Abstract
Inherited prion diseases are caused by autosomal dominant coding mutations in the human prion protein (PrP) gene (PRNP) and account for about 15% of human prion disease cases worldwide. The proposed mechanism is that the mutation predisposes to conformational change in the expressed protein, leading to the generation of disease-related multichain PrP assemblies that propagate by seeded protein misfolding. Despite considerable experimental support for this hypothesis, to-date spontaneous formation of disease-relevant, transmissible PrP assemblies in transgenic models expressing only mutant human PrP has not been demonstrated. Here, we report findings from transgenic mice that express human PrP 117V on a mouse PrP null background (117VV Tg30 mice), which model the PRNP A117V mutation causing inherited prion disease (IPD) including Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker (GSS) disease phenotypes in humans. By studying brain samples from uninoculated groups of mice, we discovered that some mice (≥475 days old) spontaneously generated abnormal PrP assemblies, which after inoculation into further groups of 117VV Tg30 mice, produced a molecular and neuropathological phenotype congruent with that seen after transmission of brain isolates from IPD A117V patients to the same mice. To the best of our knowledge, the 117VV Tg30 mouse line is the first transgenic model expressing only mutant human PrP to show spontaneous generation of transmissible PrP assemblies that directly mirror those generated in an inherited prion disease in humans.
Transgenic mice expressing the human prion protein containing a mutation linked to the inherited prion disease Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease develop spontaneous neuropathology. This represents the first human prion protein transgenic model to show spontaneous generation of transmissible prion assemblies that directly mirror those generated in humans.
Introduction
Prions are lethal infectious agents that cause fatal neurodegenerative diseases in mammals, including Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in humans, scrapie in sheep and goats, and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle [1–3]. They are unique pathogens and are composed of infectious assemblies of misfolded host-encoded prion protein (PrP), some of which acquire protease-resistance and are classically designated as PrPSc [1,2]. Prions propagate by means of seeded protein polymerization, a process that involves the addition of PrP monomers to an elongating assembly of misfolded PrP chains followed by fission of the polymer to produce more seeds. Different prion strains producing distinct disease phenotypes can propagate in the same inbred host and appear to be encoded by distinct PrP conformations and assembly states [1,2,4–9].
Human prion diseases are associated with a range of clinical presentations, and they are classified by both clinicopathological syndrome and aetiology, with subclassification according to molecular criteria [3,6,10–14]. Approximately 15% of cases are associated with autosomal dominant pathogenic mutations in the human prion protein gene (PRNP), and, to date, more than 40 mutations have been described [13,15–17]. These include insertions of between 4 and 12 extra repeats within the octapeptide repeat region between codons 51 and 91, a 2-octapeptide repeat deletion and various other mutations causing missense or stop substitutions or other insertions with and without a frameshift. How pathogenic mutations in PRNP cause inherited prion disease (IPD) has yet to be resolved; however, in most cases, the mutation is thought to lead to spontaneous conformational change in the expressed protein, leading to the generation of disease-related PrP assemblies that propagate by seeded protein misfolding. Although a wealth of data from acquired or sporadic CJD indicates that residue 129 polymorphism of human PrP critically dictates thermodynamic preferences for PrP assemblies associated with distinct human prion strains [2,9,11,15,18–20], the full spectrum of effects that different pathogenic PRNP mutations have remains unclear. Notably a common feature of PRNP point mutations associated with conspicuous amyloid PrP plaque deposition in brain is that the expressed full-length mutant PrP forms 2 distinct disease-related assemblies of misfolded PrP. One assembly forms N-terminally truncated protease-resistant fragments that correspond to those generated from classical PrPSc (PrP 27–30 [1]), which is enriched in brain areas showing synaptic PrP deposition, spongiform vacuolation, and neurodegeneration. The other disease-associated assembly forms smaller N- and C-terminally truncated protease-resistant fragments (typically 7–15 kDa, derived from the central region of PrP), which is associated with PrP amyloid plaques [21–32]. Such distinct disease-associated PrP assembly states from Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker (GSS) patients with the P102L PrP mutation transmit different phenotypes to experimental reporter mice resulting in either a lethal transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (associated with transmission of classical PrPSc) or a clinically silent PrP amyloidosis (associated with the transmission of the PrP conformer generating an approximately 8 kDa, protease-resistant PrP fragment) [33–35]. Recently we proposed that authentic prions responsible for lethal transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are comprised of infectious paired fibre PrP rods (20 nm in width, generating proteolytic fragments corresponding to PrP 27–30) [36] and that in IPD patient brain distinct single PrP fibres (approximately 10 nm in width that generate N- and C-terminally truncated protease-resistant fragments) may co-propagate and account for the abundant amyloid PrP plaques that distinguish the IPD neuropathological phenotype [37,38]. Temporal and spatial differences in the propagation of paired fibre PrP rods or single amyloid PrP fibres within the brain could readily account for the diversity of clinicopathological phenotypes seen in family members with the same PRNP mutation [39–42].
Potential co-propagation of infectious, pathogenic, paired fibre PrP rods and distinct single amyloid PrP fibres in IPD patient brain places considerable constraints on the ability to accurately model these diseases in laboratory mice. Variation in the substructure of infectious PrP rods or the single amyloid PrP fibres in different IPDs (governed by the specific PrP missense mutation) may dictate their strain-specific biological properties and host range via conformational selection [2,9,18,43]. In particular, the intrinsic ability of a particular mutant PrP assembly (paired fibre PrP rod or single amyloid PrP fibre) to propagate at all may critically rely upon expression of the homotypic mutant PrP sequence. To date, however, much of the modelling of pathogenic mutations seen in IPD has involved the superimposition of the human PrP mutation onto rodent PrP [44–54] or bovine PrP sequences [55,56]. However, biophysical studies of an experimental mutation introduced into the mouse or human PrP sequence have shown profoundly dissimilar structural consequences for the expressed protein [57,58]. Indeed, recent modelling of the IPD PRNP P102L mutation using mice expressing the authentic mutant human PrP sequence strongly suggests that the presence of this mutation within the mouse PrP sequence leads to the generation of a novel experimental prion strain following challenge with human prions that is markedly different from the prion strain propagated in human disease [43].
Currently there has been no report of spontaneous neurological dysfunction in mice expressing IPD mutations directly in human PrP. In this regard, transgenic mice expressing human 102L PrP at 1.5- to 3-fold, human 200K PrP at 2- to 3-fold [59] or human 224V PrP at 1.5- to 3.2-fold [60] do not develop spontaneous disease or evidence for spontaneous generation of prions as they age. Recently, we demonstrated that IPD A117V (associated with GSS phenotypes in humans characterised by abundant PrP plaque deposition in brain [16,30,61]) is an authentic, transmissible, prion disease by demonstrating that inoculation of A117V patient brain to transgenic mice expressing mutant human PrP 117V (117VV Tg30 and Tg31 mice) not only results in transmission of abundant PrP amyloid plaque pathology in brain (associated with a characteristic disease-related PrP assembly generating an approximately 8 kDa protease-resistant PrP fragment analogous to that detected in A117V patient brain [27,31,32]) but also results in propagation of classical PrPSc assemblies (generating proteolytic fragments corresponding to PrP 27–30), which are pathognomonic of prion disease [30]. This classical PrPSc in 117VV transgenic mouse brain is, however, extremely labile in comparison to classical PrPSc generated in transgenic mouse models of P102L or E200K [30,59], and such intrinsic instability may explain why classical PrPSc signatures in A117V patient brain have not been detected.
