Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Jun 10;10:9387. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66094-7

Clinical analysis in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis in western China

Junyan Qu 1, Xiaoli Zhang 1, Yang Lu 2, Xijiao Liu 3, Xiaoju Lv 1,
PMCID: PMC7287058  PMID: 32523003

Abstract

Cryptococcosis is a systemic infection and it may occur in immunocompromised and immunocompetent hosts. In order to better understand the clinical characteristics of patients with PC in different immune status, we retrospectively investigated the clinical, radiological, and treatment profiles of immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients with PC during a 10-year period (2008–2017). As a result, out of 136 patients, 94 (69.1%) were immunocompromised hosts. For the PC patients without CNS involvement, higher percentage of immunocompetent patients (39.5%, 15/38) had asymptomatic presentation than immunocompromised patients (6.3%, 3/48) (P < 0.05). Multiple pulmonary nodules (72.7%, 56/77), ground-glass attenuation/interstitial changes (94.4%, 17/18) and cavitation (88.6%, 31/35) were significantly frequent in immunocompromised patients (P < 0.05). A total of 47 patients were misdiagnosed as tuberculosis or tumors based on CT signs. PC was likely to be misdiagnosed as tuberculosis in immunocompromised patients (88.2%, 15/17), and tumor was more likely to be considered in immunocompetent patients (43.3%, 13/30). Immunocompetent patients accounted for 80% (24/30) of patients with definite diagnosis on surgical lung biopsy. Fluconazole monotherapy can achieve good clinical outcome in most PC patients without central nervous system (CNS) involvement (91.5%, 54/59). After 3 months of treatment, 92.7% (38/41) patients have improved imaging findings. In conclusion, PC has diverse imaging manifestations and it is easily misdiagnosed. Lobectomy should be carefully selected in immunocompetent patients with a single lung lesion. Fluconazole monotherapy is preferred for PC patients without CNS involvement.

Subject terms: Fungal infection, Radiography, Antimicrobial therapy

Introduction

Cryptococcosis is a fungal disease with worldwide distribution caused by members of the Cryptococcus gattii/neoformans species complexes. There were approximately 225,000 new cryptococcal meningitis cases occur globally each year with significant mortality, especially among acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients1. Cryptococcus is widely distributed in nature and can be found in bird droppings, soil and decaying wood2. The respiratory tract is the primary portal for cryptococcal invasion, pulmonary cryptococcosis (PC) may occur after inhalation of Cryptococcus spores3. Epidemiological study have shown that the incidence of PC has increased more than six times between 1999 and 2006 in British Columbia, Canada, which has the largest number of Cryptococcus deuterogattii infections reported worldwide4,5. In recent years, cryptococcosis has been on the rise in China because of better diagnostics and prior publication bias6. Cryptococcus may disseminate to central nervous system (CNS) and other organs via blood transfusions. Immune function plays a vital role in the development of cryptococcosis. Although immunocompromised hosts are more susceptible to PC, it can also occur in immunocompetent subjects7. Recent researches also found these apparently immunocompetent patients may have potential immune genetic defects810. PC is often misdiagnosed as bacterial pneumonia, tuberculosis or lung cancer because of the similar clinical manifestations and radiological characteristics. Previous reports on the characteristics of cryptococcosis in China have focused on the patients from southeast and north of China11,12. Data about PC from western China is sparse. Due to the different climatic conditions in the eastern and western China, the disease characteristics maybe different. With the development of new diagnostic techniques and the increase in the number of immunocompromised individuals in recent years, we need to better understand the clinical characteristics of patients with PC in different immune status.

In this study, we compared the demographic features, clinical presentations, radiographic findings, therapeutic strategies and therapeutic outcomes in immunocompetent and immunocompromised PC patients who were admitted to a university hospital from Jan 2008 to Dec 2017 in western China.

Materials and Methods

Patients

From Jan 2008 to Dec 2017, the patients with a diagnosis of PC at hospital discharge were retrospectively reviewed in West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China (a 4,300-bed academic tertiary hospital). Inclusion in the final study group required the diagnosis of PC as defined as follows: (1) clinical and radiographic findings consistent with PC; and (2) histological presence of the organism in lung specimens, and/or isolation of Cryptococcus from respiratory secretions and/or blood specimens without other suspected etiologies, and/or positive result of a serum cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen (CrAg) test. Lumbar punctures were performed in the patients with positive blood Cryptococcus culture or positive CrAg test or patients with clinical manifestations of meningitis. The diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis was made if cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture for Cryptococcus and/or CSF India ink stain were positive. Exclusion criteria were age under 14 years, pregnant mothers, suspected or confirmed co-infection with other pathogens. Follow-up data was obtained through telephone calls and outpatient department visits. The last follow up was on December 31, 2018. The following data of age, sex, underlying diseases, initial clinical presentations, duration of initial symptoms to diagnosis, laboratory data, radiographic findings, therapeutic strategies and therapeutic outcomes were extracted and verified from the medical records by two authors independently.

Laboratory studies

Laboratory tests such as blood routine, blood biochemistry, T lymphocyte subset, serum immunoglobulin and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test were performed. CSF was sent for white blood cell count, glucose, chloride, total protein, India ink stain, CSF CrAg test, tuberculous (TB) smearing, TB DNA, fungal and bacterial cultures. Fungal culture was performed on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA). CrAg test was performed using Latex Cryptococcal Antigen Detection System (Immuno-Mycologics, Inc., Norman, USA). T lymphocyte subset was measured using flow cytometry. The levels of serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G, IgA and IgM were measured using immunoturbidimetry.

Group classification

The patients were divided into two groups (immunocompetent patients and immunocompromised patients group) according to their immune status. The patients who are classified into the immunocompromised group must meet at least one of the following conditions:7 (1) Any two values of serum IgG, IgA or IgM were below the lower limit of normal detection values; (2) The percentage of CD4 cells was <30% or CD4+ T lymphocyte count was <350/μL or the ratio of CD4/CD8 < 1. (3) Peripheral absolute neutrophil count was <2.0 × 104 cells/mL or absolute lymphocyte count was <1,000 cells/mL. (4) Patient has at least one of the following conditions: use of immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroids, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hematological malignancies, solid tumor, HIV infection, history of organ transplantation, severe respiratory system limitation or connective tissue disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Histology

Of the 136 cases, 72 cases were diagnosed by histopathology. A total of 30 cases received surgical biopsy, 31 cases underwent transthoracic needle biopsy and 11 cases underwent transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB). Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for histological examination, embedded in paraffin and cut into 4 mm sections. Sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and examined by light microscopy. Histochemically stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), mucus card Red (Mc) and Gomori Methenamine Silver (GMS) were performed in every sample and some tumor markers were performed in part of the samples according to initial pathological findings. Acid-fast staining and M. tuberculosis examination by fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (Zhishan biotechnology co., LTD, Xiamen, China) were also performed in part of the samples.

Radiological assessment

All PC patients were scanned by 64-row multi-slice spiral computed tomography (CT) (SOMATOM definition AS+, Siemens) in our hospital. Consecutive 5-mm thick sections were obtained from the lung apices to the lung bases during inspiration in the supine position. High resolution CT scans were obtained with 1-mm collimation in some patients. All images were reviewed independently by two thoracic radiologists who were unaware of the patients’ immune statuses and clinical symptoms. Several radiological findings were recorded including nodule or mass, pulmonary cavity, patchy consolidation, ground glass opacity, mediastinal lymph node enlargement, pleural effusion, pleural incrassation or conglutination. The distribution of the lesion in the lungs was also collected. The brain CT or magnetic resonance imaging was performed if the patients had CNS infections. After a definite diagnosis in our hospital, some patients returned to the local hospital for further treatment and follow-up. We obtained follow-up CT examinations of some patients after treatment. Improvement of CT images was defined as a reduction in the number and size of lesions. Complete radiologic remission was defined as complete disappearance of the lesions.

Treatment strategies

PC patients were treated with fluconazole (200–400 mg per day IV or orally) or Itraconazole (200 mg twice per day orally). Some patients initially diagnosed with lung cancer underwent surgical lobectomy. According to the guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease and our experiences13,14, the patients with CNS involvement were treated with two antifungal agents (amphotericin B/amphotericin B liposome and 5-flucytosine) or three antifungal agents [amphotericin B (0.5–1 mg/kg per day IV)/amphotericin B liposome (3 mg/kg per day IV), 5-flucytosine (100 mg/kg per day orally) and fluconazole (800 mg per day IV)] for 8–12 weeks of induction therapy, and then fluconazole (400 mg per day IV or orally) for 8 weeks of consolidation therapy followed by fluconazole (200 mg per day orally) for more than 6 months of maintenance therapy. Fluconazole would be replaced by voriconazole (loading dose, 6 mg/kg twice per day; maintenance dose, 4 mg/kg twice per day IV or orally) if the initial treatments were not effective. In the subjects with HIV infection, the consolidation and maintenance periods would be prolonged.

Clinical outcome evaluating criteria

Based on clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, imaging findings and mycologic evidence, clinical outcome was classified as follows: (1) Improvement was defined as a complete or partial response to therapy for 1 year after receiving medical treatment or surgery. (2) Failure was defined as death or disease progression or persistence for 1 year with medication. For postoperative and asymptomatic patients, the assessment of antifungal response was mainly based on imaging findings indicating continuous improvement and absence of new lesions.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Shapiro-Wilk normality test was conducted for all quantitative variables15. Significance testing was carried out using Student’s t test for normally distributed data and Chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval and informed consent

This study was conducted in accordance with the amended Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, which waived the informed consent requirement because all the data in this study were routinely obtained.

Results

Patient characteristics

From January 2008 to December 2017, a total of 136 PC patients (mean age 51.91 ± 15.10 years; 87 males) were included in this retrospective study. The demographic and clinical features of these patients were summarized in Table 1. High peak age of the PC patients was from 31 to 60 years old (92/136, 67.6%) regardless of the immune status. CNS involvement was more common in immunocompromised patients than in immunocompetent patients (P <0.05). For the patients without CNS involvement, cough (37/48, 77.1%) and fever (17/48, 35.4%) were the most common presenting symptoms in immunocompromised patients. More immunocompetent patients (15/38, 39.5%) were asymptomatic than immunocompromised patients (3/48, 6.3%) (P = 0.000). The most common presenting symptoms were headache (39/50, 78.0%) and fever (25/50, 50.0%) in the patients with CNS involvement. The most frequently underlying diseases or factors of immunocompromised patients were HIV infection (22/94, 23.4%), immune system disease (16/94, 17.0%), use of immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroids (16/94, 17.0%) (see Table 2).

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics in immunocompetent and immunocompromised pulmonary cryptococcosis patients.

Variables Immunocompromised Patients (N = 94)(n,%) Immunocompetent Patients (N = 42)(n,%) P-value
Sex
Male 64 (68.1) 23 (54.8) 0.176
Female 30 (31.9) 19 (45.2)
Age (years)
≤30 7 (7.5) 5 (11.9) 0.091
31–60 60 (63.8) 32 (76.2)
å 60 27 (28.7) 5 (11.9)
CNS involvement 46 (48.9) 4 (9.5) 0.000
Exposure history (pigeon droppings) 14 (14.9) 12 (28.6) 0.097
Underlying diseases and factors 88 (93.6) 0 (0.0) 0.000
Presenting symptoms and signs (CNS non-involvement) N = 48 N = 38
Asymptomatic 3 (6.3) 15 (39.5) 0.000
Cough 37 (77.1) 16 (42.1) 0.002
Fever 17 (35.4) 3 (7.9) 0.004
Chest pain 10 (20.8) 5 (13.2) 0.404
Shortness of breath 12 (25.0) 4 (10.5) 0.102
Presenting symptoms and signs (CNS involvement)
N = 46 N = 4
Headache 36 (78.3) 3 (75.0) NA
Fever 23 (50.0) 2 (50.0)
Cough 9 (19.6) 0 (0.0)
Vomiting 15 (32.6) 2 (50.0)
Altered mental status 9 (19.6) 1 (25.0)

CNS: central nervous system; NA: not applied.

Table 2.

The underlying diseases and factors of immunocompromised pulmonary cryptococcosis patients.

Underlying diseases and factors Patients (N = 94)(n,%)
HIV infection 22 (23.4)
Immune system disease 20 (21.3)
Immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroids 16 (17.0)
Diabetes mellitus 10 (10.6)
Chronic lung disease 10 (10.6)
Hematologic disease 8 (8.5)
Chronic kidney disease 7 (7.4)
Organ transplantation 5 (5.3)
Solid tumor 5 (5.3)
Hepatobiliary diseases 6 (6.4)
Hepatitis B carriers 2(2.1)

Radiological findings

Chest CT was performed in all these patients. The imaging manifestations were diverse, as shown in Fig. 1. Table 3 shows the details of chest CT findings in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. The most common manifestations were pulmonary nodules (93/136, 68.4%) and patchy shadows (56/136, 41.2%). Multiple pulmonary nodules, ground-glass attenuation/interstitial changes and cavitation were more common in immunocompromised patients (P <0.05). The involvement rate of bilateral lungs was 57.4% (78/136), which mostly involving left lower lung. Lesions were more likely to involve bilateral lungs in immunocompromised patients (P <0.05). A total of 47 patients were misdiagnosed as tuberculosis or tumor. Immunocompromised PC patients were more likely to be misdiagnosed as tuberculosis than immunocompetent patients, and tumor was more likely to be considered in immunocompetent patients, but there was no significant difference (P >0.05).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The findings of chest computed tomography of pulmonary crypotoccosis (immunocompetent patients: (ae); immunocompromised patients: (fh): (a) ground glass attenuation; (b) a single small nodule; (c) multiple lung nodules; (d) patchy shadows with air bronchogram; (e) nodular shadow with spiculate boundary; (f) pulmonary cavity; (g) scattered irregular patchy consolidation, nodules and mass shadows in bilateral lungs, and formation of cavities in a few lesions; (h) shadows of miliary nodules in bilateral lungs.

Table 3.

Chest CT findings in immunocompetent and immunocompromised pulmonary cryptococcosis patients.

Findings Total (N = 136)(n,%) Immunocompromised Patients (N = 94)(n,%) Immunocompetent Patients (N = 42) (n,%) P-value
Lesion characterization
Pulmonary nodules 93 (68.4) 60 (63.8) 33 (78.6) 0.111
Solitary 16 (17.2) 4 (6.7) 12 (36.4) 0.001
Multiple 77 (82.8) 56 (93.3) 21 (63.6)
Patchy shadows 56 (41.2) 40 (42.6) 16 (38.1) 0.707
Ground-glass attenuation /interstitial changes 18 (13.2) 17 (18.1) 1 (2.4) 0.012
Consolidations 28 (20.6) 19 (20.2) 9 (21.4) 1.000
Cavitation 35 (25.7) 31 (33.0) 4 (9.5) 0.005
Pleural effusion 20 (14.7) 14 (14.9) 6 (14.3) 1.000
Pleural thickening/adhesions 25 (18.4) 19 (20.2) 6 (14.3) 0.480
Enlarged lymph nodes 15 (11.0) 12 (12.8) 3 (7.1) 0.393
Lesion area
Right lung 30 (23.5) 15 (16.0) 15 (35.7) 0.014
Left lung 26 (19.1) 16 (17.0) 10 (23.8) 0.355
Bilateral lungs 78 (57.4) 61 (64.9) 17 (40.5) 0.009
Lesion area
Upper lung 89 (65.4) 67 (71.3) 22 (52.4) 0.050
Middle lung 58 (42.6) 44 (46.8) 14 (33.3) 0.189
Lower lung 115 (84.6) 80 (85.1) 35 (83.3) 0.801
Lesion area
Right upper lobe 68 (50.0) 53 (56.4) 16 (38.1) 0.063
Right middle lobe 55 (40.4) 42 (44.7) 13 (31.0) 0.185
Right lower lobe 50 (36.8) 30 (31.9) 20 (47.6) 0.087
Left upper lobe 71 (52.2) 54 (57.4) 17 (40.5) 0.094
Left lower lobe 86 (63.2) 64 (68.1) 22 (52.4) 0.087
Suspected tuberculosis 17 (12.5) 15 (16.0) 2 (4.8) 0.069
Suspected tumor 30 (22.1) 17 (18.1) 13 (31.0) 0.096

Diagnostic procedures for histopathologically confirmed patients

A total of 72 cases of PC were diagnosed by histopathology (as shown in Table 4). More immunocompetent patients were diagnosed by surgical biopsy, and percutaneous lung biopsy was more likely to be adopted in immunocompromised patients (P <0.05).

Table 4.

Diagnostic procedures for histopathologically confirmed patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis.

Diagnostic method Total (N = 72) (n,%) Immunocompromised Patients (N = 38)(n,%) Immunocompetent Patients (N = 34) (n,%) P-value
Transbronchial lung biopsy 11 (15.3) 9 (23.7) 2 (5.9) 0.050
Percutaneous lung biopsy 31 (43.0) 23 (60.5) 8 (23.5) 0.002
Surgical lung biopsy 30 (41.7) 6 (15.8) 24 (70.6) 0.000

Treatment strategies and clinical outcome

A total of 40.4% (38/94) and 35.7% (15/42) of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients received treatment within 30 days after the onset of symptoms, respectively. There was no significant difference in the time from onset of symptoms to treatment/diagnosis between immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients (P > 0.05). Nine patients did not receive treatment after diagnosis. Treatment for other patients were categorized as surgery, antifungal drugs, or both. Most patients (104/136, 76.5%) were treated with antifungal drugs alone, especially immunocompromised patients. More immunocompetent patients (15/42, 35.7%) were treated with surgery and postsurgical medication than immunocompromised patients (5/94, 5.3%). Among CNS involved patients, most of them (41/50, 82.0%) were also given drug therapy alone. Surgery and drug therapy were combined in 39.5% (15/38) patients without CNS involvement. Among CNS uninvolved patients, more immunocompetent patients (30/37, 81.1%) were treated with fluconazole monotherapy than immunocompromised patients (29/45, 64.4%). The duration of the treatment ranged from 1 week to 2.5 years. The improvement rate in immunocompetent patients were higher than that of immunocompromised patients (P < 0.05), as shown in Table 5.

Table 5.

Therapeutic regimen and treatment outcome of 136 patients with pulmonary cryptococcosis.

Variables Immunocompromised Patients (N = 94)(n,%) Immunocompetent Patients (N = 42)(n,%) P-value Improved outcome P-value
Time from onset of symptoms to treatment/diagnosis (d) Immunocompromised Patients (n,%) Immunocompetent Patients (n,%)
0–30 38 (40.4) 15 (35.7) 0.859 19 (19/38, 50.0) 15 (15/15, 100.0) 0.000
31–90 33(35.1) 15 (35.7) 20 (20/33, 60.6) 15 (15/15, 100.0) 0.004
91–180 14 (14.9) 6 (14.3) 7 (7/14, 50.0) 6 (6/6, 100.0) 0.051
>180 9 (9.6) 6 (14.3) 5 (5/9, 55.6) 6 (6/6, 100.0) NA
Time from onset of symptoms to treatment/diagnosis (d) (CNS non-involvement)
N = 48 N = 38
0–30 14 (29.2) 14 (36.8) 0.871 9 (9/14, 64.3) 14 (14/14, 100.0) 0.041
31–90 20 (41.7) 13 (34.2) 17 (17/20, 85.0) 13 (13/13, 100.0) 0.261
91–180 6 (15.0) 5 (13.2) 4 (4/6, 66.7) 5 (5/5, 100.0) 0.455
å 180 8 (16.6) 6 (15.8) 4 (4/8, 50.0) 6 (6/6, 100.0) NA
Time from onset of symptoms to treatment/diagnosis (d) (CNS involvement)
N = 46 N = 4
0–30 24 (52.2) 1 (25.0) 0.620 10 (10/24, 41.7) 1 (1/1, 100.0) NA
31–90 12 (26.1) 2 (50.0) 3 (3/12, 25.0) 2 (2/2, 100.0)
91–180 7 (15.2) 1 (25.0) 3 (3/7, 42.9) 1 (1/1, 100.0)
å 180 3 (6.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (1/3, 33.3) 0
Treatment
No treatment 9 (9.6) 0 (0.0) 0.000 1 (1/9, 11.1) 0 NA
Surgery 2 (2.1) 1 (2.4) 1 (1/2, 50.0) 1 (1/1, 100.0) NA
Antifungal drugs 78 (83.0) 26 (61.9) 50 (50/78, 64.1) 26 (26/26, 100.0) 0.000
Surgery + antifungal drugs 5 (5.3) 15 (35.7) 5 (5/5, 100.0) 15 (15/15, 100.0) NA
Treatment (CNS involvement)
N = 46 N = 4
No treatment 8 (17.4) 0 (0.0) NA 0 0 NA
Surgery 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 0
Antifungal drugs 37 (80.4) 4 (100.0) 22 (22/37, 59.5) 4 (4/4, 100.0)
Surgery + antifungal drugs 1 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (1/1, 100.0) 0
Treatment (CNS non-involvement)
N = 48 N = 38
No treatment 1 (2.1) 0 (0.0) 0.006 1 (1/1, 100.0) 0 NA
Surgery 2 (4.2) 1 (2.6) 1 (1/2, 50.0) 1 (1/1, 100.0) NA
Antifungal drugs 41 (85.4) 22 (57.9) 28 (28/41, 68.3) 22 (22/22, 100.0) 0.002
Surgery + antifungal drugs 4 (8.3) 15 (39.5) 4 (4/4, 100.0) 15 (15/15, 100.0) NA
Antifungal treatment (CNS involvement)
N = 38 N = 4
FCZ 4 (10.5) 0 (0.0) NA 0 0 NA
VCZ 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 0
Itraconazole 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 0
AmB + 5-FC 6 (15.8) 1 (25.0) 2 (2/6, 33.3) 1 (1/1, 100.0)
AmB + FCZ/VCZ 8 (21.1) 0 (0.0) 5 (5/8, 62.5) 0
FCZ/VCZ + 5-FC 4 (10.5) 1 (25.0) 2 (2/4, 50.0) 1 (1/1, 100.0)
AmB + FCZ/VCZ + 5-FC 16 (42.1) 2 (50.0) 11 (11/16, 68.8) 2 (2/2, 100.0)
Antifungal treatment (CNS non-involvement)
N = 45 N = 37
FCZ 29 (64.4) 30 (81.1) NA 24 (24/29, 82.8) 30 (30/30, 100.0) 0.024
VCZ 5 (11.1) 5 (13.5) 4 (4/5, 80.0) 5 (5/5, 100.0) NA
Itraconazole 3 (6.7) 1 (2.7) 2 (2/3, 66.7) 1 (2/2, 100.0) NA
AmB + 5-FC 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 0 NA
AmB + FCZ/VCZ 5 (11.1) 0 (0.0) 3 (3/5, 60.0) 0 NA
FCZ/VCZ + 5-FC 2 (4.4) 1 (2.7) 1 (1/2, 50.0) 1 (1/1, 100.0) NA
AmB + FCZ/VCZ + 5-FC 1 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (1/1, 100.0) 0 NA
Outcome
Improved 53 (56.4) 42 (100.0) 0.000
Failure 41 (43.6) 0 (0.0)

AmB: amphotericin B; FCZ: fluconazole; VCZ: voriconazole; 5-FC: 5 fluorocytosine; NA:not applied.

Radiologic outcomes after treatment

The available follow-up chest CT time in our hospital for immunocompromised patients was from 0.25 to 45 months, and 0.5 to 73 months for immunocompetent patients. After 3 months of treatment, 26 immunocompromised patients and 15 immunocompetent patients had follow-up chest CT scans in our hospital, 92.7% (38/41) of them have improved imaging findings. The time difference of CT imaging improvement in two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05) (see Table 6). The gradual radiologic improvement was found in the 43 patients who were treated with antifungal drugs even after their drug therapy was stopped. At the end of the follow-up period, complete radiologic remission could be found only in the six patients who underwent surgical resection. All the other patients had some residual abnormalities (such as high-density shadow, nodular shadow, pleural thickening, adhesion) and/or fibrotic scars. Figure 2 showed the changes of chest CT lesions during the follow-up of an immunocompromised patient with PC.

Table 6.

Radiologic outcomes after 3 months of treatment in immunocompetent and immunocompromised pulmonary cryptococcosis patients.

Follow-up chest CT scans Immunocompromised Patients (N = 29) Immunocompetent Patients (N = 21) P-value
Follow-up patients 26 15 NA
Improved patients 24 14 NA
The time of improvement (month) 0.25–3 0.5–3 0.623

NA: not applied.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pulmonary cryptococcosis in a 42-year-old woman with nephrotic syndrome and endometrial cancer after hysterectomy. CT imaging shows patchy consolidation in the left lower lobe of the lung (a). The lesion was significantly reduced after two months of treatment with fluconazole/voriconazole plus 5-fluorocytosine (b). The lesion continued to shrink after five months of treatment (c). The drug was discontinued after 13 months of treatment (d). The focus continued to shrink and there were still irregular soft tissue mass after 16 months (e) and 29 months (f) of drug withdrawal.

Discussion

Cryptococcosis is a potentially serious fungal infection and it mainly occurs in immunocompromised populations such as HIV positive patients16. This study also found that PC is more likely to occur in immunocompromised hosts. In this study, 69.1% (94/136) of the patients were immunocompromised. However, many previous studies have reported that cryptococcosis was more common in immunocompetent patients in China1719. Another recent report showed 40.4% PC patients had normal immune function12. Although some patients with cryptococcosis seemed to be immunocompetent, some immune gene characteristics such as mannose-binding lectin (MBL) polymorphisms, FCGR (Fc-gamma receptors FccRs coding genes) 2B 232I/T genotype, FccRIIB polymorphisms, specific immunological status and/or a particular lifestyle were associated with these individuals810,20. Producing abundant anti-GM-CSF antibodies to perturb the function of phagocytes and macrophages maybe another impressionable factor for cryptococcosis in otherwise immunocompetent patients21,22. Animal experiments had shown that humoral immunodeficiency mice were susceptible to C. neoformans23. Therefore, how to correctly evaluate immune function of patients is a problem that needs to be solved. The high peak age of the patients with PC was from 31 to 60 years (92/136, 67.6%), regardless of their immune status. For immunocompetent patients, they may have more exposure to cryptococcal spores such as direct or indirect exposure to pigeon droppings and fungal contaminants at that age.

The common clinical manifestations of PC patients were cough, expectoration, fever, chest pain and shortness of breath. Headache, vomiting, altered mental status could occur in patients with meningitis. Immunocompromised patients without CNS involvement were more prone to have cough and fever, immunocompetent patients without CNS involvement were more likely to be asymptomatic, which is similar to previous research results19,24,25. HIV infections, immunosuppressant utilization and autoimmune diseases were common predisposing factors for immunocompromised patients. Many previous reports had similar results17,26. However, a review report showed tuberculosis and liver diseases were also the common underlying diseases in cryptococcosis in China27. Impaired cellular immune function is a common feature of these patients2830. CD4+ T lymphocytes play an important role in the prevention of cryptococcus infection. Impaired T lymphocyte function may affect chemotaxis of granulocytes and macrophages and clearance of Cryptococcus31.

The most frequent imaging findings of PC were pulmonary nodules and patchy shadows. As a result, most patients were misdiagnosed as bacterial pneumonia and received antibiotic treatment before they were diagnosed with cryptococcosis. Host immune status is an important influencing factor for chest CT findings of PC. Extensive pulmonary involvement and cavitation were significantly more common in immunocompromised patients than immunocompetent patients in this study. Similar results were reported in many previous reports7,32,33. However more cases were included in our study. Except for bacterial pneumonia, our study also found that immunocompromised PC patients were more susceptible to be misdiagnosed as tuberculosis and immunocompetent PC patients might be misdiagnosed as tumor. A previous study showed that PC was often misdiagnosed as tumors and tuberculosis based on CT signs34. Cryptococcus spores (2–3 µm in diameter) or less encapsulated yeast cells are easily inhaled into the bronchioles and terminal bronchioles, where they were engulfed by macrophages and formed granulomas below the pleura. Inflammatory cell infiltration could lead to vasculitis and ultimately cause coagulative necrosis. Thus, cavities were observed on CT34. In short, the radiological presentations of PC are diverse and nonspecific, hence these patients were easily misdiagnosed.

Positive culture for Cryptococcus is the most accurate mean of confirming the diagnosis of cryptococcosis. However, due to the previous low vigilance against fungal infections, the rate of culture detection was low. Histopathological examination is a sensitive method for confirming cryptococcosis28. More than half of the patients in this study were diagnosed by histopathology. Some noninvasive diagnostic tests such as CrAg test have been gradually applied to clinical practice in recent years. Some patients in our group underwent CrAg test (data not shown), which had helped us to consider cryptococcosis diagnosis. Increasing number of detection methods have led to an increase in the detection rate of cryptococcosis. Perhaps this is also a cause of the increased incidence of cryptococcosis in recent years, even in the case of a reduction in HIV-associated cryptococcosis with extensive antiretroviral therapy (ART) treatment. Our study also showed more immunocompromised patients were diagnosed with percutaneous lung biopsy, while immunocompetent patients were more likely to be diagnosed by surgical lung biopsy. Most of the previous studies only showed the diagnostic methods and diagnostic procedures related to PC7,35,36, and few studies compared the differences in methods for obtaining tissue samples during pathological diagnosis of PC patients with different immune status. It is possible that immunocompromised patients have more extensive lung lesions and worse conditions, so percutaneous lung puncture with less invasion is selected. The imaging manifestations of some immunocompetent patients were single lesions. They were suspected to be lung cancer and were admitted to the department of thoracic surgery for surgical resection of the lesion. Therefore, more immunocompetent patients were confirmed by surgical lung biopsy. For patients with a single lung lesion, noninvasive diagnostic tests including CrAg test and tumor markers should be combined to consider the possible diagnosis of these patients, and initial invasive operation should be carefully selected.

Our research also showed the length of time from onset of symptoms to treatment/ diagnosis did not affect the treatment outcome. The length of the time often depends on the severity of patient’s symptoms. Some patients still could achieve better therapeutic efficacy even if their treatment was delayed. Most of these patients have mild or no symptoms, which generally developed slowly. Maybe the severity of the disease is a more important impact factor on the treatment outcome than the timely treatment. Most PC patients were treated with antifungal drugs alone. Nine patients did not receive antifungal therapy because by the time the diagnosis was made they were running out of time for treatment. Antifungal therapy is the main treatment for cryptococcosis13,14,37. Out of the overall 136 cases, 104 patients were treated with antifungal drugs alone and had good response. For PC patients without CNS involvement, our data suggested that fluconazole monotherapy has a good clinical effect. The most commonly used induction therapy is amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine with fluconazole or voriconazole in our patients with CNS involvement. This treatment combination has rarely been mentioned in previous studies, especially in HIV-negative patients7,28. On the other hand, the treatment duration of induction therapy is also a concern. Because, in our experience, induction therapy with amphotericin B plus 5-flucytosine and induction therapy lasting less than 4 weeks often lead to treatment failure, especially for immunocompromised patients, with continuous positive smear of Cryptococcus in CSF and continuous high titer test of CrAg. Maybe because of the methods we used to manage the elevated intracranial pressure were different from the ways the guidelines recommend13,14. Mannitol was used more often than percutaneous lumbar drainage or ventriculoperitoneal shunt to reduce intracranial pressure in our clinical practice because secondary infection and pipe blockage are common clinical problems after catheterization. Induction therapy with voriconazole plus 5-flucytosine also had a good therapeutic effect in the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in this study. A previous study has shown that voriconazole was superior to other antifungal drugs in controlling cryptococcal infections38. Voriconazole has unique advantages in anti-Cryptococcus including impeding the formation of Cryptococcus virulence factor melanin, increasing the inhibition and scavenging effect of immune effector cells on Cryptococcus, rare drug resistance and maximum synergistic effect with flucytosine3943. Therefore, for patients with cryptococcosis, voriconazole is an alternative, especially those with impaired renal function or those who cannot tolerate amphotericin B. Further researches are needed.

The available chest CT follow-up time varied widely according to patient compliance and illness. A total of 38 patients (38/41, 92.7%) showed improvement in chest imaging within three months, and one patient showed improvement in chest CT after one week of treatment. One problem here is whether antifungal drugs can be discontinued in patients with PC when the imaging is still partially abnormal after a period of treatment44. Our research showed that radiographic abnormalities would gradually improve even if antifungal drugs were discontinued. Until the end of follow-up, most nonsurgical patients still had some residual radiographic abnormalities, similar to those found in tuberculosis45, which may be related to the displacement or drainage of necrotic lung parenchyma and/or fungal gelatinous aggregation46. However, some previous studies have shown that complete remission was possible in most patients7,45. Other studies also showed that complete radiologic remission is difficult to achieve after drug therapy for PC patients47,48.

This study has some limitations. First, it was a retrospective study and only part of patients had complete follow-up data. Second, the detection rate of tissue culture after surgical resection was low, and the pathological diagnosis was mainly determined by morphology and special staining. It is important to raise the awareness of all doctors, especially surgeons, about tissue culture or molecular etiological diagnosis.

Conclusions

This study showed that the most common chest CT manifestations in patients with PC were pulmonary nodules and patchy shadows. PC was easily misdiagnosed as tuberculosis in immunocompromised patients, while those immunocompetent patients were more likely to be misdiagnosed as tumor according to imaging findings. Initial invasive operation should be carefully selected in immunocompetent patients with a single lung lesion to reduce unnecessary lobectomy. Most PC patients without CNS involvement had good clinical outcomes with fluconazole monotherapy, especially the immunocompetent patients. The chest imaging abnormalities in PC patients might continue to improve after a period of treatment.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff in Information Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University for data retrieval. This work is supported by Scientific research project of Sichuan provincial health and family planning commission of China (grant number: 17ZD015), 1•3•5 project for disciplines of excellence-Clinical Research Incubation Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (grant number: 2018HXFH037).

Author contributions

X.J.L. and J.Y.Q. conceived and designed the study, X.L.Z., Y.L. and X.J.L. participated in acquisition and analysis of data, J.Y.Q., X.L.Z. and Y.L. wrote the paper. All authors have seen and approved the final version.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Rajasingham R, et al. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: An updated analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017;17:873–881. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30243-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sui X, et al. Clinical features of pulmonary cryptococcosis in thin-section CT in immunocompetent and non-AIDS immunocompromised patients. Radiol. Med. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01088-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Velagapudi R, Hsueh YP, Geunes-Boyer S, Wright JR, Heitman J. Spores as infectious propagules of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 2009;77:4345–4355. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00542-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Galanis, E., Macdougall, L., Kidd, S. & Morshed, M., British Columbia Cryptococcus gattii Working Group. Epidemiology of Cryptococcus gattii, British Columbia, Canada, 1999–2007. Emerg. Infect. Dis.16, 251–257 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Hagen F, et al. Recognition of seven species in the Cryptococcus gattii/ Cryptococcus neoformans species complex. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015;78:16–48. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen M, et al. Epidemiology of fungal infections in China. Front. Med. 2018;12:58–75. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0601-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang Y, et al. Clinical analysis of 76 patients pathologically diagnosed with pulmonary cryptococcosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2012;40:1191–200. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00168011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ou XT, et al. Genotypes coding for mannose-binding lectin deficiency correlated with cryptococcal meningitisin HIV-uninfected Chinese patients. J. Infect. Dis. 2011;203:1686–1691. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hu XP, et al. Association of Fcγ receptor IIB polymorphism with cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-uninfected Chinese patients. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meletiadis J, et al. Study of common functional genetic polymorphisms of FCGR2A, 3 A and 3B genes and the risk for cryptococcosis in HIV-uninfected patients. Med. Mycol. 2007;45:513–518. doi: 10.1080/13693780701390140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fang W, Fa Z, Liao W. Epidemiology of Cryptococcus and cryptococcosis in China. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015;78:7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hou X, et al. Pulmonary cryptococcosis characteristics in immunocompetent patients-A 20-year clinicalretrospective analysis in China. Mycoses. 2019;62:937–944. doi: 10.1111/myc.12966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saag MS, et al. Practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000;30:710–718. doi: 10.1086/313757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Perfect JR, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012;50:291–322. doi: 10.1086/649858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012;10:486–489. doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kiertiburanakul S, Wirojtananugoon S, Pracharktam R, Sungkanuparph S. Cryptococcosis in human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2006;10:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2004.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tseng HK, et al. Microbiological, epidemiological, and clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with cryptococcosis in Taiwan, 1997–2010. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen J, et al. Cryptococcus neoformans strains and infection in apparently immunocompetent patients, China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008;14:755–762. doi: 10.3201/eid1405.071312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu K, et al. Clinical analysis of non-AIDS patients pathologically diagnosed with pulmonary cryptococcosis. J. Thorac. Dis. 2016;8:2813–2821. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Del, Poeta M, Casadevall A. Ten challenges on Cryptococcus and cryptococcosis. Mycopathologia. 2012;173:303–310. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9473-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rosen LB, et al. Anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies in patients with cryptococcal meningitis. J. Immunol. 2013;190:3959–3966. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saijo T, et al. Anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies are a risk factor for central nervous system infection by Cryptococcus gattii in otherwise immunocompetent patients. MBio. 2014;5:e00912–14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00912-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Subramaniam KS, et al. The absence of serum IgM enhances the susceptibility of mice to pulmonary challenge with Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Immunol. 2010;184:5755–5767. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xie, X. et al. Clinical analysis of pulmonary cryptococcosis in non-HIV patients in south China. Int J Clin Exp Med 8, 3114-9, eCollection (2015). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.He Q, et al. Clinical features of pulmonary cryptococcosis among patients with different levels of peripheral blood CD4+ T lymphocyte counts. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017;17:768. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2865-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liao CH, et al. Different presentations and outcomes between HIV-infected and HIV uninfected patients with cryptococcal meningitis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2012;45:296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2011.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yuchong C, et al. Cryptococcosis in China (1985–2010): review of cases from Chinese database. Mycopathologia. 2012;173:329–335. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9471-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maziarz EK, Perfect JR. Cryptococcosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. North. Am. 2016;30:179–206. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ferrari C. HBV and the immune response. Liver Int. 2015;35:121–128. doi: 10.1111/liv.12749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mayer-Barber KD, Barber DL. Innate and adaptive cellular immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015;5:a018424. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mukaremera L, Nielsen K. Adaptive immunity to Cryptococcus neoformans infections. J. Fungi. 2017;3:64. doi: 10.3390/jof3040064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xie LX, Chen YS, Liu SY, Shi YX. Pulmonary cryptococcosis: comparison of CT findings in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Acta Radiol. 2015;56:447–453. doi: 10.1177/0284185114529105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hu Z, et al. Radiological characteristics of pulmonary cryptococcosis in HIV-infected patients. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0173858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang D, et al. Comparative study of primary pulmonary cryptococcosis with multiple nodules or masses by CT and pathology. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018;16:4437–4444. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ye F, et al. Retrospective analysis of 76 immunocompetent patients with primary pulmonary cryptococcosis. Lung. 2012;190:339–346. doi: 10.1007/s00408-011-9362-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Perfect JR, Bicanic T. Cryptococcosis diagnosis and treatment: What do we know now. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015;78:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Skolnik K, Huston S, Mody CH. Cryptococcal lung infections. Clin. Chest Med. 2017;38:451–464. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2017.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Perfect JR, et al. Voriconazole treatment for less-common, emerging, or refractory fungal infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003;36:1122–1131. doi: 10.1086/374557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Martinez LR, Ntiamoah P, Gácser A, Casadevall A, Nosanchuk JD. Voriconazole inhibits melanization in Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007;51:4396–4400. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00376-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chiller T, Farrokhshad K, Brummer E, Stevens DA. Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on polymorphonuclear neutrophils, monocytes or monocyte-derived macrophages combined with voriconazole against Cryptococcus neoformans. Med. Mycol. 2002;40:21–26. doi: 10.1080/mmy.40.1.21.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pfaller MA, et al. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2007: 10.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of noncandidal yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:117–123. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01747-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Perkins A, et al. Rates of antifungal resistance among Spanish clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005;56:1144–1147. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schwarz P, Dromer F, Lortholary O, Dannaoui E. In vitro interaction of flucytosine with conventional and new antifungals against Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003;47:3361–3364. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3361-3364.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fisher, J. F., Valencia-Rey, P. A. & Davis, W. B. Pulmonary cryptococcosis in the immunocompetent patient-many questions, some answers. Open Forum Infect Dis3, ofw167 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Roy M, Ellis S. Radiologic diagnosis and follow-up of pulmonary tuberculosis. Postgrad. Med. J. 2010;86:663–674. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.084418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Suwatanapongched T, Sangsatra W, Boonsarngsuk V, Watcharananan SP, Incharoen P. Clinical and radiologic manifestations of pulmonary cryptococcosis in immunocompetentpatients and their outcomes after treatment. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2013;19:438–446. doi: 10.5152/dir.2013.13049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Song KD, et al. Pulmonary cryptococcosis: imaging findings in 23 non-AIDS patients. Korean J. Radiol. 2010;11:407–416. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.4.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chang WC, et al. Pulmonary cryptococcosis: comparison of clinical and radiographic characteristics in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Chest. 2006;29:333–340. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.2.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES