Abstract
Background
Precise regulation of neural precursor cell (NPC) proliferation and differentiation is essential to ensure proper brain development and function. The HCFC1 gene encodes a transcriptional co-factor that regulates cell proliferation, and previous studies suggest that HCFC1 regulates NPC number and differentiation. However, the molecular mechanism underlying these cellular deficits has not been completely characterized.
Methods
Here we created a zebrafish harboring mutations in the hcfc1a gene (the hcfc1aco60/+ allele), one ortholog of HCFC1, and utilized immunohistochemistry and RNA-sequencing technology to understand the function of hcfc1a during neural development.
Results
The hcfc1aco60/+ allele results in an increased number of NPCs and increased expression of neuronal and glial markers. These neural developmental deficits are associated with larval hypomotility and the abnormal expression of asxl1, a polycomb transcription factor, which we identified as a downstream effector of hcfc1a. Inhibition of asxl1 activity and/or expression in larvae harboring the hcfc1aco60/+ allele completely restored the number of NPCs to normal levels.
Conclusion
Collectively, our data demonstrate that hcfc1a regulates NPC number, NPC proliferation, motor behavior, and brain development.
Keywords: HCFC1, Neural precursor cells (NPCs), Brain development, asxl1
Background
Neural precursor cells (NPCs) give rise to the differentiated cells of the central nervous system and defects in the number produced, their proliferation, and/or survival can result in a variety of neural developmental disorders. These disorders include intellectual disability [1], cognitive dysfunction [2], behavioral impairment [3], microcephaly [4], epilepsy [5], autism spectrum disorders [6], and cortical malformations [7]. Previous studies have demonstrated a complex network of transcription factors that are responsible for modulating NPC function including SOX2 [8], SOX1 [9], NESTIN [10], and PAX transcription factors [11]. Recent evidence suggests that the HCFC1 gene, which encodes a transcriptional cofactor, is essential for stem cell proliferation and metabolism [12, 13] in a variety of different tissue types, including NPCs [14–17]. These data strongly suggest that HCFC1 is part of a more global transcriptional program modulating NPC proliferation and differentiation.
HCFC1 regulates a diverse array of target genes and has been shown to bind to the promoters of more than 5000 unique downstream target genes [18]. Consequently, the molecular mechanisms by which HCFC1 regulates NPC proliferation and differentiation are complex. Mutations in HCFC1 cause methylmalonic acidemia and homocysteinemia, cblX type (cblX) (309541). cblX is an X-linked recessive disorder characterized by defects in cobalamin (vitamin B12) metabolism, nervous system development, neurological impairment, intractable epilepsy, and failure to thrive [19]. Functional analysis of cblX syndrome has provided a platform whereby the function HCFC1 in discrete organs and tissues can be elucidated. For example, in vitro analysis has demonstrated that HCFC1 regulates metabolism indirectly by regulating the expression of the MMACHC gene [12, 14, 15, 19]. These data are further supported by in vivo analysis using transient knockdown in the developing zebrafish [16, 20]. Additional mouse models exist and have demonstrated a function for HCFC1 in diverse cell populations [21, 22], including a subset of NPCs [17]. However, although it is clear that HCFC1 is essential for NPC function [17], previous studies have not yet determined a mechanistic basis for the cellular phenotypes observed. Thus, additional studies examining the function of HCFC1 in NPCs are warranted.
We have created a zebrafish harboring a mutation in the hcfc1a gene (hcfc1aco60/+ allele) using CRISPR/Cas9. Zebrafish have two orthologs of HCFC1 and in previous studies, we demonstrated that hcfc1b is associated with increased NPC production [16]. The two zebrafish paralogs have been shown to have divergent functions, as the knockdown of hcfc1b causes facial dysmorphia, but knockdown of hcfc1a does not [20]. Therefore, we asked whether germline mutations in the hcfc1a gene cause defects in neural development. Our results demonstrate that the hcfc1aco60/+ allele results in increased numbers of proliferating NPCs (Sox2+) and hypomotility. Subsequent RNA sequencing on whole brain homogenates obtained from the hcfc1aco60/+ allele identified increased expression of asxl1, which encodes a transcription factor known to modulate the cell cycle [23, 24]. Furthermore, inhibition of asxl1 expression in larvae carrying the hcfc1aco60/+ allele restored the number of NPCs to normal levels. Collectively, our study demonstrates a molecular mechanism by which hcfc1a regulates NPC proliferation and brain development.
Methods
Experimental model and subject details
The experimental model used in this study is the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Zebrafish were obtained from the University of Colorado, School of Medicine or the Zebrafish International Resource Center (ZIRC). The hcfc1aco60/+ allele was produced using CRISPR/Cas9 methodology as described [25]. The hcfc1aco60/+ allele was produced at the University of Colorado, School of Medicine by the corresponding author and obtained according to protocols from the University of Texas El Paso. Briefly, a guide RNA (GGTTCATACCAGCCGTTCGT) was designed using publicly available software (ZiFit) [26]. Oligonucleotides from the forward and reverse strand were annealed and ligated into the DR274 vector as described [26]. Guide template DNA was synthesized using PCR amplification with primers (DR274 FWD: TTTGAGACGGGCGACAGAT and DR274 Rev: TTCTGCTATGGAGGTCAGGT) and RNA was synthesized using the MEGAscript T7 in vitro transcription kit. Cas9 was synthesized using the T7 mMessage machine after linearization with PmeI (New England Biolabs) of the Cas9 vector (pMLM3613). A solution (0.2 M KCl with phenol red indicator) containing a final concentration of 500 ng Cas9 and 70 ng of guide RNA was injected at a volume of 2 nl at the single cell stage and embryos were grown to adulthood. The hcfc1aco60/+ allele was generated from a single founder (F0), which was outcrossed with 3 independent wildtype (AB) fish to generate 3 families of F1 carriers. Each family consisted of approximately 20 total fish with equal numbers of males and females. To generate subsequent generations, we outcrossed a minimum of 3 F1 individuals with wildtype (Tupfel Long Fin) to obtain a minimum of 3 families of F2 carriers. We subsequently outcrossed F2 carriers (minimum of 3) with wildtype (AB) fish to produce an F3 generation of approximately 3 total families with equal numbers of males and females. Sanger sequencing confirmed mutation and experiments were initiated in the F3 generation.
The Tg(hsp701:HCFC1) was created using Gateway cloning technology. Briefly, the p5e-hsp701, pME-HCFC1 (created from pcDNA6.1 reported in [20]), p3E-polyA, and the pDestTol2PA were recombined via LR recombination. The resultant vector was co-injected with transposase mRNA synthesized from the pCS2FA vector as previously described [27]. The experiments described herein were performed in the F2 generation, which was produced from a single founder (F0). The positive F0 carrier was outcrossed with wildtype (AB) to produce 2 families of F1 individuals and a minimum of 3 carriers of the F1 generation were outcrossed to produce 3 families of F2 carriers that were utilized for the experiments described.
For all experiments, embryos (prior to sexual dimorphism) were obtained by crossing AB wildtype, Tupfel Long Fin wildtype, Tg(hsp701:HCFC1), or hcfc1aco60/+. Experiments were performed at developmental stages only [0–5 days post fertilization (DPF)]. All embryos were maintained in embryo medium at 28 °C. All adults beyond the age of peak breeding age (> 1.5 years) were euthanized using a 10 g/l buffered solution of pharmaceutical grade MS 222 (Tricaine). Fish were emerged in solution for 30 min at room temperature. All euthanized adults underwent secondary euthanasia using a cold ice bath (2–4 °C). Fish were monitored for operculum movement during euthanasia and cessation of movement was indicative of euthanasia. Embryos (< 7 days old) were euthanized using 1–10% sodium hypochlorite solution after being anesthetized in cold ice bath. Prior to fin clipping and before fixation, all fish, adults and larvae, respectively, were anesthetized using MS 222 (150 mg/l for adults and 300 mg/l for embryos). The degree of anesthesia was monitored by operculum movement of adults and cessation of movement for larvae. These techniques are approved and advised by the American Veterinary Medical Association and approved by the University of Texas El Paso Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Genotyping
Genotyping of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele was performed by lysing excised larval tissue or fin clips (adults) in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris pH 8.2, 10 mM EDTA, 200 mM NaCl, 0.5% SDS, and 200 μg/ml proteinase K) for 3 h at 55 °C. DNA was isolated according to standard phenol chloroform: ethanol precipitation procedures. Primers pairs were developed that specifically bind to and amplify the mutated allele, which did not amplify the wildtype allele. The fragment of interest was amplified by standard PCR at an annealing temperature of 64° (FWD: CCAGTTCGCCTTTTTGTTGT and REV: ACGGGTGGTATGAACCACTGGC). Positive amplification indicates positive carriers of the allele (Fig. 1). Genotyping of the Tg(hsp701:HCFC1) allele was performed with the following primers: forward primer (TGAAACAATTGCACCATAAATTG) present in the hsp701 promoter and reverse primer in the HCFC1 open reading frame (CGTCACACACGAAGCCATAG). Amplification indicates the genotype of interest.
Immunohistochemistry
Embryos/larvae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for minimum of 1 h at room temperature (RT). For each time point, a small piece of caudal tissue was excised for genotyping and the remaining rostral tissue was embedded in 1.5% agarose (Fisher) produced in 5% sucrose (Fisher) and embryo medium. Embedded blocks were incubated overnight in 30% sucrose (Fisher) and then snap frozen with dry ice and cryosectioned (12–20 μM). Sections were washed twice in 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 at RT for 30 min each and blocked for 1 h in blocking buffer (2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (Fisher), 2% goat serum (Fisher) diluted in 1× PBS). Primary antibody [1:200 anti-Sox2 (Abcam) or 1:500 anti-HuC/D (Fisher)] was incubated overnight at 4 °C and then washed twice in 1× PBS for 30 min each at RT. Alexa fluor antibodies (Fisher) were diluted 1:200 and incubated on each slide for 1 h at RT. All slides were cover slipped using Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) and imaged on a Zeiss LSM 700 at 20×–63× magnification. For cell proliferation, larvae were pulsed in 20 mM 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) (Fisher) diluted in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Fisher) for 30 min at RT prior to fixation. EdU was detected using the EdU Click-It technology (Fisher) according to manufacturer protocol.
Cell quantification
For cell quantification, sections were first divided into forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain regions using two zebrafish brain atlases; (1) Atlas of Zebrafish Development [28] and (2) Atlas of Early Zebrafish Brain Development [29]. To specify brain regions, major hallmark sub-divisions of each brain section were separated based on age of larvae and the published sections and demarcations present in [29]. For example, sections of the developing brain are organized by letters: A–F indicate forebrain sections, G–L are midbrain, and M-R are hindbrain according to the zebrafish brain atlas. After standardization of the brain region by atlas, cells from each section (12–20 μM) were counted using the ImageJ cell counter. The ImageJ cell counter allows for the manual counting of cells by marking each cell with a colored square and adds the tallied cell to the quantification sheet. The cell counter allows for the tally of 4 independent groups separately with a different color square. Cells were easily visible across all replicates. Only biological replicates with high tissue integrity were quantified. For comparison of representative images, equivalent sections are shown to ensure that minor changes in tissue geometry do not affect the overall conclusion. These sections are standardized from the zebrafish brain atlas. For bar graphs, the average number of cells across each brain region were utilized for quantification using approximately 10–20 equivalent sections/brain region/fish. The number of animals per group is described in each figure legend. To determine the relative increase/decrease in total cell number, the number of total cells/section was divided by the average number of cells present in wildtype siblings for each brain region analyzed and multiplied by 100. All statistical analysis was performed using total numbers of cells/section/brain region. All immunohistochemistry was validated with quantitative real time PCR (QPCR) of each gene analyzed.
QPCR and in situ hybridization
Whole mount in situ hybridization (ISH) was performed as described by Thisse and Thisse [30]. Briefly, embryos were harvested and dechorionated at the indicated time point and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 1 h at RT. Embryos were permeabilized with proteinase K (10 μg/ml) for the time indicated [30]. Permeabilized embryos were prehybridized in hybridization buffer (HB) [50% deionized formamide (Fisher), 5× SSC (Fisher), 0.1% Tween 20 (Fisher), 50 μg/ml heparin (Sigma, St. Louis), 500 μg/ml of RNase-free tRNA (Sigma), 1 M citric acid (Fisher) (460 μl for 50 ml of HB)] for 2–4 h and then incubated overnight in fresh HB with probe (50–100 ng) at 70 °C. Samples were washed, blocked in 2% sheep serum, and incubated with anti-DIG Fab fragments (1:10,000) (Sigma) overnight at 4 °C. Samples were developed with BM purple AP substrate (Sigma) and images were collected with a Zeiss Discovery Stereo Microscope fitted with Zen Software. The asxl1 cDNA probe sequence was amplified using the following primers: FWD: CATCAACACACGGACCTTTG and REV: CAGTGAGTGGGGTGGAAGTT, purified using a DNA purification kit (Fisher), then ligated into the pGEM-T easy vector using the pGEM T-easy Plasmid Ligation Kit (Promega).
For QPCR, RNA was isolated from embryos at the indicated time point using Trizol (Fisher) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription was performed using Verso cDNA synthesis (Fisher) and total RNA was normalized across all samples. PCR was performed in technical triplicates for each sample using an Applied Biosystem’s StepOne Plus machine with Applied Biosystem’s software. Sybr green (Fisher) based primer pairs for each gene analyzed are as follows: mmachc fwd: GCTTCGAGGTTTACCCCTTC, mmachc rev: AGGCCAGGGTAGGGTCCTG, hcfc1a fwd: ACAGGGCCTAACACAGGTTG, hcfc1a rev: TCCTGTGACTGTGCCAAGAG, asxl1 fwd: CCAGAGCTGGAAAGAACGTC, asxl1 rev: ACATCTCCAGCTTCGCTCAT, rpl13a fwd: TCCCAGCTGCTCTCAAGATT, rpl13a rev: TTCTTGGAATAGCGCAGCTT, sox2 fwd: AACTCCTCGGGAAACAACCA, sox2 rev: ATCCGGGTGTTCCTTCATGT, elavl3 fwd: TAACGGCCCTGTCATTAGCA, elavl3 rev: CGTGTTGATAGCCTTGTCGG, gfap fwd: GGCCAACTCTAACATGCAGG, gfap rev: ATTCCAGGTCACAGGTCAGG, olig2 fwd: TTCTGTAGGCCACACACCAG, and olig2 rev: TTAACTCCGGTGGAGAATCG. Analysis was performed using 2ΔΔct.
For RNA sequencing analysis, total RNA was isolated from brain homogenates (N = 12/group from 3 biological replicates), analyzed for RNA integrity, and sequenced at The University of Texas El Paso Border Biomedical Research Center Genomics Core Facility. RNA sequencing was performed in biological triplicate. RNA integrity was assessed with a TapeStation 2200 and the library was prepared with a TruSeq stranded mRNA library preparation kit. Sequencing was performed on a NextSeq 500 (Illumina) using a high output kit V2 (150 cycles). For analysis, the sequences were quality trimmed using Trimmomatic [31] and aligned to the Danio rerio genome (build GRCz11) obtained from Ensembl v95 using Tophat2 [32]. Cufflinks [33] was used to determine the differential expression patterns between mutant and wildtype samples.
Tg(hsp701:HCFC1) analysis and rescue experiments
F2 carriers of the Tg(hsp701:HCFC1) were incrossed and grown at 28° for 24 h and then split into two groups, non-heat shock and heat shock. Heat shock was performed for 30 min at 38° and then allowed to acclimate at RT for 20 min. Heat shock was initiated at 24 h post fertilization (HPF) and performed every 8 h until 2 or 5 DPF. For LY294002 (Selleck Chemicals) rescue, the drug was dissolved in 100% DMSO (Fisher) and embryos were treated at 24 HPF with a 12uM concentration for a period of 24 h. Media was removed and embryos were dechorionated (if necessary) and fixed for immunohistochemistry.
For morpholino rescue, 2 nl of a 0.1 mM solution of asxl1 targeting translation inhibiting morpholinos (GTTTGTCCTTCATTTCCTCAGTGTT) or random control morpholinos (Gene-Tools) were injected into offspring of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele. Injected embryos were fixed at 2 DPF and simultaneously stained for the number of Sox2+ and/or EdU+ positive cells. Cells were counted as described above.
Larval behavioral assay
Embryos were obtained from an outcross of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele and raised to 5 DPF. Behavioral quantification was performed using the Zebrabox (ViewPoint Behavior Technology) as previously described [34]. Larvae were individually tracked for swim speed and total distance swam in a 96 well plate. The behavioral protocol was a total of 15 min divided into 5-min intervals of dark/light/dark conditions. All larvae were acclimated to the dish and housing conditions for 1 h prior to analysis. Settings for the program include a threshold of 16 and integration period of 300 s. Data was measured as total distance traveled (mm) and total swim speed (mm/s) (Swim Speed = {Total distance traveled in large and small movements) (Smldist + Lardist)}/{Total duration spent by the animal in small and large movements (smldur + lardur)}. Statistical significance was determined according to a T-test. All experiments were performed in biological triplicate.
Quantification and statistical analysis
For all assays, statistical significance was calculated using a T-test to compare the means of two groups. All assays were performed in biological duplicate and triplicate and all QPCR was performed in technical and biological triplicate or duplicate, respectively. For each assay, the total number of animals (N) is indicated in the figure legend. Number of animals was determined based on power analysis conducted from preliminary studies. For all graphs, statistical significance between groups and the p-value is shown in the figure legend. For cell quantification, the number of Sox2+ or EdU+ cells were counted per section and normalized according to the methods section above. All sections were sub-divided based on landmarks in the Atlas of Early Zebrafish Brain Development, 2nd Edition and then separated into specific brain regions (forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain). All graphs represent error bars as standard error of the mean (SEM).
Results
Production of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele
Previous studies suggest that HCFC1 regulates the number of NPCs in vitro and in mouse models [14–17]. HCFC1 is highly conserved across species [19] and zebrafish have been used as a model system to understand the mechanisms by which mutations in HCFC1 cause disease [16, 20]. Therefore, we developed a zebrafish harboring a germline mutation in the hcfc1a gene using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. We developed a specific guide RNA (sgRNA) that targets exon 3 of the hcfc1a gene (Fig. 1a). The sgRNA was injected at the single cell stage and resulted in the net insertion of 13 nucleotides (Fig. 1a). The introduction of these nucleotides is predicted to introduce a premature stop codon and encode a peptide of 94 amino acids in length (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Full length Hcfc1a is approximately 1778 amino acids in length. Genotyping of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele was developed according to the materials and methods section, using a reverse primer unique to the mutant allele in the amplification strategy (Fig. 1a). Positive amplification was indicative of positive carriers (Fig. 1b), as the primers did not bind to or amplify the wildtype allele. Initial crosses between heterozygous carriers of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele failed to generate homozygous progeny and did not obey Mendelian inheritance patterns. These results indicate that Hcfc1a is required for early development, which is consistent with previously published studies [21, 22], however the mechanism for embryonic lethality of the homozygous allele was not explored further here. Importantly, heterozygous carriers survived to adulthood with a lifespan equivalent to wildtype adult zebrafish. Adult heterozygous carriers did not show any gross morphological phenotypes associated with the allele. Larval heterozygous carriers did not show overt morphological phenotypes during early development, which is consistent with previous studies using anti-sense morpholinos targeting the hcfc1a gene [20]. However, based on previous studies [14, 15] we surmised that heterozygous carriers of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele would have defects in overall hcfc1a expression and potential defects in brain development. Therefore, we measured the expression of hcfc1a in carriers of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele and their wildtype siblings using QPCR. We designed primers to detect hcfc1a expression downstream of Exon 3 that span exons 15 and 17 to ensure that the primers were capable of detecting changes in total mRNA expression and not truncated N-terminal transcripts. As shown in Fig. 1c, at 2 DPF carriers of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele had a 50% decrease in total hcfc1a mRNA (p < 0.05).
Hcfc1a regulates NPC number in vivo
Several studies suggest that mutation or abnormal expression of Hcfc1 (mouse) mRNA disrupts the number of NPCs, their proliferation, and/or their differentiation. Moreover, we have previously published that hcfc1a is expressed in the developing brain across the forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain [20]. Therefore, we asked whether the decrease in hcfc1a mRNA expression in carriers of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele resulted in abnormal numbers of NPCs in vivo. To test this, we first measured the expression of sox2 and pax6 using QPCR at 5 DPF. We used sox2 and pax6 as a readout for NPCs because they are co-localized and established markers of NPCs in the field [35–37]. At 5 DPF, the expression of both sox2 and pax6 were up-regulated in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae relative to their wildtype siblings (Fig. 2a). We next compared the total number of Sox2+ cells in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae and their wildtype siblings over the course of development at 1 (Fig. 2b), 2, and 5 DPF. Increased NPCs were not observed until 2 DPF (Fig. 2c), but this increase was sustained until 5 DPF (Fig. 2d). hcfc1aco60/+ larvae had increased numbers of NPCs in the forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain regions, with NPCs highly enriched in the ventricular region of the developing brain (Fig. 3a–d and a′–d′, arrowheads indicate cells). There was approximately 25–30% more Sox2+ cells per brain region based upon our quantification (Figs. 2, 3).
The hcfc1aco60/+ allele disrupts cell proliferation
Mutation of Hcfc1 in mice is associated with increased cell death in a subpopulation of NPCs [17], therefore, we hypothesized that the excess NPCs produced undergo cell death. To measure cell death, we performed immunohistochemistry with anti-active caspase 3 antibodies and anti-Sox2 antibodies at 5 DPF. As shown in Fig. 4a, a′, we detected approximately 1–2 Caspase+ Sox2+ cells in sibling controls (white arrowhead), however larvae harboring the hcfc1aco60/+ allele had on average approximately 4–5 co-localized cells per/section (white arrowheads in Fig. 4a′). As we detected very few total Caspase+ NPCs, we next quantified the total number of NPCs in each group to determine the total number of NPCs surviving. As shown in Fig. 4b, while the hcfc1aco60/+ allele led to an increase in the number of caspase positive NPCs (red bars), the vast majority of NPCs in both wildtype and hcfc1aco60/+ larvae were not caspase positive (gray bars), indicating that a significant fraction of NPCs survive. Because of this survival, we next analyzed cell proliferation in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae and their wildtype siblings using EdU click-it technology. The hcfc1aco60/+ allele resulted in a statistically significant increase in the number of EdU positive cells in both the midbrain and hindbrain regions (Fig. 4c–d, c′–d′ and quantified in Fig. 4e). We observed an increase in the number of EdU positive cells in the forebrain, although the increase in the forebrain was not significant across multiple biological replicates (p = 0.06). Collectively, these data suggest the hcfc1aco60/+ allele results in an increase in NPC proliferation, whereby a sub-population of these NPCs undergo cell death, while the majority of those NPCs produced, survive.
The hcfc1aco60/+ allele is associated with abnormal expression of pro-neural and pro-glial genes
The hcfc1aco60/+ allele is associated with increased proliferation and an increased number of NPCs. Importantly, the majority of these cells do not undergo cell death and therefore, we asked if the expression of genes associated with either neuronal or glial differentiation was abnormal. We measured the expression of two established markers of neurons and radial glial cells, elavl3 and gfap, by immunohistochemistry. As shown in the Fig. 5a′, b′, the expression of both Gfap and Elavl3 expression was increased in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae at 5 DPF. Next, we quantified the level of expression of each marker and one additional marker of differentiation (olig2) using QPCR at 5DPF. QPCR demonstrated an increase in the level of mRNA expression of each marker (Fig. 5c) in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae relative to their wildtype siblings (p < 0.05).
Overexpression of HCFC1 reduces the number of NPCs and decreases neural and glial gene expression
Our data demonstrates that haploinsufficiency of hcfc1a is associated with increased proliferation and increased numbers of Sox2+ cells. Previous studies have shown that over-expression of Hcfc1 (mouse) in vitro is associated with reduced NPC proliferation/growth and reduced NPC proliferation [15]. We tested the effects of HCFC1 over expression in zebrafish by creating a transgenic zebrafish expressing human HCFC1 under the control of the heat shock promoter, hsp701. The efficacy of the hsp701 promoter in zebrafish has been widely established in previous studies [27, 38–42]. We activated expression of HCFC1 by performing a heat shock as described in the methods section for a period of 5 days. We first measured the mRNA expression of sox2, elavl3 (HuC/D), gfap, and olig2 by QPCR. Activation by heat shock of the Tg(hsp701:HCFC1) allele resulted in decreased expression of all markers analyzed (Fig. 6a; p < 0.05). We next analyzed the number of Sox2+ cells in the presence and absence of heat shock. Activation of the Tg(hsp701:HCFC1) was associated with a decreased number of NPCs across the forebrain (p = 4.88568E−05), midbrain (p = 0.004359), and hindbrain (p = 0.0776) (Fig. 6b, c–c′).
Asxl1 is overexpressed in animals with the hcfc1aco60/+ allele
HCFC1 is known to regulate metabolism and craniofacial development via the modulation of MMACHC expression [14, 19, 20]. Therefore, we hypothesized the neural phenotypes associated with mutations in hcfc1a were the direct consequence of defects in mmachc expression. We measured the expression of mmachc in hcfc1a mutants and their wildtype siblings. As shown in Fig. 7a, QPCR analysis demonstrated that mmachc expression was unchanged by the hcfc1aco60/+ allele. Based upon these data, we hypothesized that mutation of hcfc1a does not regulate brain development by modulating mmachc expression. To better understand the mechanisms downstream of hcfc1a, we performed RNA-sequencing at 2 DPF using whole brain homogenates from wildtype and hcfc1aco60/+ larvae (Additional file 2: Table S1). Using literature analysis, we identified the asxl1 gene as one possible downstream effector of Hcfc1a in the developing brain. asxl1 encodes a transcriptional regulator that is essential for proper cell proliferation and whose deletion causes cellular senescence [24, 43]. More importantly, mutations in ASXL1 have been associated with Boring Opitz Syndrome (605039), which has been characterized by profound intellectual disability [44]. According to in situ hybridization, asxl1 expression is restricted to the developing zebrafish brain as indicated by the purple stain in panel b′ (Fig. 7b, b′). The sense negative control was absent of this purple stain as shown in Fig. 7b. Additional, QPCR analysis of brain homogenates validated a 14-fold increase of asxl1 expression at 2 DPF in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae relative to wildtype siblings (Fig. 7c).
Inhibition of asxl1 restores the NPC phenotype in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae
Deletion of Asxl1 in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) causes growth retardation because Asxl1 regulates the cell cycle via activation of the AKT-E2F axis [24]. Based upon these data, we hypothesized that over-expression of asxl1 in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae promotes proliferation of NPCs. To test this hypothesis, we designed a translational blocking morpholino to inhibit asxl1 expression in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae. We determined the concentration for injection empirically and selected the highest concentration that promoted > 70% survival of injected embryos. We injected asxl1 morpholinos or random control morpholinos into hcfc1aco60/+ larvae and their wildtype siblings at the single cell stage and then analyzed the number of EdU positive cells at 2 DPF. As shown in Fig. 7d, the injection of random control morpholinos into hcfc1a mutants and their wildtype siblings had no detrimental effects and recapitulated the NPC phenotype previously observed (i.e. increased NPCs, Figs. 2 and 3). However, the injection of asxl1 morpholinos completely restored the number of NPCs to wildtype levels in all brain regions (Fig. 7d, red bars).
Morpholinos can display off-target effects [45] and therefore we sought an alternative route of asxl1 inhibition in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae. Youn and colleagues have demonstrated that ASXL1 (mouse) expression promotes cell proliferation by binding to AKT kinase and promoting AKT phosphorylation [24]. However, this function can be inhibited with PI3K/AKT inhibitors. Therefore, we treated hcfc1aco60/+ larvae and their wildtype siblings with LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor as described in [24]. hcfc1aco60/+ embryos were treated at 24HPF with 12 μM LY294002 or vehicle control (DMSO). Vehicle treatment of wildtype and hcfc1aco60/+ larvae recapitulated the NPC phenotype (i.e. increased NPCs) present in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae (Fig. 8a–a″, b–b″ and c–c″, white arrowheads), which was consistent across all brain regions as both the number of Sox2+ cells (Fig. 9a) and the number of EdU+ cells (Fig. 9b) were increased in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae. In contrast, treatment with LY294002 reduced the number of cycling cells (EdU+) and the number of NPCs (Sox2+) in hcfc1aco60/+ larvae, consistent with our hypothesis (Fig. 9a, b, red bars). To complement these data, we next performed mRNA expression analysis of sox2, asxl1, and cyclin E (ccne1) in treated and untreated hcfc1aco60/+ larvae at 5 DPF. As shown in Fig. 9c, treatment with LY294002 resulted in decreased expression of sox2 and asxl1, which was correlated with decreased ccne1 expression (p < 0.05).
Defects in neural development are associated with larval hypomotility
The functional consequences of the defects in brain development in the hcfc1aco60/+ allele are not completely understood. However, mutation of HCFC1 in patients with cblX syndrome is associated with movement disorders [19]. Therefore, we performed larval behavioral assays to determine if defects in the number of NPCs were associated with abnormal swim patterns. To test this, we monitored swim behavior of 5 DPF larvae using Zebrabox technology. Carriers of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele exhibited reduced overall distance swam in response to light stimulus as described in [34], but overall speed was not affected (Fig. 10a, b). These behavioral deficits are consistent with a hypomotility phenotype [46]. Importantly, hcfc1aco60/+ responded normally to dark–light–dark transitions (Fig. 10c) as has been previously demonstrated [47].
Discussion
Here we demonstrate that the hcfc1aco60/+ allele results in an increase in the number of NPCs during early brain development. This increase in NPC number is a direct consequence of over proliferation of NPCs. Mutations in HCFC1 cause cblX syndrome, a multiple congenital anomaly syndrome, associated with cobalamin deficiencies and significant neurological deficits, among other phenotypes [15, 19]. HCFC1 encodes for a transcriptional co-activator that regulates genes important for metabolism and proliferation [12]. It is suggested that HCFC1 binds to and regulates the expression of > 5000 different genes [18], with various different interacting partners including THAP11 [13] and ZNF143 [48], where mutation of either can cause a cblX like disorder [16, 49].
Previous reports suggest that HCFC1 regulates NPC function [14–17]. In vitro, decreased Hcfc1 (mouse) expression increases the number of NPCs and reduces the expression of markers associated with differentiation [14]. These data are consistent with the known function of Hcfc1 in cell proliferation [50–52]. Mutation of Hcfc1 (mouse) is embryonically lethal [21] and consequently, the in vivo function of HCFC1 has been difficult to characterize. Our results are consistent with this observation, as we did not detect viable homozygous larvae or adults. We genotyped larvae from an incross of hcfc1aco60/+ adults at 2, 4, and 8 HPF and even at the earliest time points, we detected few to zero homozygous larvae. We did not explore this mechanism further, however in previous studies the murine Hcfc1 mutant allele was subject to compensatory mechanisms and only the paternally inherited allele was viable [21]. Zebrafish do not have sex chromosomes, but future studies are warranted that characterize the inheritance of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele as well as the embryonic lethality.
Recently a cell-type specific mutant allele was created in which Hcfc1 (mouse) was deleted from a subpopulation of neural precursors (NKX2.1+). This cell type specific deletion of Hcfc1 (mouse) induces cell death and defects in differentiation without affecting proliferation. These results differ from in vitro assays, whereby decreased Hcfc1 (mouse) results in an increase in the number of precursors. The discrepancy between these results might be explained by many factors, including the propagation of neurospheres in vitro and the inability to decipher how the developing microenvironment affects normal physiology. However, some studies have helped to shed light on the latter explanation because the in vivo knockdown of hcfc1b, one of the zebrafish orthologs of HCFC1, resulted in increased NPC proliferation [16]. Thus, the function of HCFC1 is complex, with several unknown cell-type specific functions that can be affected by the surrounding microenvironment.
Here we developed a zebrafish harboring a germline mutation in the hcfc1a gene. We analyzed the effects of this mutation on NPC number and proliferation. Consistent with the literature [14–16], our allele resulted in an increase in the number of Sox2+ cells and increased cellular proliferation without significant deficits in cell survival. Increased cell proliferation was observed across all brain regions. However, our studies were limited to detection of NPCs using the Sox2 marker. A significant fraction of these cells co-localize with EdU positive cells in the Co60/+ allele, but not all of them. These data strongly suggest that hcfc1a is important for the proliferation of Sox2 positive NPCs. However, the NPC population is heterogeneous in nature and can include Sox2+ and Sox2− cells. We do not yet understand the effects of hcfc1a mutations on the Sox2− population or other NPC sub-populations (actively proliferating versus not proliferating). However, we did observe increased pax6 expression. Sox2 and Pax6 are known to be co-expressed in a subpopulation of NPCs so it is possible these two markers label similar populations of NPCs [37].
The increased numbers of NPCs in the Co60 allele was not associated with increased apoptosis of NPCs, but instead was associated with increased expression of markers associated with neurons and glia. The effects of this increased expression are yet to be elucidated, however studies that provide information on brain volume and the ratio of gray and white matter in the central nervous system are warranted; particularly given that the increases in neurons and glia we observed are unique from the differentiation defects observed in previous studies [14, 17]. However, we suspect the difference in phenotype between previous studies and our own is likely associated with the type of mutation introduced, the brain microenvironment, the cell population analyzed, and the region of the brain of interest. For example, Minocha and Herr [17] deleted exons 2 and 3 of Hcfc1 using a Cre-Lox system with a cell type specific promoter. The resulting approach introduces the formation of a truncated protein, whereas, our system results in decreased overall expression (Fig. 1), which may be more consistent with previous in vitro assays and haploinsufficiency. However our haploinsufficient allele advances the field because unlike the previous in vitro assays [14, 15], our allele accounts for the broad expression of Hcfc1 which was recently documented by Minocha and colleagues [17].
HCFC1 regulates a myriad of downstream target genes [12, 18] and therefore, the mechanisms by which HCFC1 regulates NPC function are not clear. The majority of the literature focuses primarily on the function of HCFC1 at the MMACHC promoter in the human syndrome, cblX. cblX disorder is the result of mutations in the HCFC1 gene and these mutations disrupt protein function causing a decrease the expression of MMACHC and a metabolic disorder [14, 19]. Interestingly, mutations in MMACHC cause cblC disorder, which has many overlapping phenotypes with cblX including neurodevelopmental defects [53]. These data led us to hypothesize that HCFC1 regulates NPC function by modulating MMACHC expression. However, the hcfc1aco60/+ allele did not disrupt mmachc expression. However, whether our allele causes other metabolic deficits is not known and was not explored further here. For example, mutation of the human HCFC1 gene has been associated with non-ketotic hyperglycinemia [54]. Collectively the data presented here suggests that the hcfc1aco60/+ allele disrupts NPC proliferation by a novel molecular mechanism. In addition, these data suggest some divergent function between hcfc1a and hcfc1b, as the latter has been shown to regulate mmachc expression and craniofacial development [20].
Our results strongly suggest an mmachc independent mechanism underlying the neural developmental phenotypes associated with the hcfc1aco60/+ allele, but we cannot completely rule out that hcfc1b regulates brain development via mmachc expression or that other factors including cobalamin, homocysteine, or methylmalonic acid accumulation. However, RNA-sequencing of brain homogenates provided us a list of potential downstream effectors of hcfc1a. Of those candidates, the asxl1 gene was afforded high priority because of its known role regulating cellular proliferation [24, 43, 55] and for its documented function in mouse embryonic stem cells and neural differentiation [23]. Interestingly, the hcfc1aco60/+ allele causes a 14-fold induction of asxl1 expression. In mouse embryonic fibroblasts, the deletion of Asxl1 causes cellular senescence. We observed increased cellular proliferation and therefore, postulated that an increased level of Asxl1 protein was promoting NPC proliferation in hcfc1a mutant larvae. Consistent with the known function of asxl1 and our hypothesis, knockdown of asxl1 in hcfc1a mutant larvae restored the defects in cellular proliferation, resulting in normal numbers of Sox2+ cells.
Interestingly, ASXL1 has been shown to regulate cell proliferation in other cell types [55, 56] and this activity has been associated with activation of AKT. Based upon these data, we attempted to restore the phenotypes present in the hcfc1aco60/+ allele by inhibiting ASXL1 activity downstream of PI3K [24]. Consistent with this role, the inhibition of ASXL1 activity using pharmacological inhibition completely restored the NPC deficits present in hcfc1a mutants. Thus, our data suggest a mechanism whereby hcfc1a regulates the expression of Asxl1 and the cell cycle during early brain development. However, whether hcfc1a regulates asxl1 by directly binding to the asxl1 promoter is still not known, but interestingly ASXL1 and HCFC1 interact with one another in myeloid cells to regulate proliferation and differentiation [57]. Thus, these two proteins may regulate the activity of one another at multiple levels.
We observed changes in the expression of various markers of neurons and glia. However, the physiological consequences of these changes are not currently known. Zebrafish have emerged as a model for neurodevelopmental disorders [58] and behavioral assays for seizure [59] and motor deficits [60] have been described. Therefore, we characterized the locomotion of hcfc1a mutants in response to light stimulus [61]. Our results, using Zebrabox technology, demonstrated reduced motility as indicated by decreased distance travelled. Importantly, the decreased motility during a light stimulus was not due to an overall defective response to light, as our analysis demonstrated that carriers of the hcfc1aco60/+ allele responded to normally to light stimulus, as indicated by the “V” like pattern in dark–light–dark conditions [62]. Decreased distance travelled has been previously defined as hypolocomotion and is associated with motor incoordination [63]. Hypolocomotion has been demonstrated in zebrafish models of ALS [60, 64] and fetal akinesia [65], two disorders characterized by motor deficits. Interestingly, the hypolocomotion we observed was correlated with increased NPCs and defects in the expression of various markers associated with differentiation. We did not observe short convulsions or whirlpool like behaviors in mutant larvae, which would have been indicative of a seizure phenotype and it is likely that the protocol we used to detect behavioral deficits does not stimulate a seizure like phenotype. Future studies that use multiple stimuli, including low dose convulsants will likely shed light on the epileptic phenotypes associated with mutations in hcfc1a.
Conclusions
Our study focuses on the function of hcfc1a, one ortholog of HCFC1, during brain development. Specifically, we focus on the function of hcfc1a in modulating NPC number and proliferation. We demonstrate that HCFC1 is essential for the proliferation of NPCs. Importantly we connect these cellular deficits to a molecular mechanism whereby hcfc1a indirectly or directly regulates asxl1 expression to control cellular proliferation. Thus, we propose that our system has the potential to inform about the transcriptional program regulating NPC function.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Authors thank and acknowledge the help and support of Elizabeth Geiger, Valerie Caro, Jose Hernandez, Tamim Shaikh, and Bruce Appel.
Abbreviations
- NPC
Neural precursor
- cblX
Methylmalonic acidemia and homocysteinemia, cblX type
- F0
Founder
- DPF
Days post fertilization
- HPF
Hours post fertilization
- RT
Room temperature
- DMSO
Dimethylsulfoxide
- QPCR
Quantitative real time PCR
- ISH
Whole mount in situ hybridization
- SEM
Standard error of the mean
- EdU
5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine
- mM
Millimolar
- μM
Micromolar
- PFA
Paraformaldehyde
- SSC
Saline sodium citrate
- DIG
Digoxigenin
- AP
Alkaline phosphate
- CRISPR/Cas9
Clustered Regularly Interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 nuclease
- ng
Nanograms
- nl
Nanoliters
- EDTA
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
- NaCl
Sodium chloride
- SDS
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
- μg
Microgram
- PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
- HB
Hybridization buffer
- MEF
Mouse embryonic fibroblasts
Authors’ contributions
AMQ synthesized the hypothesis, wrote the manuscript, analyzed data, performed statistical analysis, genotyped, performed QPCR maintained zebrafish lines. VLC cryosectioned, imaged, counted cells, performed immunohistochemistry, performed injections, drug treatments, RNA analysis and QPCR, and aided in the study design. JFR performed cryosectioning, immunohistochemistry, genotyping, and cell counts. AMQ produced the germline mutant and transgenic heat shock animal. NGRN performed cell counts, imaging, and genotyping. DP performed genotyping. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
These studies were supported by Grants from the National Institutes of Health (National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities-2G12MD007592 to The University of Texas El Paso, National Institutes of General Medical Sciences RL5GM118969, TL4GM118971, R25GM069621-11, UL1GM118970 to The University of Texas El Paso, and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke 1K01NS099153-01A1 to Anita M. Quintana. This study was designed, performed, and analyzed by the authors. The funding sources provided financial support for the experiments described.
Availability of data and materials
The RNA-sequencing data sets generated during this study have been deposited into the GEO database with Accession number GSE132864 and a summary is included within the article. All files are also available from the corresponding author upon request. All files are accessible at the following link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE132864 and available as of May 6, 2020.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experiments were performed according to Protocol 811689-5 approved by The University of Texas El Paso Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Consent to publish
Not applicable
Competing interests
Authors report no competing financial interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Victoria L. Castro, Email: vlcastro2@utep.edu
Joel F. Reyes, Email: jfreyes4@miners.utep.edu
Nayeli G. Reyes-Nava, Email: ngreyesnava2@miners.utep.edu
David Paz, Email: dpaz3@utep.miners.edu.
Anita M. Quintana, Email: aquintana8@utep.edu
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12868-020-00577-1.
References
- 1.Trazzi S, Mitrugno VM, Valli E, Fuchs C, Rizzi S, Guidi S, et al. APP-dependent up-regulation of Ptch1 underlies proliferation impairment of neural precursors in Down syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(8):1560–1573. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang J, Weaver ICG, Gauthier-Fisher A, Wang H, He L, Yeomans J, et al. CBP histone acetyltransferase activity regulates embryonic neural differentiation in the normal and Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome brain. Dev Cell. 2010;18(1):114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dugani CB, Paquin A, Kaplan DR, Miller FD. Coffin-Lowry syndrome: a role for RSK2 in mammalian neurogenesis. Dev Biol. 2010;347(2):348–359. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Paronett EM, Meechan DW, Karpinski BA, LaMantia A-S, Maynard TM. Ranbp1, deleted in DiGeorge/22q11.2 deletion syndrome, is a microcephaly gene that selectively disrupts layer 2/3 cortical projection neuron generation. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25(10):3977–3993. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Roy A, Skibo J, Kalume F, Ni J, Rankin S, Lu Y, et al. Mouse models of human PIK3CA-related brain overgrowth have acutely treatable epilepsy. Elife. 2015;4:e12703. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sugathan A, Biagioli M, Golzio C, Erdin S, Blumenthal I, Manavalan P, et al. CHD8 regulates neurodevelopmental pathways associated with autism spectrum disorder in neural progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(42):E4468–E4477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405266111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Paquin A, Hordo C, Kaplan DR, Miller FD. Costello syndrome H-Ras alleles regulate cortical development. Dev Biol. 2009;330(2):440–451. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cimadamore F, Amador-Arjona A, Chen C, Huang C-T, Terskikh AV. SOX2-LIN28/let-7 pathway regulates proliferation and neurogenesis in neural precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(32):E3017–E3026. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220176110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pevny LH, Sockanathan S, Placzek M, Lovell-Badge R. A role for SOX1 in neural determination. Development. 1998;125(10):1967–1978. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.10.1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mignone JL, Kukekov V, Chiang A-S, Steindler D, Enikolopov G. Neural stem and progenitor cells in nestin-GFP transgenic mice. J Comp Neurol. 2004;469(3):311–324. doi: 10.1002/cne.10964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Curto GG, Gard C, Ribes V. Structures and properties of PAX linked regulatory networks architecting and pacing the emergence of neuronal diversity. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;44:75–86. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dejosez M, Levine SS, Frampton GM, Whyte WA, Stratton SA, Barton MC, et al. Ronin/Hcf-1 binds to a hyperconserved enhancer element and regulates genes involved in the growth of embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 2010;24(14):1479–1484. doi: 10.1101/gad.1935210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dejosez M, Krumenacker JS, Zitur LJ, Passeri M, Chu L-F, Songyang Z, et al. Ronin is essential for embryogenesis and the pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2008;133(7):1162–1174. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jolly LA, Nguyen LS, Domingo D, Sun Y, Barry S, Hancarova M, et al. HCFC1 loss-of-function mutations disrupt neuronal and neural progenitor cells of the developing brain. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(12):3335–3347. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang L, Jolly LA, Willis-Owen S, Gardner A, Kumar R, Douglas E, et al. A noncoding, regulatory mutation implicates HCFC1 in nonsyndromic intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91(4):694–702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Quintana AM, Yu H-C, Brebner A, Pupavac M, Geiger EA, Watson A, et al. Mutations in THAP11 cause an inborn error of cobalamin metabolism and developmental abnormalities. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(15):2838–2849. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Minocha S, Herr W. Cortical and commissural defects upon HCF-1 loss in Nkx2.1-derived embryonic neurons and glia. Dev Neurobiol. 2019 doi: 10.1002/dneu.22704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Michaud J, Praz V, Faresse NJ, Jnbaptiste CK, Tyagi S, Schütz F, et al. HCFC1 is a common component of active human CpG-island promoters and coincides with ZNF143, THAP11, YY1, and GABP transcription factor occupancy. Genome Res. 2013;23(6):907–916. doi: 10.1101/gr.150078.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yu H-C, Sloan JL, Scharer G, Brebner A, Quintana AM, Achilly NP, et al. An X-linked cobalamin disorder caused by mutations in transcriptional coregulator HCFC1. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93(3):506–514. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Quintana AM, Geiger EA, Achilly N, Rosenblatt DS, Maclean KN, Stabler SP, et al. Hcfc1b, a zebrafish ortholog of HCFC1, regulates craniofacial development by modulating mmachc expression. Dev Biol. 2014;396(1):94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Minocha S, Sung T-L, Villeneuve D, Lammers F, Herr W. Compensatory embryonic response to allele-specific inactivation of the murine X-linked gene Hcfc1. Dev Biol. 2016;412(1):1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Minocha S, Bessonnard S, Sung T-L, Moret C, Constam DB, Herr W. Epiblast-specific loss of HCF-1 leads to failure in anterior–posterior axis specification. Dev Biol. 2016;418(1):75–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.An S, Park U-H, Moon S, Kang M, Youn H, Hwang J-T, et al. Asxl1 ablation in mouse embryonic stem cells impairs neural differentiation without affecting self-renewal. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;508(3):907–913. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.12.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Youn HS, Kim T-Y, Park U-H, Moon S-T, An S-J, Lee Y-K, et al. Asxl1 deficiency in embryonic fibroblasts leads to cellular senescence via impairment of the AKT-E2F pathway and Ezh2 inactivation. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5198. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05564-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ablain J, Durand EM, Yang S, Zhou Y, Zon LI. A CRISPR/Cas9 vector system for tissue-specific gene disruption in zebrafish. Dev Cell. 2015;32(6):756–764. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hwang WY, Fu Y, Reyon D, Maeder ML, Tsai SQ, Sander JD, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR–Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(3):227–229. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kwan KM, Fujimoto E, Grabher C, Mangum BD, Hardy ME, Campbell DS, et al. The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev Dyn. 2007;236(11):3088–3099. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bryson-Richardson R, Berger S, Currie P. Atlas of zebrafish development. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mueller T, Wullimann M. Atlas of early zebrafish brain development. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Thisse C, Thisse B. High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(1):59–69. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14(4):R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–578. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Reyes-Nava N, Yu H-C, Coughlin CR, Shaikh TH, Quintana AM. Abnormal expression of GABAA receptor sub-units and hypomotility upon loss of gabra1 in zebrafish. Biol Open. 2020. https://bio.biologists.org/content/early/2020/03/20/bio.051367. Accessed 9 Apr 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Bergsland M, Ramsköld D, Zaouter C, Klum S, Sandberg R, Muhr J. Sequentially acting Sox transcription factors in neural lineage development. Genes Dev. 2011;25(23):2453–2464. doi: 10.1101/gad.176008.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ellis P, Fagan BM, Magness ST, Hutton S, Taranova O, Hayashi S, et al. SOX2, a persistent marker for multipotential neural stem cells derived from embryonic stem cells, the embryo or the adult. Dev Neurosci. 2004;26(2–4):148–165. doi: 10.1159/000082134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hutton SR, Pevny LH. SOX2 expression levels distinguish between neural progenitor populations of the developing dorsal telencephalon. Dev Biol. 2011;352(1):40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shen M-C, Ozacar AT, Osgood M, Boeras C, Pink J, Thomas J, et al. Heat-shock–mediated conditional regulation of hedgehog/gli signaling in zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2013;242(5):539–549. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.23955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pinto D, Delaby E, Merico D, Barbosa M, Merikangas A, Klei L, et al. Convergence of genes and cellular pathways dysregulated in autism spectrum disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94(5):677–694. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gou Y, Guo J, Maulding K, Riley BB. Sox2 and sox3 cooperate to regulate otic/epibranchial placode induction in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2018;435(1):84–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pan X, Sittaramane V, Gurung S, Chandrasekhar A. Structural and temporal requirements of Wnt/PCP protein Vangl2 function for convergence and extension movements and facial branchiomotor neuron migration in zebrafish. Mech Dev. 2014;131:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wong T-T, Collodi P. Inducible sterilization of zebrafish by disruption of primordial germ cell migration. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e68455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Uni M, Kurokawa M. Role of ASXL1 mutation in impaired hematopoiesis and cellular senescence. Oncotarget. 2018;9(96):36828–36829. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hoischen A, van Bon BWM, Rodríguez-Santiago B, Gilissen C, Vissers LELM, de Vries P, et al. De novo nonsense mutations in ASXL1 cause Bohring-Opitz syndrome. Nat Genet. 2011;43(8):729–731. doi: 10.1038/ng.868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Stainier DYR, Raz E, Lawson ND, Ekker SC, Burdine RD, Eisen JS, et al. Guidelines for morpholino use in zebrafish. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(10):e1007000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kalueff AV, Stewart AM, Gerlai R. Zebrafish as an emerging model for studying complex brain disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2014;35(2):63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Basnet RM, Zizioli D, Taweedet S, Finazzi D, Memo M. Zebrafish larvae as a behavioral model in neuropharmacology. Biomedicines. 2019;7:23. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines7010023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vinckevicius A, Parker JB, Chakravarti D. Genomic determinants of THAP11/ZNF143/HCFC1 complex recruitment to chromatin. Mol Cell Biol. 2015;35(24):4135–4146. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00477-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pupavac M, Watkins D, Petrella F, Fahiminiya S, Janer A, Cheung W, et al. Inborn error of cobalamin metabolism associated with the intracellular accumulation of transcobalamin-bound cobalamin and mutations in ZNF143, which codes for a transcriptional activator. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(9):976–982. doi: 10.1002/humu.23037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mangone M, Myers MP, Herr W. Role of the HCF-1 basic region in sustaining cell proliferation. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(2):e9020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Goto H, Motomura S, Wilson AC, Freiman RN, Nakabeppu Y, Fukushima K, et al. A single-point mutation in HCF causes temperature-sensitive cell-cycle arrest and disrupts VP16 function. Genes Dev. 1997;11(6):726–737. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.6.726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Julien E, Herr W. Proteolytic processing is necessary to separate and ensure proper cell growth and cytokinesis functions of HCF-1. EMBO J. 2003;22(10):2360–2369. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Carrillo-Carrasco N, Chandler RJ, Venditti CP. Combined methylmalonic acidemia and homocystinuria, cblC presentations, diagnosis and management. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35(1):91–102. doi: 10.1007/s10545-011-9364-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Scalais E, Osterheld E, Weitzel C, De Meirleir L, Mataigne F, Martens G, Shaikh TH, Coughlin CR, II, Yu HC, Swanson M, Friederich MW. X-linked cobalamin disorder (HCFC1) mimicking nonketotic hyperglycinemia with increased both cerebrospinal fluid glycine and methylmalonic acid. Pediatr Neurol. 2017;71:65–69. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang P, Chen Z, Li R, Guo Y, Shi H, Bai J, et al. Loss of ASXL1 in the bone marrow niche dysregulates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell fates. Cell Discov. 2018;4:4. doi: 10.1038/s41421-017-0004-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yang H, Kurtenbach S, Guo Y, Lohse I, Durante MA, Li J, et al. Gain of function of ASXL1 truncating protein in the pathogenesis of myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2018;131(3):328–341. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-789669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Inoue D, Fujino T, Sheridan P, Zhang Y-Z, Nagase R, Horikawa S, et al. A novel ASXL1-OGT axis plays roles in H3K4 methylation and tumor suppression in myeloid malignancies. Leukemia. 2018;32(6):1327–1337. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0083-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Reyes-Nava NG, Hernandez JA, Castro VL, Reyes JF, Castellanos BS, Quintana AM. Zebrafish: a comprehensive model to understand the mechanisms underlying neurodevelopmental disorders. In: Costa A, Villalba E, editors. Horizons in neuroscience research. Waltham: Nova Biomedical; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Afrikanova T, Serruys A-SK, Buenafe OEM, Clinckers R, Smolders I, de Witte PAM, et al. Validation of the zebrafish pentylenetetrazol seizure model: locomotor versus electrographic responses to antiepileptic drugs. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ciura S, Lattante S, Le Ber I, Latouche M, Tostivint H, Brice A, et al. Loss of function of C9orf72 causes motor deficits in a zebrafish model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2013;74(2):180–187. doi: 10.1002/ana.23946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liu Y, Carmer R, Zhang G, Venkatraman P, Brown SA, Pang C-P, et al. Statistical analysis of zebrafish locomotor response. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0139521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Li F, Lin J, Liu X, Li W, Ding Y, Zhang Y, et al. Characterization of the locomotor activities of zebrafish larvae under the influence of various neuroactive drugs. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(10):173. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.04.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kalueff AV, Gebhardt M, Stewart AM, Cachat JM, Brimmer M, Chawla JS, et al. Towards a comprehensive catalog of zebrafish behavior 1.0 and beyond. Zebrafish. 2013;10(1):70–86. doi: 10.1089/zeb.2012.0861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lattante S, de Calbiac H, Le Ber I, Brice A, Ciura S, Kabashi E. Sqstm1 knock-down causes a locomotor phenotype ameliorated by rapamycin in a zebrafish model of ALS/FTLD. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(6):1682–1690. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bonnin E, Cabochette P, Filosa A, Jühlen R, Komatsuzaki S, Hezwani M, et al. Biallelic mutations in nucleoporin NUP88 cause lethal fetal akinesia deformation sequence. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(12):e1007845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-sequencing data sets generated during this study have been deposited into the GEO database with Accession number GSE132864 and a summary is included within the article. All files are also available from the corresponding author upon request. All files are accessible at the following link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE132864 and available as of May 6, 2020.