Notably, as part of these studies, we observed occasional PrP plaques in the brain of uninoculated old-aged 117VV Tg30 mice. Here, we now demonstrate that these pathological changes are associated with spontaneous production of disease-related PrP assemblies having molecular and phenotypic transmission properties that mirror those generated in IPD A117V patient brain.
Results
Age-dependent spontaneous formation of abnormal PrP deposits in the brain of aged 117VV Tg30 mice
Transgenic mice homozygous for human PrP 117V (117VV Tg30 mice and 117VV Tg31 mice) are fully susceptible to infection with disease-related PrP assemblies that propagate in the brain of patients with IPD A117V [30]. As part of these studies, we monitored a cohort of 20 uninoculated 117VV Tg30 mice over their lifespan in order to see whether the expression of mutant 117V human PrP might lead to age-dependent development of spontaneous disease. Three mice from this cohort showed symptomatic neurological signs and were culled at ages of 476, 600, and 742 days [30]. Brains from these mice and from other mice in the group (that were culled either because of old age or the occurrence of nonneurological intercurrent illness) were divided sagittally with one half fixed for neuropathological examination and PrP immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the other frozen. We found that the mouse culled with neurological disease at 476 days old (designated 117VSpont-A) and another mouse without neurological dysfunction culled at 734 days old (designated 117VSpont-B) had immuno-reactive PrP plaques that were localised to the anterior commissure of the brain (Fig 1Ai and 1Aii, respectively). All other brains examined from this cohort of aged 117VV Tg30 mice were devoid of neuropathological changes or abnormal PrP deposition. This restricted pattern of spontaneous PrP deposition, seen in only a proportion of aged 117VV Tg30 mice, differed markedly from the uniform and widespread pattern of PrP deposition seen in all 117VV Tg30 mice following challenge with A117V IPD patient brain [30].
Subsequently, we examined 10% (w/v) homogenate prepared from the frozen, contralateral side of brain from the 117VSpont-A and 117VSpont-B mice for the presence of abnormal PrP using high-sensitivity immunoblotting. Using standard procedures [62], no proteinase K (PK)-resistant PrP could be detected; however, using sodium phosphotungstic acid (NaPTA) precipitation to isolate disease-related PrP aggregates from a larger volume of brain homogenate [7,62,63], we found that both 117VSpont-A and 117VSpont-B mouse brains contained aggregates of insoluble 117V PrP (Fig 1B lanes 2 and 4), although this material was not resistant to digestion with PK using standard conditions (Fig 1B lanes 1 and 3). Importantly, the ability to precipitate PrP with NaPTA appeared to be specific to the 117VSpont-A and 117VSpont-B mouse brains that harboured the spontaneous PrP plaques because we could not detect insoluble PrP following similar analyses of much larger volumes of comparably age-matched 117VV Tg30 brain that were devoid of detectable PrP plaques when examined by IHC (Fig 1B lanes 5 and 6).
Based upon these findings, we initiated 2 experiments. Firstly, we inoculated 117VSpont-A and 117VSpont-B mouse brains into further groups of 117VV Tg30 mice to test for the presence of transmissible PrP assemblies (see below). Secondly, in order to determine the earliest age at which preclinical spontaneous PrP plaque deposits could be detected in 117VV Tg30 mouse brain, we set up a larger cohort of uninoculated mice in which groups were killed at specific time points. Using IHC analyses, we found that the incidence and severity of spontaneous PrP plaque deposition in the brain of 117VV Tg30 mice increased with age, with the first occurrence being at around 500 days (Fig 1C and S1 Data). Spontaneously generated PrP plaques were typically first detected in the anterior commissure, after which other brain areas became affected as the mice aged (S1 Fig). Notably, the occurrence of PrP plaque deposition in the brain of aged 117VV Tg30 mice remained stochastic rather than an inevitable consequence of old age (Fig 1C and S1 Data). In this regard, the oldest mouse was 950 days old when killed and did not display neurological symptoms, and its brain was devoid of abnormal PrP deposits when examined by IHC (Fig 1C and S1 Data).
Importantly, the deposition of abnormal PrP in 117VV Tg30 mouse appears to be directly related to the presence of the 117V point mutation in human PrP rather than overexpression of PrP per se. The 117V mutation in IPD patients is exclusively found on a PRNP 129V allele and in contrast to the PrP deposition seen in 117VV Tg30 mouse brain in which mutant PrP overexpression is 2-fold (compared to normal human brain) transgenic mice with 6-fold overexpression of wild-type human PrP 129V (129VV Tg152 or Tg152c mice) have never shown evidence for spontaneous development of PrP plaques in old age (>200 brains examined by IHC) [19,64,65].
117VV Tg30 mouse brains with spontaneous PrP deposits contain infectious PrP assemblies with transmission properties that mirror those from IPD A117V patient brain
Brain homogenates from 117VSpont-A and 117VSpont-B mice were inoculated intracerebrally into further groups of 117VV Tg30 mice that were then monitored for neurological symptoms over their lifespan and brain samples collected at autopsy to study abnormal PrP deposition. Remarkably, we found that all mice challenged with either the 117VSpont-A or 117VSpont-B brain homogenate became infected, resulting in intense and widespread PrP plaque deposition throughout the brain (Table 1, Fig 2, S2 Fig, and Fig 3).
Table 1. Primary transmission of spontaneous 117V prion isolates and IPD A117V patient brain to 117VV Tg30 mice.
Type of brain inoculum | Code | 117VV Tg30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total attack rate1 | Clinically affected | Incubation period (days p.i.)2 | Subclinically infected | ||
117VSpont-A | I1503 | 9/9 | 2/9 | 566, 733 | 7/93 |
117VSpont-B | I1506 | 6/6 | 2/6 | 616, 616 | 4/64 |
IPD A117V5 | I514 | 5/5 | 0/5 | >400–528 | 5/5 |
I1321 | 5/5 | 0/5 | >461–828 | 5/5 | |
I1322 | 4/4 | 0/4 | >327–612 | 4/4 |
1Total Attack rate is defined as the total of clinically affected and subclinically infected mice as a proportion of the number of inoculated mice. Subclinical prion infection was assessed by IB and/or IHC examination of brain.
2Incubation periods are reported for clinically affected mice in days p.i. When no clinical transmission of prion disease was observed, the interval between inoculation and death (from culling because of senescence, intercurrent illness, or termination of the experiment) is reported as >x–y days.
3Mice with subclinical infection were culled at 273, 404, 588, 657, 658, 728, and 728 days p.i.
4Mice with subclinical infection were culled at 238, 283, 352, and 525 days p.i.
5Primary transmission of IPD A117V prions from patient brain has been previously published [30].
Abbreviations: IB, immunoblotting; p.i., post-inoculation; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IPD, inherited prion disease
Neuronal loss and spongiosis was also observed, the intensity of which appeared to be related to the PrP plaque load in the affected brain area (S3 Fig). However, in the majority of mice (11/15), this infection did not produce neurological symptoms despite the severity of the PrP plaque deposition (Table 1). Notably, some of the subclinically infected mice (4/11) that showed abundant PrP plaque deposition in multiple brain areas were culled when less than 409 days old (Table 1). This finding contrasts strikingly with the complete absence of spontaneous PrP plaques in comparably aged uninoculated 117VV Tg30 (Fig 1C and S1 Data). Collectively, these transmission data establish that spontaneous generation of infectious PrP assemblies has occurred in the brain of the 117VSpont-A and 117VSpont-B mice. To facilitate readability, we hereafter refer to these as spontaneous 117V prion isolates.
Subsequent comparative analyses revealed that the transmission properties of spontaneous 117V prion isolates in 117VV Tg30 mice mirrored the transmission properties of brain homogenates from IPD A117V patients in human PrP 117V expressing mice (Table 1) [30]. The similarity between the patterns of PrP plaque deposition in the brain of 117VV Tg30 recipients challenged with spontaneous 117V prion isolates or IPD A117V patient brain is illustrated in Fig 2. Indeed, this distinctive PrP plaque morphology is also directly seen in IPD A117V patient brain (Fig 4). Importantly, immunoblot analyses of 117VV Tg30 mouse brain showed that recipients challenged with spontaneous 117V prion isolates also propagated abnormal PrP assemblies that were seen after challenge of 117VV Tg30 and 117VV Tg31 mice with IPD A117V patient brain homogenate (Fig 5) [30]. These comprise a labile PrPSc assembly generating proteolytic fragments of molecular mass 21 to 30 kDa (equivalent to prototypical PrP 27–30) [30] and an alternative and more stable PrP assembly that generates a characteristic proteolytic fragment of 8 kDa (Fig 5) [30] that can also form stable multimers migrating at 16 to 18 kDa and 22 to 23 kDa [32]. Collectively, the striking similarity of the molecular and neuropathological phenotypes that we observed strongly suggests that infectious assemblies of human PrP 117V that were spontaneously generated in the brain of 117VV Tg30 mice are congruent with those generated in IPD A117V patient brain.
Transmission properties of spontaneous 117V prion isolates after secondary passage in 117VV Tg30 mice
Spontaneous 117V prion isolates showed no major alteration of their transmission properties after secondary passage in 117VV Tg30 mice (S2 Fig; Table 2, Fig 6, S3 Fig, and S4 Fig). A total of 46 out of 47 inoculated mice were infected (Table 2) with preservation of a neuropathological phenotype dominated by the widespread occurrence of 117V PrP plaques (Fig 6). Notably, all mice in the secondary transmission series were subclinically infected; however, because they were culled before 460 days post-inoculation, it is clearly possible that some of these mice may have developed clinical prion disease had they lived longer. Nevertheless, the secondary passage data firmly establish that spontaneous 117V prion isolates do not adapt to produce a uniformly lethal spongiform encephalopathy with short mean incubation periods following serial passage in 117VV Tg30 mice (see Fig 7, which summarises the serial transmission findings for 117VSpont-A mouse brain).
Table 2. Secondary passage of spontaneous 117V prion isolates in 117VV Tg30 and 129VV Tg152 mice.
Inoculum details1 | Code | 117VV Tg30 | 129VV Tg152 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total attack rate2 | Clinical attack rate | Incubation period2 (days p.i.) | IB | IHC | Total attack rate2 | Clinical attack rate | Incubation period2 (days p.i.) | IB | IHC | ||
Passaged 117V Spont-A | I3912 | 8/8 | 0/8 | >211–456 | 8/8 | 7/7 | 0/6 | 0/6 | >185–457 | 0/6 | 0/6 |
I3911 | 8/8 | 0/8 | >417–457 | 7/8 | 8/8 | 6/8 | 0/8 | >427–456 | 0/8 | 6/8 | |
I4653 | 8/8 | 0/8 | >238–454 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 0/8 | 0/8 | >307–456 | 0/8 | 0/8 | |
Total | 24/24 | 0/24 | 23/24 | 23/23 | 6/22 | 0/22 | 0/22 | 6/22 | |||
Passaged 117V Spont-B |
I3913 | 5/5 | 0/5 | >416 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 4/9 | 0/9 | >268–457 | 4/9 | 0/9 |
I3914 | 9/10 | 0/10 | >259–456 | 9/9 | 9/10 | 1/6 | 0/6 | >346–456 | 1/6 | 0/6 | |
I4654 | 8/8 | 0/8 | >197–456 | 4/8 | 8/8 | 0/7 | 0/7 | >355–456 | 0/7 | 0/7 | |
Total | 22/23 | 0/23 | 18/22 | 22/23 | 5/22 | 0/22 | 5/22 | 0/22 |
1Spontaneous 117V prion isolates from Spont-A and Spont-B 117VV Tg30 mouse brain were passaged once in further 117VV Tg30 mice (see Table 1, S2 Fig). Provenance of the mice from which 1% (w/v) brain inocula were prepared are provided in S2 Fig.
2Total attack rate is defined as the total of clinically affected and subclinically infected mice as a proportion of the number of inoculated mice. Subclinical prion infection was assessed by IB and/or IHC examination of brain. Because no clinical transmission of prion disease was observed, the interval between inoculation and death (from culling because of intercurrent illness or termination of the experiment) is reported as >x–y days.
Abbreviations: IB, immunoblotting; IHC, immunohistochemistry; p.i., post-inoculation
One possible explanation for this apparent lack of adaptation may relate to the relative efficiencies of replication of the 2 disease-related 117V PrP assemblies that are propagating in these transmissions. Although accurate measurement of the concentration of the stable 117V PrP amyloid assembly would be possible, the inherent instability of the labile 117V PrPSc assembly [30] precludes reliable determination of its concentration using currently available methods. Consequently, it has not been possible to determine whether there is a difference in the ratio of the 2 disease-related 117V PrP assemblies in the brain of aged-matched clinically affected or subclinically infected 117VV Tg30 mice. However, in the case of the clinically affected 117VSpont-A mouse, its brain showed only focal 117V PrP plaques at a level very much lower than present in the brain of subclinically infected mice from the primary or secondary transmission series. These observations suggest that 117V PrP plaque load is dissociated from a clinical phenotype. Preferential propagation of the stable 117V PrP amyloid assembly rather than the labile 117V PrPSc assembly may therefore result in a progressive clinically silent PrP amyloidosis. Testing the validity of this hypothesis and whether efficient propagation of labile 117V PrPSc is responsible for clinical phenotype will now require the development of new methods for isolation of each distinct 117V PrP assembly.
Spontaneously generated 117V isolates can infect transgenic mice expressing wild-type human PrP
Variable conversion of wild-type PrP to pathogenic conformations is thought to be an important contributor to phenotypic variability in certain IPDs associated with different mutations [28,29,66–68]. Co-propagation of distinct disease-related PrP assemblies (infectious paired fibre PrP rods composed of proteotypical PrPSc or distinct PrP amyloid fibres) generated from either mutant or wild-type PrP, combined with differences in their regional distribution, abundance, and potential neurotoxicity, provides a complex molecular mechanism for generating phenotypic heterogeneity in patients with the same PRNP mutation.
Accordingly, in further transmission experiments, we examined whether spontaneous 117V prion isolates passaged once in 117VV Tg30 mice could also propagate in transgenic mice expressing wild-type human PrP 129V (S2 Fig). Surprisingly, we found that 25% (11/44) of inoculated 129VV Tg152 mice became subclinically infected. Abnormal PrP deposition, where detectable, was restricted to occasional, small PrP plaques in the corpus callosum (Fig 8), and immunoblot analysis showed the propagation of a disease-related wild-type PrP assembly that generated a proteolytic fragment of 8 kDa closely similar to that seen in 117VV Tg30 mice following challenge with the same isolates (Fig 5). In our wide experience of transmitting multiple sporadic or acquired CJD isolates to 129VV Tg152 mice [19,20,69–72] or the congenic 129VV Tg152c version of this line [65,73], we have never observed the propagation of a disease-related PrP isoform that generates a proteolytic fragment of 8 kDa rather than the typical PrP 27–30 fragment pattern derived from prototypical PrPSc. These data suggest that the stable 117V PrP assembly that generates the 8 kDa proteolytic fragment and forms amyloid plaques in 117VV Tg30 mice can also template the misfolding of wild-type human PrP 129V to a similar amyloid conformation. Based upon these findings, primary transmissions of A117V patient brain to mice expressing wild-type human PrP should be revisited and compared to the transmission properties of the same A117V patient isolates after passage in 117VV Tg30 mice to see if the transmission frequency of clinically silent amyloid phenotypes is similar.
Transgenic modelling provides insight into disease pathogenesis in IPD A117V patients
Spontaneous formation of disease-related PrP assemblies in transgenic mice expressing human PrP 117V but not in transgenic mice expressing human PrP 102L [43,59] or human PrP 200K [59] suggests that the spontaneous formation of abnormal 117V PrP assemblies occurs on a faster time scale. To seek evidence for this in humans, we examined the age of clinical disease onset in IPD patients with these different PRNP point mutations. We found that the mean age of clinical onset in IPD A117V patients was significantly earlier than seen in either IPD P102L or E200K patients (Table 3). These data suggest that the ability to model spontaneous prion disease pathogenesis in transgenic mice may be restricted to pathogenic human PrP mutants that are associated with early onset of disease. In this regard, it is likely that overexpression of mutant PrPC in the transgenic mice, coupled with inherent faster replication kinetics of 117V disease-related PrP assemblies would have acted together to result in the evolution of disease pathogenesis within the relatively short lifespan of a mouse.
Table 3. Age at clinical onset, duration and difference between IPD codon 129 homozygotes and heterozygotes.
PRNP mutation1 | Mean AAO (years ± standard deviation)2 | Mean clinical duration (months) | Mean difference in AAO between codon 129 homozygotes and heterozygotes (years) | Total no. of patients |
---|---|---|---|---|
A117V | 39.2 ± 7.0 | 49.4 | −10.03 | 19 |
P102L | 49.1 ± 10.8 | 48.0 | −5.84 | 38 |
E200K | 61.1 ± 11.6 | 5.1 | 1.35 | 18 |
1Patients with IPD were identified according to established WHO criteria by the NPC, London, the National CJD Research and Surveillance Unit, Edinburgh, and other referrers in the United Kingdom in the period from 1995 to 2015. For patients with the P102L mutation in PRNP, all 38 were assessed by the NPC and/or reported by Webb and colleagues [40]. For patients with the E200K mutation in PRNP, all 18 patients were seen by the NPC and recruited in the National Prion Monitoring Cohort study [87]. For patients with the A117V mutation in PRNP, 11 were assessed by the NPC and/or reported by Mallucci and colleagues [61], and 8 further patients were reported by European colleagues [25,88,89].
2All pairwise comparisons between mutations for mean AAOs were statistically significant (independent samples t-test, A117V versus P102L, p = 0.01; A117V versus E200K, p = 6.4 × 10−7; P102L versus E200K, p = 7.5 × 10−4). The mean duration was much shorter for E200K compared to either P102L or A117V (independent samples t test, A117V versus E200K, p = 1.3 × 10−7).
3The AAO for A117V valine homozygous individuals (n = 6) was 10.0 years earlier than for methionine-valine heterozygous individuals (n = 13), and this difference was statistically significant (independent samples t test, A117V codon 129 homozygous versus heterozygous, p = 0.039).
4The AAO for P102L codon 129 homozygous versus heterozygous was not statistically significant in these 38 patients and was significantly different in a previously reported pedigree [40] but not in a large international series [90].
5The AAO for E200K codon 129 homozygous versus heterozygous was not statistically significant.
Abbreviations: AAO, Age at clinical onset; IPD, inherited prion disease; NPC, National Prion Clinic; PRNP, human prion protein gene
Our finding that spontaneous 117V prion isolates once amplified in 117VV Tg30 mice can convert wild-type human PrP 129V to a protease-resistant form suggests that the pathological involvement of wild-type PrP may be an important modifier of disease pathogenesis in IPD A117V patients. Given the profound effect that codon 129 mismatch in wild-type PrP has in controlling disease pathogenesis in sporadic and acquired CJD (where heterozygosity at codon 129 is thought to confer resistance to prion disease by inhibiting homologous protein-protein interactions [71,74–76] and the presence of 129M or 129V controls the propagation of distinct human prion strains via conformational selection [2,9,15,18–20]), we looked for similar effects in IPD A117V patients. In keeping with similar findings with IPD associated with an insertion of 4, 5, or 6 extra octapeptide repeats [77–79], or in a pedigree of IPD P102L [40,80], we found that the age of onset of disease in IPD A117V patients whose wild-type PrP codon 129 genotype matched that of the mutant 117V PrP (129V) was significantly shorter than in codon 129 heterozygous patients (Table 3). The demonstration of conversion of wild-type PrP 129V in transgenic mice following challenge with infectious 117V PrP assemblies now provides a rational molecular basis for this effect.
Discussion
The extraordinary heterogeneity of neurodegenerative disease clinical phenotypes remains poorly understood. Study of human and animal prion diseases has led to a hypothesis that “strains” of disease-associated misfolded protein determine the brain regions most involved, the intensity of neurotoxicity, and hence clinical phenotype. In this study, we have developed an authentic animal model of IPD, which during aging spontaneously generates abnormal PrP assemblies and shows similar transmission properties in 117VV Tg30 mice compared to brain samples from IPD A117V patients. At the molecular level, these transmissions show clear evidence for the propagation of 2 distinct disease-related 117V PrP assemblies. These comprise a labile PrPSc assembly generating proteolytic fragments equivalent to prototypical PrP 27–30 similar to those typically seen in CJD, and a more stable PrP assembly that generates a characteristic proteolytic fragment of 8 kDa typically seen in GSS [30,31,32]. Efficient propagation of the labile PrPSc assembly is hypothesised to correlate with the occurrence of clinical prion disease whereas propagation of the stable amyloid PrP assembly appears to be tolerated by mice. At present, the structural similarity between the labile 117V PrPSc and classical PrPSc formed from wild-type PrP remains to be determined.
These findings are consistent with the highly distinct transmission properties of similar disease-associated PrP assembly states from GSS patients with the P102L PRNP mutation [33–35] and strongly support our recent proposal that authentic prions (infectious PrP rods 20 nm in width composed of prototypical PrPSc) are distinct from amyloid PrP assemblies that characterise the GSS IPD neuropathological phenotype [37,38].
To the best of our knowledge, 117VV Tg30 mice represent the first authentic transgenic model capable of recapitulating spontaneous prion disease pathogenesis seen in IPD, and these findings significantly support the protein-only hypothesis of prion propagation. Although other models that have superimposed human mutations onto rodent PrP are also capable of spontaneous formation of infectious PrP assemblies [44–54], our experience of direct modelling with mutant human PrP primary sequences [20,43,59] suggests that models involving mutated rodent PrP generate novel experimental prion strains rather than recapitulating the strains causing the human diseases.
The spontaneous generation of infectious 117V PrP assemblies in transgenic mice that we describe here provides important new insight into disease pathogenesis in IPD A117V patients. As our previous transgenic models of IPD P102L and E200K failed to generate spontaneous abnormal PrP assemblies, we speculated that the kinetics of spontaneous PrP misfolding associated with the A117V mutation may be more rapid, thereby enabling observation of de novo initiation of prion pathogenesis within the lifespan of a mouse. Comparison of the mean ages of clinical disease onset in patients strongly supports this idea, because IPD A117V patients have a significantly earlier age of onset than patients with IPD P102L or E200K. Moreover, the significant effect of codon 129 zygosity in modulating the age of disease onset seen in IPD A117V patients can now be reasonably explained by our finding that spontaneously generated 117V infectious PrP assemblies can convert wild-type human PrP 129V to a protease-resistant disease-related PrP assembly. However, it is important to mention that involvement of an additional mechanism for this effect cannot be excluded, because we have not yet examined whether wild-type human PrP 129M has partial dominant-negative inhibitory effects [73,76,81,82] on propagation of infectious PrP assemblies from mutant PrP 117V.
Conclusions
In summary, we report the first model of IPD that spontaneously generates both human prions and PrP amyloid. Our demonstration that 117VV Tg30 mice faithfully recapitulate IPD A117V molecular and neuropathological phenotypes suggests that these mice may be useful for future translational studies. Comparison of treatment groups with untreated aged cohorts of 117VV Tg30 mice should have the statistical power to inform upon the early or presymptomatic pathogenesis of disease and efficacy of long-term treatments that may prevent spontaneous prion disease. Treatments have or are being developed that target normal PrP [83–85], although these will need to have demonstrable safety before they could reasonably be tested in prevention of disease in healthy carriers of IPD mutations. The fact that distinct disease-associated PrP assemblies can be generated spontaneously in the same mouse is further evidence to caution against a therapeutic strategy based on targeting of one strain of abnormal PrP assembly [9].
Methods and materials
Ethics statement
Storage and biochemical analyses of post mortem human brain samples and transmission studies to mice were performed with written informed consent from patients with capacity to give consent. When patients were unable to give informed consent, assent was obtained from their relatives in accordance with UK legislation and Codes of Practice. Samples were stored and used in accordance with the Human Tissue Authority Codes of Practice and in line with the requirements of the Human Tissue Authority licence held by UCL Institute of Neurology. This study was performed with approval from the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and the UCL Institute of Neurology Joint Research Ethics Committee (now National Research Ethics Service Committee, London–Queen Square)—REC references: 03/N036, 03/N038 and 03/N133. Work with mice was performed under approval and licence granted by the UK Home Office (Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986); Project Licence number 70/6454, which conformed to University College London institutional and ARRIVE guidelines (www.nc3rs.org.uk/ARRIVE/).
Method details
Transgenic mice
Transgenic mice homozygous for a human PrP117V,129V transgene array and murine PrP null alleles (Prnpo/o) designated Tg(HuPrP117V 129V+/+ Prnpo/o)-30 mice (117VV Tg30) have been described previously [30] and were used without modification. Similarly, transgenic mice homozygous for a wild-type human PrP129V transgene array and murine PrP null alleles (Prnpo/o) designated Tg(HuPrP129V+/+ Prnpo/o)-152 mice (129VV Tg152) have been described previously [19,20,69–72] and were used without modification.
Transmission studies
Strict bio-safety protocols were followed. Inocula were prepared, using disposable equipment for each inoculum, in a microbiological containment level 3 laboratory and inoculations performed within a class 1 microbiological safety cabinet. For primary transmission and serial passages, groups of animals comprising 117VV Tg30 and 129VV Tg152 mice were inoculated with appropriate mouse brain homogenates. Details of primary transmissions of A117V patient brain samples to 117V Tg30 mice are described in the work by Asante and colleagues [30]. The genotype of each mouse was confirmed by PCR of ear tissue DNA prior to inclusion, and all mice were uniquely identified by subcutaneous transponders. Disposable cages were used, and all cage lids and water bottles were also uniquely identified by transponder and remained with each cage of mice throughout the incubation period. Mice (males and females aged 6–8 weeks allocated randomly to experimental groups) were anaesthetised with a mixture of halothane and O2 and intracerebrally inoculated into the right parietal lobe with 30 μl of 1% (w/v) brain homogenate prepared in Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline lacking Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions (D-PBS). All mice were then examined daily for early indicators of clinical prion disease, including piloerection, sustained erect ears, intermittent generalised tremor, unsustained hunched posture, rigid tail, mild loss of coordination, and clasping hind legs when lifted by the tail. Definite diagnosis of clinical prion disease (triggering experimental end point) was reached if mice exhibited any two early indicator signs in addition to one confirmatory sign or any two confirmatory signs. The confirmatory signs included ataxia, impairment of righting reflex, dragging of hind limbs, sustained hunched posture, or significant abnormal breathing. Mice were killed (by CO2 asphyxiation) if they exhibited any signs of distress or once a diagnosis of prion disease was established. Brains from inoculated mice were removed at autopsy, divided sagittally with half frozen, and half fixed in 10% buffered formol saline. Subsequent immunohistochemical or biochemical investigations were performed blind to sample provenance.
Neuropathological analysis
Brains were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for at least 48 hours and then immersed in 98% formic acid for 1 hour, postfixed in formalin, and then processed for paraffin wax embedding. Serial sections of 4-μm thickness were pretreated by boiling for 10 minutes in a low ionic strength buffer (2.1 mM Tris, 1.3 mM EDTA, 1.1 mM sodium citrate [pH 7.8]) before exposure to 98% formic acid for 5 minutes. Abnormal PrP accumulation was examined using anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies 3F4 [86] or ICSM 35 (D-Gen Ltd, London) on a Ventana benchmark XT automated immunohistochemical staining machine using proprietary secondary detection reagents (Roche, Burgess Hill, UK) before development with 3'3 diaminobenzedine tetrachloride as the chromogen [62]. Harris haematoxylin and eosin staining was done by conventional methods. Astrogliosis was determined by glial fibrillary acidic protein immunostaining following standard protocol. Appropriate controls were used throughout. Histological slides were digitised on a LEICA SCN400F scanner (LEICA Milton Keynes, UK) at 40× magnification with 65% image compression setting during export. Slides were archived and managed on LEICA Slidepath (LEICA Milton Keynes, UK). For the preparation of light microscopy images, image captures were taken and composed in Adobe Photoshop.
Immunoblotting
Preparation of brain homogenates (10% (w/v) in D-PBS), PK digestion (standard condition, 50 μg/mL PK in the sample for 1 hour at 37°C), and subsequent immunoblotting using high-sensitivity chemiluminescence was performed as described previously [62,63]. NaPTA precipitation of PrPSc from 10% (w/v) brain homogenates (117VSpont-A and 117VSpont-B isolates only) was performed using established procedures [62,63]. Blots were probed with anti-PrP monoclonal antibody ICSM 35 (epitope human PrP residues 93–105; D-Gen Ltd, London) in conjunction with an anti-mouse IgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugate and development in chemiluminescent substrate (CDP-Star; Tropix Inc) [62,63]. Primary screening of brain homogenates was performed blind to sample identity.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank all patients and their families for generously consenting to use of human tissues in this research. We thank our Biological Services Facility team for animal care, C. Powell and C. O’Malley for technical assistance, R. Young and R. Newton for preparation of the figures.
Abbreviations
- AAO
age at clinical onset
- BSE
bovine spongiform encephalopathy
- CJD
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease
- GSS
Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker
- IB
immunoblotting
- ICSM
Imperial College School of Medicine
- IHC
immunohistochemistry
- IPD
inherited prion disease
- NaPTA
sodium phosphotungstic acid
- NPC
National Prion Clinic
- p.i.
post-inoculation
- PK
proteinase K
- PrP
prion protein
- PRNP
human prion protein gene
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This research was initiated with funding from the Wellcome Trust and has been supported by the Medical Research Council (UK), and the European Commission. Some of this work was supported by the University College London Hospitals/University College London National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Prusiner SB Prions. Proc Natl Aca Sci USA 1998;95: 13363–13383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Collinge J, Clarke A. A general model of prion strains and their pathogenicity. Science 2007;318: 930–936. 10.1126/science.1138718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wadsworth JD, Collinge J. Molecular pathology of human prion disease. Acta Neuropathol 2011;121: 69–77. 10.1007/s00401-010-0735-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bessen RA, Marsh RF. Distinct PrP properties suggest the molecular basis of strain variation in transmissible mink encephalopathy. J Virol 1994;68: 7859–7868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Telling GC, Parchi P, DeArmond SJ, Cortelli P, Montagna P, Gabizon R et al. Evidence for the conformation of the pathologic isoform of the prion protein enciphering and propagating prion diversity. Science 1996;274: 2079–2082. 10.1126/science.274.5295.2079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Collinge J, Sidle KC, Meads J, Ironside J, Hill AF. Molecular analysis of prion strain variation and the aetiology of 'new variant' CJD. Nature 1996;383: 685–690. 10.1038/383685a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Safar J, Wille H, Itri V, Groth D, Serban H, Torchia M et al. Eight prion strains have PrPSc molecules with different conformations. Nat Med 1998;4: 1157–1165. 10.1038/2654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wenborn A, Terry C, Gros N, Joiner S, D'Castro L, Panico S et al. A novel and rapid method for obtaining high titre intact prion strains from mammalian brain. Sci Rep 2015;5: 10062 10.1038/srep10062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Collinge J. Mammalian prions and their wider relevance in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 539: 2016;217–226. 10.1038/nature20415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Parchi P, Giese A, Capellari S, Brown P, Schulz-Schaeffer W, Windl O et al. Classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease based on molecular and phenotypic analysis of 300 subjects. Ann. Neurol. 1999;46: 224–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hill AF, Joiner S, Wadsworth JD, Sidle KC, Bell JE, Budka H et al. Molecular classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Brain 2003;126: 1333–1346. 10.1093/brain/awg125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Collinge J. Molecular neurology of prion disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76: 906–919. 10.1136/jnnp.2004.048660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beck JA, Poulter M, Campbell TA, Adamson G, Uphill JB, Guerreiro R et al. PRNP allelic series from 19 years of prion protein gene sequencing at the MRC Prion Unit. Hum Mutat 2010;31: E1551–E1563. 10.1002/humu.21281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baiardi S, Rossi M, Capellari S, Parchi P Recent advances in the histo-molecular pathology of human prion disease. Brain Pathol 2018;29(2):278–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Collinge J. Prion diseases of humans and animals: their causes and molecular basis. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001;24: 519–550. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kovacs GG, Trabattoni G, Hainfellner JA, Ironside JW, Knight RS, Budka H. Mutations of the prion protein gene phenotypic spectrum. J Neurol 2002;249: 1567–1582. 10.1007/s00415-002-0896-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mead S. Prion disease genetics. European Journal of Human Genetics 2006;14: 273–281. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Collinge J. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet 1999;354: 317–323. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05128-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wadsworth JD, Asante EA, Desbruslais M, Linehan J, Joiner S, Gowland I et al. Human prion protein with valine 129 prevents expression of variant CJD phenotype. Science 2004;306: 1793–1796. 10.1126/science.1103932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wadsworth JD, Asante EA, Collinge J. Contribution of transgenic models to understanding human prion disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2010;36: 576–597. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01129.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Giaccone G, Verga L, Bugiani O, Frangione B, Serban D, Prusiner SB et al. Prion protein preamyloid and amyloid deposits in Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease, Indiana kindred. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89: 9349–9353. 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Piccardo P, Seiler C, Dlouhy SR, Young K, Farlow MR, Prelli F et al. Proteinase-K-resistant prion protein isoforms in Gerstmann- Straussler-Scheinker disease (Indiana kindred). J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1996;55: 1157–1163. 10.1097/00005072-199611000-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Piccardo P, Dlouhy SR, Lievens PMJ, Young K, Bird TD, Nochlin D et al. Phenotypic variability of Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease is associated with prion protein heterogeneity. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1998;57: 979–988. 10.1097/00005072-199810000-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Parchi P, Chen SG, Brown P, Zou W, Capellari S, Budka H et al. Different patterns of truncated prion protein fragments correlate with distinct phenotypes in P102L Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95: 8322–8327. 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Piccardo P, Liepnieks JJ, William A, Dlouhy SR, Farlow MR, Young K et al. Prion proteins with different conformations accumulate in Geustmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease caused by A117V and F198S mutations. Am. J. Pathol. 2001;158: 2201–2207. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64692-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Salmona M, Morbin M, Massignan T, Colombo L, Mazzoleni G, Capobianco R et al. Structural properties of Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease amyloid protein. J Biol Chem 2003;278(48): 48146–53. 10.1074/jbc.M307295200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hill AF, Joiner S, Beck J, Campbell TA, Dickinson A, Poulter M et al. Distinct glycoform ratios of protease resistant prion protein associated with PRNP point mutations. Brain 2006;129: 676–685. 10.1093/brain/awl013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wadsworth JD, Joiner S, Linehan J, Cooper S, Powell C, Mallinson G et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity in inherited prion disease (P102L) is associated with differential propagation of protease-resistant wild-type and mutant prion protein. Brain 2006;129: 1557–1569. 10.1093/brain/awl076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Monaco S, Fiorini M, Farinazzo A, Ferrari S, Gelati M, Piccardo P et al. Allelic origin of protease-sensitive and protease-resistant prion protein isoforms in Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease with the P102L mutation. PLoS ONE 2012;7: e32382 10.1371/journal.pone.0032382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Asante EA, Linehan JM, Smidak M, Tomlinson A, Grimshaw A, Jeelani A et al. Inherited prion disease A117V is not simply a proteinopathy but produces prions transmissible to transgenic mice expressing homologous prion protein. PLoS Pathog 2013;9: e1003643 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003643 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ghetti B, Piccardo P, Zanusso G. Dominantly inherited prion protein cerebral amyloidoses—a modern view of Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker. Handb Clin Neurol 2018;153: 243–269. 10.1016/B978-0-444-63945-5.00014-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cracco L, Xiao X, Nemani SK, Lavrich J, Cali I, Ghetti B et al. Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease revisited: accumulation of covalently-linked multimers of internal prion protein fragments. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2019;7: 85 10.1186/s40478-019-0734-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Piccardo P, Manson JC, King D, Ghetti B, Barron RM. Accumulation of prion protein in the brain that is not associated with transmissible disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104: 4712–4717. 10.1073/pnas.0609241104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Barron RM, King D, Jeffrey M, McGovern G, Agarwal S, Gill AC et al. PrP aggregation can be seeded by pre-formed recombinant PrP amyloid fibrils without the replication of infectious prions. Acta Neuropathol 2016;132(4):611–24. 10.1007/s00401-016-1594-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Barron RM. Infectious prions and proteinopathies. Prion 2017;11: 40–47. 10.1080/19336896.2017.1283464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Terry C, Wenborn A, Gros N, Sells J, Joiner S, Hosszu LL et al. Ex vivo mammalian prions are formed of paired double helical prion protein fibrils. Open Biol 2016;6: 160035 10.1098/rsob.160035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Terry C, Harniman RL, Sells J, Wenborn A, Joiner S, Saibil HR et al. Structural features distinguishing infectious ex vivo mammalian prions from non-infectious fibrillar assemblies generated in vitro. Sci Rep 2019;9: 376 10.1038/s41598-018-36700-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Terry C, Wadsworth JDF. Recent advances in understanding mammalian prion structure: A mini review. Front Mol Neurosci 2019;12: 169 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kovacs GG, Trabattoni G, Hainfellner JA, Ironside JW, Knight RS, Budka H. Mutations of the prion protein gene phenotypic spectrum. J Neurol 2002;249: 1567–1582. 10.1007/s00415-002-0896-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Webb TE, Poulter M, Beck J, Uphill J, Adamson G, Campbell T et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity and genetic modification of P102L inherited prion disease in an international series. Brain 2008;131: 2632–2646. 10.1093/brain/awn202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mead S, Reilly MM. A new prion disease: relationship with central and peripheral amyloidoses. Nat Rev Neurol 2015;11(2):90–7. 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim MO, Takada LT, Wong K, Forner SA, Geschwind MD. Genetic PrP Prion Diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2017;10(5) pii: a033134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Asante EA, Grimshaw A, Smidak M, Jakubcova T, Tomlinson A, Jeelani A et al. Transmission Properties of Human PrP 102L Prions Challenge the Relevance of Mouse Models of GSS. PLoS Pathog 2015;11: e1004953 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hsiao KK, Scott M, Foster D, Groth DF, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Spontaneous neurodegeneration in transgenic mice with mutant prion protein. Science 1990;250: 1587–1590. 10.1126/science.1980379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Telling GC, Haga T, Torchia M, Tremblay P, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Interactions between wild-type and mutant prion proteins modulate neurodegeneration transgenic mice. Genes Dev 1996;10: 1736–1750. 10.1101/gad.10.14.1736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Muramoto T, DeArmond S, Scott M, Telling GC, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB. Heritable disorder resembling neuronal storage disease in mice expressing prion protein with deletion of an alpha-helix. Nature Med 1997;3: 750–755. 10.1038/nm0797-750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shmerling D, Hegyi I, Fischer M, Blättler T, Brandner S, Götz J et al. Expression of amino-terminally truncated PrP in the mouse leading to ataxia and specific cerebellar lesions. Cell 1998;93: 203–214. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81572-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chiesa R, Piccardo P, Ghetti B, Harris DA. Neurological illness in transgenic mice expressing a prion protein with an insertional mutation. Neuron 1998;21: 1339–1351. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80653-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hegde RS, Mastrianni JA, Scott MR, DeFea KA, Tremblay P, Torchia M et al. A transmembrane from of the prion protein in neurodegenerative disease. Science 1998;279: 827–834. 10.1126/science.279.5352.827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nazor KE, Kuhn F, Seward T, Green M, Zwald D, Purro M et al. Immunodetection of disease-associated mutant PrP, which accelerates disease in GSS transgenic mice. EMBO J 2005;24: 2472–2480. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yang W, Cook J, Rassbach B, Lemus A, DeArmond SJ, Mastrianni JA. A new transgenic mouse model of Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome caused by the A117V mutation of PRNP. J Neurosci 2009;29: 10072–10080. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2542-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jackson WS, Borkowski AW, Faas H, Steele AD, King OD, Watson N et al. Spontaneous generation of prion infectivity in fatal familial insomnia knockin mice. Neuron 2009;63: 438–450. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Friedman-Levi Y, Meiner Z, Canello T, Frid K, Kovacs GG, Budka H et al. Fatal prion disease in a mouse model of genetic E200K Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. PLoS Pathog 2011;7: e1002350 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jackson WS, Borkowski AW, Watson NE, King OD, Faas H, Jasanoff A et al. Profoundly different prion diseases in knock-in mice carrying single PrP codon substitutions associated with human diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110: 14759–14764. 10.1073/pnas.1312006110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Castilla J, Gutierrez-Adan A, Brun A, Pintado B, Salguero FJ, Parra B et al. Transgenic mice expressing bovine PrP with a four extra repeat octapeptide insert mutation show a spontaneous, non-transmissible, neurodegenerative disease and an expedited course of BSE infection. FEBS Lett 2005;579(27):6237–46. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.09.099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Torres JM, Castilla J, Pintado B, Gutierrez-Adan A, Andreoletti O, Aguilar-Calvo P et al. Spontaneous generation of infectious prion disease in transgenic mice. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19: 1938–1947. 10.3201/eid1912.130106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wildegger G, Liemann S, Glockshuber R. Extremely rapid folding of the C-terminal domain of the prion protein without kinetic intermediates. Nature Struct Biol 1999;6: 550–553. 10.1038/9323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hart T, Hosszu LL, Trevitt CR, Jackson GS, Waltho JP, Collinge J et al. Folding kinetics of the human prion protein probed by temperature jump. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106: 5651–5656. 10.1073/pnas.0811457106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Asante EA, Gowland I, Grimshaw A, Linehan JM, Smidak M, Houghton R et al. Absence of spontaneous disease and comparative prion susceptibility of transgenic mice expressing mutant human prion proteins. J Gen Virol 2009;90: 546–558. 10.1099/vir.0.007930-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Watts JC, Giles K, Serban A, Patel S, Oehler A, Bhardwaj S et al. Modulation of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prion propagation by the A224V mutation. Ann Neurol 2015;78(4):540–53. 10.1002/ana.24463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mallucci GR, Campbell TA, Dickinson A, Beck J, Holt M, Plant G et al. Inherited prion disease with an alanine to valine mutation at codon 117 in the prion protein gene. Brain 1999;122 (Pt 10): 1823–1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wadsworth JD, Powell C, Beck JA, Joiner S, Linehan JM, Brandner S et al. Molecular diagnosis of human prion disease. Methods Mol Biol 2008;459: 197–227. 10.1007/978-1-59745-234-2_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wadsworth JD, Joiner S, Hill AF, Campbell TA, Desbruslais M, Luthert PJ et al. Tissue distribution of protease resistant prion protein in variant CJD using a highly sensitive immuno-blotting assay. Lancet 2001;358: 171–180. 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05403-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wadsworth JD, Joiner S, Linehan JM, Balkema-Buschmann A, Spiropoulos J, Simmons MM et al. Atypical scrapie prions from sheep and lack of disease in transgenic mice overexpressing human prion protein. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19: 1731–1739. 10.3201/eid1911.121341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Joiner S, Asante EA, Linehan JM, Brock L, Brandner S, Bellworthy SJ et al. Experimental sheep BSE prions generate the vCJD phenotype when serially passaged in transgenic mice expressing human prion protein. J Neurol Sci 2018;386: 4–11. 10.1016/j.jns.2017.12.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Gabizon R, Telling G, Meiner Z, Halimi M, Kahana I, Prusiner SB. Insoluble wild-type and protease-resistant mutant prion protein in brains of patients with inherited prion disease. Nat Med 1996;2: 59–64. 10.1038/nm0196-59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Silvestrini MC, Cardone F, Maras B, Pucci P, Barra D, Brunori M et al. Identification of the prion protein allotypes which accumulate in the brain of sporadic and familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease patients. Nat Med 1997;3: 521–525. 10.1038/nm0597-521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Chen SG, Parchi P, Brown P, Capellari S, Zou WQ, Cochran EJ et al. Allelic origin of the abnormal prion protein isoform in familial prion diseases. Nat Med 1997;3: 1009–1015. 10.1038/nm0997-1009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Collinge J, Palmer MS, Sidle KCL, Hill AF, Gowland I, Meads J et al. Unaltered susceptibility to BSE in transgenic mice expressing human prion protein. Nature 1995;378: 779–783. 10.1038/378779a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hill AF, Desbruslais M, Joiner S, Sidle KCL, Gowland I, Collinge J. The same prion strain causes vCJD and BSE. Nature 1997;389: 448–450. 10.1038/38925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Asante EA, Linehan J, Gowland I, Joiner S, Fox K, Cooper S et al. Dissociation of pathological and molecular phenotype of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in transgenic human prion protein 129 heterozygous mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103: 10759–10764. 10.1073/pnas.0604292103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wadsworth JD, Joiner S, Linehan JM, Desbruslais M, Fox K, Cooper S et al. Kuru prions and sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prions have equivalent transmission properties in transgenic and wild-type mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105: 3885–3890. 10.1073/pnas.0800190105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Asante EA, Smidak M, Grimshaw A, Houghton R, Tomlinson A, Jeelani A et al. A naturally occurring variant of the human prion protein completely prevents prion disease. Nature 2015;522: 478–481. 10.1038/nature14510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Collinge J, Palmer MS, Dryden AJ. Genetic predisposition to iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet 1991;337: 1441–1442. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93128-v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Palmer MS, Dryden AJ, Hughes JT, Collinge J. Homozygous prion protein genotype predisposes to sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Nature 1991;352: 340–342. 10.1038/352340a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hizume M, Kobayashi A, Teruya K, Ohashi H, Ironside JW, Mohri S et al. Human prion protein (PrP) 219K is converted to PrPSc but shows heterozygous inhibition in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease infection. J Biol Chem 2009;284: 3603–3609. 10.1074/jbc.M809254200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Mead S, Poulter M, Beck J, Webb T, Campbell T, Linehan J et al. Inherited prion disease with six octapeptide repeat insertional mutation—molecular analysis of phenotypic heterogeneity. Brain 2006;129: 2297–2317. 10.1093/brain/awl226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mead S, Webb TE, Campbell TA, Beck J, Linehan J, Rutherfoord S et al. Inherited prion disease with 5-OPRI: phenotype modification by repeat length and codon 129. Neurology 2007;69: 730–738. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000267642.41594.9d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kaski DN, Pennington C, Beck J, Poulter M, Uphill J, Bishop MT et al. Inherited prion disease with 4-octapeptide repeat insertion: disease requires the interaction of multiple genetic risk factors. Brain 2011;134: 1829–1838. 10.1093/brain/awr079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Webb T, Mead S, Beck J, Uphill J, Pal S, Hampson S et al. Seven year discordance in age at onset in monozygotic twins with inherited prion disease (P102L). Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2009;35(4): 427–32. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2009.01012.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Perrier V, Kaneko K, Safar J, Vergara J, Tremblay P, DeArmond SJ et al. Dominant-negative inhibition of prion replication in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99: 13079–13084. 10.1073/pnas.182425299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Striebel JF, Race B, Meade-White KD, LaCasse R, Chesebro B. Strain specific resistance to murine scrapie associated with a naturally occurring human prion protein polymorphism at residue 171. PLoS Pathog 2011;7: e1002275 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Nicoll AJ, Collinge J. Preventing prion pathogenicity by targeting the cellular prion protein. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2009;9: 48–57. 10.2174/1871526510909010048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Nicoll AJ, Trevitt CR, Tattum MH, Risse E, Quarterman E, Ibarra AA et al. Pharmacological chaperone for the structured domain of human prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107: 17610–17615. 10.1073/pnas.1009062107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Klyubin I, Nicoll AJ, Khalili-Shirazi A, Farmer M, Canning S, Mably A et al. Peripheral administration of a humanized anti-PrP antibody blocks Alzheimer's disease abeta synaptotoxicity. J Neurosci 2014;34: 6140–6145. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3526-13.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kascsak RJ, Rubenstein R, Merz PA, Tonna DeMasi M, Fersko R, Carp RI et al. Mouse polyclonal and monoclonal antibody to scrapie-associated fibril proteins. J Virol 1987;61: 3688–3693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Thompson AG, Lowe J, Fox Z, Lukic A, Porter MC, Ford L et al. The Medical Research Council Prion Disease Rating Scale: a new outcome measure for prion disease therapeutic trials developed and validated using systematic observational studies. Brain 2013;136: 1116–1127. 10.1093/brain/awt048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Mastrianni JA, Curtis MT, Oberholtzer JC, Da Costa MM, DeArmond S, Prusiner SB et al. Prion disease (PrP-A117V) presenting with ataxia instead of dementia. Neurology 1995;45: 2042–2050. 10.1212/wnl.45.11.2042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Tranchant C, Sergeant N, Wattez A, Mohr M, Warter JM, Delacourte A. Neurofibrillary tangles in Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome with the A117V prion gene mutation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;63: 240–246. 10.1136/jnnp.63.2.240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Minikel EV, Vallabh SM, Orseth MC, Brandel JP, Haik S, Laplanche JL et al. Age at onset in genetic prion disease and the design of preventive clinical trials. Neurology 2019;3(2): e125–e134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.