Abstract
Background:
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease with regressive episodic symptoms. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of asthma ever (lifetime prevalence of asthma) and the associated factors among newly entered students in public universities in Iran.
Methods:
This population-based cross-sectional study was part of the “Mental and Physical Health Assessment of University Students in Iran.” The target population included all newly admitted students (N = 151,671) in 74 public universities in 28 provinces (out of the 31 provinces) in Iran. STATA version 12 was used for calculating the descriptive statistics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were employed to identify relationships between asthma and socioeconomic variables. The level of significance was set at 95% confidence interval.
Results:
Of a total of 79,277 participants, 55.23% (n = 43,785) and 44.77% (n = 35,492) were female and male, respectively. The prevalence of ever asthma among studied student was 1.89%. Of all the participants with asthma, 88.43% (85.49%–90.84%) were nonsmokers. More than 20% of the subjects were physically inactive. The respondents who revealed smoking >10 cigarettes/week were about 1.22 (1.036–1.437) times more likely to suffer from asthma disease (0.017), as compared with those who were not smoking.
Conclusions:
Our study provides valuable information about the prevalence of asthma ever symptoms among university students in Iran. In fact, the results of this study can fill information gaps concerning the affected groups in Iran, and even worldwide.
Keywords: Asthma, Iran, prevalence, students
Introduction
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease[1] with regressive episodic symptoms (e.g., cough, wheezing, chest tightness, and shortness of breath).[2] It has affected about 5% of the total world's population.[3] An international comparison of self-reported asthma prevalence among children in high-income countries indicated a rising trend in asthma prevalence since 1955 to 2010.[4] Furthermore, other studies has demonstrated the increasing prevalence of asthma in developed and developing countries in recent years.[5] Although the causes of asthma are not fully known yet,[6] the raising prevalence is seemingly related to changes in environmental factors, lifestyle, and/or socioeconomic status.[7] The studies concluded that smoking, obesity, and having comorbidity are risk factors for asthma.[8,9] Moreover, it is indicated that sex, age, and race can be potential predictors for prevalence of asthma.[10,11]
In the literature, asthma is defined in several ways including current asthma, physician-diagnosed asthma, and exercise-induced asthma. Another common definition is asthma ever which means a state characterized by a history of wheezing and dyspnea attack ever in the lifetime.[12,13]
Several studies had tried to calculate asthma prevalence in Iran.[13,14] However, the prevalence of asthma among the youth (20 to 30 years old) remains unclear. On the other hand, a large proportion of the young adults are university students in Iran (>30% of Iranian population in the mentioned age-group).[15] Although the number of student population is enormous, so far there has been no comprehensive study on health (particularly asthma prevalence) and mental status of this population group. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of asthma ever (lifetime prevalence of asthma) and the associated factors among newly entered students in public universities in Iran.
Methods
This population-based cross-sectional study was part of the “Mental and Physical Health Assessment of University Students in Iran (MEPHASOUS-Iran).” The profile of the study including the methodological details is published elsewhere. In brief, to evaluate universities' health initiatives, the Counseling and Health Organization of the Ministry of Science and Technology (CHOMST) has designed “Mental and Physical Health Assessment of University Students in Iran” in 2012–2013 academic year. The assessment aimed to understand the present health issues and behaviors among university students. The detail of the program assessment was announced to the health centers of the public universities. All public universities from various geographical regions that had a health center participated in the program. During the registration phase, the students received detailed information regarding the health program by the health centers' medical staff. Dates and times of screening sessions were announced on the website. The students were also informed by E-mail and SMS.[16]
Study population
In this study, the target population included all newly admitted students (N = 151,671) in 74 public universities with a health center in 28 provinces (out of the 31 provinces) in Iran. In order to maintain consistency in data gathering in terms of sex- and age-group, we carried out a population-based stratification of homogeneous subgroups including four age-groups and two sexes. Eligibility criteria included all newly students who were entered in university and they were 18- to 29-year olds. Overall, of all eligible students included in the study, we collected data on 84,298 (55% of total) participants aged 18–29 year. In addition, 79,277 individuals completed information on demographic characteristic and included in the analysis. The details on sampling frame, sampling method, etc., are presented elsewhere.[16]
Data collection
We employed a questionnaire as a tool to collect demographic characteristic including age and gender, body mass index (BMI) status, mental and physical health, and dietary habits data. Physical health was categorized into physical activity, sleep pattern, and sleep duration, whereas dietary habits was categorized to fruit consumption, vegetable consumption, and carbonated beverages consumption. To evaluate physical activity, the question was “During the week, how many days do you have physical activity for at least 30 minutes?” The categories of this question were as follows: not at all, 1–2 times/week, 3–4 times/week, and every day; more than 1–2 times/week as active and those who did not at all as inactive. The other question was “How much do you eat vegetables, fruits and drinks during the week?”?
Statistical analysis
Survey analysis was performed to apply the correction weight to analyses. Univariate logistic regression model was utilized to assess differences in continuous variables associated with asthma. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression model was utilized to identify relationships between asthma and other variables. In this model, we made further adjustment for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, junk food consumption, physical activity, fruit consumption, vegetable consumption, carbonate beverage, sleep duration reverse, diabetes mellitus (DM), and smoking family. The level of significance was set at 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or at a P value equal to 5%. All analyses were carried out using STATA software version 14.0 (College Station, TX, USA).
Results
The prevalence of asthma among studied student was 1.89% (2.2% in male and 1.6% in female). Of the total 79,277 contributors, 55.23% (n = 43,785) and 44.77% (n = 35,492) were female and male, respectively. More than half of the student, i.e., 55.56% (53.76–57.33; n = 44,046) had an ideal body weight [Table 1].
Table 1.
Variables | Subject with Asthma | Nonasthmatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Smoking | >10 cigarette/week | 5.90 (3.79-9.06) | 4.98 (2.97-8.24) |
≤10 cigarette/week | 1.11 (0.79-1.57) | 0.94 (0.87-1.02) | |
Occasionally/week | 4.54 (3.84-5.38) | 2.86 (2.66-3.07) | |
No at all | 88.43 (85.49-90.84) | 91.20 (88.40-93.38) | |
Gender | Male | 52.56 (50.28-54.83) | 44.62 (43.26-45.99) |
Female | 47.44 (45.17-49.72) | 55.37 (54.01-56.74) | |
BMI | Lean | 13.51 (12.33-14.79) | 17.88 (17.43-18.34) |
Ideal weight | 55.56 (53.76-57.33) | 59.95 (59.57-60.33) | |
Over weight | 22.91 (21.44-24.45) | 17.50 (17.14-17.86) | |
Obese | 8.01 (7.04-9.09) | 4.66 (4.47-4.85) | |
Smoking family | None smoker | 79.23 (77.76-80.63) | 88.70 (88.45-88.94) |
Smoker | 20.76 (19.37-22.24) | 11.29 (11.06-11.54) | |
Physical activity | Not at all | 20.44 (19.01-21.96) | 16.01 (15.64-16.38) |
1-2 times/week | 43.44 (41.54-45.36) | 43.99 (43.49-44.49) | |
3-4 times/week | 24.26 (22.71-25.88) | 27.98 (27.64-28.33) | |
Everyday | 11.86 (10.56-13.28) | 12.02 (11.63-12.43) | |
Sleep duration | >10 h | 3.30 (2.70-4.03) | 1.98 (1.85-2.12) |
8-10 h | 31.46 (29.61-33.38) | 34.30 (33.69-34.91) | |
6-8 h | 56.81 (54.81-58.79) | 58.17 (57.53-58.81) | |
<6 h | 8.42 (7.53-9.39) | 5.55 (5.36-5.74) | |
Fruit consumption | Not at all | 7.03 (6.14-8.03) | 3.85 (3.60-4.11) |
<200 g | 37.02 (34.93-39.17) | 34.77 (33.68-35.89) | |
200-500 g | 47.11 (44.90-49.34) | 51.32 (50.22-52.42) | |
>500 g | 8.82 (7.91-9.84) | 10.06 (9.80-10.32) | |
Vegetable consumption | Not at all | 20.25 (18.74-21.86) | 15.01 (14.34-15.70) |
Once/week | 37.57 (35.69-39.50) | 35.76 (35.26-36.27) | |
2-3 times/week | 30.03 (28.31-31.80) | 35.79 (35.15-36.45) | |
Often times (most the days) | 12.14 (10.93-13.47) | 13.43 (12.99-13.88) | |
Cereals consumption | Everyday | 1.95 (1.47-2.58) | 1.70 (1.61-1.79) |
2-3 times/week | 18.78 (17.35-20.28) | 21.69 (21.13-22.27) | |
Once/week | 46.31 (44.47-48.16) | 48.14 (47.77-48.51) | |
Not at all | 32.97 (31.30-34.67) | 28.47 (27.83-29.11) | |
Carbonated beverages and juice consumption | Everyday | 9.83 (8.54-11.29) | 6.02 (5.71-6.35) |
2-3 times/week | 37.96 (36.29-39.67) | 35.81 (35.20-36.41) | |
Once/week | 52.20 (50.18-54.20) | 58.17 (57.31-59.03) |
BMI=Body mass index
Personal lifestyle
Of all the participants with asthma, 88.43% (85.49%–90.84%) were nonsmoker and 79.23% (77.76%–80.63%) had no exposure for passive smoking. Less than half of the participants were consuming 200–500 g fruits per day. More than 56% of the students declared that they slept for about 6–8 h a day. More than 20% of respondents were physically inactive.
Factors associated with asthma disease
According to the results of univariate logistic regression model, self-reported asthma was not associated with age [Table 2], but according to the results of multivariable logistic regression model, asthma associated with sex, BMI, sleep duration, current smoking status, DM, physical activity, fruit consumption, vegetable consumption, carbonated beverages, and exposure of secondhand smoking [Table 3].
Table 2.
Variables | Odds ratio | CI 95% odds ratio | P |
---|---|---|---|
Age (each one year increased) | 0.995 | 0.985-1.005 | 0.383 |
Sex (female/male) | 0.727 | 0.675-0.782 | <0.001 |
Body mass index (each one unit increase) | 1.057 | 1.048-1.066 | <0.001 |
Smoking (smoker/nonsmoker) | 1.356 | 1.188-1.547 | <0.001 |
Junk food consumption | |||
No use at all | Reference | ||
2-3 days | 0.646 | 0.484-0.860 | 0.003 |
1 day or not at all | 0.570 | 0.435-0.748 | <0.001 |
Physical activity | 0.741 | 0.674-0.814 | <0.001 |
Fruit consumption | |||
No use at all | Reference | ||
<200 g/day | 0.582 | 0.505-0.671 | <0.001 |
≥200 g/day | 0.498 | 0.432-0.575 | <0.001 |
Vegetable consumption | |||
No use at all | 0.695 | 0.432-0.764 | <0.001 |
Carbonated beverage | |||
No use at all | Reference | ||
2-3 days/week | 1.181 | 1.098-1.271 | <0.001 |
All days | 1.820 | 1.564-2.118 | <0.001 |
Each hour decreased sleep duration reverse | 1.564 | 1.380-1.772 | <0.001 |
Diabetic/non diabetic | 2.411 | 1.588-3.662 | <0.001 |
Smoking in family/no smoker in family | 2.057 | 1.885-2.245 | <0.001 |
CI=Confidence interval
Table 3.
Variables | Odds ratio | CI 95% odds ratio | P |
---|---|---|---|
Age (each one year increased) | 0.993 | 0.983-1.003 | 0.148 |
Sex (female/male) | 0.847 | 0.782-0.918 | <0.001 |
Body mass index (each one unit increase) | 1.056 | 1.047-1.065 | <0.001 |
Smoking (smoker/nonsmoker) | 1.130 | 1.006-1.270 | 0.039 |
Junk food consumption | |||
No use at all | Reference | ||
2-3 days | 0.851 | 0.627-1.157 | 0.298 |
1 day or not at all | 0.848 | 0.631-1.140 | 0.271 |
Physical activity | 0.787 | 0.711-0.871 | <0.001 |
Fruit consumption | |||
No use at all | Reference | ||
<200 g/day | 0.713 | 0.610-0.833 | <0.001 |
≥200 g/day | 0.671 | 0.571-0.788 | <0.001 |
Vegetable consumption | |||
No use at all | 0.826 | 0.745-0.916 | <0.001 |
Carbonated beverage | |||
No use at all | Reference | ||
2-3 days/week | 1.151 | 1.061-1.248 | 0.001 |
All days | 1.588 | 1.327-1.900 | <0.001 |
Each hour decreased sleep duration reverse | 1.275 | 1.115-1.459 | 0.001 |
Diabetic/nondiabetic | 2.098 | 1.338-3.289 | 0.002 |
Smoking in family/no smoker in family | 1.846 | 1.688-2.018 | <0.001 |
CI=Confidence interval
The respondents who revealed smoking were about 1.130 times more likely to suffer from asthma disease, as compared with those who were not smoking (OR = 1.130; 95% CI = 1.006–1.270).
Of those who exposed to secondhand smoking, 2.057 times were likely to suffer from asthma, as compared with those who were not exposed to secondhand smoking (OR = 2.057; 95% CI = 1.885–2.245).
The participants who did not consume carbonated beverage were less likely (less than half) to suffer from asthma, as compared with those who regularly consumed carbonated beverage (OR = 1.588; 95% CI = 1.327–1.900).
Discussion
In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of asthma among university students in Iran, and we realized that sex, BMI, sleep duration, smoking status, DM, physical activity, fruit consumption, vegetable consumption, carbonated beverages, and having a smoker family member had a relationship with the incidence of asthma. The survey results suggested that asthma symptoms among students aged 18–39 years exacerbated with aging. These results are consistent with the findings of a previous study.[17] It seems that the prevalence of asthma was higher among female than male students, whereas other study showed that the mortality of asthma was lower among female than male.[18] Thus, our findings are in line with some other studies.[19]
The results of the present study showed that both smoker and nonsmoker students, who lived with a smoker family member, were significantly at higher risk of asthma than those without a smoker family member. Several studies indicated the significant relationship between asthma prevalence and smoking status.[20,21] The respondents who smoked every day were more significantly at risk of asthma.
Furthermore, the participants who consumed junk foods more than three times a week were more at risk of asthma. Other studies suggest that high intake of deep-fried foods tends to be positively associated with increased risk of asthma among teenagers.[22]
The relationship between asthma and overweight/obesity has been controversial so far[23]; however, the higher prevalence of asthma among obese subjects might suggest that overweight and obesity could be among the asthma risk factors. This finding is not in line with the results of other studies. They observed no significant relationship between asthma and overweight among school-aged children.[24] However, consistent with our study, Gilliland et al. have shown a significant relationship between the incidence of physician-diagnosed asthma and obesity, as asthma prevalence is significantly higher among overweight and obese people, as compared with those with an ideal weight.[25] Similarly, Ziaei Kajbaf et al. have found a strong relationships between asthma symptoms and both overweight and obesity among school-aged children in both sexes.[26]
The other factors investigated as potential covariates were fruit and vegetable consumption. The results of this study demonstrated that vegetable and fruit consumption was negatively associated with the prevalence of asthma. According to many scholars, fruit and vegetable consumption are among protective factors against asthma symptoms.[27] It could be due to the fact that fruit and vegetable have several types of vitamin and minerals, which are useful for lung function.[28] However, some other studies did not find any relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and asthma prevalence.[29]
Another factor that was associated with asthma was carbonated beverage usage. This result showed that asthma among every day carbonated beverage consumer was more prevalent than those has not consumed. Park et al. found that students, who drank steadily soda three or more times per day, 64% more likely to develop asthma compared with who never consumed soda.[30] This relationship could be due to high absorbance of sodium benzoate.[31] Wickens et al. conducted a study to examine the hypothesis that asthma prevalence is influenced by fast food. They showed that there is no relationship between asthma prevalence and fast food.[32]
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive assessment that investigated the relationship between asthma prevalence and its associated factors among university students (a young population group) at subnational, national, and even international level. So, the results of this study can address and fill a gap in the literature through presenting some data and findings on asthma prevalence and epidemiology of the disease among the large group of students in Iran. Furthermore, the results can help authorities, policy makers, and all stockholders to screen, plan, and assess essential medical services for students to reduce the prevalence of asthma among the people who are entering universities.
In this study, a number of limitations need to be acknowledged. The asthma in this study was self-reported and this may lead to some inaccuracies in classification. Furthermore, there is concern that the data of this study were collected about 6 years ago and the prevalence of asthma might have changed so far.
Conclusions
We found that multiple factors had a significant relationship with the prevalence of asthma among students, such as sex, high BMI, and some health condition including DM. Moreover, some life-style factors including physical activity, smoking status, and vegetable and fruit consumption were predictors to asthma. Our study provides valuable information about the prevalence of asthma symptoms among university students in Iran. In fact, the results of this study can fill information gaps concerning this age group in Iran.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Masoli M, Fabian D, Holt S, Beasley R. The global burden of asthma: Executive summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee report. Allergy. 2004;59:469–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.National Institutes of Health. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma Publication No 97-4051. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fauci AS. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Publishing Division; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Asher MI, Ellwood P. The global asthma report 2014. 2014 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burr M, Butland B, King S, Vaughan-Williams E. Changes in asthma prevalence: Two surveys 15 years apart. Arch Dis Child. 1989;64:1452–6. doi: 10.1136/adc.64.10.1452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zahran HS, Bailey C. Factors associated with asthma prevalence among racial and ethnic groups-United States, 2009-2010 behavioral risk factor surveillance system. J Asthma. 2013;50:583–9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.794238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stewart AW, Mitchell EA, Pearce N, Strachan DP, Weiland SK. The relationship of per capita gross national product to the prevalence of symptoms of asthma and other atopic diseases in children (ISAAC) Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:173–9. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gold D, Wright R. Population disparities in asthma. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:89–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kozyrskyj AL, O’neil JD. The social construction of childhood asthma: Changing explanations of the relationship between socioeconomic status and asthma. Critical Public Health. 1999;9:197–210. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shimizu Y, Dobashi K, Kusano M, Mori M. Different gastoroesophageal reflux symptoms of middle-aged to elderly asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2012;50:169–75. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.11-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pearlman AN, Chandra RK, Chang D, Conley DB, Peters AT, Grammer LC, et al. Relationships between severity of chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis, asthma, and atopy. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23:145–8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Varmaghani M, Rashidian A, Kebriaeezadeh A, Moradi-Lakeh M, Moin M, Ghasemian A, et al. National and sub-national prevalence, trend, and burden of asthma in Iran from 1990 to 2013; the study protocol. Arch Iran Med. 2014;17:804–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Varmaghani M, Farzadfar F, Sharifi F, Rashidain A, Moin M, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. Prevalence of asthma, COPD, and chronic bronchitis in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2016;15:93–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Boskabady MH, Kolahdoz GH. Prevalence of asthma symptoms among the adult population in the city of Mashhad (north-east of Iran) Respirology. 2002;7:267–72. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2002.00398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Iran. sco. [Last accesses on 2019 Apr 04]. Available from: https://www.amar.org.ir/english .
- 16.Mansouri M, Sharifi F, Varmaghani M, Yaghubi H, Tabrizi YM, Raznahan M, et al. Iranian university students lifestyle and health status survey: Study profile. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017;16:48. doi: 10.1186/s40200-017-0329-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Anandan C, Nurmatov U, Van Schayck O, Sheikh A. Is the prevalence of asthma declining? Systematic review of epidemiological studies. Allergy. 2010;65:152–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Varmaghani M, Kebriaeezadeh A, Sharifi F, Sheidaei A, Rashidian A, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. Death-specific rate due to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Iran. Clin Respir J. 2018;12:2075–83. doi: 10.1111/crj.12776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Greenblatt R, Mansour O, Zhao E, Ross M, Himes BE. Gender-specific determinants of asthma among US adults. Asthma Res Pract. 2017;3:2. doi: 10.1186/s40733-017-0030-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sturm JJ, Yeatts K, Loomis D. Effects of tobacco smoke exposure on asthma prevalence and medical care use in North Carolina middle school children. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:308–13. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Frank P, Morris J, Hazell M, Linehan M, Frank T. Smoking, respiratory symptoms and likely asthma in young people: Evidence from postal questionnaire surveys in the Wythenshawe Community Asthma Project (WYCAP) BMC Pulm Med. 2006;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-6-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Huang SL, Lin KC, Pan WH. Dietary factors associated with physician-diagnosed asthma and allergic rhinitis in teenagers: Analyses of the first Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31:259–64. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2001.00938.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Garcia-Marcos L, Canflanca IM, Garrido JB, Varela AL-S, Garcia-Hernandez G, Grima FG, et al. Relationship of asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis with obesity, exercise and Mediterranean diet in Spanish schoolchildren. Thorax. 2007;62:503–8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.060020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Willeboordse M, van de Kant KD, van der Velden CA, van Schayck CP, Dompeling E. Associations between asthma, overweight and physical activity in children: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:919. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3600-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gilliland FD, Berhane K, Islam T, McConnell R, Gauderman WJ, Gilliland SS, et al. Obesity and the risk of newly diagnosed asthma in school-age children. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:406–15. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kajbaf TZ, Asar S, Alipoor MR. Relationship between obesity and asthma symptoms among children in Ahvaz, Iran: A cross sectional study. Ital J Pediatr. 2011;37:1. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-37-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Garcia-Larsen V, Arthur R, Potts JF, Howarth PH, Ahlström M, Haahtela T, et al. Is fruit and vegetable intake associated with asthma or chronic rhino-sinusitis in European adults? Results from the global allergy and asthma network of excellence (GA 2 LEN) survey. Clin Transl Allergy. 2017;7:3. doi: 10.1186/s13601-016-0140-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pastorino AC, Rimazza RD, Leone C, Castro APM, Sole D, Jacob CM. Risk factors for asthma in adolescents in a large urban region of Brazil. J Asthma. 2006;43:695–700. doi: 10.1080/02770900600925544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Woods RK, Walters EH, Raven JM, Wolfe R, Ireland PD, Thien FC, et al. Food and nutrient intakes and asthma risk in young adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:414–21. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Park S, Blanck HM, Sherry B, Jones SE, Pan L. Regular-soda intake independent of weight status is associated with asthma among US high school students. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:106–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.DeChristopher L, Uribarri J, Tucker K. The link between soda intake and asthma: Science points to the high-fructose corn syrup, not the preservatives: a commentary. Nutr Diabetes. 2016;6:e234. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2016.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wickens K, Barry D, Friezema A, Rhodius R, Bone N, Purdie G, et al. Fast foods–are they a risk factor for asthma? Allergy. 2005;60:1537–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00945.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]