Public health measures, including physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitate telemental health, such as videoconferencing, to maintain continuity in clinical care for psychiatric outpatients. The use of technology in telemental health services is not only for curative purposes but also for assessment and monitoring as part of psychological first aid for the COVID-19 pandemic (Ransing et al., 2020; Kavoor et al., 2020). Telemental health is also a strategy to close the global mental health treatment gap, especially within low-and middle-income countries (Ransing et al., 2020; Arjadi et al., 2018; Das, 2020). Despite increased interest in telemental health, the pandemic created a sudden switch from offline to online modalities challenging clinicians to rapidly adapt to meet patients’ needs. For example, more than two-thirds of psychologists in a high-income country like the US have never conducted videoconferencing to deliver their therapeutic services (Glueckauf et al., 2018). This number is higher in low and middle-income countries in Asia, for example, about 85% of clinicians in Bangladesh have never provided telemental health services to their patients (Prodhan et al., 2017). Early career clinicians in Iran provided digital support groups through chatting apps (e.g., WhatsApp and Telegram) and social media (i.e., Facebook), and some of them did not use this digital remote support previously (Ransing et al., 2020). Neophyte online clinicians might not be aware of possible ethical and privacy concerns related to technology use in their practice (DeAngelis, 2020; Elhai and Hall, 2015; Lustgarten and Elhai, 2018). Additionally, telemental health services may not be regulated yet in health law, particularly in Asian countries (Medical Council of India, 2020).
There are five key ethical concerns clinicians need to be aware of before engaging in telemental health (Liem et al., 2020). First is to ensure confidentiality due to the complexities inherent in online treatment (Lustgarten and Elhai, 2018). For example, clinicians must ensure that their online communication has end-to-end encryption, to prevent access by a third party. One of the most widely used video conference providers was recently challenged on its stated privacy policy (Iyengar and Fung, 2020). Second, clinicians must have practical competence to deliver online interventions, including assisting patients when they face logistical issues.
Third, clinicians need to update their knowledge and comply with the newest regulations related to online interventions. For instance, clinicians in the US may use smartphones (in addition to desktop computers) in delivering their telehealth services during the COVID-19 public health emergency (DeAngelis, 2020). Also, the benefits for treatment should be weighed against the possibility that either clinicians or patients may not have adequate resources for conducting online interventions (i.e., a stable and secure internet connection). Fourth, similar with in-person interventions, clinicians are obligated to seek informed consent prior to intervention, and review risks and benefits of treatment. This is even more critical for telemental health, given the privacy concerns already mentioned. Fifth, clinicians must engage in contingency planning for emergency services (i.e., suicidal intent), first determining the patient’s physical location pre-emptively beforehand, in case the application used in delivering the intervention malfunctions. A brief checklist covers these five ethical standards for telemental health is provided in Table 1 and can complement the available mental health interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic (Ransing et al., 2020; Kavoor et al., 2020; Tandon, 2020).
Table 1.
Confidentiality |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Competency |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Compliance |
|
| |
Consent |
|
| |
| |
Contingency |
|
| |
| |
|
Note. * = may also applied for patients. Clinician should not rely on this table only and should seek more detail ethical standards from their government and professional organisation before providing telemental health services.
Telemental health is promising for use during the COVID-19 pandemic, including in Asian countries. Therefore, clinicians must maintain the highest ethical standards in order to deliver quality treatment that safeguards the welfare and best interests of their patients. Professional organisations and educational institutions should also include training in telemental health in the future.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Declaration of Competing Interest
We declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgement
None.
References
- Arjadi R., Nauta M.H., Scholte W.F., Hollon S.D., Chowdhary N., Suryani A.O., Uiterwaal C.S., Bockting C.L. Internet-based behavioural activation with lay counsellor support versus online minimal psychoeducation without support for treatment of depression: a randomised controlled trial in Indonesia. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(9):707–716. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30223-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Das N. Psychiatrist in post-COVID-19 era – are we prepared? Asian J. Psychiatry. 2020;51(online first):1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeAngelis T. 2020. What the COVID-19 Telehealth Waiver Means for Psychology Practitioners. Accessed from https://www.apaservices.org/practice/legal/technology/covid-19-telehealth-waiver on 13 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Elhai J.D., Hall B.J. How secure is mental health providers’ electronic patient communication? An empirical investigation. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pr. 2015;46(6):444. [Google Scholar]
- Glueckauf R.L., Maheu M.M., Drude K.P., Wells B.A., Wang Y., Gustafson D.J., Nelson E.L. Survey of psychologists’ telebehavioral health practices: technology use, ethical issues, and training needs. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pr. 2018;49(3):205. [Google Scholar]
- Iyengar R., Fung B. 2020. Zoom, the Video Conferencing App Everyone Is Using, Faces Questions Over Privacy. Accessed from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/01/tech/zoom-video-privacy-concerns/index.html on 14 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kavoor A.R., Chakravarthy K., John T. Remote consultations in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: preliminary experience in a regional Australian public acute mental health care setting. Asian J. Psychiatry. 2020;51(online first):1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liem A., Natari R.B., Jimmy Hall B.J. Digital health applications in mental health care for immigrants and refugees: A rapid review. Telemed. E-health. 2020;(online first) doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lustgarten S.D., Elhai J.D. Technology use in mental health practice and research: legal and ethical risks. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 2018;25(2) [Google Scholar]
- Medical Council of India . 2020. Telemedicine Practice Guidelines: Enabling Registered Medical Practitioners to Provide Healthcare Using Telemedicine. Mar. Accessed from https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/Telemedicine.pdf on 30 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Prodhan U.K., Rahman M.Z., Jahan I. A survey on the assessment of the present states and opportunities of telemedicine in Bangladesh. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inform. Security. 2017;15(1):1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Ransing R., Adiukwu F., Pereira-Sanchez V., Ramalho R., Orsolini L., Teixeira A.L.S., Gonzalez-Diaz J.M., da Costa M.P., Soler-Vidal J., Bytyçi D.G., El Hayek S. Mental health interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a conceptual framework by early career psychiatrists. Asian J. Psychiatry. 2020;51(online first):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102085. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tandon R. The COVID-19 pandemic personal reflections on editorial responsibility. Asian J. Psychiatry. 2020;50(online first):1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]