Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Apr 9;33(6):101500. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101500

Uveitis and the Gut Microbiota

Shilpa Kodati 1, H Nida Sen 1
PMCID: PMC7299813  NIHMSID: NIHMS1584893  PMID: 32278666

Abstract

Uveitis is a heterogeneous collection of inflammatory diseases of the intraocular uveal tissues and adjacent structures and they collectively are a significant cause of visual morbidity. In recent years, investigating the contribution of the gut microbiota to autoimmunity, including in the development of uveitis has gained interest. Decreased disease severity has been observed in both the induced experimental autoimmune model (EAU) of uveitis and the spontaneous RI61H model of uveitis in mice treated with oral broad-spectrum antibiotics and raised in germ-free conditions, implicating a role for the gut microbiota in the development of disease in these models. Also, in support of these findings are the differences in the composition of the microbiota that have been reported in uveitis patients. Proposed mechanisms accounting for the microbiota triggering uveitis include antigenic mimicry and dysbiosis leading to dysregulation of the immune system. An improved understanding of these mechanisms will facilitate potential therapeutic approaches including alteration of the microbiota with probiotic treatment and fecal microbiota transplants.

Keywords: microbiome, uveitis, dysbiosis, antigenic mimicry

Introduction

The term “uveitis” refers to a heterogeneous collection of inflammatory diseases of the intraocular uveal tissues and adjacent structures 1. Uveitis is not only a significant cause of visual morbidity but can lead to sight-threating inflammation and has been estimated to account for up to 15% of blindness in the United States 24. An imbalance between auto-reactive pathogenic effector T-cells, including T-helper (Th1) and Th17 lymphocytes with T-regulatory cells has been implicated in the pathogenesis of non-infectious uveitis 5.

The adult intestines are home to a complex microbial ecosystem consisting of an estimated 100 trillion organisms (Host-Bacterial Mutualism in the Human Intestine). There are numerous reported beneficial effects of the gut commensals which include facilitating metabolism of nutrients, maintaining the intestinal barrier and preventing pathologic bacterial colonies from colonizing 6, 7. In recent years, the contribution of the gut microbiota on immune function has been recognized including their important role in regulating T-regulatory cell and Th17 cell mucosal responses 8. For example, the commensal Bacteroides fragilis has been shown to promote inducible T-regulatory cells within the colon 9. The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) Human Microbiome Project was established in 2007 to study human commensal microbiota and has reported associations between some clinical phenotypes and microbiota composition 10. Ribosomal 16S RNA gene sequencing is permitting identification of the different species that constitute the gut microbiome 10. Interest has emerged on the role of the commensal microbiota and dysbiosis on the pathogenesis of a spectrum of immune-mediated diseases including in multiple sclerosis 11, type I diabetes 12, rheumatoid arthritis 13 and ankylosing spondylitis amongst others 14. Mirroring the interest that has arisen in the role of commensal bacteria in the development of non-ocular immune-mediated diseases, recent studies have explored the role the gut microbiota in the development of autoimmune uveitis 1521. Given that uveitis is a chronic disease and the lifetime burden of the disease to patients, many of whom typically require long-term treatment with immunomodulatory therapy 22, an improved understanding of the microbiota in the pathogenesis of the disease will ultimately facilitate therapeutic approaches. In this review, we will summarize the literature to date on this field, including reports from animal models of uveitis and observational clinical studies, as well as discuss proposed mechanisms of the gut microbiota triggering uveitis and future therapeutic approaches of altering the gut microbiota to treat uveitic diseases.

Insights from mouse models of uveitis

The observations that depleting the gut microbiota attenuates disease severity in mouse models of autoimmune uveitis have implicated a role for the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of uveitis 17, 23, 24. In the experimental autoimmune (EAU) model of uveitis, uveitis is induced through immunizing mice with interphotoreceptor binding protein peptide (IRBP) and Freund’s adjuvant 25. Nakamura and colleagues reported a significant decrease in the clinical severity of EAU in B10.RIII mice who received combination treatment with oral broad-spectrum antibiotics (vancomycin, metronidazole, neomycin and ampicillin) starting one-week prior to immunization with IRBP. Notably, no effect was seen in mice that received intraperitoneal antibiotics, dissuading from a generalized anti-inflammatory effect of antibiotic treatment. Further, an increase in the frequencies of T-regulatory cells was observed within the gastrointestinal lamina propria as well as the cervical and mesenteric lymph nodes of the antibiotic treated mice 17. In accord with these findings, a reduction in EAU severity was also observed in C57BL/6J mice raised in germ-free conditions 23. Despite the value of these observations, these studies are limited by the demonstration that the immunization process itself can affect the microbiome 17. In addition to the classic EAU model, observations from studies involving the spontaneous R161H model of uveitis have also suggested a role for the microbiome in the pathogenesis of uveitis. The R161H mice have a B10.RIII background and spontaneously develop uveitis due to their expression of a transgenic T-cell receptor that is specific to IRBP. Of their CD4+ T-cell compartment, 20–30% of peripheral CD4+ cells are IRBP specific and consequently, 100% of mice develop uveitis by 2-months of age 26. Both rearing R161H mice under germ-free conditions and treating mice prior to birth with a combination of broad-spectrum antibiotics resulted in significantly decreased severity of the disease and was associated with decreased frequencies of IRBP-specific T cells in the intestinal lamina propria 24. The observation of decreased disease activity in both spontaneous and inducible models of uveitis (in which disease induction is dependent on an immunization trigger) is suggestive of a multifactorial role of the microbiota in the pathogenesis of this disease.

Observational studies in patients with uveitis

To date, a few observational studies have compared the microbiota of uveitis patients to normal healthy controls. Huang and co-authors studied the microbiota composition and fecal metabolites in patients with anterior uveitis compared to normal volunteers. A significant difference in the diversity of microbiota or microbial composition was not observed after correction methods were employed although their study was limited by their sample size of 38 patients. However, a significant difference between the two groups was observed when examining fecal metabolites 27. Chakravarthy and colleagues studied the gut microbiota of a heterogenous group of 13 uveitis patients in India, and compared this to 13 healthy controls with a similar ethnic and dietary attributes. They reported decreased microbiota diversity in their uveitis cohort. Notably, they also demonstrated a reduction in the diversity of several purported anti-inflammatory microbes (including Faecalibacterium, Bacteroides) and an increase in the pro-inflammatory Prevotella in uveitis patients 16. This group also investigated the gut fungal microbiome within this cohort of uveitis patients and similarly observed a decrease in the number of fungal species and diversity in uveitis patients compared to healthy controls 15. However, whether and how much corticosteroids or immunosupressives these patients were on was not specified. The microbiota of Chinese patients with active Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease was studied by Ye et al., who similarly to Huang and colleagues, observed no differences in diversity measures between VKH patients and healthy controls. They did however report relative enrichment of Paraprevotella spp. and depletion of Clostridium spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Candidatus Methanomethylophilus alvus and Methanoculleus sp. CAG:1088 in the active VKH patients compared to the control group while the enterotypes showed no significant difference between patients and controls. They also showed that these differences were reduced following treatment with immunomodulatory therapy and that Alistipes and Bacteroides spp. were associated with good response to imunosupressive therapy. Using 37 species, they developed a classifier that distinguished patients with good prognosis from those that relapsed with high sensitivity and specificity. They also performed fecal microbiota transplants (FMT) pooled from active, treatment-naive VKH patients into antibiotic treated B10RIII mice, prior to EAU induction. These mice exhibited a significant increase in both clinical and retinal histological scores compared to mice that received FMTs from normal healthy volunteers or PBS treated mice 21. Interestingly, this group also reported a similar finding of increased disease severity in EAU mice following FMTs from patients with Bechet’s disease compared to control mice 20.

Although these studies undoubtedly offer insights into the role of the microbiota in uveitis, they have their inherent limitations. Faecal samples from patients may not be fully representative of their gut microbiota, although clearly the non-invasive nature of this sampling technique is beneficial. Secondly, although these observational studies demonstrate some associations between the microbiota and uveitis, they do not demonstrate causality. Similar to other autoimmune diseases, it remains unclear whether the observed differences are etiological factors in the development of the disease or rather the result of disease itself 28. Lastly, more studies are required to better characterize the patterns of dysbiosis in uveitis patients.

Proposed Mechanisms of the Microbiota triggering uveitis

Several non-mutually exclusive mechanisms have been proposed for the involvement of the microbiota in the pathogenesis of uveitis as well as other autoimmune diseases, including: 1) antigenic mimicry; 2) dysbiosis (including HLA-associated dysbiosis) leading to impaired microbiome-dependent immune homeostasis; 3) dysbiosis resulting in disruption of intestinal barrier function and 4) migration of gut mucosal-associated lymphocytes to peripheral sites.

Antigenic mimicry is the process whereby autoreactive T-cells are generated through cross-reactivity of gut microbial peptides with self-antigens 29. The observation that the adoptive transfer of R161H derived T-cells activated in vitro by intestinal contents can induce disease in 40–86% of naïve wild-type mice within 6–10 days (compared to no disease induction within this time frame following the adoptive transfer of T-cells cultured in the absence of intestinal contents) is supportive of a candidate microbial mimic 24. Although specific microbial antigens triggering uveitis through mimicry have yet to be identified, a candidate antigen from Fusobacteria mimicking islet-specific glucose-6-phosphate catalytic subunit-related protein (IGRP) has been identified in non-obese diabetic mice 30. Microbial cross-reactivity has also been demonstrated in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Commensals have been identified in the skin, oral mucosa and gut of lupus patients and healthy controls that are orthologs of the RNA binding autoantigen Ro60. One of these identified commensals, Propionibacterium propionicum, activated Ro60-specific CD4 memory T-cells from lupus patients 31. Similarly, three species of gut commensal bacteria (Prevotella, Parabactereroides and Butyrucumonas) were identified that share homology with the autoantigens N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase and filament A in rheumatoid arthritis patients 32.

Given the importance of the commensal microbiota in immune homeostasis 8, it has been proposed that a relative dysbiosis (which refers to imbalances in the microbiome ecosystem) may result in maladaptive immune regulation including an imbalance in mucosal Th17/T-regulatory cells. Decreased levels of “anti-inflammatory” microbial metabolites have also been implicated in dysbiosis 33. Thus, dysbiosis could potentially lower the threshold for activating pathogenic autoimmune Th17 effector cells through, for example, an innocuous antigen triggering a response through microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) or danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) receptors 19.

The importance of microbial-derived metabolites in immune homeostasis is emerging. One such example are short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which are derived from fermentation of intestinal microbial metabolites and have been shown to increase colonic T-regulatory cell frequencies in the gut in mice following administration of this metabolite 34. A possible role of SCFAs in the development of uveitis is supported by the observation of a beneficial effect on clinical EAU scores following the administration of the SCFA propionate in drinking water prior to immunization of C57BL/6 EAU mice but not in B10.RIII mice. Increased frequencies of T-regulatory cell within the intestinal lamina propria were also observed. The SCFAs acetate and butyrate also resulted in T-regulatory cell induction but did not alter the clinical course of EAU 18.

Genetic factors such as HLA haplotypes can influence the gut microbiota, which is significant given the association of certain uveitic diseases with HLA haplotypes. Experiments in transgenic rats expressing human HLA-B27 revealed alteration of the gut microbiome compared to littermate controls 35, 36. Notably, HLA-B27 is highly associated with spondyloarthropathies and anterior uveitis 37. The demonstration of increased expression of bactericidal antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and increased numbers of secretory IgA-coated bacteria in the faeces of these HLA-B27 transgenic mice have been implicated as a possible causative mechanism of dysbiosis 35.

Disruption of the intestinal barrier through dysbiosis has also been proposed as a causative mechanism and may result in the translocation of either bacteria or microbial antigens into the blood or lymphatic system. This could lead to induction of an immune response either through an adjuvant mechanism or via the initiation of a local response to these microbes. This hypothesis has been supported by the demonstration of increased intestinal permeability 38 and the detection of bacteria within the synovial fluid 39 of ankylosing spondylitis patients. Despite this data from rheumatological diseases 40 the altered integrity of the gut barrier in uveitis not reported to date.

Lastly, the migration of intestinal cells to peripheral sites has been supported by the report demonstrating the trafficking of leukocytes from the gut to the eye in an EAU mouse model using transgenic mice which express the photoconverting fluorescent reporter Kaede 18.

Despite this data, the relative contribution of the different proposed mechanisms to the development of uveitis remains uncertain.

Therapeutic approaches

A number of therapeutic approaches to the treatment of uveitis through alteration of the microbiota and addressing dysbiosis have been proposed.

Probiotics are thought to alter the immune responses in gut mucosal tissues through interactions with mucosal dendritic cells and stimulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines secretion such as IL-10 and TGF-B 41. Using an EAU model, Kim et al. observed decreased retinal histological scores following three weeks of treatment with probiotics through oral gavage (L. casei, L. acidophilus, L. reuteri, B. bifidum, and S. thermophilus) following immunization with IRBP in C57BL/6 mice 42.

Since diet is known to influence the microbiota 43, specific dietary modifications may theoretically, minimize dysbiosis, induce beneficial bacteria, and lead to the production of metabolites that promote immune-regulation. In addition to modification of diet, the direct ingestion of SCFAs or other beneficial bacterial metabolites may have a direct effect on modulating the gut mucosal immunity. Indeed, ingestion of the SCFA propionate has been reported to decreased the severity of EAU 18.

Fecal microbiota transplants (FMT) involve placing stool from a normal donor into the gastrointestinal tract of a patient and is used in the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis 44 successfully and its use has also been studied in inflammatory bowel disease 7 where its effects have been more modest. To date, there have been no trials investigating the effect of FMTs in uveitis patients 45. Despite the observation of worsening severity of EAU following FMTs from patients with active VKH and Behcet’s disease into EAU mice 20, 21, it cannot be assumed that the reverse would necessarily occur and that alteration in clinical disease would be seen following FMTs from normal healthy volunteers to patients with active uveitis.

Other possible approaches include targeting specific pathogenic causative bacteria (assuming they can be identified) with antibiotics or treating with medications to reduce intestinal permeability, which may be effective in preventing the dissemination of bacterial products.

Future Directions

Although the microbiome is emerging as an importance influence of autoimmunity, the relative importance of the microbiota to the development uveitis compared to other established genetic and environmental factors is unclear. Further, the majority of data to date on the involvement of gut microbiota in uveitis has arisen from mouse models of uveitis, which despite the value of these observations, are limited in the applicability due to the heterogenous spectrum of human uveitic diseases. The identification of microbial mimics, the genetic and environmental factors that promote dysbiosis, the relative contribution of dysbiosis to the development of clinical uveitic diseases and the extent to which alteration of commensal microbiota can lead to modification of disease activity in patients with established disease remains unknown are some of the critical questions that need to be addressed. Further studies are required to more completely characterize the microbiota in uveitis patients, including classifying constituent microbes into beneficial or maladaptive in order to achieve an improved understanding of these mechanisms, which will ultimately facilitate future therapeutic approaches.

Summary

The importance of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of uveitis is emerging. Results from mouse models of uveitis have reported decreased disease severity in mice raised in germ-free conditions or following treatment with oral broad-spectrum antibiotics, implicating a role for the gut microbiota in the development of uveitis. The role of the gut microbiota has also been implicated by the reported differences in the composition of the microbiota in uveitis patients compared to normal controls. The mechanisms involved are still to be fully elucidated but antigenic mimicry and dysbiosis leading to dysregulation of the immune system and disruption of the intestinal barrier have been proposed. Further understanding of the microbiota in the development of uveitis is necessary for the development of therapeutic strategies to alter the microbiota and address dysbiosis.

Research Agenda

  • Characterization of the commensal microbiota in uveitis patients;

  • Understanding the mechanisms through which dysbiosis can contribute or trigger uveitis including antigenic mimicry and dysregulation of the mucosal immune responses;

  • The development of future therapeutic approaches, which include the role of probiotics and fecal microbiota transplants and whether alterations of the microbiota in patients with established uveitis can modify the course of disease activity

Practice Points

  • The term uveitis refers to a heterogeneous collection of inflammatory diseases of the intraocular uveal tissues and adjacent structures;

  • Uveitis is a significant cause of visual morbidity and has been estimated to account for up to 15% of blindness in the United States

  • An imbalance between auto-reactive pathogenic effector T-cells, including T-helper (Th1) and Th17 lymphocytes with T-regulatory cells has been implicated in the pathogenesis of non-infectious uveitis;

  • The gut microbiota has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of uveitis

Acknowledgments

Financial Support: National Institutes of Health (NIH) Intramural Research Program

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: both authors do not have any conflicts of interest

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, Standardization OUNSUNWG. Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the First International Workshop. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140 (3):509–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dick AD, Tundia N, Sorg R, Zhao C, Chao J, Joshi A, Skup M. Risk of Ocular Complications in Patients with Noninfectious Intermediate Uveitis, Posterior Uveitis, or Panuveitis. Ophthalmology 2016;123 (3):655–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rothova A, Suttorp-van Schulten MS, Frits Treffers W, Kijlstra A. Causes and frequency of blindness in patients with intraocular inflammatory disease. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80 (4):332–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Suttorp-Schulten MS, Rothova A. The possible impact of uveitis in blindness: a literature survey. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80 (9):844–848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mochizuki M, Sugita S, Kamoi K. Immunological homeostasis of the eye. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013;33 10–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Durack J, Lynch SV. The gut microbiome: Relationships with disease and opportunities for therapy. J Exp Med 2019;216 (1):20–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aggeletopoulou I, Konstantakis C, Assimakopoulos SF, Triantos C. The role of the gut microbiota in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Microb Pathog 2019;137: 103774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xu H, Liu M, Cao J et al. The Dynamic Interplay between the Gut Microbiota and Autoimmune Diseases. J Immunol Res 2019;2019: 7546047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Round JL, Mazmanian SK. Inducible Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell development by a commensal bacterium of the intestinal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107 (27):12204–12209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.NIH HMPAT. A review of 10 years of human microbiome research activities at the US National Institutes of Health, Fiscal Years 2007–2016. Microbiome 2019;7 (1):31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cryan JF, O’Riordan KJ, Sandhu K, Peterson V, Dinan TG. The gut microbiome in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol 2020;19 (2):179–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Durazzo M, Ferro A, Gruden G. Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: The State of Art. J Clin Med 2019;8 (11): 1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.du Teil Espina M, Gabarrini G, Harmsen HJM, Westra J, van Winkelhoff AJ, van Dijl JM. Talk to your gut: the oral-gut microbiome axis and its immunomodulatory role in the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2019;43 (1):1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang L, Hu Y, Xu Y, Li P, Ma H, Li X, Li M. The correlation between intestinal dysbiosis and the development of ankylosing spondylitis. Microb Pathog 2019;132 188–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jayasudha R, Kalyana Chakravarthy S, Sai Prashanthi G, Sharma S, Tyagi M, Shivaji S. Implicating Dysbiosis of the Gut Fungal Microbiome in Uveitis, an Inflammatory Disease of the Eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2019;60 (5):1384–1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kalyana Chakravarthy S, Jayasudha R, Sai Prashanthi G, Ali MH, Sharma S, Tyagi M, Shivaji S. Dysbiosis in the Gut Bacterial Microbiome of Patients with Uveitis, an Inflammatory Disease of the Eye. Indian J Microbiol 2018;58 (4):457–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nakamura YK, Metea C, Karstens L et al. Gut Microbial Alterations Associated With Protection From Autoimmune Uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57 (8):3747–3758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nakamura YK, Janowitz C, Metea C, Asquith M, Karstens L, Rosenbaum JT, Lin P. Short chain fatty acids ameliorate immune-mediated uveitis partially by altering migration of lymphocytes from the intestine. Sci Rep 2017;7 (1):11745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rosenbaum JT, Lin P, Asquith M. Does the Microbiome Cause B27-related Acute Anterior Uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2016;24 (4):440–444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ye Z, Zhang N, Wu C et al. A metagenomic study of the gut microbiome in Behcet’s disease. Microbiome 2018;6 (1):135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ye Z, Wu C, Zhang N et al. Altered gut microbiome composition in patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Gut Microbes 2020; 1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miserocchi E, Modorati G, Mosconi P, Colucci A, Bandello F. Quality of life in patients with uveitis on chronic systemic immunosuppressive treatment. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2010;18 (4):297–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heissigerova J, Seidler Stangova P, Klimova A et al. The Microbiota Determines Susceptibility to Experimental Autoimmune Uveoretinitis. J Immunol Res 2016;2016: 5065703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Horai R, Zárate-Bladés CR, Dillenburg-Pilla P et al. Microbiota-Dependent Activation of an Autoreactive T Cell Receptor Provokes Autoimmunity in an Immunologically Privileged Site. Immunity 2015;43 (2):343–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Caspi RR, Roberge FG, Chan CC et al. A new model of autoimmune disease. Experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis induced in mice with two different retinal antigens. J Immunol 1988;140 (5):1490–1495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Horai R, Silver PB, Chen J et al. Breakdown of immune privilege and spontaneous autoimmunity in mice expressing a transgenic T cell receptor specific for a retinal autoantigen. J Autoimmun 2013;44 21–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang X, Ye Z, Cao Q et al. Gut Microbiota Composition and Fecal Metabolic Phenotype in Patients With Acute Anterior Uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018;59 (3):1523–1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Walter J, Armet AM, Finlay BB, Shanahan F. Establishing or Exaggerating Causality for the Gut Microbiome: Lessons from Human Microbiota-Associated Rodents. Cell 2020;180 (2):221–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rojas M, Restrepo-Jiménez P, Monsalve DM et al. Molecular mimicry and autoimmunity. J Autoimmun 2018;95 100–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tai N, Peng J, Liu F et al. Microbial antigen mimics activate diabetogenic CD8 T cells in NOD mice. J Exp Med 2016;213 (10):2129–2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Greiling TM, Dehner C, Chen X et al. Commensal orthologs of the human autoantigen Ro60 as triggers of autoimmunity in lupus. Sci Transl Med 2018;10: 434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pianta A, Arvikar SL, Strle K, Drouin EE, Wang Q, Costello CE, Steere AC. Two rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantigens correlate microbial immunity with autoimmune responses in joints. J Clin Invest 2017;127 (8):2946–2956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zeng H, Chi H. Metabolic control of regulatory T cell development and function. Trends Immunol 2015;36 (1):3–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N et al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science 2013;341 (6145):569–573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Asquith MJ, Stauffer P, Davin S, Mitchell C, Lin P, Rosenbaum JT. Perturbed Mucosal Immunity and Dysbiosis Accompany Clinical Disease in a Rat Model of Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016;68 (9):2151–2162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lin P, Bach M, Asquith M et al. HLA-B27 and human β2-microglobulin affect the gut microbiota of transgenic rats. PLoS One 2014;9 (8):e105684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bowness P HLA-B27. Annu Rev Immunol 2015;33 29–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Morris AJ, Howden CW, Robertson C, Duncan A, Torley H, Sturrock RD, Russell RI. Increased intestinal permeability in ankylosing spondylitis--primary lesion or drug effect. Gut 1991;32 (12):1470–1472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pacheco-Tena C, Alvarado De La Barrera C, López-Vidal Y et al. Bacterial DNA in synovial fluid cells of patients with juvenile onset spondyloarthropathies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001;40 (8):920–927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Silverman GJ, Azzouz DF, Alekseyenko AV. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and dysbiosis in the microbiome: cause or effect or both. Curr Opin Immunol 2019;61 80–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kang HJ, Im SH. Probiotics as an Immune Modulator. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 2015;61 Suppl S103–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kim J, Choi SH, Kim YJ et al. Clinical Effect of IRT-5 Probiotics on Immune Modulation of Autoimmunity or Alloimmunity in the Eye. Nutrients 2017;9: 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Illiano P, Brambilla R, Parolini C. The mutual interplay of gut microbiota, diet and human disease. FEBS J. In press [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cheng YW, Fischer M. Treatment of Severe and Fulminnant Clostridioides difficile Infection. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2019;17 (4):524–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Choi RY, Asquith M, Rosenbaum JT. Fecal transplants in spondyloarthritis and uveitis: ready for a clinical trial. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2018;30 (4):303–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES