Abstract
Background
Studies on self-employment and cardiovascular risk are very limited. We examined the relationship between self-employment and cardiovascular risk among the general population in the United States from 1999 to 2016.
Methods
Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we identified all patients with hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), diabetes mellitus (DM), stroke, heart failure (HF), and coronary artery disease (CAD) between 1999 and 2016. Type of job was defined based on the participant's response to the survey question as “an employee of a private company, business, or individual for wages, salary, or commission” or “self-employed in own business, professional practice or farm”. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for confounders.
Results
Of 30,103 patients, 2835 (9.4%) were self-employed in their own business, professional practice, or farm and 27,268 (90.6%) were employed by a private company, business, or government. After adjusting for age, race, sex, BMI, marital status, educational level, health insurance status, smoking status, sleep duration and lipid profiles, self-employed individuals had a higher prevalence of HTN (OR: 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.20), HLD (OR: 1.10; 95% CI 1.07–1.31), stroke (OR: 1.45; 95% CI 1.27–1.67), HF (OR: 1.17; 95% CI 1.03–1.32), and CAD (OR: 1.26; 95% CI 1.13–1.35) (all P v< 0.05).
Conclusions
Self-employment may be associated with greater cardiovascular risk in the US general population. Further prospective studies are urgently needed to establish the optimal preventive strategy to reduce cardiovascular risk in self-employed individuals.
Keywords: Self-employment, Cardiovascular risk, Business owner, Professional practice
Highlights
-
•
Self-employment may be associated with cardiovascular risk in the US general
population
-
•
Self-employed individuals may encounter work-related adversity, leading to
cardiovascular risk
-
•
Further prospective studies and clinical trials are urgently needed to establish the optimal preventive strategy for reducing cardiovascular risk associated with self-employment
1. Introduction
Governments worldwide are trying to encourage self-employment to boost growth and enhance business to become a priority in contemporary economies. Studies have shown that self-employment may lead to adversity and was associated with being prescribed anxiolytics [1,2]. However, studies on self-employment and cardiovascular risk are very limited and inconsistent [[3], [4], [5], [6]]. Farmers, for example, tend to have less cardiovascular risk [5] than other occupational groups, while self-employed professionals have a greater observed all-cause mortality than employed professionals in the USA [7]. Financial instability, social isolation, unstable working schedule, operational issues, work-related stress, economic insecurity, and local policies could be mechanisms by which self-employment could lead to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, depending on the exact nature of the business [8]. Most importantly, occasional natural disasters (e.g., floods, hurricanes, tornadoes) or infectious disease outbreaks (e.g., COVID-19) may cause business interruption due to operational costs (e.g., inventory, event cancellation, rent, supply chain losses, exposure liabilities, or employee compensation). This study sought to investigate associations between self-employment and cardiovascular risk using the NHANES survey between 1999 and 2016.
2. Methods
The NHANES survey, a series of complex and multistage surveys of general health, employment characteristics, nutritional status, lifestyle factors, and laboratory values, was conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) along with the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/). Data from 9 NHANES cohorts (1999–2000, 2001–2002, 2003–2004, 2005–2006, 2007–2008, 2009–2010, 2011–2012, 2013–2014, 2015–2016) were merged. All participants signed consent for participation, and the National Center for Health Statistics Research Ethics Review Board reviewed and approved the NHANES survey.
We compared differences amongst those who were self-employed in their own business, professional practice, or farm and those who were employed by a private company, business, or government. The primary outcomes were the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia (HLD), hypertension (HTN), coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), and stroke, defined based on the participant's response to survey questions, between self-employed and employed individuals. (Online Supplementary Table 1). The main question was used as the inclusion criteria for the study sample. Type of job was defined based on the participant's response to the survey question: ‘Which of these best describes your job or work situation?’ The participant's response as “an employee of a private company, business, or individual for wages, salary, or commission”, “self-employed in own business, professional practice or farm” were included. Respondents who responded, “don't know” or “refused” for the question were excluded. We reported continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation. We performed multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, race, sex, BMI, marital status, educational level, health insurance coverage, smoking status, sleep duration, and lipid profiles. R 3.4.0 and Stata version 14.2 were used for analyses.
3. Results
A total of 30,103 patients who represented the total US civilian, non-institutionalized population of 299.3 million people between 1999 and 2016 were included: 2,835 (9.4%) were self-employed in their own business, professional practice, or farm, and 27,268 (90.6%) were employed by a private company, business, or government. Self-employed individuals were older, more likely to be male, had higher systolic, diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL cholesterol levels than employed individuals (all p-values < 0.0001). Compared with employed individuals, those who were self-employed had a higher reported prevalence of DM, HTN, HLD, stroke, HF, and CAD (all p-values < 0.05) (Table 1). After adjusting for age, race, sex, BMI, marital status, educational level, health insurance status, smoking status, sleep duration and lipid profiles, self-employed individuals had a higher prevalence of HTN (OR: 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.20), HLD (OR: 1.10; 95% CI 1.07–1.31), stroke (OR: 1.45; 95% CI 1.27–1.67), HF (OR: 1.17; 95% CI 1.03–1.32), CAD (OR: 1.26; 95% CI 1.13–1.35), compared with employed individuals (all p-values < 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of individuals with vs. without self-employment in own business, professional practice, or farm.
Variables | Self-employed |
P value∗ | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes (n = 2,835) | No (n = 27,268) | ||
Age (years) | 48.5 ± 14.9 | 38.9 ± 14.9 | <0.0001 |
Women | 36.1% | 47.7% | <0.0001 |
BMI | 28.3 ± 5.8 | 28.3 ± 6.6 | 0.99 |
White | 53.4% | 40.6% | <0.0001 |
Marital Status (married) | 62.5% | 47.4% | <0.0001 |
Education: above college | 27.9% | 23.1% | <0.0001 |
Health insurance coverage | 66.1% | 76.3% | <0.0001 |
Heart failure | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.0001 |
Coronary artery disease | 2.8% | 1.2% | <0.0001 |
Stroke | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.0010 |
Hypertension | 21.2% | 16.1% | <0.0001 |
Diabetes mellitus | 7.9% | 5.8% | <0.0001 |
Hyperlipidemia | 28.2% | 21.2% | <0.0001 |
Total cholesterol level (mg/dL) | 199.9 ± 42.9 | 191.3 ± 40.9 | <0.0001 |
Direct HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 52.6 ± 16.5 | 52.7 ± 15.6 | 0.74 |
Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 136.5 ± 127.4 | 120.7 ± 101.7 | <0.0001 |
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 118.3 ± 35.1 | 112.8 ± 34.3 | <0.0001 |
How much sleep do you get (hours)? | 6.9 ± 2.6 | 6.7 ± 1.4 | <0.0001 |
Table 2.
Multiple logistic regression for self-employed in own business, professional practice or farm.
Variable | Self-employed in own business, professional practice, or farm |
|
---|---|---|
Adjusted OR [95% CI] | Adjusted P value | |
Heart failure | ||
No adjustment | 1.82 (1.68–1.98) | <0.0001 |
Multivariable adjusted | 1.17 (1.03–1.32) | 0.02 |
Coronary artery disease | ||
No adjustment | 1.74 (1.64–1.84) | <0.0001 |
Multivariable adjusted | 1.26 (1.13–1.35) | <0.0001 |
Stroke | ||
No adjustment | 1.42 (1.31–1.54) | <0.0001 |
Multivariable adjusted | 1.45 (1.27–1.67) | <0.0001 |
Diabetes | ||
No adjustment | 1.36 (1.32–1.41) | <0.0001 |
Multivariable adjusted | 0.97 (0.93–1.04) | 0.30 |
Hyperlipidemia | ||
No adjustment | 1.29 (1.26–1.31) | <0.0001 |
Multivariable adjusted | 1.10 (1.07–1.14) | <0.0001 |
Hypertension | ||
No adjustment | 1.71 (1.64–1.78) | <0.0001 |
Multivariable adjusted | 1.12 (1.05–1.20) | 0.001 |
Multivariable adjusted for age, race, sex, BMI, marital status, educational level, health insurance status, smoking status, sleep duration, and lipid profiles.
4. Discussion
In the present study using a large-scale national survey, we found that self-employed individuals had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risks, including HLD, HTN, stroke, HF, and CAD in the contemporary US population. Self-employed individuals may encounter adversity such as financial management (e.g., very low-profit margin, rent, lack of funding/line of credit, high customer acquisition cost), work-related stress, unstable working schedule (e.g., working on weekends, no time for annual physical, or routine doctor visits), operational problems (e.g., inability to control expenses or overexpansion), local policies, and a lack of essential health insurance, leading to cardiovascular risk [1,[9], [10], [11], [12]]. [13] Studies have shown that, compared with employed individuals, self-employed individuals are likely to be dedicated, self-determined [14,15], have high workloads [16], a strong work-commitment [17], low support [18], economic insecurity [19], and be more motivated to engage with their work [20], resulting in insufficient time and effort into their health (e.g., unhealthy diet and lifestyle). A previously published study showed that self-employed individuals, particularly those with small business owners, were probably exposed to socioeconomic instability and unstable working conditions, compared with employed individuals [21]. Another possibility is that a majority of self-employment may be forced self-employment, and therefore forced self-employment may have high stress and high burden, resulting in cardiovascular risk. However, given the nature of the observational study, correlation does not imply causation. The existence of co-existing or pre-existing medical conditions in some people may prevent job employment or lead to forced self-employment. Several studies showed that individuals who have pre-existing medical conditions such as HTN, DM, CAD are associated with problems in obtaining employment. In addition, pre-existing medical conditions are associated with self-reported job insecurity [[22], [23], [24], [25]]. However, in this cohort, we could not differentiate between selective self-employment or forced self-employment. A prior study suggested that involuntary job loss can be considered as a cardiovascular risk factor [26], while selective self-employment is associated with better health status than forced self-employment because of healthy people perhaps self-selected into self-employment [2]. Moreover, a subgroup of forced self-employment may already have underlying diseases, chronic illness, or mental disabilities and, therefore, could not work as an employee. Most importantly, occasional natural disasters (e.g., floods, hurricanes, tornadoes) or infectious disease outbreaks (e.g., COVID-19 or 1918 influenza pandemics) may turn employed individuals towards forced self-employment and damage business owners due to event cancellation, supply chain losses, or exposure liabilities.
However, these factors are probably dependent on the company and a country's work culture, local and national policy. For example, known as an intense work culture in Japan, a study in the Japanese population showed no significant difference in cardiovascular risk and mortality between employed individuals and self-employed [27]. In contrast, a study reported that self-employed individuals in European countries are more satisfied with their lives than employed individuals [28]. The self-employed had better self-rated health and workability than employed individuals in the Netherlands [29], while higher cardiovascular mortality among self-employed men and women than among other occupational classes in Sweden [5]. As such, it is important to understand these differences to promote a healthy work culture among self-employed individuals in the US.
The present study has certain limitations. First, there may be residual or unmeasured confounders due to undiagnosed or latent risk factors. For example, the exact mechanisms that underlie the association between self-employment and cardiovascular risk may be confounded by other lifestyle factors (e.g., unhealthy diet, infrequent exercise, poor sleep hygiene, or long working hours). Second, this analysis was cross-sectional in nature, and therefore we could not infer causality. Third, as discussed earlier, those with poor health status, particularly established cardiovascular risk, may be forced into self-employment. Last, we could not find a difference in job details. One study [30] showed mortality is lower among those self-employed who run a limited liability company than among paid employees.
5. Conclusion
We found a significant association between self-employment and a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risks, including DM, HTN, HLD, HF, stroke, and CAD, than in the US general population. Further prospective studies are urgently needed to establish the optimal preventive strategy for reducing cardiovascular risk in self-employed individuals.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Chayakrit Krittanawong: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Anirudh Kumar: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Data curation. Zhen Wang: Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Validation. Usman Baber: Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Investigation, Resources. Deepak L. Bhatt: Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Conceptualization, Methodology.
Declaration of Competing Interest
Dr. Chayakrit Krittanawong discloses the following relationships – Journal of the American Heart Association (Early Career Editorial board); The Journal of Scientific Innovation in Medicine (Associate Editor); Member of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. Dr. Deepak L. Bhatt discloses the following relationships - Advisory Board: Cardax, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, LevelEx, Medscape Cardiology, PhaseBio, PLX Pharma, Regado Biosciences; Board of Directors: Boston VA Research Institute, Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, TobeSoft; Chair: American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; Data Monitoring Committees: Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo), Population Health Research Institute; Honoraria: American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org Vice-Chair, ACC Accreditation Committee), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today's Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees); Other: Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); Research Funding: Abbott, Afimmune, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardax, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Synaptic, The Medicines Company; Royalties: Elsevier (Editor, Cardiovascular Intervention: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease); Site Co-Investigator: Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Svelte; Trustee: American College of Cardiology; Unfunded Research: FlowCo, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Takeda. None of the other authors have any disclosures
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100035.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is/are the supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Dahl M.S., Nielsen J., Mojtabai R. The effects of becoming an entrepreneur on the use of psychotropics among entrepreneurs and their spouses. Scand. J. Publ. Health. 2010;38:857–863. doi: 10.1177/1403494810375490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rietveld C.A., van Kippersluis H., Thurik A.R. Self-employment and health: barriers or benefits? Health Econ. 2015;24:1302–1313. doi: 10.1002/hec.3087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fujino Y., Iso H., Tamakoshi A. A prospective cohort study of employment status and mortality from circulatory disorders among Japanese workers. J. Occup. Health. 2005;47:510–517. doi: 10.1539/joh.47.510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yoon J., Bernell S.L. The effect of self-employment on health, access to care, and health behavior. Health. 2013;5:2116. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vagero D., Norell S.E. Mortality and social class in Sweden-exploring a new epidemiological tool. Scand. J. Soc. Med. 1989;17:49–58. doi: 10.1177/140349488901700109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Annink A., den Dulk L., Steijn B. Work-family conflict among employees and the self-employed across europe. Soc. Indicat. Res. 2016;126:571–593. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0899-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Muntaner C., Hadden W.C., Kravets N. Social class, race/ethnicity and all-cause mortality in the US: longitudinal results from the 1986-1994 National Health Interview Survey. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2004;19:777–784. doi: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000036569.39399.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Udell J.A., Steg P.G., Scirica B.M. Living alone and cardiovascular risk in outpatients at risk of or with atherothrombosis. Arch. Intern. Med. 2012;172:1086–1095. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kivimaki M., Jokela M., Nyberg S.T. Long working hours and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data for 603,838 individuals. Lancet. 2015;386:1739–1746. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60295-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schonfeld I.S., Mazzola J.J. A qualitative study of stress in individuals self-employed in solo businesses. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2015;20:501–513. doi: 10.1037/a0038804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van der Hulst M. Long workhours and health. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health. 2003;29:171–188. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zissimopoulos J.M., Karoly L.A. Transitions to self-employment at older ages: the role of wealth, health, health insurance and other factors. Lab. Econ. 2007;14:269–295. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Monheit A.C., Harvey P.H. Sources of health insurance for the self employed: does differential taxation make a difference? Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. 1993;30:293–305. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nordenmark M., Vinberg S., Strandh M. Job control and demands, work-life balance and wellbeing among self-employed men and women in Europe. Vulnerable Groups Inclusion. 2012;3:18896. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stephan U., Roesler U. Health of entrepreneurs versus employees in a national representative sample. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2010;83:717–738. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hyytinen A., Ruuskanen O.P. Time use of the self-employed. Kyklos. 2007;60:105–122. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Binder M., Coad A. Life satisfaction and self-employment: a matching approach. Small Bus. Econ. 2013;40:1009–1033. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Syrett M. Independent professionals (IPros) and well-being: an emerging focus for research? J. Manag. Organ. 2016;22:817–825. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Annink A., Gorgievski M., Den Dulk L. Financial hardship and well-being: a cross-national comparison among the European self-employed. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 2016;25:645–657. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dijkhuizen J., Gorgievski M., van Veldhoven M., Schalk R. Feeling successful as an entrepreneur: a job demands—resources approach. Int. Enterpren. Manag. J. 2016;12:555–573. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Min J.-Y., Kim H.-J., Min K.-B. Self-employment’s vulnerability to socioeconomic and working conditions: results from the Korean Working Condition Survey (2006-2014) J. Global Health Rep. 2019;3 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Murphy M.B. Blood pressure and fitness for work. Am. J. Hypertens. 1992;5:253–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Robinson N., Yateman N.A., Protopapa L.E., Bush L. Employment problems and diabetes. Diabet. Med. 1990;7:16–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1990.tb01300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee S., Colditz G.A., Berkman L.F., Kawachi I. Prospective study of job insecurity and coronary heart disease in US women. Ann. Epidemiol. 2004;14:24–30. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(03)00074-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tunceli K., Bradley C.J., Nerenz D., Williams L.K., Pladevall M., Elston Lafata J. The impact of diabetes on employment and work productivity. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2662–2667. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gallo W.T., Bradley E.H., Falba T.A. Involuntary job loss as a risk factor for subsequent myocardial infarction and stroke: findings from the Health and Retirement Survey. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2004;45:408–416. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Okuda N., Kadota A., Nishi N. Association of work situation with cardiovascular disease mortality risk among working-age Japanese men- A 20-year follow-up of NIPPON DATA90. Circ. J. : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2019;83:1506–1513. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hessels J., Arampatzi E., van der Zwan P., Burger M. Life satisfaction and self-employment in different types of occupations. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2018;25:734–740. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sewdas R., Tamminga S.J., Boot C.R.L., van den Heuvel S.G., de Boer A.G., van der Beek A.J. Differences in self-rated health and work ability between self-employed workers and employees: results from a prospective cohort study in The Netherlands. PloS One. 2018;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206618. e0206618-e0206618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Toivanen S., Griep R.H., Mellner C., Vinberg S., Eloranta S. Mortality differences between self-employed and paid employees: a 5-year follow-up study of the working population in Sweden. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016;73:627–636. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.