Abstract
Background
Limited research exists on interest in and use of smoking cessation support in pregnancy and postpartum.
Methods
A longitudinal cohort of pregnant smokers and recent ex-smokers were recruited in Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom (N = 850). Data were collected at 8–26 weeks gestation, 34–36 weeks gestation, and 3 months postpartum and used as three cross-sectional surveys. Interest and use of cessation support and belief and behavior measures were collected at all waves. Key data were adjusted for nonresponse and analyzed descriptively, and multiple regression was used to identify associations.
Results
In early and late pregnancy, 44% (95% CI 40% to 48%) and 43% (95% CI 37% to 49%) of smokers, respectively, were interested in cessation support with 33% (95% CI 27% to 39%) interested postpartum. In early pregnancy, 43% of smokers reported discussing cessation with a midwife and, in late pregnancy, 27% did so. Over one-third (38%) did not report discussing quitting with a health professional during pregnancy. Twenty-seven percent of smokers reported using any National Health Service (NHS) cessation support and 12% accessed NHS Stop Smoking Services during pregnancy. Lower quitting confidence (self-efficacy), higher confidence in stopping with support, higher quitting motivation, and higher age were associated with higher interest in support (ps ≤ .001). A recent quit attempt and greater interest in support was associated with speaking to a health professional about quitting and use of NHS cessation support (ps ≤ .001).
Conclusions
When asked in early or late pregnancy, about half of pregnant smokers were interested in cessation support, though most did not engage. Cessation support should be offered throughout pregnancy and after delivery.
Implications
There is relatively high interest in cessation support in early and late pregnancy and postpartum among smokers; however, a much smaller proportion of pregnant or postpartum women access any cessation support, highlighting a gap between interest and engagement. Reflecting women’s interest, offers of cessation support should be provided throughout pregnancy and after delivery. Increasing motivation to quit and confidence in quitting with assistance may enhance interest in support, and promoting the discussion of stopping smoking between women and health practitioners may contribute to higher support engagement rates.
Introduction
Reducing smoking rates in pregnancy remains a global public health priority.1 While smoking in pregnancy rates have continued to reduce over the last decade,2 rates remain relatively high in many European and American nations. The United Kingdom is among the countries with the highest smoking in pregnancy rates.2 Based on routinely collected data at the time of delivery in England in 2018,3 recent reductions of smoking in pregnancy rates appears to have stalled, remaining at 11%. Increased efforts and new approaches are likely needed in order to reach the English national ambition of no more than 6% of women smoking in pregnancy by the end of 2022.4
One key approach to reducing smoking in pregnancy is the provision of smoking cessation support. Guidance from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that all pregnant women are carbon monoxide (CO) breath tested, with all those identified as smokers provided with risk information and referred to local National Health Service (NHS) Stop Smoking Services (SSS) for specialist behavioral support and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) where appropriate.5 This “opt-out” referral pathway can increase both access rates to the English SSS, from 11% to 18% in one site,6 and abstinence rates.6,7 Use of other smoking cessation support among pregnant smokers is largely unknown. This includes discussions about stopping smoking with health professionals, the use of the NHS telephone helpline, and use of NRT outside of the SSS other than in primary care, where NRT prescription rates around the time of pregnancy are estimated to be 11%.8
A likely important factor in accessing or accepting the offer of cessation support in pregnancy is an individual’s interest in the support being offered. There have been very few assessments of interest in cessation support among pregnant smokers and, when undertaken, this has been only for a limited selection of interventions. An English cross-sectional study conducted in 2004 found that 60% of pregnant smokers interviewed in early pregnancy indicated an interest in receiving help with stopping, with interest highest for in-person behavioral support followed closely by self-help materials.9 We are not aware of any longitudinal studies examining interest in cessation support over time during pregnancy, nor for a wider selection of intervention types, though findings have shown that quit attempts continue throughout pregnancy and postpartum, suggesting interest may be maintained over time.10 Findings from such work could help prioritize which type of support to offer and when. For example, in recent years, self-help has emerged as a promising and low-cost approach to supporting cessation in pregnancy. Reviews have demonstrated that self-help11 and digital self-help12 cessation interventions are effective in pregnancy. Currently, though, we do not know how pregnant smokers view these types of interventions and how interested they are in using them.
Little is also known about which characteristics of pregnant smokers are associated with interest in or the uptake of cessation support. Existing studies have shown that interest in cessation counseling among pregnant smokers is associated with being older, having a lower income, having a significant other who advises quitting, and lower quitting confidence.13 Accepting a referral or accessing specialist cessation support is associated with having a mental health problem, when pregnant women with and without mental health problems were compared,14 and, among postpartum smokers, higher education.15 However, these cross-sectional studies have only investigated a relatively narrow range of potential predictors. Identifying predictors of interest and uptake of a variety of cessation support in this population will help guide and inform interventions that aim to increase support engagement.
The primary aim of this study was to assess the interest in, use of, and attitudes toward smoking cessation support during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period among current or recent ex-smokers. Our secondary aims were to identify predictors of interest in and use of cessation support during pregnancy and to identify perceived barriers to using self-help cessation support over the pregnancy and postpartum period.
Methods
Design
Three cross-sectional surveys, taken from a longitudinal cohort of pregnant and postpartum women (the Pregnancy Lifestyle Survey), were used for this study.10,16 Data were collected at 8–26 weeks gestation (wave 1), 34–36 weeks gestation (wave 2), and 3 months after childbirth (wave 3).
Participants
Women aged 16 years or above, between 8 and 26 weeks pregnant, and who self-reported being either current smokers (self-reported occasional smokers or daily smokers) or having smoked in the 3 months prior to becoming pregnant were eligible for participation. Women who were unable to understand study procedures sufficiently to provide consent or were unable to read or understand the written questionnaires in English were excluded.
Procedure
Recruitment to the Pregnancy Lifestyle Survey took place between August 2011 and August 2012 at two antenatal clinics within Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (City Hospital and Queen’s Medical Centre). To ensure representative sampling, researchers attended on average five different clinic sessions per week. All women self-reporting to be between 8 and 26 weeks gestation attending routine antenatal appointments at these clinics were invited by a researcher or a member of clinic staff to complete an anonymous screening questionnaire to determine study eligibility. Those who met the criteria were directed to read a participant information sheet describing the study and, if willing, to then complete a baseline questionnaire; women could also seek further information from the researcher/staff member. On completion of the baseline questionnaire, women were offered a £5 high street shopping voucher as recognition for the time taken to complete the questionnaire. Written informed consent was obtained from those who wished to complete the two follow-up questionnaires, who made up the sample of the study.
All participants were posted a second questionnaire at 34–36 weeks gestation. In addition, participants who provided an e-mail address were e-mailed a link to a web-based version of the questionnaire and sent one e-mail reminder. Nonrespondents were sent one postal/e-mail reminder letter and then contacted by telephone; if no response was received, participants were texted a reminder. Participants who were successfully contacted via telephone were invited to complete the questionnaire during the call.
Participants were sent the final questionnaire 3 months after their delivery using the same method as described above for follow-up in later pregnancy. All participants who completed follow-up questionnaires were sent a £5 shopping voucher for each follow-up.
A more detailed description of the procedure for enrollment and data collection and sample characteristics is provided elsewhere.16 The study was approved by Derbyshire Research Ethics Proportionate Review Sub-Committee (11/EM/0078).
Measures
Copies of the questionnaires used at each wave can be found in a separate publication.10 The questions used in the current study are described below and used a range of response formats including yes/no responses, multiple choices, and five-point Likert-type scales for attitudinal items.
Interest, Use, and Attitudes Toward Smoking Cessation Support
At all three waves, participants were asked to rate their interest in receiving help with stopping smoking in general and their interest in, difficulty in using, and perceived usefulness of nine different types of smoking cessation support using a 1–5 scale (“not at all” to “extremely”). These were split into health practitioner-orientated support (telephone helpline, group sessions, and one-to-one sessions) and self-help support (booklet, DVD, web site, text messages, e-mail, and smartphone/digital device application). Participants were also asked to indicate whether they had accessed any of the cessation support offered by the NHS, though not necessarily delivered by the NHS, since finding out they were pregnant (wave 1) or since completing the last survey (waves 2 and 3). These included talking to a General Practitioner (GP)/nurse or midwife about stopping smoking, attending an NHS Stop Smoking Service group or individual session, calling a stop smoking helpline, or using NRT (from any source). At baseline only, participants were asked about their access to electronic/digital devices for using self-help. In all three waves, participants were asked to indicate from a list of statements, informed by prior work,13 any potential barriers toward accessing or using self-help cessation support.
Predetermined Predictor Variables of Interest and Use of Cessation Support
A broad range of potential demographic and psychosocial predictors were included based on previous evidence in predicting interest or uptake in cessation support13–15 and cessation17,18; although relatively little is known about this, we had no prior hypotheses regarding potential associations. Background and health predictors included gestation, general health (general health rating from excellent to poor and whether they had a long-standing physical or mental illness or disability),19 depression (during the past month bothered by feeling down, depressed, or hopeless or having little interest or pleasure in doing things),20 the Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4),21 ethnicity, age, and index of multiple deprivation.22 Smoking-related predictors included general smoking behavior,23,24 urges to smoke,25 partner’s smoking status, nicotine dependence using the “Heaviness of Smoking Index,” 26 intentions and determination to quit smoking and confidence (self-efficacy) in achieving this,27 support for stopping smoking from friends/family, beliefs about the harm of smoking during pregnancy,27 and whether participant had talked to a health professional (midwife, nurse, or GP) about quitting. Smoking-related norm predictors included injunctive norm (“people important to me think I should stop smoking”) and descriptive norm (knowing others who smoked throughout pregnancy).28
Sample Size and Analysis
The sample size calculation for the cohort survey was based on estimating the number of quit attempts initiated during pregnancy among smokers and is reported elsewhere.16
Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to report interest in and use of smoking cessation services as well as attitudes to smoking cessation support and barriers to self-help use for all three waves. For the prevalence estimates of interest in and attitudes toward smoking cessation support among smokers, responses were dichotomized by grouping the five possible responses: not at all/a little (no interest) versus moderately/very much/extremely (interest), with the same thresholds for determining low versus high perceived usefulness and difficulty accessing/using. Multiple imputation using chained equations was performed using 20 iterations29 for the percentage who were interested in cessation support at late pregnancy and postpartum. Missing data on interest in and attitudes toward smoking cessation support was imputed using a logit imputation method based on the following baseline factors: maternal age, ethnicity, highest educational qualification, gestation of pregnancy, smoking status, urge to smoke, general health status, depression status, parity, and smoking status in previous pregnancy.
For the exploratory analysis investigating potential correlates of general interest in cessation support at baseline, discussion of stopping smoking with a health professional at baseline, and use of NHS cessation support (telephone helpline, group sessions, one-to-one sessions, or NRT) in late pregnancy, we used linear regression and logistic regression to test the univariable associations with baseline characteristics. Interest was measured on a 1–5 scale and use was coded as a binary “use” or “nonuse” variable. Following this, all predictors that were associated with interest in or use of cessation support in the univariable analyses at p < .1 were included in multivariable models,30 providing they were not found to be collinear (variance inflation factor ≥10). Missing data for the predictor variables (i.e., not having answered survey questions at either baseline or late pregnancy follow-up) were addressed through including missing data as either an additional category for categorical variables or using a dummy variable to indicate missingness for continuous variables. As two out of three of the predictor analyses were cross-sectional and they were part of a secondary aim of the study, we did not perform multiple imputation for these.
Results
At the late pregnancy and postpartum follow-ups, 509 (60%) and 476 (56%) of baseline participants completed a questionnaire respectively. Table 1 presents the baseline sample characteristics (N = 850), full details of which are reported elsewhere.16 On average, participants were 26 years old and 16 weeks gestation at baseline. One-third reported that the current pregnancy was their first and, among those who had been pregnant before, around two-thirds smoked during their last pregnancy. Fifty-seven percent reported being current smokers and, among these, over half had a partner who smoked. Almost all respondents owned a mobile phone (97%) and 71% percent owned a smartphone.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the cohort (N = 850)
| Characteristic | Mean (SD) |
|---|---|
| Gestation (weeks) (n = 806) | 15.6 (4.1) |
| Age (n = 847) | 25.8 (5.6) |
| Perceived stress scale (PSS-4) (n = 819) | 10.6 (3.5)* |
| n (%)** | |
| Qualifications: GCSEs or similar*** | 594/850 (69.9) |
| Home ownership | 166/846 (19.6) |
| Cars or vans available for use in household | 446/839 (53.2) |
| In paid work | 383/850 (45.1) |
| Ethnicity: Caucasian | 783/844 (92.8) |
| Baseline smoker | 488/850 (57.4) |
| First pregnancy | 275/839 (32.8) |
| If pregnant before, smoked during last pregnancy | 368/561 (65.6) |
| Owns a mobile phone | 776/797 (97.4) |
| Owns a smartphone | 547/774 (70.7) |
| Mobile phone bundle includes free text messages | 610/778 (78.4) |
*Maximum score on PSS-4 is 16.
**Numbers may not add up to 850 (total sample size) due to missing data.
***General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) is a qualification/exam taken by school students in the United Kingdom (except Scotland) usually when aged between 14 and 16 years old.
Interest and Use of Cessation Support and Perceived Barriers to Accessing Self-Help
At baseline, during early pregnancy, 44% (95% CI 40% to 48%) of current smokers (Table 2) and 9% (95% CI 6% to 12%) of recent ex-smokers (not shown in table) reported being interested in receiving help with stopping smoking. Among smokers, the specific support types rated of most interest were one-to-one sessions (42%), followed by self-help booklets (39%). Imputed survey results showed that interest in support to stop smoking, among smokers, changed little in late pregnancy (43%; 95% CI 37% to 49%) relative to early pregnancy but dropped to 33% (95% CI 27% to 39%) 3 months postpartum. Self-help booklets were of most interest (49%) followed by self-help web sites (45%) in late pregnancy. Across all timepoints, one-to-one sessions had the highest perceived usefulness and self-help support had the lowest levels of perceived difficulty to access and use.
Table 2.
Interest in and attitudes toward smoking cessation support among smokers (N = 488)
| Type of support* | Early pregnancy (8–26 weeks gestation) | Late pregnancy (34–36 weeks gestation)** | Postpartum (3 months)** |
|---|---|---|---|
| n (%, 95% CI) | % (95% CI) | % (95% CI) | |
| Interest in receiving help with stopping | 212 (44.0, 39.5 to 48.4) | 42.8 (37.0 to 48.6) | 32.9 (26.9 to 38.8) |
| Health professional telephone helpline | |||
| Interest | 92 (20.5) | 25.2 | 21.8 |
| Perceived usefulness | 112 (24.7) | 24.6 | 25.5 |
| Difficulty accessing/using | 153 (34.3) | 30.9 | 31.9 |
| Health professional group sessions | |||
| Interest | 62 (14.1) | 14.9 | 12.2 |
| Perceived usefulness | 128 (28.3) | 28.0 | 24.9 |
| Difficulty accessing/using | 179 (40.3) | 39.5 | 43.0 |
| Health professional one-to-one | |||
| Interest | 190 (41.7) | 43.9 | 38.1 |
| Perceived usefulness | 225 (49.2) | 49.8 | 48.3 |
| Difficulty accessing/using | 155 (34.9) | 33.0 | 34.0 |
| Self-help booklet | |||
| Interest | 177 (39.3) | 48.9 | 39.3 |
| Perceived usefulness | 182 (40.1) | 46.0 | 36.6 |
| Difficulty accessing/using | 135 (30.1) | 21.5 | 20.3 |
| Self-help DVD | |||
| Interest | 154 (34.8) | 37.9 | 29.0 |
| Perceived usefulness | 163 (36.1) | 39.8 | 29.8 |
| Difficulty accessing/using | 130 (29.3) | 20.5 | 24.8 |
| Self-help web site | |||
| Interest | 148 (33.9) | 44.7 | 37.0 |
| Perceived usefulness | 160 (35.5) | 42.2 | 32.1 |
| Difficulty accessing/using | 132 (30.1) | 24.2 | 27.7 |
| Self-help text messages | |||
| Interest | 133 (30.5) | 40.5 | 30.4 |
| Perceived usefulness | 138 (30.5) | 40.2 | 30.3 |
| Difficulty accessing/using | 128 (28.8) | 23.1 | 22.6 |
| Self-help emails | |||
| Interest | 112 (25.7) | 32.8 | 24.2 |
| Perceived usefulness | 124 (27.5) | 32.2 | 24.7 |
| Difficulty accessing/using | 138 (31.0) | 25.8 | 24.3 |
| Self-help phone app | |||
| Interest | 146 (33.2) | 40.2 | 36.3 |
| Perceived usefulness | 159 (35.3) | 43.3 | 37.0 |
| Difficulty accessing/using | 136 (30.7) | 25.4 | 22.7 |
*Responses were dichotomized by grouping the five possible responses: not at all/a little (no interest) versus moderately/very much/extremely (interest). The same approach was used for perceived usefulness (low vs. high perceived usefulness) and difficulty accessing/using (low vs. high difficulty).
**Missing data were generated using multiple imputation “by chained equations for dichotomized interest in cessation support amongst smokers in early and late pregnancy and in postpartum period.”
In early pregnancy, less than half of smokers (43%) reported having talked to a midwife about stopping smoking and fewer had spoken to a GP or nurse (27%) about this (Table 3). Between early and late pregnancy, 27% of smokers reported speaking to a midwife about stopping. Across the whole of pregnancy, over one-third (38%) of smokers did not report having talked with either a midwife, GP, or nurse about stopping smoking (not shown in table).
Table 3.
Reported use of National Health Service (NHS) provided smoking cessation support split by smoking status
| Type of support* | Early pregnancy | Early–late pregnancy** | Postpartum | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recent ex-smoker (N = 362) | Smoker (N = 488) | Recent ex-smoker (N = 265)*** | Smoker (N = 256)*** | Recent ex-smoker (N = 196) | Smoker (N = 280) | |
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |
| Talked to GP/Nurse about giving up | 22 (6.1) | 132 (27.0) | 3 (1.1) | 28 (10.9) | 3 (1.5) | 36 (12.9) |
| Talked to midwife about giving up | 36 (9.9) | 211 (43.2) | 16 (6.0) | 68 (26.6) | 3 (1.5) | 24 (8.6) |
| Accessed/used any NHS smoking cessation support | 29 (8.0) | 90 (18.4) | 21 (7.9) | 66 (25.8) | 6 (3.1) | 38 (13.6) |
| Attended NHS stop smoking service group session | 3 (0.8) | 21 (4.3) | 1 (0.4) | 10 (3.9) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (1.8) |
| Attended solo/individual NHS stop smoking service session | 10 (2.8) | 25 (5.1) | 15 (5.7) | 23 (9.0) | 1 (0.5) | 7 (2.5) |
| Called a stop smoking telephone helpline | 5 (1.4) | 18 (3.7) | 3 (1.1) | 7 (2.7) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (1.8) |
| Used nicotine replacement therapy | 25 (6.9) | 64 (13.1) | 16 (6.0) | 57 (22.3) | 6 (3.1) | 31 (11.1) |
*Noncumulative support usage. Rates in each time period do not include usage in earlier time period and represent what was reported in each questionnaire.
**Period between the early pregnancy questionnaire and the late questionnaire. Includes 10 women who had given birth prior to completing the 34-week questionnaire
Out of those participants who smoked at all during pregnancy, 12% reported accessing Stop Smoking Service support (group or one-to-one support) at some point in their pregnancy (not shown in table). Across the whole of pregnancy 17% of participants reported accessing at least one form of NHS-provided cessation support, which rose to 27% when restricted to those reporting smoking at both baseline and end of pregnancy (not shown in table). The most common type of support used was NRT without additional behavioral support (Table 3).
In early pregnancy, the most common barriers for using self-help cessation support was preferring to receive support from a health professional (19% smokers, 6% recent ex-smokers) and thinking self-help would not be of much help with quitting (14% smokers, 7% recent ex-smokers). These remained the two most common barriers at the two follow-up timepoints.
Factors Associated With Interest in Cessation Support Among Smokers in Early Pregnancy
Among smokers, 11 out of 23 prespecified variables were univariable correlates of interest in receiving cessation support in general at baseline (p < .05; Table 4). When these were entered into a multivariable model, the following five predictors remained statistically significant: higher determination to quit (B = 0.42, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.54), lower confidence in stopping until the end of pregnancy (B = −0.23, 95% CI −0.35 to −0.12), higher confidence in stopping with health professional support (B = 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.33), having spoken to a health professional about stopping (B = 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.98), and higher age (B = 0.03, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.05).
Table 4.
Univariable and multivariable models for correlates/predictors among smokers of (1) general interest in cessation support at baseline and (2) use of National Health Service cessation support in late pregnancy
| Baseline variables | Dependent variable: interest in cessation support at baseline (N = 482) | Dependent variable: use of cessation support in late pregnancy (N = 263) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariable model | Multivariable model | Univariable model | Multivariable model | |||||||||
| Beta | p | 95% CI | Beta | p | 95% CI | OR | p | 95% CI | OR | p | 95% CI | |
| Smoked in a prior pregnancy | −0.126 | .336 | −0.38, 0.13 | 0.89 | .690 | 0.51, 1.56 | ||||||
| Heaviness of Smoking Index | 0.039 | .396 | −0.05, 0.13 | 1.08 | .486 | 0.87, 1.34 | ||||||
| Urges to smoke | 0.009 | .791 | −0.06, 0.07 | 1.00 | .972 | 0.88, 1.15 | ||||||
| Has tried to quit (y/n) | 0.716 | <.001 | 0.47, 0.96 | 3.03 | .001 | 1.60, 5.73 | 2.70 | .006 | 1.34, 5.46 | |||
| Number of 24-h quit attempts | −0.022 | .036 | −0.04, 0.00 | 0.97 | .465 | 0.89, 1.06 | ||||||
| Seriously planning to quit | 0.491 | <.001 | 0.40, 0.58 | 1.65 | <.001 | 1.30, 2.08 | ||||||
| Determination to stop till baby born | 0.507 | <.001 | 0.42, 0.59 | 0.423 | <.001 | 0.31, 0.54 | 1.71 | <.001 | 1.32, 2.20 | |||
| Confidence to stop till baby born | 0.217 | <001 | 0.12, 0.31 | −0.231 | <.001 | −0.35, −0.12 | 1.24 | .049 | 1.00, 1.54 | |||
| Confidence to stop alone | 0.026 | .596 | −0.07, 0.12 | 0.89 | .339 | 0.71, 1.13 | ||||||
| Confidence to stop with health professional help | 0.425 | <.001 | 0.33, 0.52 | 0.216 | <.001 | 0.11, 0.33 | 1.36 | .008 | 1.08, 1.70 | |||
| Beliefs on harms of smoking to baby | 0.774 | <.001 | 0.43, 1.11 | 3.05 | .026 | 1.14, 8.11 | ||||||
| Knows others who smoked in pregnancy | −0.035 | .863 | −0.43, 0.36 | 1.40 | .484 | 0.54, 3.61 | ||||||
| People important to me think I should stop | 0.605 | <.001 | 0.33, 0.88 | 1.69 | .132 | 0.85, 3.33 | ||||||
| Has support to stop | 0.304 | .025 | 0.04, 0.57 | 1.73 | .104 | 0.89, 3.36 | ||||||
| Partner smokes | 0.041 | .760 | −0.22, 0.30 | 0.90 | .729 | 0.50, 1.62 | ||||||
| Spoken to health professional about stopping | 1.212 | <.001 | 0.99, 1.43 | 0.765 | <.001 | 0.55, 0.98 | 3.29 | <.001 | 1.80, 6.01 | |||
| General health | −0.206 | .244 | −0.55, 0.14 | 1.67 | .283 | 0.66, 4.24 | ||||||
| Depression | 0.169 | .276 | −0.14, 0.47 | 0.94 | .877 | 0.46, 1.95 | ||||||
| Perceived Stress Scale | 0.008 | .706 | −0.04, 0.05 | 0.99 | .871 | 0.90, 1.10 | ||||||
| Gestation (weeks) | −0.022 | .152 | −0.05, 0.01 | 0.97 | .386 | 0.91, 1.04 | ||||||
| Ethnic minority | −0.143 | .609 | −0.69, 0.41 | 0.76 | .640 | 0.24, 2.39 | ||||||
| Age | 0.032 | .006 | 0.01, 0.05 | 0.030 | .001 | 0.01, 0.05 | 1.09 | .001 | 1.03, 1.14 | 1.08 | .006 | 1.02, 1.15 |
| Deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation) | −0.004 | .274 | −0.01, 0.00 | 1.00 | .638 | 0.98, 1.01 | ||||||
| Interest in support at baseline | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.91 | <.001 | 1.53, 2.37 | 1.80 | <.001 | 1.43, 2.27 |
Factors Associated With Discussing Stopping Smoking With a Health Professional Among Smokers in Early Pregnancy
Ten out of 23 prespecified baseline variables were univariable correlates (p < .05) of whether or not smokers reported having had a discussion with a health professional (midwife, nurse, or GP) about quitting smoking in early pregnancy (Supplementary Table S1). Of these, two remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis: having previously tried to quit during the current pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 3.0, 95% CI 2.0 to 4.6) and interest in support (OR 5.4, 95% CI 3.6 to 8.2).
Predictors of use of NHS cessation support among smokers by late pregnancy
Nine baseline variables were associated with use of NHS-provided cessation support by late pregnancy (p < .05) among baseline smokers (Table 4). Three variables remained statistically significant in the multivariable model: having previously tried to quit during the current pregnancy (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.5), older age (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.1), and interest in support (OR 1.8 95% CI 1.4 to 2.3).
Discussion
This study found that a substantial minority of pregnant smokers are interested in getting smoking cessation support and that this level of interest is as high at the end of pregnancy and drops only a modest amount by 3 months postpartum. While there is relatively high interest in cessation support, a much smaller proportion of women accessed any cessation support in pregnancy, highlighting a gap between interest and engagement. Our study indicates that speaking to a health care professional about stopping smoking, being motivated to stop, and having low confidence in doing so without assistance could influence interest in NHS-provided cessation support. Interest in support, in turn, prospectively predicted use of NHS cessation support. However, women who had not tried to quit early on in their pregnancy were less likely to have used support later on in pregnancy compared with those who had tried to quit, independent of quitting motivation and interest in support. This suggests that the process of trying and failing to quit may be helpful for some by prompting them to seek assistance.
Strengths and Limitations
We believe this was the first longitudinal cohort study looking at smoking cessation support interest and use over pregnancy and into the postpartum period. We examined women’s views and use of a broad range of support types, across the three timepoints in a large cohort. Although participants were recruited from one area, the sample as a whole demonstrated similar characteristics to pregnant smokers in national cohort studies16 and so key findings may be generalizable to pregnant smokers across the United Kingdom. Furthermore, very few prior studies have examined a wide range of potential predictors of interest and use of cessation support.
Common to many cohort studies, we experienced moderate attrition at follow-ups. Although not excessive and we minimized the impact of this by performing multiple imputation for key variables, this is a limitation. A further limitation is that we did not collect data during the second trimester of participant’s pregnancies, and so there may have been fluctuations in variables of interest that we were unable to capture. Also, we did not collect data on views and use of e-cigarettes in this survey as, when the survey was carried out, e-cigarette usage was still relatively low. We have now undertaken research to explore this in pregnancy in several separate recent studies.31,32 Similarly, the use of smartphone apps were somewhat lower when the study was undertaken compared to current usage, and interest in this may have grown in recent years. While our analysis investigating predictors of use of support was prospective, the correlates of interest in cessation support and discussion about stopping smoking analyses were cross-sectional and so we are limited in our ability to indicate possible directions of causality.
Findings in Context
Our finding that just under half of pregnant smokers were interested in receiving cessation support in early pregnancy corresponds closely with Ussher et al.9 who found in 2004 that 60% of women were interested in cessation support in early pregnancy. As with this prior study, our data also showed similar interest levels between self-help and one-to-one cessation support, with low interest in group support. However, in our study, the point estimates for difficulty accessing one-to-one support were higher across all waves than the self-help options, suggesting perceived access could inhibit uptake, particularly in late pregnancy. No studies have previously explored the relative interest in different types of self-help among pregnant women. Booklets were of most interest across all waves and with mostly the highest perceived usefulness compared to other estimates for self-help types. Though there were only minor differences between the self-help types, e-mail appeared to be of least interest and perceived usefulness.
Despite relatively high rates of interest in one-to-one cessation support among baseline smokers (42%), only a small proportion (12%) of our cohort who smoked at all during pregnancy reported using the NHS Stop Smoking Services. This very closely matches the 11% access rate identified from NHS records in another study in the same region, prior to implementation of an opt-out pathway.6 Low rates of access to specialist cessation support among pregnant smokers has been reported historically33,34 and can be increased using an opt-out referral pathway,6,7, which also increases abstinence. The most common type of cessation support used by women in our cohort that the NHS provides was NRT. This is despite safety concerns and reluctance to recommend NRT among many practitioners.35,36 However, use of NRT without guidance or behavioral support is unlikely to be effective in pregnancy as even with guidance and support it is only of borderline efficacy37 and use of over-the-counter NRT is not associated with abstinence in the general population.38 Suboptimal adherence39,40 and increased nicotine metabolism41 indicate that higher doses of NRT combined with adherence support is likely required to make NRT more effective in pregnancy.
In line with a further study,13 we found higher age and lower quitting self-efficacy associated with interest in receiving support. We also found a positive association between confidence in quitting with a health professional’s help and support interest, which had not been examined before. Prior international research has found that while most practitioners working with pregnant women ask about smoking status,42,43 far fewer discuss cessation and only around one-third discuss treatment options.42–44 Our findings broadly support this from the U.K. pregnant women’s perspective – fewer than two-thirds of smokers in our sample reported discussing stopping smoking with a practitioner. U.K. research undertaken over the last two decades report similar findings suggesting that little has changed in this regard.13,45
Implications for Practice
One key implication is that, based on findings related to interest levels, the offer of cessation support should be provided throughout pregnancy and postpartum. In the United Kingdom at least, currently policy relating to the offer of cessation support is weighted toward early pregnancy, even if strictly following NICE guidance.5 This is reflected by our findings, where we found far fewer smokers reporting a discussion with a health professional about stopping smoking in mid-to-late pregnancy compared with early pregnancy. This matches other research showing that less than one quarter of health professionals follow up women after an initial discussion about smoking,14,44 which can inadvertently reassure women that quitting smoking may not be a priority.46
To promote interest in cessation support, which was predictive of accessing support, our findings suggest that increasing motivation to stop smoking, ensuring health professionals discuss stopping smoking, and enhancing women’s confidence that their chances of stopping smoking are higher if they receive professional support are important targets for interventions. Practitioners often do not initiate discussions about quitting smoking with pregnant clients because of low levels of confidence, feelings of being underskilled, and concern about damaging the client relationship.35 The use of carbon monoxide monitoring may help with facilitating a discussion about stopping smoking, from both the perspective of practitioners35,47 and pregnant women,48 and enhance motivation to quit. When combined with an opt-out referral, it can increase the uptake of support.6,7 Training health practitioners can also increase the assessment of smoking and support provision49, and the use of prompts in maternity paperwork and electronic systems may also facilitate appropriate discussions.35 In terms of factors influencing uptake of support, being younger was associated with a reduced likelihood of using practitioner-orientated cessation support. This suggests a potential targeting opportunity.
Our findings also reinforce previous research9 by highlighting the popularity of self-help cessation support. Current UK guidance only recommends promoting self-help to those who accept the offer of formal cessation support but who are struggling to engage.5 This may be a missed opportunity, given recent evidence of effectiveness of digital self-help approaches for pregnant smokers,12 particularly when delivered by SMS text message.27,50
One less prominent but nonetheless important finding was that some of the most predictive factors in determining smoking and a failure to quit smoking in pregnancy, that is, socioeconomic status/deprivation, nicotine dependence, and having a partner that smokes,17 did not predict interest in or use of support in our cohort. From a public health perspective, this is positive and suggests these factors may not inhibit the seeking of and acceptance of cessation support.
Conclusion
Almost half of pregnant smokers in our cohort were interested in help to stop smoking and this changed little from early to late pregnancy. Yet rates of discussing stopping smoking with a health professional reduced after early pregnancy and a substantial minority of pregnant smokers did not report having a discussion with a health professional about stopping at any point in pregnancy. With one-quarter of smokers accessing any NHS-provided support and less than half of these accessing stop smoking services, the gap between support interest and access indicates a missed opportunity. Our findings indicate that increasing motivation to quit, enhancing interest in support, the discussion of stopping smoking with health practitioners, and confidence in quitting with cessation support may contribute to higher support use rates. In addition, nonroutine forms of cessation support, including self-help, should be promoted given evidence of effectiveness, low cost, and their popularity among this population.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary data are available at Nicotine and Tobacco Research online.
Funding
This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Programme Grants for Applied Research programme RP-PG-0109-10020. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Declaration of Interests
None declared.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust for facilitating this research. We also thank Rachel Whitemore for invaluable assistance in setting up this research. Tim Coleman acknowledges the support of the East Midlands Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLARHC). Prof. Coleman is an NIHR Senior Investigator.
References
- 1. Ussher M, Naughton F, Notley C, Bauld L. Smoking and pregnancy: risk factors, women’s experiences, and interventions. In: Ussher J, Chrisler J, Perz J, eds. Routledge International Handbook of Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health. London, UK: Routledge; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lange S, Probst C, Rehm J, Popova S. National, regional, and global prevalence of smoking during pregnancy in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(7):e769-e776. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30223–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Statistics on Women’s Smoking Status at Time of Delivery, England—2017–18.2018; http://content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB20899/stat-wome-smok-time-deli-eng-q4-15-16-rep.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2018.
- 4. Department of Health and Social Care. Tobacco Control Delivery Plan 2017–2022. London, UK: Department of Health and Social Care; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Quitting Smoking in Pregnancy and Following Childbirth. NICE Public Health Guidance 26. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Campbell KA, Cooper S, Fahy SJ, et al. “Opt-out” referrals after identifying pregnant smokers using exhaled air carbon monoxide: impact on engagement with smoking cessation support. Tob Control. 2017;26(3):300–306. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015–052662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bell R, Glinianaia SV, Waal ZV, et al. Evaluation of a complex healthcare intervention to increase smoking cessation in pregnant women: interrupted time series analysis with economic evaluation. Tob Control. 2018;27(1):90–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dhalwani NN, Szatkowski L, Coleman T, Fiaschi L, Tata LJ. Prescribing of nicotine replacement therapy in and around pregnancy: a population-based study using primary care data. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(626):e554–560. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X681361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ussher M, West R, Hibbs N. A survey of pregnant smokers’ interest in different types of smoking cessation support. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;54(1):67–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cooper S, Orton S, Leonardi-Bee J, et al. Smoking and quit attempts during pregnancy and postpartum: a longitudinal UK cohort. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Naughton F, Prevost AT, Sutton S. Self-help smoking cessation interventions in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2008;103(4):566–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Griffiths SE, Parsons J, Naughton F, Fulton EA, Tombor I, Brown KE. Are digital interventions for smoking cessation in pregnancy effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2018;12(4):333–356. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1488602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ussher M, Etter JF, West R. Perceived barriers to and benefits of attending a stop smoking course during pregnancy. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(3):467–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Howard LM, Bekele D, Rowe M, Demilew J, Bewley S, Marteau TM. Smoking cessation in pregnant women with mental disorders: a cohort and nested qualitative study. BJOG. 2013;120(3):362–370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Röske K, Hannöver W, Kelbsch J, Thyrian JR, John U, Hapke U. The readiness of women, after they have given birth to children, to participate in individualized counselling for smoking cessation. Gesundheitswesen. 2004;66(10):697–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Orton S, Bowker K, Cooper S, et al. Longitudinal cohort survey of women’s smoking behaviour and attitudes in pregnancy: study methods and baseline data. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Riaz M, Lewis S, Naughton F, Ussher M. Predictors of smoking cessation during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2018;113(4):610–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Orton S, Coleman T, Coleman-Haynes T, Ussher M. Predictors of postpartum return to smoking: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(6):665–673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. National Centre for Longitudinal Studies. Millennium Cohort Study, First Survey: CAPI Questionnaire Documentation. London, UK: Centre for Longitudinal Studies; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 20. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health: Clinical Management and Service Guidance. London, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cohen S, Williamson GM. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. Soc Psychol Health. 1988;1:31–67. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Noble M, McLennan D, Wilkinson K, et al. The English Indices of Deprivation 2007. London, UK: Whetherby; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Coleman T, Thornton J, Britton J, et al. Protocol for the smoking, nicotine and pregnancy (SNAP) trial: double-blind, placebo-randomised, controlled trial of nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mullen PD, Carbonari JP, Tabak ER, Glenday MC. Improving disclosure of smoking by pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(2):409–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. West R, Hajek P. Evaluation of the mood and physical symptoms scale (MPSS) to assess cigarette withdrawal. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004;177(1–2):195–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Rickert W, Robinson J. Measuring the heaviness of smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Br J Addict. 1989;84(7):791–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Naughton F, Prevost AT, Gilbert H, Sutton S. Randomized controlled trial evaluation of a tailored leaflet and SMS text message self-help intervention for pregnant smokers (MiQuit). Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(5):569–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. The Influence of attitudes on behaviour. In: Albarracin D, Johnson BT, Zanna MP, eds. The Handbook of Attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2005:173–221. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Royston P, White IR. Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE): implementation in Stata. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(4):1–20. doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i04. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-3-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Bowker K, Orton S, Cooper S, et al. Views on and experiences of electronic cigarettes: a qualitative study of women who are pregnant or have recently given birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Cooper S, Orton S, Campbell KA, et al. Attitudes to e-cigarettes and cessation support for pregnant women from English stop smoking services: A mixed methods study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(1). doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Taylor T, Hajek P.. Smoking Cessation Services for Pregnant Women. London, UK: Health Development Agency; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Klerman LV, Spivey C, Raykovich KT. Smoking reduction activities in a federal program to reduce infant mortality among high risk women. Tob Control. 2000;9 (suppl 3):III51–55. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.suppl_3.iii51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Naughton F, Hopewell S, Sinclair L, McCaughan D, McKell J, Bauld L. Barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation in pregnancy and in the post-partum period: the health care professionals’ perspective. Br J Health Psychol. 2018;23(3):741–757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Flemming K, Graham H, McCaughan D, Angus K, Sinclair L, Bauld L. Health professionals’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to providing smoking cessation advice to women in pregnancy and during the post-partum period: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:290. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2961-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Coleman T, Chamberlain C, Davey MA, Cooper SE, Leonardi-Bee J. Pharmacological interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12:CD010078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010078.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kotz D, Fidler J, West R. Factors associated with the use of aids to cessation in English smokers. Addiction. 2009;104(8):1403–1410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Fish LJ, Peterson BL, Namenek Brouwer RJ, et al. Adherence to nicotine replacement therapy among pregnant smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(5):514–518. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Coleman T, Cooper S, Thornton JG, et al. A randomized trial of nicotine-replacement therapy patches in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):808–818. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Dempsey D, Jacob P III, Benowitz NL. Accelerated metabolism of nicotine and cotinine in pregnant smokers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;301(2):594–598. doi: 10.1124/jpet.301.2.594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Jordan TR, Dake JR, Price JH. Best practices for smoking cessation in pregnancy: do obstetrician/gynecologists use them in practice? J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006;15(4):400–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Okoli CTC, Greaves L, Bottorff JL, Marcellus LM. Health care providers’ engagement in smoking cessation with pregnant smokers. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010;39(1):64–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Abatemarco DJ, Steinberg MB, Delnevo CD. Midwives’ knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, and practice supports regarding tobacco dependence treatment. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52(5):451–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Owen L, Penn G.. Smoking and Pregnancy: A Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour 1992–1999. London, UK: Health Education Authority; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Naughton F, Eborall H, Sutton S. Dissonance and disengagement in pregnant smokers: a qualitative study. J Smoking Cessation. 2013;8(1):24–32. doi: 10.1017/jsc.2013.4. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Campbell KA, Bowker KA, Naughton F, Sloan M, Cooper S, Coleman T. Antenatal clinic and stop smoking services staff views on “Opt-Out” referrals for smoking cessation in pregnancy: a framework analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(10). doi: 10.3390/ijerph13101004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Sloan M, Campbell KA, Bowker K, et al. Pregnant women’s experiences and views on an “Opt-Out” referral pathway to specialist smoking cessation support: a qualitative evaluation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(5):900–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Althabe F, Aleman A, Berrueta M, et al. A multifaceted strategy to implement brief smoking cessation counseling during antenatal care in Argentina and Uruguay: a cluster randomized trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(5):1083–1092. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Naughton F, Cooper S, Foster K, et al. Large multi-centre pilot randomized controlled trial testing a low-cost, tailored, self-help smoking cessation text message intervention for pregnant smokers (MiQuit). Addiction. 2017;112(7):1238–1249. doi: 10.1111/add.13802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.