Abstract
Background
Most Clostridioides difficile toxinogenic strains produce both toxins A and B (A+B+), but toxin A–negative, toxin B–positive (A−B+) variants also cause disease. We report the identification of a series of pathogenic clinical C. difficile isolates that produce high amounts of toxin A with low or nondetectable toxin B.
Methods
An ultrasensitive, quantitative immunoassay was used to measure toxins A and B in stool samples from 187 C. difficile infection (CDI) patients and 44 carriers. Isolates were cultured and assessed for in vitro toxin production and in vivo phenotypes (mouse CDI model).
Results
There were 7 CDI patients and 6 carriers who had stools with detectable toxin A (TcdA, range 23–17 422 pg/mL; 5.6% of samples overall) but toxin B (TcdB) below the clinical detection limit (<20 pg/mL; median TcdA:B ratio 17.93). Concentrations of toxin A far exceeded B in in vitro cultures of all 12 recovered isolates (median TcdA:B ratio 26). Of 8 toxin A>>B isolates tested in mice, 4 caused diarrhea, and 3 of those 4 caused lethal disease. Ribotyping demonstrated strain diversity. TcdA-predominant samples were also identified at 2 other centers, with similar frequencies (7.5% and 6.8%).
Conclusions
We report the discovery of clinical pathogenic C. difficile strains that produce high levels of toxin A but minimal or no toxin B. This pattern of toxin production is not rare (>5% of isolates) and is consistently observed in vitro and in vivo in humans and mice. Our study highlights the significance of toxin A in human CDI pathogenesis and has important implications for CDI diagnosis, treatment, and vaccine development.
Keywords: C. difficile, toxin A, toxin B
We identified multiple pathogenic clinical isolates of Clostridioides difficile that produced high levels of toxin A but minimal or no toxin B, highlighting the pathogenic significance of toxin A and implications for C. difficile infection diagnoses, treatment, and vaccine development.
Clostridioides difficile is an anaerobic, spore-forming, gram-positive bacterium and is the most prevalent cause of infectious diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis in hospitalized patients. Despite significant advances in the field of C. difficile infection (CDI) over the past 3 decades, CDI remains responsible for high morbidity and mortality [1, 2]. The major virulence factors of C. difficile are thought to be 2 structurally similar toxins, denoted as toxin A and toxin B (TcdA and TcdB, encoded by the tcdA and tcdB genes) [3]. Prior to the 1990s, pathogenic strains were thought to always simultaneously produce both toxins (A+B+). However, with the development of new detection technologies and the potential evolution of C. difficile, numerous toxin A–negative, toxin B–positive (A−B+) strains have been isolated worldwide since the early 1990s [4, 5]. These isolates cause the full disease spectrum of CDI, despite only producing 1 of the 2 major toxins [5, 6]. The increased frequency of A−B+ isolates and their demonstrated ability to cause severe disease [5] have triggered many investigations that have highlighted the importance of toxin B in the pathogenesis of CDI and downplayed the significance of toxin A. Although both toxin A and B can independently cause disease in animal models [3, 7], toxin B is now often considered the primary mediator of symptomatic infection, leading to a focus on toxin B as a diagnostic and therapeutic target.
Reports of naturally occurring toxin B–deficient mutant isolates (A+B- variants) are extremely rare. We found 1 case report from 1998 of infection with a suspected A+B- strain [8, 9]. However, this strain did not produce any detectable toxin A in vitro, bringing into question its relevance as the cause of the patient’s symptoms. Another sporadic case of apparent infection caused by an A+B- strain has been described, and the toxin B deficiency was confirmed by cytotoxicity assay and DNA sequencing [10]. Importantly, however, A+B- variants have not previously been convincingly demonstrated to cause human CDI.
We here report the identification of a series of pathogenic clinical C. difficile strains that produced high amounts of toxin A with low or nondetectable toxin B, demonstrating that toxin A–predominant strains can also cause human CDI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clinical Stool Specimens and Isolation of Bacterial Strains
Stool samples were collected from 187 CDI patients and 44 carriers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center under Internal Review Board–approved protocols, as previously described [11, 12]; all samples tested positive by the Cepheid Xpert C. difficile/Epi nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA), which detects the presence of the tcdB gene. Briefly, CDI patients had clinical diarrhea and tested positive on clinical NAAT performed on their stool, and carriers had recently received antibiotics, did not have diarrhea, and tested positive on NAAT performed on their stool. Samples were also collected under the parent Internal Review Board protocol from pediatric (Boston Children’s Hospital) and adult (Texas Medical Center) patients with clinical diarrhea who tested positive for C. difficile on routine clinical testing algorithms. Strains were cultured from stool as previously described [13]. Briefly, stool specimens were grown anaerobically on C. difficile–selective cycloserine cefoxitin fructose agar (Anaerobe Systems, Morgan Hill, CA), after ethanol shock treatment. Colonies of C. difficile were identified on the basis of distinct colony morphology, “horse barn” odor, and Gram stain. For each isolate, in vitro toxin production and activity were assessed by culture and cytotoxicity assay (CTA). The presence of tcdA and B, C. difficile–specific 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid and a C. difficile housekeeping gene (tpi) were further verified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [13]. VPI 10463 (A+B+), CF2 5340 (A+B-) [14] and BAA-1801(A-B-) strains were used as controls. The specific primers [15, 16] are shown in Supplementary Table 2.
Preparation of Culture Filtrates
A series of clinical strains previously isolated from cycloserine cefoxitin fructose agar plates were cultured in Difco cooked meat media (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) for 24, 48, and 72 hours. Culture filtrates were prepared by 10 000g centrifugation (10 minutes) to obtain a supernatant, followed by passage through an 0.45 µm syringe filter and then the addition of a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) at a ratio of 1:25. Samples were aliquoted and frozen at −80°C before use. The in vitro production of toxins A and B was determined for all isolates by Simoa assays, as described below. The culture filtrate of the high toxin-producing strain VPI 10463 (A+B+) was used as a control.
Simoa Assays
The C. difficile Simoa assay is an ultrasensitive, quantitative single molecule array immunoassay for the detection and quantification of free toxins A and B in stool samples [12]. Details of the Simoa assays have been described previously [12]. In this study, the Simoa immunoassay was used to measure toxins A and B in clinical stool specimens, culture filtrates, and mouse cecal or colonic aspirate samples. Samples were tested diluted at 1:21 and at 1:1050 for culture filtrate or mouse cecal content samples with toxin A and/or B measurements >100 000 pg/mL at 1:21 dilution. Results are given in pg/ml in the diluted sample (1:21). The limits of detection for toxins A and B in stool (and culture filtrate) were 0.6 and 2.9 pg/mL, respectively.
Animal Model of Clostridioides difficile Infection
A mouse model of C. difficile infection was utilized as previously described [17]. Briefly, pathogen-free wild-type C57BL/6 mice (female; 6–8 weeks old) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All animals were housed in groups of 3 per cage under specific, pathogen-free conditions and fed ad libitum with standard rodent chow (Purina 5000) and fresh, distilled water. Prior to infection, mice were pretreated with a 5-antibiotic cocktail consisting of kanamycin (40 mg/kg), gentamicin (3.5 mg/kg), colistin (4.2 mg/kg), metronidazole (21.5 mg/kg), and vancomycin (4.5 mg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) administered ad libitum in drinking water for 3 days. The antibiotic suspension was freshly prepared every day. The concentration of the antimicrobial mixture was calculated based on the average weight of the mice and their expected water consumption. After the treatment, water was switched to regular, autoclaved water for 2 days to avoid residual metronidazole or vancomycin repressing C. difficile growth, followed by the intraperitoneal injection of a single dose of clindamycin (10 mg/kg). After a further 24 hours, animals were inoculated intragastrically with 200 μL Difco cooked meat media (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ), containing 0.5 × 105 colony-forming units of toxinogenic C. difficile strain VPI 10463 or study clinical isolates. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee committee of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Ribotyping of Clostridioides difficile Isolates
Fluorescent ribotyping was performed as previously described [18, 19]. This technique does not distinguish between ribotypes 053 and 163, ribotypes 014 and 020, or ribotypes 078 and 126; therefore, these are reported as combined ribotypes (ie, 053-163, 014-020, and 078-126).
RESULTS
Toxin Detection in Stools of Clostridioides difficile Infection Patients and Asymptomatic Carriers
A total of 231 NAAT-positive clinical stool specimens, obtained from 187 CDI patients and 44 carriers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, were tested for TcdA and TcdB with Simoa assays, as reported in our prior studies [11, 12]. As shown in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1, most of the stool samples contained more TcdB than TcdA (the median TcdA:TcdB ratios for the 187 CDI patients and 44 carriers were 0.74 and 0.68, respectively). Unexpectedly, we observed samples that had high concentrations of toxin A but minimal/undetectable toxin B, and further pursued that observation in this study.
Of the 231 patients providing samples, 7 CDI patients (7/187, 3.7%) and 6 carriers (6/44, 13.6%) had stools with detectable concentrations of TcdA (mean 1559.8; range 23–17 422 pg/mL), while TcdB was below the clinical cutoff of 20 pg/mL (mean 7.4; range 2–12.5 pg/mL; Table 1) [11, 12]. The average and median ratios of TcdA:TcdB in these 13 individuals were 177.62 and 17.93 (range 6.3 to 1914.5), indicating that TcdA was produced at substantially higher levels than TcdB. Samples with the same TcdA-predominant pattern were also observed in cohorts of pediatric (Boston Children’s Hospital) and adult (Texas Medical Center) CDI patients, with rates of 7.5% and 6.8%, respectively (Supplementary Tables 3 and 4).
Table 1.
Variable | BID-20 | BID-37 | BID-71 | M-118 | M-223 | M-391 | M-494 | M-639 | M-687 | R1A-007 | R1A-070 | R1A-086 | R1A-122 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | F | F | M | M | M | F | F | F | F | F | F | M | F |
Age | 29 | 36 | 58 | 39 | 61 | 63 | 70 | 89 | 83 | 61 | 64 | 68 | 74 |
Inpatient vs outpatient | Outpatient | Outpatient | Inpatient | Inpatient | Inpatient | Inpatient | Inpatient | Inpatient | Inpatient | Inpatient | Inpatient | Inpatient | Inpatient |
CDI vs carrier | CDI | Unknowna | CDIb | Carrier | Carrier | Carrier | Carrier | Carrier | Carrier | CDI | CDI | CDI | CDIc |
C. difficile toxin concentrations in stool samples | |||||||||||||
TcdA, pg/ml | 105.0 | 115.0 | 23.0 | 110.5 | 61.2 | 74.5 | 127.3 | 358.0 | 1213.9 | 53.0 | 17 422.0 | 94.7 | 519.5 |
TcdB, pg/ml | 3.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 12.5 | 6.6 | 9.1 | 7.1 | 7.6 | 8.0 | 8.4 | 9.1 | 9.9 | 8.6 |
A/B ratio | 35.0 | 28.8 | 11.5 | 8.8 | 9.3 | 8.2 | 17.9 | 47.1 | 151.7 | 6.3 | 1914.5 | 9.6 | 60.4 |
Laboratory findings | |||||||||||||
WBC, ×10 9 cells/mcL | 7.2 | 11.8 | 39.9 | 2.4 | 15.9 | 5.3 | 13.8 | 8.7 | 22.2 | 4.2 | 6.5 | 6.8 | 8.1 |
Creatinine, mg/dL | Unknown | 0.6 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
Albumin, mg/dL | Unknown | Unknown | 2.4 | 3.8 | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | 2.5 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Frozen stool samples (diluted 1:21) were tested by Simoa for quantitative detection of TcdA and TcdB.
Abbreviations: CDI, Clostridioides difficile infection; F, female; ICU, intensive care unit; M, male; WBC, white blood cell.
aStool frequency at the time of sample collection was unknown; thus, CDI status could not be confirmed.
bPatient was admitted to the ICU within 40 days of sample collection, and CDI was noted to be a contributing factor to the admission.
cPatient was admitted to the ICU within 40 days of sample collection, but CDI was not felt to be a contributing factor.
Clinical Characteristics of Patients Infected With Clostridioides difficile A>>B Variants
The clinical characteristics of 13 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center patients infected with the C. difficile toxin A>>B variants are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 61.2 years (age range 29–89 years). The majority of the patients (76.9%) were older than 55 years. The mean ages of CDI patients and carriers were 55.7 and 67.5 years, respectively; overall, 9/13 (69.2%) were female. Toxin A:B ratios in carriers were similar to those in CDI cases. Based on the elevated white blood cell count and creatinine measures, as well as a CDI-related intensive care unit admission, patient BID-71 had severe CDI, indicating that an isolate with no detectable toxin B production was associated with severe CDI. The clinical syndromes associated with these A>>B variant strains were similar to what has been generally reported in other clinical studies of CDI. Symptoms ranged from asymptomatic carriage to severe diarrhea.
Molecular Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Isolates
We successfully cultivated 12 C. difficile strains from 13 fecal samples (Table 2). (R1A-070 could not be isolated because of an improper sample preservation.) The 12 A+B- isolates belonged to 9 different ribotypes (Table 2). The most common ribotype observed was F106 (4 of 12). All 12 isolates carried both tcdA and tcdB genes. Testing of clinical stool samples by the Xpert assay indicated that neither the binary toxin-encoding gene (cdtA) nor an 18-bp deletion at position 117 in the tcdC gene were present in any sample.
Table 2.
No. | Isolate | tcdA, tcdB a | Binary Toxin (cdtA)b | tcdC deletion (repressor deletion 117)b | Ribotype | Cytotoxicity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | BID-20 | + | – | – | F137 | + |
2 | BID-37 | + | – | – | F106 | + |
3 | BID-71 | + | – | – | F106 | + |
4 | M-118 | + | – | – | F056 | + |
5 | M-223 | + | – | – | F255 | + |
6 | M-391 | + | – | – | F014-020 | + |
7 | M-494 | + | – | – | F106 | + |
8 | M-639 | + | – | – | F014-020 | + |
9 | M-687 | + | – | – | F002 | + |
10 | R1A-007 | + | – | – | F106 | + |
11 | R1A-086 | + | – | – | F001 | + |
12 | R1A-122 | + | – | – | F053-163 | + |
We successfully cultured 12 isolates of Clostridioides difficile from 13 stool samples (from patients indicated in Table 1).
Abbreviations: -, absence; +, presence.
aAll strains were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction to verify the presence of tcdA and tcdB genes.
bAnalyzed by Cepheid Xpert Clostridioides difficile/EPI.
Detection and Quantification of Toxins in Culture Filtrates of Clostridioides difficile Isolates
To examine whether the toxin A>>B phenotype observed in human clinical specimens was also observed in vitro, TcdA and TcdB were measured by Simoa in culture supernatants harvested at 24, 48, and 72 hours of culture. Consistent with the quantification of TcdA and TcdB in clinical stool specimens, the concentrations of TcdA far exceeded those of TcdB in supernatants from in vitro cultures of all 12 strains (A:B median ratio 20.95 and range 8.3 to 930.9 at 24 hours; A:B median ratio 22.5 and range 10.2 to 1678.7 at 48 hours; A:B median ratio 25.7 and range 11.1 to 3577.6 at 72 h; Table 3; Supplementary Figure 3). Under the same culture conditions, the ratios of TcdA:TcdB for C. difficile VPI 10463 were 2.3, 1.3, and 1.1 at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. For each isolate, toxin activity in vitro was also assessed by tissue culture CTA; all supernatants tested positive by CTA (Table 2).
Table 3.
Strains | 24h | 24h | 24h | 48h | 48h | 48h | 72h | 72h | 72h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A, pg/mL | B, pg/mL | A/B ratio | A, pg/mL | B, pg/mL | A/B ratio | A, pg/mL | B, pg/mL | A/B ratio | |
VPI 10463 | >2 000 000.0 | 887 155.4 | ~2.3 | >2 000 000.0 | 1 503 972.4 | ~1.3 | >2 000 000.0 | 1 763 053.4 | ~1.1 |
BID-20 | 5751.8 | 275.2 | 20.9 | 27 809.8 | 1222.9 | 22.7 | 39 395.2 | 1737.2 | 22.7 |
BID-37 | 1368.4 | 65.1 | 21 | 17 028.1 | 539.8 | 31.5 | 35 460.6 | 1095.2 | 32.4 |
BID-71 | 1303.2 | 1.4 | 930.9 | 10 072.2 | 6 | 1678.7 | 33 629.6 | 9.4 | 3577.6 |
M-118 | 17 278.8 | 506.3 | 34.1 | 116 582.8 | 2944.6 | 39.6 | 163 083.6 | 3750.6 | 43.5 |
M-223 a | 2241.6 | 148.4 | 15.1 | 22 710.4 | 1186.8 | 19.1 | 30 542.6 | 1622.8 | 18.8 |
M-391 | 2173.2 | 242.9 | 8.9 | 15 851.1 | 1554.2 | 10.2 | 18 239.2 | 1646 | 11.1 |
M-494 | 1360.4 | 83 | 16.4 | 23 760.6 | 1063.8 | 22.3 | 29 700.4 | 1254.4 | 23.7 |
M-639 | 3372.3 | 407.6 | 8.3 | 19 623.9 | 1891.6 | 10.4 | 22 174.6 | 1949 | 11.4 |
M-687 | 10 598.8 | 465.7 | 22.8 | 36 865.3 | 1620.2 | 22.8 | 48 283.4 | 1876.8 | 25.7 |
R1A-007 | 2906.2 | 167.2 | 17.4 | 14 325.6 | 676.4 | 21.2 | 18 779.4 | 713 | 26.3 |
R1A-086 | 34 464.2 | 1000.9 | 34.4 | 161 605.4 | 5069.1 | 37.7 | 181 810.6 | 5192 | 35 |
R1A-122 a | 20 190.4 | 886.6 | 22.8 | 65 253 | 3317.4 | 19.7 | 11 657 | 410 | 28.45 |
Strain VPI10463 (a high toxin A and B producer) was used as a control. We incubated 1 × 108 colony-forming units of the vegetative cells of the 12 clinical isolates anaerobically for 24, 48, and 72 hours in cooked meat medium or CCMB-TAL medium. Concentrations of TcdA and TcdB in the resulting conditioned media were determined by Simoa assay.
aIncubated in cycloserine-cefoxitin mannitol broth with taurocholate and lysozyme(CCMB-TAL) medium.
Virulence of TcdA>>B Strains in Mouse Model
To further examine these clinical isolates in vivo by a CDI mouse model, we infected groups of healthy C57BL/6 mice (n = 3, per strain) with C. difficile VPI 10463 (control) and 8 clinical isolates with variable toxin A:B ratios, based on Simoa toxin measurements in stool samples (BID-20, BID-37, BID-71, M-639, M-687, R1A-122, R1A-086, and R1A-007). Mice infected by VPI 10463 showed typical symptoms of CDI, including weight loss, a hunching posture, and diarrhea, while the clinical manifestations of mice infected with the A>>B variants varied from no evidence of disease to severe or fatal infections (Table 4; Supplementary Figure 4). Colonic tissue segments were examined for pathologic evidence of damage (Supplementary Figure 2). Uninfected control mice did not exhibit any pathological damage (Supplementary Figure 2A). On Day 3 postinfection, severe mucosal damage, including edema, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and epithelial cell damage, was evident in VPI 10463 (Supplementary Figure 2B) and in 3 of 7 C. difficile variant–infected mice examined pathologically (Supplementary Figure 2C, R1A-086; Supplementary Figure 2D, BID-20; and Supplementary Figure 2E, M-687); only minor pathological manifestations were found in mice infected with R1A-122 (Supplementary Figure 2F), BID-37 (Supplementary Figure 2G), R1A-007 (Supplementary Figure 2H), and M-639 (Supplementary Figure 2I). The measurement of cecal toxin concentrations in 1 group of variant-infected mice (strain BID-71; n = 3) revealed that cecal toxin concentrations were >200 000 pg/ml toxin A and ~100 pg/ml toxin B.
Table 4.
Strains | Diarrhea %, n/N | Mortality %, n/N | Relative Weight %, Death or Day 3 |
---|---|---|---|
VPI 10463 | 100 (3/3) | 100 (3/3) | 87.95 |
BID-20 | 100 (3/3) | 100 (3/3) | 83.17 |
BID-37 | 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 94.26 |
BID-71 | 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 105.3 |
M-639 | 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 96.32 |
M-687 | 66.7 (2/3) | 33.3 (1/3) | 84.89 |
R1A-122 | 33.3 (1/3) | 0 (0/3) | 100.7 |
R1A-086 | 100 (3/3) | 100 (3/3) | 84.23 |
R1A-007 | 0 (0/3) | 0 (0/3) | 97.21 |
DISCUSSION
We here report the discovery of clinical pathogenic C. difficile strains that produce high levels of toxin A but minimal toxin B. This pattern of toxin production is not rare (>5% of isolates) and has consistently been observed in vitro and in vivo in both humans and mice. Similar to typical A+B+ strains, the A>>B clinical isolates were responsible for both clinical infection and colonization in our human study population, and likewise caused a range of clinical phenotypes in mice. Although disease was not recapitulated in the mouse model for all strains that caused disease in humans, we have observed the same phenomenon previously for other unrelated strains [17]. These data suggest that the significance of toxin A in human CDI pathogenesis cannot be overlooked, and have important implications for CDI diagnosis, treatment, and vaccine development.
It is now accepted that both toxins A and B are proinflammatory, cytotoxic, and enterotoxic in the human colon [20]. Their relative importance in the pathogenesis of CDI has been studied extensively but still remains controversial [21]. Earlier animal experiments with purified toxins had indicated that toxin A alone was able to induce C. difficile disease pathology, whereas toxin B was believed to act synergistically with toxin A [22]. However, 2 independent studies with genetically engineered C. difficile strains that produced either only toxin A (A+B- mutant) or toxin B (A-B+ mutant) have yielded conflicting results regarding the importance of toxin A [3, 23]. In 1 study, the authors concluded that toxin B, and not toxin A, is essential for CDI [23]. The second study showed that either mutant was capable of causing disease, but A-B+ mutants caused more severe disease [3]. However, the relative importance of these toxins in human CDI cannot be fully predicted from studies using animal models. Our study results challenge the view that toxin B is the sole or dominant virulence factor of C. difficile.
Our study has several limitations. First, the main study was conducted at a single center. Although our study population was inclusive of both CDI patients and carriers, these findings needed to be repeated in other cohorts. Notably, we have also observed similar findings (stool samples with toxin A>>B, with toxin B concentrations below our clinical cutoff) in samples from 2 other institutions (Boston Children’s Hospital and Texas Medical Center), at similar rates (7.5% and 6.8%, respectively).We also acknowledge that in vitro toxin production does not necessarily reflect toxin production in a human host, but note that we initially discovered these isolates due to our inability to detect toxin B in clinical stool samples using an ultrasensitive assay. We also acknowledge the possibility that toxin B from the A>>B isolates was detected less efficiently (by our Simoa assay reagents) than toxin B from other isolates. However, we preliminarily have not observed any consistent changes in the tcdB sequences of these isolates that would support the differential detection of the tcdB gene product by our assay reagents [24]. We also note that a separate ultrasensitive assay (using different toxin B detection reagents) also detected a similar phenomenon in 1 clinical sample (high concentration of toxin A but toxin B concentration below their clinical cutoff) [25]. Finally, while we find it notable that the A:B ratios were consistent in both in vivo and in vitro contexts, we acknowledge that the clinical relevance of the toxin A:B ratio is not clear, given that clinical presentation (in humans and in mice) did not obviously correlate with the A:B ratio.
Variation in the C. difficile genome is extensive, with new genetic changes being discovered continuously, and the regulation of toxin gene expression is extremely complex [26]. Our ribotyping analysis confirmed that the observed pattern of production of toxin A>>B is possible in a diverse set of isolates, and our data show that these isolates maintain the A>>B phenotype both in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, the frequency of recovery of A>>B isolates in patients with CDI and C. difficile colonization in our study indicates that this phenotype is reasonably common, and that it simply has been overlooked previously due to the lack of technologies able to effectively quantify both toxins A and B in clinical and in vitro samples. Our novel data suggest that diagnostic methods that detect the toxin B protein alone may be inadequate to reliably exclude CDI. Our findings also draw into question the prudence of developing therapies that focus solely on neutralizing toxin B. While current molecular tests will detect these A>>B strains, with the advent of ultrasensitive toxin immunoassays, it is important that toxin A detection (and not only toxin B detection) be prioritized.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at Clinical Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
Notes
Author contributions. Q. L., N. R. P., and X. C. contributed equally to this work. N. R. P., C. P. K., and X. C. conceptualized the study and acquired funding. Q. L., A. B., A. L., H. X., L. G., D. N. G., K. W. G., A. J. G.-L., M. Z., L. S., and D. C. D. conducted the laboratory tests and data collection. Q. L., X. C., N. R. P., and C. P. K. wrote the original manuscript. All authors critically commented on the manuscript and approved the final version.
Acknowledgments. The authors thank M. Jahangir Alam, Khurshida Begum, Bradley Endres, and Chris Lancaster at the University of Houston for assistance with the Clostridioides difficile ribotyping assay and colleagues Christine Cuddemi, Christine Geer, and Kaitlyn Daugherty for assistance with sample and data collections.
Financial support. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant number 1R01AI116596-01 to N. R. P. and C. P. K.), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (grant number T32 DK 07760 to C. P. K.), Institut Merieux (funding to N. R. P. and C. P. K.), the Irving W. and Charlotte F. Rabb Award (to X. C.), and the China Scholarship Council (scholarship to Q. L.). Simoa assays were performed by Quanterix and by bioMerieux.
