Abstract
This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between dental symptoms experienced by occupational divers during diving and their participation in preventative dental visits. The questionnaire for this study was sent by post to 160 establishments and 215 members of the Japan Diving Association and participants were asked to complete a self-reported questionnaire. Data from 242 occupational divers (male, aged 20–79 yr) were analyzed. Multiple logistic regression analysis and correspondence analysis were performed to determine the relationship between dental symptoms experienced during diving and participation in preventative dental visits. We found that divers who experienced tooth pain while diving had not undergone preventative dental visits within the previous year (odds ratio: 2.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.12–6.80). This was also confirmed by correspondence analysis These findings suggested that not undergoing preventative dental visits was related to tooth pain during diving.
Keywords: Dental symptoms, Preventative dentistry, Occupational diver, Questionnaire, Tooth pain
Introduction
Studies in the industrial field have reported many oral symptoms in individuals exposed to the low-pressure environments of the aviation industry1), but less attention has been paid to occupational divers exposed to high-pressure environments. As the demand for diving work in marine development is increasing worldwide2), the number of workers in this field may increase.
The body of a diver is exposed to significant pressure changes during dive3). As the diver descends and pressure of water column increases, the volume of the gas in compressible spaces decreases. In spaces with rigid or semi-rigid walls, it can result in a relative negative pressure. Negative pressure can cause mucosal edema, hemorrhage, and even perforation if the pressure cannot be equalized. During ascent, the volume of gas increases as the ambient pressure decreases. If the pressure in an air-containing space cannot equalize with the surrounding pressure, the expanding volume of the gas may result in a variety of medical problems, including sinus pressure trauma, middle ear perforation, or pneumocephalus4) and dental problems. Oral tissues affection and barodontalgia were previously reported in occupational divers5). The underlying pathology and mechanisms of barodontalgia appear to be varied. Common oral pathologies have been reported as possible sources of barodontalgia: inflammatory cysts in the mandible, dental caries, defective tooth restoration, pulpitis, pulp necrosis, apical periodontitis, periodontal pockets, and mucous retention cysts6,7,8). A physiological explanation involves the difference between the swelling behavior of tooth enamel and dental pulp. Additionally, it has been reported that the liquid moves from the dentin to the pulp cavity after forming a cavity in the enamel under high pressure conditions9, 10). However, the mechanism is not completely understood11). Changes in pressure may also cause detachment of dental prosthetic appliances12,13,14). Additionally, temporomandibular disorders have been reported to be caused by repeated biting of scuba mouthpieces15).
Preventative dental visits are widely known to reduce intraoral problems among adults in general16). However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been little research into the relationship between preventative dental visits and specific dental symptoms during diving of which occupational divers complain. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between preventative dental visits and dental symptoms in occupational divers during diving. We hypothesized that preventative dental visits could prevent oral symptoms during diving.
Methods
Selection of participants
This questionnaire survey was conducted in Japan from February 14, 2019, to April 1, 2019. Figure 1 presents the flowchart of participant enrollment. The questionnaire for the study was sent by mail to 160 establishments and 215 members of Japan Diving Association. Three hundred seventy-four individuals had agreed to participate and returned questionnaire. Review of received questionnaires, excluded 103, whose occupation was not diving, two submitted by women, as there were too few individuals of this sex, and 27 incomplete questionnaires. Eventually, data from 242 participants were analyzed in this study. Subjects provided written informed consent to participate. The ethical committee of Tokyo Dental College approved this study (Approval Number 907).
Fig. 1.
The criteria for selection of the study subjects.
Questionnaire items
The questionnaire items were selected after considering the factors associated with dental symptoms during diving and the characteristics of professional divers. Also, oral hygiene status factors were selected as possible confounders. Information was collected on the working environment (number of dives: “How often do you do occupational diving per week?” categorized as 4 times a week or more, or 3 times a week or less; diving duration: “How long is the occupational diving duration?,” categorized as <300 min or ≥300 min). Furthermore, information on dental symptoms during occupational diving (“do you have tooth pain”, “do your teeth feel uncomfortable”, “are your teeth sensitive”, “do you have swollen gums”, “are your gums painful”, “do you have pressure in your teeth”, “do you have temporomandibular joint pain”, “do you have detachment of an inlay or crown”; categorized as yes or no) was collected. Moreover, dental care utilization patterns (“Have you received dental treatment?”, categorized as within the past half a year or 1 yr: “How often do you visit the dentist’s office for prevention?”, categorized as not consulted, or consulted within the past two years, one year, six months, two to three months, or one month: “Have you received inlays or crowns within the past five years?”, and “Have you had teeth extracted in the past year?”, categorized as yes or no) were determined. Dental hygiene habits (frequency of daily brushing: “How often do you brush your teeth a day?” categorized as <3 or ≥3; duration of brushing teeth: “How many minutes do you brush your teeth?” categorized as <3 min or ≥3 min, were also recorded.
Statistical analyses
First, a χ2 test (or Fisher’s exact test for cases with fewer than five cells in the contingency table) was used to make comparisons between oral symptoms during diving and individual factors. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using multiple logistic regression analyses (forced-entry method). Oral symptoms were used as dependent variables. Preventative dental consultation (defined as more than one dental consultation within a year) was set as an independent variable. In addition, for age, frequency of diving, diving duration per day, use of dental treatment, receiving inlays or crowns within the past five years, tooth extraction within the past one year, frequency of toothbrushing per day, and toothbrushing duration were set as independent variables for adjustment. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to investigate the multicollinearity relationships among the independent variables.
In addition, correspondence analysis was used to compare each dental symptom experienced during occupational diving and the number of preventative dental visits. Correspondence analysis can be useful in understanding data overall, as well as the interrelationships between different responses. The relative positions of the category points in map indicates certain levels of similarity or association between the categories17).
Statistical analyses were carried out using SAS Version 9.4 for Windows (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), p-values <0.05 were regarded as signifying statistical significance.
Results
Table 1 shows the basic characteristics of the participants. The percentage of participants who dived four or more times a week for work-related reasons was 66.9%. The average diving duration in one day was 254.8 min. The average occupational diving work engagement years was 19.9 yr. In total, 46.3% of participants experienced some dental symptoms during occupational diving. Symptoms included tooth pain (17.8%), an uncomfortable feeling (not pain) in the teeth (9.9%), sensitive teeth (5.0%), swollen gums (4.1%), painful gums (6.6%), a feeling of pressure in the teeth (9.1%), pain in the temporomandibular joint (15.7%), and 12.0% had had detachment of inlays or crowns.
Table 1. Basic characteristics of participants.
| Age (yr) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20–29 | 30–39 | 40–49 | 50–59 | 60–69 | 70–79 | ||||||||
| % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | ||
| Frequency of diving | |||||||||||||
| ≥4 times a week | 68.4% | 26 | 61% | 30 | 74% | 50 | 67.2% | 41 | 65.2% | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2–3 times a week | 10.5% | 4 | 27% | 13 | 21% | 14 | 24.6% | 15 | 26.1% | 6 | 100% | 3 | |
| ≤1 time a week | 21.1% | 8 | 12% | 6 | 6% | 4 | 8.2% | 5 | 8.7% | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Duration of diving per day (min) | 223 | 238 | 281 | 263 | 263 | 120 | |||||||
| Occupational diving work engagement years | 4.6 | 10.9 | 19.9 | 29.7 | 37.7 | 26.7 | |||||||
| Tooth pain | 10.5% | 4 | 24% | 12 | 18% | 12 | 19.7% | 12 | 13.0% | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Uncomfortable feeling in the teeth | 2.6% | 1 | 10% | 5 | 12% | 8 | 13.1% | 8 | 8.7% | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Sensory sensitivity | 2.6% | 1 | 6% | 3 | 7% | 5 | 4.9% | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Swollen gums | 0.0% | 0 | 6% | 3 | 4% | 3 | 6.6% | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Painful gums | 0.0% | 0 | 6% | 3 | 4% | 3 | 11.5% | 7 | 13.0% | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Feeling of pressure in the teeth | 5.3% | 2 | 8% | 4 | 9% | 6 | 9.8% | 6 | 17.4% | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Pain in temporomandibular joint | 18.4% | 7 | 14% | 7 | 22% | 15 | 11.5% | 7 | 8.7% | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Detachment of inlays or crowns | 2.6% | 1 | 14% | 7 | 10% | 7 | 21.3% | 13 | 4.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
Table 2 shows the relationship between oral symptoms during occupational diving, age, the diving environment, dental consultation status, and personal oral care. “Tooth symptoms other than pain” correlated significantly with the “Detachment of inlays or crowns within the past five years” (p=0.002). “Periodontal symptoms” correlated significantly with “age” (p=0.023),”occupational diving work engagement year” (p=0.042) and “Dental treatment within the past six months” (p=0.022). However, none of the dental symptoms during occupational diving were correlated significantly with “preventative dental visits”.
Table 2. Relationship between individual factors and oral health symptoms using the χ2 test (n=242).
| n | Tooth pain | Tooth symptoms other than pain | Detachment of inlay or crown | Pain in Temporomandibular joint | Periodontal symptoms | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YES | Test | YES | Test | YES | Test | YES | Test | YES | Test | |||
| % | p | % | p | % | p | % | p | % | p | |||
| Age (yr) | ||||||||||||
| 20–44 | 122 | 14.8 | 0.216 | 17.2 | 0.381 | 8.2 | 0.067 | 14.8 | 0.683 | 4.9 | 0.023 | |
| 45–79 | 120 | 20.8 | 21.7 | 15.8 | 16.7 | 13.3 | ||||||
| Frequency of diving | ||||||||||||
| ≤3 times/week | 80 | 13.8 | 0.250 | 22.5 | 0.395 | 13.8 | 0.552 | 21.3 | 0.096 | 10.0 | 0.730 | |
| ≥4 times/week | 162 | 19.8 | 17.9 | 11.1 | 13.0 | 8.6 | ||||||
| Diving duration | ||||||||||||
| <300 min | 112 | 20.5 | 0.296 | 17.0 | 0.370 | 8.0 | 0.079 | 36.5 | 0.617 | 10.7 | 0.415 | |
| ≥300 min | 130 | 15.4 | 21.5 | 15.4 | 14.6 | 7.7 | ||||||
| Occupational diving work engagement years | ||||||||||||
| <20 yr | 116 | 17.2 | 0.837 | 16.4 | 0.251 | 9.5 | 0.250 | 16.4 | 0.781 | 5.2 | 0.042 | |
| ≥20 yr | 126 | 18.3 | 22.2 | 14.3 | 15.1 | 12.7 | ||||||
| Dental treatment within past 6 months | ||||||||||||
| No | 172 | 15.7 | 0.187 | 19.2 | 0.887 | 9.9 | 0.115 | 16.3 | 0.700 | 6.4 | 0.022 | |
| Yes | 70 | 22.9 | 20.0 | 17.1 | 14.3 | 15.7 | ||||||
| Preventative dental visits | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 74 | 12.2 | 0.130 | 18.9 | 0.896 | 13.5 | 0.627 | 13.5 | 0.535 | 10.8 | 0.537 | |
| No | 168 | 20.2 | 19.6 | 11.3 | 16.7 | 8.3 | ||||||
| Receiving of inlays or crowns within past 5 yr | ||||||||||||
| No | 105 | 15.2 | 0.367 | 10.5 | 0.002 | 10.5 | 0.527 | 17.1 | 0.590 | 6.7 | 0.251 | |
| Yes | 137 | 19.7 | 26.3 | 13.1 | 14.6 | 10.9 | ||||||
| Tooth extraction within past 1 yr | ||||||||||||
| No | 208 | 16.3 | 0.152 | 18.3 | 0.262 | 11.5 | 0.573 | 14.9 | 0.398 | 8.7 | 0.525 | |
| Yes | 34 | 26.5 | 26.5 | 14.7 | 20.6 | 11.8 | ||||||
| Number of toothbrushing per day | ||||||||||||
| ≥3 times | 10 | 30.0 | 0.389 | 40.0 | 0.106 | 20.0 | 0.342 | 10.0 | 0.613 | 10.0 | 1.000 | |
| ≤2 times | 232 | 17.2 | 18.5 | 11.6 | 15.9 | 9.1 | ||||||
| Toothbrushing duration per time | ||||||||||||
| ≥3 min | 168 | 19.0 | 0.433 | 17.9 | 0.354 | 9.5 | 0.076 | 14.3 | 0.361 | 7.7 | 0.270 | |
| ≤2 min | 74 | 14.9 | 23.0 | 17.6 | 18.9 | 12.2 | ||||||
Table 3 shows the relationship between the oral symptoms and health behavior for occupational divers, as assessed by multiple logistic regression analysis. There was a strong relationship (|r|>0.4) between the age and the number of occupational diving work engagement years, based on Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Therefore, occupational diving work engagement years was excluded as an independent variable to avoid multiple collinearity. The independent variables judged to be correlated with “Tooth pain” was dental consultation for prevention within the past one year (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.12–6.80). “Tooth symptoms other than pain” was the independent variable that correlated with loss of an inlay or a crown-wearing within the past five year (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.47–7.16). Diving duration (300 min or more per day) was correlated with “Detachment of an inlay or crown” (OR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.06–6.35). Age (45 yr or older) correlated with “Periodontal symptoms” (OR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.00–7.43).
Table 3. Factors contributing to individual indicators and oral health symptoms by multiple logistic regression analysis (n=242).
| Tooth pain | Tooth symptoms other than pain | Detachment of inlay or crown | Pain in Temporomandibular joint | Periodontal symptoms | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | p | OR | 95%CI | p | OR | 95%CI | p | OR | 95%CI | p | OR | 95%CI | p | ||
| Age (yr) | ||||||||||||||||
| 20–44 | 1 | 0.266 | 1 | 0.725 | 1 | 0.172 | 1 | 0.743 | 1 | 0.049 | ||||||
| 45–79 | 1.49 | 0.74–2.99 | 1.13 | 0.58–2.22 | 1.8 | 0.78–4.16 | 1.13 | 0.55–2.32 | 2.73 | 1.00–7.43 | ||||||
| Frequency of diving | ||||||||||||||||
| ≤3 times/week | 1 | 0.160 | 1 | 0.523 | 1 | 0.324 | 1 | 0.076 | 1 | 0.837 | ||||||
| ≥4 times/week | 1.76 | 0.80–3.88 | 0.79 | 0.39–1.61 | 0.65 | 0.28–1.53 | 0.51 | 0.25–1.07 | 0.90 | 0.34–2.37 | ||||||
| Diving duration | ||||||||||||||||
| <300 min | 1 | 0.242 | 1 | 0.175 | 1 | 0.037 | 1 | 0.635 | 1 | 0.564 | ||||||
| ≥300 min | 0.66 | 0.32–1.33 | 1.62 | 0.81–3.27 | 2.59 | 1.06–6.35 | 0.84 | 0.41–1.74 | 0.76 | 0.30–1.94 | ||||||
| Dental treatment within past 6 months | ||||||||||||||||
| No | 1 | 0.317 | 1 | 0.312 | 1 | 0.137 | 1 | 0.774 | 1 | 0.099 | ||||||
| Yes | 1.54 | 0.66–3.56 | 0.66 | 0.29–1.48 | 2.07 | 0.79–5.42 | 0.87 | 0.34–2.21 | 2.45 | 0.84–7.10 | ||||||
| Preventative dental visits | ||||||||||||||||
| Yes | 1 | 0.027 | 1 | 0.565 | 1 | 0.987 | 1 | 0.538 | 1 | 0.998 | ||||||
| No | 2.76 | 1.12–6.80 | 1.25 | 0.58–2.68 | 0.99 | 0.41–2.43 | 1.30 | 0.57–2.98 | 1 | 0.37–2.72 | ||||||
| Receiving of inlays or crowns within past 5 yr | ||||||||||||||||
| No | 1 | 0.595 | 1 | 0.004 | 1 | 0.864 | 1 | 0.342 | 1 | 0.878 | ||||||
| Yes | 1.23 | 0.57–2.67 | 3.25 | 1.47–7.16 | 0.92 | 0.37–2.30 | 0.68 | 0.31–1.50 | 1.09 | 0.38–3.15 | ||||||
| Tooth extraction within past 1 yr | ||||||||||||||||
| No | 1 | 0.257 | 1 | 0.345 | 1 | 1.000 | 1 | 0.250 | 1 | 0.731 | ||||||
| Yes | 1.73 | 0.67–4.48 | 1.57 | 0.62–3.98 | 1 | 0.32–3.18 | 1.82 | 0.66–5.08 | 0.80 | 0.23–2.85 | ||||||
| frequency of toothbrushing per day | ||||||||||||||||
| ≥3 times | 1 | 0.230 | 1 | 0.066 | 1 | 0.345 | 1 | 0.779 | 1 | 0.770 | ||||||
| ≤2 times | 0.39 | 0.08–1.82 | 0.26 | 0.06–1.09 | 0.43 | 0.08–2.46 | 1.37 | 0.16–12.03 | 1.40 | 0.15–13.33 | ||||||
| Toothbrushing duration per session | ||||||||||||||||
| ≥3 minutes | 1 | 0.308 | 1 | 0.473 | 1 | 0.092 | 1 | 0.291 | 1 | 0.408 | ||||||
| ≤2 minutes | 0.66 | 0.30–1.46 | 1.30 | 0.64–2.63 | 2.05 | 0.89–4.73 | 1.50 | 0.71–3.17 | 1.49 | 0.58–3.84 | ||||||
Above factors were simultaneously analyzed by forced entry. OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2 shows the biplot of the relationship between dental symptoms during occupational diving and the frequency of preventative dental visits. In this study, two dimensions were adopted from the cumulative contribution ratio and the category scores were plotted. Subjects who responded with “Not consulted” were plotted near “Tooth pain”, “Pain in the temporomandibular joint”, “Sensory sensitivity”, “Feeling of pressure in the teeth”, and “Uncomfortable feeling in the teeth”. Responses of “1 month” and “2–3 months” was located far from the other points. In the upper right of the plot, periodontal symptoms of “Painful gums” and “Swollen gums” were located, and “Detachment of inlays or crowns” was located between “1 yr” and “6 months.”
Fig. 2.
Biplot diagram for dental symptoms in occupational diving and preventative dental visit frequency.
Discussion
This study investigated the relationship between preventative dental visits and dental symptoms experienced by occupational divers. The results suggested that the dental pain experienced by occupational divers during diving is related to a lack of preventative dental visits. Multiple logistic regression analysis comparing factors related to dental symptoms during diving showed that divers who did not undergo preventative dentistry in the previous year were at high risk of tooth pain.
Tooth pain during diving was experienced by 17.8% of the participants. According to the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 14.4% of Japanese males with symptoms of tooth pain were in their 20s, 18.7% in their 30s, 15.4% in their 40s, 18.1% in their 50s, 22.1% in their 60s, and 29.9% in their 70s18), and Locker and Grushka reported that 13.5% of Canadian citizens had experienced discomfort other than pain as an oral symptom19). In our study, the proportion of people with complaints of tooth pain in their 20s, 30s, and 40s was higher than that reported for Japanese men, and tooth symptoms other than pain were experienced by 19.4% of participants. The reason may be related to the difference between atmospheric pressure conditions and the diving environment. Tooth pain during diving is can potentially be life-threatening by causing sudden incapacitation6). Hence each symptom experienced by divers deserves special consideration. Taylor et al. reported the incidence of tooth pain as 11.4% in leisure and professional divers20). In addition, Al-Hajri et al. reported this rate as 17.3% in a group of military personnel and diving school students21). In Japan, this incidence is reported as 15.8% among Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force divers22). The incidence in this study was similar to these previously reported values.
Gunepin et al. reported that there is less tooth pain during diving among military divers who routinely visit the dentist once a year or more23). However, our results did not show this to be a significant factor in the univariate analysis by χ2 test but did reveal a significant association in multiple logistic regression analysis. This association may be influenced by the fact that civilians may have less ready access to healthcare than active military workers24), although in Japan, the national insurance system covers a wide range of dental treatments25), and the whole nation has easy access to dental consultations, which may have made it difficult to distinguish a difference.
From the results of the correspondence analysis, the relationship between the frequency of preventative dental visits and each symptom during occupational diving was investigated in an exploratory manner. The horizontal axis of the biplot represents the frequency of preventative dental visits, increasing toward the right of the plot. Subjects who answered, “Two years”, were located to the left of “Not consulted”. There was a mixture of individuals who did not require preventative visits because of their low risk of dental disease and those that did not engage in preventative visits, although they had a high risk, among subjects who answered, “Not consulted”. Subjects who answered “1 month” were located far from the other points. This reflected a special group with high risk factors for oral conditions, who were instructed by a dentist to be followed-up regularly. “Tooth pain” and “Pain in the temporomandibular joint”, which is considered to be caused by water pressure, were located near the subjects who answered, “Not consulted”. Thus, both of these symptoms may be related to not engaging in preventative dental visits. We first considered that “Uncomfortable feeling in the teeth”, “Sensory sensitivity”, and “Feeling of pressure in the teeth” may be early stage symptoms of tooth pain, but correspondence analysis showed that these three symptoms form a group apart from “Tooth pain”, and thus they may be independent symptoms. Also, “Detachment of inlays or crowns”, which is said to be caused by the destruction of cement, were located near the subjects who answered “6 months”. The weakening of dental cement may not be prevented by preventative dental visits. However, dental visits may be related to early recognition of incompatibility of inlays or crowns. The condition of the two periodontal tissues was located equally far apart from the item of each preventative dental visit frequency. The reason is that they already had periodontal disease, and they may have symptoms of the periodontal disease not only during diving but also outside of diving. Because they were undergoing maintenance treatment, the occurrence of symptoms may be low.
In Japan, occupational divers need to obtain a national qualification. All workers who work in special environments that affect health also need to undergo special health check-ups by a doctor under the Industrial Safety and Health Act of Japanese law26). Medical problems caused by diving have been reported, such as bone necrosis27) and otorhinal diseases4). Hence, a special medical checkup of divers is performed in Japan, and the items for medical history and work history, pain in joints, pain in hips or lower legs, tinnitus, the examination of the motor function of the extremities, the examination of the tympanic membrane and hearing, measurement of blood pressure, urinalysis, and spirometry is reported annually28). A previous study has recommended preventative dental consultation for divers6). However, although in some countries and regions, divers are also eligible for dental examinations, in many countries, including Japan, they are not. Dental examinations for divers may be effective for preventing dental symptoms during diving.
This study had some limitations. This study made use of a self-reported questionnaire; there was no information on actual oral diseases. Therefore, our study may have included not only symptoms caused by diving, but also pre-existing symptoms. However, Zadik stated that common oral pathologies could result in barodontalgia and that existing asymptomatic oral diseases also cause pain7). Subjects were occupational divers who worked for a company or belonged to the Japan Diving Association. In Japan, about 2,000 occupational divers take part in a special health check-up, but there are about 5,000 licenses issued every year. Small-scale fishermen and individual business owners who do not work for a company or belong to the association may not have been included in this study. This study did not include occupational divers performing saturation diving that involves very deep dives29). However, since factors such as educational background, use of diving and scuba, gear, and diving depth, and information on the number of dives per day, and the timing of pain occurrence could not be controlled for in this questionnaire-based survey, it is possible that these factors can be confounding factors. Finally, this cross-sectional study could not examine causal relationship between dental symptoms experienced during diving and its risk factors because of the nature of study design; therefore, further research is required to demonstrate a causal relationship.
Conclusion
There was relationship between poor participation in preventative dental visits and tooth pain while diving among occupational divers. These results indicated that engaging in regular preventative dental visits may reduce tooth pain during occupational diving.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Research Fund for Clinical Study of Industrial Accidents and Diseases (170501-02).
References
- 1.Lakshmi, Sakthi DS. (2014) Aviation dentistry. J Clin Diagn Res 8, 288–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Japan Ministry of Justice. Current status of the marine development market. https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/001215814.pdf/. Accessed July 25, 2019.
- 3.Eichhorn L, Leyk D. (2015) Diving medicine in clinical practice. Dtsch Arztebl Int 112, 147–57, quiz 158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Livingstone DM, Smith KA, Lange B. (2017) Scuba diving and otology: a systematic review with recommendations on diagnosis, treatment and post-operative care. Diving Hyperb Med 47, 97–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Robichaud R, McNally ME. (2005) Barodontalgia as a differential diagnosis: symptoms and findings. J Can Dent Assoc 71, 39–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zadik Y, Drucker S. (2011) Diving dentistry: a review of the dental implications of scuba diving. Aust Dent J 56, 265–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zadik Y. (2009) Barodontalgia. J Endod 35, 481–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kollmann W. (1993) Incidence and possible causes of dental pain during simulated high altitude flights. J Endod 19, 154–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stoetzer M, Kuehlhorn C, Ruecker M, Ziebolz D, Gellrich NC, von See C. (2012) Pathophysiology of barodontalgia: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Dent 2012, 453415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carlson OG, Halverson BA, Triplett RG. (1983) Dentin permeability under hyperbaric conditions as a possible cause of barodontalgia. Undersea Biomed Res 10, 23–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zadik Y. (2010) Barodontalgia: what have we learned in the past decade? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109, e65–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Peker I, Erten H, Kayaoglu G. (2009) Dental restoration dislodgment and fracture during scuba diving: a case of barotrauma. J Am Dent Assoc 140, 1118–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gulve MN, Gulve ND. (2013) Provisional crown dislodgement during scuba diving: a case of barotrauma. Case Rep Dent 2013, 749142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gulve MN, Gulve ND. (2013) The effect of pressure changes during simulated diving on the pull out strength of glass fiber posts. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 10, 737–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aldridge RD, Fenlon MR. (2004) Prevalence of temporomandibular dysfunction in a group of scuba divers. Br J Sports Med 38, 69–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Richards W, Ameen J. (2002) The impact of attendance patterns on oral health in a general dental practice. Br Dent J 193, 697–702, discussion 695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Greenacre M. (1992) Correspondence analysis in medical research. Stat Methods Med Res 1, 97–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Summary Report of Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions 2016. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-hss/dl/report_gaikyo_2016.pdf/.Accessed August 22, 2019.
- 19.Locker D, Grushka M. (1987) Prevalence of oral and facial pain and discomfort: preliminary results of a mail survey. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 15, 169–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Taylor DM, O’Toole KS, Ryan CM. (2003) Experienced scuba divers in Australia and the United States suffer considerable injury and morbidity. Wilderness Environ Med 14, 83–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Al-Hajri W, Almadi E. (2006) Prevalence of barodontalgia among pilots and divers in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Saudi Dent J 18, 134–40. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Terada S, Suzuki S, Itou A. (1996) On the occurrence of toothache during diving. Jpn J Hyperb Med 31, 41. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gunepin M, Derache F, Blatteau JE, Nakdimon I, Zadik Y. (2016) Incidence and features of barodontalgia among military divers. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 87, 137–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hoerster KD, Lehavot K, Simpson T, McFall M, Reiber G, Nelson KM. (2012) Health and health behavior differences: U.S. Military, veteran, and civilian men. Am J Prev Med 43, 483–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shibuya K, Hashimoto H, Ikegami N, Nishi A, Tanimoto T, Miyata H, Takemi K, Reich MR. (2011) Future of Japan’s system of good health at low cost with equity: beyond universal coverage. Lancet 378, 1265–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Japan Ministry of Justice. Japanese Law Translation. http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?re=02&ia=03&vm=02&id=1926/. Accessed April 11, 2019.
- 27.Uguen M, Pougnet R, Uguen A, Loddé B, Dewitte JD. (2014) Dysbaric osteonecrosis among professional divers: a literature review. Undersea Hyperb Med 41, 579–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Japan International Center for Occupational Safety and Health. https://www.jniosh.johas.go.jp/icpro/jicoshold/japanese/country/japan/laws/03_rel/09_highpressure_reg/04.html/. Accessed April 11, 2019.
- 29.Brubakk AO, Ross JA, Thom SR. (2014) Saturation diving; physiology and pathophysiology. Compr Physiol 4, 1229–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]