Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Jun 10;15(6):e0234493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234493

Pharmacological inhibition of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 inhibits and reverses experimental autoimmune encephalitis in rodents

Anne Skøttrup Mørkholt 1, Michal Krystian Oklinski 1, Agnete Larsen 2, Robert Bockermann 3, Shohreh Issazadeh-Navikas 3, Jette Goller Kloth Nieland 4, Tae-Hwan Kwon 5, Angelique Corthals 6, Søren Nielsen 1,4, John Dirk Vestergaard Nieland 1,*
Editor: Fulvio D’Acquisto7
PMCID: PMC7286491  PMID: 32520953

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by demyelination and inflammation. Dysregulated lipid metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction are hypothesized to play a key role in MS. Carnitine Palmitoyl Transferase 1 (CPT1) is a rate-limiting enzyme for beta-oxidation of fatty acids in mitochondria. The therapeutic effect of pharmacological CPT1 inhibition with etomoxir was investigated in rodent models of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein- and myelin basic protein-induced experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE). Mice receiving etomoxir showed lower clinical score compared to placebo, however this was not significant. Rats receiving etomoxir revealed significantly lower clinical score and lower body weight compared to placebo group. When comparing etomoxir with interferon-β (IFN-β), IFN-β had no significant therapeutic effects, whereas etomoxir treatment starting at day 1 and 5 significantly improved the clinical scores compared to the IFN-β and the placebo group. Immunohistochemistry and image assessments of brain sections from rats with EAE showed higher myelination intensity and decreased expression of CPT1A in etomoxir-treated rats compared to placebo group. Moreover, etomoxir mediated increased interleukin-4 production and decreased interleukin-17α production in activated T cells. In conclusion, CPT1 is a key protein in the pathogenesis of EAE and MS and a crucial therapeutic target for the treatment.

Introduction

One of the key functions of lipids in the CNS is to build and maintain the myelin sheath on the axons of neurons, as well as to facilitate protein transfer from oligodendrocytes to the myelin sheaths [1,2]. It is well established that metabolism of lipids is significantly altered in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients [37]. Previous studies that examined the lipid levels of MS, bipolar disorder or schizophrenia patients demonstrated a significant reduction in the mono-unsaturated and saturated fatty acids lipid concentrations, specifically of 16:1 (palmitate) and 18:1 lipids (oleate lipids) [810]. Although polyunsaturated fatty acid levels were not examined in these studies, the shift in lipid levels was likely due to changes in metabolic pathways, such as switch in the balance between the metabolism of glucose and of lipids. This metabolic redirection, when occurring in the brain, leads to the reduced levels of poly- and mono-unsaturated and saturated fatty acids in the myelin sheath and cerebral spinal fluid. Moreover, cholesterol levels in the body are changed and correlate with MS progression [5,6]. Evidence supporting this pathogenesis is shown by positron emission tomography analyses of MS lesions which reveal a greatly reduced glucose metabolism [7,11].

In addition to lower levels of constitutional lipids, an upregulation of enzymes involved in lipid metabolism has been identified in MS lesions. One of the most significant enzymes in the metabolism of lipids is carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1A (CPT1A), which is abundantly expressed in the brain and most organs where it catalyzes the rate-limiting step in beta-oxidation. CPT1 is localized at the outer mitochondrial membrane, where it couples an acyl-carnitine group with lipids, and facilitates transport across the outer mitochondrial membrane. After transport of acyl-carnitine, CPT2 localized at the inner mitochondrial membrane removes the carnitine group from the lipid molecule which enables its degradation via beta-oxidation. Biological systems switch their metabolism from glucose to lipid, i.e. enhanced catabolism of lipids, under locally occurring hypoxic stress. This happens in order to prevent overproduction of lactate and avoid the associated toxicity. Increased catabolism of lipids under situations of stress induces local production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [12], thereby attracting and activating the immune system. Moreover, prolonged lipid catabolism activated under hypoxia can result in mitochondrial dysfunction.

In the MS lesions, CPT1A expression is greatly increased [13], which correlates with a decrease in lipid concentration in the myelin sheath due to an increased beta-oxidation. Loss of lipids in the myelin sheath results in a functional impairment, manifested by increasing signaling time and an escalation in energy expenditure. In addition, lipids provide a protective function for the proteins expressed in the myelin sheath. If the lipids of the myelin sheath are no longer functional or present at all, proteins in myelin such as myelin basic protein (MBP) have some arginine’s converted to citrulline by peptidyl arginine deiminase, thereby making them immunogenic [1417]. Moreover, under hypoxic conditions lipid metabolism is associated with increased prostaglandin production [12,18], and enhanced chemotaxis of immune cells to the exposed myelin sheath proteins.

Based on these mechanisms, we therefore hypothesize that blockage of CPT1A function may result in both therapeutic and preventative effects in the progression of MS. To examine this hypothesis, we studied the efficacy of the CPT1 blocker etomoxir for the treatment of advanced experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) in rodents [19]. The changes of MBP, CPT1A and ferritin expression were examined in the EAE rat model. Moreover, the effect of etomoxir on inflammation and production of cytokines were examined.

Materials and methods

Animals

All animal experiments were conducted according to NIH guidelines and were approved by the Danish National Committee for Ethics in Animal Experimentation (2007/561-1364 and 2015-15-0201-00647). Six-week-old female C57BL/6 mice (n = 42) were bred and kept at conventional animal facilities at the University of Copenhagen. Two-month-old female Lewis rats (n = 42 and n = 55) were bred and kept at conventional animal facilities at the University of Aarhus. All animals were maintained under standardized conditions of light and temperature, with a 12-h day/night cycle and food and water ad libitum. During the progression of EAE leading to motor disabilities, animals had water in a petri dish and soaked chow for easy intake to ensure sufficient liquid and nutrients intake.

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis immunization

C57BL/6 mice were immunized subcutaneously (s.c.) in the flank with 200 μg of MOG35–55 peptide emulsified in complete Freund´s adjuvant (CFA) containing 0.1 mg Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Becton Dickinson) along with an intraperitoneal injection of 200 ng pertussis toxin (List Biological Laboratories Inc.) on the day of immunization and two days later. In Lewis rats, EAE was induced by intradermal injection at the base of the tail with an emulsion consisting of 100 μg MBP from guinea pig (Sigma-Aldrich) suspended in CFA with the addition of 0.2 mg of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (Becton Dickinson). The animals were monitored daily, weighed and clinically scored according to Table 1. No animals were permitted to lose more than 20% body weight (compared to the starting point of EAE immunization) and to go beyond score 4 [20].

Table 1. Clinical scoring of animals.

Disease score Clinical symptoms of EAE
0 No clinical signs of EAE
1 Limp tail
2 Paresis of one or two hind limbs
3 Unilateral hind leg paralysis
4 Bilateral hind leg paralysis
5 Bilateral hind leg paralysis and incontinence or moribund

Clinical assessment of animals induced with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE).