Potential conflicts of interest. D. C. D., M. Z., and L. S. are employees and stock holders of Quanterix Corporation, which sells Simoa kits, instrumentation, and services. C. P. K. has acted as a paid consultant to Artugen, Facile Therapeutics, First Light Biosciences, Finch, Matrivax, Merck, Seres Health, and Vedanta, outside of this study, and has received grant support from Merck. N. R. P. has acted as a paid speaker for Singulex. K. W. G. has received grant support from Merck. X. C. has acted as a paid consultant to Artugen and received grant support from Merck. A. B. and A. L. are employees of bioMérieux. D. N. G. reports personal fees from Merck, Rebiotix, Ferring, Actelion, Summit, DaVolterra, Pfizer, MGB Biopharma, Sanofi Pasteur, and Medpace, all outside the submitted work, and has been issued a patent for Treatment and Prevention of Clostridioides difficile Infection. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
- 1. Burke KE, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile infection: a worldwide disease. Gut Liver 2014; 8:1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Leffler DA, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1539–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kuehne SA, Cartman ST, Minton NP. Both toxin A and toxin B are important in Clostridium difficile infection. Gut Microbes 2011; 2:252–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Borriello SP, Wren BW, Hyde S, et al. Molecular, immunological, and biological characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun 1992; 60:4192–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Drudy D, Fanning S, Kyne L. Toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile. Int J Infect Dis 2007; 11:5–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Freeman J, Bauer MP, Baines SD, et al. The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23:529–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kuehne SA, Cartman ST, Heap JT, Kelly ML, Cockayne A, Minton NP. The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile infection. Nature 2010; 467:711–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cohen SH, Tang YJ, Hansen B, Silva J Jr. Isolation of a toxin B-deficient mutant strain of Clostridium difficile in a case of recurrent C. difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26:410–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cohen SH, Tang YJ, Silva J Jr. Analysis of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile strains. J Infect Dis 2000; 181:659–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Monot M, Eckert C, Lemire A, et al. Clostridium difficile: new insights into the evolution of the pathogenicity locus. Sci Rep 2015; 5:15023;1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Song L, Zhao M, Duffy DC, et al. Development and validation of digital ELISAs for ultrasensitive detection and quantification of C. difficile toxins in stool. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53(10):3204–3212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Pollock NR, Banz A, Chen X, et al. Comparison of C. difficile stool toxin concentrations in adults with symptomatic infection and asymptomatic carriage using an ultrasensitive quantitative immunoassay. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 68:78–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhang T, Lin Q-Y, Fei J-X, et al. Clostridium difficile infection worsen outcome of hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Sci Rep 2016; 6:29761;1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sambol SP, Merrigan MM, Lyerly D, Gerding DN, Johnson S. Toxin gene analysis of a variant strain of Clostridium difficile that causes human clinical disease. Infect Immun 2000; 68:5480–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lemee L, Dhalluin A, Testelin S, et al. Multiplex PCR targeting tpi (triose phosphate isomerase), tcdA (Toxin A), and tcdB (Toxin B) genes for toxigenic culture of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42:5710–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gumerlock PH, Tang YJ, Meyers FJ, Silva J Jr. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the specific and direct detection of Clostridium difficile in human feces. Rev Infect Dis 1991; 13:1053–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chen X, Katchar K, Goldsmith JD, et al. A mouse model of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology 2008; 135:1984–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Alam MJ, Anu A, Walk ST, Garey KW. Investigation of potentially pathogenic Clostridium difficile contamination in household environs. Anaerobe 2014; 27:31–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Martinson JN, Broadaway S, Lohman E, et al. Evaluation of portability and cost of a fluorescent PCR ribotyping protocol for Clostridium difficile epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53:1192–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Voth DE, Ballard JD. Clostridium difficile toxins: mechanism of action and role in disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005; 18:247–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kuehne SA, Collery MM, Kelly ML, Cartman ST, Cockayne A, Minton NP. Importance of toxin A, toxin B, and CDT in virulence of an epidemic Clostridium difficile strain. J Infect Dis 2014; 209:83–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lyerly DM, Saum KE, MacDonald DK, Wilkins TD. Effects of Clostridium difficile toxins given intragastrically to animals. Infect Immun 1985; 47:349–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lyras D, O’Connor JR, Howarth PM, et al. Toxin B is essential for virulence of Clostridium difficile. Nature 2009; 458:1176–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Pollock NR, Song L, Zhao M, et al. Differential immunodetection of toxin B from highly virulent Clostridium difficile BI/NAP-1/027. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53:1705–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Katzenbach P, Dave G, Mukherjee A, et al. 1093. Single molecule counting technology for ultrasensitive quantification of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018; 5(Suppl 1):S327. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Chandrasekaran R, Lacy DB. The role of toxins in Clostridium difficile infection. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2017; 41:723–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.