α2b (anti‐virals) as well as cefonicid sodium, azithromycin, and moxifloxacin (antibiotics). The patient fully recovered and was discharged from the hospital.

The diagnostic method of choice for mycoplasma pneumonia is nucleic acid amplification tests like PCR and multiplex assays because they have high sensitivity and specificity compared to serologies and culture. 15 , 16 , 17 Serological tests can be used when molecular tests are not available or as an adjunct to the molecular tests. 18 A single high IgM titer or a fourfold rise in IgG titers are used for serological diagnosis as in our patients. 19

There is no effective proven therapy for COVID‐19 as of now, and supportive care is a vital aspect of care. Many treatment strategies have been utilized like hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, azithromycin, lopinavir/ritonavir, and tocilizumab. 13 , 20 The first‐line therapies for M. pneumoniae are macrolides, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones. 21 , 22 , 23 Fortunately, the majority of the patients responded well to the treatment and were discharged from the hospital.

5. CONCLUSION

The COVID‐19 pneumonia is a serious condition and can be associated with the common respiratory pathogens. This can be dangerous and can result in protracted respiratory symptoms, prolonged ICU stay, morbidity, and mortality if not detected and treated appropriately. The physicians should screen for the common respiratory pathogens with appropriate diagnostic tests.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

VG, PRG, MAM, and NR were involved in data collection, review, and preparation of the manuscript. VMK, MB, SN, and SA were involved in the analysis of data and final review of the manuscript, the preparation of tables. All the authors reviewed the manuscript and agreed with the findings and interpretation.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The institutional review board of Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, approved the study protocol with patient consent exemption.

Gayam V, Konala VM, Naramala S, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes of patients coinfected with COVID‐19 and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the USA. J Med Virol. 2020;92:2181–2187. 10.1002/jmv.26026

REFERENCES

  • 1.John Hopkins University in medicine coronavirus resource center. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed 20 April 2020.
  • 2.World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who‐director‐general‐s‐opening‐remarks‐at‐the‐media‐briefing‐on‐covid‐19‐‐‐11‐march‐2020. Accessed 20 April 2020.
  • 3. Ding Q, Lu P, Fan Y, Xia Y, Liu M. The clinical characteristics of pneumonia patients co‐infected with 2019 novel coronavirus and influenza virus in Wuhan, China. J Med Virol. 2020;1–7. 10.1002/jmv.25781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Konala VM, Adapa S, Gayam V, et al. Co‐infection with influenza A and COVID‐19. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2020;7(5):001656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Waites KB, Xiao L, Liu Y, Balish MF, Atkinson TP. Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the respiratory tract and beyond. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30(3):747‐809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fan BE, Lim KG, Chong VC, Chan SS, Ong KH, Kuperan P. COVID‐19 and Mycoplasma pneumoniae coinfection. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:723‐724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Xu Y, Gao Z, Gao L, Chen X. A 49‐year‐old woman co‐infected with SARS‐COV‐2 and mycoplasma—a case report. Res Square. 2020. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-16376/v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, et al. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature. 2003;426(6965):450‐454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zhou X, Ding G, Shu T, et al. The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 interfered with influenza in Wuhan. Lancet. 2020. 10.2139/ssrn.3555239 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Xing Q, Li GJ, Xing YH, et al. Precautions are needed for COVID‐19 patients with coinfection of common respiratory pathogens. medRxiv. 2020. 10.2139/ssrn.3550013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zahariadis G, Gooley TA, Ryall P, et al. Risk of ruling out severe acute respiratory syndrome by ruling in another diagnosis: variable incidence of atypical bacteria coinfection based on diagnostic assays. Can Respir J. 2006;13(1):17‐22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Jacobs E, Ehrhardt I, Dumke R. New insights in the outbreak pattern of Mycoplasma pneumoniae . Int J Med Microbiol. 2015;305(7):705‐708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Balla M, Merugu GP, Patel M, et al. COVID‐19, modern pandemic: a systematic review from a front‐line health care providers’ perspective. J Clin Med Res. 2020;12(4):215‐229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gao Y, Li T, Han M, et al. Diagnostic utility of clinical laboratory data determinations for patients with the severe COVID‐19. J Med Virol. 2020;1–6. 10.1002/jmv.25770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ito Y, Iwashima S, Hayano S, et al. Rapid detection of the macrolide sensitivity of pneumonia‐causing Mycoplasma pneumoniae using quenching probe polymerase chain reaction (GENECUBE®). Mol Diagn Ther. 2018;22(6):737‐747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Robert S, Lhommet C, Le Brun C, et al. Diagnostic performance of multiplex PCR on pulmonary samples versus nasopharyngeal aspirates in community‐acquired severe lower respiratory tract infections. J Clin Virol. 2018;108:1‐5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Poritz MA, Blaschke AJ, Byington CL, et al. FilmArray, an automated nested multiplex PCR system for multi‐pathogen detection: development and application to respiratory tract infection. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang L, Zong ZY, Liu YB, Ye H, Lv XJ. PCR versus serology for diagnosing Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: a systematic review & meta‐analysis. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134(3):270‐280. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Daxboeck F, Krause R, Wenisch C. Laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9(4):263‐273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Luo P, Liu Y, Qiu L, Liu X, Liu D, Li J. Tocilizumab treatment in COVID‐19: a single center experience. J Med Virol. 2020;1–5. 10.1002/jmv.25801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Pereyre S, Guyot C, Renaudin H, Charron A, Bebear C, Bebear CM. In vitro selection and characterization of resistance to macrolides and related antibiotics in Mycoplasma pneumoniae . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(2):460‐465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kawai Y, Miyashita N, Kubo M, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of macrolides, minocycline, and tosufloxacin against macrolide‐resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(5):2252‐2258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. File TM, Segreti J, Dunbar L, et al. A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community‐acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41(9):1965‐1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Virology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES