Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
. 2020 Jun 11;105(8):e3052. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa294

CORRIGENDUM for “Central Adrenal Insufficiency Is Rare in Adults With Prader–Willi Syndrome”

PMCID: PMC7289190  PMID: 32443153

In the above-named article by Rosenberg AGW, Pellikaan K, Poitou C, Goldstone AP, Høybye C, Markovic T, Grugni G, Crinò A, Caixàs A, Coupaye M, Van Den Berg SAA, Van Der Lely AJ, and De Graaff LCG (J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(7):1–9; doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa168), the following errors occurred in Table 3. Results of the insulin tolerance test:

Table 3.

Results of the insulin tolerance test

Baseline Cortisol (nmol/L) Peak Cortisol (nmol/L) Glucose (mmol/L)a Baseline ACTH (pmol/L) Peak ACTH (pmol/L) Delta ACTH (pmol/L)b CAI Cut-off (nmol/L)c
France (n = 10)
 Median 229.0 735.5 1.6 N/A N/A N/A <500
 Range 102.0–384.0 494.0–1021.0 0.6–2.2 N/A N/A N/A
The Netherlands (n = 10)
 Median 233.0 702.0 1.9 3.3 61.2 57.1 <500
 Range 119.0–502.0 530.0–883.0 1.4–2.4 1.1–6.2 23.8–93.5 21.2–90.5
Sweden (n = 6)
 Median 185.5 722.5 1.7 N/A N/A N/A <500
 Range 175.0–265.0 502.0–822.0 1.2–2.6 N/A N/A N/A
United Kingdom (n = 10)
 Median 172.5 522.5 1.5 3.7 N/A N/A <450
 Range 93.0–545.0 455.0–971.0d 1.0–2.1 1.7–6.4 N/A N/A

Abbreviations: CAI, central adrenal insufficiency. N/A, not available.

a Two patients had glucose levels of 2.4 mmol/L and 2.6 mmol/L, respectively. All other patients had glucose levels ≤ 2.2 mmol/L. b Increase in ACTH after insulin administration. c Peak cortisol cutoff for diagnosis of CAI. One French patient had peak cortisol < 500 nmol/L. d In the UK, the cutoff for CAI is 450 nmol/L (see also: methods).

For the UK cohort, the values in the column “Baseline ACTH (pmol/L)” are incorrect. The correct median is 3.7 pmol/L instead of 17.5 pmol/L and the correct range is 1.7–6.4 pmol/L instead of 93.0–545.0 pmol/L.

Additionally, a superscript “a” after the range in the column “Peak cortisol (nmol/L)” for the UK cohort should not have appeared in the published table. The full corrected table is below:


Articles from The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES