Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
To the Editor:
Endotracheal suctioning is an important component of tracheobronchial hygiene therapy in mechanically ventilated patients.1 In the perioperative settings, the aspiration of pulmonary secretions from a patient with an artificial airway is carried out with a suction catheter using an open system.2 Suctioning an intubated patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an aerosol-generating procedure and is therefore at high risk of spreading infection.2,3 Although the clinicians performing the suctioning of tracheal secretions are equipped with level III protection; a closed-suction system is desirable and likely adds extra protection.2 However, a closed system for tracheal suction is often not provided in an operating room and its availability is extremely limited in the pandemic era.4 Therefore, we created a closed-suction system functionally comparable with that routinely used in the critical care unit (fig. 1A). Figure 1B illustrates its work principle. Readers are encouraged to watch the Supplemental Digital Content, video 1 (http://links.lww.com/ALN/C419) for a more comprehensive understanding of the closed suctioning system. We also tested it with smoke and found that the system works in the way expected (Supplemental Digital Content, video 2, http://links.lww.com/ALN/C418). The system can be used multiple times for a given patient and disposed of as a contaminated device at the end of use. We have used this suctioning system in 12 patients. It functioned well without any safety issues. This set up is not a U. S. Food and Drug Administration (European Union agent)–approved device, but it can be used as an alternative if a closed-suction system is unavailable for the care team dealing with COVID-19 patients.
Fig. 1.
(A) Devices used to build a closed-suction system for intubated patients. (B) Step-step explanation to build a closed-suction system with an ultrasound probe cover.
Research Support
Support was provided solely from institutional and/or departmental sources.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are available in both the HTML and PDF versions of this article. Links to the digital files are provided in the HTML text of this article on the Journal’s Web site (www.anesthesiology.org).
References
- 1.Jelic S, Cunningham JA, Factor Clinical review: Airway hygiene in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2008; 12:209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cook TM. Personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease (COVID) 2019 pandemic - A narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2020doi: 10.1111/anae.15071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vargas M, Servillo Improving staff safety during tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. Head Neck. 2020doi:10.1002/hed.26163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ranney ML, Griffeth V, Jha A. Critical supply shortages - The need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the Covid-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382:e41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.