Abstract
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) exhibit highly aggressive and metastatic features and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) expression varies among non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), and the mechanisms that support abnormal AhR expression in CSCs remain elusive. Here, we identified ubiquitin carboxyl terminal hydrolase L3 (UCHL3), a DUB enzyme in the UCH protease family, as a bona fide deubiquitylase of the AhR in NSCLC. UCHL3 was shown to interact with, deubiquitylate, and stabilize AhR in a manner dependent on its deubiquitylation activity. Moreover, we showed that UCHL3 promotes the stem-like characteristics and potent tumorigenic capacity of NSCLC cells. UCHL3 increased AhR stability and the binding of AhR to the promoter regions of the “stemness” genes ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2), KLF4, and c-Myc. Depletion of UCHL3 markedly downregulated the “stemness” genes ABCG2, KLF4, and c-Myc, leading to the loss of self-renewal and tumorigenesis in NSCLCs. Furthermore, the UCHL3 inhibitor TCID induced AhR degradation and exhibited significantly attenuated efficacy in NSCLC cells with stem cell-like properties. Additionally, UCHL3 was shown to indicate poor prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. In general, our results reveal that the UCHL3 deubiquitylase is pivotal for AhR protein stability and a potential target for NSCLC-targeted therapy.
Subject terms: Cancer stem cells, Lung cancer
Introduction
Proteins are decorated with a diverse array of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) that regulate their spatial and temporal functions. Protein ubiquitination is a posttranslational modification that regulates all kinds of biological processes by influencing the stabilization, localization and function of substrate proteins.1 Ubiquitination, a highly regulated posttranslational protein modification,2 is reversible by reactions catalyzed by several distinct families of deubiquitylases.3 Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), which can remove ubiquitin from protein substrates, protect proteins from degradation, following which free ubiquitin is released to participate in the cyclic ubiquitination reaction. Nevertheless, in some cases, DUBs can also promote substrate degradation.4,5 The balance between ubiquitination and deubiquitination is indispensable for all kinds of biological processes.6,7
The DUB enzymes identified are divided into five subfamilies,8–11 one of which is the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH) family. Four UCH family members have been identified: UCHL1, UCHL3, UCH37 and BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1),12–14 and all UCH enzymes possess a conserved catalytic domain (UCH domain) composed of 230 amino acids.7 As the homology between UCHL3 and UCHL1 is as high as 53%, they are the closest family members, but UCHL3 and UCHL1 have very different biochemical characteristics.15
Because of its deneddylation activity, UCHL3 appears to be unique in the UCH family.16 Some research has suggested that UCHL3 plays a role in tumorigenesis and that UCHL3 expression is upregulated in breast cancer and cervical cancer tissues.17,18 However, the specific mechanism and role of UCHL3 in tumorigenesis have not been clarified.
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) belongs to the basic helix-loop/PER-ARNT-SIM (bHLH-PAS) transcription factor family, the members of which require ligand activation. Its classical ligand, TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin), is widespread in industrial environmental pollutants (in the atmosphere, food and water sources) and associated with severe hepatotoxicity and skin toxicity.19,20 AhR expression in lung cancer is complicated. Some reports indicate that AhR is downregulated in lung cancer,21 whereas others report that AhR is overexpressed.22,23 AhR in the cytoplasm is in a resting state, and after its activation, AhR binds its nuclear transporter, ARNT, to form an AhR-ARNT heterodimer that enters the nucleus, where it initiates the transcription of its target genes.20 We recently found that benzopyrene (BaP) promotes nuclear transport by activating AhR, leading to malignant transformation of NSCLC.24 Our previous studies also found that AhR activates downstream target genes in a ligand-independent manner.25 In addition, activation of the AhR signaling pathway was shown to be related to radiation resistance and the stem-like characteristics of cancer cells, whereas AhR knockout reduced the stem-like phenotype of cancer cells.26
Cancer stem cells (CSCs), a small cell population in cancer tissues with stem cell characteristics, have the ability to undergo self-renewal and the potential for nondirectional differentiation; they can differentiate into different types of cancer cells with different degrees of differentiation.27,28 Stem cell characteristics have become a target of cancer therapy.27,29–32 Researchers have identified markers of cancer stem cells, such as CD44, CD133, ATP binding cassette transporter G2 (ABCG2), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1), KLF4, Oct4, c-Myc, and Nanog,33–36 which are useful to diagnose the degree of CSC malignancy.
Among all cancers, lung cancer accounts for the most deaths, and lung cancer is the most common cancer in China and the world.37 Lung cancer can be divided into small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and NSCLC can be subdivided into adenocarcinomas (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), which account for 80–85% of all lung cancer cases.38
In this study, we found that UCHL3 is a contributing factor to cancer stem-like properties that promotes tumorigenesis by stabilizing AhR protein degradation.
Results
UCHL3 is upregulated in NSCLC and associated with poor prognosis in lung ADC
To clarify the role of UCHL3 in lung cancer, we used Western blotting to detect the expression of UCHL3 in 20 pairs of NSCLC tissues and paracancerous normal tissues. Upregulation of UCHL3 was observed in both ADC and SCC (Fig. 1a). In addition, TCGA database analysis showed that UCHL3 mRNA levels were upregulated in both ADC and SCC (Fig. 1b). We carried out immunohistochemical analysis of tissue samples obtained from lung cancer patients to further confirm the expression level of UCHL3 in lung cancer. The UCHL3 protein was detected in both lung cancer tissues and paracancerous normal tissues, and its expression was significantly elevated in lung ADC and SCC (Fig. 1c). Moreover, we found that immunohistochemical scores (IHSs) for UCHL3 in lung ADC and SCC tissues were higher than those in paracancerous normal tissues (Fig. 1d). We used Kaplan–Meier analysis to evaluate the relationship between the expression level of UCHL3 and the survival rate of NSCLC patients. The results indicated that high expression of UCHL3 corresponded with a low survival rate (Fig. 1e). In addition, we performed Kaplan–Meier analysis in other cancer types, breast cancer (BRCA), kidney cancer (KIRC) and liver cancer (LIHC), which showed that UCHL3 levels were upregulated in these cancers (Supplementary Fig. S1a). In addition, high UCHL3 levels were associated with poor overall survival (Supplementary Fig. S1b). We observed that both AhR and UCHL3 protein levels were increased in lung cancer tissues compared with normal tissues, and a positive correlation between AhR and UCHL3 protein levels was observed (Supplementary Fig. S1c). Our results show that UCHL3 in the cytoplasm may play a biological role and that its expression may be increased in human cancers.
Overexpression of UCHL3 promotes cell growth, colony formation, tumor formation, and tumor stem-like properties
According to Kaplan–Meier analysis, compared with its impact on the clinical prognosis of SCC patients (P = 0.6641), the expression of UCHL3 had a greater impact on the clinical prognosis of ADC patients (P = 0.0157). Therefore, ADC cell lines were selected as research models. Then, we determined the UCHL3 expression levels in a group of lung ADC cell lines (Supplementary Fig. S1d). UCHL3 exhibited low expression levels in A549 and H1299 cell lines and high expression levels in the H358 cell line. Next, using lentivirus, UCHL3 was overexpressed in A549 and H1299 cells and knocked down in H358 cells. We used western blotting to test the overexpression and knockdown efficiency. UCHL3 overexpression enhanced A549 and H1299 cell growth in vitro (Fig. 2a, b). Moreover, UCHL3 overexpression in the A549 and H1299 cell lines obviously increased colony formation ability (Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Fig. S2a, b). Furthermore, both UCHL3-overexpressing cell lines showed more stem-like characteristics, such as spheroid growth ability (Fig. 2e, f) and ALDH activity, as shown by ALDEFLUOR assays (Fig. 2g), than vector cells. As functional markers of cancer stem cells, side populations (SPs) in the cell lines show stem-like properties. We used flow cytometry to detect the percentage of SP cells in vector-transfected and UCHL3-overexpressing cells and found that UCHL3-overexpressing cells had a higher percentage of SP cells (Fig. 2h, i). Moreover, flow cytometry analysis showed that the percentage of CD338-positive cells among UCHL3-overexpressing cells was higher than that among vector-transfected cells (Fig. 2j, k).
To further investigate the effect of UCHL3 on tumor formation in vivo, we performed a xenograft model experiment. Compared with the injection of vector-transfected A549 cells, injection of UCHL3-overexpressing A549 cells significantly increased tumor size, volume, and weight after 1 month of growth (Fig. 2l–n), while the overall body weight was maintained (Supplementary Fig. S2c). These results conclusively show that UCHL3 overexpression is related to cell growth, colony formation, spheroid formation, and tumor growth and that UCHL3 elevates stem-like properties and has critical oncogenic functions in cancer progression.
Knockdown of UCHL3 inhibited cell growth, colony formation, tumor formation, and tumor stem-like properties
To reveal the physiological role of UCHL3 in lung cancer, we stably knocked down UCHL3 in H358 cells. Four different UCHL3-targeting shRNAs were applied to knock down UCHL3 expression, and shUCHL3#1 and shUCHL3#2 achieved a knockdown efficiency of ~100%. Therefore, unless otherwise specified, shUCHL3#1 and shUCHL3#2 were used in subsequent studies. As expected, the growth rate of UCHL3-knockdown cells was significantly slower than that in control cells (Fig. 3a). Additionally, the knockdown of UCHL3 markedly restrained the colony formation ability of the cells (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. S3a), and H358 cells depleted of UCHL3 showed fewer stem-like characteristics in the spheroid formation experiment (Fig. 3c). Flow cytometry analysis indicated that knockdown of UCHL3 reduced the proportion of CD338+ H358 cells (Fig. 3d). By ALDEFLUOR analysis, after UCHL3 depletion, the ALDH activity in H358 cells was decreased (Fig. 3e), suggesting that UCHL3 promotes stem-like properties in lung cancer.
To investigate in vivo tumor formation, H358 cells were injected into nude mice, and we found that UCHL3 depletion significantly reduced tumor size, volume, and weight (Fig. 3f–h); however, there was no significant difference in body weight between the two groups (Supplementary Fig. S3b). In general, these results indicated that UCHL3 promotes cancer stem-like properties via an oncogenic function.
UCHL3 interacts with AhR and stabilizes the AhR protein through deubiquitination
Our previous studies indicated that irradiation-resistant (IR) cells show increased stem-like characteristics with enhanced growth and metastasis capacity.26,39 To investigate whether UCHL3 regulates biological functions through AhR, we used Western blotting to determine whether expression levels of the AhR protein in A549 and H1299 cells were upregulated after UCHL3 overexpression (Fig. 4a, b). Furthermore, in stable UCHL3-knockdown H358 cells, expression of the AhR protein was downregulated (Fig. 4c), indicating that UCHL3 plays a key role in regulating AhR expression in lung cancer. To determine whether UCHL3 stabilizes the AhR protein through deubiquitination, we first examined AhR protein degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome system by using cycloheximide (CHX) and traced the protein levels. Indeed, the AhR protein was gradually degraded with CHX treatment (Supplementary Fig. S4a). Then, we explored the interaction between the UCHL3 and AhR proteins. AhR and UCHL3 plasmids were cotransfected into HEK293T cells for protein–protein interaction analysis via coimmunoprecipitation, and we discovered that the UCHL3 protein coimmunoprecipitated with AhR (Fig. 4d), indicating a relationship between UCHL3 and AhR. To further determine whether UCHL3 can protect the AhR protein by delaying its degradation, we overexpressed UCHL3 in A549 and H1299 cells, knocked down UCHL3 in H358 cells using two different shRNAs and detected the AhR protein degradation rate by cycloheximide (CHX) chase assay. As anticipated, when UCHL3 was overexpressed, AhR protein degradation was reduced (Fig. 4e, f). The AhR protein half-life was decreased after depletion of UCHL3 (Fig. 4g). To directly detect whether UCHL3 regulates AhR protein stabilization via deubiquitination, endogenous polyubiquitinated AhR protein was immunoprecipitated with anti-AhR antibody and examined using anti-Ub antibody. Notably, in cells not treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132, AhR was not protected from degradation.40,41 Furthermore, overexpression of UCHL3 decreased the ubiquitination of endogenous AhR in A549 and H1299 cells (Fig. 4h, i), while depletion of endogenous UCHL3 elevated the ubiquitination level of endogenous AhR in H358 cells (Fig. 4j). In summary, our experiments indicate that UCHL3 is a specific DUB for AhR and that UCHL3 elevates AhR protein stabilization through deubiquitination.
We further detected mRNA levels in 35 paired ADC and SCC lung cancer and corresponding paracancerous normal tissues (Supplementary Fig. S4b, c) and noted no difference between histologic subtypes. AhR protein levels were markedly upregulated in ADC and SCC lung cancer tissues compared with corresponding paracancerous normal tissues (Supplementary Fig. S4d, e). Moreover, Kaplan–Meier curves showed that patients expressed different AhR mRNA levels but showed no difference in prognosis (Supplementary Fig. S4f), indicating that high AhR expression in lung cancer is mainly due to posttranslational regulation.
UCHL3 promotes tumor stem-like properties through AhR
In our previous studies, we showed that AhR promotes lung cancer cell irradiation resistance and tumor stem-like properties.26 As UCHL3 is a DUB of AhR, we sought to understand more about UCHL3-mediated regulation of tumor stem-like properties. We searched for similar molecular mechanisms in cell lines expressing UCHL3. Since AhR is located in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, we separately assessed the expression of UCHL3 in the cytoplasm and nucleus after fractionation and discovered that the nuclear localization of AhR was elevated in cells overexpressing UCHL3 compared to control cells (Fig. 5a; Supplementary Fig. S4g), while knockdown of UCHL3 had the opposite result (Supplementary Fig. S4h), indicating that AhR might play a regulatory role in the expression of stemness genes. As expected, overexpression of UCHL3 increased the expression of ABCG2, c-Myc and KLF4, genes associated with stemness, at the protein level in A549 and H1299 cells (Fig. 5b, c), while depletion of UCHL3 decreased their protein expression (Fig. 5d). Moreover, we found that AhR could bind the promoter regions of stemness-related genes using ALGGEN (http://alggen.lsi.upc.es/). ChIP assays showed that AhR was recruited to the promoters of the stemness-related genes ABCG2, KLF4, c-Myc and ALDH1 in A549 cells and that the enrichment of their promoter regions in AhR was greater in A549 cells overexpressing UCHL3 than in control cells (Fig. 5e). Finally, we determined that stemness-associated markers were significantly upregulated in xenograft tumor samples with UCHL3 protein knockdown compared with the control groups (Fig. 5f, g). To determine whether UCHL3-medaited control of the levels of stemness-related genes is dependent on AhR, we tested these genes in the absence of AhR by transient transfection with AhR-knockdown shRNA plasmids and blank plasmid. Our results demonstrated that in the absence of AhR, expression of the stemness-related genes ABCG2, c-Myc and KLF4 was decreased. Thus, the overexpression of UCHL3 controls the levels of these genes in a manner dependent on AhR (Fig. 5h, i). In summary, our findings revealed that AhR plays a critical role in maintaining the stem-like properties of cells overexpressing UCHL3, confirming that UCHL3 promotes tumor stem-like properties through stabilizing AhR.
UCHL3 increases AhR protein stability in a DUB activity-dependent manner
Analysis of UCHL3 mutants showed that the aspartic acid residue at position 33 and the cysteine residue at position 95 are key sites for the interaction between UCHL3 and ubiquitin.42 To restore the knockdown effects of UCHL3 shRNAs, we re-expressed wild-type UCHL3 and the inactive mutants UCHL3-C95S and UCHL3-D33A in H358 cells with stable UCHL3 knockdown. WT UCHL3 obviously increased AhR and c-Myc protein levels, whereas the mutants did not (Fig. 6a). We also found that some UCHL3 point mutants affected the UCHL3 protein level (Supplementary Fig. S5a). Interestingly, stable overexpression of UCHL3 mutants in A549 cells significantly attenuated cell growth compared to that in cells expressing WT UCHL3 (Fig. 6b). FACS analysis showed that the UCHL3 mutants reduced the number of SP cells among A549 cells (Fig. 6c). Moreover, UCHL3 knockdown significantly suppressed colony formation ability (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Fig. S5b). A549 cells expressing UCHL3 mutants showed fewer stem-like characteristics, as shown by their decreased ability to form spheroids (Fig. 6e), suggesting that UCHL3 stabilizes the AhR protein in a DUB activity-dependent manner. In addition, we cotransfected HEK293T cells with AhR, Ub and WT UCHL3 or the UCHL3-C95S, UCHL3-D33A and UCHL3-G96D mutants. The levels of polyubiquitinated AhR protein were tested by using anti-Ub antibody. WT UCHL3, but not UCHL3-C95S, significantly reduced AhR protein polyubiquitination (Fig. 6f), whereas the other mutants did not decrease AhR polyubiquitination. Generally, these findings indicated that as a DUB of AhR, UCHL3 increases AhR protein stabilization in a DUB activity-dependent manner.
Inhibition of UCHL3 weakened cancer stem cell properties
To further demonstrate our findings, we used TCID, a small-molecule inhibitor of UCHL3; under our experimental conditions, we first detected whether TCID inhibits the deubiquitinase activity of UCHL3 against AhR. As expected, the ability of UCHL3 to deubiquitinate AhR was almost completely abrogated by TCID treatment (Fig. 7a). Correspondingly, TCID treatment reduced AhR protein levels and stemness-associated markers in UCHL3-overexpressing A549 cells without affecting AhR mRNA levels (Fig. 7b, c), suggesting that TCID, like UCHL3 knockdown, promotes AhR ubiquitination and degradation. Moreover, cotreatment with TCID and CHX significantly shortened the half-life of the AhR protein (Fig. 7d). FACS analysis showed that inhibition of UCHL3 using TCID reduced CD338 expression and the percentage of SP cells among A549 cells overexpressing UCHL3 (Fig. 7e, f). We also found that treatment of UCHL3-overexpressing cells with TCID markedly suppressed cell proliferation and colony formation ability (Fig. 7g, h). Inhibition of UCHL3 reduced stem-like characteristics, as shown by their decreased ability to form spheroids (Fig. 7i), suggesting that UCHL3 promotes stem-like characteristics in lung cancer. Collectively, these findings indicate that inhibition of UCHL3 may effectively eliminate lung cancer stem cell properties by promoting AhR destabilization. In view of our findings, we designed a model (Fig. 8) in which UCHL3 acts as a novel DUB of AhR that participates in tumorigenesis and stem-like properties.
Discussion
The transcription factor AhR promotes cancer cell cycle progression, survival, migration, stemness and tumorigenesis.43–46 AhR is a primary factor affecting tumorigenesis and plays an important role in breast CSCs.47,48 A better comprehension of the AhR upstream regulatory mechanism may reveal new therapeutic targets for AhR-positive cancers. DUBs can reverse ubiquitination. We performed a series of experiments and identified UCHL3 as a DUB of AhR. First, UCHL3 and AhR directly interact. Second, UCHL3 reduces AhR polyubiquitination and enhances AhR protein stabilization in a DUB activity-dependent manner, and this ability could be inhibited by TCID, a UCHL3 inhibitor. Finally, UCHL3 functions to promote tumor growth and lung cancer stem-like properties through AhR.
Disorder in the deubiquitination process is usually related to tumorigenesis.6 Deubiquitination regulates the functions of many tumorigenesis-associated proteins, such as p53, Mdm2, Sirt1 and PTEN.49–53 Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are cancer cells with an infinite capacity to proliferate, giving them stem cell-like characteristics, and CSCs play a key role in tumor recurrence, resistance and progression.54 The transcription factor network, CSC-associated proteins and the microenvironment are three major factors that affect CSC maintenance and differentiation.55,56 The ubiquitination and deubiquitination of proteins associated with stemness are very important for the maintenance and differentiation of CSCs. Furthermore, the ubiquitination and deubiquitination of some crucial proteins in stem cells can determine cell fate.57,58 Recently, DUBs have been shown to be promising cancer therapeutic targets,59–61 but their roles in cancer cell stemness remain unclear. The identification of deubiquitylases of transcription factors and key proteins can improve comprehension of the activation mechanism in CSCs.
Many DUBs are involved in cancer progression in a variety of organs. Nevertheless, until recently, the mechanism and role of UCHL3 in carcinogenesis have remained elusive. UCHL3 may play a critical role in promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and DNA damage repair.42,62–64 A limited number of studies on the role of UCHL3 in tumors have been conducted, and very few UCHL3 targets have been identified. In this study, we showed that UCHL3 overexpression increased tumor stem-like properties. Stemness-related genes and other stemness markers were elevated in lung cancer cells overexpressing UCHL3. Importantly, stable knockdown of UCHL3 suppressed tumor growth from H358 cells and inhibited tumor stem-like properties. Moreover, TCID attenuated UCHL3 activity without affecting its protein level. Thus, TCID can significantly reduce AhR protein levels and diminish tumor stem-like properties. Nevertheless, our results suggest that WT UCHL3, but not UCHL3 mutants, promotes tumor growth and stem-like properties through stabilizing AhR in a DUB activity-dependent manner. The mechanism by which UCHL3 promotes tumor stem-like properties through AhR requires further investigation.
In conclusion, UCHL3 is an AhR DUB that promotes lung cancer proliferation, tumor growth and tumor stem-like properties through stabilizing AhR by its deubiquitination. In this paper, we found a new mechanism of AhR regulation and functional mechanism by which UCHL3 promotes lung cancer progression and stemness. Our research indicates that UCHL3 might serve as a therapeutic target in lung cancer.
Materials and methods
Cell culture, antibodies, plasmids, siRNAs, and chemicals
The following NSCLC cell lines were used in this paper: A549 (ATCC: CCL-185™), H1299 (ATCC: CRL-5803™) and H358 (ATCC: CRL-5807™). All cell lines were purchased from ATCC. The following media were required for cell culture: 1:1 DME/F12 (HyClone, UT, USA) for the A549 cell line, DMEM (Gibco, NY, USA) for the HEK293T cell line, and RPMI1640 (Gibco) for other cell lines. Cells were cultured in a cell incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2, and 10% (v/v) FBS was added to the medium. Mycoplasma contamination was detected and shown to be negative in all cell lines, and only cells that had been passaged no more than 10 times after initial resuscitation from cryopreservation were used. All cell lines were identified by short tandem repeat analysis prior to use. UCHL3 cDNA clones were purchased from Vigene Biosciences. The FLAG-UCHL3 overexpression plasmid was established by insertion of the UCHL3 cDNA into the pLVX-EF1α-IRES-Puro vector (catalog No. 631988; Clontech, CA, USA). The primers used in this paper are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Targeted and nontargeted control vector lentiviral shRNA clones were established by GeneChem (www.genechem.com.cn) (Shanghai, China). The sequences of shRNAs targeting UCHL3 and AhR used in this paper are presented in Supplementary Table 1. Plasmid transfection using Lipofectamine® 2000 was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and colonies with stable expression were screened by puromycin (2 μg/ml). Cycloheximide (CHX, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) And TCID (B1467, APExBIO, TX, USA) were also used in the cell experiments.
Cell proliferation and colony formation assays
In the cell proliferation assay, the CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) kit (Promega, WI, USA) was used in accordance with its instructions. First, each well of a 96-well plate was seeded with 500 cells. Measurement of the OD450 began 1 h after mixing with MTS reagent. In the cell colony formation experiment, each of the wells of six-well plates was seeded with approximately 500 cells that were then cultured in a cell incubator. Two weeks later, the cells were fixed with methanol and stained with 0.5% crystal violet. Clones were counted by using a microscope and ImageJ software (1.47 v, NIH, USA).
Oncosphere formation assay
Cells were cultured in ultralow attachment culture dishes (Corning, NY, USA) with serum-free DMEM-F12 medium containing insulin (50 μg/ml final concentration, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), albumin (bovine) fraction V (0.4% final volume concentration, Sigma-Aldrich, MO), N-2 Plus Media Supplement (Life Technologies, NY, USA), B-27 Supplement (Life Technologies, NY, USA), EGF (20 μg/ml final concentration, PeproTech, NJ, USA), and basic FGF (10 μg/ml final concentration, PeproTech, NJ, USA) to sustain the growth of undifferentiated oncospheres. After the cells had been continuously incubated in a cell incubator for 1–2 weeks, cells in oncospheres were counted under a microscope.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays
In general, the ChIP assay was performed as described before65,66 with minor modifications. Formaldehyde (1% final volume concentration, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) was used to fix the cells (5 × 106) at temperature for 10 min. Then, 1.25 M glycine was added and incubated at room temperature for 5 min to terminate fixation. Ultrasonication was carried out in a Qsonica sonicator for 6 min (20 s on; 20 s off), with each immunoprecipitation assay using 300 μg of protein-chromatin complex. The antibody-protein complex was captured using preblocked Dynabeads protein G (10004D, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). ChIP DNA was detected in an ABI 7500 real-time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) using SYBR Green (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). The primers used in this assay are listed in Supplemental Table 2. The antibody used was anti-AhR (ab126703, Abcam, MA, USA) antibody.
Western blot analysis and coimmunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay
Collected cells were washed three times in 1x PBS and then lysed on ice in IP lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail. An SDS-polyacrylamide gel was used to separate the total proteins obtained by cell lysis, which were then transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. The primary antibodies used for western blot analysis are listed below. Protein detection was performed using mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (A5441, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), rabbit monoclonal anti-UCHL3 (8141P, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), rabbit monoclonal anti-c-Myc (5605, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), mouse polyclonal anti-AhR (sc-133088, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-ABCG2 (MAB4146, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-KLF4 (sc-20691×, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-histone-H3 (17168-1-AP, Proteintech, IL, USA), and mouse monoclonal anti-α-tubulin (sc-5286, Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
For immunoprecipitation experiments, cells were cultured overnight in culture dishes (~1.5 × 106 cells per dish). Then, the cells were harvested and lysed in IP buffer, and 20 μL of Dynabeads protein G (10004D, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) was added to 1 mg of total protein, stirred and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h. The supernatant was then collected after centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 10 min. The collected supernatant was subjected to mild rotation in the presence of 1x protease inhibitors and incubated with 2 μg of anti-AhR antibody (sc-133088, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4 °C overnight. The precipitated protein complex was recovered with a magnetic rack, and then the beads were washed with cold immunoprecipitation assay buffer three times. The beads collected from the procedure above were mixed with IP buffer and protein loading buffer. Then, the cells were boiled at 100 °C for 5 min to free the bound protein. Total protein (20 μg) was used as an input control. Samples were analyzed by western blotting with antibodies against AhR and UCHL3.
ALDEFLUOR assay and flow cytometry
In accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol, cells were stained with antibodies or fluorescent dyes (CD338-PerCP-Cy™5.5, BD Bioscience, CA, USA; Hoechst 33342, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) before being loaded for flow cytometry. A FACSCalibur (BD Immunocytometry Systems, CA, USA) was applied to detect the labeled cells, and the resulting analysis was performed in FlowJo software. IgG isotype controls were used to eliminate background due to the nonspecific binding of antibodies to the cell surface to accurately set the threshold for negative and positive cells. Cell clusters and debris were removed by lateral scattering and forward scattering analysis. With the guidance and help of Dr. Suling Liu (Fudan University, Shanghai, China), an ALDEFLUOR kit (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) was utilized as described before.67
RT-qPCR
TRIzol reagent (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) was used to separate total RNA, and a PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) containing gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) was used to generate cDNA. Real-time PCR was run in an ABI 7500 Real-time PCR instrument using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master. Relative gene expression was standardized by β-actin.
Histology and immunohistochemistry
The Department of Pathology at Xiangya Hospital verified and provided biopsies of lung cancer and associated diseases. The method used for IHC analysis of paraffin sections from lung cancer tissues can be found in previous literature. Images of the paraffin sections were captured with a CX41 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a DP-72 microscope digital camera system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and differential quantification was performed by two pathologists from Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China.
Subcellular fractionation
In accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol, to determine the localization of AhR, cytoplasmic and nuclear sections were isolated and collected with Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA).
Nude mice and study approval
Four- to six-week-old female SCID mice were obtained from Hunan SJA Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Changsha, China). Animal experiments were conducted with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Central South University of the Xiangya School of Medicine and adhered to the legal mandates and federal guidelines for animal protection and maintenance. UCHL3-overexpressing or UCHL3-silenced cells and the corresponding control cells were injected subcutaneously into the axilla of each mouse (1 × 107 cells/mouse). Tumor volume and mouse weight were later measured every 3 days until sacrifice at 31 days. Tumors were weighed, fixed in 10% formalin and then paraffin embedded or used to extract RNA and protein.
Statistical analyses
Except for the nude mouse experiments, experiments were repeated at least three times. Data are shown as the mean ± SD or SEM. GraphPad Prism 6.0 software was used to conduct statistical analyses. Student’s t-test was used to determine the significance of differences between two groups, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to compare more than two groups. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for correlation analysis. Differences were considered statistically significant in the following case: p < 0.05 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Prof. Suling Liu (Fudan University, Shanghai, China) very much for guidance and friendly assistance with the ALDEFLUOR assay. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672991 and 81874139 [S.L.], 81672787 [Y.T.], 81672308 [X.W.]) and the National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB553903 [Y.T.]) supported this study.
Author contributions
In this report, Y.T. and S.L. designed the experimental scheme and drafted the manuscript. L.O., B.Y., Y.L., C.M., M.W., N.L., Z.W., S.P.L., Y.S., and L.C. performed the experiments. L.Z., D.X., X.W., and S.L. were in responsible for collecting samples and data analysis. S.L., Y.T., Y.Cao, and Y.Cheng discussed and modified the original paper. S.Liu was responsible for the initial ideas related to this study and composed and approved the original paper. The paper was approved by all authors.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This research was carried at the Institute of Medical Sciences, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, China. All experimental schemes were assessed and approved by the Joint Ethics Committee of the Central South University Health Authority and implemented according to national guidelines.
Consent for publication
All authors have read and approved this paper, which has not been submitted for publication elsewhere and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Contributor Information
Shuang Liu, Email: shuangliu2016@csu.edu.cn.
Yongguang Tao, Email: taoyong@csu.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41392-020-0181-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Zheng N, Shabek N. Ubiquitin Ligases: Structure, Function, And Regulation. Annu Rev. Biochem. 2017;86:129–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wilkinson KD. Ubiquitination and deubiquitination: targeting of proteins for degradation by the proteasome. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 2000;11:141–148. doi: 10.1006/scdb.2000.0164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mevissen TET, Komander D. Mechanisms of deubiquitinase specificity and regulation. Annu Rev. Biochem. 2017;86:159–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Neutzner M, Neutzner A. Enzymes of ubiquitination and deubiquitination. Essays Biochem. 2012;52:37–50. doi: 10.1042/bse0520037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Katz EJ, Isasa M, Crosas B. A new map to understand deubiquitination. Biochem Soc. Trans. 2010;38:21–28. doi: 10.1042/BST0380021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sacco JJ, Coulson JM, Clague MJ, Urbe S. Emerging roles of deubiquitinases in cancer-associated pathways. IUBMB Life. 2010;62:140–157. doi: 10.1002/iub.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Todi SV, Paulson HL. Balancing act: deubiquitinating enzymes in the nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34:370–382. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nijman SM, et al. A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell. 2005;123:773–786. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sowa ME, Bennett EJ, Gygi SP, Harper JW. Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell. 2009;138:389–403. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Amerik AY, Hochstrasser M. Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2004;1695:189–207. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Soboleva TA, Baker RT. Deubiquitinating enzymes: their functions and substrate specificity. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2004;5:191–200. doi: 10.2174/1389203043379765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fang Y, Fu D, Shen XZ. The potential role of ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolases in oncogenesis. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2010;1806:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Day IN, Thompson RJ. UCHL1 (PGP 9.5): neuronal biomarker and ubiquitin system protein. Prog. Neurobiol. 2010;90:327–362. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fukuda T, et al. Functional link between BRCA1 and BAP1 through Histone H2A, Heterochromatin and DNA damage response. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 2016;16:101–109. doi: 10.2174/1568009615666151030102427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kurihara LJ, Semenova E, Levorse JM, Tilghman SM. Expression and functional analysis of Uch-L3 during mouse development. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000;20:2498–2504. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.7.2498-2504.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Frickel EM, et al. Apicomplexan UCHL3 retains dual specificity for ubiquitin and Nedd8 throughout evolution. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:1601–1610. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00896.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rolen U, et al. Activity profiling of deubiquitinating enzymes in cervical carcinoma biopsies and cell lines. Mol. Carcinog. 2006;45:260–269. doi: 10.1002/mc.20177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Miyoshi Y, et al. High expression of ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1 and -L3 mRNA predicts early recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2006;97:523–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00202.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nebert DW. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR): “pioneer member” of the basic-helix/loop/helix per-Arnt-sim (bHLH/PAS) family of “sensors” of foreign and endogenous signals. Prog. Lipid Res. 2017;67:38–57. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2017.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shinde R, McGaha TL. The Aryl hydrocarbon receptor: connecting immunity to the microenvironment. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:1005–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen Y, Widschwendter M, Teschendorff AE. Systems-epigenomics inference of transcription factor activity implicates aryl-hydrocarbon-receptor inactivation as a key event in lung cancer development. Genome Biol. 2017;18:236. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1366-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chang JT, et al. Requirement of aryl hydrocarbon receptor overexpression for CYP1B1 up-regulation and cell growth in human lung adenocarcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:38–45. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ye M, et al. Activation of the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor leads to resistance to EGFR TKIs in non-small cell lung cancer by activating src-mediated bypass signaling. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;24:1227–1239. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mao C, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor activated by benzo (a) pyrene promotes SMARCA6 expression in NSCLC. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018;8:1214–1227. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu S, Piatigorsky J. Regulation of mouse small heat shock protein alphab-crystallin gene by aryl hydrocarbon receptor. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yan B, et al. Activation of AhR with nuclear IKKalpha regulates cancer stem-like properties in the occurrence of radioresistance. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:490. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0542-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Giancotti FG. Mechanisms governing metastatic dormancy and reactivation. Cell. 2013;155:750–764. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Desai TJ, Brownfield DG, Krasnow MA. Alveolar progenitor and stem cells in lung development, renewal and cancer. Nature. 2014;507:190–194. doi: 10.1038/nature12930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Suva ML, Riggi N, Bernstein BE. Epigenetic reprogramming in cancer. Science. 2013;339:1567–1570. doi: 10.1126/science.1230184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Apostolou E, Hochedlinger K. Chromatin dynamics during cellular reprogramming. Nature. 2013;502:462–471. doi: 10.1038/nature12749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kreso A, et al. Self-renewal as a therapeutic target in human colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 2014;20:29–36. doi: 10.1038/nm.3418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Plaks V, Kong N, Werb Z. The cancer stem cell niche: how essential is the niche in regulating stemness of tumor cells? Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16:225–238. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Skvortsova I, Debbage P, Kumar V, Skvortsov S. Radiation resistance: cancer stem cells (CSCs) and their enigmatic pro-survival signaling. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015;35:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lun SW, et al. CD44+ cancer stem-like cells in EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e52426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kurth I, et al. Cancer stem cell related markers of radioresistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6:34494–34509. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cojoc M, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase is regulated by beta-Catenin/TCF and promotes radioresistance in prostate cancer progenitor cells. Cancer Res. 2015;75:1482–1494. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen W, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016;66:115–132. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zeng H, et al. Cancer survival in China, 2003-2005: a population-based study. Int J. Cancer. 2015;136:1921–1930. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shi Y, et al. Nuclear EGFR-PKM2 axis induces cancer stem cell-like characteristics in irradiation-resistant cells. Cancer Lett. 2018;422:81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nguyen PM, et al. p23 co-chaperone protects the aryl hydrocarbon receptor from degradation in mouse and human cell lines. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;84:838–850. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vrzal R, Dvorak Z. The comparative effects of diethyldithiocarbamate-copper complex with established proteasome inhibitors on expression levels of CYP1A2/3A4 and their master regulators, aryl hydrocarbon and pregnane X receptor in primary cultures of human hepatocytes. Fundam. Clin. Pharm. 2016;30:585–595. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Song HM, Lee JE, Kim JH. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L3 regulates EMT process and cancer metastasis in prostate cell lines. Biochem Biophys. Res Commun. 2014;452:722–727. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.08.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bersten DC, Sullivan AE, Peet DJ, Whitelaw ML. bHLH-PAS proteins in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2013;13:827–841. doi: 10.1038/nrc3621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Murray IA, Patterson AD, Perdew GH. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands in cancer: friend and foe. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2014;14:801–814. doi: 10.1038/nrc3846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Opitz CA, et al. An endogenous tumour-promoting ligand of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature. 2011;478:197–203. doi: 10.1038/nature10491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.DiNatale BC, et al. Ah receptor antagonism represses head and neck tumor cell aggressive phenotype. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012;10:1369–1379. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Prud’homme GJ, et al. Breast cancer stem-like cells are inhibited by a non-toxic aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Stanford EA, et al. The role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in the development of cells with the molecular and functional characteristics of cancer stem-like cells. BMC Biol. 2016;14:20. doi: 10.1186/s12915-016-0240-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yuan J, et al. USP10 regulates p53 localization and stability by deubiquitinating p53. Cell. 2010;140:384–396. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sheng Y, et al. Molecular recognition of p53 and MDM2 by USP7/HAUSP. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006;13:285–291. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Song MS, et al. The deubiquitinylation and localization of PTEN are regulated by a HAUSP-PML network. Nature. 2008;455:813–817. doi: 10.1038/nature07290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang J, et al. Deubiquitylation and stabilization of PTEN by USP13. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013;15:1486–1494. doi: 10.1038/ncb2874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lin Z, et al. USP22 antagonizes p53 transcriptional activation by deubiquitinating Sirt1 to suppress cell apoptosis and is required for mouse embryonic development. Mol. Cell. 2012;46:484–494. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Krause M, Dubrovska A, Linge A, Baumann M. Cancer stem cells: radioresistance, prediction of radiotherapy outcome and specific targets for combined treatments. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017;109:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Qiu GZ, et al. The bad seed gardener: Deubiquitinases in the cancer stem-cell signaling network and therapeutic resistance. Pharm. Ther. 2017;172:127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Suresh B, Lee J, Kim KS, Ramakrishna S. The importance of Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination in cellular reprogramming. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:6705927. doi: 10.1155/2016/6705927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Haq S, Suresh B, Ramakrishna S. Deubiquitylating enzymes as cancer stem cell therapeutics. Biochim Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2018;1869:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lei H, Shan H, Wu Y. Targeting deubiquitinating enzymes in cancer stem cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17:101. doi: 10.1186/s12935-017-0472-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fraile JM, et al. USP39 Deubiquitinase is essential for KRAS oncogene-driven cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:4164–4175. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.762757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhao C, et al. A novel nickel complex works as a proteasomal deubiquitinase inhibitor for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2016;35:5916–5927. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Suresh B, Lee J, Kim H, Ramakrishna S. Regulation of pluripotency and differentiation by deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23:1257–1264. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Luo K, et al. A phosphorylation-deubiquitination cascade regulates the BRCA2-RAD51 axis in homologous recombination. Genes Dev. 2016;30:2581–2595. doi: 10.1101/gad.289439.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Nishi R, et al. The deubiquitylating enzyme UCHL3 regulates Ku80 retention at sites of DNA damage. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:17891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36235-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Liao C, et al. UCHL3 regulates topoisomerase-induced chromosomal break repair by controlling TDP1 proteostasis. Cell Rep. 2018;23:3352–3365. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shi Y, et al. Nuclear epidermal growth factor receptor interacts with transcriptional intermediary factor 2 to activate cyclin D1 gene expression triggered by the oncoprotein latent membrane protein 1. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1468–1478. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jiang Y, et al. Repression of Hox genes by LMP1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and modulation of glycolytic pathway genes by HoxC8. Oncogene. 2015;34:6079–6091. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ginestier C, et al. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:555–567. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.