Skip to main content
IJU Case Reports logoLink to IJU Case Reports
. 2019 May 11;2(4):193–196. doi: 10.1002/iju5.12075

Case of renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma with high nuclear grade

Tomoya Hatayama 1, Yohei Sekino 1,, Hiroyuki Shikuma 1, Sakurako Mukai 1, Masayuki Muto 1, Shunsuke Miyamoto 1, Kosuke Sadahide 1, Kenichiro Fukuoka 1, Shinsuke Fuji 1, Keisuke Goto 1, Shunsuke Shinmei 1, Keisuke Hieda 1, Shogo Inoue 1, Tetsutaro Hayashi 1, Jun Teishima 1, Naoto Kuroda 2, Kazuhiro Sentani 3, Wataru Yasui 3, Akio Matsubara 1
PMCID: PMC7292185  PMID: 32743410

Abstract

Introduction

Renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma is a rare subtype of renal cell carcinoma newly added to the World Health Organization classification in 2004. Although it has been considered as a tumor with good prognosis, aggressive cases have recently been reported.

Case presentation

A 52‐year‐old man was diagnosed as having left renal cell carcinoma. Open radical left nephrectomy and left‐sided pelvic lymph nodes dissection were performed. Pathological diagnosis revealed a renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma with high nuclear grade and extra‐regional lymph nodes metastasis classified as pT3aN0M1. After nephrectomy, metastasis at second lumbar vertebra and lymph nodes recurrence were occurred.

Conclusion

This tumor with high nuclear grade may be potentially aggressive and carries a poor prognosis.

Keywords: high nuclear grade, renal cell carcinoma, renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma


Abbreviations & Acronyms

AMACR

α‐methyl acyl CoA racemase

CD

cluster of differentiation

CK

cytokeratin

CT

computed tomography

NA

not available

OS

overall survival

PET

positron emission tomography

RCC

renal cell carcinoma

RFS

recurrence‐free survival

RMTSCC

renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma

RT

radiation therapy

WHO

World Health Organization

Keynote message.

Some tumors of RMTSCC with high nuclear grade may have an aggressive course with poor prognosis. When diagnosing RMTSCC, clinicians should carefully observe the nuclear grade of the neoplastic cells and the area occupied by these cells with high nuclear grade.

Introduction

RMTSCC is a rare RCC that was newly classified in the WHO classification system in 2004.1 RMTSCC predominantly occurs in middle‐aged women (1:4 male‐to‐female ratio) and has been considered a tumor with good prognosis.2, 3 Histologically, this tumor is characterized by cuboidal cells with a tubular structure and spindle cells with cord‐like architecture and mucinous stroma.4, 5 However, some aggressive cases with a poor prognosis have been recently reported,6, 7 and in the 2016 WHO classification, the description of RMTSCC as a carcinoma with a good prognosis was eliminated.5 In this case report, we describe a case of RMTSCC with high nuclear grade that had metastasis at second lumbar vertebra and lymph nodes recurrence after nephrectomy.

Case presentation

A 52‐year‐old man was referred to our hospital because of a growing left renal tumor. A contrast‐enhanced CT scan revealed the presence of a 93‐mm tumor in the upper pole of the left kidney (Fig. 1a,b) with tumor thrombus observed in the left renal vein (Fig. 1c). The tumor was gradually enhanced from the corticomedullary phase to the excretory phase. Enlarged lymph nodes were present at the left external iliac lesion; they were extra‐regional lymph nodes and no other distant metastasis was observed (Fig. 1d). We diagnosed him as having left RCC classified as cT3aN0M1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CT imaging findings before nephrectomy. (a) Abdominal enhanced CT showed the size of the left renal tumor as 74 mm on axial imaging and (b) as 93 mm on coronal imaging. (c) Abdominal enhanced CT axial image of the left renal tumor and tumor thrombus in the left renal vein. (d) Abdominal enhanced CT of the 16‐mm lymph node at the left external iliac area.

Open radical nephrectomy and dissection of left‐sided pelvic lymph nodes were performed. The tumor and lymph nodes were examined macroscopically and microscopically. Macroscopically, a 80 × 80‐mm, gray–whitish and solid tumor with necrotic tissue was located in the upper pole of the resected left kidney. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of a tubular and partly papillary structure (Fig. 2a). The neoplastic cells were cuboidal with eosinophilic cytoplasm. The Fuhrman nuclear grading system is used to describe the RMTSCC.2, 7 This case was classified as Fuhrman nuclear grade 3 (Fig. 2b). The tumor was invaded into left renal vein, and metastatic lymph nodes were found at the left external iliac area (Fig. 2c). Fascicular growth with spindle cells and mucin stained by Alcian blue stain were found (Fig. 3a). Immunohistochemical findings showed the neoplastic cells to be diffusely positive for AMACR (Fig. 3b) and CK 7 (Fig. 3c). CD 10 was negative in the neoplastic cells (Fig. 3d). Although Ki‐67 and p53 were negative in the neoplastic cells with low nuclear grade, they were positive in the neoplastic cells with high nuclear grade (Fig. 3e,f). We subsequently diagnosed him as having left RMTSCC classified as pT3aN0M1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pathological findings of hematoxylin and eosin staining. (a) H&E staining of the renal tumor show the tubular and papillary structure and spindle component. (b) H&E staining of the renal tumor showed the high nuclear grade (Furman grade 3) and (c) the left external iliac lymph node showing mainly the spindle component.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pathological findings of immunohistochemical and special staining. (a) Alcian blue staining of the renal tumor showed stained mucinous stroma. (b) Immunohistochemical staining of the renal tumor showed that AMACR and (c) CK7 are diffusely positive, (d) CD10 is negative, (e) Ki‐67 was positive in the neoplastic cells with high nuclear grade and negative in the neoplastic cells with low nuclear grade, and (f) p‐53 was positive in the neoplastic cells with high nuclear grade and negative in the neoplastic cells with low nuclear grade.

Three months after nephrectomy, a PET‐CT scan showed metastasis at the second lumbar vertebra with a maximum standard uptake value of 5.7 (data not shown). Six months after nephrectomy, vertebrectomy was performed for metastasis at the second lumbar vertebra. The pathological findings showed metastasis of the RMTSCC to the second lumbar vertebra. Nine months after nephrectomy, another PET‐CT scan showed two 10‐mm lymph nodes at the left internal iliac lesion with a maximum standard uptake value of 5.1 (data not shown). These were not regional lymph nodes of RCC, but he was not suffering from other causative diseases such as prostate or rectal cancer. Therefore, we diagnosed these lymph nodes as metastasis of RMTSCC. We are planning on administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Discussion

To date, around 100 cases of RMTSCC have been reported. Most of them have described RMTSCC with low nuclear grade and a favorable prognosis.2 However, several recent reports have shown recurrence or metastasis in RMTSCC with high nuclear grade.7, 8 To our knowledge, around 20 cases of recurrence after nephrectomy in RMTSCC have been reported. Among them, the detailed clinical course and prognosis after nephrectomy have been reported in 10 cases,6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 which are summarized in Table 1. The median patient age was 67.5 (range 32–82) years. The 10 cases comprised eight male and two female patients. Of note, histological findings revealed that seven patients had neoplastic cells with high nuclear grade. After recurrence, three patients were treated with sunitinib, one with pazopanib and RT, one underwent resection of the recurrent metastatic tumor, two underwent chemotherapy, and details of treatment were not described in three patients. We performed Kaplan–Meier survival analysis in the seven cases of RMTSCC with high nuclear grade. The median RFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 1.0–28 months), and the median OS was 9.0 months (95% CI 1.0–48 months). One patient with good progress after resection of her recurrent metastatic tumor was reported who had been alive for 23 years after the initial surgery.15 However, it should be noted that this patient had RMTSCC with low nuclear grade. Collectively, these findings indicate that the prognosis of RMTSCC with high nuclear grade is unfavorable.

Table 1.

Clinical and pathological details of renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma cases with recurrence after nephrectomy

Age Sex R/L cT N M pT Nuclear grade RFS (months) OS (months) Additional treatment Reference
1 49 M RL 1a 0 0 1a Low 24 29 Pazopanib + RT 9
2 82 M R 1a 1 0 1a High 5 6 Sunitinib 10
3 71 M R 1a 0 0 1a High 1 24 Sunitinib, temsirolimus, axitinib 7
4 64 M R 2a NA NA 1b High 6 9 Chemotherapy 7
5 76 M R 1a NA NA 1a High NA 48 Sunitinib 11
6 71 M L 1a 0 0 1a Low 9 NA NA 12
7 64 M L 2b 0 0 2b High NA 8 NA 13
8 75 M NA NA NA NA NA High NA 1 Chemotherapy 6
9 57 F R 1b 0 0 1b High 28 48 NA 14
10 32 F R 1b 0 0 1b Low 96 NA Operation 15

There is no currently recommended systemic therapy for recurrence or metastasis of RMTSCC. In our investigation, one case was reported with a good response to sunitinib in RMTSCC with low nuclear grade.16 In contrast, other RMTSCCs with high nuclear grade did not respond to chemotherapy that included sunitinib, axitinib, and temsirolimus. As the second‐line therapy, one paper has reported about efficacy of nivolumab in non‐clear cell RCC patients including one case of RMTSCC.17 CT showed a stable tumor at 6 months after nivolumab treatment, but the nivolumab was stopped at 8 months because of tumor progression. In the future, we will report the detail of clinical course after recurrence.

Conclusion

We presented a case of RMTSCC with high nuclear grade. After nephrectomy, metastasis at second lumbar vertebra and lymph nodes recurrence occurred. The prognosis of RMTSCC with high nuclear grade is considered to be unfavorable. Further studies with a large number of cases are required to compile evidence on the follow‐up course and therapeutic algorithm in RMTSCC. Additionally, biomarkers to predict the prognosis of RMTSCC are required because recurrence and metastasis occurred even in RMTSCC with low nuclear grade. When diagnosing RMTSCC, clinicians should carefully observe the nuclear grade of the neoplastic cells and the area occupied by these cells with high nuclear grade.

Ethics

We obtained written informed consent from the subject.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

We thank Mr Shinichi Norimura for his excellent technical assistance.

References

  • 1. Lopez‐Beltran A, Scarpelli M, Montironi R, Kirkali Z. 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. Eur. Urol. 2006; 49: 798–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wu XR, Chen YH, Sha JJ et al Renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma: a report of 8 cases and review of the literature. Diagn. Pathol. 2013; 8: 206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Eble JN et al The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) vancouver classification of renal neoplasia. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2013; 37: 1469–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hes O, Hora M, Perez‐Montiel DM et al Spindle and cuboidal renal cell carcinoma, a tumour having frequent association with nephrolithiasis: report of 11 cases including a case with hybrid conventional renal cell carcinoma/spindle and cuboidal renal cell carcinoma components. Histopathology 2002; 41: 549–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Ulbright TM. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs‐part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur. Urol. 2016; 70: 93–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bulimbasic S, Ljubanovic D, Sima R et al Aggressive high‐grade mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2009; 40: 906–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Uchida S, Suzuki K, Uno M et al Mucin‐poor and aggressive mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney: two case reports. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2017; 7: 777–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zhao M, He XL, Teng XD. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell renal cell carcinoma: a review of clinicopathologic aspects. Diagn. Pathol. 2015; 10: 168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sokolakis I, Kalogirou C, Frey L et al Mucin‐poor mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney presented with multiple metastases two years after nephrectomy: an atypical behaviour of a rare, indolent tumour. Case Rep. Urol. 2017; 2017: 6597592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sakatani T, Okumura Y, Kuroda N et al Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma with a high nuclear grade and micropapillary pattern: a case report. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2017; 7: 976–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Pivovarcikova K, Peckova K, Martinek P et al “Mucin”‐secreting papillary renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic analysis of seven cases. Virchows Arch. 2016; 469: 71–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Yan L, Huang B, Xue L, Lu Q, Wen J, Wang W. Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound characterization of renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma: report of two cases. J. Clin. Ultrasound 2015; 43: 55–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Arafah M, Zaidi SN. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney with sarcomatoid transformation. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2013; 24: 557–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kuroda N, Hes O, Michal M et al Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma with Fuhrman nuclear grade 3: a histological, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural and FISH study. Histol. Histopathol. 2008; 23: 1517–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rakozy C, Schmahl GE, Bogner S, Storkel S. Low‐grade tubular‐mucinous renal neoplasms: morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features. Mod. Pathol. 2002; 15: 1162–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Larkin J, Fisher R, Pickering L et al Metastatic mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney responding to sunitinib. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010; 28: e539–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Koshkin VS, Barata PC, Zhang T et al Clinical activity of nivolumab in patients with non‐clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J. Immunother. Cancer 2018; 6: 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from IJU Case Reports are provided here courtesy of John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association

RESOURCES