Skip to main content
Tobacco Induced Diseases logoLink to Tobacco Induced Diseases
. 2020 Jun 12;18:53. doi: 10.18332/tid/122586

Malaysian adolescents’ exposure to secondhand smoke in the car of their parents/guardians: A nationwide cross-sectional school-based study

Kuang H Lim 1,, Hui L Lim 2, Sumarni M Ghazali 1, Chee C Kee 3, Chien H Teh 1, Balvinder S Gill 1, Mohd Z Taib 1, Pei P Heng 1, Jia H Lim 4
PMCID: PMC7299278  PMID: 32565765

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We investigated the prevalence of children’s exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) in the car of their parents/guardians and the associated factors.

METHODS

A self-administered validated questionnaire was used to obtain data from the nationally representative samples of school-going adolescents aged 11–19 years in Malaysia. Prevalence rates were computed and chi-squared tests and multiple logistic regression were conducted.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 23.3% reported exposure to SHS at least once in the car of their parents/guardians during the last 7 days before the survey. The prevalence and likelihood of SHS exposure were significantly higher in Malays, descendants of natives of Sabah and Sarawak, schools in rural areas, females, and current smokers. However, age group and knowledge on the harmful effects of SHS were not significant after adjusting for confounding effects.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of school-going adolescents were exposed to secondhand smoke in the car of their parents/guardians. This highlights the need for effective tobacco control measures to include health promotion and smoke-free car regulations to be introduced to prevent severe health hazards and to reduce smoking initiation among non-smoking adolescents.

Keywords: school-going adolescent, parent/guardian transport, secondhand smoke, smoking status

INTRODUCTION

Secondhand smoke (SHS) is the smoke released from burning tobacco products and then exhaled by smokers1. It consists of gases, particulate matter, nicotine and other substances, some of which are carcinogenic1,2. SHS has been identified as one of the main factors of indoor air pollution3 for which there is no safe level of exposure1. One per cent of global mortality is related to SHS, with 61% of the Disability Adjusted Life Years reported among children. In addition to morbidity, SHS is estimated to cause more than 0.6 million deaths annually, 28% of which are amongst children4.

The higher proportion of morbidity and mortality reported among children compared to adults was due to the higher air inhalation (per body weight compared to adults), less developed immune system, and inability to move away from the source2. In addition, children may have a higher breathing rate. Children’s exposure to SHS increases the risk of respiratory health diseases such as coughing, asthma, bronchitis, and pneumonia, which adversely affects their lung function5, increases the risk of anaesthetic complications and some negative surgical outcomes in children6. Furthermore, exposure to SHS may affect their cognitive development7. The risk for non-smoking adolescents to initiate smoking is higher compared to their counterparts who are not exposed to SHS8,9. Therefore, the reduction of SHS exposure has been one of the main missions of the Ministry of Health, Malaysia, in order to reduce the health-related problems caused by SHS10.

Various studies have reported that the exposure of SHS in confined spaces such as cars results in more adverse health effects compared to exposure in other places such as home, workplace or cafe/bars, even in some public areas where smoking is allowed11,12. This is because the concentration of SHS is significantly higher in confined areas such as in cars11. Scientific evidence suggests that smoking in a car, even for a short period of time, produces a concentration of respirable particles that is potentially harmful to children13. In addition, the pollutants of SHS will be adsorbed onto the inside surfaces of the car and remain there for a long period, due to the types of materials used for the inside of cars14. Hence, there is also thirdhand smoke exposure (deposited toxicants) that further increases the health risks of passengers15. Studies also revealed that the source of SHS exposure in parent/guardian cars originates from parent/guardian and family members who are smoking16.

Studies on SHS exposure among youth and school-going adolescents have been carried out in Malaysia17,18. Ghazali et al.18 reported that more than half of the secondary school-going adolescents were exposed to SHS, and the odds of exposure were higher among male, current smokers and if one of their parents/guardians smoked. Similarly, Lim et al.18 who carried out a study in Peninsular Malaysia also reported similar outcomes. However, their studies measured only general exposure to SHS without elaborating on the details of the exposure. To date, only one previous study conducted in Malaysia describes SHS exposure in the car19, but it was only conducted in two states in Malaysia (i.e. Kedah and Melaka), and the samples were not representative of Malaysian school-going adolescents. Therefore, a suitable policy cannot be formulated to address SHS exposure effectively. Given the scarcity of data, this study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors associated with SHS exposure in parent/guardian cars among a representative sample of Malaysian school-going adolescents.

METHODS

Sampling and design

We conducted the Tobacco and E-Cigarette Survey among Malaysian Adolescents (TECMA) in 2016. The detail description of the study can be found in Lim et al. (2018)20. In brief, the TECMA study was a nationwide school-based study that employed a cross-sectional study design and multistage cluster sampling to select a representative sample of public-school-going adolescents aged 11–19 years, based on the latest sampling frame provided by the Ministry of Education, Malaysia. The first stage consisted of states in Malaysia, and the second stage comprised the division of urban and rural areas for each state. Followed by the systematic selection of the secondary or primary schools available in each state, based on proportion-to-size sampling approach, classes from the schools were selected through simple random sampling. All students from the selected classes were invited to participate in the study. In total, 138 schools were selected (82 urban and 56 rural). The sample size was determined by the estimated prevalence rate of 3%, an alpha value of 5%, a design effect of 1.5 to cater for clustering effects among students in the classes, a margin of error of 1.5%, and expected a non-response rate of 20%. Based on these parameters, 13980 respondents were required for the study. A total of 13162 adolescents participated in the study, yielding a response rate of 88.7% (n=13162/14832; estimated population 3684760/4152183).

Questionnaire

The questionnaire was adapted from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey and then pre-validated prior to use. It was the tool used to obtain data from the selected respondents. The self-administered approach was used to collect data from the respondents, with the consent of their parents to participate in the study. The data collection was carried out in the areas provided by the school administration during the school session. The trained research team members briefed the respondents on the objective of the study. The participation in the study was based on a volunteer basis, and students had the right not to answer any of the items in the questionnaire. All information given by respondents was confidential, and their identity anonymous. In addition, the research team members also explained the items in the questionnaire and assistance was provided to respondents who needed clarification about the items. There were no school teachers or staff present during the data collection session.

The Ministry of Education and the respective Department of Education of each state approved the study, while the Ethical Committee of the Ministry of Education and the Medical Research & Ethical Committee of the Ministry of Health, Malaysia, granted ethical approval for the study. The Director-General of Health, Malaysia, granted permission for publication of this work. The authors can be contacted for data requests.

Measurements

The dependent variable in the survey was ‘exposure to SHS’ in the car and was measured using the item: ‘During the past 7 days, have you been exposed to cigarette smoke inside your parents’/guardians’ car?’; with the choice of ‘Yes’ or ‘No’, whilst those who did not travel in their parents’/guardians’ car were instructed to skip the item during the briefing session. Those who answered ‘Yes’ were defined as being exposed to SHS in the parents’/guardians’ car. On the other hand, the independent variables in this study were: gender, age (≤12 years, 13–15 years, ≥16 years), ethnicity (Malay, Chinese, Indian, natives of Sabah and Sarawak, or other including Serani, Sikh, Siamese, Indonesia, Suluk, and foreigners), school location (urban or rural), current smoking status (Yes, smoking at least once in the last 30 days), and knowledge on the potential of SHS to be detrimental to health (No, probably No, Probably Yes, Yes).

Data management and analysis

Data were cleaned and weighted to take into account the complex sample design and response rate to allow generalization of results to the Malaysian school-going adolescents. The characteristics of respondents were assessed through descriptive statistics. Chi-squared analyses were used to test the association between all categorical independent variables and exposure to SHS in the parents’/guardians’ car. Variables with p<0.25 in the chi-squared analysis were included in the binary multiple logistic regression to determine the influence of each variable on SHS exposure in parents’/guardians’ car. Two-way interaction analysis between the independent variables in the models was carried out. All analyses were carried out using SPSS version 20 software at an alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the respondents, male and female respondents were almost equally distributed (51.1% males and 48.9 % females). Two-thirds of the respondents were Malays, followed by Chinese (13.0%), and an almost equal distribution of Indian and natives of Sabah and Sarawak. Slightly more than three-quarters (76.1%) of the respondents were aged <16 years. Of the 13136 respondents (estimated population 3684760), 14.2% (524521/3684759) were current smokers (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of schoolgoing adolescents that participated in the TECMA study, Malaysia 2016

Variables Estimated population Sample Percentage (%)
Gender
Male 1881131 6582 51.1
Female 1803629 6554 48.9
Age (years)
≤12 1369393 4138 37.2
13–15 1434842 5278 38.9
≥16 880523 3720 23.9
Ethnicity
Malay 2433437 9243 66.1
Chinese 477956 1764 13.0
Indian 213674 748 5.8
Native of Sabah 211781 543 5.7
Native of Sarawak 195558 447 5.7
Other 147095 385 4.0
School area
Urban 1677958 7689 45.3
Rural 2006801 5448 54.5
Current smoker
Yes 524231 1807 14.2
No 3160528 11329 85.8

The overall prevalence of SHS exposure in parents’/guardians’ car was 23.3%. SHS exposure was significantly higher among Malay (26.4%, 95% CI: 24.9–27.9%), native of Sabah (24.6%, 95% CI: 20.4–29.3%), and native of Sarawak school-going adolescents (27.3%, 95% CI: 23.0–32.3%) compared to the Chinese students (11.9%, 95% CI: 9.9–14.1%), current smokers (35.1%, 95% CI: 31.2–39.1%) and schools in rural areas (26.9%, 95 CI: 25.2–28.7%). A similar observation was identified in the multivariable analysis, in which the likelihood of SHS exposure was significantly higher among Malays, natives of Sabah and Sarawak, current smokers, and females. However, knowledge of health effects of SHS, which was significant in univariate analysis (16.6% thought that SHS was not harmful to health) was not significant after controlling for the effects of other independent variables (Table 2).

Table 2.

Prevalence of SHS exposure inside the car of their parents/guardians and multivariable logistic regression to determine the associated factors, Malaysia 2016

Variables Estimated population Sample % (95% CI) P AOR (95% CI)
Overall 857360 2849 23.3 (22.2–24.4)
Gender
Male 423825 1403 22.5 (21.1–24.0) 0.177 0.83 (0.71–0.98)
Female 433534 1446 24.1 (22.4–25.8) Ref.
Age (years)
≤12 281312 851 20.6 (19.1–22.2) 0.001 Ref.
13-15 362213 1202 24.2 (23.3–26.4) 1.17 (0.89–1.54)
≥16 213834 796 24.3 (22.1–26.6) 1.15 (0.88–1.50)
Ethnicity
Malay 641373 2263 26.4 (24.9–27.9) <0.001 2.34 (1.64–3.08)
Chinese 56444 189 11.8 (9.9–14.1) Ref.
Indian 27144 84 12.7 (9.7–16.5) 1.03 (0.65–1.65)
Native of Sabah 51916 130 24.6 (20.4–29.3) 1.83 (1.32–2.56)
Native of Sarawak 54402 111 27.3 (23.0–32.3) 2.26 (1.50–3.41)
Other 25303 10 17.3 (13.1–22.4) 1.40 (0.86–2.26)
School area
Urban 317217 1475 18.9 (17.7–20.2) <0.001 Ref.
Rural 540142 1374 26.9 (25.2–28.7) 1.32 (1.03–1.67)
Current smoker
Yes 144741 429 35.1 (31.2–39.1) <0.001 1.85 (1.60–2.14)
No 662303 2256 21.2 (20.1–22.3) Ref.
Perceived SHS as harmful to health
No 36673 115 16.6 (12.4–21.9) 0.001 0.79 (0.58–1.07)
Probably No 29807 99 18.6 (14.5–23.6) 0.84 (0.63–1.12)
Probably Yes 208784 643 25.6 (22.5–29.1) 1.07 (0.94–1.23)
Yes 581785 1990 23.4 (20.4–26.7) 1

AOR: adjusted odds ratio. CI: confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

The SHS exposure rate of 23.3% in this study is very similar to the findings by Azagba et al.21 in Canada, to the 21.4% exposure rate reported by Agaku et al.22 among middle school students in the USA and the value of 23.0% reported among youth in New Zealand23. The prevalence in this study is slightly higher than the exposure rates of 19%24 and 17.3%19 reported among youth in England and Malaysia, respectively. However, the prevalence rate is lower than reported by studies conducted in Portugal and South Carolina, USA, respectively16,25. The differences of sociodemographic characteristics between the respondents in our study and those of Abidin et al. might explain the different prevalence rates between both studies19. The findings are very encouraging, in view of the fact that legislation of smoking prohibition in private vehicles exists in Canada and New Zealand21,23, whereas no such provision exists in Malaysia but the rate of SHS exposure is similar. However, continual concerted efforts should be carried out to reduce and eliminate SHS exposure among youth in vehicles to the level (9%) that has been reported, for instance, in Wales26.

The likelihood of SHS exposure in the parents’/guardians’ car was significantly higher among female respondents. This finding was unexpected in view of the lower prevalence of smoking among female adults or female adolescents in Malaysia. However, the finding is consistent with the outcomes of the studies conducted by Azagba et al.21 and Agaku et al.22 among school-going adolescents in Canada and the USA, respectively. We postulate that the source of SHS exposure could mostly originate from their parents/guardians (mostly father) in view of the higher smoking prevalence of male adults in Malaysia. Malaysia is a patriarchal society (i.e. a social system where the father is the head of the family), and the young have restricted autonomy. The sense of respect of the young for their elders discourages them from complaining about smoking in the car of the elders, especially among their fathers. Therefore, they are less likely to dissuade their parents/guardians from smoking in the car. This postulation was strengthened by the better knowledge and awareness of SHS’s harmful effects among female students compared to males, and there is no significant association between the level of knowledge of the harmful effects of SHS among respondents and exposure to SHS in their parents’/guardians’ car. Another plausible reason might be that parents/guardians in Malaysia are more protective of females compared to males. This partly explains why gender-specific car exposure depends on the socio-cultural environment. As a result, it is suggested that Malaysian female students are more exposed to SHS in their parents’/guardians’ cars because they have a closer relationship with their fathers. However, the hypothesis should be tested in the future through in-depth qualitative and quantitative studies to determine the parents’/guardians’ relationship with their child according to gender.

Exposure to SHS was significantly higher among smokers. We postulated that SHS exposure in the parents’/guardians’ car mostly originates from parents/guardians, family members or respondents who smoke, who may be more lenient towards smoking in their car and are unlikely to prohibit guests or household members, or their children, from smoking inside the vehicle17,18,27. No positive relationship was observed between age and exposure to SHS in parents’/guardians’ cars, after adjusting for the confounding effect of other independent variables. This is in line with other studies among middle and high school USA students22, however differs from studies in Germany where parents/guardians are more concerned about the younger teenagers’ health and safety, and thus exert more control and limit their sons’/daughters’ exposure to the health hazards of SHS28. This calls for in-depth qualitative studies among the parents/guardians to be carried out to elucidate the factors contributing to the findings in this study.

Higher odds of SHS exposure in parents’/guardians’ cars were reported among respondents from schools in rural areas, among the Malay and natives of Sabah and Sarawak compared to their counterparts in urban areas, Chinese and Indian descendants. The higher prevalence of smoking among adult Malays and natives of Sabah and Sarawak, and those who reside in rural areas29, might indicate that smoking is a norm in these groups and, therefore, smoking in any locality, including in the parents’/guardians’ car, is accepted by society. This phenomenon might increase the risk of exposure to SHS among adolescents from schools in rural areas and those of Malay, and native of Sabah and Sarawak, descent. Our postulation is supported by the findings that a higher SHS exposure at home was also reported among similar ethnic groups and residents in rural areas29. However, more studies are required to investigate the actual factors associated with higher SHS exposure in parents’/guardians’ cars, including smoking restrictions, cultural aspects and social norms of smoking among different ethnicities in Malaysia.

Strengths and limitations

This study was not without limitations. Exposure to SHS in parents’/guardians’ cars was self-reported and was not verified through objective measurements and biomarkers (i.e. serum cotinine); therefore, this might introduce a recall bias of SHS exposure. We also did not measure the frequency of SHS exposure in our study, although there is no safe level of SHS exposure16, many studies have shown a dose-response relationship between SHS and adverse health effects30,31. In addition, independent variables that have been shown to be significant in other studies, such as other risky behaviours (such as alcohol consumption)21, smoking restrictions in the car32 and smoking status of respondents’ family members, were not accounted for in this study16. Furthermore, the detailed sociodemographic background of respondents (e.g. income level of respondents’ parents/guardians) was not measured in this study. However, the representativeness and large sample size and high response rate among respondents, enable the generalization of the results to the school-going adolescent population in Malaysia.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight that Malaysian school-going adolescents are frequently exposed to SHS in their parents’/guardians’ car. However, the vast majority of youth are aware of the harmful effects of SHS. Considering the health and social consequences associated with SHS exposure, tailored public health policies and measures such as health promotion activities to increase awareness on the adverse health hazards of smoking among parents/guardians are necessary. In addition, parents/guardians who smoke should be advised to quit and discourage others from smoking in their car. These measures should be given priority since youth lack the ability to avoid SHS in their parents’/guardians’ car, which is exacerbated by the community culture that limits the rights of children compared with those of adults. In addition, the implementation of the KOSPEN (Komuniti Sihat, Pembina Negara – Healthy Community, Nation Builder) community intervention programme by the Ministry of Health of Malaysia should be expanded to include the theme of cigarette smoke-free cars, besides the advocacy of cigarette smoke-free homes33. Furthermore, the introduction of a cigarette smoke-free regulation in cars may be the way forward to reduce SHS exposure in view of the efficacy of the regulations implemented elsewhere25,34 and since the majority of Malaysian adults and youth support smoke-free initiatives35,36.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Director-General of Health, Malaysia, for his permission to publish this work. We also like to thank those who were involved in the study and those who assisted in the collection and management of the data for their support and cooperation.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.

FUNDING

The project was funded by the National Institute of Health, Ministry of Health, Malaysia.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

KHL and HLL wrote the manuscript. SMG, PPH and CHT carried out data management, data cleaning and statistical analysis. CCK and CHT designed the study and calculated the sample size required. CHT, HLL and SMG were responsible for data collection, quality assurance, and coordination of the study. CHT, CCK and HLL were involved in the interpretation and implications of the data. All authors reviewed the manuscript, read and agreed with the content of the final version.

PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW

Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

REFERENCES

  • 1.World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer . Volume 83 of IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2004. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono83.pdf. Accessed February 17, 2020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Spengler J, Adamkiewicz G. Indoor air pollution: an old problem with new challenges. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6(11):2880–2882. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6112880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, Peruga A, Prüss-Ustün A. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet. 2011;377:139–146. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61388-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kabir Z, Manning PJ, Holohan J, Keogan S, Goodman PG, Clancy L. Second-hand smoke exposure in cars and respiratory health effects in children. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(3):629–633. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00167608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chiswell C, Akram Y. Impact of environmental tobacco smoke exposure on anaesthetic and surgical outcomes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:123–130. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ling J, Heffernan T. The Cognitive Deficits Associated with Second-Hand Smoking. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:46. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Healey B, Hoek J, Wilson N, Thomson G, Taylor S, Edwards R. Youth exposure to in-vehicle second-hand smoke and their smoking behaviours: trends and associations in repeated national surveys (2006–2012) Tob Control. 2015;24:146–152. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Okoli CT, Rayens MK, Wiggins AT, Ickes MJ, Butler KM, Hahn EJ. Second-hand tobacco smoke exposure and susceptibility to smoking, perceived addiction, and psychobehavioral symptoms among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2016;64(2):96–103. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1074240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Malaysian Ministry of Health . [National Strategic Plan on Tobacco Control 2015-2020: Strategic planning on smoking] Malaysia: Ministry of Health; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jones MR, Navas-Acien A, Yuan J, Breysse PN. Second-hand tobacco smoke concentrations in motor vehicles: a pilot study. Tob Control. 2009;18:399–404. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.029942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Northcross AL, Trinh M, Kim J, et al. Particulate mass and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exposure from second-hand smoke in the back seat of a vehicle. Tob Control. 2014;23(1):14–20. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Semple S, Apsley A, Galea KS, MacCalman L, Friel B, Snelgrove V. Second-hand smoke in cars: assessing children’s potential exposure during typical journey conditions. Tob Control. 2012;21:578–583. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Matt GE, Fortmann AL, Quintana PJE, et al. Towards smoke-free rental cars: an evaluation of voluntary smoking restrictions in California. Tob Control. 2013;22:201–207. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Martins-Green M, Adhami N, Frankos M, et al. Cigarette smoke toxins deposited on surfaces: implications for human health. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Victoria PD, Machado JC, Ravara SB, et al. Portuguese children’s exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke in the family car. Gac Sanit. 2015;29(2):131–134. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lim HL, Teh CH, Kee CC, Ghazali SM, Pan S, Lim KH. Exposure to second-hand smoke among secondary school-going adolescents: Findings from the Malaysian Adolescent Health Risk Behaviour (MyAHRB) study. Proc Singa Healthcare. 2018;28(1):19–25. doi: 10.1177/2010105818789961. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ghazali SM, Teh CH, Kee CC, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with second-hand smoke exposure among Malaysian adolescents. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17(March) doi: 10.18332/tid/102728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abidin NZ, Zulkifli A, Abidin EZ, et al. Knowledge, attitude and perception of second-hand smoke and factors promoting smoking in Malaysian adolescents. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(7):856–861. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lim KH, Teh CH, Heng PP, et al. Source of cigarettes among youth smokers in Malaysia: Findings from the tobacco and e-cigarette survey among Malaysian school adolescents (TECMA) Tob Ind Dis. 2018;16(November) doi: 10.18332/tid/96297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Azagba S, Latham K, Shan L. Exposure to second-hand smoke in vehicles among Canadian adolescents: Years after the adoption of smoke-free car laws. Addict Behav Rep. 2019;10 doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Agaku IT, Odani S, King BA, Armour BS. Prevalence and correlates of second-hand smoke exposure in the home and in a vehicle among youth in the United States. Prev Med. 2019;126 doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li J, Nelson S, Newcombe R, Walton D. Smoking in cars: knowledge, behaviours and support for smokefree cars legislation among New Zealand smokers and recent quitters. N Z Med J. 2016;129(1439):46–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bogdanovica I, Szatkowski L, Britton J, McNeill A. Smoking in cars in England: a study of school students in an English city. BMC Public Health. 2014;14 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cartmell KB, Miner C, Carpenter MJ, et al. Second-hand smoke exposure in young people and parental rules against smoking at home and in the car. Public Health Rep. 2011;126(4):575–582. doi: 10.1177/003335491112600414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moore GF, Moore L, Littlecott HJ, et al. Prevalence of smoking restrictions and child exposure to second-hand smoke in cars and homes: a repeated cross-sectional survey of children aged 10-11 years in Wales. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lim KH, Lim HL, Teh CH, et al. Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure at home and at the workplace among non-smokers in Malaysia: Findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey 2011. Tob Induc Dis. 2018;16(October) doi: 10.18332/tid/95188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kuntz B, Lampert T. Social disparities in parental smoking and young children’s exposure to second-hand smoke at home: a time-trend analysis of repeated cross-sectional data from the German KiGGS study between 2003-2006 and 2009-2012. BMC Public Health. 2016;16 doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3175-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Institute of Public Health . [National Health and Morbidity Survey 2015. Report on smoking status among Malaysian adults] Malaysian Ministry of Health; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang J, Xu B, Guo D, et al. Dose–Response Relationships between Second-Hand Smoke Exposure and Depressive Symptoms among Adolescents in Guangzhou, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(5):985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Oono IP, Mackay DF, Pell JP. Meta-analysis of the association between second-hand smoke exposure and stroke. J Public Health (Oxf) 2011;33(4):496–502. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kruger J, Jama A, Kegler M, Baker Holmes C, Hu S, King B. Smoke-Free Rules and Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Vehicles among U.S. Adults-National Adult Tobacco Survey, 2009-2010 and 2013-2014. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(11):1048. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13111048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lim KH, M Fadhli Y, Omar M, et al. Tecnical Report: Evaluation of effectiveness of implementation of ‘Komuniti Sihat Perkasa Negara’ (KOSPEN) Programme in Malaysia - Phase 1. Malaysia: Institute for Public Health, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health; 2015. http://iku.moh.gov.my/images/IKU/Document/REPORT/2014/KOSPEN2014.pdf. Accessed February 17, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Patel M, Thai CL, Meng YY, et al. Smoke-Free Car Legislation and Student Exposure to Smoking. Paediatrics. 2018;141(S1):S40–S50. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1026h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lim KH, Lim HL, Teh CH, et al. Support for smoke-free policy among Malaysian adults: findings from a population-based study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e020304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Institute for Public Health . [Tobacco & E-Cigarette Survey Among Malaysian Adolescents (TECMA)] 2016. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Tobacco Induced Diseases are provided here courtesy of The International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases

RESOURCES