Drug administration

At indicated time points (Fig 1), animals were treated daily s.c. either with 1 mg/kg etomoxir (Meta-IQ ApS) diluted in non-sterile olive oil at 37 °C or 200,000 IU IFN-β (Extavia, Aalborg University Hospital) every other day. The placebo groups received daily injections with saline or olive oil (non-sterile). Etomoxir is a potent inhibitor of CPT1, which blocks mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation and exerts its effects on both the adaptive and innate immune response as well as mobilizing anti-inflammatory effects [21,22].

Fig 1. Timeline of the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) models in mice and rats.

Fig 1

Mice were injected with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)35-55 and at day 10–12 animals started showing EAE symptoms. Therefore, treatment with etomoxir (1 mg/kg/day s.c., n = 21) or placebo (n = 21) was initiated at day 10 (a). Rats were injected with myelin basic protein (MBP) and daily treatment of etomoxir (1 mg/kg/day s.c., n = 16) or placebo (n = 26) was started at day 7 (b). Rats were injected with MBP and treated with etomoxir (1 mg/kg/day s.c.) at day 1 (n = 10) or day 5 (n = 10), interferon-β (IFN-β) (200,000 IU, every other day, s.c.) day 1 (n = 10) or day 5 (n = 10), or placebo (n = 10) onwards after induction of EAE (c). All studies were terminated when animals showed a disease score of > 4 or > 20% weight loss.

Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescent staining

Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and intracardiac perfusion with 0.01M PBS was followed by fixation with 4% PFA/PBS (pH 7.4). The brains were isolated and placed for storage in 4% PFA/PBS at 4 °C. Brains were cut into 2 mm thick coronal sections and subjected for washing procedure in cold running tap water for 4 h and in PBS for following five days at 4 °C with daily exchange of fresh PBS. Sections were dehydrated in ethanol, cleared overnight in xylene and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were cut into 2 μm thick sections on a rotary microtome (Leica Microsystems), dewaxed, rehydrated and underwent either peroxidase or fluorescent immunolabeling. Sections were stained for MBP mouse antibody (1:100, ab62631, Abcam) in connection with goat anti-mouse (1:200, P0447, Dako) horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and ferritin rabbit antibody (1:500, ab81444, Abcam) in connection with anti-rabbit antibody (1:200, P0448, Dako) horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody accordingly to the procedure described previously [23]. Bright field microscopy was carried out using DM5500B microscope (Leica). Immunofluorescence labeling of CPT1A was performed with CPT1A primary mouse antibody (1:100, ab128568, Abcam) and anti-mouse Alexa fluor 488 secondary antibody (1:200, A21202, Thermo Fisher). TO-PRO-3 Iodide (1:1000, T3605, Thermo Fisher) was used as the nuclear counterstain. Whereas, MBP quantification was performed with antibody mentioned earlier in connection with anti-mouse Alexa fluor 555 secondary antibody (1:200, A-21422, Thermo Fisher). Laser scanning on confocal microscopy was carried out (Leica DMI6000CS, Wetzlar, Germany).

Intensity quantification of immunofluorescent labeling

Images designated for fluorescent labeling intensity quantification were taken under the resolution of 1024 x 1024 pixels. Total of 12 images (six from brainstem and six from cerebellum) from coronal sections at approximately Bergma-13, in possibly similar locations, were acquired from each etomoxir-treated animal (n = 3) and placebo-treated animal (n = 3). All other microscopy settings, such as laser power, gain, offset, contrast, gamma values intensity and pinhole size were kept identical during the whole acquisition process. Single channel gray scale images were used to assess the integrated density value of CPT1A- and MBP-labeled fluorescent sections in ImageJ software after setting a constant threshold level covering desired labeling.

Intracellular cytokine analysis

Experiments involving human blood samples were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent forms of these healthy donors have been obtained. The study and use of human blood material was approved by Ethical Committee for Region North Denmark (N-20150073). HPBL were isolated, cultured and stained in accordance with Mørkholt et al. [21]. Cells were stained with FITC mouse anti-human IFN-γ (561057, BD Biosciences), IL-8 (340509, BD Biosciences) or TNF-α (562082, BD Biosciences), and PE mouse anti-human IL-4 (562046, BD Biosciences) or IL-17α antibodies (560438, BD Bioscience). Cells were analyzed by a FACS flow cytometer (Beckmann Coulter).

Applied statistics

All statistics were performed using Graph Pad Prism software. Unpaired t tests and ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparisons post hoc test were used to analyze clinical EAE parameters. Chi-square and Fisher´s exact tests were used to analyze differences in number of animals showing normal behavioral clinical scores. Two-way ANOVA with either Tukey´s or Sidak´s multiple comparisons post hoc tests was used to compare clinical score and weight data over time between the different treatment groups, as well as to compare flow cytometric expression of cytokines in treated and untreated cells. Expression of CPT1A and MBP was evaluated by an unpaired t test. Acquired data are presented as mean ± SEM. P values of 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Blockage of CPT1 has therapeutic effects in rodent models of EAE

CPT1A is upregulated in the brain lesions of MS patients [13]. As CPT1 is a rate-limiting step in mitochondrial lipid metabolism of fatty acid beta-oxidation, we tested if blocking of CPT1 with etomoxir (selectively blockage of CPT1 including CPT1A) is effective in the treatment of EAE progression by reversing functional deficits. EAE was induced by immunization of C57BL/6 mice (n = 42) and Lewis rats (n = 42 and n = 55) with the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)35-55 peptide and MBP respectively, as described in methods. Ten to twelve days after immunization, the C57BL/6 mice showed signs of movement disturbances of the tail and/or hind legs. At this time point (day 10), mice were treated with etomoxir in non-sterile olive oil or with the placebo (pure non-sterile olive oil) (Fig 1a).

The mice were daily tested for body weight changes and clinical disease scores. After two weeks of treatment (day 24), the animal study was terminated and the remaining mice were sacrificed. Five days after the first injection (day 15), the overall mean clinical scores improved in the etomoxir-treated mice (Fig 2a). There were no significant differences in body weight between place and etomoxir-treated mice (Fig 2b). The classical EAE parameters showed that mice treated with etomoxir revealed lower mean maximum EAE score, later mean day of disease onset and lower disease incidence compared to the placebo group (Fig 2c). Etomoxir treatment showed a therapeutic effect as 47.6% of mice had normal behavioral scores at day 24 compared to 28.6% in the placebo group (Fig 2c).

Fig 2. Blockage of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1A (CPT1A) by etomoxir in a mice experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model.

Fig 2

Two weeks of treatment with etomoxir (1 mg/kg/day s.c., n = 21) compared to placebo (n = 21) treatment of mice with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)35-55-induced EAE. From day 15, etomoxir treatment revealed lower clinical score compared to animals receiving placebo (a). The average body weight was higher in the mice subjected to etomoxir treatment as compared to placebo-treated animals (b). Statistically significant differences between etomoxir and placebo mice were not observed for maximum disease score, disease onset, incidence (c). Data are represented as mean ± SEM.

The therapeutic efficacy of the treatment was also tested in Lewis rat EAE model using MBP. Normally, disease onset is seen at day 8 to 9 after disease induction and progresses rapidly. Therefore, treatment of the rats with etomoxir or placebo was started at day 7 (Fig 1b) [24]. Moreover, rats receiving etomoxir exhibited significantly lower disease scores at day 11 compared to the rats receiving placebo (p = 0.0013; two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post test) (Fig 3a). Placebo-treated rats showed significantly decreased body weight compared to the etomoxir-treated rats (day 9 p = 0.0259; day 10 p = 0.0029; day 11 p = 0.0006; two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post test) (Fig 3b). Additionally, etomoxir-treated rats showed significant lower mean maximum EAE score (p = 0.0236; unpaired t test) and later mean day of onset (p = 0.0081; upaired t test) compared to the placebo group (Fig 3c). At day 11, none of the placebo-treated rats showed a normal behavioral score and 73% had already been sacrificed due to a disease score of 4. In contrast, 25% of the etomoxir-treated rats had normal behavioral scores, which were highly significant compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0074; chi-square) (Fig 3c).

Fig 3. Blockage of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1A (CPT1A) by etomoxir in a rat experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model.

Fig 3

Rats were subjected to myelin basic protein (MBP)-induced EAE and treated either with etomoxir (1 mg/kg/day s.c., n = 16.) or placebo (n = 26). Etomoxir-treated rats exhibited significantly lower disease scores at day 11 compared to rats receiving placebo analyzed by a two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons post hoc tests (a). The results from the two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons post hoc test showed significantly higher body weight in the rats subjected to etomoxir treatment as compared to placebo-treated animals at day 9, 10 and 11 (b). Statistically significant differences between etomoxir and placebo treated rats were observed for maximum disease score and disease onset (unpaired t test) (c). Etomoxir treatment resulted in 25% of the rats showing normal behavioral scores compared to 0% after placebo treatment analyzed by a Fisher´s exact test (c). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Number of asterisks indicates the level of statistical significance (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

Superior therapeutic effects produced by CPT1 inhibition compared to IFN-β in a rodent model of EAE

CPT1 blockage by etomoxir was compared to interferon-β (IFN-β), as this is one of the current first-line treatments of MS. Since it has been shown that IFN-β exhibits clinical efficacy in a rat EAE model when given early, we compared the two pharmacological treatment regimens when given at day 1 or day 5 after induction of disease (Fig 1c) [25]. This model produced very severe outcomes, since most of the placebo and IFN-β-treated rats were sacrificed at day 11 due to high disease scores. IFN-β treatment started at day 1 and 5 did not produce therapeutic effects, which was the same in the placebo-treated group. In contrast, etomoxir treatment demonstrated therapeutic effects at day 10 when initiated at day 1 compared to placebo, IFN-β at day 1 and day 5 (placebo p = 0.0347; IFN-β at day 1 p<0.0001; IFN-β at day 5 p = 0.0004; two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post test) (Fig 4a), and when started at day 5 compared to IFN-β at day 1 and day 5 (IFN-β at day 1 p = 0.0004; IFN-β at day 5 p = 0.0046; two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post test) (Fig 4a). Additionally, at the last day rats treated with etomoxir at day 1 exhibited lower disease scores compared to animals receiving placebo (p = 0.0133), IFN-β at day 1 (p = 0.0004) and IFN-β at day 5 (p = 0.0133) (Fig 4a). Rats started treatment with etomoxir at day 5 showed significantly lower disease score compared to IFN-β at day 1 (p = 0.0133; two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post test) (Fig 4a). Etomoxir, however, did not significantly affect the body weight over time (Fig 4b). Moreover, etomoxir treatment initiated at day 1 revealed a significant lower mean maximum EAE score compared to IFN-β at day 1 (p = 0.0102; one-way ANOVA with Tukey´s post test) (Fig 4c).

Fig 4. Comparing the effects of etomoxir and interferon-β (IFN-β) in a rat experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model.

Fig 4

Rats were subjected to myelin basic protein (MBP)-induced EAE and treated either with etomoxir (1 mg/kg/day s.c.) at day 1 (n = 10) or day 5 (n = 10), IFN-β (200,000 IU s.c.) every other day from day 1 (n = 10) or day 5 (n = 10), or placebo (n = 10) onwards after EAE induction. Results from the RM two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test showed that rats receiving etomoxir at day 1 and day 5 exhibited significantly lower disease scores compared to IFN-β day 1, IFN-β day 5 and placebo at day 10 and 11 (a). The average body weight was higher in etomoxir-treated rats compared to IFN-β-treated animals, though this was not significant (b). Statistically significant difference between etomoxir and IFN-β both initiated at day 1 was observed for maximum disease score (unpaired t test) (c). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Number of asterisks indicates the level of statistical significance (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Etomoxir decreases CPT1A expression and improves myelination and ferritin deposits

Immunohistochemistry provided additional evidence for the therapeutic effect of etomoxir treatment compared to the placebo group in the rat EAE model. Etomoxir-treated rats had markedly increased intensity of MBP labeling with no evident pathological lesions (Fig 5a–5d), particularly pronounced in the cerebellum (Fig 5b–5d) when compared with placebo-treated rats (Fig 5e–5h). In the cerebellum of etomoxir-treated rats, MBP labeling in the white matter was more intense compared with placebo-receiving rats (Fig 5b and 5f). Similarly, in the etomoxir group, more intense MBP labeling was noted in granular and molecular cerebellar layers in the form of fibrous bundles protruding from the white matter (Fig 5c and 5d). Whereas, in the placebo group, characteristic MBP-labeled fibrous bundles were sparse and labeling pattern was more dotted with barely noticeable threadlike structure (Fig 5g and 5h). In the brainstem, differences in MBP labeling intensity were less evident than that of cerebellum. Nevertheless, in the etomoxir-treated group, MBP-labeled fibrous structures laterally protruding from the nucleus raphe magnus and the medial longitudinal fascicle (Fig 5a) were labeled more intensely than in the placebo group (Fig 5e).

Fig 5. Immunoperoxidase microscopy of myelin basic protein (MBP) in coronal brainstem and cerebellum of etomoxir-treated rats (a-d) and placebo rats (e-h).

Fig 5

The etomoxir-treated group shown to possess higher MBP-labeling in the brainstem visualized as fibrous structures laterally protruding from nucleus raphe magnus and medial longitudinal fascicle compared to the group receiving placebo (a and e). Likewise, in the cerebellar white matter of etomoxir-treated rats, MBP-labeling was markedly more intense compared with placebo-receiving rats (b and f). MBP axons ensheathing in etomoxir-treated rats was labeled in the form of fibrous bundles in the cerebellar white matter, granular and molecular cerebellar layers, whereas in placebo animals MBP-labeled fibrous bundles were sparse and labeling pattern was more (c,d,g and h).

Immunofluorescent signal intensity of CPT1A in paraffin-embedded brain sections from etomoxir-treated rats was significantly lower in both brainstem (p = 0.0083; unpaired t-test) and cerebellum (p = 0.0237; unpaired t test) compared to the placebo group (Fig 6a–6c), confirming the downregulation of CPT1 in etomoxir-treated group. These data showed that blocking CPT1, which specifically blocks the metabolism of lipids, produced therapeutic effects in the animal models of MS. Consequently, fluorescent MBP quantification have confirmed qualitative peroxidase-labeling (Fig 7a and 7b) and showed significantly higher level of MBP-labeling in the cerebellum (p = 0.0192; unpaired t test) with matching trend in the brainstem (Fig 7c).

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Immunofluorescent images of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1A (CPT1A) in placebo-receiving rats (n = 3) (a) and etomoxir-treated rats (n = 3) (b). CPT1A signal intensity was significantly lower in both cerebellum and brainstem of the etomoxir-treated animals compared to the placebo-treated animals illustrating the blocking effect of etomoxir treatment (c). CPT1A was labeled with green and TO-PRO-3 was used as nuclei counterstain overlaid with blue color. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Number of asterisks indicates the level of statistical significance (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

Fig 7.

Fig 7

Immunofluorescent images of myelin basic protein (MBP)-labeling in the brainstem of placebo-receiving rats (n = 3) (a) and etomoxir-treated rats (n = 3) (b). MPB-labeling was significantly higher in the cerebellum of etomoxir-treated rats and represented similar tendency in the brainstem, though this was not statistical significantly changed (c). MBP was visualized with Alexa fluor 555 antibody and overlaid with magenta color, whereas nuclear counterstain TO-PRO-3 was overlaid with cyan. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Number of asterisks indicates the level of statistical significance (*p < 0.05).

Rats receiving etomoxir showed reduced ferritin labeling in the brainstem and cerebellum when compared to the placebo group (Fig 8a–8d). In the cerebellum and brainstem of etomoxir-treated rats, ferritin labeling was noticed mostly around blood vessels (Fig 8a and 8c), whereas in the placebo group labeling was readably more intense and noticed also around and inside the cells (presumably neurons) (Fig 8b and 8d).

Fig 8. Immunoperoxidase staining of ferritin in cerebellum and brainstem from etomoxir-treated rats and placebo-receiving rats.

Fig 8

Rats receiving etomoxir showed reduced ferritin labeling in both brainstem (a) and cerebellum (c) when compared to the placebo group, respectively (b and d). In the placebo group vastly more intense labeling was noticed around blood vessels and noticed also around and inside the cells (presumably neurons) (b and d).

Additionally, MBP fluorescent labeling together with TO-PRO-3 nuclei stain was used to illustrate immune cell infiltration. Among sections from etomoxir-treated rats cell aggregations with readably decreased MBP-labeling surrounding them had not been encountered (Fig 9a), whereas in the sections from placebo-receiving rats described cellular aggregates that were encountered especially in the brainstem (Fig 9b and 9c).

Fig 9. Myelin basic protein (MBP) fluorescent labeling together with TO-PRO-3 nuclei stain illustrating immune cell infiltration in etomoxir-treated rats (n = 3) and placebo-receiving rats (n = 3).

Fig 9

In the sections from placebo-receiving rats, TO-PRO-3-labeled cellular aggregates were encountered especially in the brainstem (indicated by arrows in b and c) and surrounded with decreased level of MBP-labeling. There were very spars cell aggregations in the sections from etomoxir-treated rats (a). MBP was visualized with Alexa fluor 555 antibody and overlaid with magenta color, whereas nuclear counterstain TO-PRO-3 was overlaid with cyan.

Decreased IFN-γ and IL-17α expression in activated T cells after etomoxir treatment

In MS, the pro-inflammatory immune response is associated with disease pathogenesis [2628], therefore the effect of etomoxir on the inflammatory response was also investigated. Human peripheral blood lymphocytes were stimulated with staphylococcus enterotoxin B (SEB) for 48 h in the presence or absence of 100 μM etomoxir. After incubation, the cytokine expression was measured by intracellular flow cytometry. Etomoxir blocked the production of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (58%), interleukin-8 (IL-8) (11%), interleukin-17α (IL-17α) (64%) and the tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (55%). A small increase of interleukin-4 (IL-4) (27%) production was observed. The T cell response was directed from a Th1, Th17α response to a Th2 type T cell response. Etomoxir also mediated significantly increase in IL-4 production and decrease in IL-17α production (IL-4 p = 0.0065; IL-17α p = 0.0102; two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post test) (Fig 10).

Fig 10. Intracellular cytokine analysis of etomoxir-treated Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB)-stimulated human peripheral blood lymphocytes.

Fig 10

Etomoxir revealed the lower percentage of positive cells for interferon-γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-17α (IL-17α), but induced increased percent positive cells for interleukin-8 (IL-8) and interleukin (IL-4). Results were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA with a Tukey multiple comparison post hoc tests. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Number of asterisks indicates the level of statistical significance (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

Discussion

For a long time MS has been regarded as an autoimmune disease, where the immune system has been proposed as the primary cause of the disease. Most treatment strategies have been focused solely on the modulation of the inflammatory component of the disease. Thus far, these treatments have been successful in suppressing or delaying relapsing episodes in relapsing-remitting MS and primary-relapsing MS. However, these interventions have not brought an obvious therapeutic effect on disease progression, particularly for the treatment of primary-progressive MS and secondary-progressive MS.

Consistent with the results demonstrated by Lieury et al. [13], we have found that CPT1A is upregulated in MS and EAE lesions. Compared to the normal healthy brain, the mean CPT1A expression is 179% in active MS plaque, 140% in chronic active plaque and 124% in chronic plaque (NCBI Geo Profiles). Moreover, the key role of CPT1A in MS is supported by studies regarding CPT1A mutations in humans. Two types of loss-of-function mutation in CPT1A, which inhibits the activity of the enzyme, have been identified in humans (Hutterite and Inuit populations) [2931]. Common for both populations is highly reduced MS frequency compared to the Canadian population [32,33]. A study with mice having the CPT1A mutation mimicking the Inuit mutation is supporting this key role of CPT1a in the development of EAE, since these mice were resistant to EAE development [34].

Approximately 70% of brain tissue is comprised of lipids and thereby lipids are one of the most important components of the brain. Lipids constitute the myelin sheath, which is important for efficient transmission of signals through neurons with high speed and low energy. The half-life of these myelin lipids is approximately three days [35]. This replacement occurs efficiently in healthy brain tissues through maintenance of high lipid levels by the oligodendrocytes. In MS, however, CPT1A is upregulated, leading to lipid catabolism through accelerated beta-oxidation, as described by Lieury et al. [13]. This finding was further confirmed by evidence of decreased lipid levels in association with disease progression [3,3638]. The loss of lipids in myelin exposes a citrullinated MBP (deamination of arginine to citrulline), which, in turns, increases the inflammatory and immune responses (both B and T cells) due to PGE2 production [1417,39]. Thus, the neurites are slowly stripped from the protective myelin sheath. This inflammatory response in EAE can be blocked by etomoxir [40].

With conditions of stress (physical, pathological, psychological or immunological) follows a state of hypoxia in the brain, which causes the metabolism to shift locally from a glucose-based to a lipid-based metabolism. This will have an effect on the balance in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) network [3]. Additionally, due to favored lipid metabolism the insulin receptor will become insensitive, furthering the lipid metabolism [41]. This process will particularly have an effect on the CNS as lipids play an important role in signal propagation and minimizing energy expenditure. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis will be hyper-activated and stimulating an immune response at the site of lipid metabolism, resulting in an immune attack on the myelin sheath proteins and oligodendrocytes [42,43]. Therefore, by blocking CPT1 with etomoxir, the inflammatory response will be down-regulated and the lipid metabolism will be blocked resulting in restoration of glucose metabolism, increased insulin sensitivity, and restoration of the PPAR balance and HPA axis.

We hypothesized that the optimal treatment regimen for MS would be to block the runaway lipid catabolism, thereby maintaining or increasing lipid levels in the brain and brainstem. More lipids can then be used by oligodendrocytes to restore the altered lipidation of the myelin sheaths, restoring neuronal functions. As lipids are important in both building the myelin sheath and the activation of memory B and T cells, the inhibition of lipid catabolism blocks memory and inflammatory immune responses, leaving the regulatory immune response intact.

We demonstrated that inhibition of lipid catabolism by blocking CPT1 in animal models of EAE reverses disease progression (Figs 2, 3 and 4). In addition, comparison of CPT1A labeling fluorescent signal intensity in brain sections of EAE-induced rats resulted in significantly lower signal intensity in the etomoxir-treated rats versus the placebo group, thus confirming downregulated CPT1 levels after etomoxir treatment (Fig 6). Significant downregulation of CPT1A had occurred together with the markedly higher intensity of MPB labeling in cerebellum and brainstem (Fig 7). Consequently, improved MPB labeling in the cerebellum of etomoxir-treated rats (Fig 5) corresponded well with their lower clinical scores. Inhibition of CPT1 demonstrated effect on the ferritin levels, visualized by reduction in staining in the etomoxir-treated animals compared to the placebo group (Fig 8). Ferritin signals iron deposits which are a result of mitochondrial dysfunction [44,45]. The decreased brain metabolism together with dysfunctional mitochondria promote an environment for enhances oxidative stress. A study has demonstrated that the severity of EAE correlates with the gene expression of genes involved in oxidative stress, such as HO-1 and NOX2 [34]. Moreover, blocking lipid metabolism by etomoxir decreased the Th1 and Th17 inflammatory responses, which have been shown to be involved in the MS development [2628]. Similarly, our results have shown much lower occurrence of cellular aggregates presumably belonging to immune infiltrates, encircled with increased MBP levels in the brainstem of etomoxir-treated rats (Fig 9). After two weeks of treatment in mice suffering from EAE, 47.6% of the mice had normal behavioral scores (Fig 2c) and in the rat EAE model, 25% of the etomoxir-treated animals had normal behavioral scores when treatment was started at day 7 (Fig 3c). The etomoxir-treated rats exhibited statistically significant lower clinical scores and body weight over time compared to the placebo group (Fig 3a and 3b). Furthermore, etomoxir-treated rats showed significantly later disease onset (13.69 ± 1.54) compared to the placebo group (10.31 ± 0.13). Comparing the treatment efficacy between etomoxir and IFN-β (the first line of medicine given currently to MS patients) showed that IFN-β treatment was ineffective at 1 or 5 days after induction of the disease in animals with EAE, whereas etomoxir had very pronounced efficacy by significantly lowering the clinical scores of the animals compared to animals receiving IFN-β day 1 and 5, and placebo (Fig 4a). Moreover, the maximum EAE score for rats treated with etomoxir initiated day 1 were significantly reduced compared to IFN-β day 1 (Fig 4c).

The overall conclusion from the presented data is that suppression of the enhanced lipid catabolism and beta-oxidation through CPT1A inhibition could provide therapeutic effects against MS. This may be assumed since the EAE model is a state-of-art in vivo animal model of MS. It shows similarities to MS by both clinical and pathological features, and reveal the complex interaction of demyelination, inflammation, axonal loss and gliosis. On the other hand, there are some limitations by using EAE to investigate MS relations such as viruses (e.g. Epstein-Barr virus), psychological and social factors since these cannot be modelled properly in animal models. However, many of the drugs available for MS today have been developed and validated in studies using the EAE model [19].

In conclusion, the proposed metabolic switch from glucose to lipid could provide an explanation to the pathogenesis of MS, based on the data from our EAE experiments where blocking the metabolism of lipids stops disease progression. When the lipidation of the myelin sheath is defective, the blockage of an inflammatory response by common disease modifying drugs such as IFN-β can only slow down the disease progression. Thus our experiments with etomoxir not only provide a new avenue of treatment, but also provide new evidence for a paradigm shift when thinking about the pathophysiology of MS. Our data show that MS should be considered as a systemic disease, where altered lipid metabolism in the myelin sheath plays a primary role, and the immune system is the aggravating factor. Moreover, this approach will provide a new insight into therapeutic approaches for other neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer´s disease and Parkinson´s disease, as well as Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Meta-IQ for providing etomoxir, and animal caretakers at Aarhus University and Copenhagen University Animal Facility.

Data Availability

Data are available in manuscript.

Funding Statement

A grant from Lundbeckfonden, R191-2015-1118, financed the studies. J.G.K.N. and S.N. disclose being employed and have financial interest in Meta-IQ. The funders provided support in the form of the drug Etomoxir used in the animal study as well as know-how on the drug, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.

References

  • 1.El-Husseini A el-D, Bredt DS. Protein palmitoylation: a regulator of neuronal development and function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3: 791–802. 10.1038/nrn940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schneider A. Palmitoylation is a sorting determinant for transport to the myelin membrane. J Cell Sci. 2005;118: 2415–2423. 10.1242/jcs.02365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Corthals AP. Multiple sclerosis is not a disease of the immune system. Q Rev Biol. 2011;86: 287–321. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22384749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bizzozero OA, Sanchez P, Tetzloff SU. Effect of ATP depletion on the palmitoylation of myelin proteolipid protein in young and adult rats. J Neurochem. 1999;72: 2610–2616. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0722610.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weinstock-Guttman B, Zivadinov R, Horakova D, Havrdova E, Qu J, Shyh G, et al. Lipid profiles are associated with lesion formation over 24 months in interferon-β treated patients following the first demyelinating event. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84: 1186–1191. 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weinstock-Guttman B, Zivadinov R, Mahfooz N, Carl E, Drake A, Schneider J, et al. Serum lipid profiles are associated with disability and MRI outcomes in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8: 127 10.1186/1742-2094-8-127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blinkenberg M, Rune K, Jensen CV, Ravnborg M, Kyllingsbæk S, Holm S, et al. Cortical cerebral metabolism correlates with MRI lesion load and cognitive dysfunction in MS. Neurology. 2000;54: 558–64. 10.1212/wnl.54.3.558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Woelk H, Borri P. Lipid and fatty acid composition of myelin purified from normal and MS brains. Eur Neurol. 1973;10: 250–60. 10.1159/000114281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McNamara RK, Rider T, Jandacek R, Tso P. Abnormal fatty acid pattern in the superior temporal gyrus distinguishes bipolar disorder from major depression and schizophrenia and resembles multiple sclerosis. Psychiatry Res. 2014;215: 560–567. 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adibhatla RM, Hatcher JF. Role of lipids in brain injury and diseases. Future Lipidol. 2007;2: 403–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.De Paula Faria D, De Vries EFJ, Sijbesma JWA, Buchpiguel CA, Dierckx RAJO, Copray SCVM. PET imaging of glucose metabolism, neuroinflammation and demyelination in the lysolecithin rat model for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2014;20: 1443–1452. 10.1177/1352458514526941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aberg JA, Demers LM, Romano PJ, Tenser RB. Prostaglandin production in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. J Clin Lab Anal. 1990;4: 246–250. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2391581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lieury A, Chanal M, Androdias G, Reynolds R, Cavagna S, Giraudon P, et al. Tissue remodeling in periplaque regions of multiple sclerosis spinal cord lesions. Glia. 2014;62: 1645–1658. 10.1002/glia.22705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cantaert T, Teitsma C, Tak PP, Baeten D. Presence and role of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in experimental arthritis models. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65: 939–948. 10.1002/art.37839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carrillo-Vico A, Leech MD, Anderton SM. Contribution of myelin autoantigen citrullination to T cell autoaggression in the central nervous system. J Immunol. 2010;184: 2839–2846. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kidd BA, Ho PP, Sharpe O, Zhao X, Tomooka BH, Kanter JL, et al. Epitope spreading to citrullinated antigens in mouse models of autoimmune arthritis and demyelination. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10: 1–12. 10.1186/ar2523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lundberg K, Nijenhuis S, Vossenaar ER, Palmblad K, van Venrooij WJ, Klareskog L, et al. Citrullinated proteins have increased immunogenicity and arthritogenicity and their presence in arthritic joints correlates with disease severity. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7: R458–67. 10.1186/ar1697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moreira LS, Piva B, Gentile LB, Mesquita-Santos FP, D’Avila H, Maya-Monteiro CM, et al. Cytosolic phospholipase A2-driven PGE2 synthesis within unsaturated fatty acids-induced lipid bodies of epithelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta—Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2009;1791: 156–165. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Constantinescu CS, Farooqi N, O’Brien K, Gran B. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a model for multiple sclerosis (MS). Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164: 1079–1106. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01302.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wiskin AE, Davies JH, Wootton SA, Beattie RM. Energy expenditure, nutrition and growth. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96: 567–572. 10.1136/adc.2009.158303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mørkholt AS, Wiborg O, Nieland JGK, Nielsen S, Nieland JD. Blocking of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 potently reduces stress-induced depression in rat highlighting a pivotal role of lipid metabolism. Sci Rep. 2017;7 10.1038/s41598-017-02343-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mørkholt AS, Kastaniegaard K, Trabjerg MS, Gopalasingam G, Niganze W, Larsen A, et al. Identification of brain antigens recognized by autoantibodies in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-induced animals treated with etomoxir or interferon-β. Sci Rep. 2018;8 10.1038/s41598-018-25391-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oklinski MK, Lim JS, Choi HJ, Oklinska P, Skowronski MT, Kwon TH. Immunolocalization of water channel proteins AQP1 and AQP4 in rat spinal cord. J Histochem Cytochem. 2014;62: 598–611. 10.1369/0022155414537495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weissert R. Actively induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in rats. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1304: 161–169. 10.1007/7651_2014_177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Maier K, Kuhnert A V., Taheri N, Sättler MB, Storch MK, Williams SK, et al. Effects of glatiramer acetate and interferon-β on neurodegeneration in a model of multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. Am J Pathol. 2006;169: 1353–1364. 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cannella B, Raine CS. Multiple sclerosis: cytokine receptors on oligodendrocytes predict innate regulation. Ann Neurol. 2004;55: 46–57. 10.1002/ana.10764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tomioka R, Matsui M. Biomarkers for multiple sclerosis. Intern Med. 2014;53: 361–365. 10.2169/internalmedicine.53.1246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Van Der Aa A, Hellings N, Bernard CCA, Raus J, Stinissen P. Functional properties of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-reactive T cells in multiple sclerosis patients and controls. J Neuroimmunol. 2003;137: 164–176. 10.1016/s0165-5728(03)00048-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Prasad C, Johnson JP, Bonnefont JP, Dilling LA, Innes AM, Haworth JC, et al. Hepatic carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 (CPT1 A) deficiency in North American Hutterites (Canadian and American): Evidence for a founder effect and results of a pilot study on a DNA-based newborn screening program. Mol Genet Metab. 2001;73: 55–63. 10.1006/mgme.2001.3149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bennett MJ, Boriack RL, Narayan S, Rutledge SL, Raff ML. Novel mutations in CPT1A define molecular heterogeneity of hepatic carnitine palmitoyltransferase I deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2004;82: 59–63. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Greenberg CR, Dilling LA, Thompson GR, Seargeant LE, Haworth JC, Phillips S, et al. The paradox of the carnitine palmitoyltransferase type Ia P479L variant in Canadian Aboriginal populations. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;96: 201–207. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.12.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ross RT, Nicolle LE, Cheang M. Varicella zoster virus and multiple sclerosis in a hutterite population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48: 1319–1324. 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00046-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Saeedi J, Rieckmann P, Yee I, Tremlett H. Characteristics of multiple sclerosis in aboriginals living in British Columbia, Canada. Mult Scler J. 2012;18: 1239–1243. 10.1177/1352458512436595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mørkholt AS, Trabjerg MS, Krystian M, Oklinski E, Bolther L, Kroese LJ, et al. CPT1A plays a key role in the development and treatment of multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Sci Rep. 2019; 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bizzozero OA, Good LK. Rapid metabolism of fatty acids covalently bound to myelin proteolipid protein. J Biol Chem. 1991;266: 17092–17098. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen CC, Lu F-H, Wu J-S, Chang C-J. Correlation between serum lipid concentrations and psychological distress. Psychiatry Res. 2001;102: 153–162. 10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00231-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gonzalo H, Brieva L, Tatzber F, Jové M, Cacabelos D, Cassanyé A, et al. Lipidome analysis in multiple sclerosis reveals protein lipoxidative damage as a potential pathogenic mechanism. J Neurochem. 2012;123: 622–634. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07934.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Newell MK, Villalobos-Menuey E, Schweitzer SC, Harper ME, Camley RE. Cellular metabolism as a basis for immune privilege. J Immune Based Ther Vaccines. 2006;4: 1–6. 10.1186/1476-8518-4-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Acharya NK, Nagele EP, Han M, Coretti NJ, DeMarshall C, Kosciuk MC, et al. Neuronal PAD4 expression and protein citrullination: Possible role in production of autoantibodies associated with neurodegenerative disease. J Autoimmun. 2012;38: 369–380. 10.1016/j.jaut.2012.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shriver LP, Manchester M. Inhibition of fatty acid metabolism ameliorates disease activity in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep. 2011;1: 6–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Savage DB, Petersen KF, Shulman GI. Disordered lipid metabolism and the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. Physiol Rev. 2007;87: 507–20. 10.1152/physrev.00024.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zunszain PA, Anacker C, Cattaneo A, Carvalho LA, Pariante CM. Glucocorticoids, cytokines and brain abnormalities in depression. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacology Biol Psychiatry. 2011;35: 722–729. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Willner P, Scheel-Krüger J, Belzung C. The neurobiology of depression and antidepressant action. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37: 2331–2371. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Urrutia PJ, Mena NP, Núñez MT. The interplay between iron accumulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation during the execution step of neurodegenerative disorders. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5: 38 10.3389/fphar.2014.00038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yang H, Yang M, Guan H, Liu Z, Zhao S, Takeuchi S, et al. Mitochondrial ferritin in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurosci Res. 2013;77: 1–7. 10.1016/j.neures.2013.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Fulvio D'Acquisto

25 Mar 2020

PONE-D-19-35522

Pharmacological inhibition of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 inhibits and reverses experimental autoimmune encephalitis in rodents

PLOS ONE

Dear Mr Nieland,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by May 09 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Fulvio D'Acquisto, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Financial Disclosure section:

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to

publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: "Meta-IQ, ApS"

a)  Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

b) Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.  

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please respond by return email with an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement and we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Please try to address as many reasonable comments as possible.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors of this study have demonstrated that etomoxir effectively mitigates the loss of myelin and other pro-inflammatory, degenerative processes in brain tissue of mouse and rat models of experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE), which recapitulates many of the same pathological characteristics as MS in humans. Despite this interesting finding, authors show only superficially descriptive data here and there is no mechanistic insights provided as to why this might be happening. They make the argument that inhibition of CPT1A by etomoxir is a primary reason for the therapeutic effect, yet there are no convincing measurements taken here to support that. Specific areas where this study would be strengthened are as follows:

1) Although etomoxir is indeed an irreversible inhibitor of CPT1A, it also has many off-target effects on other lipid metabolism pathways, including activation of PPARs, and some effects on CoA metabolism. These are only some of the known off-target effects of this molecule, there likely are many more. Thus, many experiments are needed to confirm that CPT1A inhibition is the primary MoA for etomoxir in a study such as this. These experiments are not sufficiently performed in this study. Specifically, no measurements of fatty acid oxidation are performed in any cell or tissue from the EAE models to determine if etomoxir is having an effect on this pathway. The immunostaining for CPT1A protein in the brain slices shown here by the authors is essentially meaningless, as this could be driven by multiple players, including the disease pathology. The functional effect of etomoxir on blunting fatty acid oxidation is not confirmed.

2) It is not at all clear, given the experimental design here, which cell type is relevant to the etomoxir effect. Is CPT1A inhibition more important in oligodendrocytes, lymphocytes, macrophages, or all of them? This is not at all clear from this study. Work in cell culture models might be useful to sort this out, or single-cell experiments from the EAE models.

3) Given the numerous off-target effects of etomoxir, an additional experiment that should be considered is to use a targeted CPT1A-deficient mouse line to confirm that CPT1A is mechanistically involved in the progression of EAE. This would greatly strengthen the etomoxir data.

4) Use of ferritin staining as a marker of ‘mitochondrial dysfunction’ is dubious, at best. If fatty acid oxidation is pathologically involved in EAE, then having some indication of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation in the tissues involved in this process is essential here. It is well-known that mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation causes more oxidative stress, and in turn this could lead to degeneration of oligodendrocytes and inflammation, but these lines of investigation have not been followed here, and the use of ferritin as a marker does not address these questions in any meaningful way.

5) More discussion about EAE as a model of MS in humans is much needed here. What are the similarities, and what are the limitations?

Reviewer #2: The article entitled,” Pharmacological Inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 inhibits and reverses experimental autoimmune encephalitis in rodents” by Morkholt et al., describes the mechanism of action of a CPT1 inhibitor in vivo. Overall, experiments performed and data analysis are appropriate, and the manuscript can be published in PLOS One after the authors provide some clarification.

1. Fig 3a and b. The authors indicate that rats that received CPT1 inhibitor etomoxir showed lower clinical scores compared to placebo. However, the results were significant only for day 11 data. Furthermore, there was a significant change in body weight. In fact, compared to the change in body weight, the clinical score was less significant. The authors need to explain this.

2. The respiratory chain is an important aspect of cellular metabolism. Inhibition of CPT1 is affected in all cells in the body. Is there any selectivity with CPT1 inhibitors only to neuronal cells?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 10;15(6):e0234493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234493.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


11 May 2020

PLOS ONE Decision: Revision required

PONE-D-19-35522

Pharmacological inhibition of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 inhibits and reverses experimental autoimmune encephalitis in rodents

Reviewer #1: Authors of this study have demonstrated that etomoxir effectively mitigates the loss of myelin and other pro-inflammatory, degenerative processes in brain tissue of mouse and rat models of experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE), which recapitulates many of the same pathological characteristics as MS in humans. Despite this interesting finding, authors show only superficially descriptive data here and there is no mechanistic insights provided as to why this might be happening. They make the argument that inhibition of CPT1A by etomoxir is a primary reason for the therapeutic effect, yet there are no convincing measurements taken here to support that. Specific areas where this study would be strengthened are as follows:

1) Although etomoxir is indeed an irreversible inhibitor of CPT1A, it also has many off-target effects on other lipid metabolism pathways, including activation of PPARs, and some effects on CoA metabolism. These are only some of the known off-target effects of this molecule, there likely are many more. Thus, many experiments are needed to confirm that CPT1A inhibition is the primary MoA for etomoxir in a study such as this. These experiments are not sufficiently performed in this study. Specifically, no measurements of fatty acid oxidation are performed in any cell or tissue from the EAE models to determine if etomoxir is having an effect on this pathway. The immunostaining for CPT1A protein in the brain slices shown here by the authors is essentially meaningless, as this could be driven by multiple players, including the disease pathology. The functional effect of etomoxir on blunting fatty acid oxidation is not confirmed.

Response: Several studies have shown that etomoxir increases the glucose metabolism and decreases the lipid metabolism in both mice and humans[1–5]. Furthermore, we have measured the glucose levels in serum from EAE mice, which is illustrated in the figure below.

Cpt1a EAE (n=4), WT EAE placebo (n=3) and WT EAE etomoxir (n=3).

2) It is not at all clear, given the experimental design here, which cell type is relevant to the etomoxir effect. Is CPT1A inhibition more important in oligodendrocytes, lymphocytes, macrophages, or all of them? This is not at all clear from this study. Work in cell culture models might be useful to sort this out, or single-cell experiments from the EAE models.

Response: CPT1a is expressed in all cells (except in muscle and adipose tissue). We and others have shown in the past that lymphocytes, macrophages dendritic cells etc. are all affected. In addition, astrocytes have shown to have upregulated CPT1a. The theory is that most cells are affected by the drug (etomoxir) and therefore, change the balance in the body to a more glucose metabolism, resulting in the clinical effect on the disease.

3) Given the numerous off-target effects of etomoxir, an additional experiment that should be considered is to use a targeted CPT1A-deficient mouse line to confirm that CPT1A is mechanistically involved in the progression of EAE. This would greatly strengthen the etomoxir data.

Response: These data have in the meantime been published in Scientific Reports where it has been shown that CPT1a knock down mice are resistant to EAE development[6].

We have now referred to this study in section “Discussion” p. 17 l. 361-363.

4) Use of ferritin staining as a marker of ‘mitochondrial dysfunction’ is dubious, at best. If fatty acid oxidation is pathologically involved in EAE, then having some indication of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation in the tissues involved in this process is essential here. It is well-known that mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation causes more oxidative stress, and in turn this could lead to degeneration of oligodendrocytes and inflammation, but these lines of investigation have not been followed here, and the use of ferritin as a marker does not address these questions in any meaningful way.

Response: Dysfunctional mitochondria and decreased brain metabolism can promote an environment for enhanced oxidative stress. In the manuscript published in meantime, we have demonstrated that EAE severity correlates with the gene expression of proteins involved in oxidative stress such as HO- 1 and NOX2[6]. The results showed that the expression of NOX2 and HO-1was significantly increased in the WT EAE animals. These results were in accordance to the expression of MBP indicating degradation of myelin in the EAE animals.

Ferritin, the iron storage protein, can when reaching excessive levels cause ROS. The levels of ferritin are found to be increased in MS patients compared to normal controls as an attempt to protect against the free levels/excess of iron[7].

We have now made changes to this comment as well as referred to the study in section “Discussion” p. 19 l. 404 and l. 406-409.

5) More discussion about EAE as a model of MS in humans is much needed here. What are the similarities, and what are the limitations?

Response: The experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model is an in vivo state-of-art animal model of MS as it mimics the pathological and clinical features present in the disease.

We have included more discussion of the use of EAE as a model for MS in section “Discussion” p. 20 l. 429-435.

Reviewer #2: The article entitled,” Pharmacological Inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 inhibits and reverses experimental autoimmune encephalitis in rodents” by Morkholt et al., describes the mechanism of action of a CPT1 inhibitor in vivo. Overall, experiments performed and data analysis are appropriate, and the manuscript can be published in PLOS One after the authors provide some clarification.

1) Fig 3a and b. The authors indicate that rats that received CPT1 inhibitor etomoxir showed lower clinical scores compared to placebo. However, the results were significant only for day 11 data. Furthermore, there was a significant change in body weight. In fact, compared to the change in body weight, the clinical score was less significant. The authors need to explain this.

Response: This is a good observation and comment of the reviewer. In this rat model the development of EAE was highly aggressive, and all placebo animals died within these 11 days. The effect of the disease induction on the feeding behavior has been found to be preceding the clinical score. In this model weight change is a first indication of disease induction, which therefore has a higher significance.

2) The respiratory chain is an important aspect of cellular metabolism. Inhibition of CPT1 is affected in all cells in the body. Is there any selectivity with CPT1 inhibitors only to neuronal cells?

Response: Same answer as to Reviewer #1 question 2).

CPT1a is expressed in all cells (except in muscle and adipose tissue). We and others have shown in the past that lymphocytes, macrophages dendritic cells etc. are all affected. In addition, astrocytes have shown to have upregulated CPT1a. The theory is that most cells are affected by the drug (etomoxir) and therefore, change the balance in the body to a more glucose metabolism, resulting in a reduced inflammation, reduced oxidative stress and the clinical effect on the disease.

References

1. Timmers S, Nabben M, Bosma M, Bree B Van, Lenaers E, Beurden D Van. Augmenting muscle diacylglycerol and triacylglycerol content by blocking fatty acid oxidation does not impede insulin sensitivity. PNAS. 2012;109: 11711–11716. doi:10.1073/pnas.1206868109

2. Lopaschuk GD, Mcneil GF, Mcveigh JJ. Glucose oxidation is stimulated in reperfused ischemic hearts with the carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 inhibitor , Etomoxir. 1989; 175–179.

3. Ratheiser K, Schneewiess B, Waldhausl W, Fasching P, Korn A, Nowotny P. Inhibition by Etomoxir of Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase I Reduces Hepatic Glucose Production and Plasma Lipids in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. Metabolism. 1991;40: 1185–1190.

4. Shriver LP, Manchester M. Inhibition of fatty acid metabolism ameliorates disease activity in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep. 2011;1: 6–11. doi:10.1038/srep00079

5. Mørkholt AS, Wiborg O, Nieland JGK, Nielsen S, Nieland JD. Blocking of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 potently reduces stress-induced depression in rat highlighting a pivotal role of lipid metabolism. Sci Rep. 2017;7. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02343-6

6. Mørkholt AS, Trabjerg MS, Krystian M, Oklinski E, Bolther L, Kroese LJ, et al. CPT1A plays a key role in the development and treatment of multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Sci Rep. 2019; 1–11. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49868-6

7. Williams R, Buchheit C., Berman NE., Levine S. Pathogenic implications of iron accumulation in multiple sclerosis. J Neurochem. 2012;120: 7–25. doi:10.1111/j.1471- 4159.2011.07536.x.Pathogenic

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Fulvio D'Acquisto

28 May 2020

Pharmacological inhibition of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 inhibits and reverses experimental autoimmune encephalitis in rodents

PONE-D-19-35522R1

Dear Dr. Nieland,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Fulvio D'Acquisto, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Fulvio D'Acquisto

1 Jun 2020

PONE-D-19-35522R1

Pharmacological inhibition of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 inhibits and reverses experimental autoimmune encephalitis in rodents

Dear Dr. Nieland:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Fulvio D'Acquisto

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    Data are available in manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES